Modeling of contactless bubble–bubble interactions in microchannels with integrated inertial pumps

통합 관성 펌프를 사용하여 마이크로 채널에서 비접촉식 기포-기포 상호 작용 모델링

Physics of Fluids 33, 042002 (2021); B. Hayesa) G. L. Whitingb), and  R. MacCurdyc)


In this study, the nonlinear effect of contactless bubble–bubble interactions in inertial micropumps is characterized via reduced parameter one-dimensional and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (3D CFD) modeling. A one-dimensional pump model is developed to account for contactless bubble-bubble interactions, and the accuracy of the developed one-dimensional model is assessed via the commercial volume of fluid CFD software, FLOW-3D. The FLOW-3D CFD model is validated against experimental bubble dynamics images as well as experimental pump data. Precollapse and postcollapse bubble and flow dynamics for two resistors in a channel have been successfully explained by the modified one-dimensional model. The net pumping effect design space is characterized as a function of resistor placement and firing time delay. The one-dimensional model accurately predicts cumulative flow for simultaneous resistor firing with inner-channel resistor placements (0.2L < x < 0.8L where L is the channel length) as well as delayed resistor firing with inner-channel resistor placements when the time delay is greater than the time required for the vapor bubble to fill the channel cross section. In general, one-dimensional model accuracy suffers at near-reservoir resistor placements and short time delays which we propose is a result of 3D bubble-reservoir interactions and transverse bubble growth interactions, respectively, that are not captured by the one-dimensional model. We find that the one-dimensional model accuracy improves for smaller channel heights. We envision the developed one-dimensional model as a first-order rapid design tool for inertial pump-based microfluidic systems operating in the contactless bubble–bubble interaction nonlinear regime

이 연구에서 관성 마이크로 펌프에서 비접촉 기포-기포 상호 작용의 비선형 효과는 감소 된 매개 변수 1 차원 및 3 차원 전산 유체 역학 (3D CFD) 모델링을 통해 특성화됩니다. 비접촉식 기포-버블 상호 작용을 설명하기 위해 1 차원 펌프 모델이 개발되었으며, 개발 된 1 차원 모델의 정확도는 유체 CFD 소프트웨어 인 FLOW-3D의 상용 볼륨을 통해 평가됩니다.

FLOW-3D CFD 모델은 실험적인 거품 역학 이미지와 실험적인 펌프 데이터에 대해 검증되었습니다. 채널에 있는 두 저항기의 붕괴 전 및 붕괴 후 기포 및 유동 역학은 수정 된 1 차원 모델에 의해 성공적으로 설명되었습니다. 순 펌핑 효과 설계 공간은 저항 배치 및 발사 시간 지연의 기능으로 특징 지어집니다.

1 차원 모델은 내부 채널 저항 배치 (0.2L <x <0.8L, 여기서 L은 채널 길이)로 동시 저항 발생에 대한 누적 흐름과 시간 지연시 내부 채널 저항 배치로 지연된 저항 발생을 정확하게 예측합니다. 증기 방울이 채널 단면을 채우는 데 필요한 시간보다 큽니다.

일반적으로 1 차원 모델 정확도는 저수지 근처의 저항 배치와 1 차원 모델에 의해 포착되지 않는 3D 기포-저수지 상호 작용 및 가로 기포 성장 상호 작용의 결과 인 짧은 시간 지연에서 어려움을 겪습니다. 채널 높이가 작을수록 1 차원 모델 정확도가 향상됩니다. 우리는 개발 된 1 차원 모델을 비접촉 기포-기포 상호 작용 비선형 영역에서 작동하는 관성 펌프 기반 미세 유체 시스템을 위한 1 차 빠른 설계 도구로 생각합니다.


