Figure 2.4: Air entrapment and splashing in the sprue and sprue base areas at 2, 3 and 6% filled, using the conical pouring basin for a light-weight, stair-shaped Al-Si based casting, (Kotas et. al., 2010).

수율 향상과 품질 혁신: 시뮬레이션 기반 주조 공정 최적화로 고온 균열 및 편석 문제 해결

이 기술 요약은 Petr Kotas가 2011년 덴마크 기술대학교(Technical University of Denmark)에서 발표한 박사 학위 논문 “Integrated Modeling of Process, Structures and Performance in Cast Parts”를 기반으로 하며, STI C&D의 기술 전문가에 의해 분석 및 요약되었습니다.

키워드

Primary Keyword: 주조 공정 최적화
Secondary Keywords: 수치 모델링, 응고 해석, 기공 예측, 고온 균열, 매크로 편석, 니야마 기준(Niyama Criterion), 다중목표유전알고리즘(MOGA), 주조 방안 최적화

Executive Summary

도전 과제: 대형 주강품은 중심부 기공, 고온 균열, 매크로 편석과 같은 상호 연관된 결함으로 인해 높은 불량률과 비용 문제를 겪습니다.
해결 방법: 본 연구는 수치 시뮬레이션과 다중목표유전알고리즘(MOGA)을 결합하여 주조 방안(압탕, 냉금)을 최적화했으며, 특히 니야마 기준(Niyama Criterion)을 복잡한 결함 예측의 간접 지표로 활용했습니다.
핵심 성과: 니야마 기준을 통해 중심부 기공을 최적화함으로써, 계산 비용이 매우 높은 고온 균열 및 매크로 편석과 같은 복잡한 결함을 모든 최적화 단계에서 직접 시뮬레이션하지 않고도 동시에 효과적으로 감소시킬 수 있음을 입증했습니다.
핵심 결론: 시뮬레이션 기반의 응고 패턴 최적화는 주조 품질을 향상시키고 여러 유형의 결함을 한 번에 제어하며 생산 수율을 높이는 강력하고 실용적인 전략입니다.

도전 과제: 왜 이 연구가 CFD 전문가에게 중요한가?

대형 강철 주조 산업은 자동차, 항공우주 등 고부가가치 산업의 핵심 부품을 생산하지만, 제조 공정의 복잡성으로 인해 고질적인 품질 문제에 직면해 있습니다. 특히 응고 과정에서 발생하는 중심부 기공(centerline porosity), 고온 균열(hot tears), 매크로 편석(macrosegregation)은 제품의 기계적 성능을 저하시키고 최종적으로 폐기로 이어지는 주요 원인입니다.

이러한 결함들은 독립적으로 발생하기보다는 응고 과정의 열 구배, 냉각 속도, 응력 분포 등 복잡한 물리적 현상에 의해 서로 긴밀하게 연결되어 있습니다. 기존에는 경험에 의존한 시행착오 방식이나 개별 결함에 대한 단편적인 시뮬레이션으로 문제를 해결하려 했지만, 이는 막대한 시간과 비용을 초래했습니다. 더 큰 문제는 고온 균열이나 매크로 편석과 같은 결함을 직접적으로 모든 설계 변수에 대해 최적화하는 것은 현대의 컴퓨팅 기술로도 사실상 불가능에 가깝다는 점입니다. 이러한 기술적 한계는 가상 프로토타이핑의 잠재력을 완전히 활용하지 못하게 만드는 걸림돌이었습니다. 따라서, 계산 효율적이면서도 여러 결함을 동시에 제어할 수 있는 통합적인 주조 공정 최적화 방법론의 필요성이 절실했습니다.

접근 방식: 연구 방법론 분석

본 연구는 이러한 산업적 난제를 해결하기 위해 상용 주조 시뮬레이션 소프트웨어(MAGMAsoft®)와 최적화 모듈(MAGMAfrontier)을 결합한 혁신적인 접근법을 채택했습니다.

연구의 핵심은 다중목표유전알고리즘(Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm, MOGA)을 사용하여 주조 방안의 핵심 설계 변수(압탕의 형상 및 크기, 냉금의 배치 및 치수 등)를 최적화하는 것입니다. 가장 주목할 만한 점은 최적화의 목표 함수 설정 방식입니다. 계산 비용이 많이 드는 고온 균열이나 매크로 편석을 직접 목표 함수로 설정하는 대신, 이들과 물리적으로 깊은 연관성을 가지면서도 계산이 훨씬 용이한 ‘니야마 기준(Niyama Criterion)’을 활용했습니다.

니야마 기준은 열 구배(G)를 냉각 속도(√R)의 제곱근으로 나눈 값으로, 주로 중심부 기공 예측에 사용되는 지표입니다. 연구진은 이 기준값이 응고 패턴의 건전성을 나타내는 핵심 지표이며, 이를 최적화하면 기공뿐만 아니라 고온 균열 및 매크로 편석을 유발하는 근본적인 열적 조건을 제어할 수 있다는 가설을 세웠습니다. 이 접근법을 통해 수천 개의 설계 대안을 자동으로 평가하고, 상충하는 목표(예: 압탕 부피 최소화 vs. 기공 최소화) 사이에서 최적의 균형점을 찾는 파레토 최적해(Pareto-optimal front)를 도출할 수 있었습니다.

Figure 2.2: Schematic of a traditional gating system layout. Figure taken from11

핵심 성과: 주요 발견 및 데이터

성과 1: 니야마 기준을 통한 통합 결함 제어 가능성 입증

본 연구는 중심부 기공, 고온 균열, 매크로 편석이 모두 응고 마지막 단계의 ‘열적 조건’이라는 공통된 뿌리를 가지고 있음을 명확히 했습니다.

낮은 니야마 값 (완만한 열 구배): 넓은 고상-액상 공존 구간(mushy zone)을 형성하여 용탕 유동의 저항을 높이고, 이는 최종 응고부의 용탕 부족으로 이어져 중심부 기공을 유발합니다. 또한, 넓은 고상-액상 공존 구간은 대류 현상을 촉진하여 매크로 편석의 원인이 됩니다.
국부적으로 매우 높은 니야마 값 (급격한 열 구배): 특정 부위에 급격한 온도 변화를 일으켜 높은 열 변형률(thermal strain)을 유발하며, 이는 응고가 완료되지 않은 취약한 지점에서 고온 균열을 발생시키는 주요 요인이 됩니다.

결론적으로, 니야마 기준을 적절한 범위 내에서 최적화하여 점진적이고 방향성이 제어된 응고 패턴을 구현하면, 세 가지 주요 결함을 동시에 억제할 수 있다는 물리적 연관성을 입증했습니다. 이는 복잡한 결함 문제를 더 단순하고 계산 효율적인 지표로 관리할 수 있는 새로운 길을 제시합니다.

성과 2: MOGA 기반 최적화로 다중 결함 감소 및 수율 향상 동시 달성

연구에 포함된 단조 램(Forging Ram) 주조 사례는 제안된 방법론의 실질적인 효과를 명확하게 보여줍니다. 최적화의 목표는 ‘압탕 부피 최소화(수율 향상)’와 ‘주강품 내 기공 최소화(품질 향상)’라는 상충하는 두 가지였습니다.

초기 설계: 초기 설계안(그림 3.10)에서는 부적절한 냉각으로 인해 주강품 하부에 광범위한 기공이 예측 및 실제로 발생했습니다.
최적화 설계: MOGA를 이용한 최적화를 통해 압탕의 크기와 냉금의 설계를 변경했습니다. 그 결과, 파레토 최적해(그림 4.10)에서 다양한 대안들이 도출되었습니다.
결과: 최종적으로 선택된 최적안(그림 4.11의 Solution 2)은 주강품 내부의 기공을 거의 완벽하게 제거했을 뿐만 아니라(그림 4.13), 매크로 편석 문제까지 크게 개선했습니다. 더 놀라운 점은, 이러한 품질 향상과 동시에 주조 수율을 기존 55.36%에서 72.01%로 대폭 향상시켰다는 것입니다(표 V). 이는 주조 공정 최적화가 품질과 원가 경쟁력을 동시에 확보할 수 있는 핵심 전략임을 데이터로 증명한 것입니다.

R&D 및 운영을 위한 실질적인 시사점

공정 엔지니어: 본 연구는 니야마 기준 시뮬레이션을 통해 압탕 및 냉금의 배치와 크기를 최적화하는 것이 점진적, 방향성 응고를 달성하는 핵심임을 시사합니다. 이는 기공, 고온 균열, 편석을 동시에 완화할 수 있는 구체적인 공정 가이드를 제공합니다.
품질 관리팀: 논문의 그림 3.21 및 3.29 등에서 볼 수 있듯이, 특정 니야마 값과 결함 발생 유형 간의 상관관계는 주조 전 고위험 부위를 예측하는 새로운 기준을 제시합니다. 이는 비파괴 검사(NDT)의 집중 영역을 설정하고 품질 검사 효율을 높이는 데 활용될 수 있습니다.
설계 엔지니어: 이번 연구 결과는 주조 방안 설계가 단순히 용탕을 채우는 것을 넘어, 최종 제품의 품질을 결정하는 핵심 요소임을 보여줍니다. MOGA와 니야마 해석을 초기 설계 단계에 도입하면, 후공정에서 문제를 해결하려 하기보다 설계 단계에서부터 결함을 원천적으로 제거하는 ‘가상 프로토타이핑’의 가치를 극대화할 수 있습니다.

논문 정보

Integrated Modeling of Process, Structures and Performance in Cast Parts

1. 개요:

제목: Integrated Modeling of Process, Structures and Performance in Cast Parts
저자: Petr Kotas
발행 연도: 2011
발행 학술지/기관: Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Mechanical Engineering
키워드: Integrated modeling, casting process, numerical optimization, casting defects, hot tears, macrosegregation, centerline porosity, steel castings, Niyama criterion, genetic algorithms

2. 초록:

이 논문은 대형 주강품 생산을 위한 중력 사형 주조 공정의 수치 시뮬레이션을 다룹니다. 전체 제조 공정은 금형 충전, 응고, 고상 냉각 및 후속 응력 발생을 고려하여 수치적으로 모델링되고 평가됩니다. 열 해석은 건전하고 경쟁력 있는 주조품을 생산하기 위한 최적의 열적 측면과 조건을 찾기 위해 진화적 다중 목표 최적화 기법과 결합됩니다. 최적화 절차의 목표는 주조 및 방안 설계와 결함 발생에 관련됩니다. 즉, 모든 잠재적 주조 결함을 제거하는 동시에 주조 수율을 최대화하는 것이 목표입니다. 수치 최적화 알고리즘은 이러한 목표를 취하고, 칠 설계, 라이저 설계, 탕구계 설계 등 조사된 공정, 설계 또는 재료 매개변수 집합을 검색하여 이러한 목표를 가장 잘 만족시키는 것을 찾습니다.

3. 서론:

주조 산업은 높은 품질, 문서화, 납기일에 대한 계속 증가하는 요구를 충족해야 합니다. 이를 위해 기존의 경험 기반 혁신이나 시행착오 방식에서 벗어나, 수치 주조 공정 시뮬레이션(가상 프로토타이핑)을 도입하는 것이 중요해졌습니다. 이 기술은 실제 금형 제작 전에 공정을 최적화하여 비용과 시간을 절약할 수 있게 합니다. 본 연구의 목적은 금속 주조 공정에서 열 조건을 조사, 제어 및 최적화하기 위해 수치 모델을 적용하는 것입니다. 용융 금속의 유동과 후속 열 흐름이 미세구조 진화, 결함 발생, 주조품의 건전성, 기계적 특성 및 잔류 응력에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 수치 시뮬레이션과 최적화 기법을 통해 조사합니다. 특히 대형 주강품의 중력 사형 주조에 초점을 맞춥니다.

4. 연구 요약:

연구 주제의 배경:

대형 주강품의 품질은 응고 과정에서 발생하는 열적 현상에 크게 좌우됩니다. 중심부 기공, 고온 균열, 매크로 편석과 같은 결함은 제품의 신뢰성을 저하시키는 주요 원인이지만, 이들 결함을 동시에 제어하는 것은 매우 어렵습니다. 특히, 고온 균열 및 매크로 편석에 대한 직접적인 수치 최적화는 막대한 계산 시간으로 인해 산업 현장에서 적용하기 어렵다는 한계가 있습니다.

이전 연구 현황:

과거 연구들은 개별 결함(예: Pellini의 기공 예측, Flemings의 편석 모델)에 초점을 맞추어 왔습니다. Niyama는 기존의 기공 예측 기준을 개선하여 열 구배와 냉각 속도를 모두 고려하는 기준을 제시했습니다. 하지만 이러한 결함들을 통합적으로, 그리고 계산 효율적으로 최적화하려는 시도는 부족했습니다. 특히, 계산 비용이 저렴한 지표를 활용하여 복잡한 결함을 간접적으로 제어하는 방법론에 대한 연구는 미미했습니다.

연구 목적:

본 연구는 대형 주강품의 주조 공정에서 발생하는 주요 결함들(중심부 기공, 고온 균열, 매크로 편석)을 통합적으로 제어하고 최소화하기 위한 효율적인 수치 최적화 방법론을 개발하고 검증하는 것을 목표로 합니다. 특히, 니야마 기준을 핵심 지표로 사용하여 응고 패턴을 최적화함으로써, 계산 비용이 많이 드는 결함들을 간접적으로 제어할 수 있는 가능성을 탐구합니다.

핵심 연구:

연구의 핵심은 다중목표유전알고리즘(MOGA)을 사용하여 압탕 및 냉금 설계를 최적화하는 것입니다. 최적화의 주요 목표는 (1) 압탕 부피 최소화를 통한 주조 수율 극대화와 (2) 니야마 기준을 이용한 중심부 기공 최소화입니다. 연구는 이 두 가지 상충하는 목표를 동시에 만족시키는 파레토 최적해를 도출합니다. 이후, 도출된 최적 설계안에 대해 상세한 열-유동 및 열-응력 해석을 수행하여, 중심부 기공 감소가 실제로 매크로 편석 및 고온 균열 발생 가능성을 효과적으로 억제하는지를 산업 사례를 통해 검증합니다.

5. 연구 방법론

연구 설계:

본 연구는 상용 주조 공정 해석 소프트웨어(MAGMAsoft)와 최적화 애드온 모듈(MAGMAfrontier)을 활용한 산업 사례 연구(Industrial case-study) 방식을 채택했습니다. 실제 산업 현장(Vitkovice Heavy Machinery)에서 문제가 되었던 대형 주강품(단조 램, 강철 링 등)을 대상으로 초기 설계안의 문제점을 분석하고, 수치 최적화를 통해 개선안을 도출한 후, 그 효과를 검증하는 절차로 진행되었습니다.

데이터 수집 및 분석 방법:

데이터 수집: 주조 공정의 모든 데이터(형상, 재료 물성, 공정 조건)는 산업 파트너로부터 제공받았습니다. 시뮬레이션을 통해 각 설계안에 대한 온도장, 유동장, 응력-변형률, 니야마 기준 값, 편석 분포 등의 데이터를 수집했습니다. 일부 사례에서는 실제 주조 시험품의 단면 분석 및 비파괴 검사(NDT) 결과를 수치 해석 결과와 비교 검증했습니다.
데이터 분석: 다중목표유전알고리즘(MOGA)을 사용하여 수천 개의 설계 변수 조합을 탐색하고, 목표 함수(압탕 부피, 니야마 값)에 대한 파레토 최적해 집합을 도출했습니다. 최종 선택된 설계안에 대해서는 상세한 충전, 응고, 대류-편석, 응력 해석을 수행하여 결함 발생 가능성을 종합적으로 평가했습니다.

연구 주제 및 범위:

주제: 수치 시뮬레이션과 다중목표유전알고리즘을 이용한 대형 주강품의 응고 패턴 최적화.
범위: 중력 사형 주조 공정에 국한됩니다. 주요 분석 대상 결함은 열적 구동력에 의해 발생하는 중심부 기공, 고온 균열, 매크로 편석(채널 편석 포함)입니다. 최적화의 주요 설계 변수는 압탕과 냉금의 형상, 크기 및 배치입니다.

6. 주요 결과:

주요 결과:

니야마 기준은 중심부 기공뿐만 아니라 고온 균열 및 매크로 편석 발생 가능성을 예측하는 효과적인 간접 지표로 활용될 수 있습니다.
다중목표유전알고리즘(MOGA)을 이용한 자동화된 최적화는 상충하는 목표(품질 향상 vs. 수율 증대) 사이에서 최적의 균형을 이루는 다양한 설계 대안(파레토 최적해)을 효율적으로 도출할 수 있습니다.
단조 램(Forging Ram) 사례 연구에서, 제안된 방법론을 통해 주강품의 기공 및 편석 결함을 성공적으로 제거하면서 동시에 주조 수율을 55.36%에서 최대 72.01%까지 향상시켰습니다.
쐐기형 주물(Wedge casting) 사례 연구에서, 응고 패턴 최적화를 통해 고온 균열의 근본 원인인 국부적인 열 변형률 집중을 해소하고 결함을 완전히 제거하는 데 성공했습니다.
계산 비용이 많이 드는 대류-편석 및 응력-변형률 해석을 모든 최적화 반복 단계에서 수행할 필요 없이, 니야마 기준 기반의 열 해석만으로도 다중 결함을 효과적으로 제어할 수 있는 실용적인 최적화 워크플로우를 제시했습니다.

Figure List:

Figure 1.1: Flow of steps involved in the solution of a technological problem.
Figure 2.7: Air aspiration identified in the down-sprue as the metal accelerates during its free- fall.
Figure 2.22: Effect of the runner extension on the flow velocity.
Figure 2.23: Non-tapered runner system contributing to the non-uniform entry of the metal into the casting cavity.
Figure 3.10: Negative effect of the solidification pattern on thermal gradients leading to porosity formation in the casting.
Figure 3.11: The effect of the intense cooling on the solidification pattern, on thermal gradients and on porosity elimination in the casting.
Figure 3.21: Prediction of the centerline macro/micro shrinkage and its experimental validation obtained from the foundry.
Figure 3.26: View on the location of a hot tear in the middle rib of a steel casting.
Figure 3.28: 3-D visualization of the original casting layout with its characteristic feeder design and chill patterns applied in the initial numerical calculations.
Figure 3.29: The Niyama criterion used to highlight areas with high thermal gradients for the casting shown in Figure 3.28.
Figure 3.31: Maximal principal strain rate contributing to hot tearing.
Figure 3.32: Hot tear prediction obtained from the numerical stress-strain analysis.
Figure 3.44: A detailed view on a concentration profile of carbon in the original casting layout.
Figure 3.47: The cast part used in Case Study I, and the initial casting layout.
Figure 4.10: Design space with all the calculated designs.
Figure 4.11: Three distinct designs proposed by the optimization tool.
Figure 4.13: Occurrence of centerline porosity in the optimized designs.
Figure 4.21: Carbon macrosegregation patterns for the two optimized solutions.
Figure 4.24: The objective space where all the computed designs are stored.
Figure 4.27: Temperature profiles at different stages of solidification in the optimized layout.
Figure 4.30: Hot tear prediction in the optimized casting layout.

7. 결론:

본 연구는 대형 주강품에서 발생하는 복잡하고 상호 연관된 결함들을 제어하기 위한 통합 모델링 및 최적화 방법론을 성공적으로 제시했습니다. 핵심적인 기여는 계산 비용이 저렴한 니야마 기준(Niyama criterion)을 활용하여, 계산적으로 매우 부담스러운 고온 균열 및 매크로 편석 문제를 간접적으로 최적화할 수 있음을 입증한 것입니다.

연구를 통해 중심부 기공, 고온 균열, 매크로 편석이 모두 응고 과정의 열 구배와 응고 패턴이라는 공통된 물리적 현상에 의해 지배된다는 사실을 확인했습니다. 다중목표유전알고리즘을 통해 점진적이고 방향성 있는 응고 패턴을 달성하도록 압탕과 냉금을 최적화한 결과, 중심부 기공이 제거되면서 동시에 다른 두 가지 주요 결함도 효과적으로 억제되었습니다. 산업 사례 연구들은 이 방법론이 단순히 이론에 그치지 않고, 실제 생산 현장에서 주조 수율을 획기적으로 향상시키고 제품의 건전성을 보장하는 실용적이고 강력한 도구임을 명확히 보여주었습니다.

8. 참고문헌:

Campbell, J., Castings. Second Edition. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, (2003).
Dantzig, J., Rappaz, M., Solidification, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, (2009).
Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., and Meyerivan, T., “A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, pp 182-197, (2002).
Flemings, M.C.: Solidification Processing. McGraw-Hill, Inc., (1974).
Fonseca, C., Fleming, P., “Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization”, 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, USA, (1993).
Goldberg, D.E., Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning, Addison Wesley Longmann, Inc., (1989).
Hattel, J.H., Fundamentals of Numerical Modelling of Casting Processes, 1st ed., Kgs. Lyngby: Polyteknisk Forlag, (2005).
Kokot, V., Bernbeck, P., “Integration and Application of Optimization Algorithms with Casting Process Simulation”, Proc. Int. Conf. On Modelling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, MCWASP X, Destin, Florida, pp. 487- 494, (May 2003).
Monroe, C., and Beckermann, C., “Development of a Hot Tear Indicator for Steel Castings,” Materials science and engineering A, Vol. 413-414, 2005, pp. 30-36.
Niyama, E., Uchida, T., Morikawa, M., Saito, S., “A method of shrinkage prediction and its application to steel casting practice,” AFS Int. Cast. Met. J., Vol. 7, No. 3, pp 52-63, (1982).
Pellini, W.S., “Factors which determine riser adequacy and feeding range,” AFS Transactions, Vol. 61, pp 61-80, (1953).
Schneider, M.C., Beckermann, C., “Formation of Macrosegregation by Multicomponent Thermosolutal Convection During the Solidification of Steel”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol. 26A, (1995).

전문가 Q&A: 주요 질문과 답변

Q1: 일반적으로 중심부 기공에 사용되는 니야마 기준을 기계적으로 다른 고온 균열 및 매크로 편석 최적화에 사용한 이유는 무엇입니까?

A1: 본 논문은 세 가지 결함 모두 근본적으로 응고 마지막 단계의 ‘열적 조건’에 의해 지배된다는 물리적 연관성에 주목했습니다. 니야마 기준은 열 구배(G)와 냉각 속도(R)의 함수로서, 응고 패턴의 건전성을 계산 효율적으로 정량화할 수 있는 지표입니다. 연구 결과, 니야마 값을 최적화하여 점진적이고 방향성 있는 응고 패턴을 구현하면, 고온 균열의 원인인 국부적 열 변형률과 매크로 편석의 원인인 넓은 고상-액상 공존 구간 및 제어되지 않는 대류 현상도 함께 완화되는 것으로 나타났습니다. 이는 복잡한 다중 결함 문제를 단일 지표로 효율적으로 관리할 수 있음을 의미합니다.

Q2: 매크로 편석을 직접 최적화하는 것이 계산 비용이 많이 든다고 하셨는데, 그 한계는 어느 정도이며, 니야마 기준을 통한 간접적인 접근법은 최종 편석 프로파일을 얼마나 잘 예측합니까?

A2: 단일 대류 및 편석 해석은 표준 워크스테이션에서 약 24시간이 소요될 수 있습니다. 일반적인 최적화 과정에는 1,000~2,000개의 설계안 평가가 포함되므로, 직접 최적화는 산업적으로 비현실적입니다. 반면, 단조 램 사례 연구(그림 4.21)에서 볼 수 있듯이 간접적인 접근법은 매우 효과적이었습니다. 니야마 값을 개선하기 위해 더 가파른 열 구배를 형성하자 고상-액상 공존 구간의 범위가 줄어들고 응고 방향성이 향상되어, 용질이 풍부한 잔류 용탕을 압탕으로 밀어내는 효과를 가져왔습니다. 결과적으로 최종 주강품의 성분 균일성이 크게 향상되어 유해한 편석이 최소화되었습니다.

Q3: 쐐기형 주물 사례 연구(Case Study 3)에서, 고온 균열의 원인이었던 샌드 코어의 기계적 구속 문제는 최적화를 통해 어떻게 구체적으로 해결되었습니까?

A3: 최적화 과정은 단순히 냉금의 설계만 변경한 것이 아니라, 고온 균열의 주요 원인이었던 상부 샌드 코어를 제거하는 설계 변경을 포함했습니다. 이와 함께 압탕과 냉금의 재설계를 통해 두 가지 효과를 동시에 얻었습니다. 첫째, 자유로운 열 수축을 방해하던 기계적 구속을 제거했습니다. 둘째, 더 균일한 온도 분포를 만들어(그림 4.27 참조) 균열의 직접적인 원인이었던 국부적인 열 변형률 집중을 해소했습니다.

Q4: 논문에서는 압탕 부피(수율)와 주물 건전성(기공) 사이의 상충 관계를 보여주는 파레토 최적해(그림 4.10)를 제시했습니다. 실제 현장에서 엔지니어는 이 중에서 ‘최상의’ 해결책을 어떻게 선택해야 합니까?

A4: 파레토 최적해는 수학적으로는 모두 동등하게 최적인 해들의 집합입니다. 최종 선택은 더 높은 수준의 실용적, 경험적 판단에 따라 달라집니다. 예를 들어, 고장이 허용되지 않는 핵심 부품의 경우, 수율이 다소 낮더라도 기공이 거의 없는 솔루션(예: Solution 2)을 선택할 것입니다. 반면, 덜 중요하거나 원가에 매우 민감한 부품의 경우, 허용 가능한 수준의 미세 기공을 감수하고 수율을 극대화하는 솔루션(예: Solution 3)을 선택할 수 있습니다. MOGA 접근법은 이처럼 다양한 선택지를 제공함으로써, 기업이 공학적, 경제적 상황을 종합적으로 고려하여 정보에 기반한 결정을 내릴 수 있게 합니다.

Q5: 고온 균열 예측의 대리 지표로 니야마 기준을 사용하는 것의 주된 한계점은 무엇입니까?

A5: 니야마 기준은 순수하게 열적인 지표입니다. 따라서 고온 균열을 유발하는 열 변형률 요소는 효과적으로 포착할 수 있지만, 코어나 복잡한 형상에 의한 기계적 구속 또는 재료 고유의 취성 온도 범위 같은 기계적, 재료적 특성을 직접적으로 설명하지는 못합니다. 본 연구도 이 점을 인지하고 있으며, 이것이 바로 니야마 기반 최적화로 도출된 최종 설계안에 대해 완전한 응력-변형률 해석을 수행하여 고온 균열이 실제로 발생하지 않음을 검증(그림 4.30 참조)한 이유입니다. 이는 니야마 기반 최적화 전략의 유효성을 최종적으로 확인하는 중요한 단계입니다.

결론: 더 높은 품질과 생산성을 향한 길

대형 주강품의 복잡하게 얽힌 결함 문제는 오랫동안 주조 산업의 난제였습니다. 본 연구는 니야마 기준과 다중목표유전알고리즘을 결합한 혁신적인 주조 공정 최적화 방법론을 통해 이 문제를 효율적으로 해결할 수 있는 실질적인 길을 제시했습니다. 응고 패턴이라는 근본적인 현상을 제어함으로써, 개별 결함에 대한 단편적인 대응을 넘어 품질과 수율이라는 두 마리 토끼를 동시에 잡을 수 있음을 입증했습니다.

STI C&D는 최신 산업 연구 결과를 적용하여 고객이 더 높은 생산성과 품질을 달성할 수 있도록 돕는 데 전념하고 있습니다. 이 논문에서 논의된 과제가 귀사의 운영 목표와 일치한다면, 저희 엔지니어링 팀에 연락하여 이러한 원칙을 귀사의 부품에 어떻게 구현할 수 있는지 논의해 보시기 바랍니다.

(주)에스티아이씨앤디에서는 고객이 수치해석을 직접 수행하고 싶지만 경험이 없거나, 시간이 없어서 용역을 통해 수치해석 결과를 얻고자 하는 경우 전문 엔지니어를 통해 CFD consulting services를 제공합니다. 귀하께서 당면하고 있는 연구프로젝트를 최소의 비용으로, 최적의 해결방안을 찾을 수 있도록 지원합니다.

연락처 : 02-2026-0450
이메일 : flow3d@stikorea.co.kr

저작권 정보

이 콘텐츠는 Petr Kotas의 논문 “Integrated Modeling of Process, Structures and Performance in Cast Parts”를 기반으로 한 요약 및 분석 자료입니다.
출처: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/integrated-modeling-of-process-structures-and-performance-in-ca

PDF View

Replication Casting and Additive Manufacturing for Fabrication of Cellular Aluminum with Periodic Topology: Optimization by CFD Simulation

주기적 토폴로지를 가진 셀룰러 알루미늄 제작을 위한 복제 주조 및 적층 제조: CFD 시뮬레이션을 통한 최적화

연구 목적

본 연구는 적층 제조(AM) 및 정밀 주조(Investment Casting)를 활용하여 셀룰러 알루미늄을 제작하는 방법을 제시함.
FLOW-3D® CFD 시뮬레이션을 통해 금속 폼(metal foam)의 충진 과정 및 형성 메커니즘을 최적화함.
주기적(open-cell) 구조를 가진 다공성 금속 제작의 적절한 공정 변수를 결정하여 품질을 개선하고자 함.
본 연구에서 개발된 공정이 충격 방지 장치, 진동 감쇠 장치 및 열 전달 향상 장치 등의 다기능 구조물 제작에 적용 가능함을 검증함.

연구 방법

프리폼(preform) 설계 및 제작
- ABS 및 왁스를 사용한 3D 프린팅을 활용하여 다공성 구조의 프리폼을 제작함.
- 정밀 주조 기법을 사용하여 A356 알루미늄 합금으로 프리폼을 금속화(replication casting)하여 최종 구조를 제작함.
- Rhino 및 FLOW-3D® 소프트웨어를 활용하여 설계 모델을 최적화함.
FLOW-3D® CFD 시뮬레이션 수행
- 용탕 충진(filling) 및 응고(solidification) 과정에서 온도 및 유동 패턴을 예측함.
- 충진 과정에서 발생할 수 있는 기공 형성(porosity) 및 미세 구조 불균일성을 평가함.
- 시뮬레이션 결과를 기반으로 주조 공정 변수(주조 온도, 주형 온도 등)를 조정하여 최적 조건을 도출함.
실험 검증 및 결과 분석
- 충진 실험을 통해 시뮬레이션 결과와 실제 주조물의 품질을 비교 분석함.
- 주조 후 X-ray 및 SEM(주사전자현미경) 분석을 통해 미세 구조 및 결함을 평가함.
- 최적화된 조건에서 제작된 시편을 기계적 특성 시험(충격 흡수, 강도 평가 등)하여 구조적 성능을 검토함.

주요 결과

주조 충진 거동 및 품질 평가
- FLOW-3D® 시뮬레이션 결과, 최적 충진 조건에서 금속 폼 구조의 85~100% 충진율을 확보함.
- 주조 온도와 주형 온도를 조정할 경우, 공기 갇힘(air entrapment) 및 기공 형성률이 감소함.
- 온도 분포가 균일할수록 다공성 구조의 기계적 강도가 향상됨.
다공성 구조 특성 및 기계적 성능 평가
- 주조된 알루미늄 폼의 미세 구조는 설계된 주기적 셀 구조와 일치함.
- 720°C의 주조 온도와 500°C의 주형 온도에서 가장 높은 품질을 달성함.
- 충격 저항 및 기계적 강도가 높은 특성을 보여, 진동 감쇠 및 충격 방지 소재로 활용 가능함.
시뮬레이션 및 실험 결과 비교 검증
- 실제 주조 결과와 CFD 시뮬레이션 예측 간 높은 상관관계 확인.
- 다공성 구조 제작 시 균일한 충진 및 결함 최소화를 위한 시뮬레이션 기반 설계 최적화가 효과적임.
- Rhino 및 FLOW-3D®를 결합한 설계-제조 프로세스가 고품질의 금속 폼 제작에 적합함.

결론

FLOW-3D® CFD 시뮬레이션을 활용하여 다공성 금속 폼 제작 공정을 최적화할 수 있음을 입증함.
720°C 주조 온도와 500°C 주형 온도에서 가장 높은 품질을 확보할 수 있음.
적층 제조와 정밀 주조를 결합한 공정이 다양한 산업 분야(충격 방지, 열 교환 등)에 활용 가능함을 확인함.
향후 연구에서는 다양한 재료 및 주조 변수에 따른 기계적 성능 최적화를 추가적으로 검토할 필요가 있음.

