• Yupeng Ren, Yi Zhang, Guohui Xu, Xingbei Xu, Houjie Wang & Zhiyuan Chen 

Abstract

Abstract해저 협곡에서 탁도의 장거리 이동은 많은 양의 퇴적물을 심해 평원으로 운반할 수 있습니다. 이전 연구에서는 5.9~28.0m/s 범위의 다중 케이블 손상 이벤트에서 파생된 탁도 전류 속도와 0.15~7.2m/s 사이의 현장 관찰 결과에서 명백한 차이가 있음을 보여줍니다. 따라서 해저 환경의 탁한 유체가 해저 협곡을 고속으로 장거리로 흐를 수 있는지에 대한 질문이 남아 있습니다. 연구실 시험의 결합을 통해 해저협곡의 탁류의 고속 및 장거리 운동을 설명하기 위해 약안정 퇴적물 기반의 새로운 모델(약안정 퇴적물에 대한 파손 전파 모델 제안, 줄여서 WSS-PFP 모델)을 제안합니다. 및 수치 아날로그. 이 모델은 두 가지 메커니즘을 기반으로 합니다. 1) 원래 탁도류는 약하게 안정한 퇴적층의 불안정화를 촉발하고 연질 퇴적물의 불안정화 및 하류 방향으로의 이동을 촉진하고 2) 원래 탁도류가 협곡으로 이동할 때 형성되는 여기파가 불안정화로 이어진다. 하류 방향으로 약하게 안정한 퇴적물의 수송. 제안된 모델은 심해 퇴적, 오염 물질 이동 및 광 케이블 손상 연구를 위한 동적 프로세스 해석을 제공할 것입니다.

The long-distance movement of turbidity currents in submarine canyons can transport large amounts of sediment to deep-sea plains. Previous studies show obvious differences in the turbidity current velocities derived from the multiple cables damage events ranging from 5.9 to 28.0 m/s and those of field observations between 0.15 and 7.2 m/s. Therefore, questions remain regarding whether a turbid fluid in an undersea environment can flow through a submarine canyon for a long distance at a high speed. A new model based on weakly stable sediment is proposed (proposed failure propagation model for weakly stable sediments, WSS-PFP model for short) to explain the high-speed and long-range motion of turbidity currents in submarine canyons through the combination of laboratory tests and numerical analogs. The model is based on two mechanisms: 1) the original turbidity current triggers the destabilization of the weakly stable sediment bed and promotes the destabilization and transport of the soft sediment in the downstream direction and 2) the excitation wave that forms when the original turbidity current moves into the canyon leads to the destabilization and transport of the weakly stable sediment in the downstream direction. The proposed model will provide dynamic process interpretation for the study of deep-sea deposition, pollutant transport, and optical cable damage.

Keyword

• turbidity current
• excitation wave
• dense basal layer
• velocity
• WSS-PFP model

