Figure 5: 3D & 2D views of simulated fill sequence of a hollow cylinder at 1000 rpm and 1500 rpm at various time intervals during filling.

Computer Simulation of Centrifugal Casting Process using FLOW-3D

Aneesh Kumar J1, a, K. Krishnakumar1, b and S. Savithri2, c 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 2 Computational Modelling& Simulation Division, Process Engineering & Environmental Technology Division CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science & Technology
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
a aneesh82kj@gmail.com, b kkk@cet.ac.in, c sivakumarsavi@gmail.com, ssavithri@niist.res.in Key words: Mold filling, centrifugal casting process, computer simulation, FLOW- 3D™

Abstract

원심 주조 공정은 기능적으로 등급이 지정된 재료, 즉 구성 요소 간에 밀도 차이가 큰 복합 재료 또는 금속 재료를 생산하는 데 사용되는 잠재적인 제조 기술 중 하나입니다. 이 공정에서 유체 흐름이 중요한 역할을 하며 복잡한 흐름 공정을 이해하는 것은 결함 없는 주물을 생산하는 데 필수입니다. 금형이 고속으로 회전하고 금형 벽이 불투명하기 때문에 흐름 패턴을 실시간으로 시각화하는 것은 불가능합니다. 따라서 현재 연구에서는 상용 CFD 코드 FLOW-3D™를 사용하여 수직 원심 주조 공정 중 단순 중공 원통형 주조에 대한 금형 충전 시퀀스를 시뮬레이션했습니다. 수직 원심주조 공정 중 다양한 방사 속도가 충전 패턴에 미치는 영향을 조사하고 있습니다.

Centrifugal casting process is one of the potential manufacturing techniques used for producing functionally graded materials viz., composite materials or metallic materials which have high differences of density among constituents. In this process, the fluid flow plays a major role and understanding the complex flow process is a must for the production of defect-free castings. Since the mold spins at a high velocity and the mold wall being opaque, it is impossible to visualise the flow patterns in real time. Hence, in the present work, the commercial CFD code FLOW-3D™, has been used to simulate the mold filling sequence for a simple hollow cylindrical casting during vertical centrifugal casting process. Effect of various spinning velocities on the fill pattern during vertical centrifugal casting process is being investigated.

Figure 1: (a) Mold geometry and (b) Computational mesh
Figure 1: (a) Mold geometry and (b) Computational mesh
Figure 2: Experimental data on height of
vertex formed [8]  / Figure 3: Vertex height as a function of time
Figure 2: Experimental data on height of vertex formed [8]/Figure 3: Vertex height as a function of time
Figure 4: Free surface contours for water model at 10 s, 15 s and 20 s.
Figure 4: Free surface contours for water model at 10 s, 15 s and 20 s.
Figure 5: 3D & 2D views of simulated fill sequence of a hollow cylinder at 1000 rpm and 1500 rpm at various time intervals during filling.
Figure 5: 3D & 2D views of simulated fill sequence of a hollow cylinder at 1000 rpm and 1500 rpm at various time intervals during filling.

References

[1] W. Shi-Ping, L. Chang-yun, G. Jing-jie, S. Yan-qing, L. Xiu-qiao, F. Heng-zhi, Numerical simulation and
experimental investigation of two filling methods in vertical centrifugal casting, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc.
China 16 (2006) 1035-1040.
10.1016/s1003-6326(06)60373-7
[2] G. Chirita, D. Soares, F.S. Silva, Advantages of the centrifugal casting technique for the production of
structural components with Al-Si alloys, Mater. Des. 29 (2008) 20-27.
10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.011
[3] A. Kermanpur, Sh. Mahmoudi, A. Hajipour, Numerical simulation of metal flow and solidification in the
multi-cavity casting moulds of automotive components, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 206 (208) 62-68.
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.004
[4] D. McBride et. al. Complex free surface flows in centrifugal casting: Computational modelling and
validation experiments, Computers & Fluids 82 (2013) 63-72.
10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.04.021

Fig. 2 Modeling of bubble point test apparatus (left) and computational grid (righ

Flow-3d를 이용한 표면장력 탱크용메시스크린모델링

Modeling of Mesh Screen for Use in Surface TensionTankUsing Flow-3d Software

Hyuntak Kim․ Sang Hyuk Lim․Hosung Yoon․Jeong-Bae Park*․Sejin Kwon

ABSTRACT

Mesh screen modeling and liquid propellant discharge simulation of surface tension tank wereperformed using commercial CFD software Flow-3d. 350 × 2600, 400 × 3000 and 510 × 3600 DTW mesh screen were modeled using macroscopic porous media model. Porosity, capillary pressure, and drag
coefficient were assigned for each mesh screen model, and bubble point simulations were performed. The
mesh screen model was validated with the experimental data. Based on the screen modeling, liquidpropellant discharge simulation from PMD tank was performed. NTO was assigned as the liquidpropellant, and void was set to flow into the tank inlet to achieve an initial volume flowrate of
liquid propellant in 3 × 10-3 g acceleration condition. The intial flow pressure drop through the meshscreen was approximately 270 Pa, and the pressure drop increased with time. Liquid propellant
discharge was sustained until the flow pressure drop reached approximately 630 Pa, which was near
the estimated bubble point value of the screen model.

초 록

상용 CFD 프로그램 Flow-3d를 활용하여, 표면 장력 탱크 적용을 위한 메시 스크린의 모델링 및 추진제 배출 해석을 수행하였다. Flow-3d 내 거시적 다공성 매체 모델을 사용하였으며, 350 × 2600, 400× 3000, 510 × 3600 DTW 메시 스크린에 대한 공극률, 모세관압, 항력계수를 스크린 모델에 대입 후, 기포점 측정 시뮬레이션을 수행하였다.

시뮬레이션 결과를 실험 데이터와 비교하였으며, 메시 스크린 모델링의 적절성을 검증하였다. 이를 기반으로 스크린 모델을 포함한 PMD 구조체에 대한 추진제 배출 해석을 수행하였다. 추진제는 액상의 NTO를 가정하였으며, 3 × 10-3 g 가속 조건에서 초기 유량을만족하도록 void를 유입시켰다. 메시 스크린을 통한 차압은 초기 약 270 Pa에서 시간에 따라 증가하였으며, 스크린 모델의 예상 기포점과 유사한 630 Pa에 이르기까지 액상 추진제 배출을 지속하였다.

Key Words

Surface Tension Tank(표면장력 탱크), Propellant Management Device(추진제 관리 장치),
Mesh Screen(메시 스크린), Porous Media Model(다공성 매체 모델), Bubble Point(기포점)

서론

    우주비행체를 미소 중력 조건 내에서 운용하 는 경우, 가압 기체가 액상의 추진제와 혼합되어 엔진으로 공급될 우려가 있으므로 이를 방지하 기 위한 탱크의 설계가 필요하다.

    다이어프램 (Diaphragm), 피스톤(Piston) 등 다양한 장치들 이 활용되고 있으며, 이 중 표면 장력 탱크는 내 부의 메시 스크린(Mesh screen), 베인(Vane) 등 의 구조체에서 추진제의 표면장력을 활용함으로 써 액상 추진제의 이송 및 배출을 유도하는 방 식이다.

    표면 장력 탱크는 구동부가 없는 구조로 신뢰성이 높고, 전 부분을 티타늄 등의 금속 재 질로 구성함으로써 부식성 추진제의 사용 조건 에서도 장기 운용이 가능한 장점이 있다. 위에서 언급한 메시 스크린(Mesh screen)은 수 십 마이크로미터 두께의 금속 와이어를 직조한 다공성 재질로 표면 장력 탱크의 핵심 구성 요소 중 하나이다.

    미세 공극 상 추진제의 표면장력에 의해 기체와 액체 간 계면을 일정 차압 내에서 유지시킬 수 있다. 이러한 성질로 인해 일정 조 건에서 가압 기체가 메시 스크린을 통과하지 못 하게 되고, 스크린을 탱크 유로에 설치함으로써 액상의 추진제 배출을 유도할 수 있다.

    메시 스크린이 가압 기체를 통과시키기 직전 의 기체-액체 계면에 형성되는 최대 차압을 기포 점 (Bubble point) 이라 칭하며, 메시 스크린의 주 요 성능 지표 중 하나이다. IPA, 물, LH2, LCH4 등 다양한 기준 유체 및 추진제, 다양한 메시 스 크린 사양에 대해 기포점 측정 관련 실험적 연 구가 이루어져 왔다 [1-3].

    위 메시 스크린을 포함하여 표면 장력 탱크 내 액상의 추진제 배출을 유도하는 구조물 일체 를 PMD(Propellant management device)라 칭하 며, 갤러리(Gallery), 베인(Vane), 스펀지(Sponge), 트랩(Trap) 등 여러 종류의 구조물에 대해 각종 형상 변수를 내포한다[4, 5].

    따라서 다양한 파라미터를 고려한 실험적 연구는 제약이 따를 수 있으며, 베인 등 상대적으로 작은 미소 중력 조건에서 개방형 유로를 활용하는 경우 지상 추진제 배출 실험이 불가능하다[6]. 그러므로 CFD를 통한 표면장력 탱크 추진제 배출 해석은 다양한 작동 조건 및 PMD 형상 변수에 따른 추진제 거동을 이해하고, 탱크를 설계하는 데 유용하게 활용될 수 있다.

    상기 추진제 배출 해석을 수행하기 위해서는 핵심 요소 중 하나인 메시 스크린에 대한 모델링이 필수적이다. Chato, McQuillen 등은 상용 CFD 프로그램인 Fluent를 통해, 갤러리 내 유동 시뮬레이션을 수행하였으며, 이 때 메시 스크린에 ‘porous jump’ 경계 조건을 적용함으로써 액상의 추진제가 스크린을 통과할 때 생기는 압력 강하를 모델링하였다[7, 8].

    그러나 앞서 언급한 메시 스크린의 기포점 특성을 모델링한 사례는 찾아보기 힘들다. 이는 스크린을 활용하는 표면 장력 탱크 내 액상 추진제 배출 현상을 해석적으로 구현하기 위해 반드시 필요한 부분이다. 본 연구에서는 자유표면 해석에 상대적으로 강점을 지닌 상용 CFD 프로그램 Flow-3d를 사용하여, 메시 스크린을 모델링하였다.

    거시적 다공성 매체 모델(Macroscopic porous mediamodel)을 활용하여 메시 스크린 모델 영역에 공극률(Porosity), 모세관압(Capillary pressure), 항력 계수(Drag coefficient)를 지정하고, 이를 기반으로 기포점 측정 시뮬레이션을 수행, 해석 결과와 실험 데이터 간 비교 및 검증을 수행하였다.

    이를 기반으로 메시 스크린 및 PMD구조체를 포함한 탱크의 추진제 배출 해석을 수행하고, 기포점 특성의 반영 여부를 확인하였다.

    Fig. 1 Real geometry-based mesh screen model (left)
and mesh screen model based on macroscopic
porous media model in Flow-3d (righ
    Fig. 1 Real geometry-based mesh screen model (left) and mesh screen model based on macroscopic porous media model in Flow-3d (righ
    Fig. 2 Modeling of bubble point test apparatus (left)
and computational grid (righ
    Fig. 2 Modeling of bubble point test apparatus (left) and computational grid (righ)
    Fig. 3 Modeling of sump in a tank (left) and lower part
of the sump structure (right)
    Fig. 3 Modeling of sump in a tank (left) and lower part of the sump structure (right)

    참 고 문 헌

    1. David J. C and Maureen T. K, ScreenChannel Liquid Aquisition Devices for Cryogenic Propellants” NASA-TM-2005- 213638, 2005
    2. Hartwig, J., Mann, J. A. Jr., Darr, S. R., “Parametric Analysis of the LiquidHydrogen and Nitrogen Bubble Point Pressure for Cryogenic Liquid AcquisitionDevices”, Cryogenics, Vol. 63, 2014, pp. 25-36
    3. Jurns, J. M., McQuillen, J. B.,BubblePoint Measurement with Liquid Methane of a Screen Capillary Liquid AcquisitionDevice”, NASA-TM-2009-215496, 2009
    4. Jaekle, D. E. Jr., “Propellant Management Device: Conceptual Design and Analysis: Galleries”, AIAA 29th Joint PropulsionConference, AIAA-97-2811, 1997
    5. Jaekle, D. E. Jr., “Propellant Management Device: Conceptual Design and Analysis: Traps and Troughs”, AIAA 31th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-95-2531, 1995
    6. Yu, A., Ji, B., Zhuang, B. T., Hu, Q., Luo, X. W., Xu, H. Y., “Flow Analysis inaVane-type Surface Tension Propellant Tank”, IOP Conference Series: MaterialsScience and Engineering, Vol. 52, No. 7, – 990 – 2013, Article number: 072018
    7. Chato, D. J., McQuillen, J. B., Motil, B. J., Chao, D. F., Zhang, N., CFD simulation of Pressure Drops in Liquid Acquisition Device Channel with Sub-Cooled Oxygen”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, 2009, pp. 144-149
    8. McQuillen, J. B., Chao, D. F., Hall, N. R., Motil, B. J., Zhang, N., CFD simulation of Flow in Capillary Flow Liquid Acquisition Device Channel”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6, 2012, pp. 640-646
    9. Hartwig, J., Chato, D., McQuillen, J.,  Screen Channel LAD Bubble Point Tests in Liquid Hydrogen”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2014, pp. 853-861
    10. Fischer, A., Gerstmann, J., “Flow Resistance of Metallic Screens in Liquid, Gaseous and Cryogenic Flow”, 5th European Conferencefor Aeronautics and Space Sciences, Munich, Germany, 2013
    11. Fries, N., Odic, K., Dreyer, M., Wickingof Perfectly Wetting Liquids into a MetallicMesh”, 2nd International Conference onPorous Media and its Applications inScience and Engineering, 2007
    12. Seo, M, K., Kim, D, H., Seo, C, W., Lee, S, Y., Jang, S, P., Koo, J., “Experimental Study of Pressure Drop in CompressibleFluid through Porous Media”, Transactionsof the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers – B, Vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 759-765, 2013.
    13. Hartwig, J., Mann, J. A., “Bubble Point Pressures of Binary Methanol/Water Mixtures in Fine-Mesh Screens”, AlChEJournal, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2014, pp. 730-739
    Serife Yurdagul Kumcu−2−KSCE Journal of Civil Engineeringthe use of CFD for the assessment of a design, as well as screeningand optimizing of hydraulic structures and cofferdam layouts. Theyconclude that CFD has been successful in optimizing the finalconceptual configuration for the hydraulics design of the project,but recommend that physical modeling still be used as a finalconfirmation.This paper provides experimental studies performed on Kav akDam and analyses the stability of spillway design by usingFLOW-3D model. It compares the hydraulic model tests withFLOW-3D simulation results and gives information on howaccurately a commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamic(CFD) model can predict the spillway discharge capacity andpressure distribution along the spillway bottom surface. 2. Physical ModelA 1/50-scaled undistorted physical model of the Kavsak Damspillway and stilling basin was built and tested at the HydraulicModel Laboratory of State Hydraulic Works of Turkey (DSI).The model was constructed of plexiglas and was fabricated toconform to the distinctive shape of an ogee crest. The spillwayhas 45.8 m in width and 57 m long with a bottom slope of 125%.The length of the stilling basin is about 90 m. During model tests,flow velocities were measured with an ultrasonic flow meter.Pressures on the spillway were measured using a piezometerssçTable 1. Upstream and Downstream Operating Conditions of theKavsak DamRun Upstream reservoir elevation (m)Downstream tailwater elevation (m)1 306.55 168.002 311.35 174.503 314.00 178.904 316.50 182.55Fig. 1. (a) Original Project Design and Final Project Design after Experimental Investigations and Flow Measurement Sections at theApproach, (b) Top View Experimentally Modified Approach in the Laboratory, (c) Side View of the Experimentally Modified Approachin the Laboratory

    Investigation of flow over spillway modeling and comparison between experimental data and CFD analysis

    여수로 모델링 및 실험 데이터와 CFD 해석의 비교에 대한 조사

    DOI:10.1007/s12205-016-1257-z

    Authors:

    Serife Yurdagul Kumcu at Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi

    Serife Yurdagul Kumcu

    Abstract and Figures

    As a part of design process for hydro-electric generating stations, hydraulic engineers typically conduct some form of model testing. The desired outcome from the testing can vary considerably depending on the specific situation, but often characteristics such as velocity patterns, discharge rating curves, water surface profiles, and pressures at various locations are measured. Due to recent advances in computational power and numerical techniques, it is now also possible to obtain much of this information through numerical modeling. In this paper, hydraulic characteristics of Kavsak Dam and Hydroelectric Power Plant (HEPP), which are under construction and built for producing energy in Turkey, were investigated experimentally by physical model studies. The 1/50-scaled physical model was used in conducting experiments. Flow depth, discharge and pressure data were recorded for different flow conditions. Serious modification was made on the original project with the experimental study. In order to evaluate the capability of the computational fluid dynamics on modeling spillway flow a comparative study was made by using results obtained from physical modeling and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation. A commercially available CFD program, which solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, was used to model the numerical model setup by defining cells where the flow is partially or completely restricted in the computational space. Discharge rating curves, velocity patterns and pressures were used to compare the results of the physical model and the numerical model. It was shown that there is reasonably good agreement between the physical and numerical models in flow characteristics.

    수력 발전소 설계 프로세스의 일부로 수력 엔지니어는 일반적으로 어떤 형태의 모델 테스트를 수행합니다. 테스트에서 원하는 결과는 특정 상황에 따라 상당히 다를 수 있지만 속도 패턴, 방전 등급 곡선, 수면 프로파일 및 다양한 위치에서의 압력과 같은 특성이 측정되는 경우가 많습니다. 최근 계산 능력과 수치 기법의 발전으로 인해 이제는 수치 모델링을 통해 이러한 정보의 대부분을 얻을 수도 있습니다.

    본 논문에서는 터키에서 에너지 생산을 위해 건설 중인 Kavsak 댐과 수력발전소(HEPP)의 수력학적 특성을 물리적 모델 연구를 통해 실험적으로 조사하였다. 1/50 스케일의 물리적 모델이 실험 수행에 사용되었습니다. 다양한 흐름 조건에 대해 흐름 깊이, 배출 및 압력 데이터가 기록되었습니다. 실험 연구를 통해 원래 프로젝트에 대대적인 수정이 이루어졌습니다.

    배수로 흐름 모델링에 대한 전산유체역학의 능력을 평가하기 위해 물리적 모델링과 전산유체역학(CFD) 시뮬레이션 결과를 이용하여 비교 연구를 수행하였습니다. RANS(Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) 방정식을 푸는 상업적으로 이용 가능한 CFD 프로그램은 흐름이 계산 공간에서 부분적으로 또는 완전히 제한되는 셀을 정의하여 수치 모델 설정을 모델링하는 데 사용되었습니다.

    물리적 모델과 수치 모델의 결과를 비교하기 위해 배출 등급 곡선, 속도 패턴 및 압력을 사용했습니다. 유동 특성에서 물리적 모델과 수치 모델 간에 상당히 좋은 일치가 있는 것으로 나타났습니다.

    Serife Yurdagul Kumcu−2−KSCE Journal of Civil Engineeringthe use of CFD for the assessment of a design, as well as screeningand optimizing of hydraulic structures and cofferdam layouts. Theyconclude that CFD has been successful in optimizing the finalconceptual configuration for the hydraulics design of the project,but recommend that physical modeling still be used as a finalconfirmation.This paper provides experimental studies performed on Kav akDam and analyses the stability of spillway design by usingFLOW-3D model. It compares the hydraulic model tests withFLOW-3D simulation results and gives information on howaccurately a commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamic(CFD) model can predict the spillway discharge capacity andpressure distribution along the spillway bottom surface. 2. Physical ModelA 1/50-scaled undistorted physical model of the Kavsak Damspillway and stilling basin was built and tested at the HydraulicModel Laboratory of State Hydraulic Works of Turkey (DSI).The model was constructed of plexiglas and was fabricated toconform to the distinctive shape of an ogee crest. The spillwayhas 45.8 m in width and 57 m long with a bottom slope of 125%.The length of the stilling basin is about 90 m. During model tests,flow velocities were measured with an ultrasonic flow meter.Pressures on the spillway were measured using a piezometerssçTable 1. Upstream and Downstream Operating Conditions of theKavsak DamRun Upstream reservoir elevation (m)Downstream tailwater elevation (m)1 306.55 168.002 311.35 174.503 314.00 178.904 316.50 182.55Fig. 1. (a) Original Project Design and Final Project Design after Experimental Investigations and Flow Measurement Sections at theApproach, (b) Top View Experimentally Modified Approach in the Laboratory, (c) Side View of the Experimentally Modified Approachin the Laboratory
    Serife Yurdagul Kumcu−2−KSCE Journal of Civil Engineeringthe use of CFD for the assessment of a design, as well as screeningand optimizing of hydraulic structures and cofferdam layouts. Theyconclude that CFD has been successful in optimizing the finalconceptual configuration for the hydraulics design of the project,but recommend that physical modeling still be used as a finalconfirmation.This paper provides experimental studies performed on Kav akDam and analyses the stability of spillway design by usingFLOW-3D model. It compares the hydraulic model tests withFLOW-3D simulation results and gives information on howaccurately a commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamic(CFD) model can predict the spillway discharge capacity andpressure distribution along the spillway bottom surface. 2. Physical ModelA 1/50-scaled undistorted physical model of the Kavsak Damspillway and stilling basin was built and tested at the HydraulicModel Laboratory of State Hydraulic Works of Turkey (DSI).The model was constructed of plexiglas and was fabricated toconform to the distinctive shape of an ogee crest. The spillwayhas 45.8 m in width and 57 m long with a bottom slope of 125%.The length of the stilling basin is about 90 m. During model tests,flow velocities were measured with an ultrasonic flow meter.Pressures on the spillway were measured using a piezometerssçTable 1. Upstream and Downstream Operating Conditions of theKavsak DamRun Upstream reservoir elevation (m)Downstream tailwater elevation (m)1 306.55 168.002 311.35 174.503 314.00 178.904 316.50 182.55Fig. 1. (a) Original Project Design and Final Project Design after Experimental Investigations and Flow Measurement Sections at theApproach, (b) Top View Experimentally Modified Approach in the Laboratory, (c) Side View of the Experimentally Modified Approachin the Laboratory

    References

    Bureau of Reclamation (1977). Design of small dams, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., U.S.

    Bureau of Reclamation (1990). Cavitation in chute and spillways, Engineering Monograph, No.42, U.S. Chanel, P. G. (2008). An evaluation of computational fluid dynamics for

    spillway modeling, MSc Thesis, University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

    Chanson, H. (2002). The hydraulics of stepped chutes and spillways,Balkema, Lisse, The Netherlands.

    Chanson, H. and Gonzalez, C. A. (2005). “Physical modeling and scale effects of air-water flows on stepped spillways.” Journal of Zhejiang University Science, Vol. 6A, No. 3, pp. 243-250.

    Demiroz, E. (1986). “Specifications of aeration structures which are added to the spillways.” DSI Report, HI-754, DSI-TAKK Publications, Ankara, Turkey.

    Erfanain-Azmoudeh, M. H. and Kamanbedast, A. A. (2013). “Determine the appropriate location of aerator system on gotvandoliadam’s spillway using Flow 3D.” American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 378-383, DOI: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2013. 13.03. 458.

    Falvey, H. T. (1990). Cavitation in chutes and spillways, Engineering Monograph 42 Water Resources Technical Publication US Printing Office, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver.

    Flow-3D User ’s Manual (2012). Flow science, Inc., Santa Fe, N.M.

    Hirt, C. W. (1992). “Volume-fraction techniques: Powerful tools for flow

    modeling.” Flow Science Report, No. FSI-92-00-02, Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, N.M.

    Hirt C. W. and Nichols B. D. (1981). “Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.”Jornal of Computational Physics, Vol. 39, pp. 201-225, DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.

    Hirt, C. W. and Sicilian, J. M. (1985). “A Porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes.” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ship Hydro-dynamics, 24-27 September 1985, National Academic of Sciences, Washington DC.

    Ho, D., Boyes, K., Donohoo, S., and Cooper, B. (2003). “Numerical flow analysis for spillways.” 43rd ANCOLD Conference, Hobart, Tas m a nia .

    Johnson, M. C. and Savage, B. M. (2006). “Physical and numerical comparison of flow over ogee spillway in the presence of tailwater.”

    Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 12, pp. 1353-135, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429.

    Kim, S. D., Lee, H. J., and An, S. D. (2010). “Improvement of hydraulic stability for spillway using CFD model.” Int. Journal of the Physical Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 774-780.

    Kokpinar, M. A. and Gogus, M. (2002). “High speed jet flows over spillway aerators.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 885-898, DOI: 10.1139/l02-088.

    Kumcu, S. Y. (2010). Hydraulic model studies of Kavsak Dam and HEPP, DSI Report, HI-1005, DSI-TAKK Publications, Ankara, Turkey.

    Margeirsson, B. (2007). Computational modeling of flow over a spillway, MSc Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

    Nichols, B. D. and Hirt, C. W. (1975). “Methods for calculating multi-dimensional, transient free surface flows past bodies.” Proc. First Intern. Conf. Num., Ship Hydrodynamics, Gaithersburg, ML.

    Savage, B. M. and Johnson, M. C. (2001). “Flow over ogee spillway: Physical and numerical model case study.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 8, pp. 640-649, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429.

    Souders, D. T. and Hirt, C. W. (2004). “Modeling entrainment of air at turbulent free surfaces.” Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental resources Management, pp. 1-10.

    entürk, F. (1994). Hydraulics of dams and reservoirs, Water Resources Publication Colorado, USA.

    Teklemariam, E., Korbaylo, B, Groeneveld, J., Sydor, K., and Fuchs, D. (2001). Optimization of hydraulic design using computational fluid dynamics, Waterpower XII, Salt Lake City, Utah.

    Teklemariam, E., Shumilak, B., Sydor, K., Murray, D., Fuchs, D., and Holder, G. (2008). “An integral approach using both physical and computational modeling can be beneficial in addressing the full range of hydraulic design issues.” CDA Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Canada.

    Usta, E. (2014). Numerical investigation of hydraulic characteristics of Laleli Dam spillway and comparison with physical model study, Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Versteeg, H. K. and Malalasekera, W. (1996). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics, Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group Limited, Harlow, England.

    Vischer, D. L. and Hager, W. H. (1997). Dam hydraulics, J. Wiley & Sons Ltd., England.

    Wagner, W. E. (1967). “Glen Canyon diversion tunnel outlets.” J. Hydraulic Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, No. HY6, pp. 113-134.

    Willey, J., Ewing, T., Wark, B., and Lesleighter, E. (2012). Comple-mentary use of physical and numerical modeling techniques in spillway design refinement, Commission Internationale Des Grands Barrages, Kyoto, June 2012.

    Fig. 1. Averaged error trend.

    Assessment of spillway modeling using computational fluid dynamics

    전산유체역학을 이용한 여수로 모델링 평가

    Authors: Paul G. Chanel and John C. Doering AUTHORS INFO & AFFILIATIONS

    Publication: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

    3 December 2008

    Abstract

    Throughout the design and planning period for future hydroelectric generating stations, hydraulic engineers are increasingly integrating computational fluid dynamics (CFD) into the process. As a result, hydraulic engineers are interested in the reliability of CFD software to provide accurate flow data for a wide range of structures, including a variety of different spillways. In the literature, CFD results have generally been in agreement with physical model experimental data. Despite past success, there has not been a comprehensive assessment that looks at the ability of CFD to model a range of different spillway configurations, including flows with various gate openings. In this article, Flow-3D is used to model the discharge over ogee-crested spillways. The numerical model results are compared with physical model studies for three case study evaluations. The comparison indicates that the accuracy of Flow-3D is related to the parameter P/Hd.

    미래의 수력 발전소를 위한 설계 및 계획 기간 동안 유압 엔지니어는 전산유체역학(CFD)을 프로세스에 점점 더 많이 통합하고 있습니다. 결과적으로 유압 엔지니어는 다양한 여수로를 포함하여 광범위한 구조에 대한 정확한 흐름 데이터를 제공하는 CFD 소프트웨어의 신뢰성에 관심을 갖고 있습니다. 문헌에서 CFD 결과는 일반적으로 물리적 모델 실험 데이터와 일치했습니다. 과거의 성공에도 불구하고 다양한 게이트 개구부가 있는 흐름을 포함하여 다양한 여수로 구성을 모델링하는 CFD의 기능을 살펴보는 포괄적인 평가는 없었습니다. 이 기사에서는 Flow-3D를 사용하여 ogee-crested 방수로의 배출을 모델링합니다. 세 가지 사례 연구 평가를 위해 수치 모델 결과를 물리적 모델 연구와 비교합니다. 비교는 Flow-3D의 정확도가 매개변수 P/Hd와 관련되어 있음을 나타냅니다.

    Résumé

    Les ingénieurs en hydraulique intègrent de plus en plus la dynamique des fluides numérique (« CFD ») dans le processus de conception et de planification des futures centrales. Ainsi, les ingénieurs en hydraulique s’intéressent à la fiabilité du logiciel de « CFD » afin de fournir des données précises sur le débit pour une large gamme de structures, incluant différents types d’évacuateurs. Les résultats de « CFD » dans la littérature ont été globalement sont généralement en accord avec les données expérimentales des essais physiques. Malgré les succès antérieurs, il n’y avait aucune évaluation complète de la capacité des « CFD » à modéliser une plage de configuration des évacuateurs, incluant les débits à diverses ouvertures de vannes. Dans le présent article, le logiciel Flow-3D est utilisé pour modéliser le débit par des évacuateurs en doucine. Les résultats du modèle de calcul sont comparés à ceux des essais physiques pour trois études de cas. La comparaison montre que la précision du logiciel Flow-3D est associée au paramètre P/Hd.

    Fig. 1. Averaged error trend.
    Fig. 1. Averaged error trend.

    Get full access to this article

    View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

    GET ACCESSALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? SIGN IN AS AN INDIVIDUAL OR VIA YOUR INSTITUTION

    References

    Chanel, P.G., and Doering, J.C. 2007. An evaluation of computational fluid dynamics for spillway modelling. In Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (AFMC), Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 3–7 December 2007. pp. 1201–1206.

    Google Scholar

    Flow Science, Inc. 2007. Flow-3D user’s manuals. Version 9.2. Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, N.M.

    Google Scholar

    Gessler, D. 2005. CFD modeling of spillway performance, EWRI 2005: Impacts of global climate change. In Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Anchorage, Alaska, 15–19 May 2005. Edited by R. Walton. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va.

    Google Scholar

    Hirt, C.W., and Nichols, B.D. 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1): 201–225.

    Crossref

    ISI

    Google Scholar

    Hirt, C.W., and Sicilian, J.M. 1985. A porosity technique for the definition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ship Hydro-dynamics, Washington, D.C., 24–27 September 1985. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar

    Ho, D., Cooper, B., Riddette, K., and Donohoo, S. 2006. Application of numerical modelling to spillways in Australia. In Dams and Reservoirs, Societies and Environment in the 21st Century. Edited by Berga et al. Taylor and Francis Group, London.

    Google Scholar

    LaSalle Consulting Group Inc. 1992. Conawapa generating station. Sectional model study of the spillway. LaSalle Consulting Group Inc., Montréal, Que.

    Google Scholar

    Lemke, D.E. 1989. A comparison of the hydraulic performance of an orifice and an overflow spillway in a northern application using physical modeling. M.Sc. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.

    Google Scholar

    Savage, B.M., and Johnson, M.C. 2001. Flow over ogee spillway: Physical and numerical model case study. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(8): 640–649.

    Crossref

    ISI

    Google Scholar

    Teklemariam, E., Korbaylo, B., Groeneveld, J., Sydor, K., and Fuchs, D. 2001. Optimization of hydraulic design using computational fluid dynamics. In Proceedings of Waterpower XII, Salt Lake City, Utah, 9–11 July 2001.

    Google Scholar

    Teklemariam, E., Korbaylo, B., Groeneveld, J., and Fuchs, D. 2002. Computational fluid dynamics: Diverse applications in hydropower project’s design and analysis. In Proceedings of the CWRA 55th Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Man., 11–14 June 2002. Canadian Water Resources Association, Cambridge, Ontario.

    Google Scholar

    Western Canadian Hydraulic Laboratories Inc. 1980. Hydraulics model studies limestone generating station spillway/diversion structure flume study. Final report. Western Canadian Hydraulic Laboratories Inc., Port Coquitlam, B.C.

    Google Scholar

    Sketch of approach channel and spillway of the Kamal-Saleh dam

    CFD modeling of flow pattern in spillway’s approach channel

    Sustainable Water Resources Management volume 1, pages245–251 (2015)Cite this article

    Abstract

    Analysis of behavior and hydraulic characteristics of flow over the dam spillway is a complicated task that takes lots of money and time in water engineering projects planning. To model those hydraulic characteristics, several methods such as physical and numerical methods can be used. Nowadays, by utilizing new methods in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and by the development of fast computers, the numerical methods have become accessible for use in the analysis of such sophisticated flows. The CFD softwares have the capability to analyze two- and three-dimensional flow fields. In this paper, the flow pattern at the guide wall of the Kamal-Saleh dam was modeled by Flow 3D. The results show that the current geometry of the left wall causes instability in the flow pattern and making secondary and vortex flow at beginning approach channel. This shape of guide wall reduced the performance of weir to remove the peak flood discharge.

    댐 여수로 흐름의 거동 및 수리학적 특성 분석은 물 공학 프로젝트 계획에 많은 비용과 시간이 소요되는 복잡한 작업입니다. 이러한 수력학적 특성을 모델링하기 위해 물리적, 수치적 방법과 같은 여러 가지 방법을 사용할 수 있습니다. 요즘에는 전산유체역학(CFD)의 새로운 방법을 활용하고 빠른 컴퓨터의 개발로 이러한 정교한 흐름의 해석에 수치 방법을 사용할 수 있게 되었습니다. CFD 소프트웨어에는 2차원 및 3차원 유동장을 분석하는 기능이 있습니다. 본 논문에서는 Kamal-Saleh 댐 유도벽의 흐름 패턴을 Flow 3D로 모델링하였다. 결과는 왼쪽 벽의 현재 형상이 흐름 패턴의 불안정성을 유발하고 시작 접근 채널에서 2차 및 와류 흐름을 만드는 것을 보여줍니다. 이러한 형태의 안내벽은 첨두방류량을 제거하기 위해 둑의 성능을 저하시켰다.

    Introduction

    Spillways are one of the main structures used in the dam projects. Design of the spillway in all types of dams, specifically earthen dams is important because the inability of the spillway to remove probable maximum flood (PMF) discharge may cause overflow of water which ultimately leads to destruction of the dam (Das and Saikia et al. 2009; E 2013 and Novak et al. 2007). So study on the hydraulic characteristics of this structure is important. Hydraulic properties of spillway including flow pattern at the entrance of the guide walls and along the chute. Moreover, estimating the values of velocity and pressure parameters of flow along the chute is very important (Chanson 2004; Chatila and Tabbara 2004). The purpose of the study on the flow pattern is the effect of wall geometry on the creation transverse waves, flow instability, rotating and reciprocating flow through the inlet of spillway and its chute (Parsaie and Haghiabi 2015ab; Parsaie et al. 2015; Wang and Jiang 2010). The purpose of study on the values of velocity and pressure is to calculate the potential of the structure to occurrence of phenomena such as cavitation (Fattor and Bacchiega 2009; Ma et al. 2010). Sometimes, it can be seen that the spillway design parameters of pressure and velocity are very suitable, but geometry is considered not suitable for conducting walls causing unstable flow pattern over the spillway, rotating flows at the beginning of the spillway and its design reduced the flood discharge capacity (Fattor and Bacchiega 2009). Study on spillway is usually conducted using physical models (Su et al. 2009; Suprapto 2013; Wang and Chen 2009; Wang and Jiang 2010). But recently, with advances in the field of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), study on hydraulic characteristics of this structure has been done with these techniques (Chatila and Tabbara 2004; Zhenwei et al. 2012). Using the CFD as a powerful technique for modeling the hydraulic structures can reduce the time and cost of experiments (Tabbara et al. 2005). In CFD field, the Navier–Stokes equation is solved by powerful numerical methods such as finite element method and finite volumes (Kim and Park 2005; Zhenwei et al. 2012). In order to obtain closed-form Navier–Stokes equations turbulence models, such k − ε and Re-Normalisation Group (RNG) models have been presented. To use the technique of computational fluid dynamics, software packages such as Fluent and Flow 3D, etc., are provided. Recently, these two software packages have been widely used in hydraulic engineering because the performance and their accuracy are very suitable (Gessler 2005; Kim 2007; Kim et al. 2012; Milési and Causse 2014; Montagna et al. 2011). In this paper, to assess the flow pattern at Kamal-Saleh guide wall, numerical method has been used. All the stages of numerical modeling were conducted in the Flow 3D software.

    Materials and methods

    Firstly, a three-dimensional model was constructed according to two-dimensional map that was prepared for designing the spillway. Then a small model was prepared with scale of 1:80 and entered into the Flow 3D software; all stages of the model construction was conducted in AutoCAD 3D. Flow 3D software numerically solved the Navier–Stokes equation by finite volume method. Below is a brief reference on the equations that used in the software. Figure 1 shows the 3D sketch of Kamal-Saleh spillway and Fig. 2 shows the uploading file of the Kamal-Saleh spillway in Flow 3D software.

    figure 1
    Fig. 1
    figure 2
    Fig. 2

    Review of the governing equations in software Flow 3D

    Continuity equation at three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates is given as Eq (1).

    vf∂ρ∂t+∂∂x(uAx)+∂∂x(vAy)+∂∂x(wAz)=PSORρ,vf∂ρ∂t+∂∂x(uAx)+∂∂x(vAy)+∂∂x(wAz)=PSORρ,

    (1)

    where uvz are velocity component in the x, y, z direction; A xA yA z cross-sectional area of the flow; ρ fluid density; PSOR the source term; v f is the volume fraction of the fluid and three-dimensional momentum equations given in Eq (2).

    ∂u∂t+1vf(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂u∂y+wAz∂u∂z)=−1ρ∂P∂x+Gx+fx∂v∂t+1vf(uAx∂v∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂v∂z)=−1ρ∂P∂y+Gy+fy∂w∂t+1vf(uAx∂w∂x+vAy∂w∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=−1ρ∂P∂y+Gz+fz,∂u∂t+1vf(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂u∂y+wAz∂u∂z)=−1ρ∂P∂x+Gx+fx∂v∂t+1vf(uAx∂v∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂v∂z)=−1ρ∂P∂y+Gy+fy∂w∂t+1vf(uAx∂w∂x+vAy∂w∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=−1ρ∂P∂y+Gz+fz,

    (2)

    where P is the fluid pressure; G xG yG z the acceleration created by body fluids; f xf yf z viscosity acceleration in three dimensions and v f is related to the volume of fluid, defined by Eq. (3). For modeling of free surface profile the VOF technique based on the volume fraction of the computational cells has been used. Since the volume fraction F represents the amount of fluid in each cell, it takes value between 0 and 1.

    ∂F∂t+1vf[∂∂x(FAxu)+∂∂y(FAyv)+∂∂y(FAzw)]=0∂F∂t+1vf[∂∂x(FAxu)+∂∂y(FAyv)+∂∂y(FAzw)]=0

    (3)

    Turbulence models

    Flow 3D offers five types of turbulence models: Prantl mixing length, k − ε equation, RNG models, Large eddy simulation model. Turbulence models that have been proposed recently are based on Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations. This approach involves statistical methods to extract an averaged equation related to the turbulence quantities.

    Steps of solving a problem in Flow 3D software

    (1) Preparing the 3D model of spillway by AutoCAD software. (2) Uploading the file of 3D model in Flow 3D software and defining the problem in the software and checking the final mesh. (3) Choosing the basic equations that should be solved. (4) Defining the characteristics of fluid. (5) Defining the boundary conditions; it is notable that this software has a wide range of boundary conditions. (6) Initializing the flow field. (7) Adjusting the output. (8) Adjusting the control parameters, choice of the calculation method and solution formula. (9) Start of calculation. Figure 1 shows the 3D model of the Kamal-Saleh spillway; in this figure, geometry of the left and right guide wall is shown.

    Figure 2 shows the uploading of the 3D spillway dam in Flow 3D software. Moreover, in this figure the considered boundary condition in software is shown. At the entrance and end of spillway, the flow rate or fluid elevation and outflow was considered as BC. The bottom of spillway was considered as wall and left and right as symmetry.

    Model calibration

    Calibration of the Flow 3D for modeling the effect of geometry of guide wall on the flow pattern is included for comparing the results of Flow 3D with measured water surface profile. Calibration the Flow 3D software could be conducted in two ways: first, changing the value of upstream boundary conditions is continued until the results of water surface profile of the Flow 3D along the spillway successfully covered the measurement water surface profile; second is the assessment the mesh sensitivity. Analyzing the size of mesh is a trial-and-error process where the size of mesh is evaluated form the largest to the smallest. With fining the size of mesh the accuracy of model is increased; whereas, the cost of computation is increased. In this research, the value of upstream boundary condition was adjusted with measured data during the experimental studies on the scaled model and the mesh size was equal to 1 × 1 × 1 cm3.

    Results and discussion

    The behavior of water in spillway is strongly affected by the flow pattern at the entrance of the spillway, the flow pattern formation at the entrance is affected by the guide wall, and choice of an optimized form for the guide wall has a great effect on rising the ability of spillway for easy passing the PMF, so any nonuniformity in flow in the approach channel can cause reduction of spillway capacity, reduction in discharge coefficient of spillway, and even probability of cavitation. Optimizing the flow guiding walls (in terms of length, angle and radius) can cause the loss of turbulence and flow disturbances on spillway. For this purpose, initially geometry proposed for model for the discharge of spillway dam, Kamal-Saleh, 80, 100, and 120 (L/s) were surveyed. These discharges of flow were considered with regard to the flood return period, 5, 100 and 1000 years. Geometric properties of the conducting guidance wall are given in Table 1.Table 1 Characteristics and dimensions of the guidance walls tested

    Full size table

    Results of the CFD simulation for passing the flow rate 80 (L/s) are shown in Fig. 3. Figure 3 shows the secondary flow and vortex at the left guide wall.

    figure 3
    Fig. 3

    For giving more information about flow pattern at the left and right guide wall, Fig. 4 shows the flow pattern at the right side guide wall and Fig. 5 shows the flow pattern at the left side guide wall.

    figure 4
    Fig. 4
    figure 5
    Fig. 5

    With regard to Figs. 4 and 5 and observing the streamlines, at discharge equal to 80 (L/s), the right wall has suitable performance but the left wall has no suitable performance and the left wall of the geometric design creates a secondary and circular flow, and vortex motion in the beginning of the entrance of spillway that creates cross waves at the beginning of spillway. By increasing the flow rate (Q = 100 L/s), at the inlet spillway secondary flows and vortex were removed, but the streamline is severely distorted. Results of the guide wall performances at the Q = 100 (L/s) are shown in Fig. 6.

    figure 6
    Fig. 6

    Also more information about the performance of each guide wall can be derived from Figs. 7 and 8. These figures uphold that the secondary and vortex flows were removed, but the streamlines were fully diverted specifically near the left side guide wall.

    figure 7
    Fig. 7
    figure 8
    Fig. 8

    As mentioned in the past, these secondary and vortex flows and diversion in streamline cause nonuniformity and create cross wave through the spillway. Figure 9 shows the cross waves at the crest of the spillway.

    figure 9
    Fig. 9

    The performance of guide walls at the Q = 120 (L/s) also was assessed. The result of simulation is shown in Fig. 10. Figures 11 and 12 show a more clear view of the streamlines near to right and left side guide wall, respectively. As seen in Fig. 12, the left side wall still causes vortex flow and creation of and diversion in streamline.

    figure 10
    Fig. 10
    figure 11
    Fig. 11
    figure 12
    Fig. 12

    The results of the affected left side guide wall shape on the cross wave creation are shown in Fig. 13. As seen from Fig. 3, the left side guide wall also causes cross wave at the spillway crest.

    figure 13
    Fig. 13

    As can be seen clearly in Figs. 9 and 13, by moving from the left side to the right side of the spillway, the cross waves and the nonuniformity in flow is removed. By reviewing Figs. 9 and 13, it is found that the right side guide wall removes the cross waves and nonuniformity. With this point as aim, a geometry similar to the right side guide wall was considered instead of the left side guide wall. The result of simulation for Q = 120 (L/s) is shown in Fig. 14. As seen from this figure, the proposed geometry for the left side wall has suitable performance smoothly passing the flow through the approach channel and spillway.

    figure 14
    Fig. 14

    More information about the proposed shape for the left guide wall is shown in Fig. 15. As seen from this figure, this shape has suitable performance for removing the cross waves and vortex flows.

    figure 15
    Fig. 15

    Figure 16 shows the cross section of flow at the crest of spillway. As seen in this figure, the proposed shape for the left side guide wall is suitable for removing the cross waves and secondary flows.

    figure 16
    Fig. 16

    Conclusion

    Analysis of behavior and hydraulic properties of flow over the spillway dam is a complicated task which is cost and time intensive. Several techniques suitable to the purposes of study have been undertaken in this research. Physical modeling, usage of expert experience, usage of mathematical models on simulation flow in one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional techniques, are some of the techniques utilized to study this phenomenon. The results of the modeling show that the CFD technique is a suitable tool for simulating the flow pattern in the guide wall. Using this tools helps the designer for developing the optimal shape for hydraulic structure which the flow pattern through them are important.

    References

    • Chanson H (2004) 19—Design of weirs and spillways. In: Chanson H (ed) Hydraulics of open channel flow, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 391–430Chapter Google Scholar 
    • Chatila J, Tabbara M (2004) Computational modeling of flow over an ogee spillway. Comput Struct 82:1805–1812Article Google Scholar 
    • Das MM, Saikia MD (2009) Irrigation and water power engineering. PHI Learning, New DelhiGoogle Scholar 
    • E, Department Of Army: U.S. Army Corps (2013) Hydraulic Design of Spillways. BiblioBazaar, CharlestonGoogle Scholar 
    • Fattor C, Bacchiega J (2009) Design conditions for morning-glory spillways: application to potrerillos dam spillway. Adv Water Res Hydraul Eng Springer, Berlin, pp 2123–2128Google Scholar 
    • Gessler D (2005) CFD modeling of spillway performance. Impacts Glob Clim Change. doi:10.1061/40792(173)398
    • Kim D-G (2007) Numerical analysis of free flow past a sluice gate. KSCE J Civ Eng 11:127–132Article Google Scholar 
    • Kim D, Park J (2005) Analysis of flow structure over ogee-spillway in consideration of scale and roughness effects by using CFD model. KSCE J Civ Eng 9:161–169Article Google Scholar 
    • Kim S, Yu K, Yoon B, Lim Y (2012) A numerical study on hydraulic characteristics in the ice Harbor-type fishway. KSCE J Civ Eng 16:265–272Article Google Scholar 
    • Ma X-D, Dai G-Q, Yang Q, Li G-J, Zhao L (2010) Analysis of influence factors of cavity length in the spillway tunnel downstream of middle gate chamber outlet with sudden lateral enlargement and vertical drop aerator. J Hydrodyn Ser B 22:680–686Article Google Scholar 
    • Milési G, Causse S (2014) 3D numerical modeling of a side-channel spillway. In: Gourbesville P, Cunge J, Caignaert G (eds) Advances in hydroinformatics. Springer, Singapore, pp 487–498Chapter Google Scholar 
    • Montagna F, Bellotti G, Di Risio M (2011) 3D numerical modeling of landslide-generated tsunamis around a conical island. Nat Hazards 58:591–608Article Google Scholar 
    • Novak P, Moffat AIB, Nalluri C, Narayanan R (2007) Hydraulic structures. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar 
    • Parsaie A, Haghiabi A (2015a) Computational modeling of pollution transmission in rivers. Appl Water Sci. doi:10.1007/s13201-015-0319-6
    • Parsaie A, Haghiabi A (2015b) The effect of predicting discharge coefficient by neural network on increasing the numerical modeling accuracy of flow over side weir. Water Res Manag 29:973–985Article Google Scholar 
    • Parsaie A, Yonesi H, Najafian S (2015) Predictive modeling of discharge in compound open channel by support vector machine technique. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:1–6Article Google Scholar 
    • Su P-L, Liao H-S, Qiu Y, Li CJ (2009) Experimental study on a new type of aerator in spillway with low Froude number and mild slope flow. J Hydrodyn Ser B 21:415–422Article Google Scholar 
    • Suprapto M (2013) Increase spillway capacity using Labyrinth Weir. Procedia Eng 54:440–446Article Google Scholar 
    • Tabbara M, Chatila J, Awwad R (2005) Computational simulation of flow over stepped spillways. Comput Struct 83:2215–2224Article Google Scholar 
    • Wang J, Chen H (2009) Experimental study of elimination of vortices along guide wall of bank spillway. Adv Water Res Hydraul Eng Springer, Berlin, pp 2059–2063Google Scholar 
    • Wang Y, Jiang C (2010) Investigation of the surface vortex in a spillway tunnel intake. Tsinghua Sci Technol 15:561–565Article Google Scholar 
    • Zhenwei MU, Zhiyan Z, Tao Z (2012) Numerical simulation of 3-D flow field of spillway based on VOF method. Procedia Eng 28:808–812Article Google Scholar 

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Water Engineering, Lorestan University, Khorram Abad, IranAbbas Parsaie, Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi & Amir Moradinejad

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Abbas Parsaie.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Parsaie, A., Haghiabi, A.H. & Moradinejad, A. CFD modeling of flow pattern in spillway’s approach channel. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 1, 245–251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-015-0020-9

    Download citation

    • Received28 April 2015
    • Accepted28 August 2015
    • Published15 September 2015
    • Issue DateSeptember 2015
    • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-015-0020-9

    Share this article

    Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable link

    Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

    Keywords

    • Approach channel
    • Kamal-Saleh dam
    • Guide wall
    • Flow pattern
    • Numerical modeling
    • Flow 3D software
      Figure 3. FLOW-3D results for Strathcona Dam spillway with all gates fully open at an elevated reservoir level during passage of a large flood. Note the effects of poor approach conditions and pier overtopping at the leftmost bay.

      BC Hydro Assesses Spillway Hydraulics with FLOW-3D

      by Faizal Yusuf, M.A.Sc., P.Eng.
      Specialist Engineer in the Hydrotechnical Department at BC Hydro

      BC Hydro, a public electric utility in British Columbia, uses FLOW-3D to investigate complex hydraulics issues at several existing dams and to assist in the design and optimization of proposed facilities.

      Faizal Yusuf, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Specialist Engineer in the Hydrotechnical department at BC Hydro, presents three case studies that highlight the application of FLOW-3D to different types of spillways and the importance of reliable prototype or physical hydraulic model data for numerical model calibration.

      W.A.C. Bennett Dam
      At W.A.C. Bennett Dam, differences in the spillway geometry between the physical hydraulic model from the 1960s and the prototype make it difficult to draw reliable conclusions on shock wave formation and chute capacity from physical model test results. The magnitude of shock waves in the concrete-lined spillway chute are strongly influenced by a 44% reduction in the chute width downstream of the three radial gates at the headworks, as well as the relative openings of the radial gates. The shock waves lead to locally higher water levels that have caused overtopping of the chute walls under certain historical operations.Prototype spill tests for discharges up to 2,865 m3/s were performed in 2012 to provide surveyed water surface profiles along chute walls, 3D laser scans of the water surface in the chute and video of flow patterns for FLOW-3D model calibration. Excellent agreement was obtained between the numerical model and field observations, particularly for the location and height of the first shock wave at the chute walls (Figure 1).

      W.A.C에서 Bennett Dam, 1960년대의 물리적 수력학 모델과 프로토타입 사이의 여수로 형상의 차이로 인해 물리적 모델 테스트 결과에서 충격파 형성 및 슈트 용량에 대한 신뢰할 수 있는 결론을 도출하기 어렵습니다. 콘크리트 라이닝 방수로 낙하산의 충격파 크기는 방사형 게이트의 상대적인 개구부뿐만 아니라 헤드워크에 있는 3개의 방사형 게이트 하류의 슈트 폭이 44% 감소함에 따라 크게 영향을 받습니다. 충격파는 특정 역사적 작업에서 슈트 벽의 범람을 야기한 국부적으로 더 높은 수위로 이어집니다. 최대 2,865m3/s의 배출에 대한 프로토타입 유출 테스트가 2012년에 수행되어 슈트 벽을 따라 조사된 수면 프로필, 3D 레이저 스캔을 제공했습니다. FLOW-3D 모델 보정을 위한 슈트의 수면 및 흐름 패턴 비디오. 특히 슈트 벽에서 첫 번째 충격파의 위치와 높이에 대해 수치 모델과 현장 관찰 간에 탁월한 일치가 이루어졌습니다(그림 1).
      Figure 1. Comparison between prototype observations and FLOW-3D for a spill discharge of 2,865 m^3/s at Bennett Dam spillway.
      Figure 1. Comparison between prototype observations and FLOW-3D for a spill discharge of 2,865 m^3/s at Bennett Dam spillway.

      The calibrated FLOW-3D model confirmed that the design flood could be safely passed without overtopping the spillway chute walls as long as all three radial gates are opened as prescribed in existing operating orders with the outer gates open more than the inner gate.

      The CFD model also provided insight into the concrete damage in the spillway chute. Cavitation indices computed from FLOW-3D simulation results were compared with empirical data from the USBR and found to be consistent with the historical performance of the spillway. The numerical analysis supported field inspections, which concluded that deterioration of the concrete conditions in the chute is likely not due to cavitation.

      Strathcona Dam
      FLOW-3D was used to investigate poor approach conditions and uncertainties with the rating curves for Strathcona Dam spillway, which includes three vertical lift gates on the right abutment of the dam. The rating curves for Strathcona spillway were developed from a combination of empirical adjustments and limited physical hydraulic model testing in a flume that did not include geometry of the piers and abutments.

      Numerical model testing and calibration was based on comparisons with prototype spill observations from 1982 when all three gates were fully open, resulting in a large depression in the water surface upstream of the leftmost bay (Figure 2). The approach flow to the leftmost bay is distorted by water flowing parallel to the dam axis and plunging over the concrete retaining wall adjacent to the upstream slope of the earthfill dam. The flow enters the other two bays much more smoothly. In addition to very similar flow patterns produced in the numerical model compared to the prototype, simulated water levels at the gate section matched 1982 field measurements to within 0.1 m.

      보정된 FLOW-3D 모델은 외부 게이트가 내부 게이트보다 더 많이 열려 있는 기존 운영 명령에 규정된 대로 3개의 방사형 게이트가 모두 열리는 한 여수로 낙하산 벽을 넘지 않고 설계 홍수를 안전하게 통과할 수 있음을 확인했습니다.

      CFD 모델은 방수로 낙하산의 콘크리트 손상에 대한 통찰력도 제공했습니다. FLOW-3D 시뮬레이션 결과에서 계산된 캐비테이션 지수는 USBR의 경험적 데이터와 비교되었으며 여수로의 역사적 성능과 일치하는 것으로 나타났습니다. 수치 분석은 현장 검사를 지원했으며, 슈트의 콘크리트 상태 악화는 캐비테이션 때문이 아닐 가능성이 높다고 결론지었습니다.

      Strathcona 댐
      FLOW-3D는 Strathcona Dam 여수로에 대한 등급 곡선을 사용하여 열악한 접근 조건과 불확실성을 조사하는 데 사용되었습니다. 여기에는 댐의 오른쪽 접합부에 3개의 수직 리프트 게이트가 포함되어 있습니다. Strathcona 여수로에 대한 등급 곡선은 경험적 조정과 교각 및 교대의 형상을 포함하지 않는 수로에서 제한된 물리적 수리 모델 테스트의 조합으로 개발되었습니다.