Reference

Ashby MF, Evans AG, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Making metal foams. Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, pp 6–23
Lázaro J, Solórzano E, Rodríguez-Pérez MA, Kennedy AR (2016) Efect of solidifcation rate on pore connectivity of aluminium foams and its consequences on mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 672:236– 246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.015
Banhart J, Manufacture, (2001) Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46:559–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5
Fernández P, Cruz LJ, Coleto J (2008) Manufacturing processes of cellular metals. Part I: Liquid route processes. Rev Metal 44:540–555. https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.0767
Fernández P, Cruz LJ, Coleto J (2009) Procesos de fabricación de metales celulares. Parte II: Vía sólida, deposición de metales, otros procesos. Rev Metal 45:124–142. https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.0806
Mirzaei-Solhi A, Khalil-Allaf J, Yusef M, Yazdani M, Mohammadzadeh A (2018) Fabrication of aluminum foams by using CaCO3 foaming agent. Mater Res Express 5:096526. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aad88a
Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN et al (2021) Nanoindentation measurement of core–skin interphase viscoelastic properties in a sandwich glass composite. Mech Time-Depend Mater 25:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-020-09448-y
Cao D et al (2021) The effect of resin uptake on the flexural properties of compression molded sandwich composites. Wind Energy. 2022; 25:71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2661
Wang X et al (2021) The interfacial shear strength of carbon nanotube sheet modified carbon fiber composites. In: Silberstein M, Amirkhizi A (eds) Challenges in mechanics of time dependent materials, Volume 2. Conference Proceedings of theSociety for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59542-5_4
García-Moreno F (2016) Commercial applications of metal foams: their properties and production. Materials 9:85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9020085
Atwater MA, Guevara LN, Darling KA, Tschopp MA (2018) Solid state porous metal production: a review of the capabilities, characteristics, and challenges. Adv Eng Mater 20:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700766
Gutiérrez-Vázquez JA, Oñoro J (2008) Espumas de aluminio. Fabricación, propiedades y aplicaciones. Rev Metal 44:457– 476. https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.0751
Matz AM, Mocker BS, Christian U, Jost N (2014) Microstructural evolution in investment casted open-pore aluminum-based alloy foams. Procedia Materials Science: 8th International Conference on Porous Metals and Metallic Foams, Metfoam 2013:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.551
Matz A, Mocker B, Muller D, Jost N, Eggeler G (2014) Mesostructural design and manufacturing of open-pore metal foams by investment casting. Adv Mater Sci Eng 421729. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/421729
Altug Guler K (2015) Solid mold investment casting –a replication process for open cell foam metal production. Materials Testing 57:795–798. https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110769
Sutygina A, Betke U, Hasemann G, Schefer M (2020) Manufacturing of open-cell metal foams by the sponge replication technique. Symposium on Materials and Joining Technology. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 882 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/882/1/012022
Cingi C, Niini E, Orkas J (2009) Foamed aluminum parts by investment casting. Colloids Surf, A 344:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.01.006
Li Y et al (2018) Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesium. Acta Biomater 67:378–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.008
Li Y et al (2019) Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous magnesium. Addit Manuf 28:299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.013
Feng X, Zhang Z, Cui X, Jin G, Zheng W, Liu H (2018) Additive manufactured closed-cell aluminum alloy foams via laser melting deposition process. Mater Lett 233:126–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.08.146
Legutko S (2018) Additive techniques of manufacturing functional products from metal materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 393:012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/393/1/012003
Chantarapanich N, Puttawibul P, Sucharitpwatskul S, Jeamwatthanachai P, Inglam S, Sitthiseripratip K (2012) Scafold library for tissue engineering: a geometric evaluation. Comput Math Methods Med 2012:407805. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/407805
Wenninger MJ (2015) Polyhedron models. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511569746
Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ (2016) 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 32:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018
Das S, Bourell DL, Babu SS (2016) Metallic Materials For 3D Printing. MRS Bull 41:729–741. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2016.217
Wei Ch, Li L, Zhang X, Chueh Y-H (2018) 3D printing of multiple metallic materials via modifed selective laser melting. CIRP Ann 67:245–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.096
Costanza G, Tata ME, Trillicoso G (2021) Al foams manufactured by PLA replication and sacrifice. Int J Lightweight Mater Manufac 4:62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.07.001
Pinto P, Peixinho N, Soares D, Silva F (2015) Process development for manufacturing of cellular structures with controlled geometry and properties. Mat Res 18:274–282. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-1439.286614
Cheah CM, Chua CK, Lee CW, Feng C, Totong K (2005) Rapid prototyping and tooling techniques: a review of applications for rapid investment casting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:308–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1840-6
Heiss T, Klotz UE, Tiberto D (2015) Platinum investment casting, part I: simulation and experimental study of the casting process. Johnson Matthey Technol Rev 59:95–108. https://doi.org/10.1595/205651315×687399
Grande MA, Porta L, Tiberto D (2007) Computer simulation of the investment casting process: widening of the filling step. The Santa Fe Symposium Jewelry Manufacturing Technology 1-18:53658215
Kader MA, Islam MA, Hazell PJ, Escobedo JP, Saadatfar M, Brown AD, Appleby-Thomas GJ (2016) Modelling and characterization of cell collapse in aluminium foams during dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng 96:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.020
Pulvirenti B, Celli M, Barletta A (2020) Flow and convection in metal foams: a survey and new CFD results. Fluids 5:155. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5030155
Diop M, Hao H, Dong H-W, Zhang X-G, Yao S, Jin J-Z (2011) Modelling of solidification process of aluminium foams using lattice Boltzmann method. Int J Cast Met Res 24:158–162. https://doi.org/10.1179/136404611X13001912813861
Hao H, Diop M, Yao S, Zhang X-G (2010) Numerical simulation of bubbles expansion and solidification of metal foams. Mater Sci Forum 654–656:1549–1552. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.1549
Barzegari M, Bayani H, Mirbagheri SMH, Shetabivash Ha (2019) Multiphase aluminum A356 foam formation process simulation using lattice Boltzmann method. J Market Res 8:1258–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.03.010
Barkhudarov MR, Hirt CW (1995) Casting simulation: mold filling and solidification-benchmark calculations using flow3D. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced SolidificationProcesses. https://www.flow3d.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Casting-Simulation-Mold-Filling-and-Solidification-Benchmark-Calculations-Using-FLOW-3D.pdf
Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen Q, Advincula RC (2018) Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 20:44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002
Matweb (1996) www.matweb.com
Staff FMT, & Foundry Management and Technology (2015) Why infrared heating stands apart for preheating sand molds. Retrieved August 2, 2017, from http://www.foundrymag.com/moldscores/hot-idea-mold-preheating-and-more.
Anglani A, Pacella M (2018) Logistic regression and response surface design for statistical modeling of investment casting process in metal foam production. Procedia CIRP 67:504–509
Giannitelli SM, Accoto D, Trombetta M, Rainer A (2014) Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 10:580–594
Dumas M, Terriault P, Brailovski V (2017) Modelling and characterization of a porosity graded lattice structure for additively manufactured biomaterials. Mater Des 121:383–392

Experimental and numerical investigation of the squeegee process during stencil printing of thick adhesive sealings

두꺼운 접착제 실링의 스텐실 인쇄 중 스퀴지 프로세스에 대한 실험적 및 수치적 조사

Fabiano I. Indicatti, Bo Cheng, Michael Rädler, Elisabeth Stammen, Klaus Dilger

ABSTRACT

To reliably compensate fuel cell stack tolerances, sealings with a layer thickness of at least 500 µm are necessary. Additionally, threads positioned at the upper region of the stencil apertures need to be integrated to print closed-loop designs under cycle times of as low as 3 seconds. All these requirements can intensify the occurrence of print defects and diminish the process stability. This paper addresses the issues of incomplete regions and air bubbles emerging during the squeegee process. It was detected that the cleanliness state of the stencil directly impacts the formation of incomplete regions by affecting venting conditions inside the aperture. Moreover, it was identified that bubbles are either transferred from the adhesive roll into the aperture or created due to interactions between the moving adhesive and stencil threads. Further, it was shown that bubbles cannot be completely eliminated using a stencil with threads but their size can remain smaller than 300 µm when printing with a new adhesive roll. Finally, distinct strategies were derived and verified experimentally to successfully print a basic sealing design. By introducing a small local gap between substrate and stencil, the entire sealing aperture was reliably filled without the need of a cleaning step.

1. Introduction

The structure of a single low temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (LT-PEMFC) fundamentally consists of a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) sandwiched between bipolar plates (BPPs) with sealings between these elements.^[Citation1] Up to hundreds of cells can be combined into a stack to provide the required power output, which demands highly reliable manufacturing processes since a single defective cell can compromise the entire stack safety and performance.^[Citation2] In light of this, the sealing is one specific component that has been receiving increased attention in the last years. Besides impeding gas and coolant leakages, the sealing is a crucial element in the overall stack concept for compensating assembly tolerances, which can reach up to 300 µm.^[Citation3]

To achieve projected market volumes, stencil printing was identified as an attractive technique to meet cycle time requirements for the sealing production, which should be as low as 3 seconds.^{[Citation4–6]} Despite that simple deposit structures achieving heights of up to 500 µm have been reported using solder pastes and conductive adhesives,^{[Citation7,Citation8]} stencil printing is typically not adopted to apply layer thicknesses higher than 200 µm. In comparison, fuel cell sealing concepts demand a minimum layer thickness of 500 µm to safely offset the mentioned stack tolerances under compression ratios of up to 40%.^{[Citation9–12]} Additionally, the sealings are characterized by significantly more complex contour designs to effectively seal ports, flow field and distribution channels of BPPs.

To print closed-loop designs, a so-called double-layer stencil can be adopted to apply the desired structure using a single print cycle.^{[Citation12–15]} As shown in Figure 1, it consists of an upper layer with patterned threads that link different regions of the stencil and provide sufficient mechanical stability. These threads also support the second lower layer, which delineates the print design. This same stencil concept was previously tested using distinct configurations for the threads to print sealings for fuel cells.^{[Citation5,Citation6]} These studies were mainly focused on investigating phenomena and print inconsistencies occurring during the separation process, such as the formation of air bubbles, filaments and excessive spreading. In contrast, print defects emerging during the squeegee process have not been thoroughly explored using this stencil concept.

Figure 1. Schematic of the stencil printing process consisting of a squeegee process (a) and a separation process (b). Perspective view of an aperture segment of a double-layer stencil made from stainless steel, based on.^{[Citation5,Citation6]}

In this paper, a basic sealing design was used to identify relevant printing problems during the squeegee process, as shown in Figure 2. It presents approximate dimensions of 60 mm x 60 mm that should resemble the sealing design in the ports region of typical fuel cells. The squeegee direction corresponds to the indicated x-direction and the three sealing lines perpendicular to the squeegee direction were marked with the letters A, B and C for the sake of better differentiation. With this design, potential printing difficulties closer to the real application can be identified and evaluated more effectively. Based on preliminary experiments, two main print defects during the squeegee process were identified: incomplete regions and bubble formation.

Figure 2. Representative specimen of the basic sealing design with highlighted print defects (printed at 160 mm/s using condition SS–R1). The used squeegee direction corresponds to the indicated positive x-direction.

Incomplete regions are a known issue in stencil printing.^{[Citation16–20]} Typically, small aperture dimensions and an insufficient pressure inside the print material are the main reported reasons for the emergence of this defect. In contrast, the formation of bubbles during the squeegee process is a less recognized phenomenon in stencil printing but can considerably impact the process reproducibility. In the field of screen printing, the presence of bubbles inside specimens was already reported by several studies.^{[Citation20–27]} The mechanical agitation of the print material before the squeegee process and inherent interactions with the mesh were indicated as driving mechanisms for bubbles to appear.^{[Citation24–28]} Yet, there is still very little consensus and a general lack of correlation with experimental data on describing how these bubbles are produced. Several computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were developed to estimate the pressure distribution within the print material in front of the moving squeegee^{[Citation29–32]} and the filling completeness of a given aperture volume,^{[Citation17,Citation18,Citation33,Citation34]} where the latter has the additional advantage of being experimentally measurable. However, more comprehensive simulative approaches demonstrating the print material motion are still missing in the literature, which could provide valuable information to optimize the aperture filling behaviour and avoid print defects.

Based on this scenario, comprehensive print experiments were conducted to determine how print and stencil parameters influence the formation of incomplete regions and bubbles during the squeegee process. Characterisation methods using microscope images and micro-CT scans were applied to quantify and analyse these defects. Here, a stencil containing a lines design with and without threads was adopted, which allows to isolate the impact of threads in the print results. In addition, a new CFD model of the squeegee process was developed in FLOW–3D^[Citation35] to visualize how these print defects emerge. The squeegee process was recorded in slow motion to analyse the adhesive roll behaviour and provide additional validation for the simulations. Based upon the combined experimental and simulation results, potential approaches to avoid these printing problems using the basic sealing design were derived and tested. Ultimately, the collected findings in this paper should enhance the understanding on decisive process and stencil parameters during the squeegee step, increasing the attractiveness of this technique for the application of sealings and adhesives in the industry.

2. Materials and methods

All preparation steps and experiments were conducted in laboratory conditions, at 23°C.

2.1. Stencil design

Two different stencils made from stainless steel (Christian Koenen GmbH, Ottobrunn, Germany) were used for the experiments. As illustrated in Figure 3, both stencils presented apertures with a 680 µm thick step and 120 µm thick threads, resulting in a stencil thickness of 800 µm. Here, a thicker stencil than the minimum layer thickness of 500 µm is required since a certain degree of spreading (height loss) of the applied material over the substrate always occurs. A very similar configuration was previously used to reliably reach the same layer thickness using several distinct adhesives as print material.^[Citation6] The first stencil (a) corresponds to the one used to print the mentioned sealing design, and the second stencil (b) consists of 80 mm length lines with two different widths: 1.52 and 2.34 mm, which correspond to aperture aspect ratios (AR = width/height) of 1.90 and 2.93, respectively. A second pair of lines without threads was included in this stencil to separately examine how the addition of threads influences the print results. The line orientation relative to the squeegee direction was primarily adjusted at 0°. This considerably reduces the modelling and computational effort for the numerical simulations but still allows to capture the basic formation mechanisms of desired print defects.

**Figure 3. Schematic of used stencils and detailed views of the aperture threads design.**

2.2. Adhesive selection and print parameters

An ultraviolet (UV) curable acrylic was selected for all experiments, and it corresponds to adhesive B3, which was thoroughly characterized and tested previously by Indicatti et al.^[Citation6] It exhibited very good printability, and its transparency facilitates the characterisation of bubbles inside the specimen. Moreover, this adhesive presented a reduced filament-stretching tendency, which avoided the formation of bubbles during the separation process.

The rheological properties of this adhesive required for the simulation model are reported in Table 1. The viscosity values were obtained with a stepped flow approach using a rheometer (MCR 500, Anton-Paar GmbH, Ostfildern, Germany) equipped with a plate-plate setup (25 mm diameter) and a 0.4 mm gap. The adhesive surface tension was measured with the Wilhelmy plate method (K100 Force Tensiometer, KRÜSS GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) using a platin-iridium Wilhelmy-plate (10 × 20 x 0.2 mm). These measurements were carried out at a constant speed of 0.01 mm/s and an immersion depth of 2 mm. An optical contact angle measurement system (DSA 10, KRÜSS GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used to determine the adhesive equilibrium contact angle with the stencil surface. The surface tension and contact angle measurements were conducted with adhesive B3 without fumed silica since the filled one used for the print experiments exhibited an apparent yield stress that prevented wetting and thereby reliable measurements with these methods. For additional information about this adhesive and rheological characterisations, see reference.^[Citation6]

Equilibrium surface tension [mN/m]	28.6 ± 0.1
Equilibrium contact angle of the adhesive on the stencil surface (smooth untreated stainless steel) [°]	20.0 ± 1.5
Density [g/cm³]	0.970
Shear rate [1/s]	Steady-state viscosity [Pa∙s]
10	21.1
15.6	15.4
25.1	11.5
39.8	8.9
63.1	7.1
100	5.8

Table 1. Average and corresponding standard deviation of the adhesive properties incorporated into the model. The contact angle and surface tension measurements were repeated five times. The viscosity standard deviation remained below 5%, based upon three measurements.

The print experiments were performed with a commercial stencil printer (EKRA STS E5, ASYS Group, Dornstadt, Germany). Squeegee speeds of 40 and 160 mm/s were tested, and the separation speed kept unchanged at 1 mm/s to minimize the risk of print defects emerging during separation. A squeegee pressure of 0.5 N/mm was adopted to leave the stencil topside completely free of adhesive remains after the squeegee process, which is a required condition to not affect the final layer thickness. The used squeegee (RKS Carbon S HQ/30 65 Shore, RK Siebdrucktechnik GmbH, Rösrath, Germany) presented a length of 120 mm and a 4 mm chamfer (45°) at the tip. A squeegee holder of 60° was adopted, resulting in a nominal squeegee angle of 15°. This squeegee configuration was selected based on previous experiments to enhance the aperture filling and process reproducibility.

An adhesive roll was manually dispensed over the stencil using an adhesive gun to ensure comparable initial conditions. Every new adhesive roll was completely free of bubbles and its height was always between 8 and 12 mm. Large adhesive residues on the squeegee after printing were also removed when a new roll was added to prevent any further sources of bubbles. Another additional parameter evaluated was the aperture state and cleanliness of the stencil underside before printing. Considering the adhesive roll state, four different print conditions were investigated, as illustrated in Figure 4
: cleaned aperture with cleaned stencil and a new adhesive roll (CA–R1), pre-wetted aperture with cleaned stencil and a new adhesive roll (CS–R1), pre-wetted aperture with smeared stencil and a new adhesive roll (SS–R1), and pre-wetted aperture with smeared stencil and a three-times used adhesive roll (SS–R3).

**Figure 4. Simplified illustration of the aperture cross section describing the four tested print conditions considering the state of the aperture, stencil underside and adhesive roll.**

With exception of condition CA–R1, these correspond to relevant operation modes that have direct impact on the production cycle time and process efficiency. The cleaning procedure of the stencil was conducted manually by hand using absorbent wipes. It is important to emphasize that the illustrated smearings in Figure 4 were not considered as a print defect since these remained roughly smaller than 0.2 mm throughout the performed experiments. Moreover, the extent of smearings observed did not cause instabilities during the separation process, nor did it significantly affect print resolution due to the relatively large dimensions of the printed structures.

2.3. Specimens characterisation

All specimens were scanned using a light microscope (VHX-2000, Keyence, Osaka, Japan) with a resolution of 5.2 µm/pixel. To analyse the bubbles inside the specimens, ImageJ^{[Citation36,Citation37]} was used for image processing and extracting the quantity and area of bubbles, as depicted in Figure 5
. Since the majority of the bubbles exhibited a circular shape, the measured bubble area was converted to an equivalent bubble diameter, which is a more convenient indicator. Frequency distribution histograms of the bubble diameter were derived from this data by combining the quantity of bubbles of three different specimens printed at identical conditions. Furthermore, micro-CT measurements (voxel-size: 10 µm) were conducted with a few representative specimens to obtain the precise position of the bubbles along the specimen height, which could not be assessed using the microscope.

Figure 5. Developed approach using ImageJ to characterize bubbles formed during the squeegee process.

3. Experimental results and discussion

3.1. Incomplete regions

The gap between stencil and substrate was measured and set to zero in order to keep the smearings at a minimum. Prominent smearings were not observed during all experiments. However, it was identified that the cleanliness state of the stencil before printing was associated with the emergence of incomplete regions, as reported in Figure 6. When the stencil was not cleaned before printing (conditions SS–R1 and SS–R3), 95.8% of the specimens exhibited incomplete regions. In contrast, only 6.3% of the specimens printed with a cleaned stencil (conditions CA–R1 and CS–R1) presented this defect. The incomplete regions were located exclusively at the line extremity that was last filled by the squeegee and appeared either as a large bubble that extends almost throughout the entire line width (Figure 7(a)) or as an empty space (Figure 7(b)).

**Figure 6. Number of specimens exhibiting incomplete regions printed at 40 and 160 mm/s.**

**Figure 7. Representative specimens with incomplete regions at the line extremity (last part to be filled by the squeegee).**

The occurrence of this defect was attributed to the lack of air venting at the line extremity due to the smearings at the stencil underside. Despite being small, the smearings can act like an additional seal between the stencil and substrate that impedes air to be expelled from the aperture during the squeegee process. This deduction is supported by the fact that large air bubbles were transferred into the adhesive roll when printing with a smeared stencil whereas such bubbles were not observed when it was cleaned. Figure 8 displays this phenomenon with two image sequences from the squeegee process recorded at a frame rate of 120 fps using a cleaned (a) and a smeared stencil (b). As can be seen, both adhesive rolls are completely free of bubbles before reaching the line extremity. The gap between stencil and substrate is intended to be zero, however, it still allows air to escape when the stencil is cleaned, which most of the time is sufficient to avoid filling defects and the formation of bubbles inside the adhesive roll. This phenomenon was identified using all four print conditions and was consistently replicated using both squeegee speeds.

Figure 8. Image sequences of the squeegee process using a cleaned (a) and smeared stencil (b) to compare the formation of bubbles inside the adhesive roll when the squeegee (40 mm/s) passes through the line extremity.

The same effect was observed when printing the sealing design, where large bubbles formed inside the adhesive roll when it was passing by the T-intersections and the line C of the sealing. Here, the detection of these bubbles was correlated with the presence of incomplete regions as well. The T-intersections can be considered as a more critical part to be completely filled due to their geometry and larger volume compared to the lines. Thus, the aperture design and its orientation relative to the squeegee direction can be considered as an additional influencing parameter, which directly determine the available time for filling. For instance, a few small incomplete regions were also formed at lines A and B, as shown in Figure 2. In this case, large bubbles did not appear inside the adhesive roll when passing through these lines, and the formation of these incomplete regions can be further associated with an insufficient time for the adhesive to fill the aperture or air to be expelled from it. This is reinforced by the observation that lines A and B of sealing specimens printed at 40 mm/s exhibited a better or even complete filling of those lines. Therefore, additional approaches to provide sufficient venting and time for filling are required to reliably fill all critical regions, which will be discussed later in section 5.

Variations of the squeegee speed and aperture AR or the presence of stencil threads did not notably impact the formation of incomplete regions, see Figure 6. All specimens were printed with a nominal squeegee angle of 15°, and experiments performed with larger (30°) and shallower (5°) angles did not result in any significant improvement of the aperture filling completeness. Increasing the vertical squeegee pressure to minimize the extent of smearings at the stencil underside also did not avoid incomplete regions. Indeed, an excessive squeegee pressure (>1 N/mm) might even enhance the restriction on air flow between stencil and substrate, leading to the emergence of incomplete regions using a cleaned stencil as well. This description better indicates the ‘cleanliness state’ as the decisive parameter on the formation of the print defect.

3.2. Bubble formation

Figure 9 reports frequency distribution histograms of the bubble diameter from specimens printed at two different squeegee speeds and aperture ARs. The measured quantity of bubbles was normalized by the total considered length of three specimens (240 mm) to enhance comparability. The histograms of specimens printed without threads were included as well. Yet, the following explanations are only considered for the specimens printed with threads if not indicated.

**Figure 9. Frequency histograms of the diameter of the bubbles produced during the squeegee process.**

Overall, the diameter of the bubbles did not surpass 1000 µm and the majority of them remained below 300 µm. By increasing the squeegee speed from 40 to 160 mm/s, the quantity of bubbles more than doubled in average considering the four tested print conditions. When the aperture AR is increased from 1.90 to 2.93, the average quantity of bubbles increased about 44%. In all considered cases, the cleaned aperture (CA–R1) produced the smallest quantity of bubbles. The bubble formation drastically increased with a pre-wetted aperture, as represented by the profiles of the cleaned (CS–R1) and smeared stencil (SS–R1). Here, the quantity of bubbles stayed relatively constant independent of the cleanliness state of the stencil (CS–R1 or SS–R1), and the distribution of the bubble diameter maintained a similar range as well. In this case, the largest discrepancy was notable in bubbles of up to 50 µm in diameter. Specimens printed with a smeared stencil (SS–R1) presented about twice the quantity of bubbles of this size when compared to those printed with the cleaned stencil (CS–R1). When printing with the same adhesive roll for the third time (SS–R3), the quantity of bubbles kept in about the same level of specimens printed with a new adhesive roll (SS–R1). One exception here was observed using the larger aperture AR at 160 mm/s, which produced approximately 50% more bubbles with the three times used adhesive roll. In addition, SS–R3 specimens were the only ones that exhibited very large bubbles with more than 300 µm in diameter.

By combining the results from the diagrams with the recordings of the squeegee process and specimens characteristics, three main mechanisms for bubble formation were identified, as shown in Figure 10. The first mechanism corresponds to bubbles that are not created due to the stencil threads but transferred from the adhesive roll into the aperture during the squeegee process. These bubbles are in general smaller than 300 µm and they hardly interact with stencil threads due to their size. This was confirmed by the fact that lines printed with the aperture without threads still presented bubbles but in considerable smaller quantities. In this case, lines printed with a new adhesive roll did not exhibit a significant quantity of bubbles independent of the squeegee speed. However, if a new adhesive roll was not added, the quantity of bubbles increased with the number of print cycles. Figure 11 presents an adhesive roll free of air bubbles before the squeegee process (a) and the same adhesive roll after three print cycles (b). The visible bubbles in the roll correspond to the ones that can be transferred into the aperture during the squeegee process. These bubbles might be created by random local instabilities during filling, but the main sources appear to be the air entrapment due to the lack of venting at the aperture extremity, as mentioned earlier, and due to the first contact or recontact between the squeegee and the adhesive over the stencil.

**Figure 10. Identified bubble formation mechanisms during the squeegee process. The shown specimen segments were printed with an aperture AR of 2.93.**

Figure 11. Adhesive roll over the stencil free of air bubbles before printing (a) and after three print cycles (b). In this case, the aperture with threads was used but very similar bubble characteristics inside the adhesive roll were observed when printing with the aperture without threads.

The second mechanism is very similar to the first one, with the difference that the stencil threads interact with large bubbles from the adhesive roll (shown in Figure 11(b)) when these are entering the aperture. This was deduced considering the regular position of large bubbles coinciding with the threads pitch and by comparing specimens printed with and without threads. This mechanism was responsible for producing the largest bubbles identified (>300 µm), which solely emerged inside specimens printed with threads. Thus, it is plausible to say that the interactions with the threads might increase the final air volume of bubbles coming from the adhesive roll since the characteristics of bubbles produced inside the adhesive roll were very similar independent of the threads presence. Alternatively, the threads might also locally change flow conditions, which could facilitate the transfer of larger bubbles from the adhesive roll.

Finally, the third mechanism is exclusively related to the presence of stencil threads, as these bubbles presented a very uniform pattern correlated with the threads pitch. Here, bubbles having a broad size range between 50 and 300 µm appearing near the centreline were the main type responsible for increasing the quantity of bubbles when a higher squeegee speed was used. Moreover, bubbles typically smaller than 100 µm in diameter emerged very close to the aperture walls and mostly in pairs. These are the primary contributors to the increase of the bubbles quantity when printing with a pre-wetted aperture (CS–R1 and SS–R1) instead with a cleaned aperture (CA–R1). The formation mechanisms of these two types of bubbles could not be captured experimentally but were assessed by the numerical simulations.

During the experiments it was also observed that bubbles can disappear after the separation process, as shown in Figure 12. Bubbles close to the aperture walls and threads might stay in the aperture or break due to the separation process since filaments are stretched near these regions. However, this phenomenon happened only occasionally and has a considerable smaller impact than the mechanisms previously presented. Yet, this phenomenon should be still mentioned since these bubbles might remain inside the aperture after separation and reappear in the following printed specimen. Thus, considering this and the three bubble formation mechanisms shown in Figure 10, it can be stated that all bubbles inside specimens printed with condition CA–R1 emerge due to the presence of stencil threads (Mechanism 3). Specimens produced with conditions CS–R1 and SS–R1 present bubbles that are majorly originated from Mechanism 3 since a new adhesive roll is used for these two conditions as well. Finally, specimens printed with condition SS–R3 exhibit bubbles from all mechanisms described before. It is possible to infer that all bubbles larger than 300 µm emerge due to Mechanism 2. However, excepting the small bubbles (<100 µm) close to the lateral walls exhibiting a uniform relative distance (Mechanism 3), the remaining bubbles cannot be categorized into their corresponding formation mechanism with certainty.

Figure 12. Comparison of the aperture before the separation process (left) and the final specimen (right) demonstrating how bubbles can disappear when located near the aperture walls and threads. This specimen was printed using condition SS–R1.

4. Modelling approach

This numerical study is focused on reproducing the basic formation mechanisms of incomplete regions and bubbles during the squeegee process. The simulations were performed only at a constant squeegee speed of 40 mm/s since it was already sufficient for both print defects to emerge. As previously discussed, a higher squeegee speed solely increased the quantity of bubbles but did not drastically change other characteristics of these print defects. For validation, the position and relative size of these defects were assessed alongside real specimens using microscope images and micro-CT scans. In addition, recordings of the adhesive motion during the squeegee process were compared with the simulation results to identify possible similarities. The CFD model was implemented in the commercially available software FLOW–3D,^[Citation35] which applies the finite volume method (FVM) to numerically solve the conservation equations for mass and momentum. By neglecting turbulence effects and mass generation, these two equations can be described by the following expressions, respectively:

∂𝜌∂t+∇⋅(𝜌⁢𝒖)=0 (1)

∂𝒖∂𝑡+(𝒖⋅∇)⁢𝒖=1𝜌∇𝑝+𝜈∇2𝒖+𝒇 (2)

where 𝜌 is the adhesive density, 𝑡 is the time, ∇ is the divergence, 𝒖 is the velocity vector, and 𝑝 is the static pressure. 𝜈 corresponds to the kinematic viscosity and 𝒇 to the external body forces, such as gravitational and surface tension forces. To describe the free interface between the two fluids (adhesive and air), the volume of fluid (VOF) method is used:

∂𝛼∂t+∇⋅(𝛼⁢𝒖)=0 (3)

The variable 𝛼 represents the proportion of the cell volume occupied by adhesive, with 𝛼=0 signifying a cell entirely filled with air and 𝛼=1 indicating a cell entirely filled with adhesive. Consequently, a partially filled cell is defined as 0<𝛼<1. At each step time, the interface between the fluids can be dynamically reconstructed based on this cell information and is iteratively recalculated considered the updated moving squeegee location. For further details about the model implementation, we refer here to the software’s user manual.^[Citation38]

4.1. Model description and assumptions

The same squeegee and threads dimensions from the experiments were incorporated into the model. To reduce computational effort, the aperture with 2.34 mm width (AR = 2.93) was modelled using an axisymmetric geometry, and only a line segment with 9.96 mm length was considered, as shown in Figure 13. A 3D model was adopted since a 2D model is not able to capture the adhesive flow perpendicular to the squeegee direction, which is a decisive phenomenon inside the aperture during the filling process. In order to investigate the impact of venting on the formation of incomplete regions and bubbles, two different simulation cases were established. In the first case, a 50 µm gap between stencil and substrate was integrated to allow air to escape from the aperture during filling. This should be equivalent to condition CA–R1 tested experimentally. In the second case, the model did not include a gap and should correspond to condition SS–R1. Here, it is important to note that the simulation model did not contain pre-wetted aperture walls or threads, which has to be considered when comparing it with experimental results.

**Figure 13. Model overview with relevant dimensions and mesh details.**

The following assumptions have been further considered for the model:

The simulation domain contains only two phases (adhesive and air) with constant volumes, where the adhesive motion is simulated as an incompressible and laminar fluid flow.
The stencil and squeegee are modelled as rigid bodies and exhibit no-slip boundary conditions. A horizontal translational speed is given to the squeegee to simulate the filling process, and the stencil remains stationary. There is no gap between the squeegee tip and the stencil.
The shear thinning viscosity of the adhesive was defined in a tabular form between the shear rates of 10 and 100 s⁻¹, see Table 1.
The measured adhesive surface tension and its equilibrium contact angle with the stencil surface were included in the material model. The same equilibrium contact angle was adopted for the squeegee surface in the simulation.

The entire simulation domain was meshed with regular block shaped cells adopting a commonly used meshing strategy, where the cells exhibit reducing dimensions towards the aperture region and remain unchanged throughout the entire simulation time, as shown in Figure 12. To minimize repeated calculations, the squeegee process was modelled using a two-step approach. In the first step, the adhesive over the stencil rolls for about 25 mm up to near the aperture, reproducing the initial conditions from the experiments. The rolling motion of the adhesive reduces the viscosity due its shear thinning properties, which can impact the filling behaviour. This step was identical in both simulation cases, and the adhesive roll remained free of air bubbles. A coarser mesh with cell sides of up to 750 µm was applied for this step resulting in a simulation domain with about 1.8 million cells. In the second step, the adhesive starts entering the aperture, which corresponds to the simulation stage of main interest. Inside the aperture, the cells exhibited equal sides of 40 µm, which was adopted as a balance between computational time and accuracy. Using this mesh approach, the second domain contained about 3 million cells. The time step was automatically adjusted and ranged from 1 × 10³ to 1 × 10⁴ s during the first step while in the second one it stayed between 1 × 10⁻⁴ and 1 × 10⁻⁵ s.

4.2. Simulation results and validation

Figure 14 shows two simultaneous views from the symmetry plane and aperture bottom over the simulation time during the aperture filling with (a) and without (b) a gap between stencil and substrate. As can be seen, the adhesive is able to completely fill the aperture when a gap for venting is available. When the gap is removed, the right aperture extremity remains unfilled due to the enclosed volume formed between substrate, aperture walls and adhesive (t = 1.44 s). In this case, the formation of an air bubble inside the adhesive roll (t = 1.53 s) was captured by the simulation as well, agreeing with the experiment results presented in Figure 8(b). Another important phenomenon observed in the experiments and replicated by the model was the adhesive infiltrating the gap between the stencil and substrate, resulting in the formation of smearings that remained smaller than 0.15 mm in the simulation.

**Figure 14. Simultaneous views (∆t = 0.09 s) from the symmetry plane and aperture bottom of the simulated squeegee process with (a) and without (b) a gap between stencil and substrate.**

The simulations were also able to reproduce the formation of bubbles due to the presence of threads, as previously described by the third mechanism shown in Figure 10
. In the simulation case without a gap, bubbles with size ranging between 50 and 100 µm formed at the aperture walls and substrate surface with their relative distance coinciding with the threads pitch. When entering the aperture, the adhesive front is split by the threads into two smaller fronts that entrap air when reencountering at the substrate surface (t = 1.35 s). As the squeegee advances, the air is pushed towards the lateral walls but remains inside the aperture due to lack of venting. From micro-CT scans, it was possible to verify that these bubbles are touching the substrate surface as well, see Figure 15(b)
. Thus, these simulation results correlate very well with real specimens printed using condition SS–R1. Here is important to stress that the bubbles in the simulation are directly touching the aperture walls and would disappear in a subsequent separation process. In the real specimens, these bubbles are not contacting the aperture walls before separation, as shown in Figure 12
. This difference can be explained by the fact that the aperture in the simulation is not pre-wetted with adhesive before being filled, which differs from real SS–R1 conditions. Hence, the formation of these bubbles near the aperture walls results from the interplay between the incoming adhesive pushed by the squeegee and the adhesive that is pre-wetting the aperture walls. For comparison, these bubbles near the aperture walls did not appear when venting was available in the simulation, which also correlates with real specimens printed with CA–R1 conditions.

Figure 15. Qualitative comparison of representative specimens (scanned with microscope and micro-CT) and corresponding simulation exhibiting the final state of the aperture after the squeegee process with (a) and without (b) a venting gap. Bubbles produced due to the presence of threads (Mechanism 3) are visible in both experimental and simulation results, as indicated by the arrows. Two additional views (perspective and symmetry plane showing mesh cell size) of the two last threads (aperture extremity) from the simulated cases were included with the adhesive showing transparent properties to better visualize the generated bubbles.

Bubbles along the aperture centreline were formed in both simulation cases as well, see Figure 15. These bubbles are located close to or on the threads and exhibited sizes in the range of 100 to 200 µm, which fairly correlates with the experimental results. In the model, these bubbles only remained at the two last threads of the aperture. However, it is possible to observe bubbles forming around the other threads during filling (t = 1.44 s) but are broken after the squeegee tip passes through them (t = 1.62 s). In the experiments, these bubbles were visible all along the line length using conditions CA–R1 and SS–R1. Hence, the formation of these bubbles is unaffected by whether the threads are pre-wetted with adhesive or not. This discrepancy can be related to the apparent higher difficulty for the bubbles to detach from the threads in the model, which might be associated with insufficient small cell elements or simplifications in the material model.

To better understand this behaviour, Figure 16 presents the resulting adhesive velocity during the aperture filling for the case with a venting gap. The bubbles around the threads are formed approximately 4 to 6 mm in front of the squeegee tip (t = 1.46 s) and remain attached up until the squeegee tip reaches them (t = 1.55 s). The generated adhesive flow around the bubbles is not sufficient to release these from the threads. About 1 mm in front of the squeegee tip, a region with practically zero velocity is formed due to the flow direction change inside the aperture (t = 1.46 s). Immediately below the squeegee tip, the adhesive flow follows the squeegee direction but is gradually reorientated towards the substrate surface up until reaching the opposite direction of the squeegee. This reorientation leads to the formation of a backflow behind the squeegee tip, which causes a local overfilling of the aperture and contributes to break the bubbles around the threads (t = 1.55 s). When approaching the aperture extremity, the backflow region is affected by the aperture wall, which can explain why these bubbles only formed near the last two threads in the simulation.