References

• Azpiroz-Zabala M, Cartigny M J B, Talling P J et al. 2017. Newly recognized turbidity current structure can explain prolonged flushing of submarine canyons. Science Advances, 3(10): e1700200, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700200.Article Google Scholar 
• Bagnold R A. 1962. Auto-suspension of transported sediment; turbidity currents. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 265(1322): 315–319, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1962.0012.Google Scholar 
• Carter L, Gavey R, Talling P J et al. 2014. Insights into submarine geohazards from breaks in subsea telecommunication cables. Oceanography, 27(2): 58–67, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.40.Article Google Scholar 
• Carter L, Milliman J D, Talling P J et al. 2012. Near-synchronous and delayed initiation of long run-out submarine sediment flows from a record-breaking river flood, offshore Taiwan. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(12): L12603, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051172.Article Google Scholar 
• Cooper C, Wood J, Imran J et al. 2016. Designing for turbidity currents in the Congo Canyon. In: Offshore Technology Conference. OTC, Houston, TX. OTC-26919-MSp, https://doi.org/10.4043/26919-ms.Google Scholar 
• Dengler A T, Wilde P, Noda E K et al. 1984. Turbidity currents generated by Hurricane Iwa. Geo-Marine Letters, 4(1): 5–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02237967.Article Google Scholar 
• Fang A M, Li J L, Hou Q L. 1998. Sedimentation of turbidity currents and relative gravity flows: a review. Geological Review, 44(3): 270–280, https://doi.org/10.16509/j.georeview.1998.03.009. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar 
• Felix M, Peakall J. 2006. Transformation of debris flows into turbidity currents: mechanisms inferred from laboratory experiments. Sedimentology, 53(1): 107–123, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2005.00757.x.Article Google Scholar 
• Gavey R, Carter L, Liu J T et al. 2017. Frequent sediment density flows during 2006 to 2015, triggered by competing seismic and weather events: observations from subsea cable breaks off southern Taiwan. Marine Geology, 384: 147–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2016.06.001.Article Google Scholar 
• Heerema C J, Talling P J, Cartigny M J et al. 2020. What determines the downstream evolution of turbidity currents?. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 532: 116023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116023.Article Google Scholar 
• Heezen B C, Ericson D B, Ewing M. 1954. Further evidence for a turbidity current following the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. Deep Sea Research (1953), 1(4): 193–202, https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6313(54)90001-5.Article Google Scholar 
• Heezen B C, Ewing M. 1955. Orleansville earthquake and turbidity currents. AAPG Bulletin, 39(12): 2505–2514, https://doi.org/10.1306/5ceae2e6-16bb-11d7-8645000102c1865d.Google Scholar 
• Heezen B C, Ewing W M. 1952. Turbidity currents and submarine slumps, and the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. American Journal of Science, 250(12): 849–873, https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.250.12.849.Article Google Scholar 
• Hsu S K, Kuo J, Lo C L et al. 2008. Turbidity currents, submarine landslides and the 2006 Pingtung earthquake off SW Taiwan. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 19(6): 767–772, https://doi.org/10.3319/tao.2008.19.6.767(pt).Article Google Scholar 
• Krause D C, White W C, Piper D J W et al. 1970. Turbidity currents and cable breaks in the western New Britain Trench. GSA Bulletin, 81(7): 2153–2160, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[2153:tcacbi]2.0.co;2.Article Google Scholar 
• Kuenen P H. 1952. Estimated size of the Grand Banks turbidity current. American Journal of Science, 250(12): 874–884, https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.250.12.874.Article Google Scholar 
• Lambert A M, Kelts K R, Marshall N F. 1976. Measurements of density underflows from Walensee, Switzerland. Sedimentology, 23(1): 87–105, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1976.tb00040.x.Article Google Scholar 
• Liu J T, Wang Y H, Yang R J et al. 2012. Cyclone-induced hyperpycnal turbidity currents in a submarine canyon. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117(C4): C04033, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007630.Article Google Scholar 
• Maier K L, Gales J A, Paull C K et al. 2019. Linking direct measurements of turbidity currents to submarine canyon-floor deposits. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7: 144, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00144.Article Google Scholar 
• Mulder T, Syvitski J P M, Migeon S et al. 2003. Marine hyperpycnal flows: initiation, behavior and related deposits. A review. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 20(6–8): 861–882, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.01.003.Article Google Scholar 
• Nie X, Luo W D, Zhou J. 2017. Depositional characteristics of the Penghu submarine canyon in the northeastern South China Sea. Marine Geology Frontiers, 33(8): 18–23, https://doi.org/10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.08003. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar 
• Nilsen T H, Shew R D, Steffens G S et al. 2008. Atlas of Deep-Water Outcrops. AAPG, Tulsa, https://doi.org/10.1306/St561240.Book Google Scholar 
• Parker G, Fukushima Y, Pantin H M. 1986. Self-accelerating turbidity currents. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 171: 145–181, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112086001404.Article Google Scholar 
• Parker G. 1982. Conditions for the ignition of catastrophically erosive turbidity currents. Marine Geology, 46(3–4): 307–327, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(82)90086-x.Article Google Scholar 
