Study on the effect of morphological changes of bridge piers on water movement properties
Xianqi Zhanga,b,c, Tao Wanga,* and Bingsen Duana
a Water Conservancy College, North china University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
b Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Protection Engineering, Zhengzhou 450046, China c Technology Research Center of Water Conservancy and Marine Tra
하천을 가로지르는 교각의 다른 형태는 하천의 유동에 큰 영향을 미치며, 교각의 형태 변화가 물의 유동 특성에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구는 교량 설계 및 하천 범람에 큰 가치가 있습니다.
유체 역학 모델은 하천 흐름 패턴의 변화를 효과적으로 시뮬레이션하고 예측할 수 있으므로 하천 관리에 대한 과학적 데이터 지원을 제공할 수 있습니다.
본 논문은 Mike21을 기반으로 유체역학 모델을 구축하고 이를 황하 하류의 하천 유체역학 수치해석에 적용하고, 타원 교각을 예로 들어 교각 형태 변화가 유속에 미치는 영향을 모사한다. 강의 수위와 흐름장. 결과는 하천의 흐름 특성에 대한 타원형 교각 형태의 영향이 중요하다는 것을 보여줍니다.
동일한 유량에서 최대 축 비율에서 교각의 혼잡 값은 최소 축 비율의 1.65배이며 축 비율이 클수록 혼잡이 심각합니다. 최대 축 비율에서 유속의 차이는 최소 축 비율의 2.33배에 달할 수 있습니다.
The different shapes of bridge piers across rivers have a great influence on the river water movement, and the study of the influence of pier morphology changes on the water movement characteristics is of great value for bridge design and river flooding. The hydrodynamic model can effectively simulate and predict the changes of river flow patterns, which can provide scientific data support for river management. This paper constructs a hydrodynamic model based on Mike21 and applies it to the numerical simulation of river hydrodynamics in the lower reaches of the Yellow River, taking elliptical piers as an example, and simulates the effect of the change of pier morphology on the flow velocity, water level and flow field of the river. The results show that the effect of elliptical pier morphology on the flow characteristics of the river channel is significant; under the same flow rate, the congestion value of the pier at the maximum axis ratio is 1.65 times of the minimum axis ratio, and the larger the axis ratio, the more serious the congestion; the difference in flow velocity at the maximum axis ratio can reach 2.33 times of the minimum axis ratio.
bridge pier axial ratio, flow regime, MIKE21 flow model, numerical simulation, yellow river
Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S. & Hervouet, J. M. 2015 Investigating two-dimensional, finite element predictions of floodplain
inundation using fractal generated topography. Hydrological Processes 12(8), 1257–1277.
Costabile, P., Macchione, F., Natale, L. & Petaccia, G. 2015 Comparison of scenarios with and without bridges and analysis of
backwater effect in 1-D and 2-D river flood modeling. CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 109–110(2),
David, Y. Y., Dan, M. & Frangopol, 2019 Physics-based assessment of climate change impact on long-term regional bridge
scour risk using hydrologic modeling: application to Lehigh River watershed. Journal of Bridge Engineering 24(11).
Dimitriadis, P., Tegos, A., Oikonomou, A., Pagana, V., Koukouvinos, A., Mamassis, N., Koutsoyiannis, D. & Efstratiadis, A.
2016 Comparative evaluation of 1D and quasi-2D hydraulic models based on benchmark and real-world applications for
uncertainty assessment in flood mapping. Journal of Hydrology 534, 478–492.
Echeverribar, I., Morales-Hernández, M., Brufau, P. & García-Navarro, 2019 2D numerical simulation of unsteady flows for
large scale floods prediction in real time. Advances in Water Resources 134.
Hai, X. S. & Wei, P. L. 2018 Numerical simulation of turbulent width of square bridge pier in curved river channel. Water
Transport Engineering (01), 134–141.
Liu, X. C., Geng, P. C., Cao, L. & Sun, X. L. 2020 Mike21 simulates the influence of cross-river bridge on river regime. People’s
Yellow River 42(S1), 24–25 þ 29.
Luo, W. G., Lu, J. & Lai, H. 2015 Research on the backwater in front of multiple parallel bridge piers at equal distances. Journal
of Sichuan University: Engineering Science Editio 47(4), 6–13.
Majedul, M. M., Ekaterina, S. & Nynke, H. 2018 Modelling of river faecal indicator bacteria dynamics as a basis for faecal
contamination reduction. Journal of Hydrology 563.
Mao, M. X., Huang, H. M. & Wang, Y. G. 2018 Effects of grid size on numerical simulation of river hydrodynamics [J]. Influence
of grid size on numerical simulation of river hydrodynamics. Water Transport Engineering (3), 135–142.
Tang, Y. H. 2014 Application of TUFLOW in simulating the impact of bridge piers on flooding evaluation. Hydropower Energy
Science 32(02), 55–59.
Tewodros, A. N. & Abdusselam, A. 2019 Modeling the effect of urbanization on flood risk in Ayamama Watershed, Istanbul,
Turkey, using the MIKE 21 FM model. Natural Hazards 99(2).
Wan, L. M. & Li, P. J. 2018 Numerical simulation of navigable flow conditions of bridges across rivers. Water Conservancy
Science and Technology and Economy 24(02), 28–33.
Wang, W. & Jing, H. 2019 Effects of bridge piers on flood hazards: a case study on the Jialing river in China. Water 11(6), 1181.
Wang, Q. N., Peng, W. Q., Dong, F. & Nan, O. 2020 Simulating flow of an urban river course with complex cross sections based
on the MIKE21 FM model. Water 12(3).
Xu, T. 2010 Overview of Danish MIKE21 model and application examples. Water Technology and Economics 16(08), 867–869.
Yan, J. C., Xu, H. & Jiao, Z. X. 2020 Prediction and numerical simulation of bridge pier congestion based on conservation of
momentum. People’s Changjiang 51(S2), 280–284.
Yu, P. & Zhu, Z. W. 2019 Refinement of local scour simulation for tandem double cylindrical bridge piers. Chinese Journal of
Highways 32(01), 107–116.
Yuan, X. Y., Feng, S. L., Wang, Z. K., Xu, W. & Si, L. C. 2020 Two-dimensional numerical simulation of the effect of bridge pier
shape on water flow. People’s Yellow River 42(S2), 37–39 þ 42.
Zhang, S. G., Yin, J. B. & Zhang, G. G. 2020 Flow-3D-based simulation of local scour large eddies for cylindrical bridge piers.
Sediment Research 45(01), 67–73.
Zhang, X. Q., Wang, T. & Lu, X. B. 2021 Influence of bridge piers shapes on the flow of the lower Yellow River. Water Practice
& Technology 16(2), 661–680.