Figure 16. Detailed symmetry plane view (∆t = 0.03 s) showing the resulting adhesive velocity for the simulation case with a venting gap between the stencil and substrate. The velocity vectors and fields are represented for a stationary observer fixed on the stencil.

This backflow was also observed experimentally but not in the same intensity as in the simulations. This difference can be related to the reduced viscosity range adopted and calibrated for the model, which used the viscosity value at 10 s⁻¹ for lower shear rates. In addition, the neglected thixotropic properties of the adhesive might also have an impact on this response. Simulations using a larger range for the shear thinning viscosity of up to 0.1 and 1 s⁻¹ were carried out but the higher viscosity avoided the reliable filling of the aperture, preventing any assessment of bubble formation during this step. Thus, the model is sensitive to changes in the viscosity range and should be recalibrated when, for instance, the squeegee speed is considerably increased. Additional simulation cases were not conducted since the formation of incomplete regions and bubbles was already detected and an appropriate investigation of the mentioned models deviations would go beyond the scope of this paper.

5. Sealing design with optimized print conditions

In this section, new strategies based on the presented experimental and numerical results were assessed to enhance the print conditions of the sealing design. Primary focus was placed on minimizing the process cycle time and on reducing print defects. The exhibited findings indicate that bubbles cannot be completely eliminated when using a stencil with threads. However, when using a new adhesive roll, the bubble diameter generally did not surpass 300 µm independent of the squeegee speed. Therefore, for every new specimen, a new adhesive roll was used. Despite producing more bubbles, the higher squeegee speed of 160 mm/s was favoured since these marginally impacted the process reliability. Yet, it should be emphasized that the influence of such bubbles on other sealing characteristics still needs to be quantified experimentally. For instance, previous studies have shown that voids inside composite and polymeric materials can notably diminish gas permeability, which on the other hand might be also compensated by increasing the sealing width or altering material properties.^{[Citation39–43]} Hence, systematic investigations should be conducted in the future to assess the real performance of sealings printed with stencil printing and determine how process parameters can be actively adjusted to control gas permeability.

It is possible to reduce the number of stencil threads and consequently the quantity of bubbles. However, the mechanical stability of the stencil must be re-evaluated when altering the threads design. In this case, the stencil was not changed but the orientation of the sealing design relative to the squeegee direction was rotated by 20°. This angle was selected based on previous experiments to shift the position of incomplete regions to the sealing edges highlighted in Figure 17. Yet, solely adjusting the sealing orientation was not sufficient to prevent all filling defects, which can be considered the major cause for print inconsistencies. For this reason, four different approaches were investigated to achieve a completely filled sealing, as reported in Table 2. Here, only approaches using the least amount of cleaning were considered since adding a cleaning step before printing every single specimen can substantially increase cycle time and production costs. Thus, all approaches were conducted using a pre-wetted aperture with a smeared stencil (SS–R1 condition), and three specimens were printed in sequence to confirm the observations. It is also important to note that, despite rotating the sealing design at 20° or adding a second squeegee stroke, the observed quantity and size of bubbles did not notably change compared to sealings printed at 0° with a single squeegee stroke. Thereby, further bubble characterisations were not conducted to analyse the influence of these parameters.

**Figure 17. Illustration of the rotated stencil with the sealing design and indication of regions exhibiting filling problems.**

Approach description	Snap-off distance [mm]	Formation of incomplete regions
(a) Single squeegee stroke with snap-off distance	0.2	Yes
(b) Double squeegee stroke	0	Yes
(c) Double squeegee stroke with snap-off distance	0.2	Yes
(d) Single squeegee stroke with local tape pieces (0.2 mm)	0.2	No

Table 2. Overview of evaluated approaches to eliminate incomplete regions in the sealing design.

The first approach was based on introducing a gap of 0.2 mm between stencil and substrate, also sometimes referred as snap-off distance.^{[Citation44,Citation45]} It was expected that this gap could provide sufficient venting to fill the aperture entirely. However, no significant improvement in avoiding incomplete regions was observed compared to sealings printed without a gap, see Figure 18(a)
. Here, the squeegee vertical pressure closes the gap when it advances towards the aperture, and the smearings at the stencil underside act, as previously described, as an additional seal that inhibit air being expelled through it. Additional tests including the cleaning of the stencil enhanced the filling completeness of the T-intersection, but the last sealing edge (at line C) still remained incomplete.

Figure 18. Representative specimens printed with four different approaches to avoid the formation of incomplete regions: (a) single squeegee stroke with snap-off distance, (b) double squeegee stroke, (c) double squeegee stroke with snap-off distance, and (d) single squeegee stroke with local tape pieces.

The second and third approaches relied on using two squeegee strokes moving forwards and backwards. The idea here was that a second squeegee stroke could eliminate the incomplete regions by pushing adhesive from the opposite direction. However, this approach was insufficient to completely prevent this print defect as well. Adding a gap of 0.2 mm between stencil and substrate also did not improve the filling completeness. Instead of an incomplete filling, large bubbles usually larger than 1000 µm formed at these regions, see cases (b) and (c) in Figure 18. The main disadvantage of this approach is that it requires at least twice the time for the squeegee process. Yet, an additional squeegee stroke can be considered to have a smaller impact on production efficiency compared to introducing a cleaning step before every single specimen.

For the fourth approach, local gaps of about 0.2 mm height were introduced between the stencil and substrate by adding a small piece of adhesive tape near the edges with filling problems. The main difference to the first approach is that the gap created by the piece of tape does not close due to the squeegee vertical pressure or due to smearings. Thus, a small venting channel is maintained during the squeegee process that allows air to escape the aperture at those edges, ensuring the complete filling of the entire sealing, see Figure 18(d)
. The use of a tape piece was solely a simple method to prove the effectiveness of a local gap and more sophisticated approaches can be used, such as integrating a local elevation or channel on the substrate or stencil.^{[Citation46–48]}

6. Conclusions

The squeegee process to print a basic sealing including relevant design features close to real fuel cell applications was optimized using experimental and numerical approaches. First, incomplete regions and bubbles forming during the squeegee process were detected as the main print defects. An additional stencil containing only lines with and without threads was used to isolate the formation mechanisms of these two defects. It was shown that the stencil cleanliness state considerably impacts the venting conditions inside the aperture during filling and thereby is determinant on the emergence of incomplete regions. Moreover, three main formation mechanisms of bubbles were proposed, evidencing that pre-existing bubbles inside the adhesive roll might be transferred into the aperture by the squeegee movement or produced due to interactions between the adhesive and stencil threads. The developed numerical model presented an overall good agreement with experimental observations and was able to reproduce the formation of incomplete regions and bubbles as well.

By combining experiment and simulation results it was verified that bubbles cannot be completely avoided when using a stencil with threads. However, by adding a new adhesive roll for every new print cycle, the quantity of bubbles can be reduced, and their diameter remained generally smaller than 300 µm, which was considered to have a minor impact on the process reliability. Based on these findings, four different print strategies focused on minimizing the print cycle time were assessed to eliminate incomplete regions emerging in the sealing design. By reorienting the aperture relative to the squeegee direction and maintaining a local gap during the squeegee process, this printing issue was prevented and the reproducible filling of the entire sealing was successfully achieved.

References

Mehta, V.; Cooper, J. S. Review and Analysis of PEM Fuel Cell Design and Manufacturing. J. Power Sources. 2003, 114(1), 32–53. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00542-6.
Jörissen, L.; Garche, J. Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. In Hydrogen and Fuel Cell, 1st ed.; Töpler, J. Lehmann, J., Eds.; Springer Vieweg: Berlin/Heidelberg, 2016; pp. 239–281.
Bieringer, R.; Adler, M.; Geiss, S.; Viol, M. Gaskets: Important Durability Issues. In Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability, Büchi, F., Inaba, M. Schmidt, T., Eds.; Springer: New York, 2009; pp. 271–281. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-85536-3_13.
Heimes, H.; Kehrer, M.; Hagedorn, S.; Hausmann, J.; Krieger, G.; Müller, J. Production of fuel cell components, 2nd ed.; PEM of RWTH Aachen University and VDMA AG Fuel Cell: Aachen, 2022.
Indicatti, F. I.; Rädler, M.; Günter, F.; Stammen, E.; Dilger, K. Stencil Printing of Adhesive-Based Fuel Cell Sealings: The Influence of Rheology on Bubble Formation During the Separation Step. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2022, 238(7), 2552–2567. DOI: 10.1177/09544062221121991.
Indicatti, F. I.; Rädler, M.; Stammen, E.; Dilger, K. Optimizing Adhesive Rheology for Stencil Printing of Fuel Cell Sealings Using Supervised Machine Learning. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2024, 132, 103693. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103693.
Dušek, M.; Hunt, C. A Novel Measurement Technique for Stencil Printed Solder Paste. Solder. Surf. Mount. Technol. 2003, 15(2), 35–45. DOI: 10.1108/09540910310479512.
Zou, L.; Dušek, M.; Wickham, M.; Hunt, C. Characterising Stencil Printing of Surface Mount and Conductive Adhesives; NPL Report. MATC(A)55, 2002.
Freudenberg-NOK. Ice Cube Sealing Prototyping Sheets. https://www.fst.com/-/media/files/gated/solution-sheets/en/ice-cube-sealing_fst.pdf(open in a new window) (accessed Mar 24, 2024).
Freudenberg-NOK. Elastomeric Seals for Bipolar Plates. https://www.fst.com/-/media/files/gated/solution-sheets/en/elastomeric-seals-for-bipolar-plates_fst.pdf(open in a new window) (accessed Mar 24, 2024).
Xu, Q.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z. Effects of Gas Permeation on the Sealing Performance of PEMFC Stacks. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2021, 46(73), 36424–36435. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.137.
Zhao, J.; Guo, H.; Ping, S.; Guo, Z.; Lin, W.; Yang, Y.; Shi, W.; Wang, Z.; Ma, T. Research on Design and Optimization of Large Metal Bipolar Plate Sealing for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Sustainability. 2023, 15(15), 12002. DOI: 10.3390/su151512002.
Tepner, S.; Lorenz, A. Printing Technologies for Silicon Solar Cell Metallization: A Comprehensive Review. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 2023, 31(6), 557–590. DOI: 10.1002/pip.3674.
Hoornstra, J.; Roberts, S.; Moor, H.; Bruton, T. First Experiences with Double Layer Stencil Printing for Low Cost Production Solar Cells. Vienna: 2nd World Conf Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conv. 1998, 1527–1530.
Hoornstra, J.; Moor, H.; Weeber, A.; Wyers, P. Improved Front Side Metallization on Silicon Solar Cells with Stencil Printing. Glasgow: 16th Eur. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf. Exhib. 2000, 1, 5.
Rösch, M. Potenziale und Strategien zur Optimierung des Schablonendruckprozesses in der Elektronikproduktion. Doctoral Dissertation, FAU, Erlangen, 2011.
Seo, W.; Kim, J. Filling Analyses of Solder Paste in the Stencil Printing Process and Its Application to Process Design. Solder Surf. Mt. Technol 2013, 25(3), 145–154. DOI: 10.1108/SSMT-Oct-2012-0022.
Rusdi, M. S.; Abdullah, M. Z.; Ishak, M. H. H.; Aziz, M. S. A.; Abdullah, M. K.; Rethinasamy, P.; Jalar, A. Three-Dimensional CFD Simulation of the Stencil Printing Performance of Solder Paste. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 108(9–10), 3351–3359. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05636-9.
Kumar, S.; Mallik, S.; Ekere, N.; Jung, J. Stencil Printing Behavior of Lead-Free Sn-3Ag-0.5 Cu Solder Paste for Wafer Level Bumping for Sub-100 μm Size Solder Bumps. Met. Mater. Int. 2013, 19(5), 1083–1090. DOI: 10.1007/s12540-013-5025-z.
Barlow, F. D.; Elshabini, A. Ceramic Interconnect Technology Handbook, 1st ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, 2007; p. 227.
Dittrich, S.; Reitz, E.; Schell, K. G.; Bucharsky, E. C.; Hoffmann, M. J. Development and Characterization of Inks for Screen Printing of Glass Solders for SOFCs. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2020, 17(3), 1304–1313. DOI: 10.1111/ijac.13461.
Pennemann, H.; Dobra, M.; Wichert, M.; Kolb, G. Optimization of Wash-Coating Slurries As Catalyst Carrier for Screen Printing into Microstructured Reactors. Chem. Eng. & Technol. 2013, 36(6), 1033–1041. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201200637.
Sborikas, M.; Qiu, X.; Wirges, W.; Gerhard, R.; Jenninger, W.; Lovera, D. Screen Printing for Producing Ferroelectret Systems with Polymer-Electret Films and Well-Defined Cavities. Appl. Phys. A 2014, 114(2), 515–520. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-013-7998-3.
Kamp, M.; Efinger, R.; Gensowski, K.; Bechmann, S.; Bartsch, J.; Glatthaar, M. Structuring of Metal Layers by Electrochemical Screen Printing for Back-Contact Solar Cells. IEEE J. Photovoltaics. 2018, 8(3), 676–682. DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2802201.
Hong, H.; Jiang, L.; Tu, H.; Hu, J.; Yan, X. Formulation of UV Curable Nano-Silver Conductive Ink for Direct Screen-Printing on Common Fabric Substrates for Wearable Electronic Applications. Smart Mater. Struc 2021, 30(4), 045001. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/abe4b3.
Wilson, S.; Howison, S.; Parker, D. Void Elimination in Screen Printed Thick Film Dielectric Pastes. Math. Ind. Rep. 2021, 145, 1–12. DOI: 10.33774/miir-2021-vgnwr.
Bommineedi, L. K.; Upadhyay, N.; Minnes, R. Screen Printing: An Ease Thin Film Technique. In Simple Chemical Methods for Thin Film Deposition: Synthesis and Applications, Sankapal, B., Ennaoui, A., Gupta, R. Lokhande, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 449–507. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-0961-2_11.
Riemer, D. E. Ein Beitrag zur Untersuchung der physikalisch-technischen Grundlagen des Siebdruckverfahrens. Doctoral Dissertation, TU, Berlin, Berlin, 1988.
Krammer, O.; Al-Ma’aiteh, T. I.; Illes, B.; Bušek, D.; Dušek, K. Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Solder Paste Rheological Behaviour and Printing Speed on Stencil Printing. Solder Surf. Mt. Technol. 2020, 32(4), 219–223. DOI: 10.1108/SSMT-11-2019-0037.
Glinski, G. P.; Bailey, C.; Pericleous, K. A. A Non-Newtonian Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Stencil Printing Process. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2001, 215(4), 437–446. DOI: 10.1243/0954406011520869.
Kay, R. W.; Stoyanov, S.; Glinski, G. P.; Bailey, C.; Desmulliez, M. P. Ultra-Fine Pitch Stencil Printing for a Low Cost and Low Temperature Flip-Chip Assembly Process. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 2007, 30(1), 129–136. DOI: 10.1109/TCAPT.2007.892085.
Durairaj, R.; Jackson, G. J.; Ekere, N. N.; Glinski, G.; Bailey, C. Correlation of Solder Paste Rheology with Computational Simulations of the Stencil Printing Process. Solder. Surf. Mount. Technol. 2002, 14(1), 11–17. DOI: 10.1108/09540910210416422.
Ishak, M. H. H.; Ismail, M. I.; Mat, S.; Ismail, F.; Mohd Salleh, M. A. A. Influence of Squeegee Impact on Stencil Printing Process: CFD Approach. IOP Conf. Ser Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 957(1), 012065. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/957/1/012065.
Choi, S. A.; Youn, J. T.; Mok, J. S.; Koo, C. W. Computer Simulation of Ink Transfer in the Different Printing Speed and Ink Viscosity in the Screen Printing. J Korean Graph. Arts Commun Soc. 2011, 29(1), 75–83.
Flow Science, Inc. Santa Fe, NM, USA. FLOW-3D® Version 2023R1. 2023. https://www.flow3d.com/
Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B. Fiji: An Open-Source Platform for Biological-Image Analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012, 9(7), 676–682. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2019.
Preibisch, S.; Saalfeld, S.; Tomancak, P. Globally Optimal Stitching of Tiled 3D Microscopic Image Acquisitions. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25(11), 1463–1465. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184.
FLOW-3D® Version 2023R1 Users Manual. FLOW-3D [Computer Software]; Flow Science, Inc: Santa Fe, NM, 2023. https://www.flow3d.com
Murray, B. R. Characterisation of Rotationally Moulded Polymer Liners for Low Permeability Cryogenic Applications in Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels. Doctoral Dissertation, National University of Ireland, Galway, 2016.
Grimsley, B. W.; Cano, R. J.; Johnston, N. J. Hybrid Composites for LH2 Fuel Tank Structure; NASA Langley Research Center: Hampton, USA, 2001.
Jackson, J. R.; Vickers, J.; Fikes, J. Composite Cryotank Technologies and Development 2.4 and 5.5m Out of Autoclave Tank Test Results. Composites and Advanced Materials Expo (CAMX); Dallas, USA, Oct 26–29, 2015.
Guan, C.; Zhan, L.; Shi, H. Simulation and Experiment Analysis of Relationship Between Voids and Permeability of Composites. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J Mater. Des. Appl. 2022, 236(1), 23–36. DOI: 10.1177/14644207211026942.
Saha, S.; Rani, W. S. A Review on Gas Permeability of Polymer Matrix Composites for Cryogenic Applications. J. Compos. Mater. 2024, 00219983241228550. DOI: 10.1177/00219983241228550.
Yang, T.; Tsai, T. N. A Neurofuzzy-Based Quality-Control System for Fine Pitch Stencil Printing Process in Surface Mount Assembly. J. Intell. Manuf. 2004, 15, 711–721. DOI: 10.1023/B:JIMS.0000037719.35871.aa.
Manessis, D.; Patzelt, R.; Ostmann, A.; Aschenbrenner, R.; Reichl, H. Technical Challenges of Stencil Printing Technology for Ultra Fine Pitch Flip Chip Bumping. Microelectron. Reliab. 2004, 44(5), 797–803. DOI: 10.1016/S0026-2714(03)00361-5.
Indicatti, F. I.; Rädler, M. Device and Method for Printing a Substrate with a Sealant And/Or Adhesive. DE102022209195A1, German Patent and Trade Mark Office, 2024.
Indicatti, F. I.; Rädler, M. Method for Printing a Substrate with a Sealant And/Or Adhesive, Electrochemical Cell with a Printed Seal. DE102022209196A1, German Patent and Trade Mark Office, 2024.
Indicatti, F. I.; Rädler, M. Device and Method for Printing a Substrate with a Sealant And/Or Adhesive. DE102022209197A1, German Patent and Trade Mark Office. 2024.

View Page

Fig. 3. Free surface and substrate profiles in all Sp and Ls cases at t = 1 s, t = 3 s, and t = 5 s, arranged left to right (note: the colour contours correspond to the horizontal component of the flow velocity (u), expressed in m/s).

Numerical investigation of dam break flow over erodible beds with diverse substrate level variations

다양한 기질 수준 변화를 갖는 침식성 층 위의 댐 파손 흐름에 대한 수치 조사

Alireza Khoshkonesh¹, Blaise Nsom², Saeid Okhravi³*, Fariba Ahmadi Dehrashid⁴, Payam Heidarian⁵,
Silvia DiFrancesco⁶
¹Department of Geography, School of Social Sciences, History, and Philosophy, Birkbeck University of London, London, UK.
² Université de Bretagne Occidentale. IRDL/UBO UMR CNRS 6027. Rue de Kergoat, 29285 Brest, France.
³ Institute of Hydrology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84104, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
⁴Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, 65178-38695, Hamedan, Iran.
⁵Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
⁶Niccol`o Cusano University, via Don C. Gnocchi 3, 00166 Rome, Italy. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +421-944624921. E-mail: saeid.okhravi@savba.sk

Abstract

This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the influence of substrate level difference and material composition on dam break wave evolution over two different erodible beds. Utilizing the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method, we tracked free surface advection and reproduced wave evolution using experimental data from the literature. For model validation, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis encompassed mesh resolution, turbulence simulation methods, and bed load transport equations. The implementation of Large Eddy Simulation (LES), non-equilibrium sediment flux, and van Rijn’s (1984) bed load formula yielded higher accuracy compared to alternative approaches. The findings emphasize the significant effect of substrate level difference and material composition on dam break morphodynamic characteristics. Decreasing substrate level disparity led to reduced flow velocity, wavefront progression, free surface height, substrate erosion, and other pertinent parameters. Initial air entrapment proved substantial at the wavefront, illustrating pronounced air-water interaction along the bottom interface. The Shields parameter experienced a one-third reduction as substrate level difference quadrupled, with the highest near-bed concentration observed at the wavefront. This research provides fresh insights into the complex interplay of factors governing dam break wave propagation and morphological changes, advancing our comprehension of this intricate phenomenon.

이 연구는 두 개의 서로 다른 침식층에 대한 댐 파괴파 진화에 대한 기질 수준 차이와 재료 구성의 영향을 종합적으로 조사하는 것을 목표로 했습니다. VOF(유체량) 방법을 활용하여 자유 표면 이류를 추적하고 문헌의 실험 데이터를 사용하여 파동 진화를 재현했습니다.

모델 검증을 위해 메쉬 해상도, 난류 시뮬레이션 방법 및 침대 하중 전달 방정식을 포함하는 포괄적인 민감도 분석을 수행했습니다. LES(Large Eddy Simulation), 비평형 퇴적물 플럭스 및 van Rijn(1984)의 하상 부하 공식의 구현은 대체 접근 방식에 비해 더 높은 정확도를 산출했습니다.

연구 결과는 댐 붕괴 형태역학적 특성에 대한 기질 수준 차이와 재료 구성의 중요한 영향을 강조합니다. 기판 수준 차이가 감소하면 유속, 파면 진행, 자유 표면 높이, 기판 침식 및 기타 관련 매개변수가 감소했습니다.

초기 공기 포집은 파면에서 상당한 것으로 입증되었으며, 이는 바닥 경계면을 따라 뚜렷한 공기-물 상호 작용을 보여줍니다. 기판 레벨 차이가 4배로 증가함에 따라 Shields 매개변수는 1/3로 감소했으며, 파면에서 가장 높은 베드 근처 농도가 관찰되었습니다.

이 연구는 댐 파괴파 전파와 형태학적 변화를 지배하는 요인들의 복잡한 상호 작용에 대한 새로운 통찰력을 제공하여 이 복잡한 현상에 대한 이해를 향상시킵니다.

Keywords

Dam break; Substrate level difference; Erodible bed; Sediment transport; Computational fluid dynamics CFD.

PDF Download

REFERENCES

Aleixo, R., Soares-Frazão, S., Zech, Y., 2010. Velocity profiles in
dam-break flows: water and sediment layers. In: Proc. Int. Conf.
on Fluvial Hydraulics “River Flow 2010”, pp. 533–540.
An, S., Ku, H., Julien, P.Y., 2015. Numerical modelling of local
scour caused by submerged jets. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol., 9, 3,
328–343.
Bahmanpouri, F., Daliri, M., Khoshkonesh, A., Namin, M.M.,
Buccino, M., 2021. Bed compaction effect on dam break flow over
erodible bed; experimental and numerical modeling. J. Hydrol.,
594, 125645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125645
Baklanov, A., 2007. Environmental risk and assessment modelling
– scientific needs and expected advancements. In: Ebel, A.,
Davitashvili, T. (Eds.): Air, Water and Soil Quality Modelling
for Risk and Impact Assessment Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 29–44.
Biscarini, C., Di Francesco, S., Nardi, F., Manciola, P., 2013.
Detailed simulation of complex hydraulic problems with
macroscopic and mesoscopic mathematical methods. Math.
Probl. Eng., 928309. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/928309
Cao, Z., Pender, G., Wallis, S., Carling, P., 2004. Computational
dam-break hydraulics over erodible sediment bed. J. Hydraul.
Eng., 130, 7, 689–703.
Catucci, D., Briganti, R., Heller, V., 2021. Numerical validation of novel
scaling laws for air entrainment in water. Proc. R. Soc. A, 477, 2255,20210339. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0339
Dehrashid, F.A., Heidari, M., Rahimi, H., Khoshkonesh, A., Yuan,
S., Tang, X., Lu, C., Wang, X., 2023. CFD modeling the flow
dynamics in an open channel with double-layered vegetation.
Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 9, 1, 543–555.
Desombre, J., Morichon, D., Mory, M., 2013. RANS v2-f simulation
of a swash event: Detailed flow structure. Coastal Eng., 71, 1–12.
Dodangeh, E., Afzalimehr, H., 2022. Incipient motion of sediment
particles in the presence of bed forms under decelerating and
accelerating flows. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 70, 1, 89–102.
Dong, Z., Wang, J., Vetsch, D.F., Boes, R.M., Tan, G., 2019.
Numerical simulation of air entrainment on stepped
spillways. In: E-proceedings of the 38th IAHR World Congress
(pp. 1494). September 1–6, 2019, Panama City, Panama. DOI:
10.3850/38WC092019-0755
Flow3D [computer software]. 2023. Santa Fe, NM: Flow Science,
Inc.
Fraccarollo, L., Capart, H., 2002. Riemann wave description of
erosional dam-break flows. J. Fluid Mech., 461, 183–228.
Gu, Z., Wang, T., Meng, W., Yu, C.H., An, R., 2023. Numerical
investigation of silted-up dam-break flow with different silted-up
sediment heights. Water Supply, 23, 2, 599–614.
Gualtieri, P., De Felice, S., Pasquino, V., Doria, G.P., 2018. Use of
conventional flow resistance equations and a model for the
Nikuradse roughness in vegetated flows at high submergence. J.
Hydrol. Hydromech., 66, 1, 107–120.
Heller, V., 2011. Scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering
models. J. Hydraul. Res., 49, 3, 293–306.
Hirt, C.W., 2003. Modeling turbulent entrainment of air at a free
surface. Flow Science, Inc.
Hirt, C.W., Nichols, B.D., 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for
the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys., 39, 1, 201–
225.
Issakhov, A., Zhandaulet, Y., Nogaeva, A., 2018. Numerical
simulation of dam break flow for various forms of the obstacle
by VOF method. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 109, 191–206.
Khayyer, A., Gotoh, H., 2010. On particle-based simulation of a dam
break over a wet bed. J. Hydraul. Res., 48, 2, 238–249.
Khoshkonesh, A., Daliri, M., Riaz, K., Dehrashid, F.A.,
Bahmanpouri, F., Di Francesco, S., 2022. Dam-break flow
dynamics over a stepped channel with vegetation. J. Hydrol., 613,128395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128395
Khoshkonesh, A., Nsom, B., Gohari, S., Banejad, H., 2019.
A comprehensive study on dam-break flow over dry and wet
beds. Ocean Eng., 188, 106279.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106279
Khoshkonesh, A., Sadeghi, S.H., Gohari, S., Karimpour, S., Oodi,
S., Di Francesco, S., 2023. Study of dam-break flow over a
vegetated channel with and without a drop. Water Resour.
Manage., 37, 5, 2107–2123.
Khosravi, K., Chegini, A.H.N., Cooper, J., Mao, L., Habibnejad, M.,
Shahedi, K., Binns, A., 2021. A laboratory investigation of bedload transport of gravel sediments under dam break flow. Int. J.
Sediment Res., 36, 2, 229–234.
Kim, Y., Zhou, Z., Hsu, T.J., Puleo, J.A., 2017. Large eddy
simulation of dam‐break‐driven swash on a rough‐planar beach.
J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 122, 2, 1274–1296.
Kocaman, S., Ozmen-Cagatay, H., 2012. The effect of lateral
channel contraction on dam break flows: Laboratory experiment.
J. Hydrol., 432, 145–153.
Leal, J.G., Ferreira, R.M., Cardoso, A.H., 2006. Dam-break wavefront celerity. J. Hydraul. Eng., 132, 1, 69–76.
Leal, J.G.A.B., Ferreira, R.M., Cardoso, A.H., 2003. Dam-break
wave propagation over a cohesionless erodible bed. In: Proc.
30rd IAHR Congress, 100, 261–268.
Li, Y. L., Ma, Y., Deng, R., Jiang, D.P., Hu, Z., 2019. Research on
dam-break induced tsunami bore acting on the triangular
breakwater based on high order 3D CLSVOF-THINC/WLICIBM approaching. Ocean Eng., 182, 645–659.
Li, Y.L., Yu, C.H., 2019. Research on dam-break flow induced front
wave impacting a vertical wall based on the CLSVOF and level
set methods. Ocean Eng., 178, 442–462.
Mei, S., Chen, S., Zhong, Q., Shan, Y., 2022. Detailed numerical
modeling for breach hydrograph and morphology evolution
during landslide dam breaching. Landslides, 19, 12, 2925–2949.
Meng, W., Yu, C.H., Li, J., An, R., 2022. Three-dimensional simulation
of silted-up dam-break flow striking a rigid structure. Ocean Eng.,
261, 112042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112042
Meyer-Peter, E., Müller, R., 1948. Formulas for bed-load transport.
In: IAHSR 2nd meeting, Stockholm, appendix 2. IAHR.
Nielsen, P., 1984. Field measurements of time-averaged suspended
sediment concentrations under waves. Coastal Eng., 8, 1, 51–72.
Nielsen, P., 2018. Bed shear stress, surface shape and velocity field
near the tips of dam-breaks, tsunami and wave runup. Coastal
Eng., 138, 126–131.
Nsom, B., Latrache, N., Ramifidisoa, L., Khoshkonesh, A., 2019.
Analytical solution to the stability of gravity-driven stratified
flow of two liquids over an inclined plane. In: 24th French
Mechanics Congress in Brest. Brest, p. 244178.
Nsom, B., Ravelo, B., Ndong, W., 2008. Flow regimes in horizontal
viscous dam-break flow of Cayous mud. Appl. Rheol., 18, 4,
43577-1. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2008-0012
Oguzhan, S., Aksoy, A.O., 2020. Experimental investigation of the
effect of vegetation on dam break flood waves. J. Hydrol.
Hydromech., 68, 3, 231–241.
Okhravi, S., Gohari, S., Alemi, M., Maia, R., 2022. Effects of bedmaterial gradation on clear water scour at single and group of
piles. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 70, 1, 114–127.
Okhravi, S., Gohari, S., Alemi, M., Maia, R., 2023. Numerical
modeling of local scour of non-uniform graded sediment for two
arrangements of pile groups. Int. J. Sediment Res., 38, 4, 597–614.
Parambath, A., 2010. Impact of tsunamis on near shore wind power
units. Master’s Thesis. Texas A&M University. Available
electronically from https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU2010-12-8919
Pintado-Patiño, J.C., Puleo, J.A., Krafft, D., Torres-Freyermuth, A.,

Hydrodynamics and sediment transport under a dambreak-driven swash: An experimental study. Coastal Eng., 170,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.103986
Riaz, K., Aslam, H.M.S., Yaseen, M.W., Ahmad, H.H.,
Khoshkonesh, A., Noshin, S., 2022. Flood frequency analysis
and hydraulic design of bridge at Mashan on river Kunhar. Arch.
Hydroengineering Environ. Mech., 69, 1, 1–12.
Ritter, A., 1892. Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen. Zeitschrift
des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, 36, 33, 947–954. (In
German.)
Smagorinsky, J., 1963. General circulation experiments with the
primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather
Rev., 91, 3, 99–164.
Soulsby, R.L., 1997. Dynamics of marine sands: a manual for
practical applications. Oceanogr. Lit. Rev., 9, 44, 947.
Spinewine, B., Capart, H., 2013. Intense bed-load due to a sudden
dam-break. J. Fluid Mech., 731, 579–614.
Van Rijn, L.C., 1984. Sediment transport, part I: bed load transport.
J. Hydraul. Eng., 110, 10, 1431–1456.
Vosoughi, F., Rakhshandehroo, G., Nikoo, M.R., Sadegh, M.,
Experimental study and numerical verification of
silted-up dam break. J. Hydrol., 590, 125267.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125267
Wu, W., Wang, S.S., 2008. One-dimensional explicit finite-volume
model for sediment transport. J. Hydraul. Res., 46, 1, 87–98.
Xu, T., Huai, W., Liu, H., 2023. MPS-based simulation of
dam-break wave propagation over wet beds with a
sediment layer. Ocean Eng., 281, 115035.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115035
Yang, S., Yang, W., Qin, S., Li, Q., Yang, B., 2018. Numerical study
on characteristics of dam-break wave. Ocean Eng., 159, 358–371.
Yao, G.F., 2004. Development of new pressure-velocity solvers in
FLOW-3D. Flow Science, Inc., USA.

PDF Download

FLOW-3D CAST Bibliography

아래는 FSI의 금속 주조 참고 문헌에 수록된 기술 논문 모음입니다. 이 모든 논문에는 FLOW-3D CAST 해석 결과가 수록되어 있습니다. FLOW-3D CAST를 사용하여 금속 주조 산업의 응용 프로그램을 성공적으로 시뮬레이션하는 방법에 대해 자세히 알아보십시오.

Below is a collection of technical papers in our Metal Casting Bibliography. All of these papers feature FLOW-3D CAST results. Learn more about how FLOW-3D CAST can be used to successfully simulate applications for the Metal Casting Industry.

33-20 Eric Riedel, Martin Liepe Stefan Scharf, Simulation of ultrasonic induced cavitation and acoustic streaming in liquid and solidifying aluminum, Metals, 10.4; 476, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/met10040476

20-20 Wu Yue, Li Zhuo and Lu Rong, Simulation and visual tester verification of solid propellant slurry vacuum plate casting, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2020. doi.org/10.1002/prep.201900411

17-20 C.A. Jones, M.R. Jolly, A.E.W. Jarfors and M. Irwin, An experimental characterization of thermophysical properties of a porous ceramic shell used in the investment casting process, Supplimental Proceedings, pp. 1095-1105, TMS 2020 149th Annual Meeting and Exhibition, San Diego, CA, February 23-27, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36296-6_102

12-20 Franz Josef Feikus, Paul Bernsteiner, Ricardo Fernández Gutiérrez and Michal Luszczak , Further development of electric motor housings, MTZ Worldwide, 81, pp. 38-43, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s38313-019-0176-z

09-20 Mingfan Qi, Yonglin Kang, Yuzhao Xu, Zhumabieke Wulabieke and Jingyuan Li, A novel rheological high pressure die-casting process for preparing large thin-walled Al–Si–Fe–Mg–Sr alloy with high heat conductivity, high plasticity and medium strength, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 776, art. no. 139040, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139040

07-20 Stefan Heugenhauser, Erhard Kaschnitz and Peter Schumacher, Development of an aluminum compound casting process – Experiments and numerical simulations, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 279, art. no. 116578, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116578

05-20 Michail Papanikolaou, Emanuele Pagone, Mark Jolly and Konstantinos Salonitis, Numerical simulation and evaluation of Campbell running and gating systems, Metals, 10.1, art. no. 68, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/met10010068

102-19 Ferencz Peti and Gabriela Strnad, The effect of squeeze pin dimension and operational parameters on material homogeneity of aluminium high pressure die cast parts, Acta Marisiensis. Seria Technologica, 16.2, 2019. doi.org/0.2478/amset-2019-0010

94-19 E. Riedel, I. Horn, N. Stein, H. Stein, R. Bahr, and S. Scharf, Ultrasonic treatment: a clean technology that supports sustainability incasting processes, Procedia, 26th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, May 7-9, 2019.

