Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering (ICCOEE2020)

미 임계 흐름에서 소형 승용차의 부동 불안정성을 평가하기 위한 수치 시뮬레이션

Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering
ICCOEE 2021: ICCOEE2020 pp 258-265| Cite as

  • Ebrahim Hamid Hussein Al-Qadami
  • Zahiraniza Mustaffa
  • Eduardo Martínez-Gomariz
  • Khamaruzaman Wan Yusof
  • Abdurrasheed S. Abdurrasheed
  • Syed Muzzamil Hussain Shah

Conference paperFirst Online: 01 January 2021

  • 355Downloads

Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 132)


Parked vehicles can be directly affected by the floods and at a certain flow velocity and depth, vehicles can be easily swept away. Therefore, studying flooded vehicles stability limits is required. Herein, an attempt has been done to assess numerically the floating instability mode of a small passenger car with a scaled-down ratio of 1:10 using FLOW-3D. The 3D car model was placed inside a closed box and the six degrees of freedom numerical simulation was conducted. Later, numerical results validated experimentally and analytically. Results showed that buoyancy depths were 3.6 and 3.8 cm numerically and experimentally, respectively with a percentage difference of 5.4%. Further, the buoyancy forces were 8.95 N and 8.97 N numerically and analytically, respectively with a percentage difference of 0.2%. With this small difference, it can be concluded that the numerical modeling for such cases using FLOW-3D software can give an acceptable prediction on the vehicle stability limits.

주차된 차량은 홍수의 직접적인 영향을 받을 수 있으며 특정 유속과 깊이에서 차량을 쉽게 쓸어 버릴 수 있습니다. 따라서 침수 차량 안정성 한계를 연구해야 합니다. 여기에서는 FLOW-3D를 사용하여 축소 비율이 1:10 인 소형 승용차의 부동 불안정 모드를 수치 적으로 평가하려는 시도가 이루어졌습니다. 3D 자동차 모델은 닫힌 상자 안에 배치되었고 6 개의 자유도 수치 시뮬레이션이 수행되었습니다. 나중에 수치 결과는 실험적으로 그리고 분석적으로 검증되었습니다. 결과는 부력 깊이가 각각 5.4 %의 백분율 차이로 수치 및 실험적으로 3.6 및 3.8 cm임을 보여 주었다. 또한 부력은 수치적으로 8.95N과 분석적으로 8.97N이었고 백분율 차이는 0.2 %였다. 이 작은 차이로 인해 FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용한 이러한 경우의 수치 모델링은 차량 안정성 한계에 대한 허용 가능한 예측을 제공 할 수 있다는 결론을 내릴 수 있습니다.


Floating instability Small passenger car Numerical simulation FLOW-3D Subcritical flowe 


  1. 1.Hung, C.L.J., James, L.A., Carbone, G.J., Williams, J.M.: Impacts of combined land-use and climate change on streamflow in two nested catchments in the southeastern united states. Ecol. Eng. 143, 105665 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Bui, D.T., Hoang, N.D., Martínez-Álvarez, F., Ngo, P.T.T., Hoa, P.V., Pham, T.D., Samui, P., Costache, R.: A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: a case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Sci. Total Environ. 701, 134413 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Shah, S.M.H., Mustaffa, Z., Martínez-Gomariz, E., Yusof, K.W., Al-Qadami, E.H.H.: A review of safety guidelines for vehicles in floodwaters. Int. J. River Basin Manage. 1–17 (2019)Google Scholar
  4. 4.Shah, S.M.H., Mustaffa, Z., Yusof, K.W.: Disasters worldwide and floods in the malaysian region: a brief review. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 10(2), (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.Xia, J., Falconer, R.A., Lin, B., Tan, G.: Numerical assessment of flood hazard risk to people and vehicles in flash floods. Environ. Model Softw. 26(8), 987–998 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Bonham, A.J., Hattersley, R.T.: Low level causeways. Technical report, University of New South Wales, Water Research Laboratory (1967)Google Scholar
  7. 7.Gordon, A.D., Stone, P.B.: Car stability on road causeways. Technical report No. 73/12, Institution (1973)Google Scholar
  8. 8.Keller, R.J., Mitsch, B.: Safety aspects of the design of roadways as floodways. Research Report No. 69, Urban Water Research Association of Australia, Melbourne (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.Shah, S.M.H., Mustaffa, Z., Martinez-Gomariz, E., Kim, D.K., Yusof, K.W.: Criterion of vehicle instability in floodwaters: past, present and future. Int. J. River Basin Manage. 1–23 (2019)Google Scholar
  10. 10.Teo, F.Y.: Study of the hydrodynamic processes Ofrivers and flood- plains with obstructions. Ph.D. thesis (2010).
  11. 11.Xia, J., Teo, F.Y., Lin, B., Falconer, R.A.: Formula of incipient velocity for flooded vehicles. Nat. Hazards 58(1), 1–14 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Shu, C., Xia, J., Falconer, R.A., Lin, B.: Incipient velocity for partially submerged vehicles in floodwaters. J. Hydraul. Res. 49(6), 709–717 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Toda, K., Ishigaki, T., Ozaki, T.: Experiments study on floating car in flooding. In: International Conference on Flood Resilience: Experiences in Asia and Europe (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.Xia, J., Falconer, R.A., Xiao, X., Wang, Y.: Criterion of vehicle stability in floodwaters based on theoretical and experimental studies. Nat. Hazards 70(2), 1619–1630 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Martínez-Gomariz, E., Gómez, M., Russo, B., Djordjević, S.: A new experiments-based methodology to define the stability threshold for any vehicle exposed to flooding. Urban Water J. 14(9), 930–939 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Smith, G.P., Modra, B.D., Tucker, T.A., Cox, R.J.: Vehicle stability testing for flood flows. Technical report 7, Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.Xia, J., Falconer, R.A., Lin, B., Tan, G.: Modelling flash flood risk in urban areas. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, vol. 164 (6), pp. 267–282. Thomas Telford Ltd, (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.Arrighi, C., Alcèrreca-Huerta, J.C., Oumeraci, H., Castelli, F.: Drag and lift contribution to the incipient motion of partly submerged flooded vehicles. J. Fluids Struct. 57, 170–184 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Gómez, M., Martínez, E., Russo, B.: Experimental and numerical study of stability of vehicles exposed to flooding. In: Advances in Hydroinformatics, pp. 595–605. Springer, Singapore (2018).
  20. 20.Al-Qadami, E.H.H., Abdurrasheed, A.S.I., Mustaffa, Z., Yusof, K.W., Malek, M.A., Ab Ghani, A.: Numerical modelling of flow characteristics over sharp crested triangular hump. Results Eng. 4, 100052 (2019)Google Scholar