      수치 모델 테스트 및 보정은 세 개의 수문이 모두 완전히 개방된 1982년의 프로토타입 유출 관측과의 비교를 기반으로 했으며, 그 결과 가장 왼쪽 만의 상류 수면에 큰 함몰이 발생했습니다(그림 2). 최좌단 만으로의 접근 흐름은 댐 축과 평행하게 흐르는 물과 흙채움댐의 상류 경사면에 인접한 콘크리트 옹벽 위로 떨어지는 물에 의해 왜곡됩니다. 흐름은 훨씬 더 원활하게 다른 두 베이로 들어갑니다. 프로토타입과 비교하여 수치 모델에서 생성된 매우 유사한 흐름 패턴 외에도 게이트 섹션에서 시뮬레이션된 수위는 1982년 현장 측정과 0.1m 이내로 일치했습니다.

      Figure 2. Prototype observations and FLOW-3D results for a Strathcona Dam spill in 1982 with all three gates fully open.
      Figure 2. Prototype observations and FLOW-3D results for a Strathcona Dam spill in 1982 with all three gates fully open.

      The calibrated CFD model produces discharges within 5% of the spillway rating curve for the reservoir’s normal operating range with all gates fully open. However, at higher reservoir levels, which may occur during passage of large floods (as shown in Figure 3), the difference between simulated discharges and the rating curves are greater than 10% as the physical model testing with simplified geometry and empirical corrections did not adequately represent the complex approach flow patterns. The FLOW-3D model provided further insight into the accuracy of rating curves for individual bays, gated conditions and the transition between orifice and free surface flow.

      보정된 CFD 모델은 모든 게이트가 완전히 열린 상태에서 저수지의 정상 작동 범위에 대한 여수로 등급 곡선의 5% 이내에서 배출을 생성합니다. 그러나 대규모 홍수가 통과하는 동안 발생할 수 있는 더 높은 저수지 수위에서는(그림 3 참조) 단순화된 기하학과 경험적 수정을 사용한 물리적 모델 테스트가 그렇지 않았기 때문에 모의 배출과 등급 곡선 간의 차이는 10% 이상입니다. 복잡한 접근 흐름 패턴을 적절하게 표현합니다. FLOW-3D 모델은 개별 베이, 게이트 조건 및 오리피스와 자유 표면 흐름 사이의 전환에 대한 등급 곡선의 정확도에 대한 추가 통찰력을 제공했습니다.

      Figure 3. FLOW-3D results for Strathcona Dam spillway with all gates fully open at an elevated reservoir level during passage of a large flood. Note the effects of poor approach conditions and pier overtopping at the leftmost bay.
      Figure 3. FLOW-3D results for Strathcona Dam spillway with all gates fully open at an elevated reservoir level during passage of a large flood. Note the effects of poor approach conditions and pier overtopping at the leftmost bay.

      John Hart Dam
      The John Hart concrete dam will be modified to include a new free crest spillway to be situated between an existing gated spillway and a low level outlet structure that is currently under construction. Significant improvements in the design of the proposed spillway were made through a systematic optimization process using FLOW-3D.

      The preliminary design of the free crest spillway was based on engineering hydraulic design guides. Concrete apron blocks are intended to protect the rock at the toe of the dam. A new right training wall will guide the flow from the new spillway towards the tailrace pool and protect the low level outlet structure from spillway discharges.

      FLOW-3D model results for the initial and optimized design of the new spillway are shown in Figure 4. CFD analysis led to a 10% increase in discharge capacity, significant decrease in roadway impingement above the spillway crest and improved flow patterns including up to a 5 m reduction in water levels along the proposed right wall. Physical hydraulic model testing will be used to confirm the proposed design.

      존 하트 댐
      John Hart 콘크리트 댐은 현재 건설 중인 기존 배수로와 저층 배수로 사이에 위치할 새로운 자유 마루 배수로를 포함하도록 수정될 것입니다. FLOW-3D를 사용한 체계적인 최적화 프로세스를 통해 제안된 여수로 설계의 상당한 개선이 이루어졌습니다.

      자유 마루 여수로의 예비 설계는 엔지니어링 수력학 설계 가이드를 기반으로 했습니다. 콘크리트 앞치마 블록은 댐 선단부의 암석을 보호하기 위한 것입니다. 새로운 오른쪽 훈련 벽은 새 여수로에서 테일레이스 풀로 흐름을 안내하고 여수로 배출로부터 낮은 수준의 배출구 구조를 보호합니다.

      새 여수로의 초기 및 최적화된 설계에 대한 FLOW-3D 모델 결과는 그림 4에 나와 있습니다. CFD 분석을 통해 방류 용량이 10% 증가하고 여수로 마루 위의 도로 충돌이 크게 감소했으며 최대 제안된 오른쪽 벽을 따라 수위가 5m 감소합니다. 제안된 설계를 확인하기 위해 물리적 수압 모델 테스트가 사용됩니다.

      Figure 4. FLOW-3D model results for the preliminary and optimized layout of the proposed spillway at John Hart Dam.
      Figure 4. FLOW-3D model results for the preliminary and optimized layout of the proposed spillway at John Hart Dam.

      Conclusion

      BC Hydro has been using FLOW-3D to investigate a wide range of challenging hydraulics problems for different types of spillways and water conveyance structures leading to a greatly improved understanding of flow patterns and performance. Prototype data and reliable physical hydraulic model testing are used whenever possible to improve confidence in the numerical model results.

      다양한 유형의 여수로 및 물 수송 구조로 인해 흐름 패턴 및 성능에 대한 이해가 크게 향상되었습니다. 프로토타입 데이터와 신뢰할 수 있는 물리적 유압 모델 테스트는 수치 모델 결과의 신뢰도를 향상시키기 위해 가능할 때마다 사용됩니다.

      About Flow Science, Inc.
      Based in Santa Fe, New Mexico USA, Flow Science was founded in 1980 by Dr. C. W. (Tony) Hirt, who was one of the principals in pioneering the “Volume-of-Fluid” or VOF method while working at the Los Alamos National Lab. FLOW-3D is a direct descendant of this work, and in the subsequent years, we have increased its sophistication with TruVOF, boasting pioneering improvements in the speed and accuracy of tracking distinct liquid/gas interfaces. Today, Flow Science products offer complete multiphysics simulation with diverse modeling capabilities including fluid-structure interaction, 6-DoF moving objects, and multiphase flows. From inception, our vision has been to provide our customers with excellence in flow modeling software and services.

      Figure 10. Flow distribution at the approach channel in PMF based on revised plan design. A. Hydarulic model test; B. Numerical simulation; C. Section view.

      Improvement of hydraulic stability for spillway using CFD model

      Hydraulic model test was used to analyze the rapidly varied flow on the spillway. But, it has some shortcomings such as error of scale effect and expensive costs. Recently, through the development of three dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD), rapidly varied flow and turbulence can be simulated. In this study, the applicability of CFD model to simulate flow on the spillway was reviewed. The Karian dam in Indonesia was selected as the study area. The FLOW-3d model, which is well known to simulate a flow having a free surface, was used to analyze flow. The flow stability in approach channel was investigated with the initial plan design, and the results showed that the flow in approach channel is unstable in the initial plan design. To improve flow stability in the spillway, therefore, the revised plan design was formulated. The appropriateness of the revised design was examined by a numerical modeling. The results showed that the flow in spillway is stable in the revised design.

      여수로의 급격하게 변화하는 흐름을 분석하기 위해 수리학적 모델 테스트를 사용했습니다. 그러나 스케일 효과의 오차와 고가의 비용 등의 단점이 있다. 최근에는 3차원 전산유체역학(CFD)의 발달로 급변하는 유동과 난류를 모사할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 여수로의 흐름을 시뮬레이션하기 위한 CFD 모델의 적용 가능성을 검토했습니다. 인도네시아의 Karian 댐이 연구 지역으로 선정되었습니다. 자유표면을 갖는 유동을 모의하는 것으로 잘 알려진 FLOW-3d 모델을 유동해석에 사용하였다. 접근수로의 흐름 안정성은 초기 계획설계와 함께 조사한 결과 초기 계획설계에서 접근수로의 흐름이 불안정한 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 방수로의 흐름 안정성을 향상시키기 위해 수정된 계획 설계가 공식화되었습니다. 수정된 설계의 적합성을 수치모델링을 통해 검토하였다. 결과는 수정된 설계에서 여수로의 흐름이 안정적이라는 것을 보여주었습니다.

      Key words

      Spillway, FLOW-3D, approach channel, flow stability, numerical modeling, hydraulic model test.

      Figure 6. Two dimensional flow velocity distribution at the
approach channel (Flow velocity distribution at depth EL. 68.12 m).
      Figure 6. Two dimensional flow velocity distribution at the approach channel (Flow velocity distribution at depth EL. 68.12 m).
      Figure 7. Flow distribution at the approach channel in PMF.
A. Hydraulic model test; B. Numerial simulatio
C. Cross section view.
      Figure 7. Flow distribution at the approach channel in PMF. A. Hydraulic model test; B. Numerial simulatio C. Cross section view.
      Figure 8. Revised approach channel section.
A. Initial plan design; B. Revised plan design.
      Figure 8. Revised approach channel section. A. Initial plan design; B. Revised plan design.
      Figure 9. Two dimensional flow velocity distribution at the approach channel
based on revised plan design (Flow velocity distribution at depth EL. 68.12 m).
      Figure 9. Two dimensional flow velocity distribution at the approach channel based on revised plan design (Flow velocity distribution at depth EL. 68.12 m).
      Figure 10. Flow distribution at the approach channel in PMF based on revised plan design.
A. Hydarulic model test; B. Numerical simulation; C. Section view.
      Figure 10. Flow distribution at the approach channel in PMF based on revised plan design. A. Hydarulic model test; B. Numerical simulation; C. Section view.

      REFERENCES

      Betts PL (1979). A variation principle in terms of stream function for free
      surface flows and its application to finite element method. Comp.
      Fluids, 7(2): 145-153.
      Cassidy JJ (1965). Irrotational flow over spillways of finite height. J.
      Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE., 91(6): 155-173.
      Flow Science (2002). FLOW-3D -Theory manual. Los Alamos, NM.
      Guo Y, Wen X, Wu C, Fang D (1998). Numerical modeling of spillway
      flow with free drop and initially unknown discharge. J. Hydraulic Res.
      IAHR, 36(5): 785-801.
      Ho DKH, Donohoo SM (2001). Investigation of spillway behavior under
      increased maximum flood by computational fluid dynamics technique.
      Proceeding 14
      th Australasian Fluid Mech. Conference, Adelaide
      University, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 10-14.
      Ikegawa M, Washizu K (1973). Finite element method applied to
      analysis of flow over a spillway crest. Int. J. Numerical Methods Eng.,
      6: 179-189.
      Kim DG, Park JH (2005). Analysis of flow structure over ogee-spillway
      in consideration of scale and roughness effects by using CFD model.
      J. Civil Eng. KSCE., pp. 161-169.
      KRA, KWATER (2006). Feasibility study and detail design of the Karian
      dam project. Indonesia.
      Li W, Xie Q, Chen CJ (1989). Finite analytic solution of flow over
      spillways, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 115(2): 2645-2648.
      Olsen NR, Kjellesvig HM (1998).Three-dimensional numerical flow
      modeling for estimation of spillway capacity. J. Hydraulic Res. IAHR.,
      36(5): 775-784.
      Savage BM, Johnson MC (2001). Flow over ogee spillway: Physical and
      numerical model case study. J. Hydraulic Eng. ASCE., 127(8): 640-
      649.
      Tabbara M, Chatial J, Awwad R (2005). Computational simulation of
      flow over stepped spillways. Comput. Structure, 83: 2215-2224.

      Fig. 8. Comparison of the wave pattern for : (a) Ship wave only; (b) Ship wave in the presence of a following current.

      균일한 해류가 존재하는 선박 파도의 수치 시뮬레이션

      Numerical simulation of ship waves in the presence of a uniform current

      CongfangAiYuxiangMaLeiSunGuohaiDongState Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China

      Highlights

      • Ship waves in the presence of a uniform current are studied by a non-hydrostatic model.

      • Effects of a following current on characteristic wave parameters are investigated.

      • Effects of an opposing current on characteristic wave parameters are investigated.

      • The response of the maximum water level elevation to the ship draft is discussed.

      Abstract

      이 논문은 균일한 해류가 존재할 때 선박파의 생성 및 전파를 시뮬레이션하기 위한 비정역학적 모델을 제시합니다. 선박 선체의 움직임을 표현하기 위해 움직이는 압력장 방법이 모델에 통합되었습니다.

      뒤따르거나 반대 방향의 균일한 흐름이 있는 경우의 선박 파도의 수치 결과를 흐름이 없는 선박 파도의 수치 결과와 비교합니다. 추종 또는 반대 균일 전류가 존재할 때 계산된 첨단선 각도는 분석 솔루션과 잘 일치합니다. 추종 균일 전류와 반대 균일 전류가 특성파 매개변수에 미치는 영향을 제시하고 논의합니다.

      선박 흘수에 대한 최대 수위 상승의 응답은 추종 또는 반대의 균일한 흐름이 있는 경우에도 표시되며 흐름이 없는 선박 파도의 응답과 비교됩니다. 선박 선체 측면의 최대 수위 상승은 Froude 수 Fr’=Us/gh의 특정 범위에 대해 다음과 같은 균일한 흐름의 존재에 의해 증가될 수 있음이 밝혀졌습니다.

      여기서 Us는 선박 속도이고 h는 물입니다. 깊이. 균일한 해류를 무시하면 추종류나 반대류가 존재할 때 선박 흘수에 대한 최대 수위 상승의 응답이 과소평가될 수 있습니다.

      본 연구는 선박파의 해석에 있어 균일한 해류의 영향을 고려해야 함을 시사합니다.

      This paper presents a non-hydrostatic model to simulate the generation and propagation of ship waves in the presence of a uniform current. A moving pressure field method is incorporated into the model to represent the movement of a ship hull. Numerical results of ship waves in the presence of a following or an opposing uniform current are compared with those of ship waves without current. The calculated cusp-line angles in the presence of a following or opposing uniform current agree well with analytical solutions. The effects of a following uniform current and an opposing uniform current on the characteristic wave parameters are presented and discussed. The response of the maximum water level elevation to the ship draft is also presented in the presence of a following or an opposing uniform current and is compared with that for ship waves without current. It is found that the maximum water level elevation lateral to the ship hull can be increased by the presence of a following uniform current for a certain range of Froude numbers Fr′=Us/gh, where Us is the ship speed and h is the water depth. If the uniform current is neglected, the response of the maximum water level elevation to the ship draft in the presence of a following or an opposing current can be underestimated. The present study indicates that the effect of a uniform current should be considered in the analysis of ship waves.

      Keywords

      Ship waves, Non-hydrostatic model, Following current, Opposing current, Wave parameters

      1. Introduction

      Similar to wind waves, ships sailing across the sea can also create free-surface undulations ranging from ripples to waves of large size (Grue, 20172020). Ship waves can cause sediment suspension and engineering structures damage and even pose a threat to flora and fauna living near the embankments of waterways (Dempwolff et al., 2022). It is quite important to understand ship waves in various environments. The study of ship waves has been conducted over a century. A large amount of research (Almström et al., 2021Bayraktar and Beji, 2013David et al., 2017Ertekin et al., 1986Gourlay, 2001Havelock, 1908Lee and Lee, 2019Samaras and Karambas, 2021Shi et al., 2018) focused on the generation and propagation of ship waves without current. When a ship navigates in the sea or in a river where tidal flows or river flows always exist, the effect of currents should be taken into account. However, the effect of currents on the characteristic parameters of ship waves is still unclear, because very few publications have been presented on this topic.

      Over the past two decades, many two-dimensional (2D) Boussinesq-type models (Bayraktar and Beji, 2013Dam et al., 2008David et al., 2017Samaras and Karambas, 2021Shi et al., 2018) were developed to examine ship waves. For example, Bayraktar and Beji (2013) solved Boussinesq equations with improved dispersion characteristics to simulate ship waves due to a moving pressure field. David et al. (2017) employed a Boussinesq-type model to investigate the effects of the pressure field and its propagation speed on characteristic wave parameters. All of these Boussinesq-type models aimed to simulate ship waves without current except for that of Dam et al. (2008), who investigated the effect of currents on the maximum wave height of ship waves in a narrow channel.

      In addition to Boussinesq-type models, numerical models based on the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE) or Euler equations are also capable of resolving ship waves. Lee and Lee (20192021) employed the FLOW-3D model to simulate ship waves without current and ship waves in the presence of a uniform current to confirm their equations for ship wave crests. FLOW-3D is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software based on the NSE, and the volume of fluid (VOF) method is used to capture the moving free surface. However, VOF-based NSE models are computationally expensive due to the treatment of the free surface. To efficiently track the free surface, non-hydrostatic models employ the so-called free surface equation and can be solved efficiently. One pioneering application for the simulation of ship waves by the non-hydrostatic model was initiated by Ma (2012) and named XBeach. Recently, Almström et al. (2021) validated XBeach with improved dispersive behavior by comparison with field measurements. XBeach employed in Almström et al. (2021) is a 2-layer non-hydrostatic model and is accurate up to Kh=4 for the linear dispersion relation (de Ridder et al., 2020), where K=2π/L is the wavenumber. L is the wavelength, and h is the still water depth. However, no applications of non-hydrostatic models on the simulation of ship waves in the presence of a uniform current have been published. For more advances in the numerical modelling of ship waves, the reader is referred to Dempwolff et al. (2022).

      This paper investigates ship waves in the presence of a uniform current by using a non-hydrostatic model (Ai et al., 2019), in which a moving pressure field method is incorporated to represent the movement of a ship hull. The model solves the incompressible Euler equations by using a semi-implicit algorithm and is associated with iterating to solve the Poisson equation. The model with two, three and five layers is accurate up to Kh= 7, 15 and 40, respectively (Ai et al., 2019) in resolving the linear dispersion relation. To the best of our knowledge, ship waves in the presence of currents have been studied theoretically (Benjamin et al., 2017Ellingsen, 2014Li and Ellingsen, 2016Li et al., 2019.) and numerically (Dam et al., 2008Lee and Lee, 20192021). However, no publications have presented the effects of a uniform current on characteristic wave parameters except for Dam et al. (2008), who investigated only the effect of currents on the maximum wave height in a narrow channel for the narrow relative Froude number Fr=(Us−Uc)/gh ranging from 0.47 to 0.76, where Us is the ship speed and Uc is the current velocity. To reveal the effect of currents on the characteristic parameters of ship waves, the main objectives of this paper are (1) to validate the capability of the proposed model to resolve ship waves in the presence of a uniform current, (2) to investigate the effects of a following or an opposing current on characteristic wave parameters including the maximum water level elevation and the leading wave period in the ship wave train, (3) to show the differences in characteristic wave parameters between ship waves in the presence of a uniform current and those without current when the same relative Froude number Fr is specified, and (4) to examine the response of the maximum water level elevation to the ship draft in the presence of a uniform current.

      The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The non-hydrostatic model for ship waves is described in Section 2. Section 3 presents numerical validations for ship waves. Numerical results and discussions about the effects of a uniform current on characteristic wave parameters are provided in Section 4, and a conclusion is presented in Section 5.

      2. Non-hydrostatic model for ship waves

      2.1. Governing equations

      The 3D incompressible Euler equations are expressed in the following form:(1)∂u∂x+∂v∂y+∂w∂z=0(2)∂u∂t+∂u2∂x+∂uv∂y+∂uw∂z=−∂p∂x(3)∂v∂t+∂uv∂x+∂v2∂y+∂vw∂z=−∂p∂y(4)∂w∂t+∂uw∂x+∂vw∂y+∂w2∂z=−∂p∂z−gwhere t is the time; u(x,y,z,t), v(x,y,z,t) and w(x,y,z,t) are the velocity components in the horizontal x, y and vertical z directions, respectively; p(x,y,z,t) is the pressure divided by a constant reference density; and g is the gravitational acceleration.

      The pressure p(x,y,z,t) can be expressed as(5)p=ps+g(η−z)+qwhere ps(x,y,t) is the pressure at the free surface, η(x,y,t) is the free surface elevation, and q(x,y,z,t) is the non-hydrostatic pressure.

      η(x,y,t) is calculated by the following free-surface equation:(6)∂η∂t+∂∂x∫−hηudz+∂∂y∫−hηvdz=0where z=−h(x,y) is the bottom surface.

      To generate ship waves, ps(x,y,t) is determined by the following slender-body type pressure field (Bayraktar and Beji, 2013David et al., 2017Samaras and Karambas, 2021):

      For −L/2≤x’≤L/2,−B/2≤y’≤B/2(7)ps(x,y,t)|t=0=pm[1−cL(x′/L)4][1−cB(y′/B)2]exp⁡[−a(y′/B)2]where x′=x−x0 and y′=y−y0. (x0,y0) is the center of the pressure field, pm is the peak pressure defined at (x0,y0), and L and B are the lengthwise and breadthwise parameters, respectively. cL, cB and a are set to 16, 2 and 16, respectively.

      2.2. Numerical algorithms

      In this study, the generation of ship waves is incorporated into the semi-implicit non-hydrostatic model developed by Ai et al. (2019). The 3D grid system used in the model is built from horizontal rectangular grids by adding horizontal layers. The horizontal layers are distributed uniformly along the water depth, which means the layer thickness is defined by Δz=(η+h)/Nz, where Nz is the number of horizontal layers.

      In the solution procedure, the first step is to generate ship waves by implementing Eq. (7) together with the prescribed ship track. In the second step, Eqs. (1)(2)(3)(4) are solved by the pressure correction method, which can be subdivided into three stages. The first stage is to compute intermediate velocities un+1/2, vn+1/2, and wn+1/2 by solving Eqs. (2)(3)(4), which contain the non-hydrostatic pressure at the preceding time level. In the second stage, the Poisson equation for the non-hydrostatic pressure correction term is solved on the graphics processing unit (GPU) in conjunction with the conjugate gradient method. The third stage is to compute the new velocities un+1, vn+1, and wn+1 by correcting the intermediate values after including the non-hydrostatic pressure correction term. In the discretization of Eqs. (2)(3), the gradient terms of the water surface ∂η/∂x and ∂η/∂y are discretized by means of the semi-implicit method (Vitousek and Fringer, 2013), in which the implicitness factor θ=0.5 is used. The model is second-order accurate in time for free-surface flows. More details about the model can be found in Ai et al. (2019).

      3. Model validation

      In this section, we validate the proposed model in resolving ship waves. The numerical experimental conditions are provided in Table 1 and Table 2. In Table 2, Case A with the current velocity of Uc = 0.0 m/s represents ship waves without current. Both Case B and Case C correspond to the cases in the presence of a following current, while Case D and Case E represent the cases in the presence of an opposing current. The current velocities are chosen based on the observed currents at 40.886° N, 121.812° E, which is in the Liaohe Estuary. The measured data were collected from 14:00 on September 18 (GMT + 08:00) to 19:00 on September 19 in 2021. The maximum flood velocity is 1.457 m/s, and the maximum ebb velocity is −1.478 m/s. The chosen current velocities are between the maximum flood velocity and the maximum ebb velocity.

      Table 1. Summary of ship speeds.

      CaseWater depth h (m)Ship speed Us (m/s)Froude number Fr′=Us/gh
      16.04.570.6
      26.05.350.7
      36.06.150.8
      46.06.900.9
      56.07.0930.925
      66.07.280.95
      76.07.4760.975
      86.07.861.025
      96.08.061.05
      106.08.2431.075
      116.08.451.1
      126.09.201.2
      136.09.971.3
      146.010.751.4
      156.011.501.5
      166.012.301.6
      176.013.051.7
      186.013.801.8
      196.014.601.9
      206.015.352.0

      Table 2. Summary of current velocities.

      CaseABCDE
      Current velocity
      Uc (m/s)
      0.00.51.0−0.5−1.0

      Notably, the Froude number Fr′=Us/gh presented in Table 1 is defined by the ship speed Us only and is different from the relative Froude number Fr when a uniform current is presented. According to the theory of Lee and Lee (2021), with the same relative Froude number, the cusp-line angles in the presence of a following or an opposing uniform current are identical to those without current. As a result, for the test cases presented in Table 1Table 2, all calculated cusp-line angles follow the analytical solution of Havelock (1908), when the relative Froude number Fr is introduced.

      As shown in Fig. 1, the dimensions of the computational domain are −420≤x≤420 m and −200≤y≤200 m, which are similar to those of David et al. (2017). The ship track follows the x axis and ranges from −384 m to 384 m. The ship hull is represented by Eq. (7), in which the length L and the beam B are set to 14.0 m and 7.0 m, respectively, and the peak pressure value is pm= 5000 Pa. In the numerical simulations, grid convergence tests reveal that the horizontal grid spacing of Δx=Δy= 1.0 m and two horizontal layers are adequate. The numerical results with different numbers of horizontal layers are shown in the Appendix.

      Fig. 1

      Fig. 2Fig. 3 compare the calculated cusp-line angles θc with the analytical solutions of Havelock (1908) for ship waves in the presence of a following uniform current and an opposing uniform current, respectively. The calculated cusp-line angles without current are also depicted in Fig. 2Fig. 3. All calculated cusp-line angles are in good agreement with the analytical solutions, except that the model tends to underpredict the cusp-line angle for 0.9<Fr<1.0. Notably, a similar underprediction of the cusp-line angle can also be found in David et al. (2017).

      Fig. 2
      Fig. 3

      4. Results and discussions

      This section presents the effects of a following current and opposing current on the maximum water level elevation and the leading wave period in the wave train based on the test cases presented in Table 1Table 2. Moreover, the response of the maximum water level elevation to the ship draft in the presence of a uniform current is examined.

      4.1. Effects of a following current on characteristic wave parameters

      To present the effect of a following current on the maximum wave height, the variations of the maximum water level elevation ηmax with the Froude number Fr′ at gauge points G1 and G2 are depicted in Fig. 4. The positions of gauge points G1 and G2 are shown in Fig. 1. The maximum water level elevation is an analogue to the maximum wave height and is presented in this study, because maximum wave heights at different positions away from the ship track vary throughout the wave train (David et al., 2017). In general, the variations of ηmax with the Froude number Fr′ in the three cases show a similar behavior, in which with the increase in Fr′, ηmax increases and then decreases. The presence of the following currents decreases ηmax for Fr′≤0.8 and Fr′≥1.2. Specifically, the following currents have a significant effect on ηmax for Fr′≤0.8. Notably, ηmax can be increased by the presence of the following currents for 0.9≤Fr′≤1.1. Compared with Case A, at location G1 ηmax is amplified 1.25 times at Fr′=0.925 in Case B and 1.31 times at Fr′=1.025 in Case C. Similarly, at location G2 ηmax is amplified 1.15 times at Fr′=1.025 in Case B and 1.11 times at Fr′=1.075 in Case C. The fact that ηmax can be increased by the presence of a following current for 0.9≤Fr′≤1.1 implies that if a following uniform current is neglected, then ηmax may be underestimated.

      Fig. 4

      To show the effect of a following current on the wave period, Fig. 5 depicts the variation of the leading wave period Tp in the wave train at gauge point G2 with the Froude number Fr′. Similar to David et al. (2017), Tp is defined by the wave period of the first wave with a leading trough in the wave train. The leading wave periods for Fr′= 0.6 and 0.7 were not given in Case B and Case C, because the leading wave heights for Fr′= 0.6 and 0.7 are too small to discern the leading wave periods. Compared with Case A, the presence of a following current leads to a larger Tp for 0.925≤Fr′≤1.1 and a smaller Tp for Fr′≥1.3. For Fr′= 0.8 and 0.9, Tp in Case B is larger than that in Case A and Tp in Case C is smaller than that in Case A. In all three cases, Tp decreases with increasing Fr′ for Fr′>1.0. However, this decreasing trend becomes very gentle after Fr′≥1.4. Notably, as shown in Fig. 5, Fr′=1.2 tends to be a transition point at which the following currents have a very limited effect on Tp. Moreover, before the transition point, Tp in Case B and Case C are larger than that in Case A (only for 0.925≤Fr′≤1.2), but after the transition point the reverse is true.

      Fig. 5

      As mentioned previously, the cusp-line angles for ship waves in the presence of a following or an opposing current are identical to those for ship waves only with the same relative Froude number Fr. However, with the same Fr, the characteristic parameters of ship waves in the presence of a following or an opposing current are quite different from those of ship waves without current. Fig. 6 shows the variations of the maximum water level elevation ηmax with Fr at gauge points G1 and G2 for ship waves in the presence of a following uniform current. Overall, the relationship curves between ηmax and Fr in Case B and Case C are lower than those in Case A. It is inferred that with the same Fr, ηmax in the presence of a following current is smaller than that without current. Fig. 7 shows the variation of the leading wave period Tp in the wave train at gauge point G2 with Fr for ship waves in the presence of a following uniform current. The overall relationship curves between Tp and Fr in Case B and Case C are also lower than those in Case A for 0.9≤Fr≤2.0. It can be inferred that with the same Fr, Tp in the presence of a following current is smaller than that without current for Fr≥0.9.

      Fig. 6
      Fig. 7

      To compare the numerical results between the case of ship waves only and the case of ship waves in the presence of a following current with the same Fr, Fig. 8 shows the wave patterns for Fr=1.2. To obtain the case of ship waves in the presence of a following current with Fr=1.2, the ship speed Us=9.7 m/s and the current velocity Uc=0.5 m/s are adopted. Fig. 8 indicates that both the calculated cusp-line angles for the case of Us=9.2 m/s and Uc=0.0 m/s and the case of Us=9.7 m/s and Uc=0.5 m/s are equal to 56.5°, which follows the theory of Lee and Lee (2021)Fig. 9 depicts the comparison of the time histories of the free surface elevation at gauge point G2 for Fr=1.2 between the case of ship waves only and the case of ship waves in the presence of a following current. The time when the ship wave just arrived at gauge point G2 is defined as t′=0. Both the maximum water level elevation and the leading wave period in the case of Us=9.2 m/s and Uc=0.0 m/s are larger than those in the case of Us=9.7 m/s and Uc=0.5 m/s, which is consistent with the inferences based on Fig. 6Fig. 7.

      Fig. 8
      Fig. 8. Comparison of the wave pattern for Fr=1.2: (a) Ship wave only; (b) Ship wave in the presence of a following current.
      Fig. 9
      Fig. 9. Comparison of the time histories of the free surface elevation at gauge point G2 for between case of ship waves only and case of ship waves in the presence of a following current.

      Fig. 10 shows the response of the maximum water level elevation ηmax to the ship draft at gauge point G2 for Fr′= 1.2 in the presence of a following uniform current. pm ranges from 2500 Pa to 40,000 Pa with an interval of Δp= 2500 Pa pm0= 2500 Pa represents a reference case. ηmax0 denotes the maximum water level elevation corresponding to the case of pm0= 2500 Pa. The best-fit linear trend lines obtained by linear regression analysis for the three responses are also depicted in Fig. 10. In general, all responses of ηmax to the ship draft show a linear relationship. The coefficients of determination for the three linear trend lines are R2= 0.9901, 0.9941 and 0.9991 for Case A, Case B and Case C, respectively. R2 is used to measure how close the numerical results are to the linear trend lines. The closer R2 is to 1.0, the more linear the numerical results tend to be. As a result, the relationship curve between ηmax and the ship draft in the presence of a following uniform current tends to be more linear than that without current. Notably, with the increase in pmpm0, ηmax increases faster in Case B and Case C than Case A. This implies that neglecting the following currents can lead to the underestimation of the response of ηmax to the ship draft.

      Fig. 10

      4.2. Effects of an opposing current on characteristic wave parameters

      Fig. 11 shows the variations of the maximum water level elevation ηmax with the Froude number Fr′ at gauge points G1 and G2 for ship waves in the presence of an opposing uniform current. The presence of opposing uniform currents leads to a significant reduction in ηmax at the two gauge points for 0.6≤Fr′≤2.0. Especially for Fr′=0.6, the decrease in ηmax is up to 73.8% in Case D and 78.4% in Case E at location G1 and up to 93.8% in Case D and 95.3% in Case E at location G2 when compared with Case A. Fig. 12 shows the variations of the leading wave period Tp at gauge point G2 with the Froude number Fr′ for ship waves in the presence of an opposing uniform current. The leading wave periods for Fr′= 0.6 and 0.7 were also not provided in Case D and Case E due to the small leading wave heights. In general, Tp decreases with increasing Fr′ in Case D and Case E for 0.8≤Fr′≤2.0. Tp in Case D and Case E are larger than that in Case A for Fr′≥1.0.

      Fig. 11
      Fig. 12

      Fig. 13 depicts the variations of the maximum water level elevation ηmax with the relative Froude number Fr at gauge points G1 and G2 for ship waves in the presence of an opposing uniform current. Similar to Case B and Case C shown in Fig. 6, the overall relationship curves between ηmax and Fr in Case D and Case E are lower than those in Case A. This implies that with the same Fr, ηmax in the presence of an opposing current is also smaller than that without current. Fig. 14 depicts the variations of the leading wave period Tp in the wave train at gauge point G2 with Fr for ship waves in the presence of an opposing uniform current. Similar to Case B and Case C shown in Fig. 7, the overall relationship curves between Tp and Fr in Case D and Case E are lower than those in Case A for 0.9≤Fr≤2.0. This also implies that with the same Fr, Tp in the presence of an opposing current is smaller than that without current.

      Fig. 13
      Fig. 14

      Fig. 15 shows a comparison of the wave pattern for Fr=1.2 between the case of ship waves only and the case of ship waves in the presence of an opposing current. The case of the ship wave in the presence of an opposing current with Fr=1.2 is obtained by setting the ship speed Us=8.7 m/s and the current velocity Uc=−0.5 m/s. As expected (Lee and Lee, 2021), both calculated cusp-line angles are identical. Fig. 16 depicts the comparison of the time histories of the free surface elevation at gauge point G2 for Fr=1.2 between the case of ship waves only and the case of ship waves in the presence of an opposing current. The maximum water level elevation in the case of Us=9.2 m/s and Uc=0.0 m/s is larger than that in the case of Us=8.7 m/s and Uc=−0.5 m/s, while the reverse is true for the leading wave period. Fig. 16 is consistent with the inferences based on Fig. 13Fig. 14.

      Fig. 15
      Fig. 16

      Fig. 17 depicts the response of the maximum water level elevation ηmax to the ship draft at gauge point G2 for Fr′= 1.2 in the presence of an opposing uniform current. Similarly, the response of ηmax to the ship draft in the presence of an opposing uniform current shows a linear relationship. The coefficients of determination for the three linear trend lines are R2= 0.9901, 0.9955 and 0.9987 for Case A, Case D and Case E, respectively. This indicates that the relationship curve between ηmax and the ship draft in the presence of an opposing uniform current also tends to be more linear than that without current. In addition, ηmax increases faster with increasing pmpm0 in Case D and Case E than Case A, implying that the response of ηmax to the ship draft can also be underestimated by neglecting opposing currents.

      Fig. 17

      5. Conclusions

      A non-hydrostatic model incorporating a moving pressure field method was used to investigate characteristic wave parameters for ship waves in the presence of a uniform current. The calculated cusp-line angles for ship waves in the presence of a following or an opposing uniform current were in good agreement with analytical solutions, demonstrating that the proposed model can accurately resolve ship waves in the presence of a uniform current.

      The model results showed that the presence of a following current can result in an increase in the maximum water level elevation ηmax for 0.9≤Fr′≤1.1, while the presence of an opposing current leads to a significant reduction in ηmax for 0.6≤Fr′≤2.0. The leading wave period Tp can be increased for 0.925≤Fr′≤1.2 and reduced for Fr′≥1.3 due to the presence of a following current. However, the presence of an opposing current leads to an increase in Tp for Fr′≥1.0.

      Although with the same relative Froude number Fr, the cusp-line angles for ship waves in the presence of a following or an opposing current are identical to those for ship waves without current, the maximum water level elevation ηmax and leading wave period Tp in the presence of a following or an opposing current are quite different from those without current. The present model results imply that with the same Fr, ηmax in the presence of a following or an opposing current is smaller than that without current for Fr≥0.6, and Tp in the presence of a following or an opposing current is smaller than that without current for Fr≥0.9.

      The response of ηmax to the ship draft in the presence of a following current or an opposing current is similar to that without current and shows a linear relationship. However, the presence of a following or an opposing uniform current results in more linear responses of ηmax to the ship draft. Moreover, more rapid responses of ηmax to the ship draft are obtained when a following current or an opposing current is presented. This implies that the response of ηmax to the ship draft in the presence of a following current or an opposing current can be underestimated if the uniform current is neglected.

      The present results have implications for ships sailing across estuarine and coastal environments, where river flows or tidal flows are significant. In these environments, ship waves can be larger than expected and the response of the maximum water level elevation to the ship draft may be more remarkable. The effect of a uniform current should be considered in the analysis of ship waves.

      The present study considered only slender-body type ships. For different hull shapes, the effects of a uniform current on characteristic wave parameters need to be further investigated. Moreover, the effects of an oblique uniform current on ship waves need to be examined in future work.

      CRediT authorship contribution statement

      Congfang Ai: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition. Yuxiang Ma: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. Lei Sun: Conceptualization, Methodology. Guohai Dong: Supervision, Funding acquisition.

      Declaration of competing interest

      The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

      Acknowledgments

      This research is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 521712485172010501051979029), LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (Grant No. XLYC1807010) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. DUT21LK01).

      Appendix. Numerical results with different numbers of horizontal layers

      Fig. 18 shows comparisons of the time histories of the free surface elevation at gauge point G1 for Case B and Fr′= 1.2 between the three sets of numerical results with different numbers of horizontal layers. The maximum water level elevations ηmax obtained by Nz= 3 and 4 are 0.24% and 0.35% larger than ηmax with Nz= 2, respectively. Correspondingly, the leading wave periods Tp obtained by Nz= 3 and 4 are 0.45% and 0.55% larger than Tp with Nz= 2, respectively. In general, the three sets of numerical results are very close. To reduce the computational cost, two horizontal layers Nz= 2 were chosen for this study.

      Fig. 18

      Data availability

      Data will be made available on request.

      References

      Ai et al., 2019

      C. Ai, Y. Ma, C. Yuan, G. Dong

      Development and assessment of semi-implicit nonhydrostatic models for surface water waves

      Ocean Model., 144 (2019), Article 101489

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarAlmström et al., 2021

      B. Almström, D. Roelvink, M. Larson

      Predicting ship waves in sheltered waterways – an application of XBeach to the Stockholm Archipelago, Sweden

      Coast. Eng., 170 (2021), Article 104026

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarBayraktar and Beji, 2013

      D. Bayraktar, S. Beji

      Numerical simulation of waves generated by a moving pressure field

      Ocean Eng., 59 (2013), pp. 231-239

      Google ScholarBenjamin et al., 2017

      K. Benjamin, B.K. Smelzer, S.A. Ellingsen

      Surface waves on currents with arbitrary vertical shear

      Phys. Fluids, 29 (2017), Article 047102

      Google ScholarDam et al., 2008

      K.T. Dam, K. Tanimoto, E. Fatimah

      Investigation of ship waves in a narrow channel

      J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 13 (2008), pp. 223-230 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarDavid et al., 2017

      C.G. David, V. Roeber, N. Goseberg, T. Schlurmann

      Generation and propagation of ship-borne waves – solutions from a Boussinesq-type model

      Coast. Eng., 127 (2017), pp. 170-187

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholarde Ridder et al., 2020

      M.P. de Ridder, P.B. Smit, A. van Dongeren, R. McCall, K. Nederhoff, A.J.H.M. Reniers

      Efficient two-layer non-hydrostatic wave model with accurate dispersive behaviour

      Coast. Eng., 164 (2020), Article 103808

      Google ScholarDempwolff et al., 2022

      L.-C. Dempwolff, G. Melling, C. Windt, O. Lojek, T. Martin, I. Holzwarth, H. Bihs, N. Goseberg

      Loads and effects of ship-generated, drawdown waves in confined waterways – a review of current knowledge and methods

      J. Coast. Hydraul. Struct., 2 (2022), pp. 2-46

      Google ScholarEllingsen, 2014

      S.A. Ellingsen

      Ship waves in the presence of uniform vorticity

      J. Fluid Mech., 742 (2014), p. R2

      View Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarErtekin et al., 1986

      R.C. Ertekin, W.C. Webster, J.V. Wehausen

      Waves caused by a moving disturbance in a shallow channel of finite width

      J. Fluid Mech., 169 (1986), pp. 275-292

      View Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarGrue, 2017

      J. Grue

      Ship generated mini-tsunamis

      J. Fluid Mech., 816 (2017), pp. 142-166 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarGrue, 2020

      J. Grue

      Mini-tsunamis made by ship moving across a depth change

      J. Waterw. Port, Coast. Ocean Eng., 146 (2020), Article 04020023

      View Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarGourlay, 2001

      T.P. Gourlay

      The supercritical bore produced by a high-speed ship in a channel

      J. Fluid Mech., 434 (2001), pp. 399-409 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarHavelock, 1908

      T.H. Havelock

      The propagation of groups of waves in dispersive media with application to waves on water produced by a travelling disturbance

      Proc. Royal Soc. London Series A (1908), pp. 398-430

      Google ScholarLee and Lee, 2019

      B.W. Lee, C. Lee

      Equation for ship wave crests in the entire range of water depths

      Coast. Eng., 153 (2019), Article 103542

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarLee and Lee, 2021

      B.W. Lee, C. Lee

      Equation for ship wave crests in a uniform current in the entire range of water depths

      Coast. Eng., 167 (2021), Article 103900

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarLi and Ellingsen, 2016

      Y. Li, S.A. Ellingsen

      Ship waves on uniform shear current at finite depth: wave resistance and critical velocity

      J. Fluid Mech., 791 (2016), pp. 539-567 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarLi et al., 2019

      Y. Li, B.K. Smeltzer, S.A. Ellingsen

      Transient wave resistance upon a real shear current

      Eur. J. Mech. B Fluid, 73 (2019), pp. 180-192

      ArticleDownload PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarMa, 2012

      H. Ma

      Passing Ship Effects in a 2DH Non- Hydrostatic Flow Model

      UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands (2012)

      Google ScholarSamaras and Karambas, 2021

      A.G. Samaras, T.V. Karambas

      Numerical simulation of ship-borne waves using a 2DH post-Boussinesq model

      Appl. Math. Model., 89 (2021), pp. 1547-1556

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarShi et al., 2018

      F. Shi, M. Malej, J.M. Smith, J.T. Kirby

      Breaking of ship bores in a Boussinesq-type ship-wake model

      Coast. Eng., 132 (2018), pp. 1-12

      ArticleDownload PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarVitousek and Fringer, 2013

      S. Vitousek, O.B. Fringer

      Stability and consistency of nonhydrostatic free-surface models using the semi-implicit θ-method

      Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluid., 72 (2013), pp. 550-582 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar

      Numerical analysis of energy dissipator options using computational fluid dynamics modeling — a case study of Mirani Dam

      전산 유체 역학 모델링을 사용한 에너지 소산자 옵션의 수치적 해석 — Mirani 댐의 사례 연구

      Arabian Journal of Geosciences volume 15, Article number: 1614 (2022) Cite this article

      Abstract

      이 연구에서 FLOW 3D 전산 유체 역학(CFD) 소프트웨어를 사용하여 파키스탄 Mirani 댐 방수로에 대한 에너지 소산 옵션으로 미국 매립지(USBR) 유형 II 및 USBR 유형 III 유역의 성능을 추정했습니다. 3D Reynolds 평균 Navier-Stokes 방정식이 해결되었으며, 여기에는 여수로 위의 자유 표면 흐름을 캡처하기 위해 공기 유입, 밀도 평가 및 드리프트-플럭스에 대한 하위 그리드 모델이 포함되었습니다. 본 연구에서는 5가지 모델을 고려하였다. 첫 번째 모델에는 길이가 39.5m인 USBR 유형 II 정수기가 있습니다. 두 번째 모델에는 길이가 44.2m인 USBR 유형 II 정수기가 있습니다. 3번째와 4 번째모델에는 길이가 각각 48.8m인 USBR 유형 II 정수조와 39.5m의 USBR 유형 III 정수조가 있습니다. 다섯 번째 모델은 네 번째 모델과 동일하지만 마찰 및 슈트 블록 높이가 0.3m 증가했습니다. 최상의 FLOW 3D 모델 조건을 설정하기 위해 메쉬 민감도 분석을 수행했으며 메쉬 크기 0.9m에서 최소 오차를 산출했습니다. 세 가지 경계 조건 세트가 테스트되었으며 최소 오류를 제공하는 세트가 사용되었습니다. 수치적 검증은 USBR 유형 II( L = 48.8m), USBR 유형 III( L = 35.5m) 및 USBR 유형 III 의 물리적 모델 에너지 소산을 0.3m 블록 단위로 비교하여 수행되었습니다( L= 35.5m). 통계 분석 결과 평균 오차는 2.5%, RMSE(제곱 평균 제곱근 오차) 지수는 3% 미만이었습니다. 수리학적 및 경제성 분석을 바탕으로 4 번째 모델이 최적화된 에너지 소산기로 밝혀졌습니다. 흡수된 에너지 백분율 측면에서 물리적 모델과 수치적 모델 간의 최대 차이는 5% 미만인 것으로 나타났습니다.

      In this study, the FLOW 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software was used to estimate the performance of the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) type II and USBR type III stilling basins as energy dissipation options for the Mirani Dam spillway, Pakistan. The 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations were solved, which included sub-grid models for air entrainment, density evaluation, and drift–flux, to capture free-surface flow over the spillway. Five models were considered in this research. The first model has a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 39.5 m. The second model has a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 44.2 m. The 3rd and 4th models have a USBR type II stilling basin with a length of 48.8 m and a 39.5 m USBR type III stilling basin, respectively. The fifth model is identical to the fourth, but the friction and chute block heights have been increased by 0.3 m. To set up the best FLOW 3D model conditions, mesh sensitivity analysis was performed, which yielded a minimum error at a mesh size of 0.9 m. Three sets of boundary conditions were tested and the set that gave the minimum error was employed. Numerical validation was done by comparing the physical model energy dissipation of USBR type II (L = 48.8 m), USBR type III (L =35.5 m), and USBR type III with 0.3-m increments in blocks (L = 35.5 m). The statistical analysis gave an average error of 2.5% and a RMSE (root mean square error) index of less than 3%. Based on hydraulics and economic analysis, the 4th model was found to be an optimized energy dissipator. The maximum difference between the physical and numerical models in terms of percentage energy absorbed was found to be less than 5%.

      Keywords

      • Numerical modeling
      • Spillway
      • Hydraulic jump
      • Energy dissipation
      • FLOW 3D

      References

      • Abbasi S, Fatemi S, Ghaderi A, Di Francesco S (2021) The effect of geometric parameters of the antivortex on a triangular labyrinth side weir. Water (Switzerland) 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010014
      • Amorim JCC, Amante RCR, Barbosa VD (2015) Experimental and numerical modeling of flow in a stilling basin. Proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress 28 June–3 July, the Hague, the Netherlands, 1, 1–6
      • Asaram D, Deepamkar G, Singh G, Vishal K, Akshay K (2016) Energy dissipation by using different slopes of ogee spillway. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci 4(3):18–22Google Scholar 
      • Boes RM, Hager WH (2003) Hydraulic design of stepped spillways. J Hydraul Eng 129(9):671–679. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:9(671)Article Google Scholar 
      • Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 130(7):0780011–0780014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953Article Google Scholar 
      • Chen Q, Dai G, Liu H (2002) Volume of fluid model for turbulence numerical simulation of stepped spillway overflow. J Hydraul Eng 128(7):683–688. 10.1061/共ASCE兲0733-9429共2002兲128:7共683兲 CE
      • Damiron R (2015) CFD modelling of dam spillway aerator. Lund University Sweden
      • Dunlop SL, Willig IA, Paul GE (2016) Cabinet Gorge Dam spillway modifications for TDG abatement – design evolution and field performance. 6th International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures: Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, ISHS 2016, 3650628160, 460–470. 10.15142/T3650628160853
      • Fleit G, Baranya S, Bihs H (2018) CFD modeling of varied flow conditions over an ogee-weir. Period Polytech Civ Eng 62(1):26–32. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.10821Article Google Scholar 
      • Frizell KW, Frizell KH (2015) Guidelines for hydraulic design of stepped spillways. Hydraulic Laboratory Report HL-2015-06, May
      • Ghaderi A, Abbasi S (2021) Experimental and numerical study of the effects of geometric appendance elements on energy dissipation over stepped spillway. Water (Switzerland) 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070957
      • Ghaderi A, Dasineh M, Aristodemo F, Ghahramanzadeh A (2020) Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps over different macroroughnesses. J Hydroinform 22(6):1554–1572. https://doi.org/10.2166/HYDRO.2020.298Article Google Scholar 
      • Güven A, Mahmood AH (2021) Numerical investigation of flow characteristics over stepped spillways. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 21(3):1344–1355. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.283Article Google Scholar 
      • Herrera-Granados O, Kostecki SW (2016) Numerical and physical modeling of water flow over the ogee weir of the new Niedów barrage. J Hydrol Hydromech 64(1):67–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2016-0013Article Google Scholar 
      • Ho DKH, Riddette KM (2010) Application of computational fluid dynamics to evaluate hydraulic performance of spillways in australia. Aust J Civ Eng 6(1):81–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2010.11463946Article Google Scholar 
      • Kocaer Ö, Yarar A (2020) Experimental and numerical investigation of flow over ogee spillway. Water Resour Manag 34(13):3949–3965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02558-9Article Google Scholar 
      • Kumcu SY (2017) Investigation of flow over spillway modeling and comparison between experimental data and CFD analysis. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(3):994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1257-zArticle Google Scholar 
      • Li S, Li Q, Yang J (2019) CFD modelling of a stepped spillway with various step layouts. Math Prob Eng 2019:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6215739Article Google Scholar 
      • Muthukumaran N, Prince Arulraj G (2020) Experimental investigation on augmenting the discharge over ogee spillways with nanocement. Civ Eng Archit 8(5):838–845. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2020.080511Article Google Scholar 
      • Naderi V, Farsadizadeh D, Lin C, Gaskin S (2019) A 3D study of an air-core vortex using HSPIV and flow visualization. Arab J Sci Eng 44(10):8573–8584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03764-3Article Google Scholar 
      • Nangare PB, Kote AS (2017) Experimental investigation of an ogee stepped spillway with plain and slotted roller bucket for energy dissipation. Int J Civ Eng Technol 8(8):1549–1555Google Scholar 
      • Parsaie A, Moradinejad A, Haghiabi AH (2018) Numerical modeling of flow pattern in spillway approach channel. Jordan J Civ Eng 12(1):1–9Google Scholar 
      • Pasbani Khiavi M, Ali Ghorbani M, Yusefi M (2021) Numerical investigation of the energy dissipation process in stepped spillways using finite volume method. J Irrig Water Eng 11(4):22–37Google Scholar 
      • Peng Y, Zhang X, Yuan H, Li X, Xie C, Yang S, Bai Z (2019) Energy dissipation in stepped spillways with different horizontal face angles. Energies 12(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234469
      • Raza A, Wan W, Mehmood K (2021) Stepped spillway slope effect on air entrainment and inception point location. Water (Switzerland) 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101428
      • Reeve DE, Zuhaira AA, Karunarathna H (2019) Computational investigation of hydraulic performance variation with geometry in gabion stepped spillways. Water Sci Eng 12(1):62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2019.04.002Article Google Scholar 
      • Rice CE, Kadavy KC (1996) Model study of a roller compacted concrete stepped spillway. J Hydraul Eng 122(6):292–297. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1996)122:6(292)Article Google Scholar 
      • Rong Y, Zhang T, Peng L, Feng P (2019) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dam discharge and flood routing in Wudu reservoir. Water (Switzerland) 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102157
      • Saqib N, Akbar M, Pan H, Ou G, Mohsin M, Ali A, Amin A (2022) Numerical analysis of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across stepped spillways having curved risers. Appl Sci 12(448):1–18Google Scholar 
      • Saqib N, Ansari K, Babar M (2021) Analysis of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across stepped spillways having curved treads using computational fluid dynamics. Intl Conf Adv Mech Eng :1–10
      • Saqib Nu, Akbar M, Huali P, Guoqiang O (2022) Numerical investigation of pressure profiles and energy dissipation across the stepped spillway having curved treads using FLOW 3D. Arab J Geosci 15(1):1363–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10505-8Article Google Scholar 
      • Sarkardeh H, Marosi M, Roshan R (2015) Stepped spillway optimization through numerical and physical modeling. Int J Energy Environ 6(6):597–606Google Scholar 
      • Serafeim A, Avgeris V, Hrissanthou V (2015) Experimental and numerical modeling of flow over a spillway. Eur Water Publ 14(2015):55–59. https://doi.org/10.15224/978-1-63248-042-2-11Article Google Scholar 
      • Sorensen RM (1986) Stepped spillway model investigation. J Hydraul Eng I(12):1461–1472. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-
      • Tabbara M, Chatila J, Awwad R (2005) Computational simulation of flow over stepped spillways. Comput Struct 83(27):2215–2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.04.005Article Google Scholar 
      • Valero D, Bung DB, Crookston BM, Matos J (2016) Numerical investigation of USBR type III stilling basin performance downstream of smooth and stepped spillways. 6th International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures: Hydraulic Structures and Water System Management, ISHS 2016, 3406281608, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.15142/T340628160853
      • Versteeg H, Malalasekera W (1979) An introduction to computational fluid mechanics. (Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(80)90010-7
      • WAPDA model studies cell, IRI Lahore (2003) Mirani Dam Project hydraulic model studies for the spillway. November 2003
      • Yakhot V, Orszag S (1986) Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. J Sci Comput 1(1):3–51Article Google Scholar 

      이종 금속 인터커넥트의 펄스 레이저 용접을 위한 가공 매개변수 최적화

      Optimization of processing parameters for pulsed laser welding of dissimilar metal interconnects

      본 논문은 독자의 편의를 위해 기계번역된 내용이어서 자세한 내용은 원문을 참고하시기 바랍니다.

      NguyenThi TienaYu-LungLoabM.Mohsin RazaaCheng-YenChencChi-PinChiuc

      aNational Cheng Kung University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tainan, Taiwan

      bNational Cheng Kung University, Academy of Innovative Semiconductor and Sustainable Manufacturing, Tainan, Taiwan

      cJum-bo Co., Ltd, Xinshi District, Tainan, Taiwan

      Abstract

      워블 전략이 포함된 펄스 레이저 용접(PLW) 방법을 사용하여 알루미늄 및 구리 이종 랩 조인트의 제조를 위한 최적의 가공 매개변수에 대해 실험 및 수치 조사가 수행됩니다. 피크 레이저 출력과 접선 용접 속도의 대표적인 조합 43개를 선택하기 위해 원형 패킹 설계 알고리즘이 먼저 사용됩니다.

      선택한 매개변수는 PLW 프로세스의 전산유체역학(CFD) 모델에 제공되어 용융 풀 형상(즉, 인터페이스 폭 및 침투 깊이) 및 구리 농도를 예측합니다. 시뮬레이션 결과는 설계 공간 내에서 PLW 매개변수의 모든 조합에 대한 용융 풀 형상 및 구리 농도를 예측하기 위해 3개의 대리 모델을 교육하는 데 사용됩니다.

      마지막으로, 대체 모델을 사용하여 구성된 처리 맵은 용융 영역에 균열이나 기공이 없고 향상된 기계적 및 전기적 특성이 있는 이종 조인트를 생성하는 PLW 매개변수를 결정하기 위해 세 가지 품질 기준에 따라 필터링됩니다.

      제안된 최적화 접근법의 타당성은 최적의 용접 매개변수를 사용하여 생성된 실험 샘플의 전단 강도, 금속간 화합물(IMC) 형성 및 전기 접촉 저항을 평가하여 입증됩니다.

      결과는 최적의 매개변수가 1209N의 높은 전단 강도와 86µΩ의 낮은 전기 접촉 저항을 생성함을 확인합니다. 또한 용융 영역에는 균열 및 기공과 같은 결함이 없습니다.