93-19 Adrian V. Catalina, Liping Xue, Charles A. Monroe, Robin D. Foley, and John A. Griffin, Modeling and Simulation of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AlSi- and AlCu-based Alloys, Transactions, 123rd Metalcasting Congress, Atlanta, GA, USA, April 27-30, 2019.

84-19 Arun Prabhakar, Michail Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Salonitis, and Mark Jolly, Sand casting of sheet lead: numerical simulation of metal flow and solidification, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, pp. 1-13, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04522-3

72-19 Santosh Reddy Sama, Eric Macdonald, Robert Voigt, and Guha Manogharan, Measurement of metal velocity in sand casting during mold filling, Metals, 9:1079, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/met9101079

71-19 Sebastian Findeisen, Robin Van Der Auwera, Michael Heuser, and Franz-Josef Wöstmann, Gießtechnische Fertigung von E-Motorengehäusen mit interner Kühling (Casting production of electric motor housings with internal cooling), Geisserei, 106, pp. 72-78, 2019 (in German).

58-19 Von Malte Leonhard, Matthias Todte, and Jörg Schäffer, Realistic simulation of the combustion of exothermic feeders, Casting, No. 2, pp. 28-32, 2019. In English and German.

52-19 S. Lakkum and P. Kowitwarangkul, Numerical investigations on the effect of gas flow rate in the gas stirred ladle with dual plugs, International Conference on Materials Research and Innovation (ICMARI), Bangkok, Thailand, December 17-21, 2018. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 526, 2019. doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/526/1/012028

47-19 Bing Zhou, Shuai Lu, Kaile Xu, Chun Xu, and Zhanyong Wang, Microstructure and simulation of semisolid aluminum alloy castings in the process of stirring integrated transfer-heat (SIT) with water cooling, International Journal of Metalcasting, Online edition, pp. 1-13, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-019-00357-6

31-19 Zihao Yuan, Zhipeng Guo, and S.M. Xiong, Skin layer of A380 aluminium alloy die castings and its blistering during solution treatment, Journal of Materials Science & Technology, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1906-1916, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.05.011

25-19 Stefano Mascetti, Raul Pirovano, and Giulio Timelli, Interazione metallo liquido/stampo: Il fenomeno della metallizzazione, La Metallurgia Italiana, No. 4, pp. 44-50, 2019. In Italian.

20-19 Fu-Yuan Hsu, Campbellology for runner system design, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 187-199, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_19

19-19 Chengcheng Lyu, Michail Papanikolaou, and Mark Jolly, Numerical process modelling and simulation of Campbell running systems designs, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 53-64, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_5

18-19 Adrian V. Catalina, Liping Xue, and Charles Monroe, A solidification model with application to AlSi-based alloys, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 201-213, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_20

17-19 Fu-Yuan Hsu and Yu-Hung Chen, The validation of feeder modeling for ductile iron castings, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 227-238, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_22

04-19 Santosh Reddy Sama, Tony Badamo, Paul Lynch and Guha Manogharan, Novel sprue designs in metal casting via 3D sand-printing, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 25, pp. 563-578, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.009

02-19 Jingying Sun, Qichi Le, Li Fu, Jing Bai, Johannes Tretter, Klaus Herbold and Hongwei Huo, Gas entrainment behavior of aluminum alloy engine crankcases during the low-pressure-die-casting-process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 266, pp. 274-282, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.016

92-18 Fast, Flexible… More Versatile, Foundry Management Technology, March, 2018.

82-18 Xu Zhao, Ping Wang, Tao Li, Bo-yu Zhang, Peng Wang, Guan-zhou Wang and Shi-qi Lu, Gating system optimization of high pressure die casting thin-wall AlSi10MnMg longitudinal loadbearing beam based on numerical simulation, China Foundry, Vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 436-442, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s41230-018-8052-z

80-18 Michail Papanikolaou, Emanuele Pagone, Konstantinos Salonitis, Mark Jolly and Charalampos Makatsoris, A computational framework towards energy efficient casting processes, Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2018: Proceedings of the 5^th International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (KES-SDM-18), Gold Coast, Australia, June 24-26 2018, SIST 130, pp. 263-276, 2019. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04290-5_27

64-18 Vasilios Fourlakidis, Ilia Belov and Attila Diószegi, Strength prediction for pearlitic lamellar graphite iron: Model validation, Metals, Vol. 8, No. 9, 2018. doi.org/10.3390/met8090684

51-18 Xue-feng Zhu, Bao-yi Yu, Li Zheng, Bo-ning Yu, Qiang Li, Shu-ning Lü and Hao Zhang, Influence of pouring methods on filling process, microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ91 Mg alloy pipe by horizontal centrifugal casting, China Foundry, vol. 15, no. 3, pp.196-202, 2018. doi.org/10.1007/s41230-018-7256-6

47-18 Santosh Reddy Sama, Jiayi Wang and Guha Manogharan, Non-conventional mold design for metal casting using 3D sand-printing, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 34-B, pp. 765-775, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.03.049

42-18 M. Koru and O. Serçe, The Effects of Thermal and Dynamical Parameters and Vacuum Application on Porosity in High-Pressure Die Casting of A383 Al-Alloy, International Journal of Metalcasting, pp. 1-17, 2018. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-018-0214-7

41-18 Abhilash Viswanath, S. Savithri, U.T.S. Pillai, Similitude analysis on flow characteristics of water, A356 and AM50 alloys during LPC process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 257, pp. 270-277, 2018. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.031

29-18 Seyboldt, Christoph and Liewald, Mathias, Investigation on thixojoining to produce hybrid components with intermetallic phase, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1960, no. 1, 2018. doi.org/10.1063/1.5034992

28-18 Laura Schomer, Mathias Liewald and Kim Rouven Riedmüller, Simulation of the infiltration process of a ceramic open-pore body with a metal alloy in semi-solid state to design the manufacturing of interpenetrating phase composites, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1960, no. 1, 2018. doi.org/10.1063/1.5034991

41-17 Y. N. Wu et al., Numerical Simulation on Filling Optimization of Copper Rotor for High Efficient Electric Motors in Die Casting Process, Materials Science Forum, Vol. 898, pp. 1163-1170, 2017.

12-17 A.M. Zarubin and O.A. Zarubina, Controlling the flow rate of melt in gravity die casting of aluminum alloys, Liteynoe Proizvodstvo (Casting Manufacturing), pp 16-20, 6, 2017. In Russian.

10-17 A.Y. Korotchenko, Y.V. Golenkov, M.V. Tverskoy and D.E. Khilkov, Simulation of the Flow of Metal Mixtures in the Mold, Liteynoe Proizvodstvo (Casting Manufacturing), pp 18-22, 5, 2017. In Russian.

08-17 Morteza Morakabian Esfahani, Esmaeil Hajjari, Ali Farzadi and Seyed Reza Alavi Zaree, Prediction of the contact time through modeling of heat transfer and fluid flow in compound casting process of Al/Mg light metals, Journal of Materials Research, © Materials Research Society 2017

04-17 Huihui Liu, Xiongwei He and Peng Guo, Numerical simulation on semi-solid die-casting of magnesium matrix composite based on orthogonal experiment, AIP Conference Proceedings 1829, 020037 (2017); doi.org/10.1063/1.4979769.

100-16 Robert Watson, New numerical techniques to quantify and predict the effect of entrainment defects, applied to high pressure die casting, PhD Thesis: University of Birmingham, 2016.

88-16 M.C. Carter, T. Kauffung, L. Weyenberg and C. Peters, Low Pressure Die Casting Simulation Discovery through Short Shot, Cast Expo & Metal Casting Congress, April 16-19, 2016, Minneapolis, MN, Copyright 2016 American Foundry Society.

61-16 M. Koru and O. Serçe, Experimental and numerical determination of casting mold interfacial heat transfer coefficient in the high pressure die casting of a 360 aluminum alloy, ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, Vol. 129 (2016)

59-16 R. Pirovano and S. Mascetti, Tracking of collapsed bubbles during a filling simulation, La Metallurgia Italiana – n. 6 2016

43-16 Kevin Lee, Understanding shell cracking during de-wax process in investment casting, Ph.D Thesis: University of Birmingham, School of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, 2016.

35-16 Konstantinos Salonitis, Mark Jolly, Binxu Zeng, and Hamid Mehrabi, Improvements in energy consumption and environmental impact by novel single shot melting process for casting, Journal of Cleaner Production, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.165, Open Access funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, June 29, 2016

20-16 Fu-Yuan Hsu, Bifilm Defect Formation in Hydraulic Jump of Liquid Aluminum, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2016, Band: 47, Heft 3, 1634-1648.

15-16 Mingfan Qia, Yonglin Kanga, Bing Zhoua, Wanneng Liaoa, Guoming Zhua, Yangde Lib,and Weirong Li, A forced convection stirring process for Rheo-HPDC aluminum and magnesium alloys, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 234 (2016) 353–367

112-15 José Miguel Gonçalves Ledo Belo da Costa, Optimization of filling systems for low pressure by FLOW-3D, Dissertação de mestrado integrado em Engenharia Mecânica, 2015.

89-15 B.W. Zhu, L.X. Li, X. Liu, L.Q. Zhang and R. Xu, Effect of Viscosity Measurement Method to Simulate High Pressure Die Casting of Thin-Wall AlSi10MnMg Alloy Castings, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Published online, November 2015, doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1783-8, © ASM International.

88-15 Peng Zhang, Zhenming Li, Baoliang Liu, Wenjiang Ding and Liming Peng, Improved tensile properties of a new aluminum alloy for high pressure die casting, Materials Science & Engineering A651(2016)376–390, Available online, November 2015.

83-15 Zu-Qi Hu, Xin-Jian Zhang and Shu-Sen Wu, Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Die-Filling Behavior of High-Performance Die-Cast Al–Mg–Si–Mn Alloy, Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), doi.org/10.1007/s40195-015-0332-7, © The Chinese Society for Metals and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015.

82-15 J. Müller, L. Xue, M.C. Carter, C. Thoma, M. Fehlbier and M. Todte, A Die Spray Cooling Model for Thermal Die Cycling Simulations, 2015 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, October 2015

81-15 M. T. Murray, L.F. Hansen, L. Chilcott, E. Li and A.M. Murray, Case Studies in the Use of Simulation- Improved Yield and Reduced Time to Market, 2015 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, October 2015

80-15 R. Bhola, S. Chandra and D. Souders, Predicting Castability of Thin-Walled Parts for the HPDC Process Using Simulations, 2015 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, October 2015

76-15 Prosenjit Das, Sudip K. Samanta, Shashank Tiwari and Pradip Dutta, Die Filling Behaviour of Semi Solid A356 Al Alloy Slurry During Rheo Pressure Die Casting, Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, pp 1-6, October 2015

74-15 Murat KORU and Orhan SERÇE, Yüksek Basınçlı Döküm Prosesinde Enjeksiyon Parametrelerine Bağlı Olarak Döküm Simülasyon, Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science, Science Journal (CSJ), Vol. 36, No: 5 (2015) ISSN: 1300-1949, May 2015

69-15 A. Viswanath, S. Sivaraman, U. T. S. Pillai, Computer Simulation of Low Pressure Casting Process Using FLOW-3D, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 830-831, pp. 45-48, September 2015

68-15 J. Aneesh Kumar, K. Krishnakumar and S. Savithri, Computer Simulation of Centrifugal Casting Process Using FLOW-3D, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 830-831, pp. 53-56, September 2015

59-15 F. Hosseini Yekta and S. A. Sadough Vanini, Simulation of the flow of semi-solid steel alloy using an enhanced model, Metals and Materials International, August 2015.

44-15 Ulrich E. Klotz, Tiziana Heiss and Dario Tiberto, Platinum investment casting material properties, casting simulation and optimum process parameters, Jewelry Technology Forum 2015

41-15 M. Barkhudarov and R. Pirovano, Minimizing Air Entrainment in High Pressure Die Casting Shot Sleeves, GIFA 2015, Düsseldorf, Germany

40-15 M. Todte, A. Fent, and H. Lang, Simulation in support of the development of innovative processes in the casting industry, GIFA 2015, Düsseldorf, Germany

19-15 Bruce Morey, Virtual casting improves powertrain design, Automotive Engineering, SAE International, March 2015.

15-15 K.S. Oh, J.D. Lee, S.J. Kim and J.Y. Choi, Development of a large ingot continuous caster, Metall. Res. Technol. 112, 203 (2015) © EDP Sciences, 2015, doi.org/10.1051/metal/2015006, www.metallurgical-research.org

14-15 Tiziana Heiss, Ulrich E. Klotz and Dario Tiberto, Platinum Investment Casting, Part I: Simulation and Experimental Study of the Casting Process, Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2015, 59, (2), 95, doi.org/10.1595/205651315×687399

138-14 Christopher Thoma, Wolfram Volk, Ruben Heid, Klaus Dilger, Gregor Banner and Harald Eibisch, Simulation-based prediction of the fracture elongation as a failure criterion for thin-walled high-pressure die casting components, International Journal of Metalcasting, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 47-54, 2014. doi.org/10.1007/BF03355594

107-14 Mehran Seyed Ahmadi, Dissolution of Si in Molten Al with Gas Injection, ProQuest Dissertations And Theses; Thesis (Ph.D.), University of Toronto (Canada), 2014; Publication Number: AAT 3637106; ISBN: 9781321195231; Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-02(E), Section: B.; 191 p.

99-14 R. Bhola and S. Chandra, Predicting Castability for Thin-Walled HPDC Parts, Foundry Management Technology, December 2014

92-14 Warren Bishenden and Changhua Huang, Venting design and process optimization of die casting process for structural components; Part II: Venting design and process optimization, Die Casting Engineer, November 2014

90-14 Ken’ichi Kanazawa, Ken’ichi Yano, Jun’ichi Ogura, and Yasunori Nemoto, Optimum Runner Design for Die-Casting using CFD Simulations and Verification with Water-Model Experiments, Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2014, November 14-20, 2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, IMECE2014-37419

89-14 P. Kapranos, C. Carney, A. Pola, and M. Jolly, Advanced Casting Methodologies: Investment Casting, Centrifugal Casting, Squeeze Casting, Metal Spinning, and Batch Casting, In Comprehensive Materials Processing; McGeough, J., Ed.; 2014, Elsevier Ltd., 2014; Vol. 5, pp 39–67.

77-14 Andrei Y. Korotchenko, Development of Scientific and Technological Approaches to Casting Net-Shaped Castings in Sand Molds Free of Shrinkage Defects and Hot Tears, Post-doctoral thesis: Russian State Technological University, 2014. In Russian.

69-14 L. Xue, M.C. Carter, A.V. Catalina, Z. Lin, C. Li, and C. Qiu, Predicting, Preventing Core Gas Defects in Steel Castings, Modern Casting, September 2014

68-14 L. Xue, M.C. Carter, A.V. Catalina, Z. Lin, C. Li, and C. Qiu, Numerical Simulation of Core Gas Defects in Steel Castings, Copyright 2014 American Foundry Society, 118th Metalcasting Congress, April 8 – 11, 2014, Schaumburg, IL

51-14 Jesus M. Blanco, Primitivo Carranza, Rafael Pintos, Pedro Arriaga, and Lakhdar Remaki, Identification of Defects Originated during the Filling of Cast Pieces through Particles Modelling, 11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI), 5th European Conference on Computational Mechanics (ECCM V), 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI), E. Oñate, J. Oliver and A. Huerta (Eds)

47-14 B. Vijaya Ramnatha, C.Elanchezhiana, Vishal Chandrasekhar, A. Arun Kumarb, S. Mohamed Asif, G. Riyaz Mohamed, D. Vinodh Raj , C .Suresh Kumar, Analysis and Optimization of Gating System for Commutator End Bracket, Procedia Materials Science 6 ( 2014 ) 1312 – 1328, 3rd International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterisation (ICMPC 2014)

42-14 Bing Zhou, Yong-lin Kang, Guo-ming Zhu, Jun-zhen Gao, Ming-fan Qi, and Huan-huan Zhang, Forced convection rheoforming process for preparation of 7075 aluminum alloy semisolid slurry and its numerical simulation, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 24(2014) 1109−1116

37-14 A. Karwinski, W. Lesniewski, P. Wieliczko, and M. Malysza, Casting of Titanium Alloys in Centrifugal Induction Furnaces, Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, Volume 59, Issue 1, doi.org/10.2478/amm-2014-0068, 2014.

26-14 Bing Zhou, Yonglin Kang, Mingfan Qi, Huanhuan Zhang and Guoming Zhu, R-HPDC Process with Forced Convection Mixing Device for Automotive Part of A380 Aluminum Alloy, Materials 2014, 7, 3084-3105; doi.org/10.3390/ma7043084

20-14 Johannes Hartmann, Tobias Fiegl, Carolin Körner, Aluminum integral foams with tailored density profile by adapted blowing agents, Applied Physics A, doi.org/10.1007/s00339-014-8377-4, March 2014.

19-14 A.Y. Korotchenko, N.A. Nikiforova, E.D. Demjanov, N.C. Larichev, The Influence of the Filling Conditions on the Service Properties of the Part Side Frame, Russian Foundryman, 1 (January), pp 40-43, 2014. In Russian.

11-14 B. Fuchs and C. Körner, Mesh resolution consideration for the viability prediction of lost salt cores in the high pressure die casting process, Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2014, Copyright © 2014 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

08-14 FY Hsu, SW Wang, and HJ Lin, The External and Internal Shrinkages in Aluminum Gravity Castings, Shape Casting: 5th International Symposium 2014. Available online at Google Books

103-13 B. Fuchs, H. Eibisch and C. Körner, Core Viability Simulation for Salt Core Technology in High-Pressure Die Casting, International Journal of Metalcasting, July 2013, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 39–45

94-13 Randall S. Fielding, J. Crapps, C. Unal, and J.R.Kennedy, Metallic Fuel Casting Development and Parameter Optimization Simulations, International Conference on Fast reators and Related Fuel Cycles (FR13), 4-7 March 2013, Paris France

90-13 A. Karwińskia, M. Małyszaa, A. Tchórza, A. Gila, B. Lipowska, Integration of Computer Tomography and Simulation Analysis in Evaluation of Quality of Ceramic-Carbon Bonded Foam Filter, Archives of Foundry Engineering, doi.org/10.2478/afe-2013-0084, Published quarterly as the organ of the Foundry Commission of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ISSN, (2299-2944), Volume 13, Issue 4/2013

88-13 Litie and Metallurgia (Casting and Metallurgy), 3 (72), 2013, N.V.Sletova, I.N.Volnov, S.P.Zadrutsky, V.A.Chaikin, Modeling of the Process of Removing Non-metallic Inclusions in Aluminum Alloys Using the FLOW-3D program, pp 138-140. In Russian.

85-13 Michał Szucki,Tomasz Goraj, Janusz Lelito, Józef S. Suchy, Numerical Analysis of Solid Particles Flow in Liquid Metal, XXXVII International Scientific Conference Foundryman’ Day 2013, Krakow, 28-29 November 2013

84-13 Körner, C., Schwankl, M., Himmler, D., Aluminum-Aluminum compound castings by electroless deposited zinc layers, Journal of Materials Processing Technology (2014), doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.01483-13.

77-13 Antonio Armillotta & Raffaello Baraggi & Simone Fasoli, SLM tooling for die casting with conformal cooling channels, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5523-7, December 2013.

64-13 Johannes Hartmann, Christina Blümel, Stefan Ernst, Tobias Fiegl, Karl-Ernst Wirth, Carolin Körner, Aluminum integral foam castings with microcellular cores by nano-functionalization, J Mater Sci, doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7668-z, September 2013.

46-13 Nicholas P. Orenstein, 3D Flow and Temperature Analysis of Filling a Plutonium Mold, LA-UR-13-25537, Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Los Alamos Annual Student Symposium 2013, 2013-07-24 (Rev.1)

42-13 Yang Yue, William D. Griffiths, and Nick R. Green, Modelling of the Effects of Entrainment Defects on Mechanical Properties in a Cast Al-Si-Mg Alloy, Materials Science Forum, 765, 225, 2013.

39-13 J. Crapps, D.S. DeCroix, J.D Galloway, D.A. Korzekwa, R. Aikin, R. Fielding, R. Kennedy, C. Unal, Separate effects identification via casting process modeling for experimental measurement of U-Pu-Zr alloys, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 15 July 2013.

35-13 A. Pari, Real Life Problem Solving through Simulations in the Die Casting Industry – Case Studies, © Die Casting Engineer, July 2013.

34-13 Martin Lagler, Use of Simulation to Predict the Viability of Salt Cores in the HPDC Process – Shot Curve as a Decisive Criterion, © Die Casting Engineer, July 2013.

24-13 I.N.Volnov, Optimizatsia Liteynoi Tekhnologii, (Casting Technology Optimization), Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), 3, 2013, 27-29. In Russian

23-13 M.R. Barkhudarov, I.N. Volnov, Minimizatsia Zakhvata Vozdukha v Kamere Pressovania pri Litie pod Davleniem, (Minimization of Air Entrainment in the Shot Sleeve During High Pressure Die Casting), Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), 3, 2013, 30-34. In Russian

09-13 M.C. Carter and L. Xue, Simulating the Parameters that Affect Core Gas Defects in Metal Castings, Copyright 2012 American Foundry Society, Presented at the 2013 CastExpo, St. Louis, Missouri, April 2013

08-13 C. Reilly, N.R. Green, M.R. Jolly, J.-C. Gebelin, The Modelling Of Oxide Film Entrainment In Casting Systems Using Computational Modelling, Applied Mathematical Modelling, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.03.061, April 2013.

03-13 Alexandre Reikher and Krishna M. Pillai, A fast simulation of transient metal flow and solidification in a narrow channel. Part II. Model validation and parametric study, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.12.061.

02-13 Alexandre Reikher and Krishna M. Pillai, A fast simulation of transient metal flow and solidification in a narrow channel. Part I: Model development using lubrication approximation, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.12.060.

116-12 Jufu Jianga, Ying Wang, Gang Chena, Jun Liua, Yuanfa Li and Shoujing Luo, “Comparison of mechanical properties and microstructure of AZ91D alloy motorcycle wheels formed by die casting and double control forming, Materials & Design, Volume 40, September 2012, Pages 541-549.

107-12 F.K. Arslan, A.H. Hatman, S.Ö. Ertürk, E. Güner, B. Güner, An Evaluation for Fundamentals of Die Casting Materials Selection and Design, IMMC’16 International Metallurgy & Materials Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 2012.

103-12 WU Shu-sen, ZHONG Gu, AN Ping, WAN Li, H. NAKAE, Microstructural characteristics of Al−20Si−2Cu−0.4Mg−1Ni alloy formed by rheo-squeeze casting after ultrasonic vibration treatment, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 22 (2012) 2863-2870, November 2012. Full paper available online.

109-12 Alexandre Reikher, Numerical Analysis of Die-Casting Process in Thin Cavities Using Lubrication Approximation, Ph.D. Thesis: The University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Engineering Department (2012) Theses and Dissertations. Paper 65.

97-12 Hong Zhou and Li Heng Luo, Filling Pattern of Step Gating System in Lost Foam Casting Process and its Application, Advanced Materials Research, Volumes 602-604, Progress in Materials and Processes, 1916-1921, December 2012.

93-12 Liangchi Zhang, Chunliang Zhang, Jeng-Haur Horng and Zichen Chen, Functions of Step Gating System in the Lost Foam Casting Process, Advanced Materials Research, 591-593, 940, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.591-593.940, November 2012.

91-12 Hong Yan, Jian Bin Zhu, Ping Shan, Numerical Simulation on Rheo-Diecasting of Magnesium Matrix Composites, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.192-193.287, Solid State Phenomena, 192-193, 287.

89-12 Alexandre Reikher and Krishna M. Pillai, A Fast Numerical Simulation for Modeling Simultaneous Metal Flow and Solidification in Thin Cavities Using the Lubrication Approximation, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications: An International Journal of Computation and Methodology, 63:2, 75-100, November 2012.

82-12 Jufu Jiang, Gang Chen, Ying Wang, Zhiming Du, Weiwei Shan, and Yuanfa Li, Microstructure and mechanical properties of thin-wall and high-rib parts of AM60B Mg alloy formed by double control forming and die casting under the optimal conditions, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.086, October 2012.

78-12 A. Pari, Real Life Problem Solving through Simulations in the Die Casting Industry – Case Studies, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, © NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

77-12 Y. Wang, K. Kabiri-Bamoradian and R.A. Miller, Rheological behavior models of metal matrix alloys in semi-solid casting process, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, © NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

76-12 A. Reikher and H. Gerber, Analysis of Solidification Parameters During the Die Cast Process, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, © NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

75-12 R.A. Miller, Y. Wang and K. Kabiri-Bamoradian, Estimating Cavity Fill Time, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, © NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

65-12 X.H. Yang, T.J. Lu, T. Kim, Influence of non-conducting pore inclusions on phase change behavior of porous media with constant heat flux boundary, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Available online 10 October 2012. Available online at SciVerse.

55-12 Hejun Li, Pengyun Wang, Lehua Qi, Hansong Zuo, Songyi Zhong, Xianghui Hou, 3D numerical simulation of successive deposition of uniform molten Al droplets on a moving substrate and experimental validation, Computational Materials Science, Volume 65, December 2012, Pages 291–301.

52-12 Hongbing Ji, Yixin Chen and Shengzhou Chen, Numerical Simulation of Inner-Outer Couple Cooling Slab Continuous Casting in the Filling Process, Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 557-559), Advanced Materials and Processes II, pp. 2257-2260, July 2012.

47-12 Petri Väyrynen, Lauri Holappa, and Seppo Louhenkilpi, Simulation of Melting of Alloying Materials in Steel Ladle, SCANMET IV – 4th International Conference on Process Development in Iron and Steelmaking, Lulea, Sweden, June 10-13, 2012.

46-12 Bin Zhang and Dave Salee, Metal Flow and Heat Transfer in Billet DC Casting Using Wagstaff® Optifill™ Metal Distribution Systems, 5th International Metal Quality Workshop, United Arab Emirates Dubai, March 18-22, 2012.

45-12 D.R. Gunasegaram, M. Givord, R.G. O’Donnell and B.R. Finnin, Improvements engineered in UTS and elongation of aluminum alloy high pressure die castings through the alteration of runner geometry and plunger velocity, Materials Science & Engineering.

44-12 Antoni Drys and Stefano Mascetti, Aluminum Casting Simulations, Desktop Engineering, September 2012

42-12 Huizhen Duan, Jiangnan Shen and Yanping Li, Comparative analysis of HPDC process of an auto part with ProCAST and FLOW-3D, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 184-185 (2012) pp 90-94, Online available since 2012/Jun/14 at www.scientific.net, © (2012) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.184-185.90.

41-12 Deniece R. Korzekwa, Cameron M. Knapp, David A. Korzekwa, and John W. Gibbs, Co-Design – Fabrication of Unalloyed Plutonium, LA-UR-12-23441, MDI Summer Research Group Workshop Advanced Manufacturing, 2012-07-25/2012-07-26 (Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States)

29-12 Dario Tiberto and Ulrich E. Klotz, Computer simulation applied to jewellery casting: challenges, results and future possibilities, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.33 012008. Full paper available at IOP.

28-12 Y Yue and N R Green, Modelling of different entrainment mechanisms and their influences on the mechanical reliability of Al-Si castings, 2012 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 33,012072.Full paper available at IOP.

27-12 E Kaschnitz, Numerical simulation of centrifugal casting of pipes, 2012 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 33 012031, Issue 1. Full paper available at IOP.

15-12 C. Reilly, N.R Green, M.R. Jolly, The Present State Of Modeling Entrainment Defects In The Shape Casting Process, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Available online 27 April 2012, ISSN 0307-904X, 10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.032.

12-12 Andrei Starobin, Tony Hirt, Hubert Lang, and Matthias Todte, Core drying simulation and validation, International Foundry Research, GIESSEREIFORSCHUNG 64 (2012) No. 1, ISSN 0046-5933, pp 2-5

10-12 H. Vladimir Martínez and Marco F. Valencia (2012). Semisolid Processing of Al/β-SiC Composites by Mechanical Stirring Casting and High Pressure Die Casting, Recent Researches in Metallurgical Engineering – From Extraction to Forming, Dr Mohammad Nusheh (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0356-1, InTech

07-12 Amir H. G. Isfahani and James M. Brethour, Simulating Thermal Stresses and Cooling Deformations, Die Casting Engineer, March 2012

06-12 Shuisheng Xie, Youfeng He and Xujun Mi, Study on Semi-solid Magnesium Alloys Slurry Preparation and Continuous Roll-casting Process, Magnesium Alloys – Design, Processing and Properties, ISBN: 978-953-307-520-4, InTech.

04-12 J. Spangenberg, N. Roussel, J.H. Hattel, H. Stang, J. Skocek, M.R. Geiker, Flow induced particle migration in fresh concrete: Theoretical frame, numerical simulations and experimental results on model fluids, Cement and Concrete Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.01.007, February 2012.

01-12 Lee, B., Baek, U., and Han, J., Optimization of Gating System Design for Die Casting of Thin Magnesium Alloy-Based Multi-Cavity LCD Housings, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Springer New York, Issn: 1059-9495, 10.1007/s11665-011-0111-1, Volume 1 / 1992 – Volume 21 / 2012. Available online at Springer Link.

104-11 Fu-Yuan Hsu and Huey Jiuan Lin, Foam Filters Used in Gravity Casting, Metall and Materi Trans B (2011) 42: 1110. doi:10.1007/s11663-011-9548-8.

99-11 Eduardo Trejo, Centrifugal Casting of an Aluminium Alloy, thesis: Doctor of Philosophy, Metallurgy and Materials School of Engineering University of Birmingham, October 2011. Full paper available upon request.

93-11 Olga Kononova, Andrejs Krasnikovs ,Videvuds Lapsa,Jurijs Kalinka and Angelina Galushchak, Internal Structure Formation in High Strength Fiber Concrete during Casting, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 59 2011

76-11 J. Hartmann, A. Trepper, and C. Körner, Aluminum Integral Foams with Near-Microcellular Structure, Advanced Engineering Materials 2011, Volume 13 (2011) No. 11, © Wiley-VCH

71-11 Fu-Yuan Hsu and Yao-Ming Yang Confluence Weld in an Aluminum Gravity Casting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Available online 23 November 2011, ISSN 0924-0136, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.11.006.

65-11 V.A. Chaikin, A.V. Chaikin, I.N.Volnov, A Study of the Process of Late Modification Using Simulation, in Zagotovitelnye Proizvodstva v Mashinostroenii, 10, 2011, 8-12. In Russian.

54-11 Ngadia Taha Niane and Jean-Pierre Michalet, Validation of Foundry Process for Aluminum Parts with FLOW-3D Software, Proceedings of the 2011 International Symposium on Liquid Metal Processing and Casting, 2011.

51-11 A. Reikher and H. Gerber, Calculation of the Die Cast parameters of the Thin Wall Aluminum Cast Part, 2011 Die Casting Congress & Tabletop, Columbus, OH, September 19-21, 2011

50-11 Y. Wang, K. Kabiri-Bamoradian, and R.A. Miller, Runner design optimization based on CFD simulation for a die with multiple cavities, 2011 Die Casting Congress & Tabletop, Columbus, OH, September 19-21, 2011

48-11 A. Karwiński, W. Leśniewski, S. Pysz, P. Wieliczko, The technology of precision casting of titanium alloys by centrifugal process, Archives of Foundry Engineering, ISSN: 1897-3310), Volume 11, Issue 3/2011, 73-80, 2011.

46-11 Daniel Einsiedler, Entwicklung einer Simulationsmethodik zur Simulation von Strömungs- und Trocknungsvorgängen bei Kernfertigungsprozessen mittels CFD (Development of a simulation methodology for simulating flow and drying operations in core production processes using CFD), MSc thesis at Technical University of Aalen in Germany (Hochschule Aalen), 2011.

44-11 Bin Zhang and Craig Shaber, Aluminum Ingot Thermal Stress Development Modeling of the Wagstaff® EpsilonTM Rolling Ingot DC Casting System during the Start-up Phase, Materials Science Forum Vol. 693 (2011) pp 196-207, © 2011 Trans Tech Publications, July, 2011.

43-11 Vu Nguyen, Patrick Rohan, John Grandfield, Alex Levin, Kevin Naidoo, Kurt Oswald, Guillaume Girard, Ben Harker, and Joe Rea, Implementation of CASTfill low-dross pouring system for ingot casting, Materials Science Forum Vol. 693 (2011) pp 227-234, © 2011 Trans Tech Publications, July, 2011.

37-11 Ferencz Peti, Lucian Grama, Analyze of the Possible Causes of Porosity Type Defects in Aluminum High Pressure Diecast Parts, Scientific Bulletin of the Petru Maior University of Targu Mures, Vol. 8 (XXV) no. 1, 2011, ISSN 1841-9267

31-11 Johannes Hartmann, André Trepper, Carolin Körner, Aluminum Integral Foams with Near-Microcellular Structure, Advanced Engineering Materials, 13: n/a. doi: 10.1002/adem.201100035, June 2011.

27-11 A. Pari, Optimization of HPDC Process using Flow Simulation Case Studies, Die Casting Engineer, July 2011

26-11 A. Reikher, H. Gerber, Calculation of the Die Cast Parameters of the Thin Wall Aluminum Die Casting Part, Die Casting Engineer, July 2011

21-11 Thang Nguyen, Vu Nguyen, Morris Murray, Gary Savage, John Carrig, Modelling Die Filling in Ultra-Thin Aluminium Castings, Materials Science Forum (Volume 690), Light Metals Technology V, pp 107-111, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.690.107, June 2011.

19-11 Jon Spangenberg, Cem Celal Tutum, Jesper Henri Hattel, Nicolas Roussel, Metter Rica Geiker, Optimization of Casting Process Parameters for Homogeneous Aggregate Distribution in Self-Compacting Concrete: A Feasibility Study, © IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2011, New Orleans, USA

16-11 A. Starobin, C.W. Hirt, H. Lang, and M. Todte, Core Drying Simulation and Validations, AFS Proceedings 2011, © American Foundry Society, Presented at the 115th Metalcasting Congress, Schaumburg, Illinois, April 2011.

