The distribution of the computed maximum current speed during the entire duration of the NAMI DANCE and FLOW-3D simulations. The resolution of computational domain is 10 m

NTHMP 벤치마크 문제를 사용하여 쓰나미 전파, 침수 및 해류에서 NAMI DANCE 및 FLOW-3D® 모델의 성능 비교

Pure and Applied Geophysics volume 176, pages3115–3153 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Field observations provide valuable data regarding nearshore tsunami impact, yet only in inundation areas where tsunami waves have already flooded. Therefore, tsunami modeling is essential to understand tsunami behavior and prepare for tsunami inundation. It is necessary that all numerical models used in tsunami emergency planning be subject to benchmark tests for validation and verification. This study focuses on two numerical codes, NAMI DANCE and FLOW-3D®, for validation and performance comparison. NAMI DANCE is an in-house tsunami numerical model developed by the Ocean Engineering Research Center of Middle East Technical University, Turkey and Laboratory of Special Research Bureau for Automation of Marine Research, Russia. FLOW-3D® is a general purpose computational fluid dynamics software, which was developed by scientists who pioneered in the design of the Volume-of-Fluid technique. The codes are validated and their performances are compared via analytical, experimental and field benchmark problems, which are documented in the ‘‘Proceedings and Results of the 2011 National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program (NTHMP) Model Benchmarking Workshop’’ and the ‘‘Proceedings and Results of the NTHMP 2015 Tsunami Current Modeling Workshop”. The variations between the numerical solutions of these two models are evaluated through statistical error analysis.

현장 관찰은 연안 쓰나미 영향에 관한 귀중한 데이터를 제공하지만 쓰나미 파도가 이미 범람한 침수 지역에서만 가능합니다. 따라서 쓰나미 모델링은 쓰나미 행동을 이해하고 쓰나미 범람에 대비하는 데 필수적입니다.

쓰나미 비상 계획에 사용되는 모든 수치 모델은 검증 및 검증을 위한 벤치마크 테스트를 받아야 합니다. 이 연구는 검증 및 성능 비교를 위해 NAMI DANCE 및 FLOW-3D®의 두 가지 숫자 코드에 중점을 둡니다.

NAMI DANCE는 터키 중동 기술 대학의 해양 공학 연구 센터와 러시아 해양 연구 자동화를 위한 특별 조사국 연구소에서 개발한 사내 쓰나미 수치 모델입니다. FLOW-3D®는 Volume-of-Fluid 기술의 설계를 개척한 과학자들이 개발한 범용 전산 유체 역학 소프트웨어입니다.

코드의 유효성이 검증되고 분석, 실험 및 현장 벤치마크 문제를 통해 코드의 성능이 비교되며, 이는 ‘2011년 NTHMP(National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program) 모델 벤치마킹 워크숍의 절차 및 결과’와 ”절차 및 NTHMP 2015 쓰나미 현재 모델링 워크숍 결과”. 이 두 모델의 수치 해 사이의 변동은 통계적 오류 분석을 통해 평가됩니다.

The distribution of the computed maximum current speed during the entire duration of the NAMI DANCE and FLOW-3D simulations. The resolution of computational domain is 10 m
The distribution of the computed maximum current speed during the entire duration of the NAMI DANCE and FLOW-3D simulations. The resolution of computational domain is 10 m