      An experimental and numerical investigation is performed into the optimal processing parameters for the fabrication of aluminum and copper dissimilar lap joints using a pulsed laser welding (PLW) method with a wobble strategy. A circle packing design algorithm is first employed to select 43 representative combinations of the peak laser power and tangential welding speed. The selected parameters are then supplied to a computational fluidic dynamics (CFD) model of the PLW process to predict the melt pool geometry (i.e., interface width and penetration depth) and copper concentration. The simulation results are used to train three surrogate models to predict the melt pool geometry and copper concentration for any combination of the PLW parameters within the design space. Finally, the processing maps constructed using the surrogate models are filtered in accordance with three quality criteria to determine the PLW parameters that produce dissimilar joints with no cracks or pores in the fusion zone and enhanced mechanical and electrical properties. The validity of the proposed optimization approach is demonstrated by evaluating the shear strength, intermetallic compound (IMC) formation, and electrical contact resistance of experimental samples produced using the optimal welding parameters. The results confirm that the optimal parameters yield a high shear strength of 1209 N and a low electrical contact resistance of 86 µΩ. Moreover, the fusion zone is free of defects, such as cracks and pores.

      Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of Al-Cu lap-joint arrangement
      Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of Al-Cu lap-joint arrangement
      Fig. 2. Machine setup (MFQS-150W_1500W
      Fig. 2. Machine setup (MFQS-150W_1500W
      Fig. 5. Lap-shear mechanical tests: (a) experimental setup and specimen dimensions, and (b) two different failures of lap-joint welding.
N. Thi Tien et al.
      Fig. 5. Lap-shear mechanical tests: (a) experimental setup and specimen dimensions, and (b) two different failures of lap-joint welding. N. Thi Tien et al.
      Fig. 9. Simulation and experimental results for melt pool profile. (a) Simulation results for melt pool cross-section, and (b) OM image of melt pool cross-section.
(Note that laser processing parameter of 830 W and 565 mm/s is chosen.).
      Fig. 9. Simulation and experimental results for melt pool profile. (a) Simulation results for melt pool cross-section, and (b) OM image of melt pool cross-section. (Note that laser processing parameter of 830 W and 565 mm/s is chosen.).

      References

      [1]

      G. Santos

      Road transport and CO2 emissions: What are the challenges?

      Transport Policy, 59 (2017), pp. 71-74

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[2]

      A. Das, D. Li, D. Williams, D. Greenwood

      Joining technologies for automotive battery systems manufacturing

      World Electric Veh. J., 9 (2) (2018), p. 22 View PDF

      CrossRefGoogle Scholar[3]

      M. Zwicker, M. Moghadam, W. Zhang, C. Nielsen

      Automotive battery pack manufacturing–a review of battery to tab joining

      J. Adv. Joining Process., 1 (2020), Article 100017

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[4]

      T. Mai, A. Spowage

      Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steel–kovar, copper–steel and copper–aluminium

      Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 374 (1–2) (2004), pp. 224-233

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[5]

      S.S. Lee, T.H. Kim, S.J. Hu, W.W. Cai, J. Li, J.A. Abell

      Characterization of joint quality in ultrasonic welding of battery tabs

      International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, vol. 54990, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2012), pp. 249-261

      Google Scholar[6]

      Y. Zhou, P. Gorman, W. Tan, K. Ely

      Weldability of thin sheet metals during small-scale resistance spot welding using an alternating-current power supply

      J. Electron. Mater., 29 (9) (2000), pp. 1090-1099 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[7]

      S. Katayama

      Handbook of laser welding technologies

      Elsevier (2013)

      Google Scholar[8]

      A. Sadeghian, N. Iqbal

      A review on dissimilar laser welding of steel-copper, steel-aluminum, aluminum-copper, and steel-nickel for electric vehicle battery manufacturing

      Opt. Laser Technol., 146 (2022), Article 107595

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[9]

      M.J. Brand, P.A. Schmidt, M.F. Zaeh, A. Jossen

      Welding techniques for battery cells and resulting electrical contact resistances

      J. Storage Mater., 1 (2015), pp. 7-14

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[10]

      M. Jarwitz, F. Fetzer, R. Weber, T. Graf

      Weld seam geometry and electrical resistance of laser-welded, aluminum-copper dissimilar joints produced with spatial beam oscillation

      Metals, 8 (7) (2018), p. 510 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[11]S. Smith, J. Blackburn, M. Gittos, P. de Bono, and P. Hilton, “Welding of dissimilar metallic materials using a scanned laser beam,” in International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, 2013, vol. 2013, no. 1: Laser Institute of America, pp. 493-502.

      Google Scholar[12]

      P. Schmitz, J.B. Habedank, M.F. Zaeh

      Spike laser welding for the electrical connection of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries

      J. Laser Appl., 30 (1) (2018), Article 012004 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[13]

      P. Kah, C. Vimalraj, J. Martikainen, R. Suoranta

      Factors influencing Al-Cu weld properties by intermetallic compound formation

      Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng., 10 (1) (2015), pp. 1-13

      Google Scholar[14]

      Z. Lei, X. Zhang, J. Liu, P. Li

      Interfacial microstructure and reaction mechanism with various weld fillers on laser welding-brazing of Al/Cu lap joint

      J. Manuf. Process., 67 (2021), pp. 226-240

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[15]

      T. Solchenbach, P. Plapper

      Mechanical characteristics of laser braze-welded aluminium–copper connections

      Opt. Laser Technol., 54 (2013), pp. 249-256

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[16]

      T. Solchenbach, P. Plapper, W. Cai

      Electrical performance of laser braze-welded aluminum–copper interconnects

      J. Manuf. Process., 16 (2) (2014), pp. 183-189

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[17]

      S.J. Lee, H. Nakamura, Y. Kawahito, S. Katayama

      Effect of welding speed on microstructural and mechanical properties of laser lap weld joints in dissimilar Al and Cu sheets

      Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 19 (2) (2014), pp. 111-118

      Google Scholar[18]

      Z. Xue, S. Hu, D. Zuo, W. Cai, D. Lee, K.-A. Elijah Jr

      Molten pool characterization of laser lap welded copper and aluminum

      J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 46 (49) (2013), Article 495501 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[19]

      S. Zhao, G. Yu, X. He, Y. Zhang, W. Ning

      Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of laser overlap welding of Ti6Al4V and 42CrMo

      J. Mater. Process. Technol., 211 (3) (2011), pp. 530-537

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[20]

      W. Huang, H. Wang, T. Rinker, W. Tan

      Investigation of metal mixing in laser keyhole welding of dissimilar metals

      Mater. Des., 195 (2020), Article 109056

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[21]

      E. Kaiser, G. Ambrosy, E. Papastathopoulos

      Welding strategies for joining copper and aluminum by fast oscillating, high quality laser beam

      High-Power Laser Materials Processing: Applications, Diagnostics, and Systems IX, vol. 11273, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2020), p. 112730C

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[22]

      V. Dimatteo, A. Ascari, A. Fortunato

      Continuous laser welding with spatial beam oscillation of dissimilar thin sheet materials (Al-Cu and Cu-Al): Process optimization and characterization

      J. Manuf. Process., 44 (2019), pp. 158-165

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[23]

      V. Dimatteo, A. Ascari, E. Liverani, A. Fortunato

      Experimental investigation on the effect of spot diameter on continuous-wave laser welding of copper and aluminum thin sheets for battery manufacturing

      Opt. Laser Technol., 145 (2022), Article 107495

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[24]

      D. Wu, X. Hua, F. Li, L. Huang

      Understanding of spatter formation in fiber laser welding of 5083 aluminum alloy

      Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 113 (2017), pp. 730-740

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[25]

      R. Ducharme, K. Williams, P. Kapadia, J. Dowden, B. Steen, M. Glowacki

      The laser welding of thin metal sheets: an integrated keyhole and weld pool model with supporting experiments

      J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 27 (8) (1994), p. 1619 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[26]

      C.W. Hirt, B.D. Nichols

      Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries

      J. Comput. Phys., 39 (1) (1981), pp. 201-225

      ArticleDownload PDFGoogle Scholar[27]

      W. Piekarska, M. Kubiak

      Three-dimensional model for numerical analysis of thermal phenomena in laser–arc hybrid welding process

      Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 54 (23–24) (2011), pp. 4966-4974

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[28]J. Zhou, H.-L. Tsai, and P.-C. Wang, “Transport phenomena and keyhole dynamics during pulsed laser welding,” 2006.

      Google Scholar[29]

      D. Harrison, D. Yan, S. Blairs

      The surface tension of liquid copper

      J. Chem. Thermodyn., 9 (12) (1977), pp. 1111-1119

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[30]

      M. Leitner, T. Leitner, A. Schmon, K. Aziz, G. Pottlacher

      Thermophysical properties of liquid aluminum

      Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 48 (6) (2017), pp. 3036-3045 View PDF

      This article is free to access.

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[31]

      H.-C. Tran, Y.-L. Lo

      Systematic approach for determining optimal processing parameters to produce parts with high density in selective laser melting process

      Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 105 (10) (2019), pp. 4443-4460 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[32]A. Ascari, A. Fortunato, E. Liverani, and A. Lutey, “Application of different pulsed laser sources to dissimilar welding of Cu and Al alloys,” in Proceedings of Lasers in Manufacturing Conference (LIM), 2019.

      Google Scholar[33]

      A. Fortunato, A. Ascari

      Laser welding of thin copper and aluminum sheets: feasibility and challenges in continuous-wave welding of dissimilar metals

      Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 6 (2) (2019), pp. 136-157 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[34]

      A. Boucherit, M.-N. Avettand-Fènoël, R. Taillard

      Effect of a Zn interlayer on dissimilar FSSW of Al and Cu

      Mater. Des., 124 (2017), pp. 87-99

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[35]

      N. Kumar, I. Masters, A. Das

      In-depth evaluation of laser-welded similar and dissimilar material tab-to-busbar electrical interconnects for electric vehicle battery pack

      J. Manuf. Process., 70 (2021), pp. 78-96

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[36]

      M. Abbasi, A.K. Taheri, M. Salehi

      Growth rate of intermetallic compounds in Al/Cu bimetal produced by cold roll welding process

      J. Alloy. Compd., 319 (1–2) (2001), pp. 233-241

      ArticleDownload PDFGoogle Scholar[37]

      D. Zuo, S. Hu, J. Shen, Z. Xue

      Intermediate layer characterization and fracture behavior of laser-welded copper/aluminum metal joints

      Mater. Des., 58 (2014), pp. 357-362

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[38]

      S. Yan, Y. Shi

      Influence of Ni interlayer on microstructure and mechanical properties of laser welded joint of Al/Cu bimetal

      J. Manuf. Process., 59 (2020), pp. 343-354

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[39]

      S. Yan, Y. Shi

      Influence of laser power on microstructure and mechanical property of laser-welded Al/Cu dissimilar lap joints

      J. Manuf. Process., 45 (2019), pp. 312-321

      ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar

      Fig. 8 Distribution of solidification properties on the yz cross section at the maximum width of the melt pool.(a) thermal gradient G, (b) solidification velocity vT, (c) cooling rate G×vT, and (d) morphology factor G/vT. These profiles are calculated with a laser power 300 W and velocity 400 mm/s using (a1 through d1) analytical Rosenthal simulation and (a2 through d2) high-fidelity CFD simulation. The laser is moving out of the page from the upper left corner of each color map (Color figure online)

      Quantifying Equiaxed vs Epitaxial Solidification in Laser Melting of CMSX-4 Single Crystal Superalloy

      CMSX -4 단결정 초합금의 레이저 용융에서 등축 응고와 에피택셜 응고 정량화

      본 논문은 독자의 편의를 위해 기계번역된 내용이어서 자세한 내용은 원문을 참고하시기 바랍니다.

      Abstract

      에피택셜 과 등축 응고 사이의 경쟁은 적층 제조에서 실행되는 레이저 용융 동안 CMSX-4 단결정 초합금에서 조사되었습니다. 단일 트랙 레이저 스캔은 레이저 출력과 스캐닝 속도의 여러 조합으로 방향성 응고된 CMSX-4 합금의 분말 없는 표면에서 수행되었습니다. EBSD(Electron Backscattered Diffraction) 매핑은 새로운 방향의 식별을 용이하게 합니다. 영역 분율 및 공간 분포와 함께 융합 영역 내에서 핵을 형성한 “스트레이 그레인”은 충실도가 높은 전산 유체 역학 시뮬레이션을 사용하여 용융 풀 내의 온도 및 유체 속도 필드를 모두 추정했습니다. 이 정보를 핵 생성 모델과 결합하여 용융 풀에서 핵 생성이 발생할 확률이 가장 높은 위치를 결정했습니다. 금속 적층 가공의 일반적인 경험에 따라 레이저 용융 트랙의 응고된 미세 구조는 에피택셜 입자 성장에 의해 지배됩니다. 더 높은 레이저 스캐닝 속도와 더 낮은 출력이 일반적으로 흩어진 입자 감소에 도움이 되지만,그럼에도 불구하고 길쭉한 용융 풀에서 흩어진 입자가 분명했습니다.

      The competition between epitaxial vs. equiaxed solidification has been investigated in CMSX-4 single crystal superalloy during laser melting as practiced in additive manufacturing. Single-track laser scans were performed on a powder-free surface of directionally solidified CMSX-4 alloy with several combinations of laser power and scanning velocity. Electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) mapping facilitated identification of new orientations, i.e., “stray grains” that nucleated within the fusion zone along with their area fraction and spatial distribution. Using high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics simulations, both the temperature and fluid velocity fields within the melt pool were estimated. This information was combined with a nucleation model to determine locations where nucleation has the highest probability to occur in melt pools. In conformance with general experience in metals additive manufacturing, the as-solidified microstructure of the laser-melted tracks is dominated by epitaxial grain growth; nevertheless, stray grains were evident in elongated melt pools. It was found that, though a higher laser scanning velocity and lower power are generally helpful in the reduction of stray grains, the combination of a stable keyhole and minimal fluid velocity further mitigates stray grains in laser single tracks.

      Introduction

      니켈 기반 초합금은 고온에서 긴 노출 시간 동안 높은 인장 강도, 낮은 산화 및 우수한 크리프 저항성을 포함하는 우수한 특성의 고유한 조합으로 인해 가스 터빈 엔진 응용 분야에서 광범위하게 사용됩니다. CMSX-4는 특히 장기 크리프 거동과 관련하여 초고강도의 2세대 레늄 함유 니켈 기반 단결정 초합금입니다. 1 , 2 ]입계의 존재가 크리프를 가속화한다는 인식은 가스 터빈 엔진의 고온 단계를 위한 단결정 블레이드를 개발하게 하여 작동 온도를 높이고 효율을 높이는 데 기여했습니다. 이러한 구성 요소는 사용 중 마모될 수 있습니다. 즉, 구성 요소의 무결성을 복원하고 단결정 미세 구조를 유지하는 수리 방법을 개발하기 위한 지속적인 작업이 있었습니다. 3 , 4 , 5 ]

      적층 제조(AM)가 등장하기 전에는 다양한 용접 공정을 통해 단결정 초합금에 대한 수리 시도가 수행되었습니다. 균열 [ 6 , 7 ] 및 흩어진 입자 8 , 9 ] 와 같은 심각한 결함 이 이 수리 중에 자주 발생합니다. 일반적으로 “스트레이 그레인”이라고 하는 응고 중 모재의 방향과 다른 결정학적 방향을 가진 새로운 그레인의 형성은 니켈 기반 단결정 초합금의 수리 중 유해한 영향으로 인해 중요한 관심 대상입니다. 3 , 10 ]결과적으로 재료의 단결정 구조가 손실되고 원래 구성 요소에 비해 기계적 특성이 손상됩니다. 이러한 흩어진 입자는 특정 조건에서 에피택셜 성장을 대체하는 등축 응고의 시작에 해당합니다.

      떠돌이 결정립 형성을 완화하기 위해 이전 작업은 용융 영역(FZ) 내에서 응고하는 동안 떠돌이 결정립 형성에 영향을 미치는 수지상 응고 거동 및 처리 조건을 이해하는 데 중점을 두었습니다. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] 연구원들은 단결정 합금의 용접 중에 표류 결정립 형성에 대한 몇 가지 가능한 메커니즘을 제안했습니다. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]응고 전단에 앞서 국부적인 구성 과냉각은 이질적인 핵 생성 및 등축 결정립의 성장을 유발할 수 있습니다. 또한 용융 풀에서 활발한 유체 흐름으로 인해 발생하는 덴드라이트 조각화는 용융 풀 경계 근처에서 새로운 결정립을 형성할 수도 있습니다. 두 메커니즘 모두에서, 표류 결정립 형성은 핵 생성 위치에 의존하며, 차이점은 수상 돌기 조각화는 수상 돌기 조각이 핵 생성 위치로 작용한다는 것을 의미하는 반면 다른 메커니즘은 재료,  를 들어 산화물 입자에서 발견되는 다른 유형의 핵 생성 위치를 사용한다는 것을 의미합니다. 잘 알려진 바와 같이, 많은 주물에 대한 반대 접근법은 TiB와 같은 핵제의 도입을 통해 등축 응고를 촉진하는 것입니다.22알루미늄 합금에서.

      헌법적 과냉 메커니즘에서 Hunt 11 ] 는 정상 상태 조건에서 기둥에서 등축으로의 전이(CET)를 설명하는 모델을 개발했습니다. Gaumann과 Kurz는 Hunt의 모델을 수정하여 단결정이 응고되는 동안 떠돌이 결정립이 핵을 생성하고 성장할 수 있는 정도를 설명했습니다. 12 , 14 ] 이후 연구에서 Vitek은 Gaumann의 모델을 개선하고 출력 및 스캐닝 속도와 같은 용접 조건의 영향에 대한 보다 자세한 분석을 포함했습니다. Vitek은 또한 실험 및 모델링 기술을 통해 표류 입자 형성에 대한 기판 방향의 영향을 포함했습니다. 3 , 10 ]일반적으로 높은 용접 속도와 낮은 출력은 표류 입자의 양을 최소화하고 레이저 용접 공정 중 에피택셜 단결정 성장을 최대화하는 것으로 나타났습니다. 3,10 ] 그러나 Vitek은 덴드라이트 조각화를 고려하지 않았으며 그의 연구는 불균질 핵형성이 레이저 용접된 CMSX -4 단결정 합금에서 표류 결정립 형성을 이끄는 주요 메커니즘임을 나타냅니다. 현재 작업에서 Vitek의 수치적 방법이 채택되고 금속 AM의 급속한 특성의 더 높은 속도와 더 낮은 전력 특성으로 확장됩니다.

      AM을 통한 금속 부품 제조 는 지난 10년 동안 급격한 인기 증가를 목격했습니다. 16 ] EBM(Electron Beam Melting)에 의한 CMSX-4의 제작 가능성은 자주 조사되었으나 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] CMSX의 제조 및 수리에 대한 조사는 매우 제한적이었다. – 4개의 단결정 구성요소는 레이저 분말 베드 융합(LPBF)을 사용하며, AM의 인기 있는 하위 집합으로, 특히 표류 입자 형성을 완화하는 메커니즘과 관련이 있습니다. 22 ]이러한 조사 부족은 주로 이러한 합금 시스템과 관련된 처리 문제로 인해 발생합니다. 2 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] 공정 매개변수( 예: 열원 전력, 스캐닝 속도, 스폿 크기, 예열 온도 및 스캔 전략)의 엄격한 제어는 완전히 조밀한 부품을 만들고 유지 관리할 수 있도록 하는 데 필수적입니다. 단결정 미세구조. 25 ] EBM을 사용하여 단결정 합금의 균열 없는 수리가 현재 가능하지만 19 , 24 ] 표류 입자를 생성하지 않는 수리는 쉽게 달성할 수 없습니다.23 , 26 ]

      이 작업에서 LPBF를 대표하는 조건으로 레이저 용융을 사용하여 단결정 CMSX-4에서 표류 입자 완화를 조사했습니다. LPBF는 스캐닝 레이저 빔을 사용하여 금속 분말의 얇은 층을 기판에 녹이고 융합합니다. 층별 증착에서 레이저 빔의 사용은 급격한 온도 구배, 빠른 가열/냉각 주기 및 격렬한 유체 흐름을 경험하는 용융 풀을 생성 합니다 이것은 일반적으로 부품에 결함을 일으킬 수 있는 매우 동적인 물리적 현상으로 이어집니다. 28 , 29 , 30 ] 레이저 유도 키홀의 동역학( 예:, 기화 유발 반동 압력으로 인한 위상 함몰) 및 열유체 흐름은 AM 공정에서 응고 결함과 강하게 결합되고 관련됩니다. 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] 기하 구조의 급격한 변화가 발생하기 쉬운 불안정한 키홀은 다공성, 볼링, 스패터 형성 및 흔하지 않은 미세 구조 상을 포함하는 유해한 물리적 결함을 유발할 수 있습니다. 그러나 키홀 진화와 유체 흐름은 자연적으로 다음을 통해 포착 하기 어렵 습니다 .전통적인 사후 특성화 기술. 고충실도 수치 모델링을 활용하기 위해 이 연구에서는 전산유체역학(CFD)을 적용하여 표면 아래의 레이저-물질 상호 작용을 명확히 했습니다. 36 ] 이것은 응고된 용융물 풀의 단면에 대한 오랫동안 확립된 사후 특성화와 비교하여 키홀 및 용융물 풀 유체 흐름 정량화를 실행합니다.

      CMSX-4 구성 요소의 레이저 기반 AM 수리 및 제조를 위한 적절한 절차를 개발하기 위해 적절한 공정 창을 설정하고 응고 중 표류 입자 형성 경향에 대한 예측 기능을 개발하는 것부터 시작합니다. 다중 합금에 대한 단일 트랙 증착은 분말 층이 있거나 없는 AM 공정에서 용융 풀 형상 및 미세 구조의 정확한 분석을 제공하는 것으로 나타났습니다. 37 , 38 , 39 ]따라서 본 연구에서는 CMSX-4의 응고 거동을 알아보기 위해 분말을 사용하지 않는 단일 트랙 레이저 스캔 실험을 사용하였다. 이는 CMSX-4 단결정의 LPBF 제조를 위한 예비 실험 지침을 제공합니다. 또한 응고 모델링은 기존 용접에서 LPBF와 관련된 급속 용접으로 확장되어 표류 입자 감소를 위한 최적의 레이저 용융 조건을 식별했습니다. 가공 매개변수 최적화를 위한 추가 지침을 제공하기 위해 용융물 풀의 매우 동적인 유체 흐름을 모델링했습니다.

      재료 및 방법

      단일 트랙 실험

      방전 가공(EDM)을 사용하여 CMSX-4 방향성 응고 단결정 잉곳으로부터 샘플을 제작했습니다. 샘플의 최종 기하학은 치수 20의 직육면체 형태였습니다.××20××6mm. 6개 중 하나⟨ 001 ⟩⟨001⟩잉곳의 결정학적 방향은 레이저 트랙이 이 바람직한 성장 방향을 따라 스캔되도록 절단 표면에 수직으로 위치했습니다. 단일 레이저 용융 트랙은 EOS M290 기계를 사용하여 분말이 없는 샘플 표면에 만들어졌습니다. 이 기계는 최대 출력 400W, 가우시안 빔 직경 100의 이터븀 파이버 레이저가 장착된 LPBF 시스템입니다. μμ초점에서 m. 실험 중에 직사각형 샘플을 LPBF 기계용 맞춤형 샘플 홀더의 포켓에 끼워 표면을 동일한 높이로 유지했습니다. 이 맞춤형 샘플 홀더에 대한 자세한 내용은 다른 곳에서 설명합니다. 실험 은 아르곤 퍼지 분위기에서 수행되었으며 예열은 적용되지 않았습니다 단일 트랙 레이저 용융 실험은 다양한 레이저 출력(200~370W)과 스캔 속도(0.4~1.4m/s)에서 수행되었습니다.

      성격 묘사

      레이저 스캐닝 후, 레이저 빔 스캐닝 방향에 수직인 평면에서 FZ를 통해 다이아몬드 톱을 사용하여 샘플을 절단했습니다. 그 후, 샘플을 장착하고 220 그릿 SiC 페이퍼로 시작하여 콜로이드 실리카 현탁액 광택제로 마무리하여 자동 연마했습니다. 결정학적 특성화는 20kV의 가속 전압에서 TESCAN MIRA 3XMH 전계 방출 주사 전자 현미경(SEM)에서 수행되었습니다. EBSD 지도는0.4μm _0.4μ미디엄단계 크기. Bruker 시스템을 사용하여 EBSD 데이터를 정리하고 분석했습니다. EBSD 클린업은 그레인을 접촉시키기 위한 그레인 확장 루틴으로 시작한 다음 인덱스되지 않은 회절 패턴과 관련된 검은색 픽셀을 해결하기 위해 이웃 방향 클린업 루틴으로 이어졌습니다. 용융 풀 형태를 분석하기 위해 단면을 광학 현미경으로 분석했습니다. 광학 특성화의 대비를 향상시키기 위해 10g CuSO로 구성된 Marbles 시약의 변형으로 샘플을 에칭했습니다.44, 50mL HCl 및 70mL H22영형.

      응고 모델링

      구조적 과냉 기준에 기반한 응고 모델링을 수행하여 표유 입자의 성향 및 분포에 대한 가공 매개변수의 영향을 평가했습니다. 이 분석 모델링 접근 방식에 대한 자세한 내용은 이전 작업에서 제공됩니다. 3 , 10 ] 참고문헌 3 에 기술된 바와 같이 , 기본 재료의 결정학적 배향을 가진 용융 풀에서 총 표유 입자 면적 분율의 변화는 최소이므로 기본 재료 배향의 영향은 이 작업에서 고려되지 않았습니다. 우리의 LPBF 결과를 이전 작업과 비교하기 위해 Vitek의 작업에서 사용된 수학적으로 간단한 Rosenthal 방정식 3 ]또한 레이저 매개변수의 함수로 용융 풀의 모양과 FZ의 열 조건을 계산하기 위한 기준으로 여기에서 채택되었습니다. Rosenthal 솔루션은 열이 일정한 재료 특성을 가진 반무한 판의 정상 상태 점원을 통해서만 전도를 통해 전달된다고 가정하며 일반적으로 다음과 같이 표현 됩니다 40 , 41 ] .

      티=티0+η피2 파이케이엑스2+와이2+지2———-√경험치[- 브이(엑스2+와이2+지2———-√− 엑스 )2α _] ,티=티0+η피2파이케이엑스2+와이2+지2경험치⁡[-V(엑스2+와이2+지2-엑스)2α],(1)

      여기서 T 는 온도,티0티0본 연구에서 313K(  , EOS 기계 챔버 온도)로 설정된 주변 온도, P 는 레이저 빔 파워, V 는 레이저 빔 스캐닝 속도,ηη는 레이저 흡수율, k 는 열전도율,αα베이스 합금의 열확산율입니다. x , y , z 는 각각 레이저 스캐닝 방향, 가로 방향 및 세로 방향의 반대 방향과 정렬된 방향입니다 . 이 직교 좌표는 참조 3 의 그림 1에 있는 시스템을 따랐습니다 . CMSX-4에 대한 고상선 온도(1603K)와 액상선 온도(1669K)의 등온선 평균으로 응고 프런트( 즉 , 고체-액체 계면)를 정의했습니다. 42 , 43 , 44 ] 시뮬레이션에 사용된 열물리적 특성은 표 I 에 나열되어 있습니다.표 I CMSX-4의 응고 모델링에 사용된 열물리적 특성

      풀 사이즈 테이블

      열 구배는 외부 열 흐름에 의해 결정되었습니다.∇ 티∇티45 ] 에 의해 주어진 바와 같이 :

      지 = | ∇ 티| =∣∣∣∂티∂엑스나^^+∂티∂와이제이^^+∂티∂지케이^^∣∣∣=(∂티∂엑스)2+(∂티∂와이)2+(∂티∂지)2————————√,G=|∇티|=|∂티∂엑스나^^+∂티∂와이제이^^+∂티∂지케이^^|=(∂티∂엑스)2+(∂티∂와이)2+(∂티∂지)2,(2)

      어디나^^나^^,제이^^제이^^, 그리고케이^^케이^^는 각각 x , y 및 z 방향 을 따른 단위 벡터 입니다. 응고 등온선 속도,V티V티는 다음 관계에 의해 레이저 빔 스캐닝 속도 V 와 기하학적으로 관련됩니다.

      V티= V코사인θ =V∂티∂엑스(∂티∂엑스)2+(∂티∂와이)2+(∂티∂지)2——————-√,V티=V코사인⁡θ=V∂티∂엑스(∂티∂엑스)2+(∂티∂와이)2+(∂티∂지)2,(삼)

      어디θθ는 스캔 방향과 응고 전면의 법선 방향(  , 최대 열 흐름 방향) 사이의 각도입니다. 이 연구의 용접 조건과 같은 제한된 성장에서 수지상 응고 전면은 고체-액체 등온선의 속도로 성장하도록 강제됩니다.V티V티. 46 ]

      응고 전선이 진행되기 전에 새로 핵 생성된 입자의 국지적 비율ΦΦ, 액체 온도 구배 G 에 의해 결정 , 응고 선단 속도V티V티및 핵 밀도N0N0. 고정된 임계 과냉각에서 모든 입자가 핵형성된다고 가정함으로써△티N△티N, 등축 결정립의 반경은 결정립이 핵 생성을 시작하는 시점부터 주상 전선이 결정립에 도달하는 시간까지의 성장 속도를 통합하여 얻습니다. 과냉각으로 대체 시간d (ΔT_) / dt = – _V티G디(△티)/디티=-V티G, 열 구배 G 사이의 다음 관계 , 등축 입자의 국부적 부피 분율ΦΦ, 수상 돌기 팁 과냉각ΔT _△티, 핵 밀도N0N0, 재료 매개변수 n 및 핵생성 과냉각△티N△티N, Gäumann 외 여러분 에 의해 파생되었습니다 . 12 , 14 ] Hunt의 모델 11 ] 의 수정에 기반함 :

      지 =1엔 + 1- 4π _N03 인치( 1 − Φ )———√삼ΔT _( 1 -△티엔 + 1N△티엔 + 1) .G=1N+1-4파이N0삼인⁡(1-Φ)삼△티(1-△티NN+1△티N+1).(4)

      계산을 단순화하기 위해 덴드라이트 팁 과냉각을 전적으로 구성 과냉각의 것으로 추정합니다.△티씨△티씨, 멱법칙 형식으로 근사화할 수 있습니다.△티씨= ( _V티)1 / 엔△티씨=(ㅏV티)1/N, 여기서 a 와 n 은 재료 종속 상수입니다. CMSX-4의 경우 이 값은a = 1.25 ×106ㅏ=1.25×106 s K 3.4m− 1-1,엔 = 3.4N=3.4, 그리고N0= 2 ×1015N0=2×1015미디엄− 3,-삼,참고문헌 3 에 의해 보고된 바와 같이 .△티N△티N2.5K이며 보다 큰 냉각 속도에서 응고에 대해 무시할 수 있습니다.106106 K/s. 에 대한 표현ΦΦ위의 방정식을 재배열하여 해결됩니다.

      Φ= 1 -이자형에스\ 여기서\  S=- 4π _N0삼(1( 엔 + 1 ) (GN/ 아V티)1 / 엔)삼=−2.356×1019(vTG3.4)33.4.Φ=1−eS\ where\ S=−4πN03(1(n+1)(Gn/avT)1/n)3=−2.356×1019(vTG3.4)33.4.

      (5)

      As proposed by Hunt,[11] a value of Φ≤0.66Φ≤0.66 pct represents fully columnar epitaxial growth condition, and, conversely, a value of Φ≥49Φ≥49 pct indicates that the initial single crystal microstructure is fully replaced by an equiaxed microstructure. To calculate the overall stray grain area fraction, we followed Vitek’s method by dividing the FZ into roughly 19 to 28 discrete parts (depending on the length of the melt pool) of equal length from the point of maximum width to the end of melt pool along the x direction. The values of G and vTvT were determined at the center on the melt pool boundary of each section and these values were used to represent the entire section. The area-weighted average of ΦΦ over these discrete sections along the length of melt pool is designated as Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯, and is given by:

      Φ¯¯¯¯=∑kAkΦk∑kAk,Φ¯=∑kAkΦk∑kAk,

      (6)

      where k is the index for each subsection, and AkAk and ΦkΦk are the areas and ΦΦ values for each subsection. The summation is taken over all the sections along the melt pool. Vitek’s improved model allows the calculation of stray grain area fraction by considering the melt pool geometry and variations of G and vTvT around the tail end of the pool.

      수년에 걸쳐 용융 풀 현상 모델링의 정확도를 개선하기 위해 많은 고급 수치 방법이 개발되었습니다. 우리는 FLOW-3D와 함께 고충실도 CFD를 사용했습니다. FLOW-3D는 여러 물리 모델을 통합하는 상용 FVM(Finite Volume Method)입니다. 47 , 48 ] CFD는 유체 운동과 열 전달을 수치적으로 시뮬레이션하며 여기서 사용된 기본 물리 모델은 레이저 및 표면력 모델이었습니다. 레이저 모델에서는 레이 트레이싱 기법을 통해 다중 반사와 프레넬 흡수를 구현합니다. 36 ]먼저, 레이저 빔은 레이저 빔에 의해 조명되는 각 그리드 셀을 기준으로 여러 개의 광선으로 이산화됩니다. 그런 다음 각 입사 광선에 대해 입사 벡터가 입사 위치에서 금속 표면의 법선 벡터와 정렬될 때 에너지의 일부가 금속에 의해 흡수됩니다. 흡수율은 Fresnel 방정식을 사용하여 추정됩니다. 나머지 에너지는 반사광선 에 의해 유지되며 , 반사광선은 재료 표면에 부딪히면 새로운 입사광선으로 처리됩니다. 두 가지 주요 힘이 액체 금속 표면에 작용하여 자유 표면을 변형시킵니다. 금속의 증발에 의해 생성된 반동 압력은 증기 억제를 일으키는 주요 힘입니다. 본 연구에서 사용된 반동 압력 모델은피아르 자형= 특급 _{ B ( 1- _티V/ 티) }피아르 자형=ㅏ경험치⁡{비(1-티V/티)}, 어디피아르 자형피아르 자형는 반동압력, A 와 B 는 재료의 물성에 관련된 계수로 각각 75와 15이다.티V티V는 포화 온도이고 T 는 키홀 벽의 온도입니다. 표면 흐름 및 키홀 형성의 다른 원동력은 표면 장력입니다. 표면 장력 계수는 Marangoni 흐름을 포함하기 위해 온도의 선형 함수로 추정되며,σ =1.79-9.90⋅10− 4( 티− 1654케이 )σ=1.79-9.90⋅10-4(티-1654년케이)엔엠− 1-1. 49 ] 계산 영역은 베어 플레이트의 절반입니다(2300 μμ미디엄××250 μμ미디엄××500 μμm) xz 평면 에 적용된 대칭 경계 조건 . 메쉬 크기는 8입니다. μμm이고 시간 단계는 0.15입니다. μμs는 계산 효율성과 정확성 간의 균형을 제공합니다.

      결과 및 논의

      용융 풀 형태

      이 작업에 사용된 5개의 레이저 파워( P )와 6개의 스캐닝 속도( V )는 서로 다른 29개의 용융 풀을 생성했습니다.피- 브이피-V조합. P 와 V 값이 가장 높은 것은 그림 1 을 기준으로 과도한 볼링과 관련이 있기 때문에 본 연구에서는 분석하지 않았다  .

      단일 트랙 용융 풀은 그림  1 과 같이 형상에 따라 네 가지 유형으로 분류할 수 있습니다 39 ] : (1) 전도 모드(파란색 상자), (2) 키홀 모드(빨간색), (3) 전환 모드(마젠타), (4) 볼링 모드(녹색). 높은 레이저 출력과 낮은 스캐닝 속도의 일반적인 조합인 키홀 모드에서 용융물 풀은 일반적으로 너비/깊이( W / D ) 비율이 0.5보다 훨씬 큰 깊고 가느다란 모양을 나타냅니다 . 스캐닝 속도가 증가함에 따라 용융 풀이 얕아져 W / D 가 약 0.5인 반원형 전도 모드 용융 풀을 나타냅니다. W / D _전환 모드 용융 풀의 경우 1에서 0.5 사이입니다. 스캐닝 속도를 1200 및 1400mm/s로 더 높이면 충분히 큰 캡 높이와 볼링 모드 용융 풀의 특징인 과도한 언더컷이 발생할 수 있습니다.

      힘과 속도의 함수로서의 용융 풀 깊이와 너비는 각각 그림  2 (a)와 (b)에 표시되어 있습니다. 용융 풀 폭은 기판 표면에서 측정되었습니다. 그림  2 (a)는 깊이가 레이저 출력과 매우 선형적인 관계를 따른다는 것을 보여줍니다. 속도가 증가함에 따라 깊이  파워 곡선의 기울기는 꾸준히 감소하지만 더 높은 속도 곡선에는 약간의 겹침이 있습니다. 이러한 예상치 못한 중첩은 종종 용융 풀 형태의 동적 변화를 유발하는 유체 흐름의 영향과 레이저 스캔당 하나의 이미지만 추출되었다는 사실 때문일 수 있습니다. 이러한 선형 동작은 그림 2 (b) 의 너비에 대해 명확하지 않습니다  . 그림  2(c)는 선형 에너지 밀도 P / V 의 함수로서 용융 깊이와 폭을 보여줍니다 . 선형 에너지 밀도는 퇴적물의 단위 길이당 에너지 투입량을 측정한 것입니다. 50 ] 용융 풀 깊이는 에너지 밀도에 따라 달라지며 너비는 더 많은 분산을 나타냅니다. 동일한 에너지 밀도가 준공 부품의 용융 풀, 미세 구조 또는 속성에서 반드시 동일한 유체 역학을 초래하지는 않는다는 점에 유의하는 것이 중요합니다. 50 ]

      그림 1
      그림 1
      그림 2
      그림 2

      레이저 흡수율 평가

      레이저 흡수율은 LPBF 조건에서 재료 및 가공 매개변수에 따라 크게 달라진다는 것은 잘 알려져 있습니다. 31 , 51 , 52 ] 적분구를 이용한 전통적인 흡수율의 직접 측정은 일반적으로 높은 비용과 구현의 어려움으로 인해 쉽게 접근할 수 없습니다. 51 ] 그  . 39 ] 전도 모드 용융 풀에 대한 Rosenthal 방정식을 기반으로 경험적 레이저 흡수율 모델을 개발했지만 기본 가정으로 인해 키홀 용융 풀에 대한 정확한 예측을 제공하지 못했습니다. 40 ] 최근 간 . 53 ] Ti–6Al–4V에 대한 30개의 고충실도 다중 물리 시뮬레이션 사례를 사용하여 레이저 흡수에 대한 스케일링 법칙을 확인했습니다. 그러나 연구 중인 특정 재료에 대한 최소 흡수(평평한 용융 표면의 흡수율)에 대한 지식이 필요하며 이는 CMSX-4에 대해 알려지지 않았습니다. 다양한 키홀 모양의 용융 풀에 대한 레이저 흡수의 정확한 추정치를 얻기가 어렵기 때문에 상한 및 하한 흡수율로 분석 시뮬레이션을 실행하기로 결정했습니다. 깊은 키홀 모양의 용융 풀의 경우 대부분의 빛을 가두는 키홀 내 다중 반사로 인해 레이저 흡수율이 0.8만큼 높을 수 있습니다. 이것은 기하학적 현상이며 기본 재료에 민감하지 않습니다. 5152 , 54 ] 따라서 본 연구에서는 흡수율의 상한을 0.8로 설정하였다. 참고 문헌 51 에 나타낸 바와 같이 , 전도 용융 풀에 해당하는 최저 흡수율은 약 0.3이었으며, 이는 이 연구에서 합리적인 하한 값입니다. 따라서 레이저 흡수율이 스트레이 그레인 형성에 미치는 영향을 보여주기 위해 흡수율 값을 0.55 ± 0.25로 설정했습니다. Vitek의 작업에서는 1.0의 고정 흡수율 값이 사용되었습니다. 3 ]

      퓨전 존 미세구조

      그림  3 은 200~300W 및 600~300W 및 600~300W 범위의 레이저 출력 및 속도로 9가지 다른 처리 매개변수에 의해 생성된 CMSX-4 레이저 트랙의 yz 단면 에서 취한 EBSD 역극점도와 해당 역극점도를 보여 줍니다. 각각 1400mm/s. EBSD 맵에서 여러 기능을 쉽게 관찰할 수 있습니다. 스트레이 그레인은 EBSD 맵에서 그 방향에 해당하는 다른 RGB 색상으로 나타나고 그레인 경계를 묘사하기 위해 5도의 잘못된 방향이 사용되었습니다. 여기, 그림  3 에서 스트레이 그레인은 대부분 용융 풀의 상단 중심선에 집중되어 있으며, 이는 용접된 단결정 CMSX-4의 이전 보고서와 일치합니다. 10 ]역 극점도에서, 점 근처에 집중된 클러스터⟨ 001 ⟩⟨001⟩융합 경계에서 유사한 방향을 유지하는 단결정 기반 및 에피택셜로 응고된 덴드라이트를 나타냅니다. 그러나 흩어진 곡물은 식별할 수 있는 질감이 없는 흩어져 있는 점으로 나타납니다. 단결정 기본 재료의 결정학적 방향은 주로⟨ 001 ⟩⟨001⟩비록 샘플을 절단하는 동안 식별할 수 없는 기울기 각도로 인해 또는 단결정 성장 과정에서 약간의 잘못된 방향이 있었기 때문에 약간의 편차가 있지만. 용융 풀 내부의 응고된 수상 돌기의 기본 방향은 다시 한 번⟨ 001 ⟩⟨001⟩주상 결정립 구조와 유사한 에피택셜 성장의 결과. 그림 3 과 같이 용융 풀에서 수상돌기의 성장 방향은 하단의 수직 방향에서 상단의 수평 방향으로 변경되었습니다  . 이 전이는 주로 온도 구배 방향의 변화로 인한 것입니다. 두 번째 전환은 CET입니다. FZ의 상단 중심선 주변에서 다양한 방향의 흩어진 입자가 관찰되며, 여기서 안쪽으로 성장하는 수상돌기가 서로 충돌하여 용융 풀에서 응고되는 마지막 위치가 됩니다.

      더 깊은 키홀 모양을 특징으로 하는 샘플에서 용융 풀의 경계 근처에 침전된 흩어진 입자가 분명합니다. 이러한 새로운 입자는 나중에 모델링 섹션에서 논의되는 수상돌기 조각화 메커니즘에 의해 잠재적으로 발생합니다. 결정립이 강한 열 구배에서 핵을 생성하고 성장한 결과, 대부분의 흩어진 결정립은 모든 방향에서 동일한 크기를 갖기보다는 장축이 열 구배 방향과 정렬된 길쭉한 모양을 갖습니다. 그림 3 의 전도 모드 용융 풀 흩어진 입자가 없는 것으로 입증되는 더 나은 단결정 품질을 나타냅니다. 상대적으로 낮은 출력과 높은 속도의 스캐닝 레이저에 의해 생성된 이러한 더 얕은 용융 풀에서 최소한의 결정립 핵형성이 발생한다는 것은 명백합니다. 더 큰 면적 분율을 가진 스트레이 그레인은 고출력 및 저속으로 생성된 깊은 용융 풀에서 더 자주 관찰됩니다. 국부 응고 조건에 대한 동력 및 속도의 영향은 후속 모델링 섹션에서 조사할 것입니다.

      그림 3
      그림 3

      응고 모델링

      서론에서 언급한 바와 같이 연구자들은 단결정 용접 중에 표류 결정립 형성의 가능한 메커니즘을 평가했습니다. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 55 ]논의된 가장 인기 있는 두 가지 메커니즘은 (1) 응고 전단에 앞서 구성적 과냉각에 의해 도움을 받는 이종 핵형성 및 (2) 용융물 풀의 유체 흐름으로 인한 덴드라이트 조각화입니다. 첫 번째 메커니즘은 광범위하게 연구되었습니다. 이원 합금을 예로 들면, 고체는 액체만큼 많은 용질을 수용할 수 없으므로 응고 중에 용질을 액체로 거부합니다. 결과적으로, 성장하는 수상돌기 앞에서 용질 분할은 실제 온도가 국부 평형 액상선보다 낮은 과냉각 액체를 생성합니다. 충분히 광범위한 체질적으로 과냉각된 구역의 존재는 새로운 결정립의 핵형성 및 성장을 촉진합니다. 56 ]전체 과냉각은 응고 전면에서의 구성, 동역학 및 곡률 과냉각을 포함한 여러 기여의 합입니다. 일반적인 가정은 동역학 및 곡률 과냉각이 합금에 대한 용질 과냉각의 더 큰 기여와 관련하여 무시될 수 있다는 것입니다. 57 ]

      서로 다른 기본 메커니즘을 더 잘 이해하려면피- 브이피-V조건에서 응고 모델링이 수행됩니다. 첫 번째 목적은 스트레이 그레인의 전체 범위를 평가하는 것입니다(Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯) 처리 매개 변수의 함수로 국부적 표류 입자 비율의 변화를 조사하기 위해 (ΦΦ) 용융 풀의 위치 함수로. 두 번째 목적은 금속 AM의 빠른 응고 동안 응고 미세 구조와 표류 입자 형성 메커니즘 사이의 관계를 이해하는 것입니다.

      그림 4
      그림 4

      그림  4 는 해석적으로 시뮬레이션된 표류 입자 비율을 보여줍니다.Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯세 가지 레이저 흡수율 값에서 다양한 레이저 스캐닝 속도 및 레이저 출력에 대해. 결과는 스트레이 그레인 면적 비율이 흡수된 에너지에 민감하다는 것을 보여줍니다. 흡수율을 0.30에서 0.80으로 증가시키면Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯약 3배이며, 이 효과는 저속 및 고출력 영역에서 더욱 두드러집니다. 다른 모든 조건이 같다면, 흡수된 전력의 큰 영향은 평균 열 구배 크기의 일반적인 감소와 용융 풀 내 평균 응고율의 증가에 기인합니다. 스캐닝 속도가 증가하고 전력이 감소함에 따라 평균 스트레이 그레인 비율이 감소합니다. 이러한 일반적인 경향은 Vitek의 작업에서 채택된 그림 5 의 파란색 영역에서 시뮬레이션된 용접 결과와 일치합니다  . 3 ] 더 큰 과냉각 구역( 즉, 지 /V티G/V티영역)은 용접 풀의 표유 입자의 면적 비율이 분홍색 영역에 해당하는 LPBF 조건의 면적 비율보다 훨씬 더 크다는 것을 의미합니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 두 데이터 세트의 일반적인 경향은 유사합니다.  , 레이저 출력이 감소하고 레이저 속도가 증가함에 따라 표류 입자의 비율이 감소합니다. 또한 그림  5 에서 스캐닝 속도가 LPBF 영역으로 증가함에 따라 표유 입자 면적 분율에 대한 레이저 매개변수의 변화 효과가 감소한다는 것을 추론할 수 있습니다. 그림  6 (a)는 그림 3 의 EBSD 분석에서 나온 실험적 표류 결정립 면적 분율  과 그림 4 의 해석 시뮬레이션 결과를  비교합니다.. 열쇠 구멍 모양의 FZ에서 정확한 값이 다르지만 추세는 시뮬레이션과 실험 데이터 모두에서 일관되었습니다. 키홀 모양의 용융 풀, 특히 전력이 300W인 2개는 분석 시뮬레이션 예측보다 훨씬 더 많은 양의 흩어진 입자를 가지고 있습니다. Rosenthal 방정식은 일반적으로 열 전달이 순전히 전도에 의해 좌우된다는 가정으로 인해 열쇠 구멍 체제의 열 흐름을 적절하게 반영하지 못하기 때문에 이러한 불일치가 실제로 예상됩니다. 39 , 40 ] 그것은 또한 그림  4 의 발견 , 즉 키홀 모드 동안 흡수된 전력의 증가가 표류 입자 형성에 더 이상적인 조건을 초래한다는 것을 검증합니다. 그림  6 (b)는 실험을 비교Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯수치 CFD 시뮬레이션Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯. CFD 모델이 약간 초과 예측하지만Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯전체적으로피- 브이피-V조건에서 열쇠 구멍 조건에서의 예측은 분석 모델보다 정확합니다. 전도 모드 용융 풀의 경우 실험 값이 분석 시뮬레이션 값과 더 가깝게 정렬됩니다.

      그림 5
      그림 5

      모의 온도 구배 G 분포 및 응고율 검사V티V티분석 모델링의 쌍은 그림  7 (a)의 CMSX-4 미세 구조 선택 맵에 표시됩니다. 제공지 /V티G/V티(  , 형태 인자)는 형태를 제어하고지 ×V티G×V티(  , 냉각 속도)는 응고된 미세 구조의 규모를 제어하고 , 58 , 59 ]지 -V티G-V티플롯은 전통적인 제조 공정과 AM 공정 모두에서 미세 구조 제어를 지원합니다. 이 플롯의 몇 가지 분명한 특징은 등축, 주상, 평면 전면 및 이러한 경계 근처의 전이 영역을 구분하는 경계입니다. 그림  7 (a)는 몇 가지 선택된 분석 열 시뮬레이션에 대한 미세 구조 선택 맵을 나타내는 반면 그림  7 (b)는 수치 열 모델의 결과와 동일한 맵을 보여줍니다. 등축 미세구조의 형성은 낮은 G 이상 에서 명확하게 선호됩니다.V티V티정황. 이 플롯에서 각 곡선의 평면 전면에 가장 가까운 지점은 용융 풀의 최대 너비 위치에 해당하는 반면 등축 영역에 가까운 지점의 끝은 용융 풀의 후면 꼬리에 해당합니다. 그림  7 (a)에서 대부분의지 -V티G-V티응고 전면의 쌍은 원주형 영역에 속하고 점차 CET 영역으로 위쪽으로 이동하지만 용융 풀의 꼬리는 다음에 따라 완전히 등축 영역에 도달하거나 도달하지 않을 수 있습니다.피- 브이피-V조합. 그림 7 (a) 의 곡선 중 어느 것도  평면 전면 영역을 통과하지 않지만 더 높은 전력의 경우에 가까워집니다. 저속 레이저 용융 공정을 사용하는 이전 작업에서는 곡선이 평면 영역을 통과할 수 있습니다. 레이저 속도가 증가함에 따라 용융 풀 꼬리는 여전히 CET 영역에 있지만 완전히 등축 영역에서 멀어집니다. CET 영역으로 떨어지는 섹션의 수도 감소합니다.Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯응고된 물질에서.

      그림 6
      그림 6

      그만큼지 -V티G-V티CFD 모델을 사용하여 시뮬레이션된 응고 전면의 쌍이 그림  7 (b)에 나와 있습니다. 세 방향 모두에서 각 점 사이의 일정한 간격으로 미리 정의된 좌표에서 수행된 해석 시뮬레이션과 달리, 고충실도 CFD 모델의 출력은 불규칙한 사면체 좌표계에 있었고 G 를 추출하기 전에 일반 3D 그리드에 선형 보간되었습니다. 그리고V티V티그런 다음 미세 구조 선택 맵에 플롯됩니다. 일반적인 경향은 그림  7 (a)의 것과 일치하지만 이 방법으로 모델링된 매우 동적인 유체 흐름으로 인해 결과에 더 많은 분산이 있었습니다. 그만큼지 -V티G-V티분석 열 모델의 쌍 경로는 더 연속적인 반면 수치 시뮬레이션의 경로는 용융 풀 꼬리 모양의 차이를 나타내는 날카로운 굴곡이 있습니다(이는 G 및V티V티) 두 모델에 의해 시뮬레이션됩니다.

      그림 7
      그림 7
      그림 8
      그림 8

      유체 흐름을 통합한 응고 모델링

      수치 CFD 모델을 사용하여 유동 입자 형성 정도에 대한 유체 흐름의 영향을 이해하고 시뮬레이션 결과를 분석 Rosenthal 솔루션과 비교했습니다. 그림  8 은 응고 매개변수 G 의 분포를 보여줍니다.V티V티,지 /V티G/V티, 그리고지 ×V티G×V티yz 단면에서 x  FLOW-3D에서 (a1–d1) 분석 열 모델링 및 (a2–d2) FVM 방법을 사용하여 시뮬레이션된 용융 풀의 최대 폭입니다. 그림  8 의 값은 응고 전선이 특정 위치에 도달할 때 정확한 값일 수도 있고 아닐 수도 있지만 일반적인 추세를 반영한다는 의미의 임시 가상 값입니다. 이 프로파일은 출력 300W 및 속도 400mm/s의 레이저 빔에서 시뮬레이션됩니다. 용융 풀 경계는 흰색 곡선으로 표시됩니다. (a2–d2)의 CFD 시뮬레이션 용융 풀 깊이는 342입니다. μμm, 측정 깊이 352와 잘 일치 μμ일치하는 길쭉한 열쇠 구멍 모양과 함께 그림 1 에 표시된 실험 FZ의 m  . 그러나 분석 모델은 반원 모양의 용융 풀을 출력하고 용융 풀 깊이는 264에 불과합니다. μμ열쇠 구멍의 경우 현실과는 거리가 멀다. CFD 시뮬레이션 결과에서 열 구배는 레이저 반사 증가와 불안정한 액체-증기 상호 작용이 발생하는 증기 함몰의 동적 부분 근처에 있기 때문에 FZ 하단에서 더 높습니다. 대조적으로 해석 결과의 열 구배 크기는 경계를 따라 균일합니다. 두 시뮬레이션 결과 모두 그림 8 (a1) 및 (a2) 에서 응고가 용융 풀의 상단 중심선을 향해 진행됨에 따라 열 구배가 점차 감소합니다  . 응고율은 그림 8 과 같이 경계 근처에서 거의 0입니다. (b1) 및 (b2). 이는 경계 영역이 응고되기 시작할 때 국부 응고 전면의 법선 방향이 레이저 스캐닝 방향에 수직이기 때문입니다. 이것은 드라이브θ → π/ 2θ→파이/2그리고V티→ 0V티→0식에서 [ 3 ]. 대조적으로 용융 풀의 상단 중심선 근처 영역에서 응고 전면의 법선 방향은 레이저 스캐닝 방향과 잘 정렬되어 있습니다.θ → 0θ→0그리고V티→ 브이V티→V, 빔 스캐닝 속도. G 와 _V티V티값이 얻어지면 냉각 속도지 ×V티G×V티및 형태 인자지 /V티G/V티계산할 수 있습니다. 그림 8 (c2)는 용융 풀 바닥 근처의 온도 구배가 매우 높고 상단에서 더 빠른 성장 속도로  인해 냉각 속도가 용융 풀의 바닥 및 상단 중심선 근처에서 더 높다는 것을 보여줍니다. 지역. 그러나 이러한 추세는 그림  8 (c1)에 캡처되지 않았습니다. 그림 8 의 형태 요인 (d1) 및 (d2)는 중심선에 접근함에 따라 눈에 띄게 감소합니다. 경계에서 큰 값은 열 구배를 거의 0인 성장 속도로 나누기 때문에 발생합니다. 이 높은 형태 인자는 주상 미세구조 형성 가능성이 높음을 시사하는 반면, 중앙 영역의 값이 낮을수록 등축 미세구조의 가능성이 더 크다는 것을 나타냅니다. Tanet al. 또한 키홀 모양의 용접 풀 59 ] 에서 이러한 응고 매개변수의 분포 를 비슷한 일반적인 경향으로 보여주었습니다. 그림  3 에서 볼 수 있듯이 용융 풀의 상단 중심선에 있는 흩어진 입자는 낮은 특징을 나타내는 영역과 일치합니다.지 /V티G/V티그림  8 (d1) 및 (d2)의 값. 시뮬레이션과 실험 간의 이러한 일치는 용융 풀의 상단 중심선에 축적된 흩어진 입자의 핵 생성 및 성장이 등온선 속도의 증가와 온도 구배의 감소에 의해 촉진됨을 보여줍니다.

      그림 9
      그림 9

      그림  9 는 유체 속도 및 국부적 핵형성 성향을 보여줍니다.ΦΦ300W의 일정한 레이저 출력과 400, 800 및 1200mm/s의 세 가지 다른 레이저 속도에 의해 생성된 3D 용융 풀 전체에 걸쳐. 그림  9 (d)~(f)는 로컬ΦΦ해당 3D 보기에서 밝은 회색 평면으로 표시된 특정 yz 단면의 분포. 이 yz 섹션은 가장 높기 때문에 선택되었습니다.Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯용융 풀 내의 값은 각각 23.40, 11.85 및 2.45pct입니다. 이들은 그림  3 의 실험 데이터와 비교하기에 적절하지 않을 수 있는 액체 용융 풀의 과도 값이며Φ¯¯¯¯Φ¯그림  6 의 값은 이 값이 고체-액체 계면에 가깝지 않고 용융 풀의 중간에서 취해졌기 때문입니다. 온도가 훨씬 낮아서 핵이 생존하고 성장할 수 있기 때문에 핵 형성은 용융 풀의 중간이 아닌 고체-액체 계면에 더 가깝게 발생할 가능성이 있습니다.