15-11 J. J. Hernández-Ortega, R. Zamora, J. López, and F. Faura, Numerical Analysis of Air Pressure Effects on the Flow Pattern during the Filling of a Vertical Die Cavity, AIP Conf. Proc., Volume 1353, pp. 1238-1243, The 14th International Esaform Conference on Material Forming: Esaform 2011; doi:10.1063/1.3589686, May 2011. Available online.

10-11 Abbas A. Khalaf and Sumanth Shankar, Favorable Environment for Nondentric Morphology in Controlled Diffusion Solidification, DOI: 10.1007/s11661-011-0641-z, © The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2011, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, March 11, 2011.

08-11 Hai Peng Li, Chun Yong Liang, Li Hui Wang, Hong Shui Wang, Numerical Simulation of Casting Process for Gray Iron Butterfly Valve, Advanced Materials Research, 189-193, 260, February 2011.

04-11 C.W. Hirt, Predicting Core Shooting, Drying and Defect Development, Foundry Management & Technology, January 2011.

76-10 Zhizhong Sun, Henry Hu, Alfred Yu, Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study of Squeeze Casting Magnesium Alloy AM50, Magnesium Technology 2010, 2010 TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition, February 14-18, 2010, Seattle, WA.

68-10 A. Reikher, H. Gerber, K.M. Pillai, T.-C. Jen, Natural Convection—An Overlooked Phenomenon of the Solidification Process, Die Casting Engineer, January 2010

54-10 Andrea Bernardoni, Andrea Borsi, Stefano Mascetti, Alessandro Incognito and Matteo Corrado, Fonderia Leonardo aveva ragione! L’enorme cavallo dedicato a Francesco Sforza era materialmente realizzabile, A&C – Analisis e Calcolo, Giugno 2010. In Italian.

48-10 J. J. Hernández-Ortega, R. Zamora, J. Palacios, J. López and F. Faura, An Experimental and Numerical Study of Flow Patterns and Air Entrapment Phenomena During the Filling of a Vertical Die Cavity, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., October 2010, Volume 132, Issue 5, 05101, doi:10.1115/1.4002535.

47-10 A.V. Chaikin, I.N. Volnov, and V.A. Chaikin, Development of Dispersible Mixed Inoculant Compositions Using the FLOW-3D Program, Liteinoe Proizvodstvo, October, 2010, in Russian.

42-10 H. Lakshmi, M.C. Vinay Kumar, Raghunath, P. Kumar, V. Ramanarayanan, K.S.S. Murthy, P. Dutta, Induction reheating of A356.2 aluminum alloy and thixocasting as automobile component, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 20(20101) s961-s967.

41-10 Pamela J. Waterman, Understanding Core-Gas Defects, Desktop Engineering, October 2010. Available online at Desktop Engineering. Also published in the Foundry Trade Journal, November 2010.

39-10 Liu Zheng, Jia Yingying, Mao Pingli, Li Yang, Wang Feng, Wang Hong, Zhou Le, Visualization of Die Casting Magnesium Alloy Steering Bracket, Special Casting & Nonferrous Alloys, ISSN: 1001-2249, CN: 42-1148/TG, 2010-04. In Chinese.

37-10 Morris Murray, Lars Feldager Hansen, and Carl Reinhardt, I Have Defects – Now What, Die Casting Engineer, September 2010

36-10 Stefano Mascetti, Using Flow Analysis Software to Optimize Piston Velocity for an HPDC Process, Die Casting Engineer, September 2010. Also available in Italian: Ottimizzare la velocita del pistone in pressofusione. A & C, Analisi e Calcolo, Anno XII, n. 42, Gennaio 2011, ISSN 1128-3874.

32-10 Guan Hai Yan, Sheng Dun Zhao, Zheng Hui Sha, Parameters Optimization of Semisolid Diecasting Process for Air-Conditioner’s Triple Valve in HPb59-1 Alloy, Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 129 – 131), Vol. Material and Manufacturing Technology, pp. 936-941, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.129-131.936, August 2010.

29-10 Zheng Peng, Xu Jun, Zhang Zhifeng, Bai Yuelong, and Shi Likai, Numerical Simulation of Filling of Rheo-diecasting A357 Aluminum Alloy, Special Casting & Nonferrous Alloys, DOI: CNKI:SUN:TZZZ.0.2010-01-024, 2010.

27-10 For an Aerospace Diecasting, Littler Uses Simulation to Reveal Defects, and Win a New Order, Foundry Management & Technology, July 2010

23-10 Michael R. Barkhudarov, Minimizing Air Entrainment, The Canadian Die Caster, June 2010

15-10 David H. Kirkwood, Michel Suery, Plato Kapranos, Helen V. Atkinson, and Kenneth P. Young, Semi-solid Processing of Alloys, 2010, XII, 172 p. 103 illus., 19 in color., Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-642-00705-7.

09-10 Shannon Wetzel, Fullfilling Da Vinci’s Dream, Modern Casting, April 2010.

08-10 B.I. Semenov, K.M. Kushtarov, Semi-solid Manufacturing of Castings, New Industrial Technologies, Publication of Moscow State Technical University n.a. N.E. Bauman, 2009 (in Russian)

07-10 Carl Reilly, Development Of Quantitative Casting Quality Assessment Criteria Using Process Modelling, thesis: The University of Birmingham, March 2010 (Available upon request)

06-10 A. Pari, Optimization of HPDC Process using Flow Simulation – Case Studies, CastExpo ’10, NADCA, Orlando, Florida, March 2010

05-10 M.C. Carter, S. Palit, and M. Littler, Characterizing Flow Losses Occurring in Air Vents and Ejector Pins in High Pressure Die Castings, CastExpo ’10, NADCA, Orlando, Florida, March 2010

04-10 Pamela Waterman, Simulating Porosity Factors, Foundry Management Technology, March 2010, Article available at Foundry Management Technology

03-10 C. Reilly, M.R. Jolly, N.R. Green, JC Gebelin, Assessment of Casting Filling by Modeling Surface Entrainment Events Using CFD, 2010 TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition (Jim Evans Honorary Symposium), Seattle, Washington, USA, February 14-18, 2010

02-10 P. Väyrynen, S. Wang, J. Laine and S.Louhenkilpi, Control of Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer and Inclusions in Continuous Casting – CFD and Neural Network Studies, 2010 TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition (Jim Evans Honorary Symposium), Seattle, Washington, USA, February 14-18, 2010

60-09 Somlak Wannarumon, and Marco Actis Grande, Comparisons of Computer Fluid Dynamic Software Programs applied to Jewelry Investment Casting Process, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 55 2009.

59-09 Marco Actis Grande and Somlak Wannarumon, Numerical Simulation of Investment Casting of Gold Jewelry: Experiments and Validations, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol:3 2009-07-24

56-09 Jozef Kasala, Ondrej Híreš, Rudolf Pernis, Start-up Phase Modeling of Semi Continuous Casting Process of Brass Billets, Metal 2009, 19.-21.5.2009

51-09 In-Ting Hong, Huan-Chien Tung, Chun-Hao Chiu and Hung-Shang Huang, Effect of Casting Parameters on Microstructure and Casting Quality of Si-Al Alloy for Vacuum Sputtering, China Steel Technical Report, No. 22, pp. 33-40, 2009.

42-09 P. Väyrynen, S. Wang, S. Louhenkilpi and L. Holappa, Modeling and Removal of Inclusions in Continuous Casting, Materials Science & Technology 2009 Conference & Exhibition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, October 25-29, 2009

41-09 O.Smirnov, P.Väyrynen, A.Kravchenko and S.Louhenkilpi, Modern Methods of Modeling Fluid Flow and Inclusions Motion in Tundish Bath – General View, Proceedings of Steelsim 2009 – 3rd International Conference on Simulation and Modelling of Metallurgical Processes in Steelmaking, Leoben, Austria, September 8-10, 2009

21-09 A. Pari, Case Studies – Optimization of HPDC Process Using Flow Simulation, Die Casting Engineer, July 2009

20-09 M. Sirvio, M. Wos, Casting directly from a computer model by using advanced simulation software, FLOW-3D Cast, Archives of Foundry Engineering Volume 9, Issue 1/2009, 79-82

19-09 Andrei Starobin, C.W. Hirt, D. Goettsch, A Model for Binder Gas Generation and Transport in Sand Cores and Molds, Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Solidification Processes XII, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Minerals Society), June 2009

11-09 Michael Barkhudarov, Minimizing Air Entrainment in a Shot Sleeve during Slow-Shot Stage, Die Casting Engineer (The North American Die Casting Association ISSN 0012-253X), May 2009

10-09 A. Reikher, H. Gerber, Application of One-Dimensional Numerical Simulation to Optimize Process Parameters of a Thin-Wall Casting in High Pressure Die Casting, Die Casting Engineer (The North American Die Casting Association ISSN 0012-253X), May 2009

7-09 Andrei Starobin, Simulation of Core Gas Evolution and Flow, presented at the North American Die Casting Association – 113th Metalcasting Congress, April 7-10, 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

6-09 A.Pari, Optimization of HPDC PROCESS: Case Studies, North American Die Casting Association – 113th Metalcasting Congress, April 7-10, 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

2-09 C. Reilly, N.R. Green and M.R. Jolly, Oxide Entrainment Structures in Horizontal Running Systems, TMS 2009, San Francisco, California, February 2009

28-08 A.V.Chaikin, I.N.Volnov, V.A.Chaikin, Y.A.Ukhanov, N.R.Petrov, Analysis of the Efficiency of Alloy Modifiers Using Statistics and Modeling, © 2008, Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), October, 2008

27-08 P. Scarber, Jr., H. Littleton, Simulating Macro-Porosity in Aluminum Lost Foam Castings, American Foundry Society, © 2008, AFS Lost Foam Conference, Asheville, North Carolina, October, 2008

22-08 Mark Littler, Simulation Eliminates Die Casting Scrap, Modern Casting/September 2008

21-08 X. Chen, D. Penumadu, Permeability Measurement and Numerical Modeling for Refractory Porous Materials, AFS Transactions © 2008 American Foundry Society, CastExpo ’08, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2008

20-08 Rolf Krack, Using Solidification Simulations for Optimising Die Cooling Systems, FTJ July/August 2008

19-08 Mark Littler, Simulation Software Eliminates Die Casting Scrap, ECS Casting Innovations, July/August 2008

13-08 T. Yoshimura, K. Yano, T. Fukui, S. Yamamoto, S. Nishido, M. Watanabe and Y. Nemoto, Optimum Design of Die Casting Plunger Tip Considering Air Entrainment, Proceedings of 10th Asian Foundry Congress (AFC10), Nagoya, Japan, May 2008

08-08 Stephen Instone, Andreas Buchholz and Gerd-Ulrich Gruen, Inclusion Transport Phenomena in Casting Furnaces, Light Metals 2008, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), 2008

07-08 P. Scarber, Jr., H. Littleton, Simulating Macro-Porosity in Aluminum Lost Foam Casting, AFS Transactions 2008 © American Foundry Society, CastExpo ’08, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2008

06-08 A. Reikher, H. Gerber and A. Starobin, Multi-Stage Plunger Deceleration System, CastExpo ’08, NADCA, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2008

05-08 Amol Palekar, Andrei Starobin, Alexander Reikher, Die-casting end-of-fill and drop forge viscometer flow transients examined with a coupled-motion numerical model, 68th World Foundry Congress, Chennai, India, February 2008

03-08 Petri J. Väyrynen, Sami K. Vapalahti and Seppo J. Louhenkilpi, On Validation of Mathematical Fluid Flow Models for Simulation of Tundish Water Models and Industrial Examples, AISTech 2008, May 2008

53-07 A. Kermanpur, Sh. Mahmoudi and A. Hajipour, Three-dimensional Numerical Simulation of Metal Flow and Solidification in the Multi-cavity Casting Moulds of Automotive Components, International Journal of Iron & Steel Society of Iran, Article 2, Volume 4, Issue 1, Summer and Autumn 2007, pages 8-15.

36-07 Duque Mesa A. F., Herrera J., Cruz L.J., Fernández G.P. y Martínez H.V., Caracterización Defectológica de Piezas Fundida por Lost Foam Casting Mediante Simulación Numérica, 8° Congreso Iberoamericano de Ingenieria Mecanica, Cusco, Peru, 23 al 25 de Octubre de 2007 (in Spanish)

27-07 A.Y. Korotchenko, A.M. Zarubin, I.A.Korotchenko, Modeling of High Pressure Die Casting Filling, Russian Foundryman, December 2007, pp 15-19. (in Russian)

26-07 I.N. Volnov, Modeling of Casting Processes with Variable Geometry, Russian Foundryman, November 2007, pp 27-30. (in Russian)

16-07 P. Väyrynen, S. Vapalahti, S. Louhenkilpi, L. Chatburn, M. Clark, T. Wagner, Tundish Flow Model Tuning and Validation – Steady State and Transient Casting Situations, STEELSIM 2007, Graz/Seggau, Austria, September 12-14 2007

11-07 Marco Actis Grande, Computer Simulation of the Investment Casting Process – Widening of the Filling Step, Santa Fe Symposium on Jewelry Manufacturing Technology, May 2007

09-07 Alexandre Reikher and Michael Barkhudarov, Casting: An Analytical Approach, Springer, 1st edition, August 2007, Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-84628-849-4. U.S. Order Form; Europe Order Form.

07-07 I.N. Volnov, Casting Modeling Systems – Current State, Problems and Perspectives, (in Russian), Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), June 2007

05-07 A.N. Turchin, D.G. Eskin, and L. Katgerman, Solidification under Forced-Flow Conditions in a Shallow Cavity, DOI: 10.1007/s1161-007-9183-9, © The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2007

04-07 A.N. Turchin, M. Zuijderwijk, J. Pool, D.G. Eskin, and L. Katgerman, Feathery grain growth during solidification under forced flow conditions, © Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.030, April 2007

03-07 S. Kuyucak, Sponsored Research – Clean Steel Casting Production—Evaluation of Laboratory Castings, Transactions of the American Foundry Society, Volume 115, 111th Metalcasting Congress, May 2007

02-07 Fu-Yuan Hsu, Mark R. Jolly and John Campbell, The Design of L-Shaped Runners for Gravity Casting, Shape Casting: 2nd International Symposium, Edited by Paul N. Crepeau, Murat Tiryakioðlu and John Campbell, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), Orlando, FL, Feb 2007

30-06 X.J. Liu, S.H. Bhavnani, R.A. Overfelt, Simulation of EPS foam decomposition in the lost foam casting process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 182 (2007) 333–342, © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

25-06 Michael Barkhudarov and Gengsheng Wei, Modeling Casting on the Move, Modern Casting, August 2006; Modeling of Casting Processes with Variable Geometry, Russian Foundryman, December 2007, pp 10-15. (in Russian)

7-06 M.Y.Smirnov, Y.V.Golenkov, Manufacturing of Cast Iron Bath Tubs Castings using Vacuum-Process in Russia, Russia’s Foundryman, July 2006. In Russian.

6-06 M. Barkhudarov, and G. Wei, Modeling of the Coupled Motion of Rigid Bodies in Liquid Metal, Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes – XI, May 28 – June 2, 2006, Opio, France, eds. Ch.-A. Gandin and M. Bellet, pp 71-78, 2006.

2-06 J.-C. Gebelin, M.R. Jolly and F.-Y. Hsu, ‘Designing-in’ Controlled Filling Using Numerical Simulation for Gravity Sand Casting of Aluminium Alloys, Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 2006, Vol.19 No.1

1-06 Michael Barkhudarov, Using Simulation to Control Microporosity Reduces Die Iterations, Die Casting Engineer, January 2006, pp. 52-54

30-05 H. Xue, K. Kabiri-Bamoradian, R.A. Miller, Modeling Dynamic Cavity Pressure and Impact Spike in Die Casting, Cast Expo ’05, April 16-19, 2005

22-05 Blas Melissari & Stavros A. Argyropoulous, Measurement of Magnitude and Direction of Velocity in High-Temperature Liquid Metals; Part I, Mathematical Modeling, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Volume 36B, October 2005, pp. 691-700

21-05 M.R. Jolly, State of the Art Review of Use of Modeling Software for Casting, TMS Annual Meeting, Shape Casting: The John Campbell Symposium, Eds, M. Tiryakioglu & P.N Crepeau, TMS, Warrendale, PA, ISBN 0-87339-583-2, Feb 2005, pp 337-346

20-05 J-C Gebelin, M.R. Jolly & F-Y Hsu, ‘Designing-in’ Controlled Filling Using Numerical Simulation for Gravity Sand Casting of Aluminium Alloys, TMS Annual Meeting, Shape Casting: The John Campbell Symposium, Eds, M. Tiryakioglu & P.N Crepeau, TMS, Warrendale, PA, ISBN 0-87339-583-2, Feb 2005, pp 355-364

19-05 F-Y Hsu, M.R. Jolly & J Campbell, Vortex Gate Design for Gravity Castings, TMS Annual Meeting, Shape Casting: The John Campbell Symposium, Eds, M. Tiryakioglu & P.N Crepeau, TMS, Warrendale, PA, ISBN 0-87339-583-2, Feb 2005, pp 73-82

18-05 M.R. Jolly, Modelling the Investment Casting Process: Problems and Successes, Japanese Foundry Society, JFS, Tokyo, Sept. 2005

13-05 Xiaogang Yang, Xiaobing Huang, Xiaojun Dai, John Campbell and Joe Tatler, Numerical Modelling of the Entrainment of Oxide Film Defects in Filling of Aluminium Alloy Castings, International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 17 (6), 2004, 321-331

10-05 Carlos Evaristo Esparza, Martha P. Guerro-Mata, Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado, Optimal Design of Gating Systems by Gradient Search Methods, Computational Materials Science, October 2005

6-05 Birgit Hummler-Schaufler, Fritz Hirning, Jurgen Schaufler, A World First for Hatz Diesel and Schaufler Tooling, Die Casting Engineer, May 2005, pp. 18-21

4-05 Rolf Krack, The W35 Topic—A World First, Die Casting World, March 2005, pp. 16-17

3-05 Joerg Frei, Casting Simulations Speed Up Development, Die Casting World, March 2005, p. 14

2-05 David Goettsch and Michael Barkhudarov, Analysis and Optimization of the Transient Stage of Stopper-Rod Pour, Shape Casting: The John Campbell Symposium, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2005

36-04 Ik Min Park, Il Dong Choi, Yong Ho Park, Development of Light-Weight Al Scroll Compressor for Car Air Conditioner, Materials Science Forum, Designing, Processing and Properties of Advanced Engineering Materials, 449-452, 149, March 2004.

32-04 D.H. Kirkwood and P.J Ward, Numerical Modelling of Semi-Solid Flow under Processing Conditions, steel research int. 75 (2004), No. 8/9

30-04 Haijing Mao, A Numerical Study of Externally Solidified Products in the Cold Chamber Die Casting Process, thesis: The Ohio State University, 2004 (Available upon request)

28-04 Z. Cao, Z. Yang, and X.L. Chen, Three-Dimensional Simulation of Transient GMA Weld Pool with Free Surface, Supplement to the Welding Journal, June 2004.

23-04 State of the Art Use of Computational Modelling in the Foundry Industry, 3rd International Conference Computational Modelling of Materials III, Sicily, Italy, June 2004, Advances in Science and Technology, Eds P. Vincenzini & A Lami, Techna Group Srl, Italy, ISBN: 88-86538-46-4, Part B, pp 479-490

22-04 Jerry Fireman, Computer Simulation Helps Reduce Scrap, Die Casting Engineer, May 2004, pp. 46-49

21-04 Joerg Frei, Simulation—A Safe and Quick Way to Good Components, Aluminium World, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 42-43

20-04 J.-C. Gebelin, M.R. Jolly, A. M. Cendrowicz, J. Cirre and S. Blackburn, Simulation of Die Filling for the Wax Injection Process – Part II Numerical Simulation, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, Volume 35B, August 2004

14-04 Sayavur I. Bakhtiyarov, Charles H. Sherwin, and Ruel A. Overfelt, Hot Distortion Studies In Phenolic Urethane Cold Box System, American Foundry Society, 108th Casting Congress, June 12-15, 2004, Rosemont, IL, USA

13-04 Sayavur I. Bakhtiyarov and Ruel A. Overfelt, First V-Process Casting of Magnesium, American Foundry Society, 108th Casting Congress, June 12-15, 2004, Rosemont, IL, USA

5-04 C. Schlumpberger & B. Hummler-Schaufler, Produktentwicklung auf hohem Niveau (Product Development on a High Level), Druckguss Praxis, January 2004, pp 39-42 (in German).

3-04 Charles Bates, Dealing with Defects, Foundry Management and Technology, February 2004, pp 23-25

1-04 Laihua Wang, Thang Nguyen, Gary Savage and Cameron Davidson, Thermal and Flow Modeling of Ladling and Injection in High Pressure Die Casting Process, International Journal of Cast Metals Research, vol. 16 No 4 2003, pp 409-417

2-03 J-C Gebelin, AM Cendrowicz, MR Jolly, Modeling of the Wax Injection Process for the Investment Casting Process – Prediction of Defects, presented at the Third International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Minerals and Process Industries, December 10-12, 2003, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 415-420

29-03 C. W. Hirt, Modeling Shrinkage Induced Micro-porosity, Flow Science Technical Note (FSI-03-TN66)

28-03 Thixoforming at the University of Sheffield, Diecasting World, September 2003, pp 11-12

26-03 William Walkington, Gas Porosity-A Guide to Correcting the Problems, NADCA Publication: 516

22-03 G F Yao, C W Hirt, and M Barkhudarov, Development of a Numerical Approach for Simulation of Sand Blowing and Core Formation, in Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Process-X”, Ed. By Stefanescu et al pp. 633-639, 2003

21-03 E F Brush Jr, S P Midson, W G Walkington, D T Peters, J G Cowie, Porosity Control in Copper Rotor Die Castings, NADCA Indianapolis Convention Center, Indianapolis, IN September 15-18, 2003, T03-046

12-03 J-C Gebelin & M.R. Jolly, Modeling Filters in Light Alloy Casting Processes, Trans AFS, 2002, 110, pp. 109-120

11-03 M.R. Jolly, Casting Simulation – How Well Do Reality and Virtual Casting Match – A State of the Art Review, Intl. J. Cast Metals Research, 2002, 14, pp. 303-313

10-03 Gebelin., J-C and Jolly, M.R., Modeling of the Investment Casting Process, Journal of Materials Processing Tech., Vol. 135/2-3, pp. 291 – 300

9-03 Cox, M, Harding, R.A. and Campbell, J., Optimised Running System Design for Bottom Filled Aluminium Alloy 2L99 Investment Castings, J. Mat. Sci. Tech., May 2003, Vol. 19, pp. 613-625

8-03 Von Alexander Schrey and Regina Reek, Numerische Simulation der Kernherstellung, (Numerical Simulation of Core Blowing), Giesserei, June 2003, pp. 64-68 (in German)

7-03 J. Zuidema Jr., L Katgerman, Cyclone separation of particles in aluminum DC Casting, Proceedings from the Tenth International Conference on Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, Destin, FL, May 2003, pp. 607-614

6-03 Jean-Christophe Gebelin and Mark Jolly, Numerical Modeling of Metal Flow Through Filters, Proceedings from the Tenth International Conference on Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, Destin, FL, May 2003, pp. 431-438

5-03 N.W. Lai, W.D. Griffiths and J. Campbell, Modelling of the Potential for Oxide Film Entrainment in Light Metal Alloy Castings, Proceedings from the Tenth International Conference on Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, Destin, FL, May 2003, pp. 415-422

21-02 Boris Lukezic, Case History: Process Modeling Solves Die Design Problems, Modern Casting, February 2003, P 59

20-02 C.W. Hirt and M.R. Barkhudarov, Predicting Defects in Lost Foam Castings, Modern Casting, December 2002, pp 31-33

19-02 Mark Jolly, Mike Cox, Ric Harding, Bill Griffiths and John Campbell, Quiescent Filling Applied to Investment Castings, Modern Casting, December 2002 pp. 36-38

18-02 Simulation Helps Overcome Challenges of Thin Wall Magnesium Diecasting, Foundry Management and Technology, October 2002, pp 13-15

17-02 G Messmer, Simulation of a Thixoforging Process of Aluminum Alloys with FLOW-3D, Institute for Metal Forming Technology, University of Stuttgart

16-02 Barkhudarov, Michael, Computer Simulation of Lost Foam Process, Casting Simulation Background and Examples from Europe and the USA, World Foundrymen Organization, 2002, pp 319-324

15-02 Barkhudarov, Michael, Computer Simulation of Inclusion Tracking, Casting Simulation Background and Examples from Europe and the USA, World Foundrymen Organization, 2002, pp 341-346

14-02 Barkhudarov, Michael, Advanced Simulation of the Flow and Heat Transfer of an Alternator Housing, Casting Simulation Background and Examples from Europe and the USA, World Foundrymen Organization, 2002, pp 219-228

8-02 Sayavur I. Bakhtiyarov, and Ruel A. Overfelt, Experimental and Numerical Study of Bonded Sand-Air Two-Phase Flow in PUA Process, Auburn University, 2002 American Foundry Society, AFS Transactions 02-091, Kansas City, MO

7-02 A Habibollah Zadeh, and J Campbell, Metal Flow Through a Filter System, University of Birmingham, 2002 American Foundry Society, AFS Transactions 02-020, Kansas City, MO

6-02 Phil Ward, and Helen Atkinson, Final Report for EPSRC Project: Modeling of Thixotropic Flow of Metal Alloys into a Die, GR/M17334/01, March 2002, University of Sheffield

5-02 S. I. Bakhtiyarov and R. A. Overfelt, Numerical and Experimental Study of Aluminum Casting in Vacuum-sealed Step Molding, Auburn University, 2002 American Foundry Society, AFS Transactions 02-050, Kansas City, MO

4-02 J. C. Gebelin and M. R. Jolly, Modelling Filters in Light Alloy Casting Processes, University of Birmingham, 2002 American Foundry Society AFS Transactions 02-079, Kansas City, MO

3-02 Mark Jolly, Mike Cox, Jean-Christophe Gebelin, Sam Jones, and Alex Cendrowicz, Fundamentals of Investment Casting (FOCAST), Modelling the Investment Casting Process, Some preliminary results from the UK Research Programme, IRC in Materials, University of Birmingham, UK, AFS2001

49-01 Hua Bai and Brian G. Thomas, Bubble formation during horizontal gas injection into downward-flowing liquid, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1143-1159, 2001. doi.org/10.1007/s11663-001-0102-y

45-01 Jan Zuidema; Laurens Katgerman; Ivo J. Opstelten;Jan M. Rabenberg, Secondary Cooling in DC Casting: Modelling and Experimental Results, TMS 2001, New Orleans, Louisianna, February 11-15, 2001

43-01 James Andrew Yurko, Fluid Flow Behavior of Semi-Solid Aluminum at High Shear Rates,Ph.D. thesis; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2001. Abstract only; full thesis available at http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8451 (for a fee).

33-01 Juang, S.H., CAE Application on Design of Die Casting Dies, 2001 Conference on CAE Technology and Application, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, November 2001, (article in Chinese with English-language abstract)

32-01 Juang, S.H. and C. M. Wang, Effect of Feeding Geometry on Flow Characteristics of Magnesium Die Casting by Numerical Analysis, The Preceedings of 6th FADMA Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, July 2001, Chinese language with English abstract

26-01 C. W. Hirt., Predicting Defects in Lost Foam Castings, December 13, 2001

21-01 P. Scarber Jr., Using Liquid Free Surface Areas as a Predictor of Reoxidation Tendency in Metal Alloy Castings, presented at the Steel Founders’ Society of American, Technical and Operating Conference, October 2001

20-01 P. Scarber Jr., J. Griffin, and C. E. Bates, The Effect of Gating and Pouring Practice on Reoxidation of Steel Castings, presented at the Steel Founders’ Society of American, Technical and Operating Conference, October 2001

19-01 L. Wang, T. Nguyen, M. Murray, Simulation of Flow Pattern and Temperature Profile in the Shot Sleeve of a High Pressure Die Casting Process, CSIRO Manufacturing Science and Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Presented by North American Die Casting Association, Oct 29-Nov 1, 2001, Cincinnati, To1-014

18-01 Rajiv Shivpuri, Venkatesh Sankararaman, Kaustubh Kulkarni, An Approach at Optimizing the Ingate Design for Reducing Filling and Shrinkage Defects, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, Presented by North American Die Casting Association, Oct 29-Nov 1, 2001, Cincinnati, TO1-052

5-01 Michael Barkhudarov, Simulation Helps Overcome Challenges of Thin Wall Magnesium Diecasting, Diecasting World, March 2001, pp. 5-6

2-01 J. Grindling, Customized CFD Codes to Simulate Casting of Thermosets in Full 3D, Electrical Manufacturing and Coil Winding 2000 Conference, October 31-November 2, 20

20-00 Richard Schuhmann, John Carrig, Thang Nguyen, Arne Dahle, Comparison of Water Analogue Modelling and Numerical Simulation Using Real-Time X-Ray Flow Data in Gravity Die Casting, Australian Die Casting Association Die Casting 2000 Conference, September 3-6, 2000, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

15-00 M. Sirvio, Vainola, J. Vartianinen, M. Vuorinen, J. Orkas, and S. Devenyi, Fluid Flow Analysis for Designing Gating of Aluminum Castings, Proc. NADCA Conf., Rosemont, IL, Nov 6-8, 1999

14-00 X. Yang, M. Jolly, and J. Campbell, Reduction of Surface Turbulence during Filling of Sand Castings Using a Vortex-flow Runner, Conference for Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes IX, Aachen, Germany, August 2000

13-00 H. S. H. Lo and J. Campbell, The Modeling of Ceramic Foam Filters, Conference for Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes IX, Aachen, Germany, August 2000

12-00 M. R. Jolly, H. S. H. Lo, M. Turan and J. Campbell, Use of Simulation Tools in the Practical Development of a Method for Manufacture of Cast Iron Camshafts,” Conference for Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes IX, Aachen, Germany, August, 2000

14-99 J Koke, and M Modigell, Time-Dependent Rheological Properties of Semi-solid Metal Alloys, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Aachen University of Technology, Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials 3: 15-30, 1999

12-99 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich, Schneider, Wolfgang, Ray, Steven, Marthinusen, Jan-Olaf, Recent Improvements in Ceramic Foam Filter Design by Coupled Heat and Fluid Flow Modeling, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1999, pp. 1041-1047

10-99 Bongcheol Park and Jerald R. Brevick, Computer Flow Modeling of Cavity Pre-fill Effects in High Pressure Die Casting, NADCA Proceedings, Cleveland T99-011, November, 1999

8-99 Brad Guthrie, Simulation Reduces Aluminum Die Casting Cost by Reducing Volume, Die Casting Engineer Magazine, September/October 1999, pp. 78-81

7-99 Fred L. Church, Virtual Reality Predicts Cast Metal Flow, Modern Metals, September, 1999, pp. 67F-J

19-98 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich, & Schneider, Wolfgang, Numerical Modeling of Fluid Flow Phenomena in the Launder-integrated Tool Within Casting Unit Development, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1998, pp. 1175-1182

18-98 X. Yang & J. Campbell, Liquid Metal Flow in a Pouring Basin, Int. J. Cast Metals Res, 1998, 10, pp. 239-253

15-98 R. Van Tol, Mould Filling of Horizontal Thin-Wall Castings, Delft University Press, The Netherlands, 1998

14-98 J. Daughtery and K. A. Williams, Thermal Modeling of Mold Material Candidates for Copper Pressure Die Casting of the Induction Motor Rotor Structure, Proc. Int’l Workshop on Permanent Mold Casting of Copper-Based Alloys, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Oct. 15-16, 1998

10-98 C. W. Hirt, and M.R. Barkhudarov, Lost Foam Casting Simulation with Defect Prediction, Flow Science Inc, presented at Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes VIII Conference, June 7-12, 1998, Catamaran Hotel, San Diego, California

9-98 M. R. Barkhudarov and C. W. Hirt, Tracking Defects, Flow Science Inc, presented at the 1st International Aluminum Casting Technology Symposium, 12-14 October 1998, Rosemont, IL

5-98 J. Righi, Computer Simulation Helps Eliminate Porosity, Die Casting Management Magazine, pp. 36-38, January 1998

3-98 P. Kapranos, M. R. Barkhudarov, D. H. Kirkwood, Modeling of Structural Breakdown during Rapid Compression of Semi-Solid Alloy Slugs, Dept. Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, U.K. and Flow Science Inc, USA, Presented at the 5th International Conference Semi-Solid Processing of Alloys and Composites, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 23-25 June 1998

1-98 U. Jerichow, T. Altan, and P. R. Sahm, Semi Solid Metal Forming of Aluminum Alloys-The Effect of Process Variables Upon Material Flow, Cavity Fill and Mechanical Properties, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, published in Die Casting Engineer, p. 26, Jan/Feb 1998

8-97 Michael Barkhudarov, High Pressure Die Casting Simulation Using FLOW-3D, Die Casting Engineer, 1997

15-97 M. R. Barkhudarov, Advanced Simulation of the Flow and Heat Transfer Process in Simultaneous Engineering, Flow Science report, presented at the Casting 1997 – International ADI and Simulation Conference, Helsinki, Finland, May 28-30, 1997

14-97 M. Ranganathan and R. Shivpuri, Reducing Scrap and Increasing Die Life in Low Pressure Die Casting through Flow Simulation and Accelerated Testing, Dept. Welding and Systems Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, presented at 19th International Die Casting Congress & Exposition, November 3-6, 1997

13-97 J. Koke, Modellierung und Simulation der Fließeigenschaften teilerstarrter Metallegierungen, Livt Information, Institut für Verfahrenstechnik, RWTH Aachen, October 1997

10-97 J. P. Greene and J. O. Wilkes, Numerical Analysis of Injection Molding of Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics – Part 2 Fiber Orientation, Body-in-White Center, General Motors Corp. and Dept. Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 37, No. 6, June 1997

9-97 J. P. Greene and J. O. Wilkes, Numerical Analysis of Injection Molding of Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics. Part 1 – Injection Pressures and Flow, Manufacturing Center, General Motors Corp. and Dept. Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, March 1997

8-97 H. Grazzini and D. Nesa, Thermophysical Properties, Casting Simulation and Experiments for a Stainless Steel, AT Systemes (Renault) report, presented at the Solidification Processing ’97 Conference, July 7-10, 1997, Sheffield, U.K.

7-97 R. Van Tol, L. Katgerman and H. E. A. Van den Akker, Horizontal Mould Filling of a Thin Wall Aluminum Casting, Laboratory of Materials report, Delft University, presented at the Solidification Processing ’97 Conference, July 7-10, 1997, Sheffield, U.K.

6-97 M. R. Barkhudarov, Is Fluid Flow Important for Predicting Solidification, Flow Science report, presented at the Solidification Processing ’97 Conference, July 7-10, 1997, Sheffield, U.K.

