Figure 4. Field gate discharge experiment.

하류 유압 구조물의 유동 특성 분석을 위한 FLOW-3D 모델 개발

Beom-Jin Kim 1, Jae-Hong Hwang 2 and Byunghyun Kim 3,*
1 Advanced Structures and Seismic Safety Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute,
Daejeon 34057, Korea
2 Korea Water Resources Corporation (K-Water), Daejeon 34350, Korea
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea

  • Correspondence:; Tel.: +82-53-950-7819


Hydraulic structures installed in rivers inevitably create a water level difference between upstream and downstream regions. The potential energy due to this difference in water level is converted into kinetic energy, causing high-velocity flow and hydraulic jumps in the river. As a result, problems such as scouring and sloping downstream may occur around the hydraulic structures. In this study, a FLOW-3D model was constructed to perform a numerical analysis of the ChangnyeongHaman weir in the Republic of Korea. The constructed model was verified based on surface velocity measurements from a field gate operation experiment. In the simulation results, the flow discharge differed from the measured value by 9–15 m3/s, from which the accuracy was evaluated to be 82–87%. The flow velocity was evaluated with an accuracy of 92% from a difference of 0.01 to 0.16 m/s. Following this verification, a flow analysis of the hydraulic structures was performed according to boundary conditions and operation conditions for numerous scenarios. Since 2018, the ChangnyeongHaman weir gate has been fully opened due to the implementation of Korea’s eco-environmental policy; therefore, in this study, the actual gate operation history data prior to 2018 was applied and evaluated. The evaluation conditions were a 50% open gate condition and the flow discharge of two cases with a large difference in water level. As a result of the analysis, the actual operating conditions showed that the velocity and the Froude number were lower than the optimal conditions, confirming that the selected design was appropriate. It was also found that in the bed protection section, the average flow velocity was high when the water level difference was large, whereas the bottom velocity was high when the gate opening was large. Ultimately, through the reviewed status survey data in this study, the downstream flow characteristics of hydraulic structures along with adequacy verification techniques, optimal design techniques such as procedures for design, and important considerations were derived. Based on the current results, the constructed FLOW-3D-based model can be applied to creating or updating flow analysis guidelines for future repair and reinforcement measures as well as hydraulic structure design.

하천에 설치되는 수력구조물은 필연적으로 상류와 하류의 수위차를 발생시킨다. 이러한 수위차로 인한 위치에너지는 운동에너지로 변환되어 하천의 고속유동과 수압점프를 일으킨다. 그 결과 수력구조물 주변에서 하류의 세굴, 경사 등의 문제가 발생할 수 있다.

본 연구에서는 대한민국 창녕함안보의 수치해석을 위해 FLOW-3D 모델을 구축하였다. 구축된 모델은 현장 게이트 작동 실험에서 표면 속도 측정을 기반으로 검증되었습니다.

시뮬레이션 결과에서 유량은 측정값과 9~15 m3/s 차이가 나고 정확도는 82~87%로 평가되었다. 유속은 0.01~0.16m/s의 차이에서 92%의 정확도로 평가되었습니다.

검증 후 다양한 시나리오에 대한 경계조건 및 운전조건에 따른 수리구조물의 유동해석을 수행하였다. 2018년부터 창녕함안보 문은 한국의 친환경 정책 시행으로 전면 개방되었습니다.

따라서 본 연구에서는 2018년 이전의 실제 게이트 운영 이력 데이터를 적용하여 평가하였다. 평가조건은 50% open gate 조건과 수위차가 큰 2가지 경우의 유수방류로 하였다. 해석 결과 실제 운전조건은 속도와 Froude수가 최적조건보다 낮아 선정된 설계가 적합함을 확인하였다.

또한 베드보호구간에서는 수위차가 크면 평균유속이 높고, 수문개구가 크면 저저유속이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 최종적으로 본 연구에서 검토한 실태조사 자료를 통해 적정성 검증기법과 함께 수력구조물의 하류 유동특성, 설계절차 등 최적 설계기법 및 중요 고려사항을 도출하였다.

현재의 결과를 바탕으로 구축된 FLOW-3D 기반 모델은 수력구조 설계뿐만 아니라 향후 보수 및 보강 조치를 위한 유동해석 가이드라인 생성 또는 업데이트에 적용할 수 있습니다.

Figure 1. Effect of downstream riverbed erosion according to the type of weir foundation.
Figure 1. Effect of downstream riverbed erosion according to the type of weir foundation.
Figure 2. Changnyeong-Haman weir depth survey results (June 2015)
Figure 2. Changnyeong-Haman weir depth survey results (June 2015)
Figure 4. Field gate discharge experiment.
Figure 4. Field gate discharge experiment.
Figure 16. Analysis results for Case 7 and Case 8
Figure 16. Analysis results for Case 7 and Case 8