      그림  3 (a), (d), (g), (h)에서 위쪽 중심선에서 멀리 떨어져 있는 흩어진 결정립이 있었습니다. 그들은 훨씬 더 높은 열 구배와 더 낮은 응고 속도 필드에 위치하기 때문에 과냉각 이론은 이러한 영역에서 표류 입자의 형성에 대한 만족스러운 설명이 아닙니다. 이것은 떠돌이 결정립의 형성을 야기할 수 있는 두 번째 메커니즘,  수상돌기의 팁을 가로지르는 유체 흐름에 의해 유발되는 수상돌기 조각화를 고려하도록 동기를 부여합니다. 유체 흐름이 열 구배를 따라 속도 성분을 갖고 고체-액체 계면 속도보다 클 때, 주상 수상돌기의 국지적 재용융은 용질이 풍부한 액체가 흐물흐물한 구역의 깊은 곳에서 액상선 등온선까지 이동함으로써 발생할 수 있습니다. . 55] 분리된 수상돌기는 대류에 의해 열린 액체로 운반될 수 있습니다. 풀이 과냉각 상태이기 때문에 이러한 파편은 고온 조건에서 충분히 오래 생존하여 길 잃은 입자의 핵 생성 사이트로 작용할 수 있습니다. 결과적으로 수상 돌기 조각화 과정은 활성 핵의 수를 효과적으로 증가시킬 수 있습니다.N0N0) 용융 풀 15 , 60 , 61 ] 에서 생성된 미세 구조에서 표류 입자의 면적을 증가시킵니다.

      그림  9 (a) 및 (b)에서 반동 압력은 용융 유체를 아래쪽으로 흐르게 하여 결과 흐름을 지배합니다. 유체 속도의 역방향 요소는 V = 400 및 800mm/s에 대해 각각 최대값 1.0 및 1.6m/s로 더 느려집니다 . 그림  9 (c)에서 레이저 속도가 더 증가함에 따라 증기 침하가 더 얕고 넓어지고 반동 압력이 더 고르게 분포되어 증기 침강에서 주변 영역으로 유체를 밀어냅니다. 역류는 최대값 3.5m/s로 더 빨라집니다. 용융 풀의 최대 너비에서 yz 단면  의 키홀 아래 평균 유체 속도는 그림에 표시된 경우에 대해 0.46, 0.45 및 1.44m/s입니다.9 (a), (b) 및 (c). 키홀 깊이의 변동은 각 경우의 최대 깊이와 최소 깊이의 차이로 정의되는 크기로 정량화됩니다. 240 범위의 강한 증기 내림 변동 μμm은 그림 9 (a)의 V = 400mm/s 경우에서  발견 되지만 이 변동은 그림  9 (c)에서 16의 범위로  크게 감소합니다.μμ미디엄. V = 400mm/s인 경우 의 유체장과 높은 변동 범위는 이전 키홀 동역학 시뮬레이션과 일치합니다. 34 ]

      따라서 V = 400mm/s 키홀 케이스의 무질서한 변동 흐름이 용융 풀 경계를 따라 응고된 주상 수상돌기에서 분리된 조각을 구동할 가능성이 있습니다. V = 1200mm/s의 경우 강한 역류 는 그림 3 에서 관찰되지 않았지만 동일한 효과를 가질 수 있습니다. . 덴드라이트 조각화에 대한 유체 유동장의 영향에 대한 이 경험적 설명은 용융 풀 경계 근처에 떠돌이 입자의 존재에 대한 그럴듯한 설명을 제공합니다. 분명히 하기 위해, 우리는 이 가설을 검증하기 위해 이 현상에 대한 직접적인 실험적 관찰을 하지 않았습니다. 이 작업에서 표유 입자 면적 분율을 계산할 때 단순화를 위해 핵 생성 모델링에 일정한 핵 생성 수 밀도가 적용되었습니다. 이는 그림  9 의 표류 입자 영역 비율 이 수지상정 조각화가 발생하는 경우 이러한 높은 유체 흐름 용융 풀에서 발생할 수 있는 것,  강화된 핵 생성 밀도를 반영하지 않는다는 것을 의미합니다.

      위의 이유로 핵 형성에 대한 수상 돌기 조각화의 영향을 아직 배제할 수 없습니다. 그러나 단편화 이론은 용접 문헌 [ 62 ] 에서 검증될 만큼 충분히 개발되지 않았 으므로 부차적인 중요성만 고려된다는 점에 유의해야 합니다. 1200mm/s를 초과하는 레이저 스캐닝 속도는 최소한의 표류 결정립 면적 분율을 가지고 있음에도 불구하고 분명한 볼링을 나타내기 때문에 단결정 수리 및 AM 처리에 적합하지 않습니다. 따라서 낮은 P 및 높은 V 에 의해 생성된 응고 전면 근처에서 키홀 변동이 최소화되고 유체 속도가 완만해진 용융 풀이 생성된다는 결론을 내릴 수 있습니다., 처리 창의 극한은 아니지만 흩어진 입자를 나타낼 가능성이 가장 적습니다.

      마지막으로 단일 레이저 트랙의 응고 거동을 조사하면 에피택셜 성장 동안 표류 입자 형성을 더 잘 이해할 수 있다는 점에 주목하는 것이 중요합니다. 우리의 현재 결과는 최적의 레이저 매개변수에 대한 일반적인 지침을 제공하여 최소 스트레이 그레인을 달성하고 단결정 구조를 유지합니다. 이 가이드라인은 250W 정도의 전력과 600~800mm/s의 스캔 속도로 최소 흩어진 입자에 적합한 공정 창을 제공합니다. 각 처리 매개변수를 신중하게 선택하면 과거에 스테인리스강에 대한 거의 단결정 미세 구조를 인쇄하는 데 성공했으며 이는 CMSX-4 AM 빌드에 대한 가능성을 보여줍니다. 63 ]신뢰성을 보장하기 위해 AM 수리 프로세스를 시작하기 전에 보다 엄격한 실험 테스트 및 시뮬레이션이 여전히 필요합니다. 둘 이상의 레이저 트랙 사이의 상호 작용도 고려해야 합니다. 또한 레이저, CMSX-4 분말 및 벌크 재료 간의 상호 작용이 중요하며, 수리 중에 여러 층의 CMSX-4 재료를 축적해야 하는 경우 다른 스캔 전략의 효과도 중요한 역할을 할 수 있습니다. 분말이 포함된 경우 Lopez-Galilea 등 의 연구에서 제안한 바와 같이 분말이 주로 완전히 녹지 않았을 때 추가 핵 생성 사이트를 도입하기 때문에 단순히 레이저 분말과 속도를 조작하여 흩어진 입자 형성을 완화하기 어려울 수 있습니다 . 22 ]결과적으로 CMSX-4 단결정을 수리하기 위한 레이저 AM의 가능성을 다루기 위해서는 기판 재료, 레이저 출력, 속도, 해치 간격 및 층 두께의 조합을 모두 고려해야 하며 향후 연구에서 다루어야 합니다. CFD 모델링은 2개 이상의 레이저 트랙 사이의 상호작용과 열장에 미치는 영향을 통합할 수 있으며, 이는 AM 빌드 시나리오 동안 핵 생성 조건으로 단일 비드 연구의 지식 격차를 해소할 것입니다.

      결론

      LPBF 제조의 특징적인 조건 하에서 CMSX-4 단결정 의 에피택셜(기둥형)  등축 응고 사이의 경쟁을 실험적 및 이론적으로 모두 조사했습니다. 이 연구는 고전적인 응고 개념을 도입하여 빠른 레이저 용융의 미세 구조 특징을 설명하고 응고 조건과 표유 결정 성향을 예측하기 위해 해석적 및 수치적 고충실도 CFD 열 모델 간의 비교를 설명했습니다. 본 연구로부터 다음과 같은 주요 결론을 도출할 수 있다.

      • 단일 레이저 트랙의 레이저 가공 조건은 용융 풀 형상, 레이저 흡수율, 유체 흐름 및 키홀 요동, 입자 구조 및 표류 입자 형성 민감성에 강한 영향을 미치는 것으로 밝혀졌습니다.
      • 레이저 용접을 위해 개발된 이론적인 표유 결정립 핵형성 분석이 레이저 용융 AM 조건으로 확장되었습니다. 분석 모델링 결과와 단일 레이저 트랙의 미세구조 특성화를 비교하면 예측이 전도 및 볼링 조건에서 실험적 관찰과 잘 일치하는 반면 키홀 조건에서는 예측이 약간 과소하다는 것을 알 수 있습니다. 이러한 불일치는 레이저 트랙의 대표성이 없는 섹션이나 유체 속도 필드의 변화로 인해 발생할 수 있습니다. CFD 모델에서 추출한 열장에 동일한 표유 입자 계산 파이프라인을 적용하면 연구된 모든 사례에서 과대평가가 발생하지만 분석 모델보다 연장된 용융 풀의 실험 데이터와 더 정확하게 일치합니다.
      • 이 연구에서 두 가지 표류 결정립 형성 메커니즘인 불균일 핵형성 및 수상돌기 조각화가 평가되었습니다. 우리의 결과는 불균일 핵형성이 용융 풀의 상단 중심선에서 새로운 결정립의 형성으로 이어지는 주요 메커니즘임을 시사합니다.지 /V티G/V티정권.
      • 용융 풀 경계 근처의 흩어진 입자는 깊은 키홀 모양의 용융 풀에서 독점적으로 관찰되며, 이는 강한 유체 흐름으로 인한 수상 돌기 조각화의 영향이 이러한 유형의 용융 풀에서 고려하기에 충분히 강력할 수 있음을 시사합니다.
      • 일반적으로 더 높은 레이저 스캐닝 속도와 더 낮은 전력 외에도 안정적인 키홀과 최소 유체 속도는 또한 흩어진 입자 형성을 완화하고 레이저 단일 트랙에서 에피택셜 성장을 보존합니다.

      References

      1. R.C. Reed: The Superalloys: Fundamentals and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, pp.17–20.Book Google Scholar 
      2. A. Basak, R. Acharya, and S. Das: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2016, vol. 47A, pp. 3845–59.Article Google Scholar 
      3. J. Vitek: Acta Mater., 2005, vol. 53, pp. 53–67.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      4. R. Vilar and A. Almeida: J. Laser Appl., 2015, vol. 27, p. S17004.Article Google Scholar 
      5. T. Kalfhaus, M. Schneider, B. Ruttert, D. Sebold, T. Hammerschmidt, J. Frenzel, R. Drautz, W. Theisen, G. Eggeler, O. Guillon, and R. Vassen: Mater. Des., 2019, vol. 168, p. 107656.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      6. S.S. Babu, S.A. David, J.W. Park, and J.M. Vitek: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2004, vol. 9, pp. 1–12.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      7. L. Felberbaum, K. Voisey, M. Gäumann, B. Viguier, and A. Mortensen: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, vol. 299, pp. 152–56.Article Google Scholar 
      8. S. Mokadem, C. Bezençon, J.M. Drezet, A. Jacot, J.D. Wagnière, and W. Kurz: TMS Annual Meeting, 2004, pp. 67–76.
      9. J.M. Vitek: ASM Proc. Int. Conf. Trends Weld. Res., vol. 2005, pp. 773–79.
      10. J.M. Vitek, S. Babu, and S. David: Process Optimization for Welding Single-Crystal Nickel-Bbased Superalloyshttps://technicalreports.ornl.gov/cppr/y2001/pres/120424.pdf
      11. J.D. Hunt: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1984, vol. 65, pp. 75–83.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      12. M. Gäumann, R. Trivedi, and W. Kurz: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, vol. 226–228, pp. 763–69.Article Google Scholar 
      13. M. Gäumann, S. Henry, F. Cléton, J.D. Wagnière, and W. Kurz: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, vol. 271, pp. 232–41.Article Google Scholar 
      14. M. Gäumann, C. Bezençon, P. Canalis, and W. Kurz: Acta Mater., 2001, vol. 49, pp. 1051–62.Article Google Scholar 
      15. J.M. Vitek, S.A. David, and S.S. Babu: Welding and Weld Repair of Single Crystal Gas Turbine Alloyshttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stan-David/publication/238692931_WELDING_AND_WELD_REPAIR_OF_SINGLE_CRYSTAL_GAS_TURBINE_ALLOYS/links/00b4953204ab35bbad000000/WELDING-AND-WELD-REPAIR-OF-SINGLE-CRYSTAL-GAS-TURBINE-ALLOYS.pdf
      16. B. Kianian: Wohlers Report 2017: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry, Annual Worldwide Progress Report, Wohlers Associates, Inc., Fort Collins, 2017.Google Scholar 
      17. M. Ramsperger, L. Mújica Roncery, I. Lopez-Galilea, R.F. Singer, W. Theisen, and C. Körner: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2015, vol. 17, pp. 1486–93.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      18. A.B. Parsa, M. Ramsperger, A. Kostka, C. Somsen, C. Körner, and G. Eggeler: Metals, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 258-1–17.Article Google Scholar 
      19. C. Körner, M. Ramsperger, C. Meid, D. Bürger, P. Wollgramm, M. Bartsch, and G. Eggeler: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2018, vol. 49A, pp. 3781–92.Article Google Scholar 
      20. D. Bürger, A. Parsa, M. Ramsperger, C. Körner, and G. Eggeler: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, vol. 762, p. 138098,Article Google Scholar 
      21. J. Pistor and C. Körner: Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 11, p. 24482.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      22. I. Lopez-Galilea, B. Ruttert, J. He, T. Hammerschmidt, R. Drautz, B. Gault, and W. Theisen: Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 30, p. 100874.CAS Google Scholar 
      23. N. Lu, Z. Lei, K. Hu, X. Yu, P. Li, J. Bi, S. Wu, and Y. Chen: Addit. Manuf., 2020, vol. 34, p. 101228.CAS Google Scholar 
      24. K. Chen, R. Huang, Y. Li, S. Lin, W. Zhu, N. Tamura, J. Li, Z.W. Shan, and E. Ma: Adv. Mater., 2020, vol. 32, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar 
      25. W.J. Sames, F.A. List, S. Pannala, R.R. Dehoff, and S.S. Babu: Int. Mater. Rev., 2016, vol. 61, pp. 315–60.Article Google Scholar 
      26. A. Basak, R. Acharya, and S. Das: Addit. Manuf., 2018, vol. 22, pp. 665–71.CAS Google Scholar 
      27. R. Jiang, A. Mostafaei, J. Pauza, C. Kantzos, and A.D. Rollett: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2019.03.103.Article Google Scholar 
      28. R. Cunningham, C. Zhao, N. Parab, C. Kantzos, J. Pauza, K. Fezzaa, T. Sun, and A.D. Rollett: Science, 2019, vol. 363, pp. 849–52.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      29. B. Fotovvati, S.F. Wayne, G. Lewis, and E. Asadi: Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, vol. 2018, p. 4920718.Article Google Scholar 
      30. P.-J. Chiang, R. Jiang, R. Cunningham, N. Parab, C. Zhao, K. Fezzaa, T. Sun, and A.D. Rollett: in Advanced Real Time Imaging II, pp. 77–85.
      31. J. Ye, S.A. Khairallah, A.M. Rubenchik, M.F. Crumb, G. Guss, J. Belak, and M.J. Matthews: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2019, vol. 21, pp. 1–9.Article Google Scholar 
      32. C. Zhao, Q. Guo, X. Li, N. Parab, K. Fezzaa, W. Tan, L. Chen, and T. Sun: Phys. Rev. X, 2019, vol. 9, p. 021052.CAS Google Scholar 
      33. S.A. Khairallah, A.T. Anderson, A. Rubenchik, and W.E. King: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 108, pp. 36–45.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      34. N. Kouraytem, X. Li, R. Cunningham, C. Zhao, N. Parab, T. Sun, A.D. Rollett, A.D. Spear, and W. Tan: Appl. Phys. Rev., 2019, vol. 11, p. 064054.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      35. T. DebRoy, H. Wei, J. Zuback, T. Mukherjee, J. Elmer, J. Milewski, A. Beese, A. Wilson-Heid, A. De, and W. Zhang: Prog. Mater. Sci., 2018, vol. 92, pp. 112–224.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      36. J.H. Cho and S.J. Na: J. Phys. D, 2006, vol. 39, pp. 5372–78.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      37. I. Yadroitsev, A. Gusarov, I. Yadroitsava, and I. Smurov: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2010, vol. 210, pp. 1624–31.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      38. S. Ghosh, L. Ma, L.E. Levine, R.E. Ricker, M.R. Stoudt, J.C. Heigel, and J.E. Guyer: JOM, 2018, vol. 70, pp. 1011–16.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      39. Y. He, C. Montgomery, J. Beuth, and B. Webler: Mater. Des., 2019, vol. 183, p. 108126.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      40. D. Rosenthal: Weld. J., 1941, vol. 20, pp. 220–34.Google Scholar 
      41. M. Tang, P.C. Pistorius, and J.L. Beuth: Addit. Manuf., 2017, vol. 14, pp. 39–48.CAS Google Scholar 
      42. R.E. Aune, L. Battezzati, R. Brooks, I. Egry, H.J. Fecht, J.P. Garandet, M. Hayashi, K.C. Mills, A. Passerone, P.N. Quested, E. Ricci, F. Schmidt-Hohagen, S. Seetharaman, B. Vinet, and R.K. Wunderlich: Proc. Int.Symp. Superalloys Var. Deriv., 2005, pp. 467–76.
      43. B.C. Wilson, J.A. Hickman, and G.E. Fuchs: JOM, 2003, vol. 55, pp. 35–40.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      44. J.J. Valencia and P.N. Quested: ASM Handb., 2008, vol. 15, pp. 468–81.Google Scholar 
      45. H.L. Wei, J. Mazumder, and T. DebRoy: Sci. Rep., 2015, vol. 5, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar 
      46. N. Raghavan, R. Dehoff, S. Pannala, S. Simunovic, M. Kirka, J. Turner, N. Carlson, and S.S. Babu: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 112, pp. 303–14.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      47. R. Lin, H. Wang, F. Lu, J. Solomon, and B.E. Carlson: Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2017, vol. 108, pp. 244–56.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      48. M. Bayat, A. Thanki, S. Mohanty, A. Witvrouw, S. Yang, J. Thorborg, N.S. Tiedje, and J.H. Hattel: Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 30, p. 100835.CAS Google Scholar 
      49. K. Higuchi, H.-J. Fecht, and R.K. Wunderlich: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2007, vol. 9, pp. 349–54.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      50. Q. Guo, C. Zhao, M. Qu, L. Xiong, L.I. Escano, S.M.H. Hojjatzadeh, N.D. Parab, K. Fezzaa, W. Everhart, T. Sun, and L. Chen: Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 28, pp. 600–09.Google Scholar 
      51. J. Trapp, A.M. Rubenchik, G. Guss, and M.J. Matthews: Appl. Mater. Today, 2017, vol. 9, pp. 341–49.Article Google Scholar 
      52. M. Schneider, L. Berthe, R. Fabbro, and M. Muller: J. Phys. D, 2008, vol. 41, p. 155502.Article Google Scholar 
      53. Z. Gan, O.L. Kafka, N. Parab, C. Zhao, L. Fang, O. Heinonen, T. Sun, and W.K. Liu: Nat. Commun., 2021, vol. 12, p. 2379.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      54. B.J. Simonds, E.J. Garboczi, T.A. Palmer, and P.A. Williams: Appl. Phys. Rev., 2020, vol. 13, p. 024057.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      55. J. Dantzig and M. Rappaz: Solidification, 2nd ed., EPFL Press, Lausanne, 2016, pp. 483–532.Google Scholar 
      56. W. Tiller, K. Jackson, J. Rutter, and B. Chalmers: Acta Metall., 1953, vol. 1, pp. 428–37.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      57. D. Zhang, A. Prasad, M.J. Bermingham, C.J. Todaro, M.J. Benoit, M.N. Patel, D. Qiu, D.H. StJohn, M. Qian, and M.A. Easton: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2020, vol. 51A, pp. 4341–59.Article Google Scholar 
      58. F. Yan, W. Xiong, and E.J. Faierson: Materials, 2017, vol. 10, p. 1260.Article Google Scholar 
      59. W. Tan and Y.C. Shin: Comput. Mater. Sci., 2015, vol. 98, pp. 446–58.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      60. A. Hellawell, S. Liu, and S.Z. Lu: JOM, 1997, vol. 49, pp. 18–20.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      61. H. Ji: China Foundry, 2019, vol. 16, pp. 262–66.Article Google Scholar 
      62. J.M. Vitek, S.A. David, and L.A. Boatner: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 1997, vol. 2, pp. 109–18.Article CAS Google Scholar 
      63. X. Wang, J.A. Muñiz-Lerma, O. Sanchez-Mata, S.E. Atabay, M.A. Shandiz, and M. Brochu: Prog. Addit. Manuf., 2020, vol. 5, pp. 41–49.Article Google Scholar 

      Download references

      Effect of tailwater depth on non-cohesive earth dam failure due to overtopping

      Effect of tailwater depth on non-cohesive earth dam failure due to overtopping

      범람으로 인한 비점착성 흙댐 붕괴에 대한 테일워터 깊이의 영향

      ShaimaaAmanaMohamedAbdelrazek RezkbRabieaNasrc

      Abstract

      본 연구에서는 범람으로 인한 토사댐 붕괴에 대한 테일워터 깊이의 영향을 실험적으로 조사하였다. 테일워터 깊이의 네 가지 다른 값을 검사합니다. 각 실험에 대해 댐 수심 측량 프로파일의 진화, 고장 기간, 침식 체적 및 유출 수위곡선을 관찰하고 기록합니다.

      결과는 tailwater 깊이를 늘리면 고장 시간이 최대 57% 감소하고 상대적으로 침식된 마루 높이가 최대 77.6% 감소한다는 것을 보여줍니다. 또한 상대 배수 깊이가 3, 4, 5인 경우 누적 침식 체적의 감소는 각각 23, 36.5 및 75%인 반면 최대 유출량의 감소는 각각 7, 14 및 17.35%입니다.

      실험 결과는 침식 과정을 복제할 때 Flow 3D 소프트웨어의 성능을 평가하는 데 활용됩니다. 수치 모델은 비응집성 흙댐의 침식 과정을 성공적으로 시뮬레이션합니다.

      The influence of tailwater depth on earth dam failure due to overtopping is investigated experimentally in this work. Four different values of tailwater depths are examined. For each experiment, the evolution of the dam bathymetry profile, the duration of failure, the eroded volume, and the outflow hydrograph are observed and recorded. The results reveal that increasing the tailwater depth reduces the time of failure by up to 57% and decreases the relative eroded crest height by up to 77.6%. In addition, for relative tailwater depths equal to 3, 4, and 5, the reduction in the cumulative eroded volume is 23, 36.5, and 75%, while the reduction in peak discharge is 7, 14, and 17.35%, respectively. The experimental results are utilized to evaluate the performance of the Flow 3D software in replicating the erosion process. The numerical model successfully simulates the erosion process of non-cohesive earth dams.

      Keywords

      Earth dam, Eroded volume, Flow 3D model, Non-cohesive soil, Overtopping failure, Tailwater depth

      Notation

      d50

      Mean partical diameterWc

      Optimum water contentZo

      Dam height (cm)do

      Tailwater depth (cm)Zeroded

      Eroded height of the dam measured at distance of 0.7 m from the dam heel (cm)t

      Total time of failure (sec)t1

      Time of crest width erosion (sec)Zcrest

      The crest height (cm)Vtotal

      Total volume of the dam (m3)Veroded

      Cumulative eroded volume (m3)RMSE

      The statistical variable root- mean- square errord

      Degree of agreement indexyu.s.

      The upstream water depth (cm)yd.s

      The downstream water depth (cm)H

      Water surface elevation over sharp crested weir (cm)Q

      Outflow discharge (liter/sec)Qpeak

      Peak discharge (liter/sec)

      1. Introduction

      Earth dams are compacted structures composed of natural materials that are usually mined or quarried from local locations. The failures of the earth dams have proven to be deadly, destructive, and costly. According to People’s Daily, two earthen dams, Yong’an Dam and Xinfa Dam located in Hulun Buir City in North China’s Inner Mongolia failed on 2021, due to a surge in the water level of the Nuomin River caused by heavy rain. The dam breach affected 16,660 people, flooded 325,622 mu of farmland (21708.1 ha), and destroyed 22 bridges, 124 culverts, and 15.6 km of roadways. Also, the failure of south fork dam (earth and rock fill dam) near Johnstown on 1889 is considered the worst U.S dam disaster in terms of loss of life. The dam was overtopped and washed away due to unexpected heavy rains, releasing 20 million tons of water which destroyed Johnstown and resulted in 2209 deaths, [1][2]. Piping or shear sliding, failure due to natural factors, and failure due to overtopping are all possible causes of earth dam failure. However, overtopping failure is the most frequent cause of dam failure. According to The International Committee on Large Dams (ICOLD, 1995), and [3], more than one-third of the total known dam failures were caused by dam overtopping.

      Overtopping occurs as the result of insufficient flood design or freeboard in some cases. Extreme rainstorms can cause floods which can overtop the dam and cause it to fail. The size and geometry of the reservoir or the dam (side slopes, top width, height, etc.), the homogeneity of the material used in the construction of the dam, overtopping depth, and the presence or absence of tailwater are all elements that influence this type of failure which will be illustrated in the following literature. Overtopping failures of earth dams may be divided into several failure mechanisms based on the material composition and the inner structure of the dam. For cohesive earth dams because of low permeability, no seepage exists on the slopes. Erosion often begins at the earth dam toe during turbulent erosion and moves upstream, undercutting the slope, causing the removal of large chunks of materials. While for non-cohesive earth dams the downstream face of the dam flattens progressively and is often said to rotate around a point near the downstream toe [4][5][6] In the last few decades, the study of failures due to overtopping has gained popularity among researchers. The overtopping failure, in fact, has been widely investigated in coastal and river hydraulics and morpho dynamic. In addition, several laboratory experimental studies have been conducted in this field in order to better understand different involved factors. Also, many numerical types of research have been conducted to investigate the process of overtopping failure as well as the elements that influence this type of failure.

      Tabrizi et al. [5] conducted a series of embankment overtopping tests to find the effect of compaction on the failure of a homogenous sand embankment. A plane breach process occurred across the flume width due to the narrow flume width. They measured the downstream hydrographs and embankment surface profile for every case. They concluded that the peak discharge decreased with a high compaction level, while the time to peak increased. Kansoh et al. [6] studied experimentally the failure of compacted homogeneous non-cohesive earthen embankment due to overtopping. They investigated the influence of different shape parameters including the downstream slope, the crest width, and the height of the embankment on the erosion process. The erosion process was initiated by carving a pilot channel into the embankment crest. They evaluated the time of embankment failure for different shape parameters. They concluded that the failure time increases with increasing the downstream slope and the crest width. Zhu et al. [7] investigated experimentally the breaching of five embankments, one constructed with pure sand, and four with different sand-silt–clay mixtures. The erosion pattern was similar across the flume width. They stated that for cohesive soil mixtures the head cut erosion was the most important factor that affected the breach growth, while for non-cohesive soil the breach erosion was affected by shear erosion.

      Amaral et al. [8] studied experimentally the failure by overtopping for two embankments built from silt sand material. They studied the effect of the degree of compaction of the embankment and the geometry of the pilot channel carved at the centre of the dam crest. They studied two shapes of pilot channel a rectangular shape and triangular shape. They stated that the breach development is influenced by a higher degree of compaction, however, the pilot channel geometry did not influence the breach’s final form. Bereta et al. [9] studied experimentally the breach formation of five dam models, three of them were homogenous clay soil while two were sandy-clay mixtures. The erosion process was initiated by cutting a pilot channel at the centre of the dam crest. They observed the initiation of erosion, flow shear erosion, sidewall bottom erosion, and distinguished the soil mechanical slope mass failure from the head cut vertically and laterally during these tests. Verma et al. [10] investigated experimentally a two-dimensional erosion phenomenon due to overtopping by using a wooden fuse plug model and five different soils. They concluded that the erosion process was affected mostly by cohesiveness and degree of compaction. For cohesive soils, a head cut erosion was observed, while for non-cohesive soils surface erosion occurred gradually. Also, the dimensions of fuse plug, type of fill material, reservoir capacity, and inflow were found to affect the behaviour of the overall breaching process.

      Wu and Qin [11] studied the effect of adding coarse grains to the downstream face of a non-cohesive dam as a result of tailings deposition. The process of overtopping during tailings dam failures is analyzed and its effect on delaying the dam-break process and disaster mitigation are investigated. They found that the tested protective measures decreased the breach area, the maximum breaching flow discharge and flow velocity, and the downstream inundated area. Khankandi et al. [12] studied experimentally the effect of reservoir geometry on dam break flow in case of dry and wet bed conditions. They considered four different reservoir shapes, a long reservoir, a wide, a trapezoidal shaped and one with a 90◦ bend all with identical water volume and horizontal bed. The dam break is simulated by the sudden gate removal using a pneumatic jack. They measured the variation of water level over time with ultrasonic sensors and flow velocity component with an acoustic Doppler velocimeter. Also, the experimental results of water level variation are compared with Ritters solution (1892) [13]. They stated that for dry bed condition the long and 90 bend reservoirs results are close to the analytical solution by ritter also in these two shapes a 1D flow is noticed. However, for wide and trapezoidal reservoirs a 2D effect is significant due to flow contraction at channel entrance.

      Rifai et al. [14] conducted a series of experiments to investigate the effect of tailwater depth on the outflow discharge and breach geometry during non-cohesive homogenous fluvial dikes overtopping failure. They cut an initial notch in the crest at 0.8 m from the upstream end of the dike to initiate overtopping. They compared their results to previous experiments under different main channel inflow discharges combined with a free floodplain. They divided the dike breaching process into three stages: gradual start of overtopping flow resulting in slow initiation of dike erosion, deepening and widening breach due to large flow depth and velocity, finally the flow depth starts stabilizing at its minimal level with or without sustained breach expansion. They stated that breach discharge has lower values than in free floodplain tests. Jiang [15] studied the effect of bed slope on breach parameters and peak discharge in non-cohesive embankment failure. An initial triangular breach with a depth and width of 4 cm was pre-set on one side of the dam. He stated that peak discharge increases with the increase of bed slope and then decreases.

      Ozmen-cagatay et al. [16] studied experimentally flood wave propagation resulted from a sudden dam break event. For dam-break modelling, they used a mechanism that permitted the rapid removal of a vertical plate with a thickness of 4 mm and made of rigid plastic. They conducted three tests, one with dry bed condition and two tests with tailwater depths equal 0.025 m and 0.1 m respectively. They recorded the free surface profile during initial stages of dam break by using digital image processing. Finally, they compared the experimental results with the with a commercially available VOF-based CFD program solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier –Stokes equations (RANS) with the k– Ɛ turbulence model and the shallow water equations (SWEs). They concluded that Wave breaking was delayed with increasing the tailwater depth to initial reservoir depth ratio. They also stated that the SWE approach is sufficient more to represent dam break flows for wet bed condition. Evangelista [17] investigated experimentally and numerically using a depth-integrated two-phase model, the erosion of sand dike caused by the impact of a dam break wave. The dam break is simulated by a sudden opening of an upstream reservoir gate resulting in the overtopping of a downstream trapezoidal sand dike. The evolution of the water wave caused from the gate opening and dike erosion process are recorded by using a computer-controlled camera. The experimental results demonstrated that the progression of the wave front and dike erosion have a considerable influence on each other during the process. In addition, the dike constructed from fine sands was more resistant to erosion than the one built with coarse sand. They also stated that the numerical model can is capable of accurately predicting wave front position and dike erosion. Also, Di Cristo et al. [18] studied the effect of dam break wave propagation on a sand embankment both experimentally and numerically using a two-phase shallow-water model. The evolution of free surface and of the embankment bottom are recorded and used in numerical model assessment. They stated that the model allows reasonable simulation of the experimental trends of the free surface elevation regardeless of the geofailure operator.

      Lots of numerical models have been developed over the past few years to simulate the dam break flooding problem. A one-dimensional model, such as Hec-Ras, DAMBRK and MIKE 11, ect. A two-dimensional model such as iRIC Nay2DH is used in earth embankment breach simulation. Other researchers studied the failure process numerically using (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, such as FLOW-3D, and FLUENT. Goharnejad et al. [19] determined the outflow hydrograph which results from the embankment dam break due to overtopping. Hu et al. [20] performed a comparison between Flow-3D and MIKE3 FM numerical models in simulating a dam break event under dry and wet bed conditions with different tailwater depths. Kaurav et al. [21] simulated a planar dam breach process due to overtopping. They conducted a sensitivity analysis to find the effect of dam material, dam height, downstream slope, crest width, and inlet discharge on the erosion process and peak discharge through breach. They concluded that downstream slope has a significant influence on breaching process. Yusof et al. [22] studied the effect of embankment sediment sizes and inflow rates on breaching geometric and hydrodynamic parameters. They stated that the peak outflow hydrograph increases with increasing sediment size and inflow rates while time of failure decreases.

      In the present work, the effect of tailwater depth on earth dam failure during overtopping is studied experimentally. The relation between the eroded volume of the dam and the tailwater depth is presented. Also, the percentage of reduction in peak discharge due to tailwater existence is calculated. An assessment of Flow 3D software performance in simulating the erosion process during earth dam failure is introduced. The statistical variable root- mean- square error, RMSE, and the agreement degree index, d, are used in model assessment.

      2. Material and methods

      The tests are conducted in a straight rectangular flume in the laboratory of Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Egypt. The flume dimensions are 10 m long, 0.86 m wide, and 0.5 m deep. The front part of the flume is connected to a storage basin 1 m long by 0.86 m wide. The storage basin is connected to a collecting tank for water recirculation during the experiments as shown in Fig. 1Fig. 2. A sharp-crested weir is placed at a distance of 4 m downstream the constructed dam to keep a constant tailwater depth in each experiment and to measure the outflow discharge.

      To measure the eroded volume with time a rods technique is used. This technique consists of two parallel wooden plates with 10 cm distance in between and five rows of stainless-steel rods passing vertically through the wooden plates at a spacing of 20 cm distributed across flume width. Each row consists of four rods with 15 cm spacing between them. Also, a graph board is provided to measure the drop in each rod with time as shown in Fig. 3Fig. 4. After dam construction the rods are carefully rested on the dam, with the first line of rods resting in the middle of the dam crest and then a constant distance of 15 cm between rods lines is maintained.

      A soil sample is taken and tested in the laboratory of the soil mechanics to find the soil geotechnical parameters. The soil particle size distribution is also determined by sieve analysis as shown in Fig. 5. The soil mean diameter d50,equals 0.38 mm and internal friction angle equals 32.6°.

      2.1. Experimental procedures

      To investigate the effect of the tailwater depth (do), the tailwater depth is changed four times 5, 15, 20, and 25 cm on the sand dam model. The dam profile is 35 cm height, with crest width = 15 cm, the dam base width is 155 cm, and the upstream and downstream slopes are 2:1 as shown in Fig. 6. The dam dimensions are set as the flume permitted to allow observation of the dam erosion process under the available flume dimensions and conditions. All of the conducted experiments have the same dimensions and configurations.

      The optimum water content, Wc, from the standard proctor test is found to be 8 % and the maximum dry unit weight is 19.42 kN/m3. The soil and water are mixed thoroughly to ensure consistency and then placed on three horizontal layers. Each layer is compacted according to ASTM standard with 25 blows by using a rammer (27 cm × 20.5 cm) weighing 4 kg. Special attention is paid to the compaction of the soil to guarantee the repeatability of the tests.

      After placing and compacting the three layers, the dam slopes are trimmed carefully to form the trapezoidal shape of the dam. A small triangular pilot channel with 1 cm height and 1:1 side slopes is cut into the dam crest to initiate the erosion process. The position of triangular pilot channel is presented in Fig. 1. Three digital video cameras with a resolution of 1920 × 1080 pixels and a frame rate of 60 fps are placed in three different locations. One camera on one side of the flume to record the progress of the dam profile during erosion. Another to track the water level over the sharp-crested rectangular weir placed at the downstream end of the flume. And the third camera is placed above the flume at the downstream side of the dam and in front of the rods to record the drop of the tip of the rods with time as shown previously in Fig. 1.

      Before starting the experiment, the water is pumped into the storage basin by using pump with capacity 360 m3/hr, and then into the upstream section of the flume. The upstream boundary is an inflow condition. The flow discharge provided to the storage basin is kept at a constant rate of 6 L/sec for all experiments, while the downstream boundary is an outflow boundary condition.

      Also, the required tailwater depth for each experiment is filled to the desired depth. A dye container valve is opened to color the water upstream of the dam to make it easy to distinguish the dam profile from the water profile. A wooden board is placed just upstream of the dam to prevent water from overtopping the dam until the water level rises to a certain level above the dam crest and then the wooden board is removed slowly to start the experiment.

      2.2. Repeatability

      To verify the accuracy of the results, each experiment is repeated two times under the same conditions. Fig. 7 shows the relative eroded crest height, Zeroded / Zo, with time for 5 cm tailwater depth. From the Figure, it can be noticed that results for all runs are consistent, and accuracy is achieved.

      3. Numerical model

      The commercially available numerical model, Flow 3D is used to simulate the dam failure due to overtopping for the cases of 15 cm, 20 cm and 25 cm tailwater depths. For numerical model calibration, experimental results for dam surface evolution are used. The numerical model is calibrated for selection of the optimal turbulence model (RNG, K-e, and k-w) and sediment scour equations (Van Rin, Meyer- peter and Muller, and Nielsen) that produce the best results. In this, the flow field is solved by the RNG turbulence model, and the van Rijn equation is used for the sediment scour model. A geometry file is imported before applying the mesh.

      A Mesh sensitivity is analyzed and checked for various cell sizes, and it is found that decreasing the cell size significantly increases the simulation time with insignificant differences in the result. It is noticed that the most important factor influencing cell size selection is the value of the dam’s upstream and downstream slopes. For example, the slopes in the dam model are 2:1, thus the cell size ratio in X and Z directions should be 2:1 as well. The cell size in a mesh block is set to be 0.02 m, 0.025 m, and 0.01 m in X, Y and Z directions respectively.

      In the numerical computations, the boundary conditions employed are the walls for sidewalls and the channel bottom. The pressure boundary condition is applied at the top, at the air–water interface, to account for atmospheric pressure on the free surface. The upstream boundary is volume flow rate while the downstream boundary is outflow discharge.

      The initial condition is a fluid region, which is used to define fluid areas both upstream and downstream of the dam. To assess the model accuracy, the statistical variable root- mean- square error, RMSE, and the agreement degree index, d, are calculated as(1)RMSE=1N∑i=1N(Pi-Mi)2(2)d=1-∑Mi-Pi2∑Mi-M¯+Pi-P¯2

      where N is the number of samples, Pi and Mi are the models and experimental values, P and M are the means of the model and experimental values. The best fit between the experimental and model results would have an RMSE = 0 and degree of agreement, d = 1.

      4. Results of experimental work

      The results of the total time of failure, t (defined as the time from when the water begins to overtop the dam crest until the erosion reaches a steady state, when no erosion occurs), time of crest width erosion t1, cumulative eroded volume Veroded, and peak discharge Qpeak for each experiment are listed in Table 1. The case of 5 cm tailwater depth is considered as a reference case in this work.

      Table 1. Results of experimental work.

      Tailwater depth, do (cm)Total time of failure, t (sec)Time of crest width erosion, t1 (sec)cumulative eroded volume, Veroded (m3)Peak discharge, Qpeak (liter/sec)
      5255220.2113.12
      15165300.1612.19
      20140340.1311.29
      25110390.0510.84

      5. Discussion

      5.1. Side erosion

      The evolution of the bathymetry of the erosion line recorded by the video camera1. The videos are split into frames (60 frames/sec) by the Free Video to JPG Converter v.5.063 build and then converted into an excel spreadsheet using MATLAB code as shown in Fig. 8.

      Fig. 9 shows a sample of numerical model output. Fig. 10Fig. 11Fig. 12 show a dam profile development for different time steps from both experimental and numerical model, for tailwater depths equal 15 cm, 20 cm and 25 cm. Also, the values of RMSE and d for each figure are presented. The comparison shows that the Flow 3D software can simulate the erosion process of non-cohesive earth dam during overtopping with an RMSE value equals 0.023, 0.0218, and 0.0167 and degree of agreement, d, equals 0.95, 0.968, and 0.988 for relative tailwater depths, do/(do)ref, = 3, 4 and 5, respectively. The low values of RMSE and high values of d show that the Flow 3D can effectively simulate the erosion process. From Fig. 10Fig. 11Fig. 12, it can be noticed that the model is not capable of reproducing the head cut, while it can simulate well the degradation of the crest height with a minor difference from experimental work. The reason of this could be due to inability of simulation of all physical conditions which exists in the experimental work, such as channel friction and the grain size distribution of the dam soil which is surely has a great effect on the erosion process and breach development. In the experimental work the grain size distribution is shown in Fig. 5, while the numerical model considers that the soil is uniform and exactly 50 % of the dam particles diameter are equal to the d50 value. Another reason is that the model is not considering the increased resistance of the dam due to the apparent cohesion which happens due to dam saturation [23].

      It is clear from both the experimental and numerical results that for a 5 cm tailwater depth, do/(do)ref = 1.0, erosion begins near the dam toe and continues upward on the downstream slope until it reaches the crest. After eroding the crest width, the crest is lowered, resulting in increased flow rates and the speeding up of the erosion process. While for relative tailwater depths, do/(do)ref = 3, 4, and 5 erosion starts at the point of intersection between the downstream slope and tailwater. The existence of tailwater works as an energy dissipater for the falling water which reduces the erosion process and prevents the dam from failure as shown in Fig. 13. It is found that the time of the failure decreases with increasing the tailwater depth because most of the dam height is being submerged with water which decreases the erosion process. The reduction in time of failure from the referenced case is found to be 35.3, 45, and 57 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref equals 3, 4, and 5, respectively.

      The relation between the relative eroded crest height, Zeroded /Zo, with time is drawn as shown in Fig. 14. It is found that the relative eroded crest height decreases with increasing tailwater depth by 10, 41, and 77.6 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref equals 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The time required for the erosion of the crest width, t1, is calculated for each experiment. The relation between relative tailwater depth and relative time of crest width erosion is shown in Fig. 15. It is found that the time of crest width erosion increases linearly with increasing, do /Zo. The percent of increase is 36.4, 54.5 and 77.3 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref = 3, 4 and 5, respectively.

      Crest height, Zcrest is calculated from the experimental results and the Flow 3D results for relative tailwater depths, do/(do)ref, = 3, 4, and 5. A relation between relative crest height, Zcrest/Zo with time from experimental and numerical results is presented in Fig. 16. From Fig. 16, it is seen that there is a good consistency between the results of numerical model and the experimental results in the case of tracking the erosion of the crest height with time.

      5.2. Upstream and downstream water depths

      It is noticed that at the beginning of the erosion process, both upstream and downstream water depths increase linearly with time as long as erosion of the crest height did not take place. However, when the crest height starts to lower the upstream water depth decreases with time while the downstream water depth increases. At the end of the experiment, the two depths are nearly equal. A relation between relative downstream and upstream water depths with time is drawn for each experiment as shown in Fig. 17.

      5.3. Eroded volume

      A MATLAB code is used to calculate the cumulative eroded volume every time interval for each experiment. The total volume of the dam, Vtotal is 0.256 m3. The cumulative eroded volume, Veroded is 0.21, 0.16, 0.13, and 0.05 m3 for tailwater depths, do = 5, 15, 20, and 25 cm, respectively. Fig. 18 presents the relation between cumulative eroded volume, Veroded and time. From Fig. 18, it is observed that the cumulative eroded volume decreases with increasing the tailwater depth. The reduction in cumulative eroded volume is 23, 36.5, and 75 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref = 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The relative remained volume of the dam equals 0.18, 0.375, 0.492, and 0.8 for tailwater depths = 5, 15, 20, and 25 cm, respectively. Fig. 19 shows a relation between relative tailwater depth and relative cumulative eroded volume from experimental results. From that figure, it is noticed that the eroded volume decreases exponentially with increasing relative tailwater depth.

      5.4. The outflow discharge

      The inflow discharge provided to the storage tank is maintained constant for all experiments. The water surface elevation, H, over the sharp-crested weir placed at the downstream side is recorded by the video camera 2. For each experiment, the outflow discharge is then calculated by using the sharp-crested rectangular weir equation every 10 sec.

      The outflow discharge is found to increase rapidly until it reaches its peak then it decreases until it is constant. For high values of tailwater depths, the peak discharge becomes less than that in the case of small tailwater depth as shown in Fig. 20 which agrees well with the results of Rifai et al. [14] The reduction in peak discharge is 7, 14, and 17.35 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref = 3, 4, and 5, respectively.

      The scenario presented in this article in which the tailwater depth rises due to unexpected heavy rainfall, is investigated to find the effect of rising tailwater depth on earth dam failure. The results revealed that rising tailwater depth positively affects the process of dam failure in terms of preventing the dam from complete failure and reducing the outflow discharge.

      6. Conclusions

      The effect of tailwater depth on earth dam failure due to overtopping is investigated experimentally in this work. The study focuses on the effect of tailwater depth on side erosion, upstream and downstream water depths, eroded volume, outflow hydrograph, and duration of the failure process. The Flow 3D numerical software is used to simulate the dam failure, and a comparison is made between the experimental and numerical results to find the ability of this software to simulate the erosion process. The following are the results of the investigation:

      The existence of tailwater with high depths prevents the dam from completely collapsing thereby turning it into a broad crested weir. The failure time decreases with increasing the tailwater depth and the reduction from the reference case is found to be 35.3, 45, and 57 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref = 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The difference between the upstream and downstream water depths decreases with time till it became almost negligible at the end of the experiment. The reduction in cumulative eroded volume is 23, 36.5, and 75 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref = 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The peak discharge decreases by 7, 14, and 17.35 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref = 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The relative eroded crest height decreases linearly with increasing the tailwater depth by 10, 41, and 77.6 % for relative tailwater depth, do /(do)ref = 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The numerical model can reproduce the erosion process with a minor deviation from the experimental results, particularly in terms of tracking the degradation of the crest height with time.

      Declaration of Competing Interest

      The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

      Reference

      [1]

      D. McCullough

      The Johnstown Flood

      Simon and Schuster, NY (1968)

      Google Scholar[2]Rose AT. The influence of dam failures on dam safety laws in Pennsylvania. Association of State Dam Safety Officials Annual Conference 2013, Dam Safety 2013. 2013;1:738–56.

      Google Scholar[3]

      M. Foster, R. Fell, M. Spannagle

      The statistics of embankment dam failures and accidents

      Can Geotech J, 37 (5) (2000), pp. 1000-1024, 10.1139/t00-030 View PDF

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[4]Pickert, G., Jirka, G., Bieberstein, A., Brauns, J. Soil/water interaction during the breaching process of overtopped embankments. In: Greco, M., Carravetta, A., Morte, R.D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference River-Flow 2004, Balkema.

      Google Scholar[5]

      A. Asghari Tabrizi, E. Elalfy, M. Elkholy, M.H. Chaudhry, J. Imran

      Effects of compaction on embankment breach due to overtopping

      J Hydraul Res, 55 (2) (2017), pp. 236-247, 10.1080/00221686.2016.1238014 View PDF

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[6]

      R.M. Kansoh, M. Elkholy, G. Abo-Zaid

      Effect of Shape Parameters on Failure of Earthen Embankment due to Overtopping

      KSCE J Civ Eng, 24 (5) (2020), pp. 1476-1485, 10.1007/s12205-020-1107-x View PDF

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[7]

      YongHui Zhu, P.J. Visser, J.K. Vrijling, GuangQian Wang

      Experimental investigation on breaching of embankments

      Experimental investigation on breaching of embankments, 54 (1) (2011), pp. 148-155 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[8]Amaral S, Jónatas R, Bento AM, Palma J, Viseu T, Cardoso R, et al. Failure by overtopping of earth dams. Quantification of the discharge hydrograph. Proceedings of the 3rd IAHR Europe Congress: 14-15 April 2014, Portugal. 2014;(1):182–93.

      Google Scholar[9]

      G. Bereta, P. Hui, H. Kai, L. Guang, P. Kefan, Y.Z. Zhao

      Experimental study of cohesive embankment dam breach formation due to overtopping

      Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 64 (1) (2020), pp. 198-211, 10.3311/PPci.14565 View PDF

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[10]

      D.K. Verma, B. Setia, V.K. Arora

      Experimental study of breaching of an earthen dam using a fuse plug model

      Int J Eng Trans A, 30 (4) (2017), pp. 479-485, 10.5829/idosi.ije.2017.30.04a.04 View PDF

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[11]Wu T, Qin J. Experimental Study of a Tailings Impoundment Dam Failure Due to Overtopping. Mine Water and the Environment [Internet]. 2018;37(2):272–80. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s10230-018-0529-x.

      Google Scholar[12]

      A. Feizi Khankandi, A. Tahershamsi, S. Soares-Frazo

      Experimental investigation of reservoir geometry effect on dam-break flow

      J Hydraul Res, 50 (4) (2012), pp. 376-387 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[13]

      A. Ritter

      Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen (The propagation of water waves)

      Zeitschrift Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 36 (33) (1892), pp. 947-954

      [in German]

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[14]

      I. Rifai, K. El Kadi Abderrezzak, S. Erpicum, P. Archambeau, D. Violeau, M. Pirotton, et al.

      Floodplain Backwater Effect on Overtopping Induced Fluvial Dike Failure

      Water Resour Res, 54 (11) (2018), pp. 9060-9073 View PDF

      This article is free to access.

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[15]

      X. Jiang

      Laboratory Experiments on Breaching Characteristics of Natural Dams on Sloping Beds

      Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019 (2019), pp. 1-14

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[16]

      H. Ozmen-Cagatay, S. Kocaman

      Dam-break flows during initial stage using SWE and RANS approaches

      J Hydraul Res, 48 (5) (2010), pp. 603-611 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[17]

      S. Evangelista

      Experiments and numerical simulations of dike erosion due to a wave impact

      Water (Switzerland), 7 (10) (2015), pp. 5831-5848 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[18]

      C. Di Cristo, S. Evangelista, M. Greco, M. Iervolino, A. Leopardi, A. Vacca

      Dam-break waves over an erodible embankment: experiments and simulations

      J Hydraul Res, 56 (2) (2018), pp. 196-210 View PDF

      CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[19]Goharnejad H, Sm M, Zn M, Sadeghi L, Abadi K. Numerical Modeling and Evaluation of Embankment Dam Break Phenomenon (Case Study : Taleghan Dam) ISSN : 2319-9873. 2016;5(3):104–11.

      Google Scholar[20]Hu H, Zhang J, Li T. Dam-Break Flows : Comparison between Flow-3D , MIKE 3 FM , and Analytical Solutions with Experimental Data. 2018;1–24. doi: 10.3390/app8122456.

      Google Scholar[21]

      R. Kaurav, P.K. Mohapatra, D. Ph

      Studying the Peak Discharge through a Planar Dam Breach, 145 (6) (2019), pp. 1-8 View PDF

      CrossRef[22]

      Z.M. Yusof, Z.A.L. Shirling, A.K.A. Wahab, Z. Ismail, S. Amerudin

      A hydrodynamic model of an embankment breaching due to overtopping flow using FLOW-3D

      IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 920 (1) (2021)

      Google Scholar[23]

      G. Pickert, V. Weitbrecht, A. Bieberstein

      Breaching of overtopped river embankments controlled by apparent cohesion

      J Hydraul Res, 49 (2) (Apr. 2011), pp. 143-156, 10.1080/00221686.2011.552468 View PDF

      View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar

      Cited by (0)

      My name is Shaimaa Ibrahim Mohamed Aman and I am a teaching assistant in Irrigation and Hydraulics department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. I graduated from the Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University in 2013. I had my MSc in Irrigation and Hydraulic Engineering in 2017. My research interests lie in the area of earth dam Failures.

      Peer review under responsibility of Ain Shams University.

      © 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University.

      FLOW-3D 수치해석용 컴퓨터 선택 가이드 (update)

      Hardware Selection for FLOW-3D Products – FLOW-3D

      2022-12-07 부분 업데이트 / ㈜에스티아이씨앤디 솔루션사업부

      In this blog, Flow Science’s IT Manager Matthew Taylor breaks down the different hardware components and suggests some ideal configurations for getting the most out of your FLOW-3D products.

      개요

      본 자료는 Flow Science의 IT 매니저 Matthew Taylor가 작성한 자료를 기반으로 STI C&D에서 일부 자료를 보완한 자료입니다. 본 자료를 통해 FLOW-3D 사용자는 최상의 해석용 컴퓨터를 선택할 때 도움을 받을 수 있을 것으로 기대합니다.

      수치해석을 하는 엔지니어들은 사용하는 컴퓨터의 성능에 무척 민감합니다. 그 이유는 수치해석을 하기 위해 여러 준비단계와 분석 시간들이 필요하지만 당연히 압도적으로 시간을 소모하는 것이 계산 시간이기 때문일 것입니다.

      따라서 수치해석용 컴퓨터의 선정을 위해서 단위 시간당 시스템이 처리하는 작업의 수나 처리량, 응답시간, 평균 대기 시간 등의 요소를 복합적으로 검토하여 결정하게 됩니다.

      또한 수치해석에 적합한 성능을 가진 컴퓨터를 선별하는 방법으로 CPU 계산 처리속도인 Flops/sec 성능도 중요하지만 수치해석을 수행할 때 방대한 계산 결과를 디스크에 저장하고, 해석결과를 분석할 때는 그래픽 성능도 크게 좌우하기 때문에 SSD 디스크와 그래픽카드에도 관심을 가져야 합니다.

      FLOW SCIENCE, INC. 에서는 일반적인 FLOW-3D를 지원하는 최소 컴퓨터 사양과 O/S 플랫폼 가이드를 제시하지만, 도입 담당자의 경우, 최상의 조건에서 해석 업무를 수행해야 하기 때문에 가능하면 최고의 성능을 제공하는 해석용 장비 도입이 필요합니다. 이 자료는 2022년 현재 FLOW-3D 제품을 효과적으로 사용하기 위한 하드웨어 선택에 대해 사전에 검토되어야 할 내용들에 대해 자세히 설명합니다. 그리고 실행 중인 시뮬레이션 유형에 따라 다양한 구성에 대한 몇 가지 아이디어를 제공합니다.

      CPU 최신 뉴스

      2022년 11월 23일 기준 (https://www.itworld.co.kr/news/265948 기사 원문 발췌)

      ⓒ Rob Schultz/IDG
      ⓒ Rob Schultz/IDG
      • 현재 AMD의 라이젠 7000 시리즈와 인텔 13세대 코어 CPU는 환상적인 성능을 제공하나 앞으로는 더욱 좋은 칩이 출시될 예정이다. 물론 강력한 성능을 원한다면 고민할 필요도 없이 최대한 빠른 클럭 속도, 최대한 많은 코어 수를 찾으면 된다. 여기서 어려운 부분은 새로운 칩 라인업의 복잡하다는 것이다. 특히 최신 프로세서와 지난 세대 최상급 프로세서 중에서 고민한다면 여러 부분을 세밀하게 이해해야 한다.
      • 모든 CFD 엔지니어의 고민은 예산이 넉넉하여 무조건 최고 사양의 제품을 구매하면 간단하지만, 현실의 예산은 그렇지 못하기 때문에 선택의 기로에서 힘들어 한다.
      • 현재 워크스테이션에서 최고 사양은 AMD 라이젠 스레드리퍼 PRO 5995WX 샤갈 프로 거의 슈퍼컴퓨터 수준이다. 가격 조회 사이트인 다나와에서 현재 일자(2022년 12월 07일) 기준으로 검색해 보면 CPU 가격만 1000만원대인 매우 고가의 CPU인 것을 알 수 있다.
      • AMD와 인텔의 최신 아키텍처는 모두 성능만큼 에너지 소비량도 늘어난다. AMD의 라이젠 7950X와 인텔의 코어 i9-13900K는 DDR5 RAM을 지원한다.
      • 다양한 가격대의 CPU가 있으므로 아래 CPU 성능 차트의 성능대비 가격을 보고 CPU를 선택하도록 한다.
      인텔® 코어™ i9-13900K 프로세서(36M 캐시, 최대 5.80GHz)
      인텔® 코어™ i9-13900K 프로세서(36M 캐시, 최대 5.80GHz)

      완제품의 경우 그래픽 카드에 따라 가격이 심하게 차이가 나기 때문에 단순 비교가 어려우므로, 구입사양을 정하고 검색을 통해 적당한 제품을 선정하면 된다.