• Paull C K, Caress D W, Lundsten E et al. 2013. Anatomy of the La Jolla Submarine Canyon system; offshore southern California. Marine Geology, 335: 16–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2012.10.003.Article Google Scholar 
• Paull C K, Caress D W, Ussler III B et al. 2011. High-resolution bathymetry of the axial channels within Monterey and Soquel submarine canyons, offshore central California. Geosphere, 7(5): 1077–1101, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00636.1.Article Google Scholar 
• Paull C K, Talling P J, Maier K L et al. 2018. Powerful turbidity currents driven by dense basal layers. Nature Communications, 9(1): 4114, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06254-6.Article Google Scholar 
• Piper D J W, Shor A N, Clarke J E H. 1988. The 1929 “Grand banks” earthquake, slump, and turbidity current. In: Clifton H E ed. Sedimentologic Consequences of Convulsive Geologic Events. Geological Society of America. p.77–92, https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE229-p77.
• Sequeiros O E, Mosquera R, Pedocchi F. 2018. Internal structure of a self-accelerating turbidity current. Journal of Geophysical Research, 123(9): 6260–6276, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jc014061.Article Google Scholar 
• Sequeiros O E, Naruse H, Endo N et al. 2009. Experimental study on self-accelerating turbidity currents. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(C5): C05025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jc005149.Article Google Scholar 
• Shepard F P. 1954. High-velocity turbidity currents, a discussion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 222(1150): 323–326, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1954.0072.Google Scholar 
• Stetson H C, Smith J F. 1938. Behavior of suspension currents and mud slides on the continental slope. American Journal of Science, s5–35(205): 1–13, https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s5-35.205.1.Article Google Scholar 
• Symons W Q, Sumner E J, Paull C K et al. 2017. A new model for turbidity current behavior based on integration of flow monitoring and precision coring in a submarine canyon. Geology, 45(4): 367–370, https://doi.org/10.1130/g38764.1.Article Google Scholar 
• Talling P J, Allin J, Armitage D A et al. 2015. Key future directions for research on turbidity currents and their deposits. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 85(2): 153–169, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2015.03.Article Google Scholar 
• Wang Z W, Xu J P, Talling P J et al. 2020. Direct evidence of a high-concentration basal layer in a submarine turbidity current. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 161: 103300, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2020.103300.Article Google Scholar 
• Winterwerp J C. 2006. Stratification effects by fine suspended sediment at low, medium, and very high concentrations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(C5): C05012, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jc003019.Article Google Scholar 
• Xu J P. 2014. Turbidity Current research in the past century: an overview. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 44(10): 98–105, https://doi.org/10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.2014.10.014.Google Scholar 
• Zeng J J, Lowe D R, Prior D B et al. 1991. Flow properties of turbidity currents in Bute Inlet, British Columbia. Sedimentology, 38(6): 975–996, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1991.tb00367.x.Article Google Scholar 
• Zhang X, Wang L, Krabbenhoft K et al. 2020. A case study and implication: particle finite element modelling of the 2010 Saint-Jude sensitive clay landslide. Landslides, 17(5): 1117–1127, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01330-4.Article Google Scholar 
• Zhang Y W, Liu Z F, Zhao Y L et al. 2018. Long-term in situ observations on typhoon-triggered turbidity currents in the deep sea. Geology, 46(8): 675–678, https://doi.org/10.1130/g45178.1.Article Google Scholar 
• Zhou H G. 2020. Experimental study on flow ability and fixed sand bed shear force of turbid suspension.

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Hanru WU from Ocean University of China for his help in thesis writing, and Hao TIAN and Chenxi WANG from Ocean University of China for their helps in the preparation of the experimental materials. Guohui XU is responsible for the development of the initial concept, processing of test data, and management of coauthor contributions to the paper; Yupeng REN for the experiment setup and drafting of the paper; Yi ZHANG and Xingbei XU for the simulation part of the experiment; Houjie WANG for writing guidance; Zhiyuan CHEN for the experiment setup.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Geological Engineering, Qingdao, 266100, ChinaYupeng Ren, Yi Zhang, Guohui Xu, Xingbei Xu & Zhiyuan Chen
2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Geological Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, ChinaYupeng Ren & Houjie Wang
3. Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ocean University of China, Ministry of Education, Qingdao, 266100, ChinaYi Zhang, Guohui Xu, Xingbei Xu & Zhiyuan Chen

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guohui Xu.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41976049, 41720104001) and the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province (No. TS20190913), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 202061028)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ren, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, G. et al. The failure propagation of weakly stable sediment: A reason for the formation of high-velocity turbidity currents in submarine canyons. J. Ocean. Limnol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-022-1285-0