Figure 13 | Velocity vector for flow condition Q¼22 l/s, Near surface.

조도 계수 및 역 고도 변화가 향상된 90도 측면 회전에서 유동의 실험 및 수치 연구

Maryam Bagheria, Seyed M. Ali Zomorodianb, Masih Zolghadrc, H. MD. Azamathulla d,*
and C. Venkata Siva Rama Prasade
a Hydraulic Structures, Department of Water Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
b Department of Water Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
c Department of Water Sciences Engineering, College of Agriculture, Jahrom University, Jahrom, Iran
d Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Port of Spain, Trinidad
e Department of Civil Engineering, St. Peters Engineering College, Hyderabad, India
*Corresponding author. E-mail: azmatheditor@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Flow separation at the upstream side of the lateral turnouts (intakes) is a critical issue causing eddy currents at the turn-out entrance. It reduces the effective width of flow, turn-out capacity and efficiency.

Therefore, it is essential to identify the dimensions of the separation zone and propose remedies to reduce its dimensions. Installation of 7 types of roughening elements at the turn-out entrance and 3 different bed level inverts, with 4 different discharges (total of 84 experiments) were examined in this study as a method to reduce the dimensions of
the separation zone.

Additionally, a 3-D Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model was utilized to evaluate the flow pattern and dimensions of the separation zone. Results showed that enhancing the roughness coefficient can reduce the separation zone dimensions up to 38% while the drop implementation effect can scale down this area differently based on the roughness coefficient used. Combining both methods can reduce the separation zone dimensions up to 63%.

측면 분기기(흡입구)의 상류 측에서 흐름 분리는 분기기 입구에서 와류를 일으키는 중요한 문제입니다. 이는 흐름의 유효 폭, 턴아웃 용량 및 효율성을 감소시킵니다. 따라서 분리지대의 크기를 파악하고 크기를 줄이기 위한 방안을 제시하는 것이 필수적이다.

이 연구에서는 분리 구역의 치수를 줄이기 위한 방법으로 4가지 다른 배출(총 84개 실험)과 함께 7가지 유형의 조면화 요소를 출구 입구에 설치하고 3가지 서로 다른 베드 레벨 반전 장치를 조사했습니다.

또한 3D CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics) 모델을 사용하여 분리 영역의 흐름 패턴과 치수를 평가했습니다. 결과는 거칠기 계수를 향상시키면 분리 영역 치수를 최대 38%까지 줄일 수 있는 반면 드롭 구현 효과는 사용된 거칠기 계수를 기반으로 이 영역을 다르게 축소할 수 있음을 보여주었습니다.

두 가지 방법을 결합하면 분리 영역 치수를 최대 63%까지 줄일 수 있습니다.

Key words

discharge ratio, flow separation zone, intake, three dimensional simulation

Experimental and numerical study of flow at a 90 degree lateral turn-out with enhanced roughness coefficient and invert elevation changes
Experimental and numerical study of flow at a 90 degree lateral turn-out with enhanced roughness coefficient and invert elevation changes
Figure 2 | Roughness plates.
Figure 2 | Roughness plates.
Figure 3 | Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions
Figure 3 | Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions
Figure 4 | Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions.
Figure 4 | Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions.
Figure 5 | Comparison of separation zone for n¼0.023 and n¼0.032.
Figure 5 | Comparison of separation zone for n¼0.023 and n¼0.032.
Figure 6 | Effect of drop implementation on separation zone dimensions
Figure 6 | Effect of drop implementation on separation zone dimensions
Figure 7 | Combined effect of roughness and drop on separation zone dimensions
Figure 7 | Combined effect of roughness and drop on separation zone dimensions
Figure 8 | Non- dimensional Length of separation zone (Lr) variations against relative unit discharge per width (qr) in present study compared with other methods.
Figure 8 | Non- dimensional Length of separation zone (Lr) variations against relative unit discharge per width (qr) in present study compared with other methods.
Figure 9 | Velocity profiles for various roughness coefficients along turn-out width.
Figure 9 | Velocity profiles for various roughness coefficients along turn-out width.
Figure 10 | Effect of roughness on sepration zone dimensions in numerical study
Figure 10 | Effect of roughness on sepration zone dimensions in numerical study
Figure 11 | Comparision of the vortex area (software output) with three roughness (0.009, 0.023 and 0.032).
Figure 11 | Comparision of the vortex area (software output) with three roughness (0.009, 0.023 and 0.032).
Figure 12 | Comparison of vortex area in 3D mode (tecplot output) with two roughness (a) 0.009 and (b) 0.032
Figure 12 | Comparison of vortex area in 3D mode (tecplot output) with two roughness (a) 0.009 and (b) 0.032
Figure 13 | Velocity vector for flow condition Q¼22 l/s, Near surface.
Figure 13 | Velocity vector for flow condition Q¼22 l/s, Near surface.
Figure 14 | Exprimental and numerical measured velocity.
Figure 14 | Exprimental and numerical measured velocity.