  1. Wanoschek, R.; Hager, W.H. Hydraulic jump in trapezoidal channel. J. Hydraul. Res. 1989, 27, 429–446. [CrossRef]
  2. Bohr, T.; Dimon, P.; Putkaradze, V. Shallow-water approach to the circular hydraulic jump. J. Fluid Mech. 1993, 254, 635–648.
  3. Chanson, H.; Brattberg, T. Experimental study of the air–water shear flow in a hydraulic jump. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 2000, 26,
    583–607. [CrossRef]
  4. Dhamotharan, S.; Gulliver, J.S.; Stefan, H.G. Unsteady one-dimensional settling of suspended sediment. Water Resour. Res. 1981,
    17, 1125–1132. [CrossRef]
  5. Ziegler, C.K.; Nisbet, B.S. Long-term simulation of fine-grained sediment transport in large reservoir. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1995, 121,
    773–781. [CrossRef]
  6. Olsen, N.R.B. Two-dimensional numerical modelling of flushing processes in water reservoirs. J. Hydraul. Res. 1999, 37, 3–16.
  7. Saad, N.Y.; Fattouh, E.M. Hydraulic characteristics of flow over weirs with circular openings. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2017, 8, 515–522.
  8. Bagheri, S.; Kabiri-Samani, A.R. Hydraulic Characteristics of flow over the streamlined weirs. Modares Civ. Eng. J. 2018, 17, 29–42.
  9. Hussain, Z.; Khan, S.; Ullah, A.; Ayaz, M.; Ahmad, I.; Mashwani, W.K.; Chu, Y.-M. Extension of optimal homotopy asymptotic
    method with use of Daftardar–Jeffery polynomials to Hirota–Satsuma coupled system of Korteweg–de Vries equations. Open
    Phys. 2020, 18, 916–924. [CrossRef]
  10. Arifeen, S.U.; Haq, S.; Ghafoor, A.; Ullah, A.; Kumam, P.; Chaipanya, P. Numerical solutions of higher order boundary value
    problems via wavelet approach. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 2021, 347. [CrossRef]
  11. Sharafati, A.; Haghbin, M.; Motta, D.; Yaseen, Z.M. The application of soft computing models and empirical formulations for
    hydraulic structure scouring depth simulation: A comprehensive review, assessment and possible future research direction. Arch.
    Comput. Methods Eng. 2021, 28, 423–447. [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, S.; Selim, M.M.; Khan, A.; Ullah, A.; Abdeljawad, T.; Ayaz, M.; Mashwani, W.K. On the analysis of the non-Newtonian
    fluid flow past a stretching/shrinking permeable surface with heat and mass transfer. Coatings 2021, 11, 566. [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, S.; Selim, M.M.; Gepreel, K.A.; Ullah, A.; Ayaz, M.; Mashwani, W.K.; Khan, E. An analytical investigation of the mixed
    convective Casson fluid flow past a yawed cylinder with heat transfer analysis. Open Phys. 2021, 19, 341–351. [CrossRef]
  14. Ullah, A.; Selim, M.M.; Abdeljawad, T.; Ayaz, M.; Mlaiki, N.; Ghafoor, A. A Magnetite–Water-Based Nanofluid Three-Dimensional
    Thin Film Flow on an Inclined Rotating Surface with Non-Linear Thermal Radiations and Couple Stress Effects. Energies 2021,
    14, 5531. [CrossRef]
  15. Aamir, M.; Ahmad, Z.; Pandey, M.; Khan, M.A.; Aldrees, A.; Mohamed, A. The Effect of Rough Rigid Apron on Scour Downstream
    of Sluice Gates. Water 2022, 14, 2223. [CrossRef]
  16. Gharebagh, B.A.; Bazargan, J.; Mohammadi, M. Experimental Investigation of Bed Scour Rate in Flood Conditions. Environ. Water
    Eng. 2022, in press. [CrossRef]
  17. Laishram, K.; Devi, T.T.; Singh, N.B. Experimental Comparison of Hydraulic Jump Characteristics and Energy Dissipation
    Between Sluice Gate and Radial Gate. In Innovative Trends in Hydrological and Environmental Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg,
    Germany, 2022; pp. 207–218.
  18. Varaki, M.E.; Sedaghati, M.; Sabet, B.S. Effect of apron length on local scour at the downstream of grade control structures with
    labyrinth planform. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 1240. [CrossRef]
  19. Rizk, D.; Ullah, A.; Elattar, S.; Alharbi, K.A.M.; Sohail, M.; Khan, R.; Khan, A.; Mlaiki, N. Impact of the KKL Correlation Model on
    the Activation of Thermal Energy for the Hybrid Nanofluid (GO+ ZnO+ Water) Flow through Permeable Vertically Rotating
    Surface. Energies 2022, 15, 2872. [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, K.H.; Choi, G.W.; Jo, J.B. An Experimental Study on the Stream Flow by Discharge Ratio. Korea Water Resour. Assoc. Acad.
    Conf. 2005, 05b, 377–382.
  21. Lee, D.S.; Yeo, H.G. An Experimental Study for Determination of the Material Diameter of Riprap Bed Protection Structure. Korea
    Water Resour. Assoc. Acad. Conf. 2005, 05b, 1036–1039.
  22. Choi, G.W.; Byeon, S.J.; Kim, Y.G.; Cho, S.U. The Flow Characteristic Variation by Installing a Movable Weir having Water
    Drainage Equipment on the Bottom. J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig. 2008, 8, 117–122.
  23. Jung, J.G. An Experimental Study for Estimation of Bed Protection Length. J. Korean Wetl. Soc. 2011, 13, 677–686.
  24. Kim, S.H.; Kim, W.; Lee, E.R.; Choi, G.H. Analysis of Hydraulic Effects of Singok Submerged Weir in the Lower Han River. J.
    Korean Water Resour. Assoc. 2005, 38, 401–413. [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, J.H.; Sim, M.P.; Choi, G.W.; Oh, J.M. Hydraulic Analysis of Air Entrainment by Weir Types. J. Korean Water Resour. Assoc.
    2003, 36, 971–984. [CrossRef]
  26. Jeong, S.; Yeo, C.G.; Yun, G.S.; Lee, S.O. Analysis of Characteristics for Bank Scour around Low Dam using 3D Numerical
    Simulation. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig. Acad. Conf. 2011, 02a, 102.
  27. Son, A.R.; Kim, B.H.; Moon, B.R.; Han, G.Y. An Analysis of Bed Change Characteristics by Bed Protection Work. J. Korean Soc. Civ.
    Eng. 2015, 35, 821–834.
  28. French, R.H.; French, R.H. Open-Channel Hydraulics; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1985; ISBN 0070221340.