      CPU의 선택

      CPU는 전반적인 성능에 큰 영향을 미치며, 대부분의 경우 컴퓨터의 가장 중요한 구성 요소입니다. 그러나 데스크탑 프로세서를 구입할 때가 되면 Intel 과 AMD의 모델 번호와 사양을 이해하는 것이 어려워 보일 것입니다.
      그리고, CPU 성능을 평가하는 방법에 의해 가장 좋은 CPU를 고른다고 해도 보드와, 메모리, 주변 Chip 등 여러가지 조건에 의해 성능이 달라질 수 있기 때문에 성능평가 결과를 기준으로 시스템을 구입할 경우, 단일 CPU나 부품으로 순위가 정해진 자료보다는 시스템 전체를 대상으로 평가한 순위표를 보고 선정하는 지혜가 필요합니다.

      PassMark – CPU Mark High End CPUs

      2022년 12월 07일 기준

      PassMark - CPU Mark
High End CPUs
Updated 6th of December 2022
      PassMark – CPU Mark High End CPUs Updated 6th of December 2022

      <출처> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

      수치해석을 수행하는 CPU의 경우 예산에 따라 Core가 많지 않은 CPU를 구매해야 하는 경우도 있을 수 있습니다. 보통 Core가 많다고 해석 속도가 선형으로 증가하지는 않으며, 해석 케이스에 따라 적정 Core수가 있습니다. 이 경우 예산에 맞는 성능 대비 최상의 코어 수가 있을 수 있기 때문에 Single thread Performance 도 매우 중요합니다. 아래 성능 도표를 참조하여 예산에 맞는 최적 CPU를 찾는데 도움을 받을 수 있습니다.

      PassMark - CPU Mark
Single Thread Performance
Updated 6th of December 2022
      PassMark – CPU Mark Single Thread Performance Updated 6th of December 2022

      출처 : https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html

      CPU 성능 분석 방법

      부동소수점 계산을 하는 수치해석과 밀접한 Computer의 연산 성능 벤치마크 방법은 대표적으로 널리 사용되는 아래와 같은 방법이 있습니다.

      FLOW-3D의 CFD 솔버 성능은 CPU의 부동 소수점 성능에 전적으로 좌우되기 때문에 계산 집약적인 프로그램입니다. FlowSight 또한 CPU에 크게 의존합니다. 현재 출시된 사용 가능한 모든 CPU를 벤치마킹할 수는 없지만 상대적인 성능을 합리적으로 비교할 수는 있습니다.

      특히, 수치해석 분야에서 주어진 CPU에 대해 FLOW-3D 성능을 추정하거나 여러 CPU 옵션 간의 성능을 비교하기 위한 최상의 옵션은 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation의 SPEC CPU2017 벤치마크(현재까지 개발된 가장 최신 평가기준임)이며, 특히 SPECspeed 2017 Floating Point 결과가 CFD Solver 성능을 매우 잘 예측합니다.

      이는 유료 벤치마크이므로 제공된 결과는 모든 CPU 테스트 결과를 제공하지 않습니다. 보통 제조사가 ASUS, Dell, Lenovo, HP, Huawei 정도의 제품에 대해 RAM이 많은 멀티 소켓 Intel Xeon 기계와 같은 값비싼 구성으로 된 장비 결과들을 제공합니다.

      CPU 비교를 위한 또 다른 옵션은 Passmark Software의 CPU 벤치마크입니다. PerformanceTest 제품군은 유료 소프트웨어이지만 무료 평가판을 사용할 수 있습니다. 대부분의 CPU는 저렴한 옵션을 포함하여 나열됩니다. 부동 소수점 성능은 전체 벤치마크의 한 측면에 불과하지만 다양한 워크로드에서 전반적인 성능을 제대로 테스트합니다.

      예산을 결정하고 해당 예산에 해당하는 CPU를 선택한 후에는 벤치마크를 사용하여 가격에 가장 적합한 성능을 결정할 수 있습니다.

      <참고>

      SPEC의 벤치 마크https://www.spec.org/benchmarks.html#cpu )

      SPEC CPU 2017 (현재까지 가장 최근에 개발된 CPU 성능측정 기준)

      다른 컴퓨터 시스템에서 컴퓨팅 계산에 대한 집약적인 워크로드를 비교하는데 사용할 수 있는 성능 측정을 제공하도록 설계된 SPEC CPU 2017에는 SPECspeed 2017 정수, SPECspeed 2017 부동 소수점, SPECrate 2017 정수 및 SPECrate 2017 부동 소수점의 4 가지 제품군으로 구성된 43 개의 벤치 마크가 포함되어 있습니다. SPEC CPU 2017에는 에너지 소비 측정을 위한 선택적 메트릭도 포함되어 있습니다.

      <SPEC CPU 벤치마크 보고서>

      벤치마크 결과보고서는 제조사별, 모델별로 테스트한 결과를 아래 사이트에 가면 볼 수 있습니다.

      https://www.spec.org/cgi-bin/osgresults

      <보고서 샘플>

      • SPEC CPU 2017

      Designed to provide performance measurements that can be used to compare compute-intensive workloads on different computer systems, SPEC CPU 2017 contains 43 benchmarks organized into four suites: SPECspeed 2017 Integer, SPECspeed 2017 Floating Point, SPECrate 2017 Integer, and SPECrate 2017 Floating Point. SPEC CPU 2017 also includes an optional metric for measuring energy consumption.

      클럭 대 코어

      일반적으로 클럭 속도가 높은 칩은 CPU 코어를 더 적게 포함합니다. FLOW-3D는 병렬화가 잘되어 있지만, 디스크 쓰기와 같이 일부 작업은 기본적으로 단일 스레드 방식으로 수행됩니다. 따라서 데이터 출력이 빈번하거나 큰 시뮬레이션은 종종 더 많은 코어가 아닌, 더 높은 클럭 속도를 활용합니다. 마찬가지로 코어 및 소켓의 다중 스레딩은 오버헤드를 발생시키므로 작은 문제의 해석일 경우 사용되는 코어 수를 제한하면 성능이 향상될 수 있습니다.

      CPU 아키텍처

      CPU 아키텍처는 중요합니다. 최신 CPU는 일반적으로 사이클당 더 많은 기능을 제공합니다. 즉, 현재 세대의 CPU는 일반적으로 동일한 클럭 속도에서 이전 CPU보다 성능이 우수합니다. 또한 전력 효율이 높아져 와트당 성능이 향상될 수 있습니다. Flow Science에는 구형 멀티 소켓 12, 16, 24 코어 Xeon보다 성능이 뛰어난 최근 세대 10~12 Core i9 CPU 시스템을 보유하고 있습니다.

      오버클럭

      해석용 장비에서는 CPU를 오버클럭 하지 않는 것이 좋습니다. 하드웨어를 다년간의 투자라고 생각한다면, 오버클럭화는 발열을 증가시켜 수명을 단축시킵니다. CPU에 따라 안정성도 저하될 수 있습니다. CPU를 오버클럭 할 때는 세심한 열 관리가 권장됩니다.

      하이퍼스레딩

      <이미지출처:https://gameabout.com/krum3/4586040>

      하이퍼스레딩은 물리적으로 1개의 CPU를 가상으로 2개의 CPU처럼 작동하게 하는 기술로 파이프라인의 단계수가 많고 각 단계의 길이가 짧을때 유리합니다. 다만 수치해석 처럼 모든 코어의 CPU를 100% 사용중인 장시간 수행 시뮬레이션은 일반적으로 Hyper Threading이 비활성화 된 상태에서 더 잘 수행됩니다. FLOW-3D는 100% CPU 사용률이 일반적이므로 새 하드웨어를 구성할 때 Hyper Threading을 비활성화하는 것이 좋습니다. 설정은 시스템의 BIOS 설정에서 수행합니다.

      몇 가지 워크로드의 경우에는 Hyper Threading을 사용하여 약간 더 나은 성능을 보이는 경우가 있습니다. 따라서, 최상의 런타임을 위해서는 두 가지 구성중에서 어느 구성이 더 적합한지 시뮬레이션 유형을 테스트하는 것이 좋습니다.

      스케일링

      여러 코어를 사용할 때 성능은 선형적이지 않습니다. 예를 들어 12 코어 CPU에서 24 코어 CPU로 업그레이드해도 시뮬레이션 런타임이 절반으로 줄어들지 않습니다. 시뮬레이션 유형에 따라 16~32개 이상의 CPU 코어를 선택할 때는 FLOW-3D 및 FLOW-3D CAST의 HPC 버전을 사용하거나 FLOW-3D CLOUD로 이동하는 것을 고려하여야 합니다.

      AMD Ryzen 또는 Epyc CPU

      AMD는 일부 CPU로 벤치마크 차트를 석권하고 있으며 그 가격은 매우 경쟁력이 있습니다. FLOW SCIENCE, INC. 에서는 소수의 AMD CPU로 FLOW-3D를 테스트했습니다. 현재 Epyc CPU는 이상적이지 않고 Ryzen은 성능이 상당히 우수합니다. 발열은 여전히 신중하게 다뤄져야 할 문제입니다. 현재 32 코어 옵션에 영향을 주는 Windows 버그가 초기 버전에서 성능을 크게 저하시키는 것으로 알려져 있습니다. Bug Fix가 되었는지 업데이트 하여 확인하고, 해결되지 않은 경우 이러한 CPU에는 Linux를 권장됩니다.

      <관련 기사>

      https://www.techspot.com/news/78122-report-software-fix-can-double-threadripper-2990wx-performance.html

      Graphics 고려 사항

      FLOW-3D는 OpenGL 드라이버가 만족스럽게 수행되는 최신 그래픽 카드가 필요합니다. 최소한 OpenGL 3.0을 지원하는 것이 좋습니다. FlowSight는 DirectX 11 이상을 지원하는 그래픽 카드에서 가장 잘 작동합니다. 권장 옵션은 엔비디아의 쿼드로 K 시리즈와 AMD의 파이어 프로 W 시리즈입니다.

      특히 엔비디아 쿼드로(NVIDIA Quadro)는 엔비디아가 개발한 전문가 용도(워크스테이션)의 그래픽 카드입니다. 일반적으로 지포스 그래픽 카드가 게이밍에 초점이 맞춰져 있지만, 쿼드로는 다양한 산업 분야의 전문가가 필요로 하는 영역에 광범위한 용도로 사용되고 있습니다. 주로 산업계의 그래픽 디자인 분야, 영상 콘텐츠 제작 분야, 엔지니어링 설계 분야, 과학 분야, 의료 분석 분야 등의 전문가 작업용으로 사용되고 있습니다. 따라서 일반적인 소비자를 대상으로 하는 지포스 그래픽 카드와는 다르계 산업계에 포커스 되어 있으며 가격이 매우 비싸서 도입시 예산을 고려해야 합니다.

      유의할 점은 엔비디아의 GTX 게이밍 하드웨어는 볼륨 렌더링의 속도가 느리거나 오동작 등 몇 가지 제한 사항이 있습니다. 일반적으로 노트북에 내장된 통합 그래픽 카드보다는 개별 그래픽 카드를 강력하게 추천합니다. 최소한 그래픽 메모리는 512MB 이상을 권장합니다.

      PassMark - G3D Mark High End Videocards 2022
      PassMark – G3D Mark High End Videocards 2022

      출처 : https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

      원격데스크탑 사용시 고려 사항

      Flow Science는 nVidia 드라이버 버전이 341.05 이상인 nVidia Quadro K, M 또는 P 시리즈 그래픽 하드웨어를 권장합니다. 이 카드와 드라이버 조합을 사용하면 원격 데스크톱 연결이 완전한 3D 가속 기능을 갖춘 기본 하드웨어에서 자동으로 실행됩니다.

      원격 데스크톱 세션에 연결할 때 nVidia Quadro 그래픽 카드가 설치되어 있지 않으면 Windows는 소프트웨어 렌더링을 사용합니다. 이는 FLOW-3D 및 FlowSight 모두 성능에 부정적인 영향을 미칩니다. FLOW-3D 가 소프트웨어 렌더링을 사용하고 있는지 확인하려면 FLOW-3D 도움말 메뉴에서 정보를 선택하십시오. GDI Generic을 소프트웨어 렌더링으로 사용하는 경우 GL_RENDERER 항목에 표시됩니다.

      하드웨어 렌더링을 활성화하는 몇 가지 옵션이 있습니다. 쉬운 방법 중 하나는 실제 콘솔에서 FLOW-3D를 시작한 다음 원격 데스크톱 세션을 연결하는 것입니다. Nice Software DCV 와 같은 일부 VNC 소프트웨어는 기본적으로 하드웨어 렌더링을 사용합니다.

      RAM 고려 사항

      프로세서 코어당 최소 4GB의 RAM은 FLOW-3D의 좋은 출발입니다. FlowSight POST Processor를 사용하여 후처리 작업을 할 경우 상당한 양의 RAM을 사용하는 것이 좋습니다.

      현재 주력제품인 DDR4보다 2배 빠른 DDR5가 곧 출시된다는 소식도 있습니다.

      일반적으로 FLOW-3D를 이용하여 해석을 할 경우 격자(Mesh)수에 따라 소요되는 적정 메모리 크기는 아래와 같습니다.페이지 보기

      • 초대형 (2억개 이상의 셀) : 최소 128GB
      • 대형 (60 ~ 1억 5천만 셀) : 64 ~ 128GB
      • 중간 (30-60백만 셀) : 32-64GB
      • 작음 (3 천만 셀 이하) : 최소 32GB

      HDD 고려 사항

      수치해석은 해석결과 파일의 데이터 양이 매우 크기 때문에 읽고 쓰는데, 속도면에서 매우 빠른 SSD를 적용하면 성능면에서 큰 도움이 됩니다. 다만 SSD 가격이 비싸서 가성비 측면을 고려하여 적정수준에서 결정이 필요합니다.

      CPU와 저장장치 간 데이터가 오고 가는 통로가 그림과 같이 3가지 방식이 있습니다. 이를 인터페이스라 부르며 SSD는 흔히 PCI-Express 와 SATA 통로를 이용합니다.

      흔히 말하는 NVMe는 PCI-Express3.0 지원 SSD의 경우 SSD에 최적화된 NVMe (NonVolatile Memory Express) 전송 프로토콜을 사용합니다. 주의할 점은 MVMe중에서 SATA3 방식도 있기 때문에 잘 구별하여 구입하시기 바랍니다.

      그리고 SSD를 선택할 경우에도 SSD 종류 중에서 PCI Express 타입은 매우 빠르고 가격이 고가였지만 최근에는 많이 저렴해졌습니다. 따라서 예산 범위내에서 NVMe SSD등 가장 효과적인 선택을 하는 것이 좋습니다.
      ( 참고 : 해석용 컴퓨터 SSD 고르기 참조 )

      기존의 물리적인 하드 디스크의 경우, 디스크에 기록된 데이터를 읽기 위해서는 데이터를 읽어내는 헤드(바늘)가 물리적으로 데이터가 기록된 위치까지 이동해야 하므로 이동에 일정한 시간이 소요됩니다. (이러한 시간을 지연시간, 혹은 레이턴시 등으로 부름) 따라서 하드 디스크의 경우 데이터를 읽기 위한 요청이 주어진 뒤에 데이터를 실제로 읽기까지 일정한 시간이 소요되는데, 이 시간을 일정한 한계(약 10ms)이하로 줄이는 것이 불가능에 가까우며, 데이터가 플래터에 실제 기록된 위치에 따라서 이러한 데이터에의 접근시간 역시 차이가 나게 됩니다.

      하지만 HDD의 최대 강점은 가격대비 용량입니다. 현재 상용화되어 판매하는 대용량 HDD는 12TB ~ 15TB가 공급되고 있으며, 이는 데이터 저장이나 백업용으로 가장 좋은 선택이 됩니다.
      결론적으로 데이터를 직접 읽고 쓰는 드라이브는 SSD를 사용하고 보관하는 용도의 드라이브는 기존의 HDD를 사용하는 방법이 효과적인 선택이 될 수 있습니다.

      PassMark – Disk Rating High End Drives

      PassMark - Disk Rating High End Drives 2022
      PassMark – Disk Rating High End Drives 2022

      출처 : https://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/high_end_drives.html

      상기 벤치마크 테스트는 테스트 조건에 따라 그 성능 곡선이 달라질 수 있기 때문에 조건을 확인할 필요가 있습니다. 예를 들어 Windows7, windows8, windows10 모두에서 테스트한 결과를 평균한 점수와 자신이 사용할 컴퓨터 O/S에서 테스트한 결과는 다를 수 있습니다. 상기 결과에 대한 테스트 환경에 대한 내용은 아래 사이트를 참고하시기 바랍니다.

      참고 : 테스트 환경

      페이지 보기

      Dissipating Culvert End Design for Erosion Control Using CFD Platform FLOW-3D Numerical Simulation Modeling

      CFD 플랫폼 FLOW-3D 수치 시뮬레이션 모델링을 사용한 침식 제어를 위한 분산 암거 종단 설계

      Dissipating Culvert End Design for Erosion Control Using CFD Platform FLOW-3D Numerical Simulation Modeling

      Saman Mostafazadeh-Fard

      Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State Univ., P.O. Box 30001, MSC 3CE, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001 (corresponding author). Email: samanmzf@nmsu.edu

      Zohrab Samani

      Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State Univ., P.O. Box 30001, MSC 3CE, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001. Email: zsamani@nmsu.edu

      Abstract

      추상적인
      암거 끝에서 나오는 고속 흐름으로 인한 하류 침식 및 세굴은 수력 엔지니어가 직면한 주요 문제 중 하나입니다. 본 논문의 주요 목적은 일반적인 암거 단부에서 나오는 고속 흐름으로 인한 하류 침식 및 세굴의 위험을 줄일 수 있는 분산 암거 단부 설계를 개발하는 것이었습니다. 이를 위해 전산 유체 역학(CFD) 플랫폼 FLOW-3D 버전 11.1.0 코드를 실험 실행[결정 계수 R2>0.90 및 평균 제곱근 오차(RMSE)<1.9 cm]을 기반으로 보정 및 검증했습니다. 그런 다음 코드를 사용하여 두 가지 대안적인 소멸 암거 끝 설계(ALT 1 및 ALT 2)를 개발하고 하류 침식 및 세굴 완화 가능성을 분석했습니다. 각각의 출수유속과 운동에너지를 측정하여 전형적인 암거단부(대조)유량과 비교하였다. 결과에 따르면 제어 흐름에서의 질량 평균 유체 평균 운동 에너지는 1.37 j/kg2로 기록되었으며, ALT 1 및 ALT 2 흐름에서 각각 0.83 및 0.73 j/kg2로 측정되었습니다. 따라서 제어 흐름 하에서 하류 샌드박스 매스의 제거는 ALT 1 및 ALT 2 흐름에 비해 각각 약 11.1% 및 4.2% 더 높았습니다. FLOW-3D 코드는 암거 끝 흐름과 하류 침식을 예측하고 하류 침식을 줄일 수 있는 잠재적 소산 암거 끝을 설계하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다.

      Downstream erosion and scouring caused by high-velocity flow issuing from culvert ends are one of the main problems faced by hydraulic engineers. The main objective of this paper was to develop a dissipating culvert end design that can reduce the risk of downstream erosion and scour caused by high-velocity flow issuing from typical culvert ends. For this purpose, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) platform FLOW-3D version 11.1.0 code was calibrated and validated based on the experimental runs [coefficient of determination R2>0.90R2>0.90 and root mean square error (RMSE)<1.9  cm(RMSE)<1.9  cm]. Two alternative dissipating culvert end designs (ALT 1 and ALT 2) were then developed using the code, and their potential in mitigation of downstream erosion and scouring was analyzed. The issuing flow velocity and kinetic energy for each were measured and compared with typical culvert end (control) flow. According to the results, mass averaged fluid mean kinetic energy in the control flow was recorded at 1.37  j/kg21.37  j/kg2 and was measured at 0.83 and 0.73  j/kg20.73  j/kg2 in ALT 1 and ALT 2 flows, respectively. Accordingly, the removal of downstream sandbox mass under control flow was approximately 11.1% and 4.2% higher compared with ALT 1 and ALT 2 flows, respectively. FLOW-3D code can be used to predict culvert end flow and downstream erosion and to design potential dissipating culvert ends that can reduce downstream erosion.

      Dissipating Culvert End Design for Erosion Control Using CFD Platform FLOW-3D Numerical Simulation Modeling
      Dissipating Culvert End Design for Erosion Control Using CFD Platform FLOW-3D Numerical Simulation Modeling
      CFD assessment of the wind forces and moments of superstructures through RANS

      RANS를 통한 상부구조물의 풍력 및 모멘트에 대한 CFD 평가

      HiroshiKobayashiaKenichiKumeaHideoOriharabTakuroIkebuchicIchiroAokidRyoYoshidaeHisafumiYoshidabTomohiroRyufYujiAraigKosukeKatagirihSeijiIkedaiShotaYamanakajHideakiAkibayashikShujiMizokamil

      Abstract

      풍동시험 및 회귀식과 더불어 선박의 설계단계에서 상부구조물의 풍력 및 모멘트를 추정하기 위한 방법으로 수치해석이 사용되기 시작하였다. 그러나 상부구조물 주변의 그리드 의존성을 검증하기 위한 구체적인 접근방법은 제시되지 않았으며, 계산조건의 차이가 결과에 미치는 영향의 정도는 아직 체계적으로 규명되지 않았다. 

      따라서 그리드 민감도 분석에 대한 새로운 접근 방식이 수행됩니다. 계산된 결과에 대한 일부 계산 조건의 영향은 JBC(Japan Bulk Carrier) 모델과 함께 overset grid 기술이 있는 사내 솔버를 사용하여 조사되었습니다. 선체와 선루의 그리드 민감도를 별도로 검증하는 방법은 두 가지를 동시에 검증하는 방법과 동일한 결과를 얻을 수 있다. 상부 구조의 그리드 민감도 분석은 선체와 별도로 수행할 수 있습니다. 

      포괄적인 비교 연구에서는 탱크 크기의 막힘 효과가 미미함, 정상 상태 계산이 비정상 계산뿐만 아니라 추정할 수 있음, 벽 함수를 물체 표면에 적용할 수 있음, 입사 흐름의 바람 프로파일의 차이 등 5가지 결과를 보여줍니다. 전단유동의 운동량 적분에 기초한 정규화에 의해 회복될 수 있으며, 1.0×106 그 이상이면 레이놀즈수 효과를 고려할 필요가 없다. 다른 선박 유형에 대한 계산도 수행됩니다. 

      계산 결과는 측정 데이터와 잘 일치하는 반면 회귀식은 측정 데이터와 차이가 있는 경우가 있습니다. 위의 연구는 정상 상태 CFD 해석이 다양한 선박 유형에 대한 풍동에서 선박 모델의 풍력 및 상부 구조 모멘트를 추정하는 데 가능하고 실행 가능함을 보여주었습니다.

      In addition to wind tunnel tests and regression formulae, numerical simulation has begun to be used at the design stage of ships as a method for estimating the wind force and moments of superstructures. However, no specific approach has been proposed to verify the grid dependence around superstructures, and the degree to which differences in computational conditions affect the results has not yet been systematically clarified. Therefore, a new approach to grid sensitivity analysis is carried out. The effect of some computational conditions on the computed result is investigated using an in-house solver with an overset grid technique with a Japan Bulk Carrier(JBC) model. The method that verifies the grid sensitivity of the hull and the superstructures separately can obtain equivalent results to the method of simultaneously verifying both of them. The grid sensitivity analysis of the superstructures can be performed separately from the hull. The comprehensive comparative study reveals five findings: the blockage effect of the tank size is slight, the steady-state computation is capable of estimating as well as unsteady computation, wall function can be applied to object surfaces, a difference of wind profiles of incident flow can be recovered by the normalization based on the momentum integration in a shear flow, and the Reynolds number effect does not need to be considered if it is greater then 1.0×106. The computations for other ship types are also performed. The computed results show good agreement with the measured data, while the regression formula shows differences from the measured data in some cases. The above study has shown that steady-state CFD analysis is capable and viable in estimating the wind forces and moments of superstructures of a ship model in a wind tunnel for various ship types.

      CFD assessment of the wind forces and moments of superstructures through RANS
      CFD assessment of the wind forces and moments of superstructures through RANS

      Keywords

      바람의 힘과 모멘트, CFD 분석, 풍동, 상부구조, 그리드 민감도 분석,

      Wind forces and moments, CFD analysis, Wind tunnel, Superstructures, Grid sensitivity analysis

      Fig. 8. Variation of water surface profile (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.

      Numerical study of the dam-break waves and Favre waves down sloped wet rigid-bed at laboratory scale

      WenjunLiuaBoWangaYakunGuobaState Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinabFaculty of Engineering & Informatics, University of Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK

      Highlights

      경사진 습윤층에서 댐파괴유동과 FFavre 파를 수치적으로 조사하였다.
      수직 대 수평 속도의 비율이 먼저 정량화됩니다.
      유동 상태는 유상 경사가 큰 후기 단계에서 크게 변경됩니다.
      Favre 파도는 수직 속도와 수직 가속도에 큰 영향을 미칩니다.
      베드 전단응력의 변화는 베드 기울기와 꼬리물의 영향을 받습니다.

      Abstract

      The bed slope and the tailwater depth are two important ones among the factors that affect the propagation of the dam-break flood and Favre waves. Most previous studies have only focused on the macroscopic characteristics of the dam-break flows or Favre waves under the condition of horizontal bed, rather than the internal movement characteristics in sloped channel. The present study applies two numerical models, namely, large eddy simulation (LES) and shallow water equations (SWEs) models embedded in the CFD software package FLOW-3D to analyze the internal movement characteristics of the dam-break flows and Favre waves, such as water level, the velocity distribution, the fluid particles acceleration and the bed shear stress, under the different bed slopes and water depth ratios. The results under the conditions considered in this study show that there is a flow state transition in the flow evolution for the steep bed slope even in water depth ratio α = 0.1 (α is the ratio of the tailwater depth to the reservoir water depth). The flow state transition shows that the wavefront changes from a breaking state to undular. Such flow transition is not observed for the horizontal slope and mild bed slope. The existence of the Favre waves leads to a significant increase of the vertical velocity and the vertical acceleration. In this situation, the SWEs model has poor prediction. Analysis reveals that the variation of the maximum bed shear stress is affected by both the bed slope and tailwater depth. Under the same bed slope (e.g., S0 = 0.02), the maximum bed shear stress position develops downstream of the dam when α = 0.1, while it develops towards the end of the reservoir when α = 0.7. For the same water depth ratio (e.g., α = 0.7), the maximum bed shear stress position always locates within the reservoir at S0 = 0.02, while it appears in the downstream of the dam for S0 = 0 and 0.003 after the flow evolves for a while. The comparison between the numerical simulation and experimental measurements shows that the LES model can predict the internal movement characteristics with satisfactory accuracy. This study improves the understanding of the effect of both the bed slope and the tailwater depth on the internal movement characteristics of the dam-break flows and Favre waves, which also provides a valuable reference for determining the flood embankment height and designing the channel bed anti-scouring facility.

      Fig. 1. Sketch of related variables involved in shallow water model.
      Fig. 1. Sketch of related variables involved in shallow water model.
      Fig. 2. Flume model in numerical simulation.
      Fig. 2. Flume model in numerical simulation.
      Fig. 3. Grid sensitivity analysis (a) water surface profile; (b) velocity profile.
      Fig. 3. Grid sensitivity analysis (a) water surface profile; (b) velocity profile.
      Fig. 4. Sketch of experimental set-up for validating the velocity profile.
      Fig. 4. Sketch of experimental set-up for validating the velocity profile.
      Fig. 5. Sketch of experimental set-up for validating the bed shear stress.
      Fig. 5. Sketch of experimental set-up for validating the bed shear stress.
      Fig. 6. Model validation results (a) variation of the velocity profile; (b) error value of the velocity profile; (c) variation of the bed shear stress; (d) error value of the bed shear stress.
      Fig. 6. Model validation results (a) variation of the velocity profile; (b) error value of the velocity profile; (c) variation of the bed shear stress; (d) error value of the bed shear stress.
      Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of regional division.
      Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of regional division.
      Fig. 8. Variation of water surface profile (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 8. Variation of water surface profile (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 8. (continued).
      Fig. 8. (continued).
      Fig. 8. (continued).
      Fig. 8. (continued).
      Fig. 8. (continued).
      Fig. 8. (continued).
      Fig. 9. Froude number for α = 0.1 (a) variation with time; (b) variation with wavefront position.
      Fig. 9. Froude number for α = 0.1 (a) variation with time; (b) variation with wavefront position.
      Fig. 10. Characteristics of velocity distribution (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 10. Characteristics of velocity distribution (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 11. Average proportion of the vertical velocity (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 11. Average proportion of the vertical velocity (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 12. Bed shear stress distribution (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 12. Bed shear stress distribution (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 12. (continued).
      Fig. 12. (continued).
      Fig. 13. Variation of the maximum bed shear stress position with time (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 13. Variation of the maximum bed shear stress position with time (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 14. Time when the maximum bed shear stress appears at different positions (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 14. Time when the maximum bed shear stress appears at different positions (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 15. Movement characteristics of the fluid particles (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 15. Movement characteristics of the fluid particles (a) α = 0.1; (b) α = 0.3; (c) α = 0.5; (d) α = 0.7.
      Fig. 15. (continued).
      Fig. 15. (continued).

      Keywords

      Dam-break flow, Bed slope, Wet bed, Velocity profile, Bed shear stress, Large eddy simulation

      References

      Barnes, M.P., Baldock, T.E. 2006. Bed shear stress measurements in dam break and swash
      flows. Proceedings of International Conference on Civil and Environmental
      Engineering. Hiroshima University, Japan, 28–29 September.
      Biscarini, C., Francesco, S.D., Manciola, P., 2010. CFD modelling approach for dam break
      flow studies. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 14, 705–718. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-
      705-2010.
      Fig. 15. (continued).
      W. Liu et al.
      Journal of Hydrology 602 (2021) 126752
      19
      Bristeau, M.-O., Goutal, N., Sainte-Marie, J., 2011. Numerical simulations of a nonhydrostatic shallow water model. Comput. Fluids. 47 (1), 51–64. https://doi.org/
      10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.02.013.
      Bung, D.B., Hildebrandt, A., Oertel, M., Schlenkhoff, A., Schlurmann, T. 2008. Bore
      propagation over a submerged horizontal plate by physical and numerical
      simulation. Proc. 31st Intl.Conf. Coastal Eng., Hamburg, Germany, 3542–3553.
      Cantero-Chinchilla, F.N., Castro-Orgaz, O., Dey, S., Ayuso, J.L., 2016. Nonhydrostatic
      dam break flows. I: physical equations and numerical schemes. J. Hydraul. Eng. 142
      (12), 04016068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001205.
      Castro-Orgaz, O., Chanson, H., 2020. Undular and broken surges in dam-break flows: A
      review of wave breaking strategies in a boussinesq-type framework. Environ. Fluid
      Mech. 154 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-020-09749-3.
      Chang, T.-J., Kao, H.-M., Chang, K.-H., Hsu, M.-H., 2011. Numerical simulation of
      shallow-water dam break flows in open channels using smoothed particle
      hydrodynamics. J. Hydrol. 408 (1-2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
      jhydrol.2011.07.023.
      Chen, H., Xu, W., Deng, J., Xue, Y., Li, J., 2009. Experimental investigation of pressure
      load exerted on a downstream dam by dam-break flow. J. Hydraul. Eng. 140,
      199–207. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000743.
      Favre H. 1935. Etude th´eorique et exp´erimentale des ondes de translation dans les
      canaux d´ecouverts. Dunod, Paris. (in French).
      Flow Science Inc. 2016. Flow-3D User’s Manuals. Santa Fe NM.
      Fraccarollo, L., Toro, E.F., 1995. Experimental and numerical assessment of the shallow
      water model for two-dimensional dam-break type problems. J. Hydraul. Res. 33 (6),
      843–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689509498555.
      Guo, Y., Wu, X., Pan, C., Zhang, J., 2012. Numerical simulation of the tidal flow and
      suspended sediment transport in the qiantang estuary. J Waterw. Port Coastal. 138
      (3), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000118.
      Guo, Y., Zhang, Z., Shi, B., 2014. Numerical simulation of gravity current descending a
      slope into a linearly stratified environment. J. Hydraulic Eng. 140 (12), 04014061.
      https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000936.
      Khosronejad, A., Kang, S., Flora, K., 2019. Fully coupled free-surface flow and sediment
      transport modelling of flash floods in a desert stream in the mojave desert, california.
      Hydrol. Process 33 (21), 2772–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.v33.2110.1002/
      hyp.13527.
      Khosronejad, A., Arabi, M.G., Angelidis, D., Bagherizadeh, E., Flora, K., Farhadzadeh, A.,
      2020a. A comparative study of rigid-lid and level-set methods for LES of openchannel flows: morphodynamics. Environ. Fluid Mech. 20 (1), 145–164. https://doi.
      org/10.1007/s10652-019-09703-y.
      Khosronejad, A., Flora, K., Zhang, Z.X., Kang, S., 2020b. Large-eddy simulation of flash
      flood propagation and sediment transport in a dry-bed desert stream. Int. J.
      Sediment Res. 35 (6), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.02.002.
      Khoshkonesh, A., Nsom, B., Gohari, S., Banejad, H., 2019. A comprehensive study of dam
      break over the dry and wet beds. Ocean Eng. 188, 106279.1–106279.18. https://doi.
      org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106279.
      Kocaman, S., Ozmen-Cagatay, H., 2012. The effect of lateral channel contraction on dam
      break flows: laboratory experiment. J. Hydrol. 432–433, 145–153. https://doi.org/
      10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.035.
      Kocaman, S., Ozmen-Cagatay, H., 2015. Investigation of dam-break induced shock waves
      impact on a vertical wall. J. Hydrol. 525, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
      jhydrol.2015.03.040.
      LaRocque, L.A., Imran, J., Chaudhry, M.H., 2013a. Experimental and numerical
      investigations of two-dimensional dam-break flows. J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (6),
      569–579. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000705.
      Larocque, L.A., Imran, J., Chaudhry, M.H., 2013b. 3D numerical simulation of partial
      breach dam-break flow using the LES and k-ε turbulence models. J. Hydraul. Res. 51,
      145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.734862.
      Lauber, G., Hager, W.H., 1998a. Experiments to dam break wave: Horizontal channel.
      J. Hydraul. Res. 36 (3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498620.
      Lauber, G., Hager, W.H., 1998b. Experiments to dam break wave: Sloping channel.
      J. Hydraul. Res. 36 (5), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498601.
      Leal, J.G., Ferreira, R.M., Cardoso, A.H., 2006. Dam-break wave-front celerity.
      J. Hydraul. Eng. 132 (1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)
      132:1(69).
      Liu, W., Wang, B., Guo, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., 2020. Experimental investigation on the
      effects of bed slope and tailwater on dam-break flows. J. Hydrol. 590, 125256.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125256.
      Marche, C., Beauchemin P. EL Kayloubi, A. 1995. Etude num´erique et exp´erimentale des
      ondes secondaires de Favre cons´ecutives a la rupture d’un harrage. Can. J. Civil Eng.
      22, 793–801, (in French). https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-089.
      Marra, D., Earl, T., Ancey, C. 2011. Experimental investigations of dam break flows down
      an inclined channel. Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International
      Association for Hydro-Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and
      Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water
      Engineering, Brisbane, Australia.
      Marsooli, R., Wu, W., 2014. 3-D finite-volume model of dam-break flow over uneven
      beds based on vof method. Adv. Water Resour. 70, 104–117. https://doi.org/
      10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.04.020.
      Miller, S., Chaudhry, M.H., 1989. Dam-break flows in curved channel. J. Hydraul. Eng.
      115 (11), 1465–1478. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:11
      (1465).
      Mohapatra, P.K., Chaudhry, M.H., 2004. Numerical solution of Boussinesq equations to
      simulate dam-break flows. J. Hydraul. Eng. 130 (2), 156–159. https://doi.org/
      10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:2(156).
      Oertel, M., Bung, D.B., 2012. Initial stage of two-dimensional dam-break waves:
      laboratory versus VOF. J. Hydraul. Res. 50 (1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/
      00221686.2011.639981.
      Ozmen-Cagatay, H., Kocaman, S., 2012. Investigation of dam-break flow over abruptly
      contracting channel with trapezoidal-shaped lateral obstacles. J. Fluids Eng. 134,
      081204 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007154.
      Ozmen-Cagatay, H., Kocaman, S., Guzel, H., 2014. Investigation of dam-break flood
      waves in a dry channel with a hump. J. Hydro-environ. Res. 8 (3), 304–315. https://
      doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2014.01.005.
      Park, I.R., Kim, K.S., Kim, J., Van, S.H., 2012. Numerical investigation of the effects of
      turbulence intensity on dam-break flows. Ocean Eng. 42, 176–187. https://doi.org/
      10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.01.005.
      Peregrine, D.H., 1966. Calculations of the development of an undular bore. J. Fluid
      Mech. 25 (2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112066001678.
      Savic, L.j., Holly, F.M., 1993. Dam break flood waves computed by modified Godunov
      method. J. Hydraul. Res. 31 (2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/
      00221689309498844.
      Shigematsu, T., Liu, P., Oda, K., 2004. Numerical modeling of the initial stages of dambreak waves. J. Hydraul. Res. 42 (2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/
      00221686.2004.9628303.
      Smagorinsky, J., 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations.
      Part I: the basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99–164. https://doi.org/
      10.1126/science.27.693.594.
      Soares-Frazao, S., Zech, Y., 2002. Undular bores and secondary waves – Experiments and
      hybrid finite-volume modeling. J. Hydraul. Res. 40, 33–43. https://doi.org/
      10.1080/00221680209499871.
      Stansby, P.K., Chegini, A., Barnes, T.C.D., 1998. The initial stages of dam-break flow.
      J. Fluid Mech. 370, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/022112098001918.
      Treske, A., 1994. Undular bores (favre-waves) in open channels – experimental studies.
      J. Hydraul. Res. 32 (3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689409498738.
      Wang, B., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Dong, J., Ma, X., Song, J., 2016. A semi-analytical approach
      for predicting peak discharge of floods caused by embankment dam failures. Hydrol.
      Process 30 (20), 3682–3691. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.v30.2010.1002/
      hyp.10896.
      Wang, B., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Peng, Y., Ma, X., Song, J., 2017. Analytical solution of dambreak flood wave propagation in a dry sloped channel with an irregular-shaped
      cross-section. J. Hydro-environ. Res. 14, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
      jher.2016.11.003.
      Wang, B., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Peng, Y., Song, J., Liu, W., Liu, X., 2018. Empirical and semianalytical models for predicting peak outflows caused by embankment dam failures.
      J. Hydrol. 562, 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.049.
      Wang, B., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Liu, X., Liu, W., 2019. Comparison of measured
      dam-break flood waves in triangular and rectangular channels. J. Hydrol. 575,
      690–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.081.
      Wang, B., Liu, W., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Peng, Y., Wu, Z., Liu, X., Yang, S., 2020a.
      Enhancement of semi-theoretical models for predicting peak discharges in breached
      embankment dams. Environ. Fluid Mech. 20 (4), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/
      s10652-019-09730-9.
      Wang, B., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Zhang, J., Guo, Y., 2020b. Analytical solution of shallow
      water equations for ideal dam-break flood along a wet bed slope. J. Hydraul. Eng.
      146 (2), 06019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001683.
      Wang, B., Liu, W., Wang, W., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Liu, X., Yang, S., 2020c.
      Experimental and numerical investigations of similarity for dam-break flows on wet
      bed. J. Hydrol. 583, 124598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124598.
      Wang, B., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Guo, Y., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Liu, W., Yang, S., Zhang, F.,
      2020d. Analytical and experimental investigations of dam-break flows in triangular
      channels with wet-bed conditions. J. Hydraul. Eng. 146 (10), 04020070. https://doi.
      org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001808.
      Wu, W., Wang, S., 2007. One-dimensional modeling of dam-break flow over movable
      beds. J. Hydraul. Eng. 133 (1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429
      (2007)133:1(48).
      Xia, J., Lin, B., Falconer, R.A., Wang, G., 2010. Modelling dam-break flows over mobile
      beds using a 2d coupled approach. Adv. Water Resour. 33 (2), 171–183. https://doi.
      org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.11.004.
      Yang, S., Yang, W., Qin, S., Li, Q., Yang, B., 2018a. Numerical study on characteristics of
      dam-break wave. Ocean Eng. 159, 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
      oceaneng.2018.04.011.
      Yang, S., Yang, W., Qin, S., Li, Q., 2018b. Comparative study on calculation methods of
      dam-break wave. J. Hydraul. Res. 57 (5), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/
      00221686.2018.1494057.

      Figure 3. Comparison of water surface profiles over porous media with 12 mm particle diameter in laboratory measurements (symbols) and numerical results (lines).

      다공층에 대한 돌발 댐 붕괴의 3차원 유동 수치해석 시뮬레이션

      A. Safarzadeh1*, P. Mohsenzadeh2, S. Abbasi3
      1 Professor of Civil Eng., Water Engineering and Mineral Waters Research Center, Univ. of Mohaghegh Ardabili,Ardabil, Iran
      2 M.Sc., Graduated of Civil-Hydraulic Structures Eng., Faculty of Eng., Univ. of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
      3 M.Sc., Graduated of Civil -Hydraulic Structures Eng., Faculty of Eng., Univ. of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran Safarzadeh@uma.ac.ir

      Highlights

      유체 이동에 의해 생성된 RBF는 Ls-Dyna에서 Fluent, ICFD ALE 및 SPH 방법으로 시뮬레이션되었습니다.
      RBF의 과예측은 유체가 메인 도메인에서 고속으로 분리될 때 발생합니다.
      이 과잉 예측은 요소 크기, 시간 단계 크기 및 유체 모델에 따라 다릅니다.
      유체 성능을 검증하려면 최대 RBF보다 임펄스가 권장됩니다.

      Abstract

      Dam break is a very important problem due to its effects on economy, security, human casualties and environmental consequences. In this study, 3D flow due to dam break over the porous substrate is numerically simulated and the effect of porosity, permeability and thickness of the porous bed and the water depth in the porous substrate are investigated. Classic models of dam break over a rigid bed and water infiltration through porous media were studied and results of the numerical simulations are compared with existing laboratory data. Validation of the results is performed by comparing the water surface profiles and wave front position with dam break on rigid and porous bed. Results showed that, due to the effect of dynamic wave in the initial stage of dam break, a local peak occurs in the flood hydrograph. The presence of porous bed reduces the acceleration of the flood wave relative to the flow over the solid bed and it decreases with the increase of the permeability of the bed. By increasing the permeability of the bed, the slope of the ascending limb of the flood hydrograph and the peak discharge drops. Furthermore, if the depth and permeability of the bed is such that the intrusive flow reaches the rigid substrate under the porous bed, saturation of the porous bed, results in a sharp increase in the slope of the flood hydrograph. The maximum values of the peak discharge at the end of the channel with porous bed occurred in saturated porous bed conditions.

      댐 붕괴는 경제, 보안, 인명 피해 및 환경적 영향으로 인해 매우 중요한 문제입니다. 본 연구에서는 다공성 기재에 대한 댐 파괴로 인한 3차원 유동을 수치적으로 시뮬레이션하고 다공성 기재의 다공성, 투과도 및 다공성 층의 두께 및 수심의 영향을 조사합니다. 단단한 바닥에 대한 댐 파괴 및 다공성 매체를 통한 물 침투의 고전 모델을 연구하고 수치 시뮬레이션 결과를 기존 실험실 데이터와 비교합니다. 결과 검증은 강체 및 다공성 베드에서 댐 파단과 수면 프로파일 및 파면 위치를 비교하여 수행됩니다. 그 결과 댐파괴 초기의 동적파동의 영향으로 홍수수문곡선에서 국부첨두가 발생하는 것으로 나타났다. 다공성 베드의 존재는 고체 베드 위의 유동에 대한 홍수파의 가속을 감소시키고 베드의 투과성이 증가함에 따라 감소합니다. 베드의 투수성을 증가시켜 홍수 수문곡선의 오름차순 경사와 첨두방류량이 감소한다. 더욱이, 만약 층의 깊이와 투과성이 관입 유동이 다공성 층 아래의 단단한 기질에 도달하는 정도라면, 다공성 층의 포화는 홍수 수문곡선의 기울기의 급격한 증가를 초래합니다. 다공층이 있는 채널의 끝단에서 최대 방전 피크값은 포화 다공층 조건에서 발생하였다.

      Keywords

      Keywords: Dams Break, 3D modeling, Porous Bed, Permeability, Flood wave

      Reference

      [1] D.L. Fread, In: Maidment, D.R. (Ed.), Flow Routing in Handbook of Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, USA, pp. 10(1) (1993) 1-36.
      [2] M. Morris, CADAM: Concerted Action on Dambreak Modeling – Final Report, Rep. SR 571. HR Wallingford, 2000.
      [3] H. Chanson, The Hydraulics of Open Channel Flows: an Introduction, ButterworthHeinemann, Oxford, 2004.
      [4] A. Ritter, Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen (The Propagation of Water Waves), Zeitschrift Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 36 (33) (1892) 947–954 [in German].
      [5] B. Ghimire, Hydraulic Analysis of Free-Surface Flows into Highly Permeable Porous Media and its Applications, Phd. Thesis, Kyoto University, 2009.
      [6] R. Dressler, Hydraulic Resistance Effect Upon the Dam-Break Function, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 49 (3) 1952.
      [7] G. Lauber, and W.H. Hager, Experiments to Dambreak Wave: horizontal channel, Journal of Hydraulic Research. 36 (3) (1998) 291–307.
      [8] L.W. Tan, and V.H. Chu, Lagrangian Block Hydrodynamics of Macro Resistance in a River-Flow Model,
      [9] L. Tan, V.H. Lauber and Hager’s Dam-Break Wave Data for Numerical Model Validation, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 47 (4) (2009) 524-528.
      [10] S. Mambretti, E.D. Larcan, and D. Wrachien, 1D Modelling of Dam-Break Surges with Floating Debris, J. of Biosystems engineering, 100 (2) (2008) 297-308.
      [11] M. Pilotti, M. Tomirotti, G. Valerio, and B. Bacchi, Simplified Method for the Characterization of the Hydrograph Following a Sudden Partial Dam Break, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136 (10) (2010) 693-704.
      [12] T.J. Chang, H.M. Kao, K.H. Chang, and Mi.H. Hsu, Numerical Simulation of ShallowWater Dam Break Flows in Open Channels Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, J. Hydraul. Eng., 408 (78–90) 2011.
      [13] T. Tawatchai, and W. Rattanapitikon, 2-D Modelling of Dambreak Wave Propagation on Initially Dry Bed, Thammasat Int. J. Sc. 4 (3) 1999.
      [14] Y.F. Le, Experimental Study of landslide Dam-Break Flood over Erodible Bed in open Channels. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 21 (5) 2006.
      [15] O. Castro-Orgaz, & H. Chanson, Ritter’s Dry-Bed Dam-Break Flows: Positive and Negative Wave Dynamics, J. of Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 17 (4) (2017) 665-694.
      [16] A. Jozdani, A.R. Kabiri-Samani, Application of Image Processing Method to Analysis of Flood Behavior Due to Dam Break, 9th Iranian Hydraulic Conference. Univ. of Tarbiat Moddares, 2011.(in persian)
      [17] A. Safarzadeh, Three Dimensional Hydrodynamics of Sudden Dam Break in Curved Channels, Journal of Modares Civil Engineering, 17(3) (2017) 77-86. (in persian)
      [18] P. C. Carman, Fluid Flow Through Granular Beds, Transactions, Institution of Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 75 (Dec): S32–S48, London, 15, (1937) 150-166.
      [19] P. Forchheimer, Wasserbewegung Durch Boden. Z. Ver. Deutsch. Ing. 45 (1901) 1782– 1788.
      [20] S. Ergun, Fluid Flow through Packed Columns. Chemical Engineering Progress, 48(2) (1952) 89-93.
      [21] A. Parsaei, S. Dehdar-Behbahani, Numerical Modeling of Cavitation on Spillway’s Flip Bucket, Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 10 (4) (2016) 438-444.
      [22] S. Dehdar-Behbahani, A. Parsaei, Numerical Modeling of Flow Pattern in Dam Spillway’s Guide Wall. Case study: Balaroud dam, Iran, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(1) (2016) 467-473.
      [23] A. Parsaei, AH. Haghiabi, A. Moradnejad, CFD Modeling of Flow Pattern in Spillway’s ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 19 Approach Channel, Sustainable Water Resources Management, 1(3) (2015) 245-251.
      [24] SH. Najafian, H. Yonesi, A. Parsaei, PH. Torabi, Physical and Numerical Modeling of Flow in Heterogeneous Roughness Non-Prismatic Compound Open Channel, Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research, 17(66) (2016) 87-104.
      [25] SH. Najafian, H. Yonesi, A. Parsaei, PH. Torabi, Physical and Numerical Modeling of Flow Properties in Prismatic Compound Open Channel with Heterogeneous Roughness, Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research, 18(68) (2017) 1-16.
      [26] A. Safarzadeh, S.H. Mohajeri, Hydrodynamics of Rectangular Broad-Crested Porous Weirs, Journal of Irrig. & Drain. Eng., 144(10) (2018) 1-12.
      [27] M. Fathi-moghaddam, M.T. Sadrabadi, M, Rahamnshahi, Numerical Simulation of the Hydraulic Performance of Triangular and Trapezoidal Gabion Weirs in Free Flow Condition, Journal of Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 62 (2018) 93-104.
      [28] A. Parsaei, A. Moradnejad, Numerical Modeling of Flow Pattern in Spillway Approach Channel, Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(1) (2018) 1-9.

      Flow Field in a Sloped Channel with Damaged and Undamaged Piers: Numerical and Experimental Studies

      Flow Field in a Sloped Channel with Damaged and Undamaged Piers: Numerical and Experimental Studies

      Ehsan OveiciOmid Tayari & Navid Jalalkamali
      KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering volume 25, pages4240–4251 (2021)Cite this article

      Abstract

      본 논문은 경사가 완만한 수로에서 손상되거나 손상되지 않은 교각 주변의 유동 패턴을 분석했습니다. 실험은 길이가 12m이고 기울기가 0.008인 직선 수로에서 수행되었습니다. Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter(ADV)를 이용하여 3차원 유속 데이터를 수집하였고, 그 결과를 PIV(Particle Image Velocimetry) 데이터와 분석하여 비교하였습니다.

      다중 블록 옵션이 있는 취수구의 퇴적물 시뮬레이션(SSIIM)은 이 연구에서 흐름의 수치 시뮬레이션을 위해 통합되었습니다. 일반적으로 비교에서 얻은 결과는 수치 데이터와 실험 데이터 간의 적절한 일치를 나타냅니다. 결과는 모든 경우에 수로 입구에서 2m 거리에서 기복적 수압 점프가 발생했음을 보여주었습니다.

      경사진 수로의 최대 베드 전단응력은 2개의 손상 및 손상되지 않은 교각을 설치하기 위한 수평 수로의 12배였습니다. 이와 같은 경사수로 교각의 위치에 따라 상류측 수위는 수평수로의 유사한 조건에 비해 72.5% 감소한 반면, 이 감소량은 경사면에서 다른 경우에 비해 8.3% 감소하였다. 채널 또한 두 교각이 있는 경우 최대 Froude 수는 수평 수로의 5.7배였습니다.

      This paper analyzed the flow pattern around damaged and undamaged bridge piers in a channel with a mild slope. The experiments were carried out on a straight channel with a length of 12 meters and a slope of 0.008. Acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) was employed to collect three-dimensional flow velocity data, and the results were analyzed and compared with particle image velocimetry (PIV) data. Sediment Simulation in Intakes with Multiblock option (SSIIM) was incorporated for the numerical simulation of the flow in this study. Generally, the results obtained from the comparisons referred to the appropriate agreement between the numerical and the experimental data. The results showed that an undular hydraulic jump occurred at a distance of two meters from the channel entrance in every case; the maximum bed shear stress in the sloped channel was 12 times that in a horizontal channel for installing two damaged and undamaged piers. With this position of the piers in the sloped channel, the upstream water level underwent a 72.5% reduction compared to similar conditions in a horizontal channel, while the amount of this water level decrease was equal to 8.3% compared to the other cases in a sloped channel. In addition, with the presence of both piers, the maximum Froude number was 5.7 times that in a horizontal channel.

      This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

      References

      Download references

      Fig. 1. Model geometry with the computational domain, extrusion nozzle, toolpath, and boundary conditions. The model is presented while printing the fifth layer.

      재료 압출 적층 제조에서 증착된 층의 안정성 및 변형

      Md Tusher Mollah Raphaël 사령관 Marcin P. Serdeczny David B. Pedersen Jon Spangenberg덴마크 공과 대학 기계 공학과, Kgs. 덴마크 링비

      2020년 12월 22일 접수, 2021년 5월 1일 수정, 2021년 7월 15일 수락, 2021년 7월 21일 온라인 사용 가능, 기록 버전 2021년 8월 17일 .

      Abstract

      이 문서는 재료 압출 적층 제조 에서 여러 레이어를 인쇄하는 동안 증착 흐름의 전산 유체 역학 시뮬레이션 을 제공합니다 개발된 모델은 증착된 레이어의 형태를 예측하고 점소성 재료 를 인쇄하는 동안 레이어 변형을 캡처합니다 . 물리학은 일반화된 뉴턴 유체 로 공식화된 Bingham 구성 모델의 연속성 및 운동량 방정식에 의해 제어됩니다. . 증착된 층의 단면 모양이 예측되고 재료의 다양한 구성 매개변수에 대해 층의 변형이 연구됩니다. 층의 변형은 인쇄물의 정수압과 압출시 압출압력으로 인한 것임을 알 수 있다. 시뮬레이션에 따르면 항복 응력이 높을수록 변형이 적은 인쇄물이 생성되는 반면 플라스틱 점도 가 높을수록 증착된 레이어에서변형이 커 집니다 . 또한, 인쇄 속도, 압출 속도 의 영향, 층 높이 및 인쇄된 층의 변형에 대한 노즐 직경을 조사합니다. 마지막으로, 이 모델은 후속 인쇄된 레이어의 정수압 및 압출 압력을 지원하기 위해 증착 후 점소성 재료가 요구하는 항복 응력의 필요한 증가에 대한 보수적인 추정치를 제공합니다.

      This paper presents computational fluid dynamics simulations of the deposition flow during printing of multiple layers in material extrusion additive manufacturing. The developed model predicts the morphology of the deposited layers and captures the layer deformations during the printing of viscoplastic materials. The physics is governed by the continuity and momentum equations with the Bingham constitutive model, formulated as a generalized Newtonian fluid. The cross-sectional shapes of the deposited layers are predicted, and the deformation of layers is studied for different constitutive parameters of the material. It is shown that the deformation of layers is due to the hydrostatic pressure of the printed material, as well as the extrusion pressure during the extrusion. The simulations show that a higher yield stress results in prints with less deformations, while a higher plastic viscosity leads to larger deformations in the deposited layers. Moreover, the influence of the printing speed, extrusion speed, layer height, and nozzle diameter on the deformation of the printed layers is investigated. Finally, the model provides a conservative estimate of the required increase in yield stress that a viscoplastic material demands after deposition in order to support the hydrostatic and extrusion pressure of the subsequently printed layers.