22-96 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich & Schneider, Wolfgang, 3-D Modeling of the Start-up Phase of DC Casting of Sheet Ingots, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1996, pp. 971-981

9-96 M. R. Barkhudarov and C. W. Hirt, Thixotropic Flow Effects under Conditions of Strong Shear, Flow Science report FSI96-00-2, to be presented at the “Materials Week ’96” TMS Conference, Cincinnati, OH, 7-10 October 1996

4-96 C. W. Hirt, A Computational Model for the Lost Foam Process, Flow Science final report, February 1996 (FSI-96-57-R2)

3-96 M. R. Barkhudarov, C. L. Bronisz, C. W. Hirt, Three-Dimensional Thixotropic Flow Model, Flow Science report, FSI-96-00-1, published in the proceedings of (pp. 110- 114) and presented at the 4th International Conference on Semi-Solid Processing of Alloys and Composites, The University of Sheffield, 19-21 June 1996

1-96 M. R. Barkhudarov, J. Beech, K. Chang, and S. B. Chin, Numerical Simulation of Metal/Mould Interfacial Heat Transfer in Casting, Dept. Mech. & Process Engineering, Dept. Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield and Flow Science Inc, 9th Int. Symposium on Transport Phenomena in Thermal-Fluid Engineering, June 25-28, 1996, Singapore

11-95 Barkhudarov, M. R., Hirt, C.W., Casting Simulation Mold Filling and Solidification-Benchmark Calculations Using FLOW-3D, Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes VII, pp 935-946

10-95 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich, & Schneider, Wolfgang, Optimal Design of a Distribution Pan for Level Pour Casting, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1995, pp. 1061-1070

9-95 E. Masuda, I. Itoh, K. Haraguchi, Application of Mold Filling Simulation to Die Casting Processes, Honda Engineering Co., Ltd., Tochigi, Japan, presented at the Modelling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes VII, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1995

6-95 K. Venkatesan, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Process Parameters on the Erosive Wear of Die Casting Dies, presented for Ph.D. degree at Ohio State University, 1995

5-95 J. Righi, A. F. LaCamera, S. A. Jones, W. G. Truckner, T. N. Rouns, Integration of Experience and Simulation Based Understanding in the Die Design Process, Alcoa Technical Center, Alcoa Center, PA 15069, presented by the North American Die Casting Association, 1995

2-95 K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Simulation and Comparison with Water Modeling Studies of the Inertia Dominated Cavity Filling in Die Casting, NUMIFORM, 1995

1-95 K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Gate Velocity and Gate Size on the Quality of Die Casting Parts, NAMRC, 1995.

15-94 D. Liang, Y. Bayraktar, S. A. Moir, M. Barkhudarov, and H. Jones, Primary Silicon Segregation During Isothermal Holding of Hypereutectic AI-18.3%Si Alloy in the Freezing Range, Dept. of Engr. Materials, U. of Sheffield, Metals and Materials, February 1994

13-94 Deniece Korzekwa and Paul Dunn, A Combined Experimental and Modeling Approach to Uranium Casting, Materials Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, presented at the Symposium on Liquid Metal Processing and Casting, El Dorado Hotel, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1994

12-94 R. van Tol, H. E. A. van den Akker and L. Katgerman, CFD Study of the Mould Filling of a Horizontal Thin Wall Aluminum Casting, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, HTD-Vol. 284/AMD-Vol. 182, Transport Phenomena in Solidification, ASME 1994

11-94 M. R. Barkhudarov and K. A. Williams, Simulation of ‘Surface Turbulence’ Fluid Phenomena During the Mold Filling Phase of Gravity Castings, Flow Science Technical Note #41, November 1994 (FSI-94-TN41)

10-94 M. R. Barkhudarov and S. B. Chin, Stability of a Numerical Algorithm for Gas Bubble Modelling, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K., International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 19, 415-437 (1994)

16-93 K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Simulation of Die Cavity Filling in Die Castings and an Evaluation of Process Parameters on Die Wear, Dept. of Industrial Systems Engineering, Presented by: N.A. Die Casting Association, Cleveland, Ohio, October 18-21, 1993

15-93 K. Venkatesen and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Modeling of Filling and Solidification for Improved Quality of Die Casting: A Literature Survey (Chapters II and III), Engineering Research Center for Net Shape Manufacturing, Report C-93-07, August 1993, Ohio State University

1-93 P-E Persson, Computer Simulation of the Solidification of a Hub Carrier for the Volvo 800 Series, AB Volvo Technological Development, Metals Laboratory, Technical Report No. LM 500014E, Jan. 1993

13-92 D. R. Korzekwa, M. A. K. Lewis, Experimentation and Simulation of Gravity Fed Lead Castings, in proceedings of a TMS Symposium on Concurrent Engineering Approach to Materials Processing, S. N. Dwivedi, A. J. Paul and F. R. Dax, eds., TMS-AIME Warrendale, p. 155 (1992)

12-92 M. A. K. Lewis, Near-Net-Shaiconpe Casting Simulation and Experimentation, MST 1992 Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory

2-92 M. R. Barkhudarov, H. You, J. Beech, S. B. Chin, D. H. Kirkwood, Validation and Development of FLOW-3D for Casting, School of Materials, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, presented at the TMS/AIME Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, March 3, 1992

1-92 D. R. Korzekwa and L. A. Jacobson, Los Alamos National Laboratory and C.W. Hirt, Flow Science Inc, Modeling Planar Flow Casting with FLOW-3D, presented at the TMS/AIME Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, March 3, 1992

12-91 R. Shivpuri, M. Kuthirakulathu, and M. Mittal, Nonisothermal 3-D Finite Difference Simulation of Cavity Filling during the Die Casting Process, Dept. Industrial and Systems Engineering, Ohio State University, presented at the 1991 Winter Annual ASME Meeting, Atlanta, GA, Dec. 1-6, 1991

3-91 C. W. Hirt, A FLOW-3D Study of the Importance of Fluid Momentum in Mold Filling, presented at the 18th Annual Automotive Materials Symposium, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, May 1-2, 1991 (FSI-91-00-2)

11-90 N. Saluja, O.J. Ilegbusi, and J. Szekely, On the Calculation of the Electromagnetic Force Field in the Circular Stirring of Metallic Melts, accepted in J. Appl. Physics, 1990

10-90 N. Saluja, O. J. Ilegbusi, and J. Szekely, On the Calculation of the Electromagnetic Force Field in the Circular Stirring of Metallic Molds in Continuous Castings, presented at the 6th Iron and Steel Congress of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Nagoya, Japan, October 1990

9-90 N. Saluja, O. J. Ilegbusi, and J. Szekely, Fluid Flow in Phenomena in the Electromagnetic Stirring of Continuous Casting Systems, Part I. The Behavior of a Cylindrically Shaped, Laboratory Scale Installation, accepted for publication in Steel Research, 1990

8-89 C. W. Hirt, Gravity-Fed Casting, Flow Science Technical Note #20, July 1989 (FSI-89-TN20)

6-89 E. W. M. Hansen and F. Syvertsen, Numerical Simulation of Flow Behaviour in Moldfilling for Casting Analysis, SINTEF-Foundation for Scientific and Industrial Research at the Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway, Report No. STS20 A89001, June 1989

1-88 C. W. Hirt and R. P. Harper, Modeling Tests for Casting Processes, Flow Science report, Jan. 1988 (FSI-88-38-01)

2-87 C. W. Hirt, Addition of a Solidification/Melting Model to FLOW-3D, Flow Science report, April 1987 (FSI-87-33-1)

Validations

금속 주조 설계 과정에서 FLOW-3D CAST의 사용은 회사의 비용 절감 방안을 제시하여 수익성을 개선할 수 있습니다. FLOW-3D CAST 는 엔지니어와 설계자에게 경험과 전문지식을 향상시킬 수 있는 강력한 도구가 될 수 있습니다. 보통 수익성은 비용 절감과 비용 회피에서 찾을 수 있습니다. 지금, 품질과 생산성 문제는 제품개발 단계에서 다양한 시뮬레이션 통해 짧은 공정시간, 낮은 비용으로 해결 할 수 있는 방안을 찾을 수 있습니다. 새로운 개발도구인 FLOW-3D CAST의 효율성은 생산이 시작되기 전에 문제를 해결할 수 있는 방안을 제시하여 생산성을 크게 개선할 수 있습니다.

Ladle Pour

샷 슬리브 공정을 최적화하는 것은 고품질 부품을 확보하는 데 필수적입니다. FLOW-3D CAST의 시뮬레이션 결과와 실제 사례의 비교를 통해, 시뮬레이션을 사용하여 엔지니어가 값 비싼 툴링을 제작하기 전에 설계를 개선하는 방법을 강조합니다. FLOW-3D CAST는 프로세스 전반에 걸쳐 유체의 움직임을 정확하게 포착할 수 있으므로, 엔지니어가 실제 레들 주입 공정에서 신속하게 파악할 수 있습니다. 시뮬레이션은 Nemak Poland Sp. z o.o로부터 제공받았습니다.

Gravity Casting

열전대 데이터를 기반으로 한 실제 충진 재구성과 비교 한 중력 주조 시뮬레이션. Courtesy of XC Engineering and Peugeot PSA.

Foundry: Simulating a Flow Fill Pattern

사형 주조 충진중의 X- 레이 검증

X -레이 결과와 FLOW-3D CAST 시뮬레이션 결과를 나란히 비교합니다. A356 알루미늄 합금으로 사형 주조의 3 차원 충진 색상은 금속의 압력을 나타냅니다. 시뮬레이션 결과는 수직 대칭 평면에 표시됩니다. Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes VII, London, 1995.

HPDC: Flow Pattern

Short sleeve validation – 시뮬레이션 결과와 주조 부품, Littler Diecast Corporation의 예

Modeling Air Entrapment

디젤 엔진 용 오일 필터 하우징의 X-ray vs. FLOW-3D CAST 검증.

디젤 엔진 용 오일 필터 하우징의 X- 레이 검증, 380 다이캐스팅 합금. 결과는 혼입 된 공기의 비율로 표시됩니다. X- 레이의 상세한 영역은 최대 다공도 농도를 나타냅니다.

HPDC Filling

FLOW-3D 결과를 실제 부품과 비교하는 HPDC 캐스팅 검증

Short Shot Simulation

실제 주조 부품의 유효성 검사. 스냅 샷과 FLOW-3D CAST 시뮬레이션 결과. 왼쪽에서 오른쪽으로 : 변속기 하우징, 오일 팬 및 자동차 부품.

HPDC Air Entrapment Defects

Antrametal에 의한 주조 시뮬레이션 대 실험 결과의 성공적인 비교.

Antmetetal의 고객 검증은 FLOW-3D CAST의 Air Entrapment 모델을 사용하여 실험 결과와 시뮬레이션을 비교 한 결과를 보여줍니다. 세탁기 용 전동 모터의 앞 커버의 HPDC입니다. 공기 관련 결함은 이미지의 색상에 정 성적으로 표시됩니다. FLOW-3D CAST 내의 다른 수치 기능에 의해 포착 된 물리적 공기 포켓 또한 명확하게 표현됩니다.

Core Drying

시뮬레이션과 무기 코어의 건조 실험 사이의 BMW에 의한 비교.

Predicting Die Erosion

캐비테이션으로 인한 다이 침식 영역은 FLOW-3D CAST 결과를 실제 사례와 비교하여 올바르게 배치되었습니다.

Predicting Lost Foam Filling

Lost foam L850 블록 벌크 헤드 슬라이스에 대한 실시간 X-ray 및 FLOW-3D CAST 유동 시뮬레이션 결과의 비교. 시뮬레이션은 GM Powertrain의 예입니다.

Porosity Defects

Porosity due to entrained air

Predicting Shrinkage Porosity

A380 diesel engine block casting

Downloads

FLOW-3D Cast Brochure

Bibliography

Models

Cooling Channels
Core Gas
Thermal Stress Evolution
More Modeling Capabilities

Case Studies

Adaption of Parameters in FLOW-3D for the Simulation of the Aluminum Integral Foam Molding Process
Numerical Analysis of Die-Casting Process in Thin Cavities Using Lubrication Approximation
Making the Switch: Improving High Pressure Die Casting Designs with Simulation

Conference Proceedings

Defect Prediction

주조 설계 시 주요 당면 과제는 최종 부품에 결함이 있는지 여부를 결정하는 것입니다. 설계자는 종종 게이트, 러너, 라이저, 주입 온도 및 냉각 크기 조정을 위한 모범 사례를 따름으로써 우수한 품질의 부품을 생산할 수 있습니다. 하지만 오늘날의 비즈니스 환경에서는 이 제품의 장점이 경쟁에서 이길 만큼 좋지 않을 수도 있습니다. 하지만 FLOW-3D CAST의 강력한 결점 예측 도구를 통해 주조 설계자는 짧은시간안에 보다 높은품질을 얻을 수 있을 것입니다.

Air Entrapment

FLOW-3D CAST의 공기 침투 모델은 채우는 동안 금속 주조 시스템에서 발생하는 공기 침입량을 추정하는 데 사용됩니다. 이 모델은 단순한 물리적 메커니즘을 기반으로 하며 뛰어난 예측 변수 또는 다공성입니다. 사용자는 시뮬레이션을 사용하여 공기 침투 결함을 방지하고, 시험 및 오류 과정을 제거할 수 있습니다. Air Entrapment Model에 대한 자세한 내용은 모델링 기능 섹션을 참조하십시오.

Core Gas Defects

Binder loss in two internal cores of a valve iron casting

FLOW-3D CAST의 코어 가스 모델을 사용하면, 금속 가열로 인한 모래 코어의 수지 바인더 분해 및 코어 가스 진화 과정을 모니터링하여, 코어 가스 배출을 제거할 수 있습니다. 주조물의 일부 바인더 손실은 코어 강도의 손실에 해당합니다. 또한 주조물의 주입 및 동결과 함께 모니터링할 때 이 모델은 용해된 금속에 대한 잠재적인 가스 폭발의 예측 변수이기도 합니다. 이러한 가스 결함 생성 가능성은 코어 가스 흐름 및 코어 가스 압력과 함께 계산됩니다.

Die Erosion Defects

FLOW-3D CAST는 고압 다이 캐스팅을 채우는 동안, 공동 현상으로 인한 금형 침식 결함을 정확하게 예측합니다. 금속 압력은 매우 빠른 흐름의 영역에서 금속 증기 압력 아래로 몇 개의 대기를 떨어뜨릴 수 있으며, 이는 공동 현상과 부식을 일으킬 수 있습니다. 공동 현상으로 인한 손상을 예측하는 간단한 방법은 실제로 흐름에 공동 현상 거품을 도입하지 않고도 공동 현상 또는 공동 현상의 가능성을 예측하는 것입니다. FLOW-3D CAST는 공동 현상 압력과 국소 유체 압력의 차이를 살펴봄으로써, 공동 현상의 가능성을 평가합니다. 셀의 위치에서 공동 현상과 금형 침식의 가능성은 이 차이가 클 때 존재하는 것으로 간주되는데, 금형 침식 가능성의 가장 신뢰할 수 있는 징후는 높은 위치의 “핫 스팟” 영역으로, 이 양의 값이 높은 작은 영역입니다.

Microporosity

FLOW-3D CAST는 응고 단계 후반에 발생하는 미세 기공 결함의 발생과 위치를 예측하기 위해 특별히 설계된 모델을 가지고 있습니다. 이 정보를 사용하여 설계를 조정하고 심각한 결점을 방지할 수 있습니다. 주조된 금속 부품은 응고 과정에서 금속이 수축할 때 발생하는 큰 내부 가스 포켓 또는 다공성을 가지고 있기 때문에 사용할 수 없는 경우가 있습니다. 대부분의 대형 다공성은 주조 몰드의 세심한 설계를 통해 제거할 수 있으므로, 특수 영역에 여분의 액체 금속을 보관하여 수축을 촉진할 수 있습니다. 금속이 수축을 보상하기 위해 흐를 수 있는 경우에는 대개 다공성이 발생하지 않습니다. 다공성의 또 다른 유형은 미세 다공성이라고도 하는데, 일반적으로 총 체적이 1%이하인 작은 기포의 분포로 나타나기 때문입니다. 따라서 미세한 기공의 위치와 크기를 예측할 수 있는 수단을 갖는 것이 상당히 흥미로운데, FLOW-3D CAST의 Microporosity 모델은 이러한 목적을 위해 개발되었습니다.

Solidification & Shrinkage

FLOW-3D CAST에는 과도한 수축이나 다공성의 응고 및 핀 포인트 영역을 모델링 하기 위한 전체 도구 모음이 있으므로, 이러한 결함을 확인할 수 있는 라이저 위치를 결정할 수 있습니다. 편석을 포함하여, 열로 인한 응력, 마이크로 및 매크로 다공성 등 응고와 관련된 다양한 결점이 있습니다. 정확한 응고 분석을 얻기 위한 중요한 첫번째 단계는 정확한 채우기입니다. 정확한 채우기는 응고 모델링의 초기 조건인 올바른 열 프로필을 캡처합니다. FLOW-3D CAST는 주조 공장이 주조 부품을 보다 신속하게 설계하고 폐기율을 낮출 수 있는 많은 응고 관련 결함을 감지할 수 있습니다.

Surface Oxides

FLOW-3D CAST의 결점 추적 기능을 통해 주조 엔지니어는 주입 공정에서 표면 산화물 결함이 발생할 가능성이 가장 높은 부위를 예측할 수 있습니다. 산화물은 용해된 금속 표면이 공기 중으로 노출되어 형성되며 바람직하지 않은 위치에 놓일 수 있습니다. 결함의 최종 위치는 전체 흐름 조건, 난류 혼합, 유체 분사 및 주입에 따라 달라집니다. FLOW-3D CAST는 이러한 산화물과 최종 위치를 정확하게 추적하여 설계를 개선합니다.

Thermal Stress Defect Prediction

FLOW-3D CAST의 열응력 모델을 사용하면 열응력 결점이 발생하는 위치와 주조물이 왜곡되는 방식을 정확하게 예측할 수 있습니다. 강도는 금형과 금속의 응고 과정에서 동시에 계산되며 이들 사이의 상호 작용을 위한 간단한 옵션을 제공합니다. 금속 주조물에서 열응력 결함을 제거할 수 있도록 모델링 기능 섹션에서 Thermal stress evolution 시뮬레이션에 대해 자세히 알아보십시오.

공기 갇힘 / Air Entrapment

FLOW-3D 의 공기 혼입 모델은 중력 주조 공정과 같은 금속 주조 시스템에서 발생하는 갇힌 공기의 양을 추정하는데 사용됩니다. 이는 단순한 물리적 메커니즘을 기반으로하므로 고압 다이 캐스팅 공정과 같은 다른 금속 주조 시스템에서 발생하는 혼입 공기의 양을 추정하는 데에도 사용할 수 있습니다. 최근 모델에 더 많은 물리적 세부 사항이 추가되어 기포 형태로 가정되는 동반 공기가 부력으로 인해 주변 액체 금속에서 상승하고 심지어 자유 표면에 도달하면 액체를 떠나는 것으로 모델링 할 수 있습니다.

고객 사례

Littler Diecast Co.

A380에 캐스팅 된 지지대. 공기 흡입에 의해 착색됩니다. Littler Diecast Co.의 예

Deco Products

Caster Wheel Leg part의 4 가지 시뮬레이션 사례. 이 부품들은 아연 합금 # 5로 만들어져 있습니다. 데코 제품의 예.

Shiloh Industries

동반 된 공기의 비율로 착색 된 전면 기어 하우징, 380 다이캐스팅 합금. Shiloh Industries의 예.
이 모델에 대한 더 자세한 정보는 Air Entrainment 의 Flow Science Report를 다운로드하십시오.

Microfluidics Bibliography

다음은 Microfluidics Bibliography의 기술 문서 모음입니다.
이 모든 논문은 FLOW-3D 결과를 특징으로 합니다. 미세 유체 공정 및 장치 를 성공적으로 시뮬레이션하기 위해 FLOW-3D 를 사용 하는 방법에 대해 자세히 알아보십시오 .

2024년 11월 20일 Update

109-24 Dileep Karnam, Yu-Lung Lo, Chia-Hua Yang, Spray mist-assisted drilling of through silicon vias (TSV) using nanosecond laser: Influence of CNT nanofluid, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 31; pp. 679-688, 2024. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.109

22-24 Bin-Jie Lai, Li-Tao Zhu, Zhe Chen, Bo Ouyang, Zheng-Hong Luo, Review on blood flow dynamics in lab-on-a-chip systems: an engineering perspective, Chem & Bio Engineering, 1.1; pp. 26-43, 2024. doi.org/10.1021/cbe.3c00014

196-23 Daicong Zhang, Chunhui Jing, Wei Guo, Yuan Xiao, Jun Luo, Lehua Qi, Microchannels formed using metal microdroplets, Micromachines, 14.10; 1922, 2023. doi.org/10.3390/mi14101922

121-23 Feng Lin Ng, Zhanhong Cen, Yi-Chin Toh, Lay Poh Tan, A 3D-printed micro-perfused culture device with embedded 3D fibrous scaffold for enhanced biomimicry, International Journal of Bioprinting, 2023. doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0226

104-23 Cristina González-Fernández, Jenifer Gómez-Pastora, Eugenio Bringas, Inmaculada Ortiz, Computer-aided design of magnetophoretic microfluidic systems for enhanced recovery of target products, 33rd European Symposium on Computer-Aided Engineering (ESCAPE), 2023.

64-23 Tihomir Tjankov, Dimitar Trifonov, Conceptual design and 3D modeling of a microfluidic device for liver cells investigation, Industry 4.0, 8.2; pp. 39-41, 2023.

34-23 Chao Kang, Ikki Ikeda, Motoki Sakaguchi, Recoil and solidification of a paraffin droplet impacted on a metal substrate: Numerical study and experimental verification, Journal of Fluids and Structures, 118; 103839, 2023. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2023.103839

64-22 Babatunde Aramide, Computational modelling of electrohydrodynamic jetting (Taylor cone formation, dripping & jet evolution): Case study of electrospinning, Thesis, University College London, 2022.

42-22 Islam Hassan, P. Ravi Selvaganapathy, Microfluidic printheads for highly switchable multimaterial 3D printing of soft materials, Advanced Materials Technologies, 2101709, 2022. doi.org/10.1002/admt.202101709

138-21 Enver Guler, Mine Eti, Aydin Cihanoglu, Esra Altiok, Kadriye Ozlem Hamaloglu, Burcu Gokcal, Ali Tuncel, Nalan Kabay, Ion exchange membranes with enhanced antifouling properties to produce energy from renewable sources, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Green and Smart Technologies for a Sustainable Society, Santander, Cantabria, Spain, December 9-10, 2021.

45-21 Navid Tonekaboni, Mahdi Feizbahr, Nima Tonekaboni, Guang-Jun Jiang, Hong-Xia Chen, Optimization of solar CCHP systems with collector enhanced by porous media and nanofluid, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021; 9984940, 2021. doi.org/10.1155/2021/9984840

40-21 B. Hayes, G.L. Whiting, R. MacCurdy, Modeling of contactless bubble–bubble interactions in microchannels with integrated inertial pumps, Physics of Fluids, 33.4; 042002, 2021. doi.org/10.1063/5.0041924

Below is a collection of technical papers in our Microfluidics Bibliography. All of these papers feature FLOW-3D results. Learn more about how FLOW-3D can be used to successfully simulate microfluidic processes and devices.

14-21 Jian-Chiun Liou, Chih-Wei Peng, Philippe Basset, Zhen-Xi Chen, DNA printing integrated multiplexer driver microelectronic mechanical system head (IDMH) and microfluidic flow estimation, Micromachines, 12.1; 25, 2021. doi.org/10.3390/mi12010025

08-20 Li Yong-Qiang, Dong Jun-Yan and Rui Wei, Numerical simulation for capillary driven flow in capsule-type vane tank with clearances under microgravity, Microgravity Science and Technology, 2020. doi.org/10.1007/s12217-019-09773-z

89-19 Tim Dreckmann, Julien Boeuf, Imke-Sonja Ludwig, Jorg Lumkemann, and Jorg Huwyler, Low volume aseptic filling: impact of pump systems on shear stress, European Journal of Pharmeceutics and Biopharmeceutics, in press, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.12.006

88-19 V. Amiri Roodan, J. Gomez-Pastora, C. Gonzalez-Fernandez, I.H. Karampelas, E. Bringas, E.P. Furlani, and I. Ortiz, CFD analysis of the generation and manipulation of ferrofluid droplets, TechConnect Briefs, pp. 182-185, 2019. TechConnect World Innovation Conference & Expo, Boston, Massachussetts, USA, June 17-19, 2019.

55-19 Julio Aleman, Sunil K. George, Samuel Herberg, Mahesh Devarasetty, Christopher D. Porada, Aleksander Skardal, and Graça Almeida‐Porada, Deconstructed microfluidic bone marrow on‐a‐chip to study normal and malignant hemopoietic cell–niche interactions, Small, 2019. doi: 10.1002/smll.201902971

37-19 Feng Lin Ng, Miniaturized 3D fibrous scaffold on stereolithography-printed microfluidic perfusion culture, Doctoral Thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2019.

32-19 Jenifer Gómez-Pastora, Ioannis H. Karampelas, Eugenio Bringas, Edward P. Furlani, and Inmaculada Ortiz, Numerical analysis of bead magnetophoresis from flowing blood in a continuous-flow microchannel: Implications to the bead-fluid interactions, Nature: Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, No. 7265, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43827-x

01-19 Jelena Dinic and Vivek Sharma, Computational analysis of self-similar capillary-driven thinning and pinch-off dynamics during dripping using the volume-of-fluid method, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 31, 2019. doi: 10.1063/1.5061715

75-18 Tobias Ladner, Sebastian Odenwald, Kevin Kerls, Gerald Zieres, Adeline Boillon and Julien Bœuf, CFD supported investigation of shear induced by bottom-mounted magnetic stirrer in monoclonal antibody formulation, Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 35, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s11095-018-2492-4

53-18 Venoos Amiri Roodan, Jenifer Gómez-Pastora, Aditi Verma, Eugenio Bringas, Inmaculada Ortiz and Edward P. Furlani, Computational analysis of magnetic droplet generation and manipulation in microfluidic devices, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer, Niagara Falls, Canada, June 7 – 9, 2018; Paper no. 154, 2018. doi: 10.11159/ffhmt18.154

35-18 Jenifer Gómez-Pastora, Cristina González Fernández, Marcos Fallanza, Eugenio Bringas and Inmaculada Ortiz, Flow patterns and mass transfer performance of miscible liquid-liquid flows in various microchannels: Numerical and experimental studies, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 344, pp. 487-497, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.110

16-18 P. Schneider, V. Sukhotskiy, T. Siskar, L. Christie and I.H. Karampelas, Additive Manufacturing of Microfluidic Components via Wax Extrusion, Biotech, Biomaterials and Biomedical TechConnect Briefs, vol. 3, pp. 162 – 165, 2018.

15-18 J. Gómez-Pastora, I.H. Karampelas, A.Q. Alorabi, M.D. Tarn, E. Bringas, A. Iles, V.N. Paunov, N. Pamme, E.P. Furlani, I. Ortiz, CFD analysis and experimental validation of magnetic droplet generation and deflection across multilaminar flow streams, Biotech, Biomaterials and Biomedical TechConnect Briefs, vol. 3, pp. 182-185, 2018.

14-18 J. Gómez-Pastora, C. González-Fernández, I.H. Karampelas, E. Bringas, E.P. Furlani, and I. Ortiz, Design of Magnetic Blood Cleansing Microdevices through Experimentally Validated CFD Modeling, Biotech, Biomaterials and Biomedical TechConnect Briefs, vol. 3, pp. 170-173, 2018.

10-18 A. Gupta, I.H. Karampelas, J. Kitting, Numerical modeling of the formation of dynamically configurable L2 lens in a microchannel, Biotech, Biomaterials and Biomedical TechConnect Briefs, Vol. 3, pp. 186 – 189, 2018.

17-17 I.H. Karampelas, J. Gómez-Pastora, M.J. Cowan, E. Bringas, I. Ortiz and E.P. Furlani, Numerical Analysis of Acoustophoretic Discrete Particle Focusing in Microchannels, Biotech, Biomaterials and Biomedical TechConnect Briefs 2017, Vol. 3

16-17 J. Gómez-Pastora, I.H. Karampelas, E. Bringas, E.P. Furlani and I. Ortiz, CFD analysis of particle magnetophoresis in multiphase continuous-flow bioseparators, Biotech, Biomaterials and Biomedical TechConnect Briefs 2017, Vol. 3

15-17 I.H. Karampelas, S. Vader, Z. Vader, V. Sukhotskiy, A. Verma, G. Garg, M. Tong and E.P. Furlani, Drop-on-Demand 3D Metal Printing, Informatics, Electronics and Microsystems TechConnect Briefs 2017, Vol. 4

102-16 J. Brindha, RA.G. Privita Edwina, P.K. Rajesh and P.Rani, “Influence of rheological properties of protein bio-inks on printability: A simulation and validation study,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 3, no.10, pp. 3285-3295, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.10.010

99-16 Ioannis H. Karampelas, Kai Liu, Fatema Alali, and Edward P. Furlani, Plasmonic Nanoframes for Photothermal Energy Conversion, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120 (13), pp 7256–7264

98-16 Jelena Dinic and Vivek Sharma, Drop formation, pinch-off dynamics and liquid transfer of simple and complex fluids, http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2016.MAR.B53.12, APS March Meeting 2016, Volume 61, Number 2, March 14–18, 2016, Baltimore, Maryland

67-16 Vahid Bazargan and Boris Stoeber, Effect of substrate conductivity on the evaporation of small sessile droplets, PHYSICAL REVIEW E 94, 033103 (2016), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.033103

57-16 Ioannis Karampelas, Computational analysis of pulsed-laser plasmon-enhanced photothermal energy conversion and nanobubble generation in the nanoscale, PhD Dissertation: Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, July 2016

44-16 Takeshi Sawada et al., Prognostic impact of circulating tumor cell detected using a novel fluidic cell microarray chip system in patients with breast cancer, EBioMedicine, Available online 27 July 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.027.

39-16 Chien-Hsun Wang, Ho-Lin Tsai, Yu-Che Wu and Weng-Sing Hwang, Investigation of molten metal droplet deposition and solidification for 3D printing techniques, IOP Publishing, J. Micromech. Microeng. 26 (2016) 095012 (14pp), doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/26/9/095012, July 8, 2016

30-16 Ioannis H. Karampelas, Kai Liu and Edward P. Furlani, Plasmonic Nanocages as Photothermal Transducers for Nanobubble Cancer Therapy, Nanotech 2016 Conference & Expo, May 22-25, Washington, DC.

29-16 Scott Vader, Zachary Vader, Ioannis H. Karampelas and Edward P. Furlani, Advances in Magnetohydrodynamic Liquid Metal Jet Printing, Nanotech 2016 Conference & Expo, May 22-25, Washington, DC.

02-16 Stephen D. Hoath (Editor), Fundamentals of Inkjet Printing: The Science of Inkjet and Droplets, ISBN: 978-3-527-33785-9, 472 pages, February 2016 (see chapters 2 and 3 for FLOW-3D results)

125-15 J. Berthier, K.A. Brakke, E.P. Furlani, I.H. Karampelas, V. Poher, D. Gosselin, M. Cubinzolles and P. Pouteau, Whole blood spontaneous capillary flow in narrow V-groove microchannels, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 206, pp. 258-267, 2015.

86-15 Yousub Lee and Dave F. Farson, Simulation of transport phenomena and melt pool shape for multiple layer additive manufacturing, J. Laser Appl. 28, 012006 (2016). doi: 10.2351/1.4935711, published online 2015.

77-15 Ho-Lin Tsai, Weng-Sing Hwang, Jhih-Kai Wang, Wen-Chih Peng and Shin-Hau Chen, Fabrication of Microdots Using Piezoelectric Dispensing Technique for Viscous Fluids, Materials 2015, 8(10), 7006-7016. doi: 10.3390/ma8105355

63-15 Scott Vader, Zachary Vader, Ioannis H. Karampelas and Edward P. Furlani, Magnetohydrodynamic Liquid Metal Jet Printing, TechConnect World Innovation Conference & Expo, Washington, D.C., June 14-17, 2015

46-15 Adwaith Gupta, 3D Printing Multi-Material, Single Printhead Simulation, Advanced Qualification of Additive Manufacturing Materials Workshop, July 20 – 21, 2015, Santa Fe, NM

28-15 Yongqiang Li, Mingzhu Hu, Ling Liu, Yin-Yin Su, Li Duan, and Qi Kang, Study of Capillary Driven Flow in an Interior Corner of Rounded Wall Under Microgravity, Microgravity Science and Technology, June 2015

20-15 Pamela J. Waterman, Diversity in Medical Simulation Applications, Desktop Engineering, May 2015, pp 22-26,

16-15 Saurabh Singh, Ann Junghans, Erik Watkins, Yash Kapoor, Ryan Toomey, and Jaroslaw Majewski, Effects of Fluid Shear Stress on Polyelectrolyte Multilayers by Neutron Scattering Studies, © 2015 American Chemical Society, DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00037, Langmuir 2015, 31, 2870−2878, February 17, 2015

11-15 Cheng-Han Wu and Weng-Sing Hwang, The effect of process condition of the ink-jet printing process on the molten metallic droplet formation through the analysis of fluid propagation direction, Canadian Journal of Physics, 2015. doi: 10.1139/cjp-2014-0259

03-15 Hanchul Cho, Sivasubramanian Somu, Jin Young Lee, Hobin Jeong and Ahmed Busnaina, High-Rate Nanoscale Offset Printing Process Using Directed Assembly and Transfer of Nanomaterials, Adv. Materials, doi: 10.1002/adma.201404769, February 2015

122-14 Albert Chi, Sebastian Curi, Kevin Clayton, David Luciano, Kameron Klauber, Alfredo Alexander-Katz, Sebastián D’hers and Noel M Elman, Rapid Reconstitution Packages (RRPs) implemented by integration of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 3D printed microfluidics, Research Gate, doi: 10.1007/s13346-014-0198-7, July 2014

113-14 Cihan Yilmaz, Arif E. Cetin, Georgia Goutzamanidis, Jun Huang, Sivasubramanian Somu, Hatice Altug, Dongguang Wei and Ahmed Busnaina, Three-Dimensional Crystalline and Homogeneous Metallic Nanostructures Using Directed Assembly of Nanoparticles, 10.1021/nn500084g, © 2014 American Chemical Society, April 2014

110-14 Koushik Ponnuru, Jincheng Wu, Preeti Ashok, Emmanuel S. Tzanakakis and Edward P. Furlani, Analysis of Stem Cell Culture Performance in a Microcarrier Bioreactor System, Nanotech, Washington, D.C., June 15-18, 2014

109-14 Ioannis H. Karampelas, Young Hwa Kim and Edward P. Furlani, Numerical Analysis of Laser Induced Photothermal Effects using Colloidal Plasmonic Nanostructures, Nanotech, Washington, D.C., June 15-18, 2014

108-14 Chenxu Liu, Xiaozheng Xue and Edward P. Furlani, Numerical Analysis of Fully-Coupled Particle-Fluid Transport and Free-Flow Magnetophoretic Sorting in Microfluidic Systems, Nanotech, Washington, D.C., June 15-18, 2014

95-14 Cheng-Han Wu, Weng-Sing Hwang, The effect of the echo-time of a bipolar pulse waveform on molten metallic droplet formation by squeeze mode piezoelectric inkjet printing, Accepted November 2014, Microelectronics Reliability (2014) , © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

61-14 Chenxu Liu, A Computational Model for Predicting Fully-Coupled Particle-Fluid Dynamics and Self-Assembly for Magnetic Particle Applications, Master’s Thesis: State University of New York at Buffalo, 2014, 75 pages; 1561583, http://gradworks.umi.com/15/61/1561583.html

41-14 Albert Chi, Sebastian Curi, Kevin Clayton, David Luciano, Kameron Klauber, Alfredo Alexander-Katz, Sebastian D’hers, and Noel M. Elman, Rapid Reconstitution Packages (RRPs) implemented by integration of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 3D printed microfluidics, Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res., DOI 10.1007/s13346-014-0198-7, # Controlled Release Society 2014. Available for purchase online at SpringerLink.