References

  • Allan, J. C., Komar, P. D., Ruggiero, P., & Witter, R. (2012). The March 2011 Tohoku tsunami and its impacts along the U.S. West Coast. Journal of Coastal Research, 28(5), 1142–1153. https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-11-00115.1.Article Google Scholar 
  • Apotsos, A., Buckley, M., Gelfenbaum, G., Jafe, B., & Vatvani, D. (2011). Nearshore tsunami inundation and sediment transport modeling: towards model validation and application. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 168(11), 2097–2119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0291-5.Article Google Scholar 
  • Barberopoulou, A., Legg, M. R., & Gica, E. (2015). Time evolution of man-made harbor modifications in San Diego: effects on Tsunamis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 3, 1382–1403.Article Google Scholar 
  • Basu, D., Green, S., Das, K., Janetzke, R. and Stamatakos, J. (2009). Numerical Simulation of Surface Waves Generated by a Subaerial Landslide at Lituya Bay, Alaska. Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  • Briggs, M. J., Synolakis, C. E., Harkins, G. S., & Green, D. R. (1995). Laboratory experiments of tsunami run-up on a circular island. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 144(3/4), 569–593.Article Google Scholar 
  • Cheung, K. F., Bai, Y., & Yamazaki, Y. (2013). Surges around the Hawaiian Islands from the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118, 5703–5719. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20413.Google Scholar 
  • Choi, B. H., Dong, C. K., Pelinovsky, E., & Woo, S. B. (2007). Three-dimensional Simulation of Tsunami Run-up Around Conical Island. Coastal Engineering, 54, 618–629.Article Google Scholar 
  • Cox, D., T. Tomita, P. Lynett, R.A., Holman. (2008). Tsunami Inundation with Macroroughness in the Constructed Environment. Proceedings of 31st International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ASCE, pp. 1421–1432.
  • Flow Science. (2002). FLOW-3D User’s Manual.
  • Hirt, C. W., & Nichols, B. D. (1981). Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39, 201–225.Article Google Scholar 
  • Horrillo, J., Grilli, S. T., Nicolsky, D., Roeber, V., & Zang, J. (2015). Performance benchmarking Tsunami models for NTHMP’s inundation mapping activities. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172, 869–884.Article Google Scholar 
  • http://nws.weather.gov/nthmp/documents/nthmpWorkshopProcMerged.pdf.
  • http://nws.weather.gov/nthmp/documents/NTHMP_Currents_Workshop_Report.pdf.
  • Kim, K. O., Kim, D. C., Choi, B.-H., Jung, T. K., Yuk, J. H., & Pelinovsky, E. (2015). The role of diffraction effects in extreme run-up inundation at Okushiri Island due to 1993 Tsunami. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 15, 747–755.Article Google Scholar 
  • Liu, P. L.-F. (1994). Model equations for wave propagations from deep to shallow water. (P.-F. Liu, Ed.) Advances in Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 1, 125–158.
  • Liu, P. L.-F., Yeh, H., & Synolakis, C. E. (2008). Advanced numerical models for simulating Tsunami waves and run-up. Advances in Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 10, 344.Google Scholar 
  • Lynett, P. J., Borrero, J., Son, S., Wilson, R., & Miller, K. (2014). Assessment of the tsunami-induced current hazard. Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 2048–2055. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058680.Article Google Scholar 
  • Lynett, P. J., Gately, K., Wilson, R., Montoya, L., Arcas, D., Aytore, B., et al. (2017). Inter-model analysis of Tsunami-induced coastal currents. Ocean Modelling, 114, 14–32.Article Google Scholar 
  • Lynett, P. J., Wu, T.-R., & Liu, P. L.-F. (2002). Modeling wave run-up with depth-integrated equations. Coastal Engineering, 46(2), 89–107.Article Google Scholar 
  • Macias, J., Castro, M. J., Ortega, S., Escalante, C., & Gonzalez-Vida, J. M. (2017). Performance benchmarking of Tsunami-HySEA model for nthmp’s inundation mapping activities. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174, 3147–3183.Article Google Scholar 
  • Matsuyama, M., & Tanaka, H. (2001). An experimental study of the highest run-up height in the 1993 Hokkaidō Nansei-Oki Earthquake Tsunami. Proceedings of ITS, 2001, 879–889.Google Scholar 
  • National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program. 2012. Proceedings and Results of the 2011 NTHMP Model Benchmarking Workshop. Boulder: U.S. Department of Commerce/NOAA/NTHMP; (NOAA Special Report). p. 436.
  • National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program. (2017). Proceedings and Results of the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program 2015 Tsunami Current Modeling Workshop, February 9-10, 2015, Portland, Oregon: compiled by Patrick Lynett and Rick Wilson, p 194.
  • Necmioglu, O., & Ozel, N. M. (2014). An earthquake source sensitivity analysis for Tsunami propagation in the Eastern Mediterranean. Oceanography, 27(2), 76–85.Article Google Scholar 
  • Nichols, B.D. and Hirt, C.W. (1975). Methods for Calculating Multi-Dimensional, Transient Free Surface Flows Past Bodies. Proceedings of 1st International Conference Num. Ship Hydrodynamics. Gaithersburg.