      Fig. 1. Model geometry with the computational domain, extrusion nozzle, toolpath, and boundary conditions. The model is presented while printing the fifth layer.
      Fig. 1. Model geometry with the computational domain, extrusion nozzle, toolpath, and boundary conditions. The model is presented while printing the fifth layer.

      키워드

      점성 플라스틱 재료, 재료 압출 적층 제조(MEX-AM), 다층 증착, 전산유체역학(CFD), 변형 제어
      Viscoplastic Materials, Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing (MEX-AM), Multiple-Layers Deposition, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Deformation Control

      Introduction

      Three-dimensional printing of viscoplastic materials has grown in popularity over the recent years, due to the success of Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing (MEX-AM) [1]. Viscoplastic materials, such as ceramic pastes [2,3], hydrogels [4], thermosets [5], and concrete [6], behave like solids when the applied load is below their yield stress, and like a fluid when the applied load exceeds their yield stress [7]. Viscoplastic materials are typically used in MEX-AM techniques such as Robocasting [8], and 3D concrete printing [9,10]. The differences between these technologies lie in the processing of the material before the extrusion and in the printing scale (from microscale to big area additive manufacturing). In these extrusion-based technologies, the structure is fabricated in a layer-by-layer approach onto a solid surface/support [11, 12]. During the process, the material is typically deposited on top of the previously printed layers that may be already solidified (wet-on-dry printing) or still deformable (wet-on-wet printing) [1]. In wet-on-wet printing, control over the deformation of layers is important for the stability and geometrical accuracy of the prints. If the material is too liquid after the deposition, it cannot support the pressure of the subsequently deposited layers. On the other hand, the material flowability is a necessity during extrusion through the nozzle. Several experimental studies have been performed to analyze the physics of the extrusion and deposition of viscoplastic materials, as reviewed in Refs. [13–16]. The experimental measurements can be supplemented with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to gain a more complete picture of MEX-AM. A review of the CFD studies within the material processing and deposition in 3D concrete printing was presented by Roussel et al. [17]. Wolfs et al. [18] predicted numerically the failure-deformation of a cylindrical structure due to the self-weight by calculating the stiffness and strength of the individual layers. It was found that the deformations can take place in all layers, however the most critical deformation occurs in the bottom layer. Comminal et al. [19,20] presented three-dimensional simulations of the material deposition in MEX-AM, where the fluid was approximated as Newtonian. Subsequently, the model was experimentally validated in Ref. [21] for polymer-based MEX-AM, and extended to simulate the deposition of multiple layers in Ref. [22], where the previously printed material was assumed solid. Xia et al. [23] simulated the influence of the viscoelastic effects on the shape of deposited layers in MEX-AM. A numerical model for simulating the deposition of a viscoplastic material was recently presented and experimentally validated in Refs. [24] and [25]. These studies focused on predicting the cross-sectional shape of a single printed layer for different processing conditions (relative printing speed, and layer height). Despite these research efforts, a limited number of studies have focused on investigating the material deformations in wet-on-wet printing when multiple layers are deposited on top of each other. This paper presents CFD simulations of the extrusion-deposition flow of a viscoplastic material for several subsequent layers (viz. three- and five-layers). The material is continuously printed one layer over another on a fixed solid surface. The rheology of the viscoplastic material is approximated by the Bingham constitutive equation that is formulated using the Generalized Newtonian Fluid (GNF) model. The CFD model is used to predict the cross-sectional shapes of the layers and their deformations while printing the next layers on top. Moreover, the simulations are used to quantify the extrusion pressure applied by the deposited material on the substrate, and the previously printed layers. Numerically, it is investigated how the process parameters (i.e., the extrusion speed, printing speed, nozzle diameter, and layer height) and the material rheology affect the deformations of the deposited layers. Section 2 describes the methodology of the study. Section 3 presents and discusses the results. The study is summarized and concluded in Section 4.

      References

      [1] R.A. Buswell, W.R. Leal De Silva, S.Z. Jones, J. Dirrenberger, 3D printing using
      concrete extrusion: a roadmap for research, Cem. Concr. Res. 112 (2018) 37–49.
      [2] Z. Chen, Z. Li, J. Li, C. Liu, C. Lao, Y. Fu, C. Liu, Y. Li, P. Wang, Y. He, 3D printing of
      ceramics: a review, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 39 (4) (2019) 661–687.
      [3] A. Bellini, L. Shor, S.I. Guceri, New developments in fused deposition modeling of
      ceramics, Rapid Prototyp. J. 11 (4) (2005) 214–220.
      [4] S. Aktas, D.M. Kalyon, B.M. Marín-Santib´
      anez, ˜ J. P´erez-Gonzalez, ´ Shear viscosity
      and wall slip behavior of a viscoplastic hydrogel, J. Rheol. 58 (2) (2014) 513–535.
      [5] J. Lindahl, A. Hassen, S. Romberg, B. Hedger, P. Hedger Jr., M. Walch, T. Deluca,
      W. Morrison, P. Kim, A. Roschli, D. Nuttall, Large-scale Additive Manufacturing
      with Reactive Polymers, Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United
      States), 2018.
      [6] V.N. Nerella, V. Mechtcherine, Studying the printability of fresh concrete for
      formwork-free Concrete onsite 3D Printing Technology (CONPrint3D), 3D Concr.
      Print. Technol. (2019) 333–347.
      [7] C. Tiu, J. Guo, P.H.T. Uhlherr, Yielding behaviour of viscoplastic materials, J. Ind.
      Eng. Chem. 12 (5) (2006) 653–662.
      [8] B. Dietemann, F. Bosna, M. Lorenz, N. Travitzky, H. Kruggel-Emden, T. Kraft,
      C. Bierwisch, Modeling robocasting with smoothed particle hydrodynamics:
      printing gapspanning filaments, Addit. Manuf. 36 (2020), 101488.
      [9] B. Khoshnevis, R. Russell, H. Kwon, S. Bukkapatnam, Contour crafting – a layered
      fabrication, Spec. Issue IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 8 (3) (2001) 33–42.
      [10] D. Asprone, F. Auricchio, C. Menna, V. Mercuri, 3D printing of reinforced concrete
      elements: technology and design approach, Constr. Build. Mater. 165 (2018)
      218–231.
      [11] J. Jiang, Y. Ma, Path planning strategies to optimize accuracy, quality, build time
      and material use in additive manufacturing: a review, Micromachines 11 (7)
      (2020) 633.
      [12] J. Jiang, A novel fabrication strategy for additive manufacturing processes,
      J. Clean. Prod. 272 (2020), 122916.
      [13] F. Bos, R. Wolfs, Z. Ahmed, T. Salet, Additive manufacturing of concrete in
      construction: potentials and challenges, Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 11 (3) (2016)
      209–225.
      [14] P. Wu, J. Wang, X. Wang, A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the
      construction industry, Autom. Constr. 68 (2016) 21–31.
      [15] T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T. Nguyen, D. Hui, Additive manufacturing
      (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges,
      Compos. Part B: Eng. 143 (2018) 172–196.
      [16] M. Valente, A. Sibai, M. Sambucci, Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of
      concrete products: revolutionizing and remodeling the construction industry,
      J. Compos. Sci. 3 (3) (2019) 88.
      [17] N. Roussel, J. Spangenberg, J. Wallevik, R. Wolfs, Numerical simulations of
      concrete processing: from standard formative casting to additive manufacturing,
      Cem. Concr. Res. 135 (2020), 106075.
      [18] R.J.M. Wolfs, F.P. Bos, T.A.M. Salet, Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed
      concrete: numerical modelling and experimental testing, Cem. Concr. Res. 106
      (2018) 103–116.
      [19] R. Comminal, M.P. Serdeczny, D.B. Pedersen, J. Spangenberg, Numerical modeling
      of the strand deposition flow in extrusion-based additive manufacturing, Addit.
      Manuf. 20 (2018) 68–76.
      [20] R. Comminal, M.P. Serdeczny, D.B. Pedersen, J. Spangenberg, Numerical modeling
      of the material deposition and contouring precision in fused deposition modeling,
      in Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication
      Symposium, Austin, TX, USA, 2018, pp. 1855–1864.
      [21] M.P. Serdeczny, R. Comminal, D.B. Pedersen, J. Spangenberg, Experimental
      validation of a numerical model for the strand shape in material extrusion additive
      manufacturing, Addit. Manuf. 24 (2018) 145–153.
      [22] M.P. Serdeczny, R. Comminal, D.B. Pedersen, J. Spangenberg, Numerical
      simulations of the mesostructure formation in material extrusion additive
      manufacturing, Addit. Manuf. 28 (2019) 419–429.
      [23] H. Xia, J. Lu, G. Tryggvason, A numerical study of the effect of viscoelastic stresses
      in fused filament fabrication, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 346 (2019)
      242–259.
      [24] R. Comminal, W.R.L. da Silva, T.J. Andersen, H. Stang, J. Spangenberg, Influence
      of processing parameters on the layer geometry in 3D concrete printing:
      experiments and modelling, in: Proceedings of the Second RILEM International
      Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, vol. 28, 2020, pp. 852–862.
      [25] R. Comminal, W.R.L. da Silva, T.J. Andersen, H. Stang, J. Spangenberg, Modelling
      of 3D concrete printing based on computational fluid dynamics, Cem. Concr. Res.
      38 (2020), 106256.
      [26] E.C. Bingham, An investigation of the laws of plastic flow, US Bur. Stand. Bull. 13
      (1916) 309–352.
      [27] N. Casson, A flow equation for pigment-oil suspensions of the printing ink type,
      Rheol. Disperse Syst. (1959) 84–104.
      [28] W.H. Herschel, R. Bulkley, Konsistenzmessungen von Gummi-Benzollosungen, ¨
      Kolloid Z. 39 (1926) 291–300.
      [29] “FLOW-3D | We solve The World’s Toughest CFD Problems,” FLOW SCIENCE.
      〈https://www.flow3d.com/〉. (Accessed 27 June 2020).
      [30] S. Jacobsen, R. Cepuritis, Y. Peng, M.R. Geiker, J. Spangenberg, Visualizing and
      simulating flow conditions in concrete form filling using pigments, Constr. Build.
      Mater. 49 (2013) 328–342.
      [31] E.J. O’Donovan, R.I. Tanner, Numerical study of the Bingham squeeze film
      problem, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 15 (1) (1984) 75–83.
      [32] C.W. Hirt, B.D. Nichols, Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free
      boundaries, J. Comput. Phys. 39 (1) (1981) 201–225.
      [33] R. Comminal, J. Spangenberg, J.H. Hattel, Cellwise conservative unsplit advection
      for the volume of fluid method, J. Comput. Phys. 283 (2015) 582–608.
      [34] A. Negar, S. Nazarian, N.A. Meisel, J.P. Duarte, Experimental prediction of material
      deformation in large-scale additive manufacturing of concrete, Addit. Manuf. 37
      (2021), 101656.

      Figure 2 | Distribution map of detection points.

      Influence of bridge piers shapes on the flow of the lower Yellow River

      교각 모양이 황하 하류의 흐름에 미치는 영향

      Xianqi Zhanga,b,c, Tao Wanga,* and Xiaobin Lua
      a Water Conservancy College, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
      b Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Protection Engineering, Zhengzhou 450046, China
      c Technology Research Center of Water Conservancy and Marine Traffic Engineering, Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450046, China
      *Corresponding author. E-mail: 1124149584@qq.com

      Abstract

      하천을 가로지르는 교각의 형태는 하천의 역류에 영향을 미치는 중요한 요인 중 하나이다. 교각 형상이 강의 흐름 패턴에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구는 교량 설계 및 하천 범람에 가치가 있습니다. Mike 21 Flow Model 유체역학 모델을 기반으로 동적 수치 시뮬레이션을 수행하여 다양한 형태의 교각이 물 흐름에 미치는 영향을 조사했습니다. 그 결과 직사각형, 원형 ​​및 타원형 교각이 하천에 물 차단 효과가 있음을 보여줍니다. 교각 근처의 지역에서 흐름 패턴이 변경되었습니다. 동일한 유속에서 직사각형 교각의 역류가 가장 컸고 원형 교각이 그 뒤를 이었고 타원형 교각이 가장 작았다. 직사각형 교각으로 인한 역류량 값은 타원형 교각의 1.95배였다. 타원형 교각 교각은 기본적으로 강의 전반적인 흐름 패턴을 변경하지 않으며 하천 체제에 거의 영향을 미치지 않습니다. 하천 교각의 배치에 대한 참조를 제공합니다.

      Key words

      bridge piers shape, flow regime, Mike21 Flow Model, numerical simulation, Yellow River

      Figure 1 | Location of the proposed bridge
      Figure 1 | Location of the proposed bridge
      Figure 2 | Distribution map of detection points.
      Figure 2 | Distribution map of detection points.
      Figure 3 | (a) Elevation contour map of water surface near the rectangular pier in the working condition 1, (b) Elevation contour map of water surface near the round pier in the working condition 1 and (c) Elevation contour map of water surface near the oval pier in the working condition 1.
      Figure 3 | (a) Elevation contour map of water surface near the rectangular pier in the working condition 1, (b) Elevation contour map of water surface near the round pier in the working condition 1 and (c) Elevation contour map of water surface near the oval pier in the working condition 1.
      Figure 9 | Monitoring section backwater changes; (a) Once in ten years traffic, (b) Yearly average flow, (c) Lowest water level (p ¼ 95%)
      Figure 9 | Monitoring section backwater changes; (a) Once in ten years traffic, (b) Yearly average flow, (c) Lowest water level (p ¼ 95%)

      REFERENCES

      Ban, M. N. & Wu, Y. G. 2018 Analysis of flood carrying capacity of Nandu River estuary based on MIKE21 FM. South-to-North
      Water Diversion and Water Conservancy Science and Technology 16(02), 151–157.
      Guo, F. Q., Qu, H. F., Zeng, H., Cong, P. T. & Geng, X. 2013 Numerical simulation of flood evolution in flood storage area based
      on MIKE21 FM model. Hydropower Energy Science 31(05), 34–37.

      Huang, X., Wang, L. L. & Tang, H. W. 2017 Study on the law of the influence of Bridge Pier Shape of Plain River Course on
      River Backwater. In: The 14th National Hydrodynamics Conference and the 28th National Hydrodynamics Conference
      Proceedings (Volume 2). Ed. China Ocean Press. pp. 858–866.
      Liu, X. C., Geng, P. C., Cao, L. & Sun, X. L. 2020 Mike21 simulates the influence of cross-river bridge on river regime. People’s
      Yellow River 42(S1), 24–25 þ 29.
      Luo, W. G., Lu, J. & Lai, H. 2015 Research on the backwater in front of multiple parallel bridge piers at equal distances. Journal
      of Sichuan University: Engineering Science Edition 47(4), 6–13.
      Luo, M., Huang, E. & Li, G. 2018 Optimization of water intake layout in an irrigation area based on MIKE21FM numerical
      simulation. Hydropower Energy Science 36(03), 118–122.
      Milad, H., Mohammad, A. Z. & Mohammad, M. A. 2019 Simulation of turbulent flow around tandem piers. Iranian Journal of
      Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 43(4).
      Ren, M. F., Xu, Z. X. & Su, G. G. 2017 Calculation and comparative analysis of bridge backwater based on two-dimensional
      hydrodynamic model and empirical formula. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering 36(05), 78–87.
      Selahattin, K. 2014 Prediction of backwater profiles due to bridges in a compound channel using CFD. Advances in Mechanical
      Engineering 6.
      Sulaiman, D. J., Adnan, A. I. & Manahil, A. T. 2019 Simulation analyses of flow in the wake region of non-uniform bridge pier
      by using computational fluid dynamic. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (6).
      Wan, L. M. & Li, P. J. 2018 Numerical simulation of navigable flow conditions of bridges across rivers. Water Conservancy
      Science and Technology and Economy 24(02), 28–33.
      Wang, L. L., Zhang, F. S. & Tang, H. W. 2016 Relationship between water resistance ratio and congestion characteristics of
      bridge piers in plains rivers. Journal of River and Sea University (Natural Science Edition) 44(05), 386–392.
      Wang, S. T. 2019 On the application of numerical simulation of river and coast hydrodynamics. Engineering and Construction
      33(01), 13–16.
      Wang, P., He, Y. & Du, Z. S. 2020a Study on urban design flood simulation based on hydrodynamic numerical calculation.
      Journal of Xi’an University of Technology 1–6(11–04).
      Wang, Q. X., Peng, W. Q., Dong, F., Liu, X. B. & Ou, N. 2020b Simulating flow of an urban river course with complex cross
      sections based on the MIKE21 FM model. Water 12(3).
      Wei, X. L., Yang, S. F., Hu, P. F. & Ma, X. H. 2016 The influence of tandem cylindrical bridge piers on navigable water flow
      based on two-dimensional mathematical model. Water Transport Engineering (08), 75–81.
      Wu, P., Balachandar, R. & Ramamurthy, A. 2018 Effects of splitter plate on reducing local scour around bridge pier. River
      Research and Applications 34(10).
      Xu, D., Yang, H. T., Wang, D., He, C. N., Bai, Y. C. & J, Z. Z. 2018 Numerical simulation study on the congestion characteristics
      of river diagonal bridge piers. Journal of Hydropower 37(08), 55–63.
      Yang, L. H., Li, J. Z., Kang, A. Q., Li, S. & Feng, P. 2020 The effect of nonstationarity in rainfall on urban flooding based on
      coupling SWMM and MIKE21. Water Resources Management. (prepublish).
      Yu, P. & Zhu, L. K. 2020 Numerical simulation of local scour around bridge piers using novel inlet turbulent boundary
      conditions. Ocean Engineering 218, 108166.

      하류하천의 영향 최소화를 위한 보조 여수로 최적 활용방안 검토

      The Optimal Operation on Auxiliary Spillway to Minimize the Flood Damage in Downstream River with Various Outflow Conditions

      하류하천의 영향 최소화를 위한 보조 여수로 최적 활용방안 검토

      Hyung Ju Yoo1, Sung Sik Joo2, Beom Jae Kwon3, Seung Oh Lee4*

      유 형주1, 주 성식2, 권 범재3, 이 승오4*

      1Ph.D Student, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University
      2Director, Water Resources & Environment Department, HECOREA
      3Director, Water Resources Department, ISAN
      4Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University

      1홍익대학교 건설환경공학과 박사과정
      2㈜헥코리아 수자원환경사업부 이사
      3㈜이산 수자원부 이사
      4홍익대학교 건설환경공학과 교수

      ABSTRACT

      최근 기후변화로 인해 강우강도 및 빈도의 증가에 따른 집중호우의 영향 및 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 홍수 시 하류 하천의 영향을 최소화할 수 있는 보조 여수로 활용방안 구축이 필요한 실정이다. 이를 위해, 수리모형 실험 및 수치모형 실험을 통하여 보조 여수로 운영에 따른 흐름특성 변화 검토에 관한 연구가 많이 진행되어 왔다. 그러나 대부분의 연구는 여수로에서의 흐름특성 및 기능성에 대한 검토를 수행하였을 뿐 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 따른 하류하천 영향 검토 및 호안 안정성 검토에 관한 연구는 미비한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 방류 조건에 따른 하류영향 분석 및 호안 안정성 측면에서 최적 방류 시나리오 검토를 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 사용하여 검토하였다. 또한 FLOW-3D 수치모의 수행을 통한 유속, 수위 결과와 소류력 산정 결과를 호안 설계허용 기준과 비교하였다. 수문 완전 개도 조건으로 가정하고 계획홍수량 유입 시 다양한 보조 여수로 활용방안에 대하여 수치모의를 수행한 결과, 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 기존 여수로 단독운영에 비하여 최대유속 및 최대 수위의 감소효과를 확인하였다. 다만 계획홍수량의 45% 이하 방류 조건에서 대안부의 호안 안정성을 확보하였고 해당 방류량 초과 경우에는 처오름 현상이 발생하여 월류에 대한 위험성 증가를 확인하였다. 따라서 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 방안 도출이 중요하다고 판단하였다. 여수로의 배분 비율 및 총 허용 방류량에 대하여 검토한 결과 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량보다 큰 경우 하류하천의 흐름이 중심으로 집중되어 대안부의 유속 저감 및 수위 감소를 확인하였고, 계획 홍수량의 77% 이하의 조건에서 호안의 허용 유속 및 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하였다. 이를 통하여 본 연구에서 제안한 보조 여수로 활용방안으로는 기존 여수로와 동시 운영 시 총 방류량에 대하여 보조 여수로의 배분량이 기존 여수로의 배분량보다 크게 설정하는 것이 하류하천의 영향을 최소화 할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 본 연구는 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서의 영향에 대해서만 검토하였고 수문 전면 개도 조건에서 검토하였다는 한계점은 분명히 있다. 이에 향후에는 다양한 수문 개도 조건 및 방류 시나리오를 적용 및 검토한다면 보다 효율적이고, 효과적인 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출이 가능할 것으로 기대 된다.

      키워드 : 보조 여수로, FLOW-3D, 수치모의, 호안 안정성, 소류력

      1. 서 론

      최근 기후변화로 인한 집중호우의 영향으로 홍수 시 댐으로 유입되는 홍수량이 설계 홍수량보다 증가하여 댐 안정성 확보가 필요한 실정이다(Office for Government Policy Coordination, 2003). MOLIT & K-water(2004)에서는 기존댐의 수문학적 안정성 검토를 수행하였으며 이상홍수 발생 시 24개 댐에서 월류 등으로 인한 붕괴위험으로 댐 하류지역의 극심한 피해를 예상하여 보조여수로 신설 및 기존여수로 확장 등 치수능력 증대 기본계획을 수립하였고 이를 통하여 극한홍수 발생 시 홍수량 배제능력을 증대하여 기존댐의 안전성 확보 및 하류지역의 피해를 방지하고자 하였다. 여기서 보조 여수로는 기존 여수로와 동시 또는 별도 운영하는 여수로로써 비상상황 시 방류 기능을 포함하고 있고(K-water, 2021), 최근에는 기존 여수로의 노후화에 따라 보조여수로의 활용방안에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 3차원 수치해석을 수행하여 기존 및 보조 여수로의 방류량 조합에 따른 하류 영향을 분석하고 하류 호안 안정성 측면에서 최적 방류 시나리오를 검토하고자 한다.

      기존의 댐 여수로 검토에 관한 연구는 주로 수리실험을 통하여 방류조건 별 흐름특성을 검토하였으나 최근에는 수치모형 실험결과가 수리모형실험과 비교하여 근사한 것을 확인하는 등 점차 수치모형실험을 수리모형실험의 대안으로 활용하고 있다(Jeon et al., 2006Kim, 2007Kim et al., 2008). 국내의 경우, Jeon et al.(2006)은 수리모형 실험과 수치모의를 이용하여 임하댐 바상여수로의 기본설계안을 도출하였고, Kim et al.(2008)은 가능최대홍수량 유입 시 비상여수로 방류에 따른 수리학적 안정성과 기능성을 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 활용하여 검토하였다. 또한 Kim and Kim(2013)은 충주댐의 홍수조절 효과 검토 및 방류량 변화에 따른 상·하류의 수위 변화를 수치모형을 통하여 검토하였다. 국외의 경우 Zeng et al.(2017)은 3차원 수치모형인 Fluent를 활용한 여수로 방류에 따른 흐름특성 결과와 측정결과를 비교하여 수치모형 결과의 신뢰성을 검토하였다. Li et al.(2011)은 가능 최대 홍수량(Probable Maximum Flood, PMF)조건에서 기존 여수로와 신규 보조 여수로 유입부 주변의 흐름특성에 대하여 3차원 수치모형 Fluent를 활용하여 검토하였고, Lee et al.(2019)는 서로 근접해있는 기존 여수로와 보조여수로 동시 운영 시 방류능 검토를 수리모형 실험 및 수치모형 실험(FLOW-3D)을 통하여 수행하였으며 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로를 동시운영하게 되면 배수로 간섭으로 인하여 총 방류량이 7.6%까지 감소되어 댐의 방류능력이 감소하였음을 확인하였다.

      그러나 대부분의 여수로 검토에 대한 연구는 여수로 내에서의 흐름특성 및 기능성에 대한 검토를 수행하였고. 이에 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류운영에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 변화 및 호안 안정성 평가에 관한 추가적인 검토가 필요한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 방류 조건에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 호안 안정성분석을 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 이용하여 검토하였다. 또한 다양한 방류 배분 비율 및 허용 방류량 조건 변화에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력 분석결과를 호안 설계 허용유속 및 허용 소류력 기준과 비교하여 하류하천의 영향을 최소화 할 수 있는 최적의 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출하고자 한다.

      2. 본 론

      2.1 이론적 배경

      2.1.1 3차원 수치모형의 기본이론

      FLOW-3D는 미국 Flow Science, Inc에서 개발한 범용 유체역학 프로그램(CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics)으로 자유 수면을 갖는 흐름모의에 사용되는 3차원 수치해석 모형이다. 난류모형을 통해 난류 해석이 가능하고, 댐 방류에 따른 하류 하천의 흐름 해석에도 많이 사용되어 왔다(Flow Science, 2011). 본 연구에서는 FLOW-3D(version 12.0)을 이용하여 홍수 시 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대한 검토를 하류하천의 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토하였다.

      2.1.2 유동해석의 지배방정식

      1) 연속 방정식(Continuity Equation)

      FLOW-3D는 비압축성 유체에 대하여 연속방정식을 사용하며, 밀도는 상수항으로 적용된다. 연속 방정식은 Eqs. (1)(2)와 같다.

      (1)

      ∇·v=0

      (2)

      ∂∂x(uAx)+∂∂y(vAy)+∂∂z(wAz)=RSORρ

      여기서, ρ는 유체 밀도(kg/m3), u, v, w는 x, y, z방향의 유속(m/s), Ax, Ay, Az는 각 방향의 요소면적(m2), RSOR는 질량 생성/소멸(mass source/sink)항을 의미한다.

      2) 운동량 방정식(Momentum Equation)

      각 방향 속도성분 u, v, w에 대한 운동방정식은 Navier-Stokes 방정식으로 다음 Eqs. (3)(4)(5)와 같다.

      (3)

      ∂u∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂x+Gx+fx-bx-RSORρVFu

      (4)

      ∂v∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂y+Gy+fy-by-RSORρVFv

      (5)

      ∂w∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂z+Gz+fz-bz-RSORρVFw

      여기서, Gx, Gy, Gz는 체적력에 의한 가속항, fx, fy, fz는 점성에 의한 가속항, bx, by, bz는 다공성 매체에서의 흐름손실을 의미한다.

      2.1.3 소류력 산정

      호안설계 시 제방사면 호안의 안정성 확보를 위해서는 하천의 흐름에 의하여 호안에 작용하는 소류력에 저항할 수 있는 재료 및 공법 선택이 필요하다. 국내의 경우 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)에서 계획홍수량 유하 시 소류력 산정 방법을 제시하고 있다. 소류력은 하천의 평균유속을 이용하여 산정할 수 있으며, 소류력 산정식은 Eqs. (6)(7)과 같다.

      1) Schoklitsch 공식

      Schoklitsch(1934)는 Chezy 유속계수를 적용하여 소류력을 산정하였다.

      (6)

      τ=γRI=γC2V2

      여기서, τ는 소류력(N/m2), R은 동수반경(m), γ는 물의 단위중량(10.0 kN/m3), I는 에너지경사, C는 Chezy 유속계수, V는 평균유속(m/s)을 의미한다.

      2) Manning 조도계수를 고려한 공식

      Chezy 유속계수를 대신하여 Manning의 조도계수를 고려하여 소류력을 산정할 수 있다.

      (7)

      τ=γn2V2R1/3

      여기서, τ는 소류력(N/m2), R은 동수반경(m), γ는 물의 단위중량(10.0 kN/m3), n은 Manning의 조도계수, V는 평균유속(m/s)을 의미한다.

      FLOW-3D 수치모의 수행을 통하여 하천의 바닥 유속을 도출할 수 있으며, 본 연구에서는 Maning 조도계수롤 고려하여 소류력을 산정하고자 한다. 소류력을 산정하기 위해서 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부의 바닥유속 변화를 검토하여 최대 유속 값을 이용하였다. 최종적으로 산정한 소류력과 호안의 재료 및 공법에 따른 허용 소류력과 비교하여 제방사면 호안의 안정성 검토를 수행하게 된다.

      2.2 하천호안 설계기준

      하천 호안은 계획홍수위 이하의 유수작용에 대하여 안정성이 확보되도록 계획하여야 하며, 호안의 설계 시에는 사용재료의 확보용이성, 시공상의 용이성, 세굴에 대한 굴요성(flexibility) 등을 고려하여 호안의 형태, 시공방법 등을 결정한다(MOLIT, 2019). 국내의 경우, 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)에서는 다양한 호안공법에 대하여 비탈경사에 따라 설계 유속을 비교하거나, 허용 소류력을 비교함으로써 호안의 안정성을 평가한다. 호안에 대한 국외의 설계기준으로 미국의 경우, ASTM(미국재료시험학회)에서 호안블록 및 식생매트 시험방법을 제시하였고 제품별로 ASTM 시험에 의한 허용유속 및 허용 소류력을 제시하였다. 일본의 경우, 호안 블록에 대한 축소실험을 통하여 항력을 측정하고 이를 통해서 호안 블록에 대한 항력계수를 제시하고 있다. 설계 시에는 항력계수에 의한 블록의 안정성을 평가하고 있으나, 최근에는 세굴의 영향을 고려할 수 있는 호안 안정성 평가의 필요성을 제기하고 있다(MOLIT, 2019). 관련된 국내·외의 하천호안 설계기준은 Table 1에 정리하여 제시하였고, 본 연구에서 하천 호안 안정성 평가 시 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)과 ASTM 시험에서 제시한 허용소류력 및 허용유속 기준을 비교하여 각각 0.28 kN/m2, 5.0 m/s 미만일 경우 호안 안정성을 확보하였다고 판단하였다.

      Table 1.

      Standard of Permissible Velocity and Shear on Revetment

      Country (Reference)MaterialPermissible velocity (Vp, m/s)Permissible Shear (τp, kN/m2)
      KoreaRiver Construction Design Practice Guidelines
      (MOLIT, 2016)
      Vegetated5.00.50
      Stone5.00.80
      USAASTM D’6460Vegetated6.10.81
      Unvegetated5.00.28
      JAPANDynamic Design Method of Revetment5.0

      2.3. 보조여수로 운영에 따른 하류하천 영향 분석

      2.3.1 모형의 구축 및 경계조건

      본 연구에서는 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 홍수 시 보조여수로의 활용방안에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 호안안정성 평가를 수행하기 위해 FLOW-3D 모형을 이용하였다. 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로는 치수능력 증대사업(MOLIT & K-water, 2004)을 통하여 완공된 ○○댐의 제원을 이용하여 구축하였다. ○○댐은 설계빈도(100년) 및 200년빈도 까지는 계획홍수위 이내로 기존 여수로를 통하여 운영이 가능하나 그 이상 홍수조절은 보조여수로를 통하여 조절해야 하며, 또한 2011년 기존 여수로 정밀안전진단 결과 사면의 표층 유실 및 옹벽 밀림현상 등이 확인되어 노후화에 따른 보수·보강이 필요한 상태이다. 이에 보조여수로의 활용방안 검토가 필요한 것으로 판단하여 본 연구의 대상댐으로 선정하였다. 하류 하천의 흐름특성을 예측하기 위하여 격자간격을 0.99 ~ 8.16 m의 크기로 하여 총 격자수는 49,102,500개로 구성하였으며, 여수로 방류에 따른 하류하천의 흐름해석을 위한 경계조건으로 상류는 유입유량(inflow), 바닥은 벽면(wall), 하류는 수위(water surface elevation)조건으로 적용하도록 하였다(Table 2Fig. 1 참조). FLOW-3D 난류모형에는 혼합길이 모형, 난류에너지 모형, k-ϵ모형, RNG(Renormalized Group Theory) k-ϵ모형, LES 모형 등이 있으며, 본 연구에서는 여수로 방류에 따른 복잡한 난류 흐름 및 높은 전단흐름을 정확하게 모의(Flow Science, 2011)할 수 있는 RNG k-ϵ모형을 사용하였고, 하류하천 호안의 안정성 측면에서 보조여수로의 활용방안을 검토하기 위하여 방류시나리오는 Table 3에 제시된 것 같이 설정하였다. Case 1 및 Case 2를 통하여 계획홍수량에 대하여 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 단독 운영이 하류하천에 미치는 영향을 확인하였고 보조 여수로의 방류량 조절을 통하여 호안 안정성 측면에서 보조 여수로 방류능 검토를 수행하였다(Case 3 ~ Case 6). 또한 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분에 따른 하류하천의 영향 검토(Case 7 ~ Case 10) 및 방류 배분에 따른 허용 방류량을 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토를 수행하였다(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

      수문은 완전개도 조건으로 가정하였으며 하류하천의 계획홍수량에 대한 기존 여수로와 보조여수로의 배분량을 조절하여 모의를 수행하였다. 여수로는 콘크리트의 조도계수 값(Chow, 1959)을 채택하였고, 댐 하류하천의 조도계수는 하천기본계획(Busan Construction and Management Administration, 2009) 제시된 조도계수 값을 채택하였으며 FLOW-3D의 적용을 위하여 Manning-Strickler 공식(Vanoni, 2006)을 이용하여 조도계수를 조고값으로 변환하여 사용하였다. Manning-Strickler 공식은 Eq. (8)과 같으며, FLOW-3D에 적용한 조도계수 및 조고는 Table 4와 같다.

      (8)

      n=ks1/68.1g1/2

      여기서, kS는 조고 (m), n은 Manning의 조도계수, g는 중력가속도(m/s2)를 의미한다.

      시간에 따라 동일한 유량이 일정하게 유입되도록 모의를 수행하였으며, 시간간격(Time Step)은 0.0001초로 설정(CFL number < 1.0) 하였다. 또한 여수로 수문을 통한 유량의 변동 값이 1.0%이내일 경우는 연속방정식을 만족하고 있다고 가정하였다. 이는, 유량의 변동 값이 1.0%이내일 경우 유속의 변동 값 역시 1.0%이내이며, 수치모의 결과 1.0%의 유속변동은 호안의 유속설계기준에 크게 영향을 미치지 않는다고 판단하였다. 그 결과 모든 수치모의 Case에서 2400초 이내에 결과 값이 수렴하는 것을 확인하였다.

      Table 2.

      Mesh sizes and numerical conditions

      MeshNumbers49,102,500 EA
      Increment (m)DirectionExisting SpillwayAuxiliary Spillway
      ∆X0.99 ~ 4.301.00 ~ 4.30
      ∆Y0.99 ~ 8.161.00 ~ 5.90
      ∆Z0.50 ~ 1.220.50 ~ 2.00
      Boundary ConditionsXmin / YmaxInflow / Water Surface Elevation
      Xmax, Ymin, Zmin / ZmaxWall / Symmetry
      Turbulence ModelRNG model
      Table 3.

      Case of numerical simulation (Qp : Design flood discharge)

      CaseExisting Spillway (Qe, m3/s)Auxiliary Spillway (Qa, m3/s)Remarks
      1Qp0Reference case
      20Qp
      300.58QpReview of discharge capacity on
      auxiliary spillway
      400.48Qp
      500.45Qp
      600.32Qp
      70.50Qp0.50QpDetermination of optimal division
      ratio on Spillways
      80.61Qp0.39Qp
      90.39Qp0.61Qp
      100.42Qp0.58Qp
      110.32Qp0.45QpDetermination of permissible
      division on Spillways
      120.35Qp0.48Qp
      130.38Qp0.53Qp
      140.41Qp0.56Qp
      Table 4.

      Roughness coefficient and roughness height

      CriteriaRoughness coefficient (n)Roughness height (ks, m)
      Structure (Concrete)0.0140.00061
      River0.0330.10496
      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F1.jpg
      Fig. 1

      Layout of spillway and river in this study

      2.3.2 보조 여수로의 방류능 검토

      본 연구에서는 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분에 따른 하류하천 대안부의 유속분포 및 수위분포를 검토하기 위해 수치모의 Case 별 다음과 같이 관심구역을 설정하였다(Fig. 2 참조). 관심구역(대안부)의 길이(L)는 총 1.3 km로 10 m 등 간격으로 나누어 검토하였으며, Section 1(0 < X/L < 0.27)은 기존 여수로 방류에 따른 영향이 지배적인 구간, Section 2(0.27 < X/L < 1.00)는 보조 여수로 방류에 따른 영향이 지배적인 구간으로 각 구간에서의 수위, 유속, 수심결과를 확인하였다. 기존 여수로의 노후화에 따른 보조 여수로의 방류능 검토를 위하여 Case 1 – Case 6까지의 결과를 비교하였다.

      보조 여수로의 단독 운영 시 기존 여수로 운영 시 보다 하류하천의 대안부의 최대 유속(Vmax)은 약 3% 감소하였으며, 이는 보조 여수로의 하천 유입각이 기존 여수로 보다 7°작으며 유입하천의 폭이 증가하여 유속이 감소한 것으로 판단된다. 대안부의 최대 유속 발생위치는 하류 쪽으로 이동하였으며 교량으로 인한 단면의 축소로 최대유속이 발생하는 것으로 판단된다. 또한 보조 여수로의 배분량(Qa)이 증가함에 따라 하류하천 대안부의 최대 유속이 증가하였다. 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시하고 있는 허용유속(Vp)과 비교한 결과, 계획홍수량(Qp)의 45% 이하(Case 5 & 6)를 보조 여수로에서 방류하게 되면 허용 유속(5.0 m/s)조건을 만족하여 호안안정성을 확보하였다(Fig. 3 참조). 허용유속 외에도 대안부에서의 소류력을 산정하여 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시한 허용 소류력(τp)과 비교한 결과, 유속과 동일하게 보조 여수로의 방류량이 계획홍수량의 45% 이하일 경우 허용소류력(0.28 kN/m2) 조건을 만족하였다(Fig. 4 참조). 각 Case 별 호안설계조건과 비교한 결과는 Table 5에 제시하였다.

      하류하천의 수위도 기존 여수로 운영 시 보다 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 최대 수위(ηmax)가 약 2% 감소하는 효과를 보였으며 최대 수위 발생위치는 수충부로 여수로 방류시 처오름에 의한 수위 상승으로 판단된다. 기존 여수로의 단독운영(Case 1)의 수위(ηref)를 기준으로 보조 여수로의 방류량이 증가함에 따라 수위는 증가하였으나 계획홍수량의 58%까지 방류할 경우 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보되었다(Fig. 5 참조). 그러나 계획홍수량 조건에서는 월류에 대한 위험성이 존재하기 때문에 기존여수로와 보조여수로의 적절한 방류량 배분 조합을 도출하는 것이 중요하다고 판단되어 진다.

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F2.jpg
      Fig. 2

      Region of interest in this study

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F3.jpg
      Fig. 3

      Maximum velocity and location of Vmax according to Qa

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F4.jpg
      Fig. 4

      Maximum shear according to Qa

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F5.jpg
      Fig. 5

      Maximum water surface elevation and location of ηmax according to Qa

      Table 5.

      Numerical results for each cases (Case 1 ~ Case 6)

      CaseMaximum Velocity
      (Vmax, m/s)
      Maximum Shear
      (τmax, kN/m2)
      Evaluation
      in terms of Vp
      Evaluation
      in terms of τp
      1
      (Qa = 0)
      9.150.54No GoodNo Good
      2
      (Qa = Qp)
      8.870.56No GoodNo Good
      3
      (Qa = 0.58Qp)
      6.530.40No GoodNo Good
      4
      (Qa = 0.48Qp)
      6.220.36No GoodNo Good
      5
      (Qa = 0.45Qp)
      4.220.12AccpetAccpet
      6
      (Qa = 0.32Qp)
      4.040.14AccpetAccpet

      2.3.3 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류량 배분 검토

      기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 단독운영에 따른 하류하천 및 호안의 안정성 평가를 수행한 결과 계획홍수량 방류 시 하류하천 대안부에서 호안 설계 조건(허용유속 및 허용 소류력)을 초과하였으며, 처오름에 의한 수위 상승으로 월류에 대한 위험성 증가를 확인하였다. 따라서 계획 홍수량 조건에서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분을 통하여 호안 안정성을 확보하고 하류하천에 방류로 인한 피해를 최소화할 수 있는 배분조합(Case 7 ~ Case 10)을 검토하였다. Case 7은 기존 여수로와 보조여수로의 배분 비율을 균등하게 적용한 경우이고, Case 8은 기존 여수로의 배분량이 보조 여수로에 비하여 많은 경우, Case 9는 보조 여수로의 배분량이 기존 여수로에 비하여 많은 경우를 의미한다. 최대유속을 비교한 결과 보조 여수로의 배분 비율이 큰 경우 기존 여수로의 배분량에 의하여 흐름이 하천 중심에 집중되어 대안부의 유속을 저감하는 효과를 확인하였다. 보조여수로의 방류량 배분 비율이 증가할수록 기존 여수로 대안부 측(0.00<X/L<0.27, Section 1) 유속 분포는 감소하였으나, 신규여수로 대안부 측(0.27<X/L<1.00, Section 2) 유속은 증가하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 6 참조). 그러나 유속 저감 효과에도 대안부 전구간에서 설계 허용유속 조건을 초과하여 제방의 안정성을 확보하지는 못하였다. 소류력 산정 결과 유속과 동일하게 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량 보다 크면 감소하는 것을 확인하였고 일부 구간에서는 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 7 참조).

      따라서 유속 저감효과가 있는 배분 비율 조건(Qa>Qe)에서 Section 2에 유속 저감에 영향을 미치는 기존 여수로 방류량 배분 비율을 증가시켜 추가 검토(Case 10)를 수행하였다. 단독운영과 비교 시 하류하천에 유입되는 유량은 증가하였음에도 불구하고 기존 여수로 방류량에 의해 흐름이 하천 중심으로 집중되는 현상에 따라 대안부의 유속은 단독 운영에 비하여 감소하는 것을 확인하였고(Fig. 8 참조), 호안 설계 허용유속 및 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하는 구간이 발생하여 호안 안정성도 확보한 것으로 판단되었다. 최종적으로 각 Case 별 수위 결과의 경우 여수로 동시 운영을 수행하게 되면 대안부 전 구간에서 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보하였다(Fig. 9 참조). 각 Case 별 대안부에서 최대 유속결과 및 산정한 소류력은 Table 6에 제시하였다.

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F6.jpg
      Fig. 6

      Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F7.jpg
      Fig. 7

      Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F8.jpg
      Fig. 8

      Velocity results of FLOW-3D (a: auxiliary spillway operation only , b : simultaneous operation of spillways)

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F9.jpg
      Fig. 9

      Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

      Table 6.

      Numerical results for each cases (Case 7 ~ Case 10)

      Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity (Vmax, m/s)Maximum Shear
      (τmax, kN/m2)
      Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of τp
      Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
      7
      Qe : 0.50QpQa : 0.50Qp
      8.106.230.640.30No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
      8
      Qe : 0.61QpQa : 0.39Qp
      8.886.410.610.34No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
      9
      Qe : 0.39QpQa : 0.61Qp
      6.227.330.240.35No GoodNo GoodAcceptNo Good
      10
      Qe : 0.42QpQa : 0.58Qp
      6.394.790.300.19No GoodAcceptNo GoodAccept

      2.3.4 방류량 배분 비율의 허용 방류량 검토

      계획 홍수량 방류 시 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 배분 비율 검토 결과 Case 10(Qe = 0.42Qp, Qa = 0.58Qp)에서 방류에 따른 하류 하천의 피해를 최소화시킬 수 있는 것을 확인하였다. 그러나 대안부 전 구간에 대하여 호안 설계조건을 만족하지 못하였다. 따라서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류 배분 비율을 고정시킨 후 총 방류량을 조절하여 허용 방류량을 검토하였다(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

      호안 안정성 측면에서 검토한 결과 계획홍수량 대비 총 방류량이 감소하면 최대 유속 및 최대 소류력이 감소하고 최종적으로 계획 홍수량의 77%를 방류할 경우 하류하천의 대안부에서 호안 설계조건을 모두 만족하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 10Fig. 11 참조). 각 Case 별 대안부에서 최대 유속결과 및 산정한 소류력은 Table 7에 제시하였다. 또한 Case 별 수위 검토 결과 처오름으로 인한 대안부 전 구간에서 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보하였다(Fig. 12 참조).

      Table 7.

      Numerical results for each cases (Case 11 ~ Case 14)

      Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity
      (Vmax, m/s)
      Maximum Shear
      (τmax, kN/m2)
      Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of τp
      Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
      11
      Qe : 0.32QpQa : 0.45Qp
      3.634.530.090.26AcceptAcceptAcceptAccept
      12
      Qe : 0.35QpQa : 0.48Qp
      5.745.180.230.22No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
      13
      Qe : 0.38QpQa : 0.53Qp
      6.704.210.280.11No GoodAcceptAcceptAccept
      14
      Qe : 0.41QpQa : 0.56Qp
      6.545.240.280.24No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F10.jpg
      Fig. 10

      Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F11.jpg
      Fig. 11

      Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

      /media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F12.jpg
      Fig. 12

      Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

      3. 결 론

      본 연구에서는 홍수 시 기존 여수로의 노후화로 인한 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대하여 하류하천의 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토하였다. 여수로 방류로 인한 하류하천의 흐름특성을 검토하기 위하여 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 활용하였고, 여수로 지형은 치수능력 증대사업을 통하여 완공된 ○○댐의 제원을 이용하였다. 하류하천 조도 계수 및 여수로 방류량은 하천기본계획을 참고하여 적용하였다. 최종적으로 여수로 방류로 인한 하류하천의 피해를 최소화 시킬 수 있는 적절한 보조 여수로의 활용방안을 도출하기 위하여 보조 여수로 단독 운영과 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영에 따른 하류 하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력의 변화를 검토하였다.

      수문은 완전 개도 상태에서 방류한다는 가정으로 계획 홍수량 조건에서 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 하류하천 대안부의 유속 및 수위를 검토한 결과 기존 여수로 단독운영에 비하여 최대 유속 및 최대 수위가 감소하는 것을 확인할 수 있었으며, 이는 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 하류하천으로 유입각도가 작아지고, 유입되는 하천의 폭이 증가되기 때문이다. 그러나 계획 홍수량 조건에서 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시한 허용 유속(5.0 m/s)과 허용 소류력(0.28 kN/m2)과 비교하였을 때 호안 안정성을 확보하지 못하였으며, 계획홍수량의 45% 이하 방류 시에 대안부의 호안 안정성을 확보하였다. 수위의 경우 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서 처오름 현상이 발생하여 월류에 대한 위험성을 확인하였고 이를 통하여 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 방안을 도출하는 것이 중요하다고 판단된다. 따라서 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 측면에서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 배분 비율 및 총 방류량을 변화시켜가며 하류 하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력의 변화를 검토하였다. 배분 비율의 경우 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 균등 배분(Case 7) 및 편중 배분(Case 8 & Case 9)을 검토하여 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량보다 큰 경우 하류하천의 중심부로 집중되어 대안부의 최대유속, 최대소류력 및 최대수위가 감소하는 것을 확인하였다. 이를 근거로 기존 여수로의 방류 비율을 증가(Qe=0.42Qp, Qa=0.58Qp)시켜 검토한 결과 대안부 일부 구간에서 허용 유속 및 허용소류력 조건을 만족하는 것을 확인하였다. 이를 통하여 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 동시 운영을 통하여 적절한 방류량 배분 비율을 도출하는 것이 방류로 인한 하류하천의 피해를 저감하는데 효과적인 것으로 판단된다. 그러나 설계홍수량 방류 시 전 구간에서 허용 유속 및 소류력 조건을 만족하지 못하였다. 최종적으로 전체 방류량에서 기존 여수로의 방류 비율을 42%, 보조 여수로의 방류 비율을 58%로 설정하여 허용방류량을 검토한 결과, 계획홍수량의 77%이하로 방류 시 대안부의 최대유속은 기존여수로 방류의 지배영향구간(section 1)에서 3.63 m/s, 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류의 영향구간(section 2)에서 4.53 m/s로 허용유속 조건을 만족하였고, 산정한 소류력도 각각 0.09 kN/m2 및 0.26 kN/m2로 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하여 대안부 호안의 안정성을 확보하였다고 판단된다.

      본 연구 결과는 기후변화 및 기존여수로의 노후화로 인하여 홍수 시 기존여수로의 단독운영으로 하류하천의 피해가 발생할 수 있는 현시점에서 치수증대 사업으로 완공된 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있고, 향후 계획 홍수량 유입 시 최적의 배분 비율 및 허용 방류량 도출에 이용할 수 있다. 다만 본 연구는 여수로 방류에 따른 제방에 작용하는 수충력은 검토하지 못하고, 허용 유속 및 허용소류력은 제방과 유수의 방향이 일정한 구간에 대하여 검토하였다. 또한 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서의 영향에 대해서만 검토하였고 수문 전면 개도 조건에서 검토하였다는 한계점은 분명히 있다. 이에 향후에는 다양한 수문 개도 조건 및 방류 시나리오를 적용 및 검토하여 보다 효율적이고, 효과적인 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출하고자 한다.

      Acknowledgements

      본 결과물은 K-water에서 수행한 기존 및 신규 여수로 효율적 연계운영 방안 마련(2021-WR-GP-76-149)의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다.

      References

      1 Busan Construction and Management Administration (2009). Nakdonggang River Master Plan. Busan: BCMA.

      2 Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill. New York.

      3 Flow Science (2011). Flow3D User Manual. Santa Fe: NM.

      4 Jeon, T. M., Kim, H. I., Park, H. S., and Baek, U. I. (2006). Design of Emergency Spillway Using Hydraulic and Numerical Model-ImHa Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1726-1731.

      5 Kim, D. G., Park, S. J., Lee, Y. S., and Hwang, J. H. (2008). Spillway Design by Using Numerical Model Experiment – Case Study of AnDong Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1604-1608.

      6 Kim, J. S. (2007). Comparison of Hydraulic Experiment and Numerical Model on Spillway. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.

      7 Kim, S. H. and Kim, J. S. (2013). Effect of Chungju Dam Operation for Flood Control in the Upper Han River. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537

      8 K-water (2021). Regulations of Dam Management. Daejeon: K-water.

      9 K-water and MOLIT (2004). Report on the Establishment of Basic Plan for the Increasing Flood Capacity and Review of Hydrological Stability of Dams. Sejong: K-water and MOLIT.

      10 Lee, J. H., Julien, P. Y., and Thornton, C. I. (2019). Interference of Dual Spillways Operations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 145(5): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001593

      11 Li, S., Cain, S., Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H., and Wyckoff, R. (2011). Numerical Modeling of Probable Maximum Flood Flowing through a System of Spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 137(1): 66-74. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000279

      12 MOLIT (2016). Practice Guidelines of River Construction Design. Sejong: MOLIT.

      13 MOLIT (2019). Standards of River Design. Sejong: MOLIT.

      14 Prime Minister’s Secretariat (2003). White Book on Flood Damage Prevention Measures. Sejong: PMS.

      15 Schoklitsch, A. (1934). Der Geschiebetrieb und Die Geschiebefracht. Wasserkraft Wasserwirtschaft. 4: 1-7.

      16 Vanoni, V. A. (Ed.). (2006). Sedimentation Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers. Virginia: ASCE. 10.1061/9780784408230

      17 Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Ansar, M., Damisse, E., and González-Castro, J. A. (2017). Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Flow Ratings at Prototype Spillways and Weirs. I: Data Generation and Validation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 143(1): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001112

      Korean References Translated from the English

      1 건설교통부·한국수자원공사 (2004). 댐의 수문학적 안정성 검토 및 치수능력증대방안 기본계획 수립 보고서. 세종: 국토교통부.

      2 국무총리실 수해방지대책단 (2003). 수해방지대책 백서. 세종: 국무총리실.

      3 국토교통부 (2016). 하천공사 설계실무요령. 세종: 국토교통부.

      4 국토교통부 (2019). 하천설계기준해설. 세종: 국토교통부.

      5 김대근, 박선중, 이영식, 황종훈 (2008). 수치모형실험을 이용한 여수로 설계 – 안동다목적댐. 한국수자원학회 학술발표회. 1604-1608.

      6 김상호, 김지성 (2013). 충주댐 방류에 따른 댐 상하류 홍수위 영향 분석. 대한토목학회논문집. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537

      7 김주성 (2007). 댐 여수로부 수리 및 수치모형실험 비교 고찰. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.

      8 부산국토관리청 (2009). 낙동강수계 하천기본계획(변경). 부산: 부산국토관리청.

      9 전태명, 김형일, 박형섭, 백운일 (2006). 수리모형실험과 수치모의를 이용한 비상여수로 설계-임하댐. 한국수자원학회 학술발표회. 1726-1731.

      10 한국수자원공사 (2021). 댐관리 규정. 대전: 한국수자원공사.

      Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators

      2상 유동 해석을 통한 슈트 폭기 시스템 효율에 대한 램프 각도의 영향 조사

      Investigation of the Effect of Ramp Angle on Chute Aeration System Efficiency by Two-Phase Flow Analysis

      Authors

      1 Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, Iran

      2 Instructor in Civil Engineering Department Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful,Iran.

       10.22055/JISE.2021.37743.1980

      Abstract

      Flow aeration in chute spillway is one of the most effective and economic ways to prevent cavitation damage. Surface damage is significantly reduced when very small values of air are scattered in a water prism. A structure known as an aerator may be used for this purpose. Besides, ramp angle is one of the factors influencing aerator efficiency. In this research, the value of air entraining the flow through the Jarreh Dam’s spillway at the ramp angles of 6, 8 and 10 degrees, as three different scenarios, was simulated using the Flow-3D software. In order to validate the results of the inlet air into the flowing fluid at a ramp angle of 6 degrees, the observational results of the dam spillway physical model from the laboratory of TAMAB Company in Iran were used. According to the results, raising the ramp angle increases the inlet air to the water jet nappe, and a ten-degree ramp angle provides the best aeration efficiency. The Flow-3D model can also simulate the two-phase water-air flow on spillways, according to the results.

      슈트 여수로의 흐름 폭기는 캐비테이션 손상을 방지하는 가장 효과적이고 경제적인 방법 중 하나입니다. 수중 프리즘에 아주 작은 양의 공기가 흩어지면 표면 손상이 크게 줄어듭니다. 이를 위해 폭기 장치로 알려진 구조를 사용할 수 있습니다. 또한, 램프 각도는 폭기 효율에 영향을 미치는 요인 중 하나입니다. 이 연구에서는 FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 3가지 다른 시나리오인 6, 8 및 10도의 램프 각도에서 Jarreh 댐의 방수로를 통해 흐름을 동반하는 공기의 값을 시뮬레이션했습니다. 6도의 경사각에서 유동 유체로 유입되는 공기의 결과를 검증하기 위해이란 TAMAB Company의 실험실에서 댐 방수로 물리적 모델의 관찰 결과를 사용했습니다. 결과에 따르면 램프 각도를 높이면 워터제트 기저귀로 유입되는 공기가 증가하고 10도 램프 각도는 최고의 폭기 효율을 제공합니다. Flow-3D 모델은 결과에 따라 여수로의 2단계 물-공기 흐름을 시뮬레이션할 수도 있습니다.