REFERENCES

Abbasi, A., Ghodsian, M., Habibi, M. & Salehi Neishabouri, S. A. 2004 Experimental investigation on dimensions of flow separation zone at
lateral intakeentrance. Research & Construction; Pajouhesh va Sazandegi (in Persian) 62, 38–44.
Al-Zubaidy, R. & Hilo, A. 2021 Numerical investigation of flow behavior at the lateral intake using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD).
Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.172.
Jalili, H., Hosseinzadeh Dalir, A. & Farsadizadeh, D. 2011 Effect of intake geometry on the sediment transport and flow pattern at lateral.
Iranian Water Research Journal(InPersian) 5 (9), 1–10.
Jamshidi, A., Farsadizadeh, D. & Hosseinzadeh Dalir, A. 2016 Variations of flow separation zone at lateral intakes entrance using submerged
vanes. Journal of Civil Engineering Urban 6 (3), 54–63. Journal homepage. Available from: www.ojceu.ir/main.
Karami Moghaddam, K. & Keshavarzi, A. 2007 Investigation of flow structure in lateral intakes 55° and 900
° with rounded entrance edge.
In: 03 National Congress on Civil Engineering University of Tabriz. (In Persian). Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/16317.
Karami, H., Farzin, S., Sadrabadi, M. T. & Moazeni, H. 2017 Simulation of flow pattern at rectangular lateral intake with different dike and
submerged vane scenarios. Journal of Water Science and Engineering 10 (3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2017.10.001.
Kasthuri, B. & Pundarikanthan, N. V. 1987 Discussion on separation zone at open- channel junction. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
113 (4), 543–548.
Keshavarzi, A. & Habibi, L. 2005 Optimizing water intake angle by flow separation analysis. Journal of Irrigation and Drain 54, 543–552.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.207.
Kirkgöz, M. S. & Ardiçlioğ
lu, M. 1997 Velocity profiles of developing and developed open channel flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
1099–1105. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:12(1099).
Nakato, T., Kennedy, J. F. & Bauerly, D. 1990 Pumpstation intake-shoaling control with submerge vanes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:1(119).

Neary, V. S., Sotiropoulos, F. & Odgaard, A. J. 1999 Three-dimensional numerical model of lateral-intake in flows. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:2(126).
Nikbin, S. & Borghei, S. M. 2011 Experimental investigation of submerged vanes effect on dimensions of flow separation zone at 90°
openchannel junction. In: 06rd National Congress on Civil Engineering University of Semnan. (In Persian). Available from: https://
civilica.com/doc/120494.
Odgaard, J. A. & Wang, Y. 1991 Sediment management with submerged vanes, I: theory. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 117 (3), 267–283.
Ouyang, H. T. 2009 Investigation on the dimensions and shape of a submerged vane for sediment management in alluvial channels. Journal of
Hydraulic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2009)135:3(209).
Ramamurthy, A. S., Junying, Q. & Diep, V. 2007 Numerical and experimental study of dividing open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:10(1135).
Samimi Behbahan, T. 2011 Laboratory investigation of submerged vane shapes effect on river banks protection. Australian Journal of Basic
and Applied Sciences 5 (12), 1402–1407.
Seyedian, S., Karami Moghaddam, K. & Shafai Begestan, M. 2008 Determine the optimal radius in lateral intakes 55° and 90° using variation
of flow velocity. In: 07th Iranian Hydraulic Conference. Power & Water University of Technology (PWUT) (in Persian). Available from:
https://civilica.com/doc/56251.
Zolghadr, M. & Shafai Bejestan, M. 2020 Six legged concrete (SLC) elements as scour countermeasures at wing wall bridge abutments.
International Journal of River Basin Management. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2020.1726357.
Zolghadr, M., Zomorodian, S. M. A., Shabani, R. & Azamatulla Md., H. 2020 Migration of sand mining pit in rivers: an experimental,
numerical and case study. Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108944.