1.S. Hassan and X. Zhang, “ Design and fabrication of capillary-driven flow device for point-of-care diagnostics,” Biosensors 10, 39 (2020)., Google ScholarCrossref
2.Q. Shizhi and H. Bau, “ Magneto-hydrodynamics based microfluidics,” Mech. Res. Commun. 36, 10 (2009)., Google ScholarCrossref
3.N. Mishchuk, T. Heldal, T. Volden, J. Auerswald, and H. Knapp, “ Micropump based on electroosmosis of the second kind,” Electrophoresis 30, 3499 (2009)., Google ScholarCrossref
4.J. Snyder, J. Getpreecharsawas, D. Fang, T. Gaborski, C. Striemer, P. Fauchet, D. Borkholder, and J. McGrath, “ High-performance, low-voltage electroosmotic pumps with molecularly thin silicon nanomembranes,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 18425–18430 (2013)., Google ScholarCrossref
5.K. Vinayakumar, G. Nadiger, V. Shetty, S. Dinesh, M. Nayak, and K. Rajanna, “ Packaged peristaltic micropump for controlled drug delivery application,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 015102 (2017)., Google ScholarScitation, ISI
6.D. Duffy, H. Gillis, J. Lin, N. Sheppard, and G. Kellogg, “ Microfabricated centrifugal microfluidic systems: Characterization and multiple enzymatic assays,” Anal. Chem. 71, 4669 (1999)., Google ScholarCrossref
7.V. Gnyawali, M. Saremi, M. Kolios, and S. Tsai, “ Stable microfluidic flow focusing using hydrostatics,” Biomicrofluidics 11, 034104 (2017)., Google ScholarScitation, ISI
8.J. Lake, K. Heyde, and W. Ruder, “ Low-cost feedback-controlled syringe pressure pumps for microfluidics applications,” PLoS One 12, e0175089 (2017)., Google ScholarCrossref
9.M. I. Mohammed, S. Haswell, and I. Gibson, “ Lab-on-a-chip or chip-in-a-lab: Challenges of commercialization lost in translation,” Procedia Technology 20, 54–59 (2015), proceedings of The 1st International Design Technology Conference, DESTECH2015, Geelong. Google ScholarCrossref
10.E. Torniainen, A. Govyadinov, D. Markel, and P. Kornilovitch, “ Bubble-driven inertial micropump,” Phys. Fluids 24, 122003 (2012)., Google ScholarScitation, ISI
11.H. Hoefemann, S. Wadle, N. Bakhtina, V. Kondrashov, N. Wangler, and R. Zengerle, “ Sorting and lysis of single cells by bubblejet technology,” Sens. Actuators, B 168, 442–445 (2012)., Google ScholarCrossref
12.B. Hayes, A. Hayes, M. Rolleston, A. Ferreira, and J. Kirsher, “ Pulsatory mixing of laminar flow using bubble-driven micro-pumps,” in Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (2018), Vol. 7. Google ScholarCrossref
13.E. Ory, H. Yuan, A. Prosperetti, S. Popinet, and S. Zaleski, “ Growth and collapse of a vapor bubble in a narrow tube,” Phys. Fluids 12, 1268 (2000)., Google ScholarScitation, ISI
14.Z. Yin and A. Prosperetti, “‘ Blinking bubble’ micropump with microfabricated heaters,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 15, 1683 (2005)., Google ScholarCrossref
15.M. Einat and M. Grajower, “ Microboiling measurements of thermal-inkjet heaters,” J. Microelectromech. Syst. 19, 391 (2010)., Google ScholarCrossref
16.A. Govyadinov, P. Kornilovitch, D. Markel, and E. Torniainen, “ Single-pulse dynamics and flow rates of inertial micropumps,” Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20, 73 (2016)., Google ScholarCrossref
17.E. Sourtiji and Y. Peles, “ A micro-synthetic jet in a microchannel using bubble growth and collapse,” Appl. Therm. Eng. 160, 114084 (2019)., Google ScholarCrossref
18.B. Hayes, A. Govyadinov, and P. Kornilovitch, “ Microfluidic switchboards with integrated inertial pumps,” Microfluid. Nanofluid. 22, 15 (2018)., Google ScholarCrossref
19.P. Kornilovitch, A. Govyadinov, D. Markel, and E. Torniainen, “ One-dimensional model of inertial pumping,” Phys. Rev. E 87, 023012 (2013)., Google ScholarCrossref
20.H. Yuan and A. Prosperetti, “ The pumping effect of growing and collapsing bubbles in a tube,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 9, 402–413 (1999)., Google ScholarCrossref
21.J. Zou, B. Li, and C. Ji, “ Interactions between two oscillating bubbles in a rigid tube,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 61, 105 (2015)., Google ScholarCrossref
22.C. Hirt and B. Nichols, “ Volume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries,” J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201–225 (1981)., Google ScholarCrossref
23.C. Borgnakke and R. E. Sonntag, Fundamentals of Thermodynamics, 8th ed. ( Wiley, 1999). Google Scholar
24.O. E. Ruiz, “ CFD model of the thermal inkjet droplet ejection process,” in Proceeding of Heat Transfer Summer Conference (2007), Vol. 3. Google ScholarCrossref
25.T. Theofanous, L. Biasi, H. Isbin, and H. Fauske, “ A theoretical study on bubble growth in constant and time-dependent pressure fields,” Chem. Eng. Sci. 24, 885–897 (1969)., Google ScholarCrossref
26.S. Timoshenko and J. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. ( McGaw-Hill, Inc., 1970). Google Scholar