      Keywords

      Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators
      Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators
      (a) The full-scale map of the Jarreh spillway’s plan and profile.
      (a) The full-scale map of the Jarreh spillway’s plan and profile.
      Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)
      Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)

      References

      1- Baharvand, S., & Lashkar-Ara, B. (2021). Hydraulic design criteria of the modified meander C-type
      fishway using the combined experimental and CFD models. Ecological Engineering, 164.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106207
      2- Bayon, A., Toro, J. P., Bombardelli, F. A., Matos, J., & López-Jiménez, P. A. (2018). Influence of VOF
      technique, turbulence model and discretization scheme on the numerical simulation of the non-aerated,
      skimming flow in stepped spillways. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 19, 137–149.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.002
      3- Brethour, J. M., & Hirt, C. W. (2009). Drift Model for Two-Component Flows. Flow Science, Inc., FSI09-TN83Rev, 1–7.
      4- Chanson, H. (1989). Study of air entrainment and aeration devices. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 27(3),
      301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688909499166
      5- Dong, Z., Wang, J., Vetsch, D. F., Boes, R. M., & Tan, G. (2019). Numerical simulation of air-water twophase flow on stepped spillways behind X-shaped flaring gate piers under very high unit discharge. Water
      (Switzerland), 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101956
      6- Flow-3D, V. 11. 2. (2017). User Manual. Flow Science Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA;
      7- Hirt, C. W. (2003). Modeling Turbulent Entrainment of Air at a Free Surface. Flow Science, Inc., FSI-03-
      TN6, 1–9.
      8- Hirt, C. W. (2016). Dynamic Droplet Sizes for Drift Fluxes. Flow Science, Inc., 1–10.
      9- Hirt, C. W., & Nichols, B. D. (1981). Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.
      Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
      10- Kherbache, K., Chesneau, X., Zeghmati, B., Abide, S., & Benmamar, S. (2017). The effects of step
      inclination and air injection on the water flow in a stepped spillway: A numerical study. Journal of
      Hydrodynamics, 29(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60742-4
      11- Kramer, M., & Chanson, H. (2019). Optical flow estimations in aerated spillway flows: Filtering and
      discussion on sampling parameters. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 103, 318–328.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.12.002
      12- Mahmoudian, Z., Baharvand, S., & Lashkarara, B. (2019). Investigating the Flow Pattern in Baffle
      Fishway Denil Type. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering (JISE), 42(3), 179–196.
      13- Meireles, I. C., Bombardelli, F. A., & Matos, J. (2014). Air entrainment onset in skimming flows on
      steep stepped spillways: An analysis. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 52(3).
      https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2013.878401
      14- Parsaie, A., & Haghiabi, A. H. (2019). Inception point of flow aeration on quarter-circular crested stepped
      spillway. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 69.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101618
      15- Richardson, J. F., & Zaki W N. (1979). Sedimentation and Fluidisation. Part 1. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng,
      32, 35–53.
      16- Shamloo, H., Hoseini Ghafari, S., & Kavianpour, M. (2012). Experimental study on the effects of inlet
      flows on aeration in chute spillway (Case study: Jare Dam, Iran). 10th International Congress on
      Advances in Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
      17- Wang, S. Y., Hou, D. M., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Aerator of stepped chute in Murum Hydropower
      Station. Procedia Engineering, 28, 803–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.813.
      18- Wei, W., Deng, J., & Zhang, F. (2016). Development of self-aeration process for supercritical chute
      flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 79, 172–180.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.11.003
      19- Wu, J., QIAN, S., & MA, F. (2016). A new design of ski-jump-step spillway. Journal of Hydrodynamics,
      05, 914–917.
      20- Xu, Y., Wang, W., Yong, H., & Zhao, W. (2012). Investigation on the cavity backwater of the jet flow from the chute aerators. Procedia Engineering, 31, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.989
      21- Yakhot, V., & Orszag, S. A. (1986). Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory.
      Journal of Scientific Computing, 1(1), 3–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061452
      22- Yang, J., Teng, P., & Lin, C. (2019). Air-vent layouts and water-air flow behaviors of a wide spillway
      aerator. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 9(2), 130–143.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2019.02.009
      23- Zhang, G., & Chanson, H. (2016). Interaction between free-surface aeration and total pressure on a
      stepped chute. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 74, 368–381.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.12.011

      Figure 2. Schematic diagram for pilot-scale cooling-water circulation system (a) along with a real picture of the system (b).

      Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Chlorine-Dynamics Modeling of In-Situ Chlorination Systems for Cooling Systems

      Jongchan Yi 1, Jonghun Lee 1, Mohd Amiruddin Fikri 2,3, Byoung-In Sang 4 and Hyunook Kim 1,*

      Abstract

      염소화는 상대적인 효율성과 저렴한 비용으로 인해 발전소 냉각 시스템에서 생물학적 오염을 제어하는​​데 선호되는 방법입니다. 해안 지역에 발전소가 있는 경우 바닷물을 사용하여 현장에서 염소를 전기화학적으로 생성할 수 있습니다. 이를 현장 전기염소화라고 합니다. 이 접근 방식은 유해한 염소화 부산물이 적고 염소를 저장할 필요가 없다는 점을 포함하여 몇 가지 장점이 있습니다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 이 전기화학적 공정은 실제로는 아직 초기 단계에 있습니다. 이 연구에서는 파일럿 규모 냉각 시스템에서 염소 붕괴를 시뮬레이션하기 위해 병렬 1차 동역학을 적용했습니다. 붕괴가 취수관을 따라 발생하기 때문에 동역학은 전산유체역학(CFD) 코드에 통합되었으며, 이후에 파이프의 염소 거동을 시뮬레이션하는데 적용되었습니다. 실험과 시뮬레이션 데이터는 강한 난류가 형성되는 조건하에서도 파이프 벽을 따라 염소 농도가 점진적인 것으로 나타났습니다. 염소가 중간보다 파이프 표면을 따라 훨씬 더 집중적으로 남아 있다는 사실은 전기 염소화를 기반으로 하는 시스템의 전체 염소 요구량을 감소시킬 수 있었습니다. 현장 전기 염소화 방식의 냉각 시스템은 직접 주입 방식에 필요한 염소 사용량의 1/3만 소비했습니다. 따라서 현장 전기염소화는 해안 지역의 발전소에서 바이오파울링 제어를 위한 비용 효율적이고 환경 친화적인 접근 방식으로 사용될 수 있다고 결론지었습니다.

      Chlorination is the preferred method to control biofouling in a power plant cooling system due to its comparative effectiveness and low cost. If a power plant is located in a coastal area, chlorine can be electrochemically generated in-situ using seawater, which is called in-situ electrochlorination; this approach has several advantages including fewer harmful chlorination byproducts and no need for chlorine storage. Nonetheless, this electrochemical process is still in its infancy in practice. In this study, a parallel first-order kinetics was applied to simulate chlorine decay in a pilot-scale cooling system. Since the decay occurs along the water-intake pipe, the kinetics was incorporated into computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes, which were subsequently applied to simulate chlorine behavior in the pipe. The experiment and the simulation data indicated that chlorine concentrations along the pipe wall were incremental, even under the condition where a strong turbulent flow was formed. The fact that chlorine remained much more concentrated along the pipe surface than in the middle allowed for the reduction of the overall chlorine demand of the system based on the electro-chlorination. The cooling system, with an in-situ electro-chlorination, consumed only 1/3 of the chlorine dose demanded by the direct injection method. Therefore, it was concluded that in-situ electro-chlorination could serve as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly approach for biofouling control at power plants on coastal areas.

      Keywords

      computational fluid dynamics; power plant; cooling system; electro-chlorination; insitu chlorination

      Figure 1. Electrodes and batch experiment set-up. (a) Two cylindrical electrodes used in this study. (b) Batch experiment set-up for kinetic tests.
      Figure 1. Electrodes and batch experiment set-up. (a) Two cylindrical electrodes used in this study. (b) Batch experiment set-up for kinetic tests.
      Figure 2. Schematic diagram for pilot-scale cooling-water circulation system (a) along with a real picture of the system (b).
      Figure 2. Schematic diagram for pilot-scale cooling-water circulation system (a) along with a real picture of the system (b).
      Figure 3. Free chlorine decay curves in seawater with different TOC and initial chlorine concentration. Each line represents the predicted concentration of chlorine under a given condition. (a) Artificial seawater solution with 1 mg L−1 of TOC; (b) artificial seawater solution with 2 mg L−1 of TOC; (c) artificial seawater solution with 3 mg L−1 of TOC; (d) West Sea water (1.3 mg L−1 of TOC).
      Figure 3. Free chlorine decay curves in seawater with different TOC and initial chlorine concentration. Each line represents the predicted concentration of chlorine under a given condition. (a) Artificial seawater solution with 1 mg L−1 of TOC; (b) artificial seawater solution with 2 mg L−1 of TOC; (c) artificial seawater solution with 3 mg L−1 of TOC; (d) West Sea water (1.3 mg L−1 of TOC).
      Figure 4. Correlation between model and experimental data in the chlorine kinetics using seawater.
      Figure 4. Correlation between model and experimental data in the chlorine kinetics using seawater.
      Figure 5. Free chlorine concentrations in West Sea water under different current conditions in an insitu electro-chlorination system.
      Figure 5. Free chlorine concentrations in West Sea water under different current conditions in an insitu electro-chlorination system.
      Figure 6. Free chlorine distribution along the sampling ports under different flow rates. Each dot represents experimental data, and each point on the black line is the expected chlorine concentration obtained from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation with a parallel first-order decay model. The red-dotted line is the desirable concentration at the given flow rate: (a) 600 L min−1 of flow rate, (b) 700 L min−1 of flow rate, (c) 800 L min−1 of flow rate, (d) 900 L min−1 of flow rate.
      Figure 6. Free chlorine distribution along the sampling ports under different flow rates. Each dot represents experimental data, and each point on the black line is the expected chlorine concentration obtained from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation with a parallel first-order decay model. The red-dotted line is the desirable concentration at the given flow rate: (a) 600 L min−1 of flow rate, (b) 700 L min−1 of flow rate, (c) 800 L min−1 of flow rate, (d) 900 L min−1 of flow rate.
      Figure 7. Fluid contour images from CFD simulation of the electro-chlorination experiment. Inlet flow rate is 800 L min−1. Outlet pressure was set to 10.8 kPa. (a) Chlorine concentration; (b) expanded view of electrode side in image (a); (c) velocity magnitude; (d) pressure.
      Figure 7. Fluid contour images from CFD simulation of the electro-chlorination experiment. Inlet flow rate is 800 L min−1. Outlet pressure was set to 10.8 kPa. (a) Chlorine concentration; (b) expanded view of electrode side in image (a); (c) velocity magnitude; (d) pressure.
      Figure 8. Chlorine concentration contour in the simulation of full-scale in-situ electro-chlorination with different cathode positions. The pipe diameter is 2 m and the flow rate is 14 m3 s−1. The figure shows 10 m of the pipeline. (a) The simulation result when the cathode is placed on the surface of the pipe wall. (b) The simulation result when the cathode is placed on the inside of the pipe with 100 mm of distance from the pipe wall.
      Figure 8. Chlorine concentration contour in the simulation of full-scale in-situ electro-chlorination with different cathode positions. The pipe diameter is 2 m and the flow rate is 14 m3 s−1. The figure shows 10 m of the pipeline. (a) The simulation result when the cathode is placed on the surface of the pipe wall. (b) The simulation result when the cathode is placed on the inside of the pipe with 100 mm of distance from the pipe wall.
      Figure 9. Comparison of in-situ electro-chlorination and direct chlorine injection in full-scale applications. (a) Estimated chlorine concentrations along the pipe surface. (b) Relative chlorine demands.
      Figure 9. Comparison of in-situ electro-chlorination and direct chlorine injection in full-scale applications. (a) Estimated chlorine concentrations along the pipe surface. (b) Relative chlorine demands.

      References

      1. Macknick, J.; Newmark, R.; Heath, G.; Hallett, K.C. Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: A review of existing literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 045802.
      2. Pan, S.-Y.; Snyder, S.W.; Packman, A.I.; Lin, Y.J.; Chiang, P.-C. Cooling water use in thermoelectric power generation and its associated challenges for addressing water-energy nexus. Water-Energy Nexus 2018, 1, 26–41.
      3. Feeley, T.J., III; Skone, T.J.; Stiegel, G.J., Jr.; McNemar, A.; Nemeth, M.; Schimmoller, B.; Murphy, J.T.;
        Manfredo, L. Water: A critical resource in the thermoelectric power industry. Energy 2008, 33, 1–11.
      4. World Nuclear Association. World Nuclear Performance Report 2016; World Nuclear Association: London, UK, 2016.
      5. Pugh, S.; Hewitt, G.; Müller-Steinhagen, H. Fouling during the use of seawater as coolant—The development of a user guide. Heat Transf. Eng. 2005, 26, 35–43.
      6. Satpathy, K.K.; Mohanty, A.K.; Sahu, G.; Biswas, S.; Prasad, M.; Slvanayagam, M. Biofouling and its control in seawater cooled power plant cooling water system—A review. Nucl. Power 2010, 17, 191–242.
      7. Cristiani, P.; Perboni, G. Antifouling strategies and corrosion control in cooling circuits. Bioelectrochemistry 2014, 97, 120–126.
      8. Walker, M.E.; Safari, I.; Theregowda, R.B.; Hsieh, M.-K.; Abbasian, J.; Arastoopour, H.; Dzombak, D.A.; Miller, D.C. Economic impact of condenser fouling in existing thermoelectric power plants. Energy 2012,44, 429–437.
      9. Yi, J.; Ahn, Y.; Hong, M.; Kim, G.-H.; Shabnam, N.; Jeon, B.; Sang, B.-I.; Kim, H. Comparison between OCl−-Injection and In Situ Electrochlorination in the Formation of Chlorate and Perchlorate in Seawater. Appl.Sci. 2019, 9, 229.
      10. Xue, Y.; Zhao, J.; Qiu, R.; Zheng, J.; Lin, C.; Ma, B.; Wang, P. In Situ glass antifouling using Pt nanoparticle coating for periodic electrolysis of seawater. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 357, 60–68.
      11. Mahfouz, A.B.; Atilhan, S.; Batchelor, B.; Linke, P.; Abdel-Wahab, A.; El-Halwagi, M.M. Optimal scheduling of biocide dosing for seawater-cooled power and desalination plants. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2011, 13, 783–796.
      12. Rubio, D.; López-Galindo, C.; Casanueva, J.F.; Nebot, E. Monitoring and assessment of an industrial antifouling treatment. Seasonal effects and influence of water velocity in an open once-through seawater cooling system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 67, 378–387.
      13. European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Bureau, European Commission. Reference Document on the Application of Best Available Techniques to Industrial Cooling Systems December 2001; European Commission, Tech. Rep: Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
      14. Venkatesan R.; Murthy P. S. Macrofouling Control in Power Plants. In Springer Series on Biofilms; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008.
      15. Kastl, G.; Fisher, I.; Jegatheesan, V. Evaluation of chlorine decay kinetics expressions for drinking water distribution systems modelling. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 1999, 48, 219–226.
      16. Fisher, I.; Kastl, G.; Sathasivan, A.; Cook, D.; Seneverathne, L. General model of chlorine decay in blends of surface waters, desalinated water, and groundwaters. J. Environ. Eng. 2015, 141, 04015039.
      17. Fisher, I.; Kastl, G.; Sathasivan, A.; Jegatheesan, V. Suitability of chlorine bulk decay models for planning and management of water distribution systems. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 41, 1843–1882.
      18. Fisher, I.; Kastl, G.; Sathasivan, A. Evaluation of suitable chlorine bulk-decay models for water distribution systems. Water Res. 2011, 45, 4896–4908.
      19. Haas, C.N.; Karra, S. Kinetics of wastewater chlorine demand exertion. J. (Water Pollut. Control Fed.) 1984, 56, 170–173.
      20. Zeng, J.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, Q.; Zheng, P.; Huang, Y. The decay kinetics of residual chlorine in cooling seawater simulation experiments. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2009, 28, 54–59.
      21. Saeed, S.; Prakash, S.; Deb, N.; Campbell, R.; Kolluru, V.; Febbo, E.; Dupont, J. Development of a sitespecific kinetic model for chlorine decay and the formation of chlorination by-products in seawater. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2015, 3, 772–792.
      22. Al Heboos, S.; Licskó, I. Application and comparison of two chlorine decay models for predicting bulk chlorine residuals. Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 2017, 61, 7–13.
      23. Shadloo, M.S.; Oger, G.; Le Touzé, D. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for fluid flows, towards industrial applications: Motivations, current state, and challenges. Comput. Fluids 2016, 136, 11–34.
      24. Wols, B.; Hofman, J.; Uijttewaal, W.; Rietveld, L.; Van Dijk, J. Evaluation of different disinfection calculation methods using CFD. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25, 573–582.
      25. Angeloudis, A.; Stoesser, T.; Falconer, R.A. Predicting the disinfection efficiency range in chlorine contact tanks through a CFD-based approach. Water Res. 2014, 60, 118–129.
      26. Zhang, J.; Tejada-Martínez, A.E.; Zhang, Q. Developments in computational fluid dynamics-based modeling for disinfection technologies over the last two decades: A review. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 58,71–85.
      27. Lim, Y.H.; Deering, D.D. In Modeling Chlorine Residual in a Ground Water Supply Tank for a Small Community in Cold Conditions, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2017; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, Virginia, USA, 2017; pp. 124–138.
      28. Hernández-Cervantes, D.; Delgado-Galván, X.; Nava, J.L.; López-Jiménez, P.A.; Rosales, M.; Mora Rodríguez, J. Validation of a computational fluid dynamics model for a novel residence time distribution analysis in mixing at cross-junctions. Water 2018, 10, 733.
      29. Hua, F.; West, J.; Barker, R.; Forster, C. Modelling of chlorine decay in municipal water supplies. Water Res. 1999, 33, 2735–2746.
      30. Jonkergouw, P.M.; Khu, S.-T.; Savic, D.A.; Zhong, D.; Hou, X.Q.; Zhao, H.-B. A variable rate coefficient chlorine decay model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 408–414.
      31. Nejjari, F.; Puig, V.; Pérez, R.; Quevedo, J.; Cugueró, M.; Sanz, G.; Mirats, J. Chlorine decay model calibration and comparison: Application to a real water network. Procedia Eng. 2014, 70, 1221–1230.
      32. Kohpaei, A.J.; Sathasivan, A.; Aboutalebi, H. Effectiveness of parallel second order model over second and first order models. Desalin. Water Treat. 2011, 32, 107–114.
      33. Powell, J.C.; Hallam, N.B.; West, J.R.; Forster, C.F.; Simms, J. Factors which control bulk chlorine decay rates. Water Res. 2000, 34, 117–126.
      34. Clark, R.M.; Sivaganesan, M. Predicting chlorine residuals in drinking water: Second order model. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2002, 128, 152–161.
      35. Li, X.; Li, C.; Bayier, M.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, T.; Chen, X.; Mao, X. Desalinated seawater into pilot-scale drinking water distribution system: Chlorine decay and trihalomethanes formation. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57,19149–19159.
      36. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Chlorine, Total Residual (Spectrophotometric, DPD); EPA-NERL: 330.5; EPA: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1978.
      37. Polman, H.; Verhaart, F.; Bruijs, M. Impact of biofouling in intake pipes on the hydraulics and efficiency of pumping capacity. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51, 997–1003.
      38. Rajagopal, S.; Van der Velde, G.; Van der Gaag, M.; Jenner, H.A. How effective is intermittent chlorination to control adult mussel fouling in cooling water systems? Water Res. 2003, 37, 329–338.
      39. Bruijs, M.C.; Venhuis, L.P.; Daal, L. Global Experiences in Optimizing Biofouling Control through PulseChlorination®. 2017. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318561645_Global_Experiences_in_Optimizing_Biofouling_Co ntrol_through_Pulse-ChlorinationR (accessed on 1 May 2020).
      40. Kim, H.; Hao, O.J.; McAvoy, T.J. Comparison between model-and pH/ORP-based process control for an AAA system. Tamkang J. Sci. Eng. 2000, 3, 165–172.
      41. Brdys, M.; Chang, T.; Duzinkiewicz, K. Intelligent Model Predictive Control of Chlorine Residuals in Water Distribution Systems, Bridging the Gap: Meeting the World’s Water and Environmental Resources Challenges. In Proceedings of the ASCE Water Resource Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, July 30–August 2, 2000; pp. 1–11
      Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)

      2상 유동 해석을 통한 슈트 폭기 시스템 효율에 대한 램프 각도의 영향 조사

      1 Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, Iran

      2 Instructor in Civil Engineering Department Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful,Iran.

       10.22055/JISE.2021.37743.1980

      Abstract

      슈트 여수로의 흐름 폭기는 캐비테이션 손상을 방지하는 가장 효과적이고 경제적인 방법 중 하나입니다. 수중 프리즘에 아주 작은 양의 공기가 흩어지면 표면 손상이 크게 줄어듭니다. 이를 위해 폭기 장치로 알려진 구조를 사용할 수 있습니다. 또한, 램프 각도는 폭기 효율에 영향을 미치는 요인 중 하나입니다. 이 연구에서는 Flow-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 3가지 다른 시나리오인 6, 8 및 10도의 램프 각도에서 Jarreh 댐의 방수로를 통해 흐름을 동반하는 공기의 값을 시뮬레이션했습니다. 6도의 경사각에서 유동 유체로 유입되는 공기의 결과를 검증하기 위해이란 TAMAB Company의 실험실에서 댐 방수로 물리적 모델의 관찰 결과를 사용했습니다. 결과에 따르면 램프 각도를 높이면 워터제트 기저귀로 유입되는 공기가 증가하고 10도 램프 각도는 최고의 폭기 효율을 제공합니다. Flow-3D 모델은 결과에 따라 여수로의 2단계 물-공기 흐름을 시뮬레이션할 수도 있습니다.

      Flow aeration in chute spillway is one of the most effective and economic ways to prevent cavitation damage. Surface damage is significantly reduced when very small values of air are scattered in a water prism. A structure known as an aerator may be used for this purpose. Besides, ramp angle is one of the factors influencing aerator efficiency. In this research, the value of air entraining the flow through the Jarreh Dam’s spillway at the ramp angles of 6, 8 and 10 degrees, as three different scenarios, was simulated using the Flow-3D software. In order to validate the results of the inlet air into the flowing fluid at a ramp angle of 6 degrees, the observational results of the dam spillway physical model from the laboratory of TAMAB Company in Iran were used. According to the results, raising the ramp angle increases the inlet air to the water jet nappe, and a ten-degree ramp angle provides the best aeration efficiency. The Flow-3D model can also simulate the two-phase water-air flow on spillways, according to the results.

      Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators
      Fig. 1- Schematic of the general pattern of flow and aeration process in the aerators
      Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)
      Fig. 2- Experimental setup (Shamloo et al., 2012)
      Fig. 3- Results of numerical model validation in determining a) mean flow depth, b) mean velocity, and c) static pressure in various discharges vs (Shamloo et al., 2012) research under a 6 degree ramp angle
      Fig. 3- Results of numerical model validation in determining a) mean flow depth, b) mean velocity, and c) static pressure in various discharges vs (Shamloo et al., 2012) research under a 6 degree ramp angle
      Fig. 4- Location of data extraction stations after aeration on a scale model of 1:50
      Fig. 4- Location of data extraction stations after aeration on a scale model of 1:50
      Fig.7- Changes in cavitation index in different discharges with changes in ramp angle: a) 6 degrees, b) 8 degrees and c) 10 degrees
      Fig.7- Changes in cavitation index in different discharges with changes in ramp angle: a) 6 degrees, b) 8 degrees and c) 10 degrees

      Keywords

      Aeration system Ramp angle Aeration coefficient Two-phase flow Flow-3D model

      참고문헌

      • Baharvand, S., & Lashkar-Ara, B. (2021). 실험 모델과 CFD 모델을 결합한 수정 사행 C형 어로의 수력학적 설계기준. 생태 공학 , 164 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106207

      2- Bayon, A., Toro, JP, Bombardelli, FA, Matos, J., & López-Jiménez, PA(2018). VOF 기술, 난류 모델 및 이산화 방식이 계단식 배수로에서 폭기되지 않은 스키밍 흐름의 수치 시뮬레이션에 미치는 영향. 수력 환경 연구 저널 , 19 , 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.002

      3- Brethour, JM, & Hirt, CW (2009). 2성분 흐름에 대한 드리프트 모델. Flow Science, Inc. , FSI – 09 – TN83Rev , 1–7.

      4- Chanson, H. (1989). 공기 유입 및 폭기 장치 연구. 수력학 연구 저널 , 27 (3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688909499166

      5- Dong, Z., Wang, J., Vetsch, DF, Boes, RM, & Tan, G. (2019). 매우 높은 단위 배출에서 X자형 플레어링 게이트 교각 뒤의 계단식 배수로에서 공기-물 2상 흐름의 수치 시뮬레이션. 물(스위스) , 11 (10). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101956

      6- Flow-3D, V. 11. 2. (2017). 사용자 매뉴얼. Flow Science Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA;

      7- Hirt, CW (2003). 자유 표면에서 공기의 난류 동반 모델링. Flow Science, Inc. , FSI – 03 – TN6 , 1–9.

      8- Hirt, CW (2016). 드리프트 플럭스에 대한 동적 액적 크기. Flow Science, Inc. , 1–10.

      9- Hirt, CW, & Nichols, BD (1981). 자유 경계의 역학에 대한 VOF(유체 체적) 방법. 전산 물리학 저널 , 39 (1), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5

      10- Kherbache, K., Chesneau, X., Zeghmati, B., Abide, S., & Benmamar, S. (2017). 계단식 배수로의 물 흐름에 대한 계단식 경사 및 공기 주입의 영향: 수치 연구. 유체 역학 저널 , 29 (2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60742-4

      11- Kramer, M., & Chanson, H. (2019). 폭기된 여수로 흐름에서 광학 흐름 추정: 샘플링 매개변수에 대한 필터링 및 논의. 실험적 열 및 유체 과학 , 103 , 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.12.002

      12- Mahmoudian, Z., Baharvand, S., & Lashkarara, B. (2019). Baffle Fishway Denil Type의 흐름 패턴 조사. 관개 과학 및 공학(JISE) , 42 (3), 179–196.

      13- Meireles, IC, Bombardelli, FA 및 Matos, J. (2014). 가파른 계단식 배수로의 스키밍 흐름에서 공기 유입 시작: 분석. 수력학 연구 저널 , 52 (3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2013.878401

      14- Parsaie, A., & Haghiabi, AH (2019). 1/4 원형 볏이 있는 계단식 배수로에서 흐름 폭기의 시작 지점. 유량 측정 및 계측 , 69 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101618

      15- Richardson, JF, & Zaki W N. (1979). 침전 및 유동화. 파트 1. 트랜스. Inst. 화학 영어 , 32 , 35–53.

      16- Shamloo, H., Hoseini Ghafari, S., & Kavianpour, M. (2012). 슈트 여수로의 폭기에 대한 유입구 흐름의 영향에 대한 실험적 연구(사례 연구: 이란 Jare Dam). 제10차 토목 공학 발전에 관한 국제 회의, 중동 기술 대학, 앙카라, 터키 .

      17- Wang, SY, Hou, DM, & Wang, CH (2012). Murum 수력 발전소의 계단식 슈트의 폭기 장치. 프로시디아 엔지니어링 , 28 , 803–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.813.

      18- Wei, W., Deng, J., & Zhang, F. (2016). 초임계 슈트 흐름에 대한 자체 폭기 공정 개발. 다상 흐름의 국제 저널 , 79 , 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.11.003

      19- Wu, J., QIAN, S., & MA, F. (2016). 스키점프 스텝 배수로의 새로운 디자인. 유체 역학 저널 , 05 , 914–917.

      20- Xu, Y., Wang, W., Yong, H., & Zhao, W. (2012). 슈트 폭기 장치에서 제트 흐름의 공동 역류에 대한 조사. 프로시디아 엔지니어링 , 31 , 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.989

      21- Yakhot, V., & Orszag, SA (1986). 난류의 재정규화 그룹 분석. I. 기본 이론. 과학 컴퓨팅 저널 , 1 (1), 3–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061452

      22- Yang, J., Teng, P., & Lin, C. (2019). 넓은 여수로 폭기장치의 통풍구 배치 및 물-기류 거동. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters , 9 (2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2019.02.009

      23- Zhang, G., & Chanson, H. (2016). 자유 표면 폭기와 계단식 슈트의 총 압력 사이의 상호 작용. 실험적 열 및 유체 과학 , 74 , 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.12.011

      Fig 2(b) Observed velocity field for aspect ratio 0.25(Sukhodolov 2002)

      고정 베드의 불침투성 토양에서 흐름 패턴의 수치 시뮬레이션

      NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FLOW PATTERN IN SERIES OF IMPERMEABLE GROYNES IN FIXED BED

      Kafle, Mukesh Raj1
      1Asst. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Nepal
      Email: mkafle@pcampus.edu.np

      Abstract

      This paper presents a numerical simulation of recirculating flow patterns in groyne fields. Moreover, it entails the concept determination of proper spacing of vertical unsubmerged and impermeable groynesin seriesto control the bank erosion. Flow pattern between the groynes varies along their space. The flow in groyne field may significantly affect the flow change, bed change, bank erosion and condition of habitat. In this regard, an assessment of flow along the space of groynes will yield important data needed to diversify the object of groyne installation. So, knowledge about determination of the proper spacing of groynes in groyne field is important. Space of vertical groynes was set from 1.5 to 10 times the length of groynes. The velocity field between groynes was simulated by using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model Nays 2D. Simulated velocity field was compared with existing experimentaldata for the same parameter, which agreed satisfactorily. Based on simulated results,the optimal spacing of vertical groynes to control the bank erosion was recommended.

      이 논문은 groyne 필드에서 재순환 흐름 패턴의 수치 시뮬레이션을 제공합니다. 더욱이, 그것은 제방 침식을 제어하기 위해 수직 비침수 및 불침투성 그로이네신 시리즈의 적절한 간격의 개념 결정을 수반합니다. groynes 사이의 흐름 패턴은 공간에 따라 다릅니다. groyne field의 흐름은 흐름 변화, 하상 변화, 제방 침식 및 서식지 상태에 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 이와 관련하여, groyne 공간을 따른 흐름의 평가는 groyne 설치 대상을 다양화하는 데 필요한 중요한 데이터를 산출할 것입니다. 따라서, groyne field에서 groyne의 적절한 간격 결정에 대한 지식이 중요합니다. 수직 여백의 간격은 여아 길이의 1.5배에서 10배 사이로 설정하였다. groyne 사이의 속도장은 CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics) 모델 Nays 2D를 사용하여 시뮬레이션되었습니다. 시뮬레이션된 속도장은 동일한 매개변수에 대해 기존 실험 데이터와 비교되었으며 만족스럽게 일치했습니다. 모의 결과를 바탕으로 제방 침식을 억제하기 위한 최적의 수직 제방 간격을 제안하였다.

      1. Introduction
        Spur dikes or groynes are used to protect river banks from erosion and also keep the channel
        navigable.Depending upon the flow characteristics, spur-dikes may be classified as submerged and unsubmerged. Also, based on the permeability, spur dikes are further classified as permeable and
        impermeable. Herein, un-submerged !impermeable spur dikes are dealt. These structures are built from the river bank into the stream flow and usually built in group. Construction of groyne against the flow causes significant changes in flow pattern in channel. Those changes may result in scour phenomenon around groynes which may lead structure instability and changes in river morphology. Moreover, in series of groynes, spacing of groynes leads different types of recirculating flow patterns.Therefore, investigating the characteristics of flow pattern around groynes have been a great interest in river engineering. Numerous researchers like Sukhodolov et al. (2002), Hao Zhang et al.(2009), Beheshti (2010), Duan (2009), Naji(2010), Karami(2011) made a variety of experiments in order to determine the flow pattern around groynes. Most of these researchers studied effect of single groyne, while using series of groynes is more effective in protection of rivers. Besides experimental studies, variety of CFD models have been developed for computing flow pattern around hydraulic structures; like Fluent, Flow 3D, Nays 2D, Nays CUBE and SSIIM. In this study, Nays 2D numerical modelling has been used to investigate flow and recirculating pattern around a series of groynes and streamlines including components of velocities.
      1. Flow pattern in groyne fields
        Under conditions where the groynes are not submerged, the groyne fields are not really part of the wetted cross section of a river. Because of that, the flow pattern in the groyne-field is not directly the result of the discharge in the main channel. Reducing the main stream velocity has no effect on the flow pattern itself, whereas lowering the water level does (Uijttewaal et al.2001). Moreover, the flow pattern inside a groyne field may change with the change of its geometry, location along the river (inner curve, outer curve, or straight part), and/ or the groynes orientation( Przedwojski et al.1995). However, there is an indirect effect of the discharge on the flow pattern in the groyne field. Because of the flow that is diverted from the main channel into the groyne fields, water flows into the groyne field with low velocity through the downstream half of the interfacial section between the groyne field and the main channel. This water flows back to the main channel through a small width of, just downstream the upstream groyne of the groyne field ( Termes et al.1991). Flow separates on a groyne head and forms a secondary flow represented by a large scale vortex with a vertical axis of rotation called primary gyre. Deflection of the flow inside the groyne field by banks and upstream groynes leads to the development of a secondary gyre with an opposite direction of rotation to the primary gyre. Location, mutual interactions, and energy exchange between gyres are the factors that create a specific recirculation pattern, and, consequently assuming correspondence with sedimentation processes, they define deposition patterns.
      2. Model Formulation
        The CFD model selected for this study is the publically available software NAYS 2D (iRIC 2.0), which is an analytical solver for calculation of unsteady two-dimensional plane flow and riverbed deformation using boundary-fitted coordinates within general curvilinear coordinates. A numerical channel of length 8.0m and width 0.9m was created with grid size of 0.01m im stream wise and 0.03m in cross stream directions. Groynes or spur dikes of length 0.15 and width 0.01m were chosen in series. Groyne field with various aspect ratio (b/x) 0.7, 0.25, 0.17, 0.125 and 0.10, where b=length of spur dike, x=spacing of two dikes. Discharge of 0.0175 m3 /s was applied. For boundary conditions, water surface at downstream and velocity at upstream were considered as uniform flow. Relaxation coefficient for water surface calculation was considered as 0.8. For the finite-difference method, the CIP method was applied to the advection terms in equations of motion. For the turbulent field calculation, Constant eddy viscosity, Zero-equation model and k-G models were applied and compared. The model!s accuracy in predicting the velocity magnitudes is evaluated using statistical parameters- mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error(MSE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The comparison of results shows the importance of selecting an appropriate turbulence model in simulating flow field around a spur dike. From the comparison, k-I model is found superior over zero energy model and eddy viscosity model. So, k-I model is chosen as appropriate turbulence closure model.
      3. Model!s Validation
        The capability of CFD model Nays 2D to simulate the velocity field and recirculation pattern in groyne field was compared with experimental data of laboratory experiments by Sukhodolov et al. (2002). The numerical simulation was validated for aspect ratio (R=b/x=0.7) and R=0.25. For aspect ratio R=0.7, one gyre system occupies the whole area of the groyne field. The areas with lower-than-average velocity values are clearly seen in the central part of the gyre and near its corners. Velocities increase towards the margins of the gyre. For aspect ratio R=0.25, two gyre velocity fields were observed in the groyne field. In the downstream part of the groyne field a large gyre, covering two-thirds of the area is clearly visible. The left part(upstream) contains second gyre rotating much more slowly and in the direction opposed to the primary gyre. The simulated and observed velocity field pattern and gyre found satisfactorily agreed. Now, after validation, the model was used for further analysis of velocity field for various aspect ratios.
      Fig 2(b) Observed velocity field for aspect ratio 0.25(Sukhodolov 2002)
      Fig 2(b) Observed velocity field for aspect ratio 0.25(Sukhodolov 2002)
      1. Results and Discussions
        The calibrated model was applied to five different cases of un-submerged and impermeable groyne fields with aspect ratios R=0.70,0.25,0.17,0.125 & 0.10 and flow pattern was numerically simulated. For aspect ratio R=0.7 i.e x/b=1.5, Fig 1(a) only one lateral primary gyre was formed inside the groyne field. The circulation pattern in this case is distinguished by the main flow that is deflected outside the groyne field. The developed primary gyre prevents the main flow from penetrating the groyne field. Therefore, this pattern is desirable for navigation purposes as a continuous deep channel is maintained along the face of the groyne field. Simulated velocity pattern satisfactorily agrees with the observed velocity field Fig 1(b) for the same aspect ratio by Sukhodolov (2002). The spacing of the groyne was further increased maintaining aspect ratio R= 0.25 i. e x/b=4 Fig 2(a) and flow pattern inside the groyne field was simulated. In this case, in the downstream part of the groyne field, a primary gyre occupying almost two-third area was formed. In addition, deflection of the flow inside the groyne field by banks and upstream groynes leads to the development of a secondary gyre with an opposite direction of rotation to the primary gyre covering almost one-third part of the groyne field. Likewise in the first case, the main current is maintained deflected outside the groyne field. Simulated velocity pattern satisfactorily agrees with the observed velocity field Fig 2(b) for the same aspect ratio by Sukhodolov (2002). The spacing of the groyne was further increased maintaining aspect ratio R=0.17 i.e x/b=6. In this case the flow pattern was similar to the aspect ratio R=0.25. The spacing of the groynes was further increased maintaining aspect ratio R=0.125 i. e x/b=8. In this case, similar to the previous scenarios two longitudinal gyres but with different positions are formed. The main current is directed in to the groyne field (Fig 3) creating a much more stronger eddy near the upstream groyne and greater turbulence along the upstream face and at the groyne lower head. As the spacing between groynes increased maintaining aspect ratio R=0.10 i. e x/b=10 (Fig 4), still primary and secondary gyres are generated. The formed gyres deflect the main flow thus preventing to enter in to the groyne field in upstream part. However, in the downstream of the primary gyre and just upstream of the second groyne, the flow attacks the bank directly. The resultant velocity profiles at the deflected region y/b=3 were plotted and how the spacing of second groyne affect the result was analyzed. Spacing of groynes makes little change in upstream resultant velocity. However, in the deflected region, its effect is significant. Higher value of spacing of groyne leads higher average deviation in resultant velocity. For aspect ratio R=0.7, the average deviation estimated as 0.02%. In the case of aspect ratio R=0.25, this value was reached to 1.57%. Further increment of spacing i. e decreasing the aspect ratio R=0.17, average deviation was found 3.82%. For the aspect ratio R=0.125, that value was estimated as 4.16%.
      2. Conclusions
        Geometry of the groyne fields; width and length of the groyne field mainly cause the specific flow patterns including number and shape of eddies or gyres. Eddies developed inside the groyne field deflects the main flow preventing it entering into the dead zone. An aspect ratio close to unity gives rise to a single eddy. A smaller aspect ratio (higher spacing between groynes) gives room to two stationary eddies, a large one called primary eddy, in the downstream part of the groyne field, and a smaller secondary eddy emerges near the upstream groyne. The extreme long groyne field -case of length to width ratio of larger thaneight shows penetration of main flow into the groyne field. The two eddies remain in a relatively stable position, while the main flow zone starts to penetrate into groyne field further downstream. In all cases, there is an eddy detaches from the upstream groyne tip that travels along the main channel groyne field interface and eventually merges with the primary eddy. The simulated results indicate that the spacing of groynes or spur dikes from the controlling of bank erosion point of view should be limited within six times the length of groyne.
      Fig 3 Computed velocity field for aspect ratio 0.125
      Fig 3 Computed velocity field for aspect ratio 0.125
      Fig 4 Computed velocity field for aspect ratio 0.10
      Fig 4 Computed velocity field for aspect ratio 0.10
      Fig 5 Resultant velocity profiles at y/b=3
      Fig 5 Resultant velocity profiles at y/b=3
      Fig 5 Resultant velocity profiles at y/b=3
      Fig 5 Resultant velocity profiles at y/b=3

      References

      1. Holtz, K.P  Numerical simulation of recirculating flow at groynes.Å Computer Methods in Water Resources, Vol 2, No 2 (1991).
      2. Hossein, Bassar; Abdollah, Ardeshir; Hojat, Karami.  Numerical simulation of flow pattern around spur dikes series in rigid bed.Å 9th international congress on civil engineering, May 8- 10,2012, Isfahan University of Technology (IUT) , Isfahan, Iran (2012).
      3. Kang, J.G; Yeo, H.K; Kim,S.J An experimental study on a characteristics of flow around groyne area by install conditions.Å www.SciRP.org/journal/eng(2012).
      4. Shimizu,Y; Nelson,JIntroduction of Nays solver in iRIC.Åwww.i-ric.org(2012).
      5. Sukhodolov, A. Uijttewaal, W. S. J., and Engelhardt, C. On the correspondence between morphological and hydro dynamical patterns of groyne fields.Å Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 27(3) (2002).
      6. Uijttewall, W.S.J; Lehman,D; VanMazijk,A.  Exchange process between a river and its groyne fields-model experiments.Å Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 127(11) (2001).
      7. Uijttewall, W.S.J Groyne field velocity patterns determined with particle tracking
        velocimetryÅ.28th IAHR congress, Graz, Austria (1999).
      8. Yossef, Mohamed  Flow details near groynes: Experimental investigations.Å Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 137 (2011).
      Figura 4.5 – Superfície de contorno de velocidades a 3,9 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.

      전기톱 절단 시험실에서 배기 시스템의 CFD 시뮬레이션

      CFD Simulation of an exhaust system in chainsaw cutting test room

      Área de Concentração: Energia e Fenômenos de Transporte
      Orientador: Prof. Diogo Elias da Vinha Andrade
      Comissão de Avaliação:
      Profa
      . Letícia Jenisch Rodrigues
      Prof. Francis Henrique Ramos França
      Prof. Paulo Smith Schneider

      Abstract

      The objective of the present work is to improve an exhaust system for a chain saw
      cutting test room through a fluid dynamic computational simulation (CFD). The purpose of the
      designed system is to remove combustion gases, such as carbon monoxide (CO), which is
      extremely toxic, colourless and inodorous. The current system consists of a set of exhaust fans,
      a hood and an insufflation set. From experimental tests, the input data of the simulation were
      collected to define the variables and boundary conditions such as volumetric flow of CO, its
      temperature and density and the supply of fresh air in the room. The necessary means of
      instrumentation are presented so that it is possible to obtain the correlation with the results of
      the simulation and, once validated, a study of mesh refinement was carried out. With this, the
      possible solutions to the problem are evaluated through a case study involving the geometry of
      the hood and the exhaust and insufflation systems. By changing the hood geometry, the most
      satisfactory result was obtained for the problem, as it was shown to be able to remove all CO
      from the room, respecting the proposed operational limits.

      현재 연구의 목적은 유체 역학 계산 시뮬레이션(CFD)을 통해 체인 톱 절단 시험실의 배기 시스템을 개선하는 것입니다. 설계된 시스템의 목적은 매우 유독하고 무색이며 냄새가 나는 일산화탄소(CO)와 같은 연소 가스를 제거하는 것입니다. 현재 시스템은 배기 팬 세트, 후드 및 흡입 세트로 구성됩니다. 실험 테스트에서 시뮬레이션의 입력 데이터는 CO의 체적 유량, 온도 및 밀도, 실내의 신선한 공기 공급과 같은 변수 및 경계 조건을 정의하기 위해 수집되었습니다. 시뮬레이션 결과와의 상관관계를 얻을 수 있도록 필요한 계측 수단을 제시하고 검증 후 메쉬 미세화 연구를 수행했습니다. 이를 통해 후드의 기하학적 구조와 배기 및 흡입 시스템과 관련된 사례 연구를 통해 문제에 대한 가능한 솔루션을 평가합니다. 후드 형상을 변경함으로써 제안된 작동 한계를 준수하면서 실내에서 모든 CO를 제거할 수 있는 것으로 나타났기 때문에 문제에 대해 가장 만족스러운 결과를 얻었습니다.

      Keywords

      carbon monoxide, exhaust system, CFD simulation.

      Figura 3.2 – Geometria simplificada da sala de testes da primeira versão.
      Figura 3.2 – Geometria simplificada da sala de testes da primeira versão.
      Figura 3.4 – Velocidade nos sensores de velocidade para verificar independência de malha para cada refino após 20 s do acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 3.4 – Velocidade nos sensores de velocidade para verificar independência de malha para cada refino após 20 s do acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 3.4 – Velocidade nos sensores de velocidade para verificar independência de malha para cada refino após 20 s do acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 3.4 – Velocidade nos sensores de velocidade para verificar independência de malha para cada refino após 20 s do acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 3.5 – Vista em detalhe da coifa e os elementos que a compõe.
      Figura 3.5 – Vista em detalhe da coifa e os elementos que a compõe.
      Figura 3.6 – Geometrias das versões simuladas do Teste de Casos.
      Figura 3.6 – Geometrias das versões simuladas do Teste de Casos.
      Figura 4.1 – Concentração de CO medida pelos sensores da simulação.
      Figura 4.1 – Concentração de CO medida pelos sensores da simulação.
      Figura 4.2 – Plano indicando os três cortes realizados na simulação para as superfícies de contorno sendo (1) a altura do escape da máquina, (2) a altura dos detectores de CO e (3) a altura dos exaustores
      Figura 4.2 – Plano indicando os três cortes realizados na simulação para as superfícies de contorno sendo (1) a altura do escape da máquina, (2) a altura dos detectores de CO e (3) a altura dos exaustores
      Figura 4.3 – Superfície de contorno de velocidades a 1,3 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.3 – Superfície de contorno de velocidades a 1,3 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.4 – Superfície de contorno de velocidades a 1,5 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.4 – Superfície de contorno de velocidades a 1,5 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.5 – Superfície de contorno de velocidades a 3,9 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.5 – Superfície de contorno de velocidades a 3,9 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.6 – Superfície de contorno de massas específicas a 1,3 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.6 – Superfície de contorno de massas específicas a 1,3 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.7 – Superfície de contorno de massas específicas a 1,5 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.7 – Superfície de contorno de massas específicas a 1,5 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.8 – Superfície de contorno de massas específicas a 3,9 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.8 – Superfície de contorno de massas específicas a 3,9 m do piso após 20 s de acionamento da motosserra.
      Figura 4.9 – Volume total de monóxido ao longo do tempo na sala.
      Figura 4.9 – Volume total de monóxido ao longo do tempo na sala.
      Figura 4.9 – Vazão volumétrica de CO ao longo do tempo através da superfície de controle. As linhas contínuas representam curvas de ajuste aos dados simulados.
      Figura 4.9 – Vazão volumétrica de CO ao longo do tempo através da superfície de controle. As linhas contínuas representam curvas de ajuste aos dados simulados.

      REFERENCIAS

      CROWL, Daniel A.; LOUVAR, Joseph F. Chemical process safety: fundamentals with applications. Second Edition, Pearson Education, 2001. BURNETT, J.; CHAN, M. Y. Criteria for air quality in enclosed car parks. Em: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport. Thomas Telford-ICE Virtual Library, 1997. Disponível em: < http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/10.1680/itran.1997.29379> SITTISAK, P.; CHARINPANITKUL T.; CHALERMSINSUWAN, B. Enhancement of carbon monoxide removal in an underground car park using ventilation system with single and twin jet fans. Em: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. Volume 97, 2020. VERSTEEG, H.K.; MALALASEKERA, W. Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Second Edition, Pearson Education, 2007. BULIŃSKA, A.; POPIOŁEK, Z.; BULIŃSKI, Z.; Experimentally validated CFD analysis on sampling region determination of average indoor carbon dioxide concentration in occupied space. Em: Building and Environment. Volume 72, 2014. KARIMI, H.; RIAZI, B.; MOHHAMMADI, M. Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Simulation of Carbon Monoxide Distribution, a Case Study: Sayad Underground Tunnel in Tehran. Disponível em: YAKHOT, V.; ORSZAG, S. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. Journal of scientific computing, v. 1, n. 1, p. 3-51, 1986. VAN HOOFF, T.; BLOCKEN, B. CFD evaluation of natural ventilation of indoor environments by the concentration decay method: CO2 gas dispersion from a semi-enclosed stadium. Building and Environment, v. 61, p. 1-17, 2013. Disponível em: < https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132312003216> YANG, L., YE, M., HE, B. CFD simulation research on residential indoor air quality. Em Science of The Total Environment. Volume 472, 2014. Disponível em: < https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969713014228> Flow-3D. Flow-3D User’s Guide. Versão 12, 2020. LAUNDER, B. E. e SPALDING, D. B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Em Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 3, 1974. pp. 269-289 MALISKA, Clovis R. Transferência de Calor e Mecânica dos Fluidos Computacional: fundamentos e coordenadas generalizadas. Segunda Edição. Rio de Janeiro, LTC, 2004. ROACHE, P. J. Perspective: A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 116, 1994; 405-413.

      Computational Fluid Dynamics, 온실

      CFD 사용: 유압 구조 및 농업에서의 응용

      USO DE CFD COMO HERRAMIENTA PARA LA MODELACIÓN Y  PREDICCIÓN NUMÉRICA DE LOS FLUIDOS: APLICACIONES EN  ESTRUCTURAS HIDRÁULICAS Y AGRICULTURA

      Cruz Ernesto Aguilar-Rodriguez1*; Candido Ramirez-Ruiz2; Erick Dante Mattos Villarroel3 

      1Tecnológico Nacional de México/ITS de Los Reyes. Carretera Los Reyes-Jacona, Col. Libertad. 60300.  Los Reyes de Salgado, Michoacán. México. 

      ernesto.ar@losreyes.tecnm.mx – 3541013901 (*Autor de correspondencia) 

      2Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, UNAM. Cto. Exterior S/N, C.U., Coyoacán, 04510, Ciudad  de México. México.  3Riego y Drenaje. Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua. Paseo Cuauhnáhuac 8532, Progreso,  Jiutepec, Morelos, C.P. 62550. México.

      Abstract

      공학에서 유체의 거동은 설명하기에 광범위하고 복잡한 과정이며, 유체역학은 유체의 거동을 지배하는 방정식을 통해 유체 역학 현상을 분석할 수 있는 과학 분야이지만 이러한 방정식에는 전체 솔루션이 없습니다. . 전산유체역학(Computational Fluid Dynamics, 이하 CFD)은 수치적 기법을 통해 방정식의 해에 접근할 수 있는 도구로, 신뢰할 수 있는 계산 모델을 얻기 위해서는 물리적 모델의 실험 데이터로 평가해야 합니다. 수력구조물에서 선형 및 미로형 여수로에서 시뮬레이션을 수행하고 배출 시트의 거동과 현재의 폭기 조건을 분석했습니다. 침강기에서 유체의 특성화를 수행하고 필요한 특성에 따라 사체적, 피스톤 또는 혼합의 분수를 수정하는 것이 가능합니다. 농업에서는 온실 환경을 특성화하고 환경에 대한 재료의 디자인, 방향 및 유형 간의 관계를 찾는 데 사용할 수 있습니다. 발견된 가장 중요한 결과 중 온실의 길이와 설계가 환기율에 미칠 수 있는 영향으로 온실의 길이는 높이의 6배 미만인 것이 권장됩니다.

      키워드: Computational Fluid Dynamics, 온실,

      Spillway, Settler 기사: COMEII-21048 소개 

      CFD는 유체 운동 문제에 대한 수치적 솔루션을 얻어 수리학적 현상을 더 잘 이해할 수 있게 함으로써 공간 시각화를 가능하게 하는 수치 도구입니다. 예를 들어, 수력 공학에서 벤츄리(Xu, Gao, Zhao, & Wang, 2014) 워터 펌핑(ȘCHEAUA, 2016) 또는 개방 채널 적용( Wu et 알., 2000). 

      문헌 검토는 실험 연구에서 검증된 배수로의 흐름 거동에 대한 수리학적 분석을 위한 CFD 도구의 효율성을 보여줍니다. 이 검토는 둑의 흐름 거동에 대한 수리학적 분석을 위한 CFD의 효율성을 보여줍니다. Crookston et al. (2012)는 미로 여수로에 대해 Flow 3D로 테스트를 수행했으며, 배출 계수의 결과는 3%에서 7%까지 다양한 오류로 실험적으로 얻은 결과로 허용 가능했으며 연구 결과 측면에 저압 영역이 있음을 발견했습니다. 익사 방식으로 작업할 때 위어의 벽. Zuhair(2013)는 수치 모델링 결과를 Mandali weir 원형의 실험 데이터와 비교했습니다.  

      최근 연구에서는 다양한 난류 모델을 사용하여 CFD를 적용할 가능성이 있음을 보여주었습니다. 그리고 일부만이 음용수 처리를 위한 침적자의 사례 연구를 제시했으며, 다른 설계 변수 중에서 기하학적인 대안, 수온 변화 등을 제안했습니다. 따라서 기술 개발로 인해 설계 엔지니어가 유체 거동을 분석하는 데 CFD 도구를 점점 더 많이 사용하게 되었습니다. 

      보호 농업에서 CFD는 온실 환경을 모델링하고 보조 냉방 또는 난방 시스템을 통해 온실의 미기후 관리를 위한 전략을 제안하는 데 사용되는 기술이었습니다(Aguilar Rodríguez et al., 2020).  

      2D 및 3D CFD 모델을 사용한 본격적인 온실 시뮬레이션은 태양 복사 모델과 현열 및 잠열 교환 하위 모델의 통합을 통해 온실의 미기후 분포를 연구하는 데 사용되었습니다(Majdoubi, Boulard, Fatnassi, & Bouirden, 2009). 마찬가지로 이 모델을 사용하여 온실 설계(Sethi, 2009), 덮개 재료(Baxevanou, Fidaros, Bartzanas, & Kittas, 2018), 시간, 연중 계절( Tong, Christopher, Li, & Wang, 2013), 환기 유형 및 구성(Bartzanas, Boulard, & Kittas, 2004). 

      CFD 거래 프로그램은 사용자 친화적인 플랫폼으로 설계되어 결과를 쉽게 관리하고 이해할 수 있습니다.  

      Figura 1. Distribución de presiones y velocidades en un vertedor de pared delgada.
      Figura 2. Perfiles de velocidad y presión en la cresta vertedora.
      Figura 3. Condiciones de aireación en vertedor tipo laberinto. (A)lámina adherida a la pared del
      vertedor, (B) aireado, (C) parcialmente aireado, (D) ahogado.
      Figura 4. Realización de prueba de riego.
      Figura 5. Efecto de la posición y dirección de los calefactores en un invernadero a 2 m del suelo.
      Figura 5. Efecto de la posición y dirección de los calefactores en un invernadero a 2 m del suelo.
      Figura 6. Indicadores ambientales para medir el confort ambiental de los cultivos.
      Figura 6. Indicadores ambientales para medir el confort ambiental de los cultivos.
      Figura 7. Líneas de corriente dentro del sedimentador experimental en estado estacionario  (Ramirez-Ruiz, 2019).
      Figura 7. Líneas de corriente dentro del sedimentador experimental en estado estacionario (Ramirez-Ruiz, 2019).

      Referencias Bibliográficas

      Aguilar-Rodriguez, C.; Flores-Velazquez, J.; Ojeda-Bustamante, W.; Rojano, F.; Iñiguez-
      Covarrubias, M. 2020. Valuation of the energyperformance of a greenhouse with

      an electric heater using numerical simulations. Processes, 8, 600.

      Aguilar-Rodriguez, C.; Flores-Velazquez, J.; Rojano, F.; Ojeda-Bustamante, W.; Iñiguez-
      Covarrubias, M. 2020. Estimación del ciclo de cultivo de tomate (Solanum

      lycopersicum L.) en invernadero, con base en grados días calor (GDC) simulados
      con CFD. Tecnología y ciencias del agua, ISSN 2007-2422, 11(4), 27-57.
      Al-Sammarraee, M., y Chan, A. (2009). Large-eddy simulations of particle sedimentation
      in a longitudinal sedimentation basin of a water treatment plant. Part 2: The effects
      of baffles. Chemical Engineering Journal, 152(2-3), 315-321.
      doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.052.
      Bartzanas, T.; Boulard, T.; Kittas, C. 2004. Effect of vent arrangement on windward
      ventilation of a tunnel greenhouse. Biosystems Engineering, 88(4).
      Baxevanou, C.; Fidaros, D.; Bartzanas, T.; Kittas, C. 2018. Yearly numerical evaluation of
      greenhouse cover materials. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 149, 54–

      1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.12.006.
        Crookston, B. M., & Tullis, B. P. 2012. Labyrinth weirs: Nappe interference and local
        submergence. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 138(8), 757-765.
        Fernández, J. M. 2012. Técnicas numéricas en Ingeniería de Fluidos: Introducción a la
        Dinámica de Fluidos Computacional (CFD) por el Método de Volumen Finito;
        Reverté, Barcelona, pp. 98-294.
        Goula, A., Kostoglou, M., Karapantsios, T., y Zouboulis, A. (2008). The effect of influent
        temperature variations in a sedimentation tank for potable water treatment— A
        computational fluid dynamics study. Water Research, 42(13), 3405-3414.
        doi://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.002.
        Majdoubi, H.; Boulard, T.; Fatnassi, H.; Bouirden, L. 2009. Airflow and microclimate
        patterns in a one-hectare Canary type greenhouse: an experimental and CFD
        assisted study. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149(6-7), 1050-1062.
        Ramirez-Ruiz Candido (2019). Estudio hidrodinámico de sedimentadores de alta tasa en
        plantas potabilizadoras utilizando dinámica de fluidos computacional (CFD).
        Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Tesis de maestría.
        Sánchez, J. M. C., & Elsitdié, L. G. C. 2011. Consideraciones del mallado aplicadas al
        cálculo de flujos bifásicos con las técnicas de dinámica de fluidos computacional.
        J. Introd. Inv. UPCT., 4, 33-35.
        Sethi, V.P. 2009. On the selection of shape and orientation of a greenhouse: Thermal
        modeling and experimental validation, Sol. Energy, 83, 21–38.
        ȘCHEAUA, F. 2016. AGRICULTURAL FIELD IRRIGATION SOLUTION BASED ON
        VENTURI NOZZLE γ 2 g γ 2 g. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN AND
        ENGINEERING GRAPHICS, 2(1), 31–35.