  • Nicolsky, D. J., Suleimani, E. N., & Hansen, R. A. (2011). Validation and verification of a numerical model for Tsunami propagation and run-up. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 168(6), 1199–1222.Article Google Scholar 
  • NOAA Center for Tsunami Research: Tsunami Run-up onto a Complex Three-dimensional Beach; Monai Valley. (n.d). Retrieved from: https://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/benchmark/Laboratory/Laboratory_MonaiValley/.
  • Park, H., Cox, D. T., Lynett, P. J., Wiebe, D. M., & Shin, S. (2013). Tsunami inundation modeling in constructed environments: a physical and numerical comparison of free-surface elevation, velocity, and momentum flux. Coastal Engineering, 79, 9–21.Article Google Scholar 
  • Patel, V. M., Dholakia, M. B., & Singh, A. P. (2016). Emergency preparedness in the case of Makran Tsunami: a case study on Tsunami risk visualization for the Western Parts of Gujarat, India. Geomatics Natural Hazard and Risk, 7(2), 826–842.Article Google Scholar 
  • Pelinovsky, E., Kim, D.-C., Kim, K.-O., & Choi, B.-H. (2013). Three-dimensional simulation of extreme run-up heights during the 2004 Indonesian and 2011 Japanese Tsunamis. Vienna: EGU General Assembly.Google Scholar 
  • Rueben, M., Holman, R., Cox, D., Shin, S., Killian, J., & Stanley, J. (2011). Optical measurements of Tsunami inundation through an urban waterfront modeled in a large-scale laboratory basin. Coastal Engineering, 58, 229–238.Article Google Scholar 
  • Shuto, N. (1991). Numerical simulation of Tsunamis—its present and near future. Natural Hazards, 4, 171–191.Article Google Scholar 
  • Synolakis, C. E. (1986). The run-up of long waves. Ph.D. Thesis. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
  • Synolakis, C. E., Bernard, E. N., Titov, V. V., Kanoglu, U. & Gonzalez, F. (2007). Standards, criteria, and procedures for NOAA evaluation of Tsunami Numerical Models. 55 p. Seattle, Washington: NOAA OAR Special Report, Contribution No 3053, NOAA/OAR/PMEL.
  • Synolakis, C. E., Bernard, E. N., Titov, V. V., Kanoglu, U., & Gonzalez, F. I. (2008). Validation and verification of Tsunami numerical models. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 165, 2197–2228.Article Google Scholar 
  • Tolkova, E. (2014). Land-water boundary treatment for a tsunami model with dimensional splitting. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171(9), 2289–2314.Article Google Scholar 
  • Velioglu, D. (2017). Advanced two- and three-dimensional Tsunami models: benchmarking and validation. Ph.D. Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Velioglu, D., Kian, R., Yalciner, A.C. and Zaytsev, A. (2016). Performance assessment of NAMI DANCE in Tsunami evolution and currents using a benchmark problem. (R. Signell, Ed.) J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 4(3), 49.
  • Wu, T. (2001). A unified theory for modeling water waves. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 37, 1–88.Article Google Scholar 
  • Wu, N.-J., Hsiao, S.-C., Chen, H.-H., & Yang, R.-Y. (2016). The study on solitary waves generated by a piston-type wave maker. Ocean Engineering, 117, 114–129.Article Google Scholar 
  • Yalciner, A. C., Dogan, P. and Sukru. E. (2005). December 26 2004, Indian Ocean Tsunami Field Survey, North of Sumatra Island. UNESCO.
  • Yalciner, A. C., Gülkan, P., Dilmen, I., Aytore, B., Ayca, A., Insel, I., et al. (2014). Evaluation of Tsunami scenarios For Western Peloponnese, Greece. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 55, 485–500.Google Scholar 
  • Yen, B. C. (1991). Hydraulic resistance in open channels. In B. C. Yen (Ed.), Channel flow resistance: centennial of manning’s formula (pp. 1–135). Highlands Ranch: Water Resource Publications.Google Scholar 
  • Zaitsev, A. I., Kovalev, D. P., Kurkin, A. A., Levin, B. V., Pelinovskii, E. N., Chernov, A. G., et al. (2009). The Tsunami on Sakhalin on August 2, 2007: mareograph evidence and numerical simulation. Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya, 28, 30–35.Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Andrey Zaytsev due to his undeniable contributions to the development of in-house numerical model, NAMI DANCE. The Turkish branch of Flow Science, Inc. is also acknowledged. Finally, the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program (NTHMP), who provided most of the benchmark data, is appreciated. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Deniz Velioglu SogutPresent address: 1212 Computer Science, Department of Civil Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, TurkeyDeniz Velioglu Sogut & Ahmet Cevdet Yalciner

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deniz Velioglu Sogut.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velioglu Sogut, D., Yalciner, A.C. Performance Comparison of NAMI DANCE and FLOW-3D® Models in Tsunami Propagation, Inundation and Currents using NTHMP Benchmark Problems. Pure Appl. Geophys. 176, 3115–3153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1907-9

Download citation

  • Received22 December 2017
  • Revised16 May 2018
  • Accepted24 May 2018
  • Published07 June 2018
  • Issue Date01 July 2019
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1907-9

Keywords

  • Tsunami
  • depth-averaged shallow water
  • Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes
  • benchmarking
  • NAMI DANCE
  • FLOW-3D®
원문 보기