21-14 Suk-Hee Park, Ung Hyun Koh, Mina Kim, Dong-Yol Yang, Kahp-Yang Suh and Jennifer Hyunjong Shin, Hierarchical multilayer assembly of an ordered nanofibrous scaffold via thermal fusion bonding, Biofabrication 6 (2014) 024107 (10pp), doi:10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024107, IOP Publishing, 2014. Available for purchase online at IOP.

17-14 Vahid Bazargan, Effect of substrate cooling and droplet shape and composition on the droplet evaporation and the deposition of particles, Ph.D. Thesis: Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, March 2014, © Vahid Bazargan, 2014

73-13 Oliver G. Harlen, J. Rafael Castrejón-Pita, and Arturo Castrejon-Pita, Asymmetric Detachment from Angled Nozzles Plates in Drop-on Demand Inkjet Printing, NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference, 2013 International Conference on Digital Printing Technologies. Pages 253-549, pp. 277-280(4)

63-13 Fatema Alali, Ioannis H. Karampelas, Young Hwa Kim, and Edward P. Furlani, Photonic and Thermofluidic Analysis of Colloidal Plasmonic Nanorings and Nanotori for Pulsed-Laser Photothermal Applications, J. Phys. Chem. C, Article ASAP, DOI: 10.1021/jp406986y, Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society, September 2013.

25-13 Sudhir Srivastava, Theo Driessen, Roger Jeurissen, Herma Wijshoff, and Federico Toschi, Lattice Boltzmann Method to Study the Contraction of a Viscous Ligament, International Journal of Modern Physics © World Scientific Publishing Company, May 2013.

11-13 Li-Chieh Hsu, Yong-Jhih Chen, Jia-Huang Liou, Numerical Investigation in the Factors on the Pool Boiling, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 311 (2013) pp 456-461, © (2013) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.311.456. Available for purchase online at Scientific.Net.

10-13 Pamela J. Waterman, CFD: Shaping the Medical World, Desktop Engineering, April 2013. Full article available online at Desktop Engineering.

90-12 Charles R. Ortloff and Martin Vogel, Spray Cooling Heat Transfer- Test and CFD Analysis, Electronics Cooling, June 2012. Available online at Electronics Cooling.

79-12 Daniel Parsaoran Siregar, Numerical simulation of evaporation and absorption of inkjet printed droplets, Ph.D. Thesis: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, September 18, 2012, Copyright 2012 by D.P. Siregar, ISBN: 978-90-386-3190-5.

71-12 Jong-hyeon Chang, Kyu-Dong Jung, Eunsung Lee, Minseog Choi, Seungwan Lee, and Woonbae Kim, Varifocal liquid lens based on microelectrofluidic technology, Optics Letters, Vol. 37, Issue 21, pp. 4377-4379 (2012) http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.004377

70-12 Jong-hyeon Chang, Kyu-Dong Jung, Eunsung Lee, Minseog Choi, and Seunwan Lee, Microelectrofluidic Iris for Variable Aperture, Proc. SPIE 8252, MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems XI, 82520O (February 9, 2012); doi:10.1117/12.906587

69-12 Jong-hyeon Chang, Eunsung Lee, Kyu-Dong Jung, Seungwan Lee, Minseog Choi, and Woonbae Kim, Microelectrofluidic Lens for Variable Curvature, Proc. SPIE 8486, Current Developments in Lens Design and Optical Engineering XIII, 84860X (October 11, 2012); doi:10.1117/12.925852.

61-12 Biddut Bhattacharjee, Study of Droplet Splitting in an Electrowetting Based Digital Microfluidic System, Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Graduate Studies (Applied Sciences), The University of British Columbia, September 2012, © Biddut Bhattacharjee.

54-12 Edward P. Furlani, Anthony Nunez, Gianmarco Vizzeri, Modeling Fluid Structure-Interactions for Biomechanical Analysis of the Human Eye, Nanotech Conference & Expo, June 18-21, 2012, Santa Clara, CA.

53-12 Xinyun Wu, Richard D. Oleschuk and Natalie M. Cann, Characterization of microstructured fibre emitters in pursuit of improved nano electrospray ionization performance, The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012, http://pubs.rsc.org, DOI: 10.1039/c2an35249d, May 2012

25-12 Edward P. Furlani, Ioannis H. Karampelas and Qian Xie, Analysis of Pulsed Laser Plasmon-assisted Photothermal Heating and Bubble Generation at the Nanoscale, Lab on a Chip, 10.1039/C2LC40495H, Received 01 May 2012, Accepted 07 Jun 2012. First published on the web 13 Jun 2012.

22-12 R.A. Sultanov, D. Guster, Numerical Modeling and Simulations of Pulsatile Human Blood Flow in Different 3D-Geometries, Book chapter #21 in Fluid Dynamics, Computational Modeling and Applications (2012), ISBN: 978-953-51-0052-2, p. 475 [18 pages]. Available online at INTECH.

21-12 Guo-Wei Huang, Tzu-Yi Hung, and Chin-Tai Chen, Design, Simulation, and Verification of Fluidic Light-Guide Chips with Various Geometries of Micro Polymer Channels, NEMS 2012, Kyoto, Japan, March 5-8, 2012. Available for purchase online at IEEE.

103-11 Suk-Hee Park, Development of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds containing Electrospun Nanofibers and their Applications to Tissue Regeneration, Ph.D. Thesis: School of Mechanical, Aersospace and Systems Engineering, Division of Mechanical Engineering, KAIST, 2011.

81-11 Xinyun Wu, Modeling and Characterization of Microfabricated Emitters-In Pursuit of Improved ESI-MS Performance, thesis: Department of Chemistry, Queen’s University, December 2011, Copyright © Xinyun Wu, 2011

77-11 Ge Bai, W. Thomas Leach, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) insights into agitation stress methods in biopharmaceutical development, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Available online 8 December 2011, ISSN 0378-5173, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.11.044. Available online at SciVerse.

72-11 M.R. Barkhudarov, C.W. Hirt, D. Milano, and G. Wei, Comments on a Comparison of CFD Software for Microfluidic Applications, Flow Science Technical Note #93, FSI-11-TN93, December 2011

45-11 Chang-Wei Kang, Jiak Kwang Tan, Lunsheng Pan, Cheng Yee Low and Ahmed Jaffar, Numerical and experimental investigations of splat geometric characteristics during oblique impact of plasma spraying, Applied Surface Science, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 20 July 2011, ISSN 0169-4332, DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.081. Available to purchase online at SciVers

33-11 Edward P. Furlani, Mark T. Swihart, Natalia Litchinitser, Christopher N. Delametter and Melissa Carter, Modeling Nanoscale Plasmon-assisted Bubble Nucleation and Applications, Nanotech Conference and Expo 2011, Boston, MA, June 13-16, 2011

32-11 Lu, Cong and Mills, James K., Three cell separation design for realizing automatic cell injection, Complex Medical Engineering (CME), 2011 IEEE/ICME, pp: 599 – 603, Harbin, China, 10.1109/ICCME.2011.5876811, June 2011. Available online at IEEEXplore.

25-11 Issam M. Bahadur, James K. Mills, Fluidic vacuum-based biological cell holding device with piezoelectrically induced vibration, Complex Medical Engineering (CME), 2011 IEEE/ICME International Conference on, 22-25 May 2011, pp: 85 – 90, Harbin, China. Available online at: IEEE Xplore.

14-11 Edward P. Furlani, Roshni Biswas, Alexander N. Cartwright and Natalia M. Litchinitser, Antiresonant guiding optofluidic biosensor, doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2011.04.014, Optics Communication, April 2011

05-11 Hyeju Eom and Keun Park, Integrated numerical analysis to evaluate replication characteristics of micro channels in a locally heated mold by selective induction, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Volume 12, Number 1, 53-60, DOI: 10.1007/s12541-011-0007-x, 2011. Available online at: SpringerLink.

70-10 I.N. Volnov, V.S. Nagornyi, Modeling Processes for Generation of Streams of Monodispersed Fluid Droplets in Electro-inkjet Applications, Science and Technology News, St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 4, pp 294-300, 2010. In Russian.

62-10 F. Mobadersani, M. Eskandarzade, S. Azizi and S. Abbasnezhad, Effect of Ambient Pressure on Bubble Growth in Micro-Channel and Its Pumping Effect, ESDA2010-24436, pp. 577-584, doi:10.1115/ESDA2010-24436, ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (ESDA2010), Istanbul, Turkey, July 12–14, 2010. Available online at the ASME Digital Library.

58-10 Tsung-Yi Ho, Jun Zeng, and Chakrabarty, K, Digital microfluidic biochips: A vision for functional diversity and more than moore, Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), 2010 IEEE/ACM International Conference on, DOI: 10.1109/ICCAD.2010.5654199, © IEEE, November 2010. Available online at IEEE Explore.

51-10 Regina Bleul, Marion Ritzi-Lehnert, Julian Höth, Nico Scharpfenecker, Ines Frese, Dominik Düchs, Sabine Brunklaus, Thomas E. Hansen-Hagge, Franz-Josef Meyer-Almes, Klaus S. Drese, Compact, cost-efficient microfluidics-based stopped-flow device, Anal Bioanal Chem, DOI 10.1007/s00216-010-4446-5, Available online at Springer, November 2010

22-10 Krishendu Chakrabarty, Richard B. Fair and Jun Zeng, Design Tools for Digital Microfluidic Biochips Toward Functional Diversification and More than Moore, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 29, No. 7, July 2010

14-10 E. P. Furlani and M. S. Hanchak, Nonlinear analysis of the deformation and breakup of viscous microjets using the method of lines, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids (2010), © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Published online in Wiley InterScience. DOI: 10.1002/fld.2205

55-09 R.A. Sultanov, and D. Guster, Computer simulations of pulsatile human blood flow through 3D models of the human aortic arch, vessels of simple geometry and a bifurcated artery, Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS (Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society), Minneapolis, September 2-6, 2009, p.p. 4704-4710.

30-09 Anurag Chandorkar and Shayan Palit, Simulation of Droplet Dynamics and Mixing in Microfluidic Devices using a VOF-Based Method, Sensors & Transducers journal, ISSN 1726-5479 © 2009 by IFSA, Vol.7, Special Issue “MEMS: From Micro Devices to Wireless Systems,” October 2009, pp. 136-149.

13-09 E.P. Furlani, M.C. Carter, Analysis of an Electrostatically Actuated MEMS Drop Ejector, Presented at Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, Texas, USA, May 3-7, 2009

12-09 A. Chandorkar, S. Palit, Simulation of Droplet-Based Microfluidics Devices Using a Volume-of-Fluid Approach, Presented at Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, Texas, USA, May 3-7, 2009

3-09 Christopher N. Delametter, FLOW-3D Speeds MEMS Inkjet Development, Desktop Engineering, January 2009

42-08 Tien-Li Chang, Jung-Chang Wang, Chun-Chi Chen, Ya-Wei Lee, Ta-Hsin Chou, A non-fluorine mold release agent for Ni stamp in nanoimprint process, Microelectronic Engineering 85 (2008) 1608–1612

26-08 Pamela J. Waterman, First-Pass CFD Analyses – Part 2, Desktop Engineering, November 2008

09-08 M. Ren and H. Wijshoff, Thermal effect on the penetration of an ink droplet onto a porous medium, Proc. Eurotherm2008 MNH, 1 (2008)

04-08 Delametter, Christopher N., MEMS development in less than half the time, Small Times, Online Edition, May 2008

02-08 Renat A. Sultanov, Dennis Guster, Brent Engelbrekt and Richard Blankenbecler, 3D Computer Simulations of Pulsatile Human Blood Flows in Vessels and in the Aortic Arch – Investigation of Non-Newtonian Characteristics of Human Blood, The Journal of Computational Physics, arXiv:0802.2362v1 [physics.comp-ph], February 2008

01-08 Herman Wijshoff, thesis: University of Twente, Structure- and fluid dynamics in piezo inkjet printheads, ISBN 978-90-365-2582-4, Venlo, The Netherlands January 2008.

30-07 A. K. Sen, J. Darabi, and D. R. Knapp, Simulation and parametric study of a novel multi-spray emitter for ESI–MS applications, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, Volume 3, Number 3, June 2007, pp. 283-298(16)

28-07 Dan Soltman and Vivek Subramanian, Inkjet-Printed Line Morphologies and Temperature Control of the Coffee Ring Effect, Langmuir; 2008; ASAP Web Release Date: 16-Jan-2008; (Research Article) DOI: 10.1021/la7026847

23-07 A K Sen and J Darabi, Droplet ejection performance of a monolithic thermal inkjet print head, Journal of Micromechanical and Microengineering,vol.17, pp.1420-1427 (2007) doi:10.1088/0960-1317/17/8/002; Abstract only.

18-07 Herman Wisjhoff, Better Printheads Via Simulation, Desktop Engineering, October 2007, Vol. 13, Issue 2

17-07 Jos de Jong, Ph.D. Thesis: University of Twente, Air entrapment in piezo inkjet printing, ISBN 978-90-365-2483-4, April 2007

15-07 Krishnendu Chakrabarty and Jun Zeng, (Ed.), Design Automation Methods and Tools for Microfluidics-Based Biochips, Springer, September 2006.

14-07 Fei Su and Jun Zeng, Computer-aided design and test for digital microfluidics, IEEE Design & Test of Computers, 24(1), 2007, 60-70.

13-07 Jun Zeng, Modeling and simulation of electrified droplets and its application to computer-aided design of digital microfluidics, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 25(2), 2006, 224-233.

12-07 Krishnendu Chakrabarty and Jun Zeng, (2005), Automated top-down design for microfluidic biochips, ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, 1(3), 2005, 186–223.

01-07 Wijshoff, Herman, Drop formation mechanisms in piezo-acoustic inkjet, NSTI-Nanotech 2007, ISBN 1420061844 Vol. 3, 2007)

23-06 John J. Uebbing, Stephan Hengstler, Dale Schroeder, Shalini Venkatesh, and Rick Haven, Heat and Fluid Flow in an Optical Switch Bubble, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Vol. 15, No. 6, December 2006

21-06 Wijshoff, Herman, Manipulating Drop Formation in Piezo Acoustic Inkjet, Proc. IS&T’s NIP22, 79 (2006)

20-06 J. de Jong, H. Reinten, M. van den Berg, H. Wijshoff, M. Versluis, G. de Bruin, A. Prosperetti and D. Lohse, Air entrapment in piezo-driven inkjet printheads, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120(3), 1257 (2006)

11-06 A. K. Sen, J. Darabi, D. R. Knapp and J. Liu, Modeling and Characterization of a Carbon Fiber Emitter for Electrospray Ionization, 1 MEMS and Microsystems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, 300 Main Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA, 2 Department of Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

5-06 E. P. Furlani, B. G. Price, G. Hawkins, and A. G. Lopez, Thermally Induced Marangoni Instability of Liquid Microjets with Application to Continuous Inkjet Printing, Proceedings of NSTI Nanotech Conference 2006, Vol. 2, pp 534-537.

28-05 O B Fawehinmi, P H Gaskell, P K Jimack, N Kapur, and H M Thompson, A combined experimental and computational fluid dynamics analysis of the dynamics of drop formation, May 2005. DOI: 10.1243/095440605X31788

5-05 E. P. Furlani, Thermal Modulation and Instability of Newtonian Liquid Microjets, presented at Nanotech 2005, Anaheim, CA, May 8-12, 2005.

1-05 C.W. Hirt, Electro-Hydrodynamics of Semi-Conductive Fluids: With Application to Electro-Spraying, Flow Science Technical Note #70, FSI-05-TN70

19-04 G. F. Yao, Modeling of Electroosmosis Without Resolving Physics Inside a Electric Double Layer, Flow Science Technical Note (FSI-04-TN69)

12-04 Jun Zeng and Tom Korsmeyer, Principles of Droplet Electrohydrodynamics for Lab-on-a-Chip, Lab. Chip. Journal, 2004, 4(4), 265-277

9-04 Constantine N. Anagnostopoulos, James M. Chwalek, Christopher N. Delametter, Gilbert A. Hawkins, David L. Jeanmaire, John A. Lebens, Ali Lopez, and David P. Trauernicht, Micro-Jet Nozzle Array for Precise Droplet Metering and Steering Having Increased Droplet Deflection, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, sponsored by IEEE, Boston, June 8-12, 2003, pp. 368-71

8-04 Christopher N. Delametter, David P. Trauernicht, James M. Chwalek, Novel Microfluidic Jet Deflection – Significant Modeling Challenge with Great Application Potential, Technical Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems sponsored by NSTI, San Juan, Puerto Rico, April 21-25, 2002, pp. 44-47

6-04 D. Vadillo*, G. Desie**, A Soucemarianadin*, Spreading Behavior of Single and Multiple Drops, *Laboratoire des Ecoulements Geophysiques et Industriels (LEGI), and **AGFA-Gevaert Group N.V., XXI ICTAM, 15-21 August 2004, Warsaw, Poland

2-04 Herman Wijshoff, Free Surface Flow and Acousto-Elastic Interaction in Piezo Inkjet, Nanotech 2004, sponsored by the Nano Science & Technology Institute, Boston, MA, March 2004

30-03 D Souders, I Khan and GF Yao, Alessandro Incognito, and Matteo Corrado, A Numerical Model for Simulation of Combined Electroosmotic and Pressure Driven Flow in Microdevices, 7th International Symposium on Fluid Control, Measurement and Visualization

27-03 Jun Zeng, Daniel Sobek and Tom Korsmeyer, Electro-Hydrodynamic Modeling of Electrospray Ionization – CAD for a µFluidic Device-Mass Spectrometer Interface, Agilent Technologies Inc, paper presented at Transducers 2003, June 03 Boston (note: Reference #10 is to FLOW-3D)

17-03 John Uebbing, Switching Fiber-optic Circuits with Microscopic Bubbles, Sensors Magazine, May 2003, Vol 20, No 5, p 36-42

16-03 CFD Speeds Development of MEMS-based Printing Technology, MicroNano Magazine, June 2003, Vol 8, No 6, p 16

3-03 Simulation Speeds Design of Microfluidic Medical Devices, R&D Magazine, March 2003, pp 18-19

1-03 Simulations Help Microscopic Bubbles Switch Fiber-Optic Circuits, Agilent Technologies, Fiberoptic Product News, January 2003, pp 22-23

27-02 Feng, James Q., A General Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Drop Ejection in Drop-on-Demand Ink Jet Devices, Journal of Imaging Science and Technology®, Volume 46, Number 5, September/October 2002

1-02 Feixia Pan, Joel Kubby, and Jingkuang Chen, Numerical Simulation of Fluid Structure Interaction in a MEMS Diaphragm Drop Ejector, Xerox Wilson Research Center, Institute of Physics Publishing, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 12 (2002), PII: SO960-1317(02)27439-2, pp. 70-76

48-01 Rainer Gruber, Radial Mass Transfer Enhancement in Bubble-Train Flow, PhD thesis in Engineering Sciences, Rheinisch- Westf alischen Technische Hochschule Aachen, December 2001.

34-01 Furlani, E.P., Delametter, C.N., Chwalek, J.M., and Trauernicht, D., Surface Tension Induced Instability of Viscous Liquid Jets, Fourth International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems, April 2001

12-01 C. N. Delametter, Eastman Kodak Company, Micro Resolution, Mechanical Engineering, Col 123/No 7, July 2001, pp 70-72

11-01 C. N. Delametter, Eastman Kodak Company, Surface Tension Induced Instability of Viscous Liquid Jets, Technical Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems, April 2001

9-01 Aman Khan, Unipath Limited Research and Development, Effects of Reynolds Number on Surface Rolling in Small Drops, PVP-Col 431, Emerging Technologies for Fluids, Structures and Fluids, Structures and Fluid Structure Interaction — 2001

2-00 Narayan V. Deshpande, Significance of Inertance and Resistance in Fluidics of Thermal Ink-Jet Transducers, Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, Volume 40, Number 5, Sept./Oct. 1996, pp.457-461

4-98 D. Deitz, Connecting the Dots with CFD, Mechanical Engineering Magazine, pp. 90-91, March 1998

14-94 M. P. O’Hare, N. V. Deshpande, and D. J. Drake, Drop Generation Processes in TIJ Printheads, Xerox Corporation, Adv. Imaging Business Unit, IS&T’s Tenth International Congress on Advances in Non-Impact Printing, Tech. 1994

14-92 Asai, A.,Three-Dimensional Calculation of Bubble Growth and Drop Ejection in a Bubble Jet Printer, Journal of Fluids Engineering Vol. 114 December 1992:638-641

Coating Bibliography

아래는 코팅 참고 문헌의 기술 문서 모음입니다.
이 모든 논문은 FLOW-3D 결과를 포함하고 있습니다. FLOW-3D를 사용하여 코팅 공정을 성공적으로 시뮬레이션 하는 방법에 대해 자세히 알아보십시오.

Coating Bibliography

2024년 11월 20일 Update

98-24 Fabiano I. Indicatti, Bo Cheng, Michael Rädler, Elisabeth Stammen, Klaus Dilger, Experimental and numerical investigation of the squeegee process during stencil printing of thick adhesive sealings, The Journal of Adhesion, 2024. doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2024.2356105

130-22 Md Didarul Islam, Himendra Perera, Benjamin Black, Matthew Phillips, Muh-Jang Chen, Greyson Hodges, Allyce Jackman, Yuxuan Liu, Chang-Jin Kim, Mohammed Zikry, Saad Khan, Yong Zhu, Mark Pankow, Jong Eun Ryu, Template-free scalable fabrication of linearly periodic microstructures by controlling ribbing defects phenomenon in forward roll coating for multifunctional applications, Advanced Materials Interfaces, 9.27; 2201237, 2022. doi.org/10.1002/admi.202201237

03-21 Delong Jia, Peng Yi, Yancong Liu, Jiawei Sun, Shengbo Yue, Qi Zhao, Effect of laser textured groove wall interface on molybdenum coating diffusion and metallurgical bonding, Surface and Coatings Technology, 405; 126561, 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126561

50-19 Peng Yi, Delong Jia, Xianghua Zhan, Pengun Xu, and Javad Mostaghimi, Coating solidification mechanism during plasma-sprayed filling the laser textured grooves, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 142, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118451

85-18 Zia Jang, Oliver Litfin and Antonio Delgado, A semi-analytical approach for prediction of volume flow rate in nip-fed reverse roll coating process, Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 18, no. 1, Special Issue: 89^th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2018. doi: 10.1002/pamm.201800317

80-14 Hiroaki Koyama, Kazuhiro Fukada, Yoshitaka Murakami, Satoshi Inoue, and Tatsuya Shimoda, Investigation of Roll-to-Sheet Imprinting for the Fabrication of Thin-film Transistor Electrodes, IEICE TRAN, ELECTRON, VOL.E97-C, NO.11, November 2014

46-14 Isabell Vogeler, Andreas Olbers, Bettina Willinger and Antonio Delgado, Numerical investigation of the onset of air entrainment in forward roll coating, 17th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium September 7-10, 2014 San Diego, CA, USA

17-12 Chi-Feng Lin, Bo-Kai Wang, Carlos Tiu and Ta-Jo Liu, On the Pinning of Downstream Meniscus for Slot Die Coating, Advances in Polymer Technology, Vol. 00, No. 0, 1-9 (2012) © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Available online at Wiley.

01-11 Reid Chesterfield, Andrew Johnson, Charlie Lang, Matthew Stainer, and Jonathan Ziebarth, Solution-Coating Technology for AMOLED Displays, Information Display Magazine, 1/11 0362-0972/01/2011-024 © SID 2011.

61-09 Yi-Rong Chang, Chi-Feng Lin and Ta-Jo Liu, Start-up of slot die coating, Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 49, pp. 1158-1167, 2009. doi:10.1002/pen.21360

26-06 James M. Brethour, 3-D transient simulation of viscoelastic coating flows, 13th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, September 2006, Denver, Colorado

19-06 Ivosevic, M., Cairncross, R. A., and Knight, R., 3D Predictions of Thermally Sprayed Polymer Splats Modeling Particle Acceleration, Heating and Deformation on Impact with a Flat Substrate, Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer, 49, pp. 3285 – 3297, 2006

9-06 M. Ivosevic, R. A. Cairncross, R. Knight, T. E. Twardowski, V. Gupta, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA; J. A. Baldoni, Duke University, Durham, NC, Effect of Substrate Roughness on Splatting Behavior of HVOF Sprayed Polymer Particles Modeling and Experiments, International Thermal Spray Conference, Seattle, WA, May 2006.

26-05 Ivosevic, M., Cairncross, R. A., Knight, R., Impact Modeling of Thermally Sprayed Polymer Particles, Proc. International Thermal Spray Conference [ITSC-2005], Eds., DVS/IIW/ASM-TSS, Basel, Switzerland, May 2005.

11-05 Brethour, J., Simulation of Viscoelastic Coating Flows with a Volume-of-fluid Technique, in Proceedings of the 6th European Coating Symposium, Bradford, UK, 2005

1-05 C.W. Hirt, Electro-Hydrodynamics of Semi-Conductive Fluids: With Application to Electro-Spraying, Flow Science Technical Note #70, FSI-05-TN70

38-04 K.H. Ho and Y.Y. Zhao, Modelling thermal development of liquid metal flow on rotating disc in centrifugal atomisation, Materials Science and Engineering, A365, pp. 336-340, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.044

30-04 M. Ivosevic, R.A. Cairncross, and R. Knight, Impact Modeling of HVOF Sprayed Polymer Particles, Presented at the 12th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Rochester, New York, September 23-25, 2004

29-04 J.M. Brethour and C.W. Hirt, Stains Arising from Dried Liquid Drops, Presented at the 12th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Rochester, New York, September 23-25, 2004

20-03 James Brethour, Filling and Emptying of Gravure Cells–A CFD Analysis, Convertech Pacific October 2002, Vol. 10, No 4, p 34-37

4-03 M. Toivakka, Numerical Investigation of Droplet Impact Spreading in Spray Coating of Paper, In Proceedings of 2003 TAPPI 8th Advanced Coating Fundamentals Symposium, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 2003

28-02 J.M. Brethour and H. Benkreira, Filling and Emptying of Gravure Cells—Experiment and CFD Comparison, 11th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, September 23-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota

22-02 Hirt, C.W., and Brethour, J.M., Contact Line on Rough Surfaces with Application to Air Entrainment, Presented at the 11th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, September 23-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Unpublished.

17-01 J. M. Brethour, C. W. Hirt, Moving Contact Lines on Rough Surfaces, 4th European Coating Symposium, 2001, Belgium

16-01 J. M. Brethour, Filling and Emptying of Gravure Cells–-A CFD Analysis, proceedings of the 4th European Coating Symposium 2001, October 1-4, 2001, Brussels, Belgium

26-00 Ronald H. Miller and Gary S. Strumolo, A Self-Consistent Transient Paint Simulation, Proceedings of IMEC2000: 2000 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 2000, Orlando, Florida

6-99 C. W. Hirt, Direct Computation of Dynamic Contact Angles and Contact Lines, ECC99 Coating Conference, Erlangen, Germany (FSI-99-00-2), Sept. 1999

7-98 J. E. Richardson and Y. Becker, Three-Dimensional Simulation of Slot Coating Edge Effects, Flow Science Inc, and Polaroid Corporation, presented at the 9th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Newark, DE, May 18-20, 1998

6-98 C. W. Hirt and E. Choinski, Simulation of the Wet-Start Process in Slot Coating, Flow Science Inc, and Polaroid Corporation, presented at the 9th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Newark, DE, May 18-20, 1998

3-97 C. W. Hirt and J. E. Richardson of Flow Science Inc, and K.S. Chen, Sandia National Laboratory, Simulation of Transient and Three-Dimensional Coating Flows Using a Volume-of-Fluid Technique, presented at the 50th Annual Conference of the Society for Imaging and Science Technology, Boston, MA 18-23 May 1997

2-96 C. W. Hirt, K. S. Chen, Simulation of Slide-Coating Flows Using a Fixed Grid and a Volume-of-Fluid Front-Tracking Technique, presented a the 8th International Coating Process Science & Technology Symposium, February 25-29, 1996, New Orleans, LA

Metal Casting Bibliography

다음은 금속 주조 참고 문헌의 기술 문서 모음입니다.
이 모든 논문은 FLOW-3D CAST 결과를 포함하고 있습니다. FLOW-3D CAST 를 사용하여 금속 주조 산업의 어플리케이션을 성공적으로 시뮬레이션 하는 방법에 대해 자세히 알아보십시오.

2024년 11월 20일 Update

93-24 Benedict Baumann, Andreas Kessler, Claudia Dommaschk, Gotthard Wolf , Influence of filter structure and casting system on filtration efficiency in aluminum mold casting, Multifunctional Ceramic Filter Systems for Metal Melt Filtration, Eds. C.G. Aneziris, H. Biermann, Springer Series in Materials Science, 337; 2024. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40930-1_28

87-24 Rahul Jayakumar, T.P.D. Rajan, Sivaraman Savithri, A GPU based accelerated solver for simulation of heat transfer during metal casting process, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 32.5; 055013, 2024. doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ad4406

46-24 Masyrukan, Irwan Mawarda, Sunardi Wiyono, Bibit Sugito, Ummi Kultsum, Dessy Ade Pratiwi, Desi Gustiani, Nur Annisa Istiqamah, The effect of differences in in-gate diameter size on the structure and mechanical properties of aluminum (Al) castings in pipe products with a red sand mold, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2838.1; 2024. doi.org/10.1063/5.0185773

43-24 German Alberto Barragán De Los Rios, Silvio Andrés Salazar Martínez, Emigdio Mendoza Fandiño, Patricia Fernández-Morales, Numerical simulation of aluminum foams by space holder infiltration, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2024. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-024-01287-8

40-24 Bin Zhang, Gary P. Grealy, Thermomechanical modeling on AirSlip® billet DC casting of high-strength crack-prone aluminum alloys, Light Metals 2024, Eds. S. Wagstaff, pp. 1015-1025, 2024. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50308-5_128

35-24 Balaji Chandrakanth, Ved Prakash, Adwaita Maiti, Diya Mukherjee, Development of triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) inspired structured cast iron foams through casting route, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2024. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-01247-8

19-24 Diya Mukherjee, Himadri Roy, Balaji Chandrakanth, Nilrudra Mandal, Sudip Kumar Samanta, Manidipto Mukherjee, Enhancing properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy through microalloying and heat treatment, Materials Chemistry and Physics, 314; 128881, 2024. doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.128881

181-23 Daichi Minamide, Ken’ichi Yano, Masahiro Sano, Takahiro Aoki, Overflow design system to decrease gas defects considering the direction of molten metal flow, 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME), pp. 1-6, 2023. doi.org/10.1109/ICECCME57830.2023.10253413

102-23 Daichi Minamide, Ken’ichi Yano, Masahiro Sano, Takahiro Aoki, Automatic design of overflow system for preventing gas defects by considering the direction of molten metal flow, Computer-Aided Design, 163; 103586, 2023. doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2023.103586

87-23 Prosenjit Das, Optimisation of melt pouring temperature and low superheat casting of Al-15Mg2Si-4.5Si composite, International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 36.1-3; 2023. doi.org/10.1080/13640461.2023.2211895

60-23 Yuanhao Gu, Feng Wang, Jian Jiao, Zhi Wang, Le Zhou, Pingli Mao, Zheng Liu, Study on semisolid rheo-diecasting process, microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-6Al-1Ca-0.5Sb alloy with high solid fraction, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2023. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-01001-0

48-23 Patricia Fernández‑Morales, Lauramaría Echeverrí, Emigdio Mendoza Fandiño, Alejandro Alberto Zuleta Gil, Replication casting and additive manufacturing for fabrication of cellular aluminum with periodic topology: optimization by CFD simulation, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26; pp. 1789-1797, 2023. doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11124-7

45-23 Daniel Martinez, Philip King, Santosh Reddy Sama, Jay Sim, Hakan Toykoc, Guha Manogharan, Effect of freezing range on reducing casting defects through 3D sand-printed mold designs, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023. doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11112-x

38-23 Emanuele Pagone, Christopher Jones, John Forde, William Shaw, Mark Jolly, Konstantinos Salonitis, Defect minimization in vacuum-assisted plaster mould investment casting through simulation of high-value aluminium alloy components, TMS 2023: Light Metals, pp. 1078-1086, 2023.

33-23 Philip King, Guha Manogharan, Novel experimental method for metal flow analysis using open molds for sand casting, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2023. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-00966-2

32-23 Sujeet Kumar Gautam, Himadri Roy, Aditya Kumar Lohar, Sudip Kumar Samanta, Studies on mold filling behavior of Al–10.5Si–1.7Cu Al alloy during rheo pressure die casting system, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2023. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-00958-2

31-23 Anand Kumbhare, Prasenjit Biswas, Anil Bisen, Chandan Choudary, Investigation of effect of the rheological parameters on the flow behavior of ADC12 Al alloy in rheo-pressure die casting, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2023. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-00962-6

24-23 Natalia Raźny, Anna Dmitruk, Maria Serdechnova, Carsten Blawert, Joanna Ludwiczak, Krzysztof Naplocha, The performance of thermally conductive tree-like cast aluminum structures in PCM-based storage units, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 142; 106606, 2023. doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106606

172-22 J. Yokesh Kumar, S. Gopi, K.S. Amirthagadeswaran, Redesigning and numerical simulation of gating system to reduce cold shut defect in submersible pump part castings, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 2022. doi.org/10.1177/0954408922114218

125-22 Maximilian Erber, Tobias Rosnitschek, Christoph Hartmann, Bettina Alber-Laukant, Stephan Tremmel, Wolfram Volk, Geometry-based assurance of directional solidification for complex topology-optimized castings using the medial axis transform, Computer-Aided Design, 152; 103394, 2022. doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2022.103394

74-22 Vasilios Fourlakidis, Ilia Belov, Attila Diószeg, Experimental model of the pearlite interlamellar spacing in lamellar graphite iron, Tecnologia em Metalurgia, Materiais e Mineração, 19; e2634, 2022. doi.org/10.4322/2176-1523.20222634

71-22 M. G. Mahmoud, Amr Abdelghany, Serag Salem, Numerical simulation of door lock plates castings produced by high pressure die casting process, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2022. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-022-00797-7

70-22 Andreas Schilling, Daniel Schmidt, Jakob Glück, Niklas Schwenke, Husam Sharabi, Martin Fehlbier, About the impact on gravity cast salt cores in high pressure die casting and rheocasting, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 119; 102585, 2022. doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102585

52-22 Manthan Dhisale, Jitesh Vasavada, Asim Tewari, An approach to optimize cooling channel parameters of low pressure die casting process for reducing shrinkage porosity in aluminium alloy wheels, Materials Today: Proceedings, in print, 2022. doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.478

44-22 Zihan Lang, Feng Wang, Wei Wang, Zhi Wang, Le Zhou, Pingli Mao, Zheng Liu, Numerical simulation and experimental study on semi-solid forming process of 319s aluminum alloy test bar, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2022. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-022-00788-8

32-22 Elisa Fracchia, Federico Simone Gobber, Claudio Mus, Raul Pirovino, Mario Russo, The local squeeze technology for challenging aluminium HPDC automotive components, Light Metals, pp. 772-778, 2022. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92529-1_102

141-21 O. Ayer, O. Kaya, Mould design optimisation by FEM, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2130; 012021, 2021. doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2130/1/012021

117-21 I. Rajkumar, N. Rajini, T. Ram Prabhu, Sikiru O. Ismail, Suchart Siengchin, Faruq Mohammad, Hamad A. Al-Lohedan , Applicability of angular orientations of gating designs to quality of sand casting components using two-cavity mould set-up, Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02434-z

106-21 M. Ahmed, E. Riedel, M. Kovalko, A. Volochko, R. Bähr, A. Nofal, Ultrafine ductile and austempered ductile irons by solidification in ultrasonic field, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00683-8

97-21 J. Glueck, A. Schilling, N. Schwenke, A. Fros, M.Fehlbier, Efficiency and agility of a liquid CO2 cooling system for molten metal systems, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 28; 101485, 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101485

82-21 Giulia Scampone, Raul Pirovano, Stefano Mascetti, Giulio Timelli, Experimental and numerical investigations of oxide-related defects in Al alloy gravity die castings, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 117; pp. 1765-1780, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07680-5

74-21 Shuyang Ren, Feng Wang, Jingying Sun, Zheng Liu, Pingli Mao, Gating system design based on numerical simulation and production experiment verification of aluminum alloy bracket fabricated by semi-solid rheo-die casting process, International Journal of Metalcasting, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00648-x

69-21 Ozen Gursoy, Murat Colak, Kazim Tur, Derya Dispinar, Characterization of properties of Vanadium, Boron and Strontium addition on HPDC of A360 alloy, Materials Chemistry and Physics, 271; 124931, 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124931

54-21 K. Munpakdee, P. Ninpetch, S. Otarawanna, R. Canyook, P. Kowitwarangkul, Effect of feed sprue size on porosity defects in Platinum 950 centrifugal investment casting via numerical modelling, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 11th TSME-International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand, December 1-4, 2020, 1137; 012021, 2021. doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1137/1/012021/

44-21 Yunxiang Zhang, Haidong Zhao, Fei Liu, Microstructure characteristics and mechanical properties improvement of gravity cast Al-7Si-0.4Mg alloys with Zr additions, Materials Characterization, 176; 111117, 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111117

05-21 Heqian Song, Lunyong Zhang, Fuyang Cao, Xu Gu, Jianfei Sun, Oxide bifilm defects in aluminum alloy castings, Materials Letters, 285; 129089, 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.129089

127-20 Eric Riedel, Niklas Bergedieck, Stefan Scharf, CFD simulation based investigation of cavitation cynamics during high intensity ultrasonic treatment of A356, Metals, 10.11; 1529, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/met10111529

86-20 Malte Leonhard, Matthias Todte, Jörg Schäfer, Realistic simulation of the combustion of exothermic feeders, Modern Casting, August 2020; pp. 35-40, 2020. (See also 58-19)

52-20 Mingfan Qi, Yonglin Kang, Jingyuan Li, Zhumabieke Wulabieke, Yuzhao Xu, Yangde Li, Aisen Liu, Junchen Chen, Microstructures refinement and mechanical properties enhancement of aluminum and magnesium alloys by combining distributary-confluence channel process for semisolid slurry preparation with high pressure die-casting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 285; 116800, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116800

46-20 Yasushi Iwata, Shuxin Dong, Yoshio Sugiyama, Jun Yaokawa, Melt permeability changes during solidification of aluminum alloys and application to feeding simulation for die castings, Materials Transactions, 61.7; pp. 1381-1386, 2020. doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.F-M2020822

45-20 Daniel Bernal, Xabier Chamorro, Iñaki Hurtado, Iñaki Madariaga, Effect of boron content and cooling rate on the microstructure and boride formation of β-solidifying γ-TiAl TNM alloy, Metals, 10.5; 698, 2020. doi.org/10.3390/met10050698

72-19 Santosh Reddy Sama, Eric Macdonald, Robert Voigt, and Guha Manogharan, Measurement of metal velocity in sand casting during mold filling, Metals, 9:1079, 2019. doi:10.3390/met9101079

58-19 Von Malte Leonhard, Matthias Todte, and Jörg Schäffer, Realistic simulation of the combustion of exothermic feeders, Casting, No. 2, pp. 28-32, 2019. In English and German.

25-19 Stefano Mascetti, Raul Pirovano, and Giulio Timelli, Interazione metallo liquido/stampo: Il fenomeno della metallizzazione, La Metallurgia Italiana, No. 4, pp. 44-50, 2019. In Italian.

20-19 Fu-Yuan Hsu, Campbellology for runner system design, Shape Casting: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series, pp. 187-199, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_19

64-18 Vasilios Fourlakidis, Ilia Belov and Attila Diószegi, Strength prediction for pearlitic lamellar graphite iron: Model validation, Metals, Vol. 8, No. 9, 2018. doi: 10.3390/met8090684

100-16 Robert Watson, New numerical techniques to quantify and predict the effect of entrainment defects, applied to high pressure die casting, PhD Thesis: University of Birmingham, 2016.

59-16 R. Pirovano and S. Mascetti, Tracking of collapsed bubbles during a filling simulation, La Metallurgia Italiana – n. 6 2016

35-16 Konstantinos Salonitis, Mark Jolly, Binxu Zeng, and Hamid Mehrabi, Improvements in energy consumption and environmental impact by novel single shot melting process for casting, Journal of Cleaner Production, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.165, Open Access funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, June 29, 2016

20-16 Fu-Yuan Hsu, Bifilm Defect Formation in Hydraulic Jump of Liquid Aluminum, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2016, Band: 47, Heft 3, 1634-1648.

112-15 José Miguel Gonçalves Ledo Belo da Costa, Optimization of filling systems for low pressure by FLOW-3D, Dissertação de mestrado integrado em Engenharia Mecânica, http://hdl.handle.net/1822/40132, 2015

89-15 B.W. Zhu, L.X. Li, X. Liu, L.Q. Zhang and R. Xu, Effect of Viscosity Measurement Method to Simulate High Pressure Die Casting of Thin-Wall AlSi10MnMg Alloy Castings, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Published online, November 2015, DOI: 10.1007/s11665-015-1783-8, © ASM International.

83-15 Zu-Qi Hu, Xin-Jian Zhang and Shu-Sen Wu, Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Die-Filling Behavior of High-Performance Die-Cast Al–Mg–Si–Mn Alloy, Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), DOI 10.1007/s40195-015-0332-7, © The Chinese Society for Metals and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015.

69-15 A. Viswanath, S. Sivaraman, U. T. S. Pillai, Computer Simulation of Low Pressure Casting Process Using FLOW-3D, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 830-831, pp. 45-48, September 2015

68-15 J. Aneesh Kumar, K. Krishnakumar and S. Savithri, Computer Simulation of Centrifugal Casting Process Using FLOW-3D, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 830-831, pp. 53-56, September 2015

59-15 F. Hosseini Yekta and S. A. Sadough Vanini, Simulation of the flow of semi-solid steel alloy using an enhanced model, Metals and Materials International, August 2015.

44-15 Ulrich E. Klotz, Tiziana Heiss and Dario Tiberto, Platinum investment casting material properties, casting simulation and optimum process parameters, Jewelry Technology Forum 2015

41-15 M. Barkhudarov and R. Pirovano, Minimizing Air Entrainment in High Pressure Die Casting Shot Sleeves, GIFA 2015, Düsseldorf, Germany

40-15 M. Todte, A. Fent, and H. Lang, Simulation in support of the development of innovative processes in the casting industry, GIFA 2015, Düsseldorf, Germany

19-15 Bruce Morey, Virtual casting improves powertrain design, Automotive Engineering, SAE International, March 2015.

15-15 K.S. Oh, J.D. Lee, S.J. Kim and J.Y. Choi, Development of a large ingot continuous caster, Metall. Res. Technol. 112, 203 (2015) © EDP Sciences, 2015, DOI: 10.1051/metal/2015006, www.metallurgical-research.org

99-14 R. Bhola and S. Chandra, Predicting Castability for Thin-Walled HPDC Parts, Foundry Management Technology, December 2014

69-14 L. Xue, M.C. Carter, A.V. Catalina, Z. Lin, C. Li, and C. Qiu, Predicting, Preventing Core Gas Defects in Steel Castings, Modern Casting, September 2014

20-14 Johannes Hartmann, Tobias Fiegl, Carolin Körner, Aluminum integral foams with tailored density profile by adapted blowing agents, Applied Physics A, 10.1007/s00339-014-8377-4, March 2014.

08-14 FY Hsu, SW Wang, and HJ Lin, The External and Internal Shrinkages in Aluminum Gravity Castings, Shape Casting: 5th International Symposium 2014. Available online at Google Books

90-13 A. Karwińskia, M. Małyszaa, A. Tchórza, A. Gila, B. Lipowska, Integration of Computer Tomography and Simulation Analysis in Evaluation of Quality of Ceramic-Carbon Bonded Foam Filter, Archives of Foundry Engineering, DOI: 10.2478/afe-2013-0084, Published quarterly as the organ of the Foundry Commission of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ISSN, (2299-2944), Volume 13, Issue 4/2013

35-13 A. Pari, Real Life Problem Solving through Simulations in the Die Casting Industry – Case Studies, © Die Casting Engineer, July 2013.

34-13 Martin Lagler, Use of Simulation to Predict the Viability of Salt Cores in the HPDC Process – Shot Curve as a Decisive Criterion, © Die Casting Engineer, July 2013.

24-13 I.N.Volnov, Optimizatsia Liteynoi Tekhnologii, (Casting Technology Optimization), Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), 3, 2013, 27-29. In Russian

91-12 Hong Yan, Jian Bin Zhu, Ping Shan, Numerical Simulation on Rheo-Diecasting of Magnesium Matrix Composites, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.192-193.287, Solid State Phenomena, 192-193, 287.

76-12 A. Reikher and H. Gerber, Analysis of Solidification Parameters During the Die Cast Process, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, © NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

75-12 R.A. Miller, Y. Wang and K. Kabiri-Bamoradian, Estimating Cavity Fill Time, 2012 Die Casting Congress & Exposition, © NADCA, October 8-10, 2012, Indianapolis, IN.

44-12 Antoni Drys and Stefano Mascetti, Aluminum Casting Simulations, Desktop Engineering, September 2012

27-12 E Kaschnitz, Numerical simulation of centrifugal casting of pipes, 2012 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 33 012031, Issue 1. Full paper available at IOP.

07-12 Amir H. G. Isfahani and James M. Brethour, Simulating Thermal Stresses and Cooling Deformations, Die Casting Engineer, March 2012

104-11 Fu-Yuan Hsu and Huey Jiuan Lin, Foam Filters Used in Gravity Casting, Metall and Materi Trans B (2011) 42: 1110. doi:10.1007/s11663-011-9548-8.

76-11 J. Hartmann, A. Trepper, and C. Körner, Aluminum Integral Foams with Near-Microcellular Structure, Advanced Engineering Materials 2011, Volume 13 (2011) No. 11, © Wiley-VCH

65-11 V.A. Chaikin, A.V. Chaikin, I.N.Volnov, A Study of the Process of Late Modification Using Simulation, in Zagotovitelnye Proizvodstva v Mashinostroenii, 10, 2011, 8-12. In Russian.

51-11 A. Reikher and H. Gerber, Calculation of the Die Cast parameters of the Thin Wall Aluminum Cast Part, 2011 Die Casting Congress & Tabletop, Columbus, OH, September 19-21, 2011

27-11 A. Pari, Optimization of HPDC Process using Flow Simulation Case Studies, Die Casting Engineer, July 2011

26-11 A. Reikher, H. Gerber, Calculation of the Die Cast Parameters of the Thin Wall Aluminum Die Casting Part, Die Casting Engineer, July 2011

08-11 Hai Peng Li, Chun Yong Liang, Li Hui Wang, Hong Shui Wang, Numerical Simulation of Casting Process for Gray Iron Butterfly Valve, Advanced Materials Research, 189-193, 260, February 2011.

04-11 C.W. Hirt, Predicting Core Shooting, Drying and Defect Development, Foundry Management & Technology, January 2011.

68-10 A. Reikher, H. Gerber, K.M. Pillai, T.-C. Jen, Natural Convection—An Overlooked Phenomenon of the Solidification Process, Die Casting Engineer, January 2010

47-10 A.V. Chaikin, I.N. Volnov, and V.A. Chaikin, Development of Dispersible Mixed Inoculant Compositions Using the FLOW-3D Program, Liteinoe Proizvodstvo, October, 2010, in Russian.

41-10 Pamela J. Waterman, Understanding Core-Gas Defects, Desktop Engineering, October 2010. Available online at Desktop Engineering. Also published in the Foundry Trade Journal, November 2010.

37-10 Morris Murray, Lars Feldager Hansen, and Carl Reinhardt, I Have Defects – Now What, Die Casting Engineer, September 2010

27-10 For an Aerospace Diecasting, Littler Uses Simulation to Reveal Defects, and Win a New Order, Foundry Management & Technology, July 2010

23-10 Michael R. Barkhudarov, Minimizing Air Entrainment, The Canadian Die Caster, June 2010

09-10 Shannon Wetzel, Fullfilling Da Vinci’s Dream, Modern Casting, April 2010.

08-10 B.I. Semenov, K.M. Kushtarov, Semi-solid Manufacturing of Castings, New Industrial Technologies, Publication of Moscow State Technical University n.a. N.E. Bauman, 2009 (in Russian)

07-10 Carl Reilly, Development Of Quantitative Casting Quality Assessment Criteria Using Process Modelling, thesis: The University of Birmingham, March 2010 (Available upon request)

06-10 A. Pari, Optimization of HPDC Process using Flow Simulation – Case Studies, CastExpo ’10, NADCA, Orlando, Florida, March 2010

04-10 Pamela Waterman, Simulating Porosity Factors, Foundry Management Technology, March 2010, Article available at Foundry Management Technology

56-09 Jozef Kasala, Ondrej Híreš, Rudolf Pernis, Start-up Phase Modeling of Semi Continuous Casting Process of Brass Billets, Metal 2009, 19.-21.5.2009

21-09 A. Pari, Case Studies – Optimization of HPDC Process Using Flow Simulation, Die Casting Engineer, July 2009

20-09 M. Sirvio, M. Wos, Casting directly from a computer model by using advanced simulation software, FLOW-3D Cast, Archives of Foundry Engineering Volume 9, Issue 1/2009, 79-82

11-09 Michael Barkhudarov, Minimizing Air Entrainment in a Shot Sleeve during Slow-Shot Stage, Die Casting Engineer (The North American Die Casting Association ISSN 0012-253X), May 2009

6-09 A.Pari, Optimization of HPDC PROCESS: Case Studies, North American Die Casting Association – 113th Metalcasting Congress, April 7-10, 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

2-09 C. Reilly, N.R. Green and M.R. Jolly, Oxide Entrainment Structures in Horizontal Running Systems, TMS 2009, San Francisco, California, February 2009

22-08 Mark Littler, Simulation Eliminates Die Casting Scrap, Modern Casting/September 2008

20-08 Rolf Krack, Using Solidification Simulations for Optimising Die Cooling Systems, FTJ July/August 2008

19-08 Mark Littler, Simulation Software Eliminates Die Casting Scrap, ECS Casting Innovations, July/August 2008

08-08 Stephen Instone, Andreas Buchholz and Gerd-Ulrich Gruen, Inclusion Transport Phenomena in Casting Furnaces, Light Metals 2008, TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), 2008

07-08 P. Scarber, Jr., H. Littleton, Simulating Macro-Porosity in Aluminum Lost Foam Casting, AFS Transactions 2008 © American Foundry Society, CastExpo ’08, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2008

06-08 A. Reikher, H. Gerber and A. Starobin, Multi-Stage Plunger Deceleration System, CastExpo ’08, NADCA, Atlanta, Georgia, May 2008

27-07 A.Y. Korotchenko, A.M. Zarubin, I.A.Korotchenko, Modeling of High Pressure Die Casting Filling, Russian Foundryman, December 2007, pp 15-19. (in Russian)

26-07 I.N. Volnov, Modeling of Casting Processes with Variable Geometry, Russian Foundryman, November 2007, pp 27-30. (in Russian)

11-07 Marco Actis Grande, Computer Simulation of the Investment Casting Process – Widening of the Filling Step, Santa Fe Symposium on Jewelry Manufacturing Technology, May 2007

09-07 Alexandre Reikher and Michael Barkhudarov, Casting: An Analytical Approach, Springer, 1st edition, August 2007, Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-84628-849-4. U.S. Order Form; Europe Order Form.

07-07 I.N. Volnov, Casting Modeling Systems – Current State, Problems and Perspectives, (in Russian), Liteyshik Rossii (Russian Foundryman), June 2007

7-06 M.Y.Smirnov, Y.V.Golenkov, Manufacturing of Cast Iron Bath Tubs Castings using Vacuum-Process in Russia, Russia’s Foundryman, July 2006. In Russian.

1-06 Michael Barkhudarov, Using Simulation to Control Microporosity Reduces Die Iterations, Die Casting Engineer, January 2006, pp. 52-54

30-05 H. Xue, K. Kabiri-Bamoradian, R.A. Miller, Modeling Dynamic Cavity Pressure and Impact Spike in Die Casting, Cast Expo ’05, April 16-19, 2005

18-05 M.R. Jolly, Modelling the Investment Casting Process: Problems and Successes, Japanese Foundry Society, JFS, Tokyo, Sept. 2005

10-05 Carlos Evaristo Esparza, Martha P. Guerro-Mata, Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado, Optimal Design of Gating Systems by Gradient Search Methods, Computational Materials Science, October 2005

6-05 Birgit Hummler-Schaufler, Fritz Hirning, Jurgen Schaufler, A World First for Hatz Diesel and Schaufler Tooling, Die Casting Engineer, May 2005, pp. 18-21

4-05 Rolf Krack, The W35 Topic—A World First, Die Casting World, March 2005, pp. 16-17

3-05 Joerg Frei, Casting Simulations Speed Up Development, Die Casting World, March 2005, p. 14

32-04 D.H. Kirkwood and P.J Ward, Numerical Modelling of Semi-Solid Flow under Processing Conditions, steel research int. 75 (2004), No. 8/9

30-04 Haijing Mao, A Numerical Study of Externally Solidified Products in the Cold Chamber Die Casting Process, thesis: The Ohio State University, 2004 (Available upon request)

28-04 Z. Cao, Z. Yang, and X.L. Chen, Three-Dimensional Simulation of Transient GMA Weld Pool with Free Surface, Supplement to the Welding Journal, June 2004.

22-04 Jerry Fireman, Computer Simulation Helps Reduce Scrap, Die Casting Engineer, May 2004, pp. 46-49

21-04 Joerg Frei, Simulation—A Safe and Quick Way to Good Components, Aluminium World, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 42-43

13-04 Sayavur I. Bakhtiyarov and Ruel A. Overfelt, First V-Process Casting of Magnesium, American Foundry Society, 108th Casting Congress, June 12-15, 2004, Rosemont, IL, USA

5-04 C. Schlumpberger & B. Hummler-Schaufler, Produktentwicklung auf hohem Niveau (Product Development on a High Level), Druckguss Praxis, January 2004, pp 39-42 (in German).

3-04 Charles Bates, Dealing with Defects, Foundry Management and Technology, February 2004, pp 23-25

29-03 C. W. Hirt, Modeling Shrinkage Induced Micro-porosity, Flow Science Technical Note (FSI-03-TN66)

28-03 Thixoforming at the University of Sheffield, Diecasting World, September 2003, pp 11-12

26-03 William Walkington, Gas Porosity-A Guide to Correcting the Problems, NADCA Publication: 516

12-03 J-C Gebelin & M.R. Jolly, Modeling Filters in Light Alloy Casting Processes, Trans AFS, 2002, 110, pp. 109-120

11-03 M.R. Jolly, Casting Simulation – How Well Do Reality and Virtual Casting Match – A State of the Art Review, Intl. J. Cast Metals Research, 2002, 14, pp. 303-313

10-03 Gebelin., J-C and Jolly, M.R., Modeling of the Investment Casting Process, Journal of Materials Processing Tech., Vol. 135/2-3, pp. 291 – 300

9-03 Cox, M, Harding, R.A. and Campbell, J., Optimised Running System Design for Bottom Filled Aluminium Alloy 2L99 Investment Castings, J. Mat. Sci. Tech., May 2003, Vol. 19, pp. 613-625

8-03 Von Alexander Schrey and Regina Reek, Numerische Simulation der Kernherstellung, (Numerical Simulation of Core Blowing), Giesserei, June 2003, pp. 64-68 (in German)

21-02 Boris Lukezic, Case History: Process Modeling Solves Die Design Problems, Modern Casting, February 2003, P 59

20-02 C.W. Hirt and M.R. Barkhudarov, Predicting Defects in Lost Foam Castings, Modern Casting, December 2002, pp 31-33

19-02 Mark Jolly, Mike Cox, Ric Harding, Bill Griffiths and John Campbell, Quiescent Filling Applied to Investment Castings, Modern Casting, December 2002 pp. 36-38

18-02 Simulation Helps Overcome Challenges of Thin Wall Magnesium Diecasting, Foundry Management and Technology, October 2002, pp 13-15

17-02 G Messmer, Simulation of a Thixoforging Process of Aluminum Alloys with FLOW-3D, Institute for Metal Forming Technology, University of Stuttgart

16-02 Barkhudarov, Michael, Computer Simulation of Lost Foam Process, Casting Simulation Background and Examples from Europe and the USA, World Foundrymen Organization, 2002, pp 319-324

15-02 Barkhudarov, Michael, Computer Simulation of Inclusion Tracking, Casting Simulation Background and Examples from Europe and the USA, World Foundrymen Organization, 2002, pp 341-346

7-02 A Habibollah Zadeh, and J Campbell, Metal Flow Through a Filter System, University of Birmingham, 2002 American Foundry Society, AFS Transactions 02-020, Kansas City, MO

6-02 Phil Ward, and Helen Atkinson, Final Report for EPSRC Project: Modeling of Thixotropic Flow of Metal Alloys into a Die, GR/M17334/01, March 2002, University of Sheffield

4-02 J. C. Gebelin and M. R. Jolly, Modelling Filters in Light Alloy Casting Processes, University of Birmingham, 2002 American Foundry Society AFS Transactions 02-079, Kansas City, MO

26-01 C. W. Hirt., Predicting Defects in Lost Foam Castings, December 13, 2001

5-01 Michael Barkhudarov, Simulation Helps Overcome Challenges of Thin Wall Magnesium Diecasting, Diecasting World, March 2001, pp. 5-6

2-01 J. Grindling, Customized CFD Codes to Simulate Casting of Thermosets in Full 3D, Electrical Manufacturing and Coil Winding 2000 Conference, October 31-November 2, 20

15-00 M. Sirvio, Vainola, J. Vartianinen, M. Vuorinen, J. Orkas, and S. Devenyi, Fluid Flow Analysis for Designing Gating of Aluminum Castings, Proc. NADCA Conf., Rosemont, IL, Nov 6-8, 1999

13-00 H. S. H. Lo and J. Campbell, The Modeling of Ceramic Foam Filters, Conference for Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes IX, Aachen, Germany, August 2000

10-99 Bongcheol Park and Jerald R. Brevick, Computer Flow Modeling of Cavity Pre-fill Effects in High Pressure Die Casting, NADCA Proceedings, Cleveland T99-011, November, 1999

8-99 Brad Guthrie, Simulation Reduces Aluminum Die Casting Cost by Reducing Volume, Die Casting Engineer Magazine, September/October 1999, pp. 78-81

7-99 Fred L. Church, Virtual Reality Predicts Cast Metal Flow, Modern Metals, September, 1999, pp. 67F-J

18-98 X. Yang & J. Campbell, Liquid Metal Flow in a Pouring Basin, Int. J. Cast Metals Res, 1998, 10, pp. 239-253

15-98 R. Van Tol, Mould Filling of Horizontal Thin-Wall Castings, Delft University Press, The Netherlands, 1998

9-98 M. R. Barkhudarov and C. W. Hirt, Tracking Defects, Flow Science Inc, presented at the 1st International Aluminum Casting Technology Symposium, 12-14 October 1998, Rosemont, IL

5-98 J. Righi, Computer Simulation Helps Eliminate Porosity, Die Casting Management Magazine, pp. 36-38, January 1998

8-97 Michael Barkhudarov, High Pressure Die Casting Simulation Using FLOW-3D, Die Casting Engineer, 1997

13-97 J. Koke, Modellierung und Simulation der Fließeigenschaften teilerstarrter Metallegierungen, Livt Information, Institut für Verfahrenstechnik, RWTH Aachen, October 1997

6-97 M. R. Barkhudarov, Is Fluid Flow Important for Predicting Solidification, Flow Science report, presented at the Solidification Processing ’97 Conference, July 7-10, 1997, Sheffield, U.K.

22-96 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich & Schneider, Wolfgang, 3-D Modeling of the Start-up Phase of DC Casting of Sheet Ingots, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1996, pp. 971-981

4-96 C. W. Hirt, A Computational Model for the Lost Foam Process, Flow Science final report, February 1996 (FSI-96-57-R2)

10-95 Grun, Gerd-Ulrich, & Schneider, Wolfgang, Optimal Design of a Distribution Pan for Level Pour Casting, Proc TMS Annual Meeting, 1995, pp. 1061-1070

2-95 K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Simulation and Comparison with Water Modeling Studies of the Inertia Dominated Cavity Filling in Die Casting, NUMIFORM, 1995

1-95 K. Venkatesan and R. Shivpuri, Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Gate Velocity and Gate Size on the Quality of Die Casting Parts, NAMRC, 1995.

12-92 M. A. K. Lewis, Near-Net-Shaiconpe Casting Simulation and Experimentation, MST 1992 Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory

11-90 N. Saluja, O.J. Ilegbusi, and J. Szekely, On the Calculation of the Electromagnetic Force Field in the Circular Stirring of Metallic Melts, accepted in J. Appl. Physics, 1990

8-89 C. W. Hirt, Gravity-Fed Casting, Flow Science Technical Note #20, July 1989 (FSI-89-TN20)

1-88 C. W. Hirt and R. P. Harper, Modeling Tests for Casting Processes, Flow Science report, Jan. 1988 (FSI-88-38-01)

2-87 C. W. Hirt, Addition of a Solidification/Melting Model to FLOW-3D, Flow Science report, April 1987 (FSI-87-33-1)

Real-World Validations

실제 산업현장에서의 검증

FLOW-3D 의 고객들은 끊임없이 자신의 설계 및 제조 공정을 개선하기 위하여 시뮬레이션을 사용한 결과와 실제를 비교 검증을 하고 있습니다.

Ladle Pour Simulation

Shot sleeve 공정을 최적화하는 것은 제품 품질을 보장하는 데 매우 중요합니다. FLOW-3D의 시뮬레이션 결과와 실제 사례 간의 비교는 시뮬레이션을 사용하여 엔지니어가 고가의 금형을 제조하기 전에 디자인을 향상시킬 수 있는 방법을 강조합니다. FLOW-3D의 GMO 기능을 이용하여 사용자는 전체 공정을 따라 실제 ladle로부터 fast shot까지 유체의 움직임을 정확하게 포착 할 수 있습니다. Simulation courtesy of Mr. Antoni Drys from Nemak Poland Sp. z o.o

Gravity Casting Validation

A gravity casting simulation compared with the reconstruction of the real filling, based on thermocoupled data. Courtesy of XC Engineering and Peugeot PSA.

Foundry: Simulating a Flow Fill Pattern

X 레이 사진 및 FLOW-3D 충전 시뮬레이션 비교표입니다. A356 알루미늄 합금으로의 사형 주형의 3 차원 중력 충진양상이고, legend 색은 용탕의 압력입니다. 시뮬레이션 결과는 대칭의 수직면에 나타나고 있습니다. X-rays courtesy of Modeling of Casting, Welding, and Advanced Solidification Processes VII, London, 1995.

X-ray validation of a sand mold filling

HPDC: Flow Pattern

Short shot compared to simulation results show good correlation. Courtesy of Littler Diecast Corporation.

Short sleeve validation – simulation versus casting part

HPDC Validation Showing Air Entrapment Defects

FLOW-3D의 Air Entrapment model을 사용하여 나온 시뮬레이션과 실험결과를 보여줍니다. 이는 세탁기 용 전동 모터에 대한 프론트 커버의 HPDC 결과입니다. 공기 관련 결함은 이미지의 컬러 형태로 정성적으로 표시됩니다. FLOW-3D 내의 다른 수치 기능에 의해 물리적인 air pocket도 명확하게 포착됩니다.

Successful comparison of casting simulation versus experimental results courtesy of Antrametal.

Modeling Air Entrapment

디젤 엔진 용 오일 필터 하우징(380 다이 캐스트 합금.)의 X 선 검증 사례입니다. X 선에 대한 자세한 영역은 최대 porosity concentration를 나타냅니다.

X-ray vs. FLOW-3D Cast validation of an oil filter housing for a diesel engine.

Simulation vs. Short Shot

Validation snapshots of actual casting parts vs. FLOW-3D simulations. From left to right: A transmission housing, an oil pan and an auto part.

Validating a High Pressure Die Casting Filling

HPDC casting validation comparing FLOW-3D results to the actual part

Predicting Die Erosion

The area of die erosion due to cavitation was correctly located in a comparison of FLOW-3D results to a real-world case.

Core Drying Validation

A comparison made by BMW between simulation and experiment of the drying of an inorganic core.

Predicting Lost Foam Filling

Comparison of real time X-ray and FLOW-3D metal flow simulation results on a lost foam L850 Block Bulkhead Slice. Simulation courtesy of GM Powertrain.

Air Entrapment Defects (공기혼입, 기포결함)

FLOW-3D 내의 Air entrapment model은 충진 동안 금형내에서 혼입되는 공기의 양을 추정하기 위해 사용됩니다. 이 모델은 기본적인 물리적 메커니즘을 기반으로 하고 있으며 정확한 미세기포의 예측이 가능합니다. 고속으로 분사되는 용탕과 공기의 혼합을 예측하는 모델로 사용자는 공기 혼입 결함을 방지하기 위한 시뮬레이션을 수행할 수 있으며, 여러 시행 착오 과정을 줄일 수 있습니다. Air entrapment model에 대한 자세한 내용은 모델링 기능 섹션을 방문하십시오.

: A support arm cast in A380, colored by air entrainment. Courtesy of Littler Diecast Co.

: A front gear housing, 380 die cast alloy, colored by percent of entrained air. Courtesy of Shiloh Industries.

: 4 simulation cases of the Caster Wheel Leg part. These parts are made of Zinc alloy #5. Courtesy of Deco Products.

Tag: Air Entrapment

키워드

Executive Summary

도전 과제: 왜 이 연구가 CFD 전문가에게 중요한가?

접근 방식: 연구 방법론 분석

핵심 성과: 주요 발견 및 데이터

성과 1: 니야마 기준을 통한 통합 결함 제어 가능성 입증

성과 2: MOGA 기반 최적화로 다중 결함 감소 및 수율 향상 동시 달성

R&D 및 운영을 위한 실질적인 시사점

논문 정보

Integrated Modeling of Process, Structures and Performance in Cast Parts

1. 개요:

2. 초록:

3. 서론:

4. 연구 요약:

연구 주제의 배경:

이전 연구 현황:

연구 목적:

핵심 연구:

5. 연구 방법론

연구 설계:

데이터 수집 및 분석 방법:

연구 주제 및 범위:

6. 주요 결과:

주요 결과:

Figure List:

7. 결론:

8. 참고문헌:

전문가 Q&A: 주요 질문과 답변

결론: 더 높은 품질과 생산성을 향한 길

저작권 정보

주기적 토폴로지를 가진 셀룰러 알루미늄 제작을 위한 복제 주조 및 적층 제조: CFD 시뮬레이션을 통한 최적화

연구 목적

연구 방법

주요 결과

결론

Reference

두꺼운 접착제 실링의 스텐실 인쇄 중 스퀴지 프로세스에 대한 실험적 및 수치적 조사

ABSTRACT

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Stencil design

2.2. Adhesive selection and print parameters

2.3. Specimens characterisation

3. Experimental results and discussion

3.1. Incomplete regions

3.2. Bubble formation

4. Modelling approach

4.1. Model description and assumptions

4.2. Simulation results and validation

5. Sealing design with optimized print conditions

6. Conclusions

References

다양한 기질 수준 변화를 갖는 침식성 층 위의 댐 파손 흐름에 대한 수치 조사

Abstract

Keywords

REFERENCES

Air Entrapment

Core Gas Defects

Die Erosion Defects

Microporosity

Solidification & Shrinkage

Surface Oxides

Thermal Stress Defect Prediction

공기 갇힘 / Air Entrapment

고객 사례

Microfluidics Bibliography

Coating Bibliography

Ladle Pour Simulation

Gravity Casting Validation

Foundry: Simulating a Flow Fill Pattern

HPDC: Flow Pattern

HPDC Validation Showing Air Entrapment Defects

Modeling Air Entrapment

Simulation vs. Short Shot

Validating a High Pressure Die Casting Filling

Predicting Die Erosion

Core Drying Validation

Predicting Lost Foam Filling