      Tong, G.; Christopher, D.; Li, T.; Wang, T. 2013. Passive solar energy utilization: a review
      of cross-section building parameter selection for Chinese solar greenhouses.
      Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 540-548.

      Xu, Y., Gao, L., Zhao, Y., & Wang, H. 2014. Wet gas overreading characteristics of a long-
      throat Venturi at high pressure based on CFD. Flow Measurement and

      Instrumentation, 40, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2014.09.004
      Wu, W., Rodi, W y Wenka, T. 2000. 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport
      in open channels. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. Vol 126 Num 1.
      Zuhair al zubaidy, Riyadh. 2013. Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flow.
      En:International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research. Vol 2, No 3;
      13p

      Figure 16: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Ghulmet

      댐 붕괴 홍수파 및 범람 매핑 시뮬레이션: A
      아타바드 호수 사례 연구

      Simulation of Dam-Break Flood Wave and Inundation Mapping: A
      Case study of Attabad Lake

      Wasim Karam1, Fayaz A. Khan2, Muhammad Alam3, Sajjad Ali4
      1Lab. Engineer, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Pakistan,
      wasim10karam@gmail.com
      2Assistant Professor, National Institute of Urban Infrastructure Planning, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar,
      Pakistan, fayazuet@yahoo.com
      3,4Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Pakistan,
      emalam82@gmail.com, sajjadali@uetmardan.edu.pk

      ABSTRACT

      산사태 또는 제방 댐의 파손 연구는 구성이 불확실하고 자연적이며 재해에 대해 적절하게 설계되지 않았기 때문에 다른 자연적 사건에 대한 대응 지식이 부족하기 때문에 더 중요합니다. 이 논문은 댐 ​​파괴의 수력학적 모델링의 다양한 방법을 개선하는 것을 목표로 합니다.

      현재 이 연구에서 Attabad 호수의 댐 붕괴는 전산 유체 역학 기술을 사용하여 시뮬레이션됩니다. 수치 모델(FLOW-3D)은 Reynolds 평균 Navier-Stoke 방정식을 완전히 3D로 풀어서 다양한 단면에서의 피크 유량 깊이, 피크 속도, 피크 방전, 피크 깊이까지의 시간 및 피크 방전까지의 시간을 예측하기 위해 개발되었습니다.

      표준 RNG 난류 모델을 사용하여 난류를 시뮬레이션한 다음 마을의 흐름에 대한 홍수 범람 지도와 속도 벡터를 그립니다. 결과는 Hunza 강의 수로를 통해 모델링된 홍수파의 대부분이 Hunza 강의 범람원에 포함되지만 Hunza 강의 범람원 내부에 위치한 Miaun 및 chalat와 같은 일부 마을의 경우 더 높은 위험에 있음을 보여줍니다.

      그러나 이들 마을의 예상 홍수 도달 시간은 각각 31분과 44분으로 인구를 안전한 지역으로 대피시키기에 충분한 시간인 반면, 알리 아바드에 인접한 하산 아바드와 같은 일부 마을의 경우 침수 위험이 더 높은 반면 마을의 예상 홍수 도착 시간은 12분으로 인구 대피에 충분하지 않으므로 홍수 억제를 위한 추가 홍수 보호 구조가 필요합니다.

      최고속도의 추정치는 하천평야의 더 높은 전단응력, 심한 침식의 위험, 농경지 피해, 주거지 및 형태학적 변화가 예상됨을 의미한다. 댐 파손 분석(예: 최고 깊이, 최고 속도, 홍수 도달 시간 및 홍수 범람 지도)은 향후 위험 분석 및 홍수 관리의 지침으로만 사용해야 합니다.

      Figure 2: Case Study Location on Map of Pakistan
      Figure 2: Case Study Location on Map of Pakistan
      Figure 3: Lake Condition 3 months after Landslide
      Figure 3: Lake Condition 3 months after Landslide
      Figure 5: 3D Model from the Merged DEM
      Figure 5: 3D Model from the Merged DEM
      Figure 7: Free Surface Elevation relative to local origin
      Figure 7: Free Surface Elevation relative to local origin
      Figure 8: Model of lake referenced over Google Earth Image
      Figure 8: Model of lake referenced over Google Earth Image
      Figure 9: Meshing in the 3D Terrain Model
      Figure 9: Meshing in the 3D Terrain Model
      Figure 10: Flow Depth Hydrographs of the downstream villages  (A) Karim Abad (B) Ghulmet (C) Thol (D) Chalat (E) Nomal
      Figure 10: Flow Depth Hydrographs of the downstream villages (A) Karim Abad (B) Ghulmet (C) Thol (D) Chalat (E) Nomal
      Figure 11: Flow Hydrograph at Karim Abad and Nomal Bridge
      Figure 11: Flow Hydrograph at Karim Abad and Nomal Bridge
      Figure 12: Flood Inundation Map of Karim Abad
      Figure 12: Flood Inundation Map of Karim Abad
      Figure 13: Flood Inundation Map of Ghulmet
      Figure 13: Flood Inundation Map of Ghulmet
      Figure 14: Flood Inundation Map of Chalat
      Figure 14: Flood Inundation Map of Chalat
      Figure 15: Velocity Vectors of flow at Karim Abad
      Figure 15: Velocity Vectors of flow at Karim Abad
      Figure 16: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Ghulmet
      Figure 16: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Ghulmet
      Figure 17: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Chalat
      Figure 17: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Chalat

      REFERENCES

      [1]. Zhang, L. & Peng, M. & Chang, D.S. & Xu, Y. (2015).
      Dam Failure Mechanisms and Risk Assessment, First
      Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Singapore 473 pp.
      10.1002/9781118558522.
      [2]. T. L. Wahl, “Dam Breach Modeling – an Overview of
      Analysis Methods,” 2nd Jt. Fed. Interagency Conf. Las
      Vegas, NV, pp. 1–12, 2010.
      [3]. Khosravi K. “Dam Break Analysis and Flood
      Inundation Mapping : The Case Study of Sefid-Rud
      Dam,” no. August 2019. DOI:
      10.1016/B978-0-12-815998-9.00031-2
      [4]. Robb, D. M., & Vasquez, J. A. (2015). Numerical
      simulation of dam-break flows using depth-averaged
      hydrodynamic and three-dimensional CFD models.
      22nd Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference, (June).
      [5]. Mohammad Rostami, M. S. (2015). Human Life Saving
      by Simulation of Dam Break using Flow-3D. Trend in
      Life Sciences, 4(3), 308–316
      [6]. Gharbi, M., Soualmia, A., Dartus, D., & Masbernat, L.
      (2016). Comparison of 1D and 2D hydraulic models
      for floods simulation on the Medjerda River in
      Tunisia. Journal of Materials and Environmental
      Science, 7(8), 3017–3026. https://doi.org/10.1080/153
      [7]. Andrei, A., Robert, B., & Erika, B. (2017). Numerical
      Limitations of 1D Hydraulic Models Using MIKE11
      or HEC-RAS software – A case study of Baraolt
      River, Romania. IOP Conference Series: Materials
      Science and Engineering, 245(7).
      https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/7/072010
      [8]. Henderson, F.M. (1966). Open Channel Flow. MacMillan
      Company, New York, USA, P. No 304-313
      [9]. Betsholtz, A., & Nordlöf, B. (2017). Potentials and
      limitations of 1D, 2D and coupled 1D-2D flood
      modeling in HEC-RAS. Lund University, 128.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9440(03)00139-5
      [10].Ozmen-Cagatay, H., & Kocaman, S. (2011). Dam-break
      flow in the presence of obstacle: Experiment and CFD
      simulation. Engineering Applications of Computational
      Fluid Mechanics, 5(4), 541–552.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015393
      [11].Toombes, L., & Chanson, H. (2011). Numerical
      Limitations of Hydraulic Models. 10th Hydraulics
      Conference, (July), 2322–2329.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1613
      [12].Zarein, M. (2015). Modeling Dam-Break Flows Using
      a 3d Mike 3 Flow Model, (January).
      [13].George, A. C., & Nair, B. T. (2015). Dam Break
      Analysis Using BOSS DAMBRK. Aquatic Procedia,
      4(Icwrcoe), 853–860.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.10
      [14].S. Roga and K. M. Pandey, “Computational Analysis of
      Supersonic Flow Regime Using Ramp Injector with
      Standard K- ω Turbulence Model” .World Academy of
      research in Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp.
      31–40, 2013.http:// doi.org/10.1.1.348.5862.

      Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation

      Understanding dry-out mechanism in rod bundles of boiling water reactor

      끓는 물 원자로 봉 다발의 건조 메커니즘 이해

      Liril D.SilviaDinesh K.ChandrakercSumanaGhoshaArup KDasb
      aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
      bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
      cReactor Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

      Abstract

      Present work reports numerical understanding of interfacial dynamics during co-flow of vapor and liquid phases of water inside a typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), consisting of a nuclear fuel rod bundle assembly of 7 pins in a circular array. Two representative spacings between rods in a circular array are used to carry out the simulation. In literature, flow boiling in a nuclear reactor is dealt with mechanistic models or averaged equations. Hence, in the present study using the Volume of Fluid (VOF) based multiphase model, a detailed numerical understanding of breaking and making in interfaces during flow boiling in BWR is targeted. Our work will portray near realistic vapor bubble and liquid flow dynamics in rod bundle scenario. Constant wall heat flux for fuel rod and uniform velocity of the liquid at the inlet patch is applied as a boundary condition. The saturation properties of water are taken at 30 bar pressure. Flow boiling stages involving bubble nucleation, growth, merging, local dry-out, rewetting with liquid patches, and complete dry-out are illustrated. The dry-out phenomenon with no liquid presence is numerically observed with phase fraction contours at various axial cut-sections. The quantification of the liquid phase fraction at different axial planes is plotted over time, emphasizing the progressive dry-out mechanism. A comparison of liquid-vapor distribution for inner and outer rods reveals that the inner rod’s dry-out occurs sooner than that of the outer rod. The heat transfer coefficient to identify the heat dissipation capacity of each case is also reported.

      현재 작업은 원형 배열에 있는 7개의 핀으로 구성된 핵연료봉 다발 어셈블리로 구성된 일반적인 끓는 물 원자로(BWR) 내부의 물의 증기 및 액체상의 동시 흐름 동안 계면 역학에 대한 수치적 이해를 보고합니다.

      원형 배열의 막대 사이에 두 개의 대표적인 간격이 시뮬레이션을 수행하는 데 사용됩니다. 문헌에서 원자로의 유동 비등은 기계론적 모델 또는 평균 방정식으로 처리됩니다.

      따라서 VOF(Volume of Fluid) 기반 다상 모델을 사용하는 본 연구에서는 BWR에서 유동 비등 동안 계면의 파괴 및 생성에 대한 자세한 수치적 이해를 목표로 합니다.

      우리의 작업은 막대 번들 시나리오에서 거의 사실적인 증기 기포 및 액체 흐름 역학을 묘사합니다. 연료봉에 대한 일정한 벽 열유속과 입구 패치에서 액체의 균일한 속도가 경계 조건으로 적용됩니다. 물의 포화 특성은 30bar 압력에서 취합니다.

      기포 핵 생성, 성장, 병합, 국소 건조, 액체 패치로 재습윤 및 완전한 건조를 포함하는 유동 비등 단계가 설명됩니다. 액체가 존재하지 않는 건조 현상은 다양한 축 단면에서 위상 분율 윤곽으로 수치적으로 관찰됩니다.

      다른 축 평면에서 액상 분율의 정량화는 점진적인 건조 메커니즘을 강조하면서 시간이 지남에 따라 표시됩니다. 내부 막대와 외부 막대의 액-증기 분포를 비교하면 내부 막대의 건조가 외부 막대보다 더 빨리 발생함을 알 수 있습니다. 각 경우의 방열 용량을 식별하기 위한 열 전달 계수도 보고됩니다.

      Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation
      Fig. 1. A typical Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and selected segment of study for simulation
      Fig. 2. (a-c) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 6 mm; (d-f) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 0.6 mm
      Fig. 2. (a-c) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 6 mm; (d-f) dimensions and mesh configuration for G = 0.6 mm
      Fig. 3. Simulating the effect of spacer (a) Spacer configuration around rod bundle (b) Mesh structure in spacer zone (c) Distribution of vapor bubbles in a rod bundle with spacer (d) Liquid phase fraction comparison for geometry with and without spacer (e,f,g) Wall temperature comparison for geometry with and without spacer; WS: With Spacer, WOS: Without Spacer; Temperature in the y-axis is in (f) and (g) is same as (e).
      Fig. 3. Simulating the effect of spacer (a) Spacer configuration around rod bundle (b) Mesh structure in spacer zone (c) Distribution of vapor bubbles in a rod bundle with spacer (d) Liquid phase fraction comparison for geometry with and without spacer (e,f,g) Wall temperature comparison for geometry with and without spacer; WS: With Spacer, WOS: Without Spacer; Temperature in the y-axis is in (f) and (g) is same as (e).
      Fig. 4. Validation of the present numerical model with crossflow boiling over a heated cylindrical rod [40]
      Fig. 4. Validation of the present numerical model with crossflow boiling over a heated cylindrical rod [40]
      Fig. 5. Grid-Independent study in terms of vapor volume in 1/4th of computational domain
      Fig. 5. Grid-Independent study in terms of vapor volume in 1/4th of computational domain
      Fig. 6. Interface contour for G = 6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; q˙ w = 396 kW/m2; they are showing nucleation, growth, merging, and pseudo-steady-state condition.
      Fig. 6. Interface contour for G = 6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; q˙ w = 396 kW/m2; they are showing nucleation, growth, merging, and pseudo-steady-state condition.
      Fig. 7. Interface contours for G = 0.6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; q˙ w = 396 kW/m2; It shows dry-out at pseudo-steady-state near the exit
      Fig. 7. Interface contours for G = 0.6 mm; ul = 1.2 m/s; q˙ w = 396 kW/m2; It shows dry-out at pseudo-steady-state near the exit
      Fig. 8. Vapor-liquid distribution across various distant cross-sections (Black color indicates liquid; Gray color indicates vapor); Magnification factor: 1 × (for a and b), 1.5 × (for c and d)
      Fig. 8. Vapor-liquid distribution across various distant cross-sections (Black color indicates liquid; Gray color indicates vapor); Magnification factor: 1 × (for a and b), 1.5 × (for c and d)
      Fig. 21. Two-phase flow mixture velocity (u¯z); for G = 6 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 25 means location at outer adiabatic wall; for G = 0.66 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 16.6 mm means location at outer adiabatic wall.
      Fig. 21. Two-phase flow mixture velocity (u¯z); for G = 6 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 25 means location at outer adiabatic wall; for G = 0.66 mm, r = 5 means location at inner heated wall and r = 16.6 mm means location at outer adiabatic wall.

      References

      [1] J. Würtz, An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Annular Steam-Water Flow in Tubes and Annuli at 30 to 90 Bar, Risø National Laboratory,
      Roskilde, 1978.
      [2] W. Tian, A. Myint, Z. Li, S. Qiu, G.H. Su, D. Jia, Experimental study on dryout point in vertical narrow annulus under low flow conditions, in: International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, 4689, 2004, pp. 643–648. Jan
      1Vol.
      [3] K.M. Becker, C.H. Ling, S. Hedberg, G. Strand, An experimental investigation of
      post dryout heat transfer, R. Inst. Technol. (1983).
      [4] K.M. Becker, A Burnout Correlation for Flow of Boiling Water in Vertical Rod
      Bundles, AB Atomenergi, 1967.
      [5] Jr J.R. Barbosa, G.F. Hewitt, S.M. Richardson, High-speed visualisation of nucleate boiling in vertical annular flow, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 46 (26) (2003)
      5153–5160 1, doi:10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00255-2.
      [6] Y. Mizutani, A. Tomiyama, S. Hosokawa, A. Sou, Y. Kudo, K. Mishima, Twophase flow patterns in a four by four rod bundle, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 44 (6)
      (2007) 894–901 1, doi:10.1080/18811248.2007.9711327.
      [7] S.S. Paranjape, Two-Phase Flow Interfacial Structures in a Rod Bundle Geometry, Purdue University, 2009.
      [8] D. Lavicka, J. Polansky, Model of the cooling of a nuclear reactor fuel rod, Multiph. Sci. Technol. 25 (2-4) (2013), doi:10.1615/MultScienTechn.v25.i2-4.90.
      [9] M. Thurgood, J. Kelly, T. Guidotti, R. Kohrt, K. Crowell, Tech. rep., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 1983.
      [10] S. Sugawara, Droplet deposition and entrainment modeling based on the
      three-fluid model, Nucl. Eng. Des. 122 (1-3) (1990) 67–84, doi:10.1016/
      0029-5493(90)90197-6.
      [11] C. Adamsson, J.M. Le Corre, Modeling and validation of a mechanistic tool
      (MEFISTO) for the prediction of critical power in BWR fuel assemblies, Nucl.
      Eng. Des. 241 (8) (2011) 2843–2858, doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.01.033.
      [12] S. Talebi, H. Kazeminejad, A mathematical approach to predict dryout in a rod
      bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. 249 (2012) 348–356, doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.04.
      016.
      [13] H. Anglart, O. Nylund, N. Kurul, M.Z. Podowski, CFD prediction of flow and
      phase distribution in fuel assemblies with spacers, Nucl. Eng. Des. 177 (1-3)
      (1997) 215–228, doi:10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00195-7.
      [14] H. Li, H. Anglart, CFD model of diabatic annular two-phase flow using the
      Eulerian–Lagrangian approach, Ann. Nucl. Energy 77 (2015) 415–424, doi:10.
      1016/j.anucene.2014.12.002.
      [15] G. Sorokin, A. Sorokin, Experimental and numerical investigation of liquid metal boiling in fuel subassemblies under natural circulation conditions, Prog. Nucl. Energy 47 (1-4) (2005) 656–663, doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.
      05.069.
      [16] W.D. Pointer, A. Tentner, T. Sofu, D. Weber, S. Lo, A. Splawski, Eulerian
      two-phase computational fluid dynamics for boiling water reactor core analysis, Joint International Topical Meeting on Mathematics and Computation and
      Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications (M and C± SNA), 2007.
      [17] K. Podila, Y. Rao, CFD modelling of supercritical water flow and heat transfer
      in a 2 × 2 fuel rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. 301 (2016) 279–289, doi:10.1016/j.
      nucengdes.2016.03.019.
      [18] H. Pothukuchi, S. Kelm, B.S. Patnaik, B.V. Prasad, H.J. Allelein, Numerical investigation of subcooled flow boiling in an annulus under the influence of eccentricity, Appl. Therm. Eng. 129 (2018) 1604–1617, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.
      2017.10.105.
      [19] H. Pothukuchi, S. Kelm, B.S. Patnaik, B.V. Prasad, H.J. Allelein, CFD modeling of
      critical heat flux in flow boiling: validation and assessment of closure models,
      Appl. Therm. Eng. 150 (2019) 651–665, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.01.
      030.
      [20] W. Fan, H. Li, H. Anglart, A study of rewetting and conjugate heat transfer
      influence on dryout and post-dryout phenomena with a multi-domain coupled CFD approach, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 163 (2020) 120503, doi:10.1016/j.
      ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120503.
      [21] R. Zhang, T. Cong, G. Su, J. Wang, S. Qiu, Investigation on the critical heat
      flux in typical 5 by 5 rod bundle at conditions prototypical of PWR based
      on CFD methodology, Appl. Therm. Eng. 179 (2020) 115582, doi:10.1016/j.
      applthermaleng.2020.115582.

      [22] L.D. Silvi, A. Saha, D.K. Chandraker, S. Ghosh, A.K. Das, Numerical analysis of
      pre-dryout sequences through the route of interfacial evolution in annular gasliquid two-phase flow with phase change, Chem. Eng. Sci. 212 (2020) 115356,
      doi:10.1016/j.ces.2019.115356.
      [23] L.D. Silvi, D.K. Chandraker, S. Ghosh, A.K. Das, On-route to dryout through sequential interfacial dynamics in annular flow boiling around temperature and
      heat flux controlled heater rod, Chem. Eng. Sci. 229 (2021) 116014, doi:10.1016/
      j.ces.2020.116014.
      [24] J.U. Brackbill, D.B. Kothe, C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface
      tension, J. Comput. Phys. 100 (2) (1992) 335–354, doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)
      90240-Y.
      [25] B. Lafaurie, C. Nardone, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, G. Zanetti, Modelling merging
      and fragmentation in multiphase flows with SURFER, J. Comput. Phys. 113 (1)
      (1994) 134–147, doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1123.
      [26] I. Tanasawa, Advances in condensation heat transfer, Ad. Heat Transf. 21 (1991)
      55–139 Vol, doi:10.1016/S0065-2717(08)70334-4.
      [27] V.H. Del Valle, D.B. Kenning, Subcooled flow boiling at high heat flux, Int.
      J. Heat Mass Transf. 28 (10) (1985) 1907–1920, doi:10.1016/0017-9310(85)
      90213-3.
      [28] B. Matzner, G.M. Latter, Reduced pressure drop space for boiling water reactor
      fuel bundles, US Patent US5375154A, (1993)
      [29] C. Unal, O. Badr, K. Tuzla, J.C. Chen, S. Neti, Pressure drop at rod-bundle spacers
      in the post-CHF dispersed flow regime, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 20 (3) (1994)
      515–522, doi:10.1016/0301-9322(94)90025-6.
      [30] D.K. Chandraker, A.K. Nayak, V.P. Krishnan, Effect of spacer on the dryout of
      BWR fuel rod assemblies, Nucl. Eng. Des. 294 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.
      2015.09.004.
      [31] S.K Verma, S.L. Sinha, D.K. Chandraker, A comprehensive review of the spacer
      effect on performance of nuclear fuel bundle using computational fluid dynamics methodology, Mater. Today: Proc. 4 (2017) 100030–110034, doi:10.
      1016/j.matpr.2017.06.315.
      [32] S.K Verma, S.L. Sinha, D.K. Chandraker, Experimental investigation on the effect
      of space on the turbulent mixing in vertical pressure tube-type boiling water
      reactor, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 190 (2) (2018), doi:10.1080/00295639.2017.1413874.
      [33] T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer characteristics of subcooled boiling in a single rod channel with/without spacer grid,
      Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 20 (2020) 100644, doi:10.1016/j.csite.2020.100644.
      [34] K.M. Becker, G. Hernborg, M. Bode, O. Eriksson, Burnout data for flow of boiling water in vertical round ducts, annuli and rod clusters, AB Atomenergi
      (1965).
      [35] A. Saha, A.K. Das, Numerical study of boiling around wires and influence of
      active or passive neighbours on vapour film dynamics, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
      130 (2019) 440–454, doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.117.
      [36] M. Reimann, U. Grigull, Heat transfer with free convection and film boiling in
      the critical area of water and carbon dioxide, Heat Mass Transf. 8 (1975) 229–
      239, doi:10.1007/BF01002151.
      [37] M.S. Plesset, S.A. Zwick, The growth of vapor bubbles in superheated liquids, J.
      Appl. Phys. 25 (4) (1954) 493–500, doi:10.1063/1.1721668.
      [38] N. Samkhaniani, M.R. Ansari, Numerical simulation of superheated vapor bubble rising in stagnant liquid, Heat Mass Transf. 53 (9) (2017) 2885–2899,
      doi:10.1007/S00231-017-2031-6.
      [39] N. Samkhaniani, M.R. Ansari, The evaluation of the diffuse interface method
      for phase change simulations using OpenFOAM, Heat Transf. Asian Res. 46 (8)
      (2017) 1173–1203, doi:10.1002/htj.21268.
      [40] P. Goel, A.K. Nayak, M.K. Das, J.B. Joshi, Bubble departure characteristics in a
      horizontal tube bundle under cross flow conditions, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 100
      (2018) 143–154, doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.12.013.
      [41] K.M. Becker, J. Engstorm, B.Scholin Nylund, B. Sodequist, Analysis of the dryout
      incident in the Oskarshamn 2 boiling water reactor, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 16 (6)
      (1990) 959–974, doi:10.1016/0301-9322(90)90101-N.
      [42] H.G. Weller, A New Approach to VOF-Based Interface Capturing Methods
      for Incompressible and Compressible Flow, A New Approach to VOF-Based
      Interface Capturing Methods for Incompressible and Compressible Flow, 4,
      OpenCFD Ltd., 2008 Report TR/HGW.
      [43] G. Boeing, Visual analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems: chaos, fractals, selfsimilarity and the limits of prediction, Systems 4 (4) (2016) 37, doi:10.3390/
      systems4040037.

      Fig. 4. Meshed quarter aluminum model with HAZ regions and support steel plates.

      Benchmark study on slamming response of flat-stiffened plates considering fluid-structure interaction

      유체-구조 상호작용을 고려한 평판 보강판의 슬래밍 응답에 대한 벤치마크 연구

      Dac DungTruongabBeom-SeonJangaCarl-ErikJansoncJonas W.RingsbergcYasuhiraYamadadKotaTakamotofYasumiKawamuraeHan-BaekJua
      aResearch Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
      bDepartment of Engineering Mechanics, Nha Trang University, Nha Trang, Viet Nam
      cDivision of Marine Technology, Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
      dNational Maritime Research Institute, National Institute of Maritime, Port and Aviation Technology, Tokyo, Japan
      eDepartment of Systems Design for Ocean-Space, Yokohama National University, Kanagawa, Japan
      fDepartment of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan

      ABSTRACT

      이 논문은 해양구조물의 평보강판의 슬래밍 반응에 대한 벤치마크 연구를 제시합니다. 목표는 유체-구조 상호작용(FSI) 시뮬레이션 방법론, 모델링 기술 및 슬래밍 압력 예측에 대한 기존 연구원의 경험을 비교하는 것이었습니다.

      수치 FSI 시뮬레이션을 위해 가장 일반적인 상용 소프트웨어 패키지를 사용하는 3개의 연구 그룹(예: LS-Dyna ALE, LS-Dyna ICFD, ANSYS CFX 및 Star-CCM+/ABAQUS)이 이 연구에 참여했습니다.

      공개 문헌에서 입수할 수 있는 경량 선박과 같은 바닥 구조의 평평한 강화 알루미늄 판에 대한 습식 낙하 시험 데이터는 FSI 모델링의 검증에 활용되었습니다. 형상 모델 및 재료 속성을 포함한 실험 조건의 요약은 시뮬레이션 전에 참가자에게 배포되었습니다.

      충돌 속도와 강판의 강성이 슬래밍 응답에 미치는 영향을 조사하기 위해 해양 설비에 사용되는 실제 치수를 갖는 평판 보강 강판에 대한 매개변수 연구를 수행했습니다. 보강판에 작용하는 전체 수직력에 대한 FE 시뮬레이션 결과와 이러한 힘에 대한 구조적 반응을 참가자로부터 획득하여 분석 및 비교하였다.

      앞서 언급한 상용 FSI 소프트웨어 패키지를 사용하여 슬래밍 부하에 대한 신뢰할 수 있고 정확한 예측을 평가했습니다. 또한 FSI 시뮬레이션에서 관찰된 동일한 영구 처짐을 초래하는 등가 정적 슬래밍 압력을 보고하고 분류 표준 DNV에서 제안한 해석 모델 및 슬래밍 압력 계산을 위한 기존 실험 데이터와 비교했습니다.

      연구 결과는 등가 하중 모델이 물 충돌 속도와 플레이트 강성에 의존한다는 것을 보여주었습니다. 즉, 등가정압계수는 충돌속도가 증가함에 따라 감소하고 충돌구조가 더 단단해지면 증가한다.

      This paper presents a benchmark study on the slamming responses of offshore structures’ flat-stiffened plates. The objective was to compare the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation methodologies, modeling techniques, and established researchers’ experiences in predicting slamming pressure. Three research groups employing the most common commercial software packages for numerical FSI simulations (i.e. LS-Dyna ALE, LS-Dyna ICFD, ANSYS CFX, and Star-CCM+/ABAQUS) participated in this study. Wet drop test data on flat-stiffened aluminum plates of light-ship-like bottom structures available in the open literature was utilized for validation of the FSI modeling. A summary of the experimental conditions including the geometry model and material properties, was distributed to the participants prior to their simulations. A parametric study on flat-stiffened steel plates having actual scantlings used in marine installations was performed to investigate the effect of impact velocity and plate rigidity on slamming response. The FE simulation results for the total vertical forces acting on the stiffened plates and their structural responses to those forces, as obtained from the participants, were analyzed and compared. The reliable and accurate predictions of slamming loads using the aforementioned commercial FSI software packages were evaluated. Additionally, equivalent static slamming pressures resulting in the same permanent deflections, as observed from the FSI simulations, were reported and compared with analytical models proposed by the Classification Standards DNV and existing experimental data for calculation of the slamming pressure. The study results showed that the equivalent load model depends on the water impact velocity and plate rigidity; that is, the equivalent static pressure coefficient decreases with an increase in impact velocity, and increases when impacting structures become stiffer.

      Fig. 4. Meshed quarter aluminum model with HAZ regions and support steel plates.
      Fig. 4. Meshed quarter aluminum model with HAZ regions and support steel plates.
      Fig. 6. (a) Boundary conditions of water hitting case and (b) water jets at end of the simulation.
      Fig. 6. (a) Boundary conditions of water hitting case and (b) water jets at end of the simulation.
      Fig. 7. Comparison of prediction and test results for deflection time history of (a) D1 and (b) D2 for Vi = 2.3 m/s.
      Fig. 7. Comparison of prediction and test results for deflection time history of (a) D1 and (b) D2 for Vi = 2.3 m/s.
      Fig. 8. Comparison of prediction and test results for maximum deflection with different impact velocities.
      Fig. 8. Comparison of prediction and test results for maximum deflection with different impact velocities.
      Fig. 16. Boundary conditions applied to present FSI simulations (Sym. denotes symmetric, and Cons. denotes constrained)
      Fig. 16. Boundary conditions applied to present FSI simulations (Sym. denotes symmetric, and Cons. denotes constrained)
      Fig. 24. Distribution of deflections at moment of maximum deflection in: (a) LS-Dyna ALE, (b) Star-CCM+/ABAQUS, (c) ANSYS CFD, and (d) LSDyna ICFD (unit: m).

      Keywords

      Benchmark studyEquivalent static pressureFlat-stiffened plateFluid-structure interactionPermanent deflectionSlamming pressure coefficient

      References

      [1] Von Karman TH. The impact on seaplane floats during landing. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics; 1929. Technical note No.: 321.
      [2] Wagner VH. Über Stoß- und Gleitvorgange ¨ an der Oberflache ¨ von Flüssigkeiten. Z Angew Math Mech 1932;12(4):193–215.
      [3] Chuang SL. Experiments on flat-bottom slamming. J Ship Res 1966;10:10–7.
      [4] Chuang SL. Investigation of impact of rigid and elastic bodies with water. Report for Department of the Navy. Washington, DC: United States Department of the
      Navy; 1970. Report No.: 3248.
      [5] Mori K. Response of the bottom plate of high-speed crafts under impulsive water pressure. J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 1977;142:297–305 [Japanese].
      [6] Cheon JS, Jang BS, Yim KH, Lee HSD, Koo BY, Ju HB. A study on slamming pressure on a flat stiffened plate considering fluid–structure interaction. J Mar Sci
      Technol 2016;21:309–24.
      [7] Truong DD, Jang BS, Ju HB, Han SW. Prediction of slamming pressure considering fluid-structure interaction. Part I: Numerical simulations. Ships Offshore
      Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1816732.
      [8] Truong DD, Jang BS, Ju HB, Han SW. Prediction of slamming pressure considering fluid-structure interaction. Part II: Derivation of empirical formulations. Mar
      Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.102700.
      [9] Greenhow M, Lin W. Numerical simulation of nonlinear free surface flows generated by wedge entry and wave maker motions. In: Proceedings of the 4th
      international conference on numerical ship hydrodynamics, Washington, DC; 1985.
      [10] Sun H, Faltinsen OM. Water impact of horizontal circular cylinders and cylindrical shells. Appl Ocean Res 2006;28(5):299–311.
      [11] Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Royal Astronomical Society 1977;181:375–89.
      [12] Shao S. Incompressible SPH simulation of water entry of a free-falling object. Int J Numer Methods Fluid 2009;59(1):91–115.
      [13] Souli M, Ouahsine A, Lewin L. ALE formulation for fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2000;190(5):659–75.
      [14] Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). ICFD theory manual incompressible fluid solver in LS-DYNA. Livermore Software Technology Corporation;

      [15] Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). LS-DYNA theoretical manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation; 2006.
      [16] FLOW-3D user’s manual. 2018., version 12.0.
      [17] Cd-adapco. STAR-CCM+ User’s manual. 2012., version 7.06.
      [18] ANSYS fluent user’s guide. 2015.
      [19] ANSYS CFX user’s guide. 2014.
      [20] Abaqus user’s manual, version 6.13. SIMULIA; 2013.
      [21] Luo HB, Hu J, Guedes Soares C. Numerical simulation of hydroelastic responses of flat stiffened panels under slamming loads. In: Proceedings of the 29th
      international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE2010); 2010 [Shanghai, China].[22] Yamada Y, Takami T, Oka M. Numerical study on the slamming impact of wedge shaped obstacles considering fluid-structure interaction (FSI). In: Proceedings
      of the 22nd international offshore and polar engineering conference (ISOPE2012); 2012 [Rhodes, Greece].
      [23] Luo HB, Wang H, Guedes Soares C. Numerical and experimental study of hydrodynamic impact and elastic response of one free-drop wedge with stiffened
      panels. Ocean Eng 2012;40:1–14.
      [24] Sun H, Wang DY. Experimental and numerical analysis of hydrodynamic impact on stiffened side of three dimensional elastic stiffened plates. Adv Mech Eng
      2018;10(4):1–23.
      [25] Ma S, Mahfuz H. Finite element simulation of composite ship structures with fluid structure interaction. Ocean Eng 2012;52:52–9.
      [26] LSTC. Turek & hron’s FSI benchmark problem. 2012.
      [27] Califano A, Brinchmann K. Evaluation of loads during a free-fall lifeboat drop. In: Proceedings of the ASME 32nd international conference on ocean, offshore
      and arctic engineering (OMAE2013); 2013 [Nantes, France].
      [28] LSTC. 3D fluid elastic body interaction problem. 2014.
      [29] Yamada Y, Takamoto K, Nakanishi T, Ma C, Komoriyama Y. Numerical study on the slamming impact of stiffened flat panel using ICFD method – effect of
      structural rigidity on the slamming impact. In: Proceedings of the ASME 39th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE2020);
      2020 [Florida, USA].
      [30] Nicolici S, Bilegan RM. Fluid structure interaction modeling of liquid sloshing phenomena in flexible tanks in flexible tanks. Nucl Eng Des 2013;258:51–6.
      [31] DNV. DNV-RP-C205 environmental conditions and environmental loads. Det Norske Veritas; October 2010.
      [32] Ahmed YM. Numerical simulation for the free surface flow around a complex ship hull form at different froude numbers. Alex Eng J 2011;50(3):229–35.
      [33] Ghadimi P, Feizi Chekab MA, Dashtimanesh A. Numerical simulation of water entry of different arbitrary bow sections. J Nav Architect Mar Eng 2014;11:
      117–29.
      [34] Park BW, Cho S-R. Simple design formulae for predicting the residual damage of unstiffened and stiffened plates under explosive loadings. Int J Impact Eng
      2006;32:1721–36.
      [35] Truong DD, Shin HK, Cho S-R. Permanent set evolution of aluminium-alloy plates due to repeated impulsive pressure loadings induced by slamming. J Mar Sci
      Technol 2018;23:580–95.
      [36] Jones N. Structural impact. first ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
      [37] Zha Y, Moan T. Ultimate strength of stiffened aluminium panels with predominantly torsional failure modes. Thin-Walled Struct 2001;39:631–48.
      [38] Sensharma P, Collette M, Harrington J. Effect of welded properties on aluminum structures. Ship Structure Committee SSC-4 2010.
      [39] ABS. Guide for slamming loads and strength assessment for vessels. 2011.
      [40] Villavicencio R, Sutherland L, Guedes Soares C. Numerical simulation of transversely impacted, clamped circular aluminium plates. Ships Offshore Struct 2012;7(1):31–45.
      [41] Material properties database. https://www.varmintal.com/aengr.htm, Assessed date: 16 May 2020.
      [42] Ringsberg JW, Andri´c J, Heggelund SE, Homma N, Huang YT, Jang BS, et al. Report of the ISSC technical committee II.1 on quasi-static response. In:
      Kaminski ML, Rigo P, editors. Proceedings of the 20th international ship and offshore structures congress (ISSC 2018), vol. 1. IOS Press BV; 2018. p. 226–31.
      [43] Shin HK, Kim S-C, Cho S-R. Experimental investigations on slamming impacts by drop tests. J Soc Nav Archit Korea 2010;47(3):410–20 [Korean].
      [44] Huera-Huarte FJ, Jeon D, Gharib M. Experimental investigation of water slamming loads on panels. Ocean Eng 2011;38:1347–55.

      Liquid-solid co-printing of multi-material 3D fluidic devices via material jetting

      재료 분사를 통한 다중 재료 3D 유체 장치의 액체-고체 공동 인쇄

      Liquid-solid co-printing of multi-material 3D fluidic devices via material jetting

      BrandonHayes,Travis Hainsworth, Robert MacCurdy
      University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boulder, 80309, CO, USA

      Abstract

      다중 재료 재료 분사 적층 제조 공정은 3차원(3D) 부품을 레이어별로 구축하기 위해 다양한 모델 및 지지 재료의 미세 액적을 증착합니다.

      최근의 노력은 액체가 마이크로/밀리 채널에서 쉽게 퍼지할 수 있는 지지 재료로 작용할 수 있고 구조에 영구적으로 남아 있는 작동 유체로 작용할 수 있음을 보여주었지만 인쇄 프로세스 및 메커니즘에 대한 자세한 이해가 부족합니다.

      액체 인쇄의 제한된 광범위한 적용. 이 연구에서 광경화성 및 광경화성 액체 방울이 동시에 증착되는 액체-고체 공동 인쇄라고 하는 “한 번에 모두 가능한” 다중 재료 인쇄 프로세스가 광범위하게 특성화됩니다. 액체-고체 공동 인쇄의 메커니즘은 실험적인 고속 이미징 및 CFD(전산 유체 역학) 연구를 통해 설명됩니다.

      이 연구는 액체의 표면 장력이 액체 표면에서 광중합하여 재료의 단단한 층을 형성하는 분사된 광중합체 미세 방울을 지지할 수 있음을 보여줍니다.

      마이크로/밀리 유체 소자의 액체-고체 공동 인쇄를 위한 설계 규칙은 믹서, 액적 발생기, 고도로 분기되는 구조 및 통합된 단방향 플랩 밸브와 같은 평면, 3D 및 복합 재료 마이크로/메조 유체 구조에 대한 사례 연구뿐만 아니라 제시됩니다.

      우리는 액체-고체 공동 인쇄 과정을 마이크로/메조플루이딕 회로, 전기화학 트랜지스터, 칩 장치 및 로봇을 포함한 응용 프로그램을 사용하여 3D, 통합된 복합 재료 유체 회로 및 유압 구조의 단순하고 빠른 제작을 가능하게 하는 적층 제조의 핵심 새로운 기능으로 구상합니다.

      Multi-material material jetting additive manufacturing processes deposit micro-scale droplets of different model and support materials to build three-dimensional (3D) parts layer by layer. Recent efforts have demonstrated that liquids can act as support materials, which can be easily purged from micro/milli-channels, and as working fluids, which permanently remain in a structure, yet the lack of a detailed understanding of the print process and mechanism has limited widespread applications of liquid printing. In this study, an “all in one go” multi-material print process, herein termed liquid–solid co-printing in which non photo-curable and photo-curable liquid droplets are simultaneous deposited, is extensively characterized. The mechanism of liquid–solid co-printing is explained via experimental high speed imaging and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) studies. This work shows that a liquid’s surface tension can support jetted photopolymer micro-droplets which photo-polymerize on the liquid surface to form a solid layer of material. Design rules for liquid–solid co-printing of micro/milli-fluidic devices are presented as well as case studies of planar, 3D, and multi-material micro/mesofluidic structures such as mixers, droplet generators, highly branching structures, and an integrated one-way flap valve. We envision the liquid–solid co-printing process as a key new capability in additive manufacturing to enable simple and rapid fabrication of 3D, integrated print-in-place multi-material fluidic circuits and hydraulic structures with applications including micro/mesofluidic circuits, electrochemical transistors, lab-on-a-chip devices, and robotics.

      Liquid-solid co-printing of multi-material 3D fluidic devices via material jetting
      Liquid-solid co-printing of multi-material 3D fluidic devices via material jetting

      Keywords

      Additive manufacturing; Mesofluidics; Modeling and simulation; Multi-material; Material jetting

      Fig. 5. The predicted shapes of initial breach (a) Rectangular (b) V-notch. Fig. 6. Dam breaching stages.

      Investigating the peak outflow through a spatial embankment dam breach

      공간적 제방댐 붕괴를 통한 최대 유출량 조사

      Mahmoud T.GhonimMagdy H.MowafyMohamed N.SalemAshrafJatwaryFaculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt

      Abstract

      Investigating the breach outflow hydrograph is an essential task to conduct mitigation plans and flood warnings. In the present study, the spatial dam breach is simulated by using a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model, FLOW-3D. The model parameters were adjusted by making a comparison with a previous experimental model. The different parameters (initial breach shape, dimensions, location, and dam slopes) are studied to investigate their effects on dam breaching. The results indicate that these parameters have a significant impact. The maximum erosion rate and peak outflow for the rectangular shape are higher than those for the V-notch by 8.85% and 5%, respectively. Increasing breach width or decreasing depth by 5% leads to increasing maximum erosion rate by 11% and 15%, respectively. Increasing the downstream slope angle by 4° leads to an increase in both peak outflow and maximum erosion rate by 2.0% and 6.0%, respectively.

      유출 유출 수문곡선을 조사하는 것은 완화 계획 및 홍수 경보를 수행하는 데 필수적인 작업입니다. 본 연구에서는 3차원 전산유체역학 모델인 FLOW-3D를 사용하여 공간 댐 붕괴를 시뮬레이션합니다. 이전 실험 모델과 비교하여 모델 매개변수를 조정했습니다.

      다양한 매개변수(초기 붕괴 형태, 치수, 위치 및 댐 경사)가 댐 붕괴에 미치는 영향을 조사하기 위해 연구됩니다. 결과는 이러한 매개변수가 상당한 영향을 미친다는 것을 나타냅니다. 직사각형 형태의 최대 침식율과 최대 유출량은 V-notch보다 각각 8.85%, 5% 높게 나타났습니다.

      위반 폭을 늘리거나 깊이를 5% 줄이면 최대 침식률이 각각 11% 및 15% 증가합니다. 하류 경사각을 4° 증가시키면 최대 유출량과 최대 침식률이 각각 2.0% 및 6.0% 증가합니다.

      Keywords

      Spatial dam breach; FLOW-3D; Overtopping erosion; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

      1. Introduction

      There are many purposes for dam construction, such as protection from flood disasters, water storage, and power generationEmbankment failures may have a catastrophic impact on lives and infrastructure in the downstream regions. One of the most common causes of embankment dam failure is overtopping. Once the overtopping of the dam begins, the breach formation will start in the dam body then end with the dam failure. This failure occurs within a very short time, which threatens to be very dangerous. Therefore, understanding and modeling the embankment breaching processes is essential for conducting mitigation plans, flood warnings, and forecasting flood damage.

      The analysis of the dam breaching process is implemented by different techniques: comparative methods, empirical models with dimensional and dimensionless solutions, physical-based models, and parametric models. These models were described in detail [1]Parametric modeling is commonly used to simulate breach growth as a time-dependent linear process and calculate outflow discharge from the breach using hydraulics principles [2]. Alhasan et al. [3] presented a simple one-dimensional mathematical model and a computer code to simulate the dam breaching process. These models were validated by small dams breaching during the floods in 2002 in the Czech Republic. Fread [4] developed an erosion model (BREACH) based on hydraulics principles, sediment transport, and soil mechanics to estimate breach size, time of formation, and outflow discharge. Říha et al. [5] investigated the dam break process for a cascade of small dams using a simple parametric model for piping and overtopping erosion, as well as a 2D shallow-water flow model for the flood in downstream areas. Goodarzi et al. [6] implemented mathematical and statistical methods to assess the effect of inflows and wind speeds on the dam’s overtopping failure.

      Dam breaching studies can be divided into two main modes of erosion. The first mode is called “planar dam breach” where the flow overtops the whole dam width. While the second mode is called “spatial dam breach” where the flow overtops through the initial pilot channel (i.e., a channel created in the dam body). Therefore, the erosion will be in both vertical and horizontal directions [7].

      The erosion process through the embankment dams occurs due to the shear stress applied by water flows. The dam breaching evolution can be divided into three stages [8][9], but Y. Yang et al. [10] divided the breach development into five stages: Stage I, the seepage erosion; Stage II, the initial breach formation; Stage III, the head erosion; Stage IV, the breach expansion; and Stage V, the re-equilibrium of the river channel through the breach. Many experimental tests have been carried out on non-cohesive embankment dams with an initial breach to examine the effect of upstream inflow discharges on the longitudinal profile evolution and the time to inflection point [11].

      Zhang et al. [12] studied the effect of changing downstream slope angle, sediment grain size, and dam crest length on erosion rates. They noticed that increasing dam crest length and decreasing downstream slope angle lead to decreasing sediment transport rate. While the increase in sediment grain size leads to an increased sediment transport rate at the initial stages. Höeg et al. [13] presented a series of field tests to investigate the stability of embankment dams made of various materials. Overtopping and piping were among the failure tests carried out for the dams composed of homogeneous rock-fill, clay, or gravel with a height of up to 6.0 m. Hakimzadeh et al. [14] constructed 40 homogeneous cohesive and non-cohesive embankment dams to study the effect of changing sediment diameter and dam height on the breaching process. They also used genetic programming (GP) to estimate the breach outflow. Refaiy et al. [15] studied different scenarios for the downstream drain geometry, such as length, height, and angle, to minimize the effect of piping phenomena and therefore increase dam safety.

      Zhu et al. [16] examined the effect of headcut erosion on dam breach growth, especially in the case of cohesive dams. They found that the breach growth in non-cohesive embankments is slower than cohesive embankments due to the little effect of headcut. Schmocker and Hager [7] proposed a relationship for estimating peak outflow from the dam breach process.(1)QpQin-1=1.7exp-20hc23d5013H0

      where: Qp = peak outflow discharge.

      Qin = inflow discharge.

      hc = critical flow depth.

      d50 = mean sediment diameter.

      Ho = initial dam height.

      Yu et al. [17] carried out an experimental study for homogeneous non-cohesive embankment dams in a 180° bending rectangular flume to determine the effect of overtopping flows on breaching formation. They found that the main factors influencing breach formation are water level, river discharge, and embankment material diameter.

      Wu et al. [18] carried out a series of experiments to investigate the effect of breaching geometry on both non-cohesive and cohesive embankment dams in a U-bend flume due to overtopping flows. In the case of non-cohesive embankments, the non-symmetrical lateral expansion was noticed during the breach formation. This expansion was described by a coefficient ranging from 2.7 to 3.3.

      The numerical models of the dam breach can be categorized according to different parameters, such as flow dimensions (1D, 2D, or 3D), flow governing equations, and solution methods. The 1D models are mainly used to predict the outflow hydrograph from the dam breach. Saberi et al. [19] applied the 1D Saint-Venant equation, which is solved by the finite difference method to investigate the outflow hydrograph during dam overtopping failure. Because of the ability to study dam profile evolution and breach formation, 2D models are more applicable than 1D models. Guan et al. [20] and Wu et al. [21] employed both 2D shallow water equations (SWEs) and sediment erosion equations, which are solved by the finite volume method to study the effect of the dam’s geometry parameters on outflow hydrograph and dam profile evolution. Wang et al. [22] also proposed a second-order hybrid-type of total variation diminishing (TVD) finite-difference to estimate the breach outflow by solving the 2D (SWEs). The accuracy of (SWEs) for both vertical flow contraction and surface roughness has been assessed [23]. They noted that the accuracy of (SWEs) is acceptable for milder slopes, but in the case of steeper slopes, modelers should be more careful. Generally, the accuracy of 2D models is still low, especially with velocity distribution over the flow depth, lateral momentum exchange, density-driven flows, and bottom friction [24]. Therefore, 3D models are preferred. Larocque et al. [25] and Yang et al. [26] started to use three-dimensional (3D) models that depend on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations.

      Previous experimental studies concluded that there is no clear relationship between the peak outflow from the dam breach and the initial breach characteristics. Some of these studies depend on the sharp-crested weir fixed at the end of the flume to determine the peak outflow from the breach, which leads to a decrease in the accuracy of outflow calculations at the microscale. The main goals of this study are to carry out a numerical simulation for a spatial dam breach due to overtopping flows by using (FLOW-3D) software to find an empirical equation for the peak outflow discharge from the breach and determine the worst-case that leads to accelerating the dam breaching process.

      2. Numerical simulation

      The current study for spatial dam breach is simulated by using (FLOW-3D) software [27], which is a powerful computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program.

      2.1. Geometric presentations

      A stereolithographic (STL) file is prepared for each change in the initial breach geometry and dimensions. The CAD program is useful for creating solid objects and converting them to STL format, as shown in Fig. 1.

      2.2. Governing equations

      The governing equations for water flow are three-dimensional Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS).

      The continuity equation:(2)∂ui∂xi=0

      The momentum equation:(3)∂ui∂t+1VFuj∂ui∂xj=1ρ∂∂xj-pδij+ν∂ui∂xj+∂uj∂xi-ρu`iu`j¯

      where u is time-averaged velocity,ν is kinematic viscosity, VF is fractional volume open to flow, p is averaged pressure and -u`iu`j¯ are components of Reynold’s stress. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) technique is used to simulate the free surface profile. Hirt et al. [28] presented the VOF algorithm, which employs the function (F) to express the occupancy of each grid cell with fluid. The value of (F) varies from zero to unity. Zero value refers to no fluid in the grid cell, while the unity value refers to the grid cell being fully occupied with fluid. The free surface is formed in the grid cells having (F) values between zero and unity.(4)∂F∂t+1VF∂∂xFAxu+∂∂yFAyv+∂∂zFAzw=0

      where (u, v, w) are the velocity components in (x, y, z) coordinates, respectively, and (AxAyAz) are the area fractions.

      2.3. Boundary and initial conditions

      To improve the accuracy of the results, the boundary conditions should be carefully determined. In this study, two mesh blocks are used to minimize the time consumed in the simulation. The boundary conditions for mesh block 1 are as follows: The inlet and sides boundaries are defined as a wall boundary condition (wall boundary condition is usually used for bound fluid by solid regions. In the case of viscous flows, no-slip means that the tangential velocity is equal to the wall velocity and the normal velocity is zero), the outlet is defined as a symmetry boundary condition (symmetry boundary condition is usually used to reduce computational effort during CFD simulation. This condition allows the flow to be transferred from one mesh block to another. No inputs are required for this boundary condition except that its location should be defined accurately), the bottom boundary is defined as a uniform flow rate boundary condition, and the top boundary is defined as a specific pressure boundary condition with assigned atmospheric pressure. The boundary conditions for mesh block 2 are as follows: The inlet is defined as a symmetry boundary condition, the outlet is defined as a free flow boundary condition, the bottom and sides boundaries are defined as a wall boundary condition, and the top boundary is defined as a specific pressure boundary condition with assigned atmospheric pressure as shown in Fig. 2. The initial conditions required to be set for the fluid (i.e., water) inside of the domain include configuration, temperature, velocities, and pressure distribution. The configuration of water depends on the dimensions and shape of the dam reservoir. While the other conditions have been assigned as follows: temperature is normal water temperature (25 °c) and pressure distribution is hydrostatic with no initial velocity.

      2.4. Numerical method

      FLOW-3D uses the finite volume method (FVM) to solve the governing equation (Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) over the computational domain. A finite-volume method is an Eulerian approach for representing and evaluating partial differential equations in algebraic equations form [29]. At discrete points on the mesh geometry, values are determined. Finite volume expresses a small volume surrounding each node point on a mesh. In this method, the divergence theorem is used to convert volume integrals with a divergence term to surface integrals. After that, these terms are evaluated as fluxes at each finite volume’s surfaces.

      2.5. Turbulent models

      Turbulence is the chaotic, unstable motion of fluids that occurs when there are insufficient stabilizing viscous forces. In FLOW-3D, there are six turbulence models available: the Prandtl mixing length model, the one-equation turbulent energy model, the two-equation (k – ε) model, the Renormalization-Group (RNG) model, the two-equation (k – ω) models, and a large eddy simulation (LES) model. For simulating flow motion, the RNG model is adopted to simulate the motion behavior better than the k – ε and k – ω.

      models [30]. The RNG model consists of two main equations for the turbulent kinetic energy KT and its dissipation.εT(5)∂kT∂t+1VFuAx∂kT∂x+vAy∂kT∂y+wAz∂kT∂z=PT+GT+DiffKT-εT(6)∂εT∂t+1VFuAx∂εT∂x+vAy∂εT∂y+wAz∂εT∂z=C1.εTKTPT+c3.GT+Diffε-c2εT2kT

      where KT is the turbulent kinetic energy, PT is the turbulent kinetic energy production, GT is the buoyancy turbulence energy, εT is the turbulent energy dissipation rate, DiffKT and Diffε are terms of diffusion, c1, c2 and c3 are dimensionless parameters, in which c1 and c3 have a constant value of 1.42 and 0.2, respectively, c2 is computed from the turbulent kinetic energy (KT) and turbulent production (PT) terms.

      2.6. Sediment scour model

      The sediment scour model available in FLOW-3D can calculate all the sediment transport processes including Entrainment transport, Bedload transport, Suspended transport, and Deposition. The erosion process starts once the water flows remove the grains from the packed bed and carry them into suspension. It happens when the applied shear stress by water flows exceeds critical shear stress. This process is represented by entrainment transport in the numerical model. After entrained, the grains carried by water flow are represented by suspended load transport. After that, some suspended grains resort to settling because of the combined effect of gravity, buoyancy, and friction. This process is described through a deposition. Finally, the grains sliding motions are represented by bedload transport in the model. For the entrainment process, the shear stress applied by the fluid motion on the packed bed surface is calculated using the standard wall function as shown in Eq.7.(7)ks,i=Cs,i∗d50

      where ks,i is the Nikuradse roughness and Cs,i is a user-defined coefficient. The critical bed shear stress is defined by a dimensionless parameter called the critical shields number as expressed in Eq.8.(8)θcr,i=τcr,i‖g‖diρi-ρf

      where θcr,i is the critical shields number, τcr,i is the critical bed shear stress, g is the absolute value of gravity acceleration, di is the diameter of the sediment grain, ρi is the density of the sediment species (i) and ρf is the density of the fluid. The value of the critical shields number is determined according to the Soulsby-Whitehouse equation.(9)θcr,i=0.31+1.2d∗,i+0.0551-exp-0.02d∗,i

      where d∗,i is the dimensionless diameter of the sediment, given by Eq.10.(10)d∗,i=diρfρi-ρf‖g‖μf213

      where μf is the fluid dynamic viscosity. For the sloping bed interface, the value of the critical shields number is modified according to Eq.11.(11)θ`cr,i=θcr,icosψsinβ+cos2βtan2φi-sin2ψsin2βtanφi

      where θ`cr,i is the modified critical shields number, φi is the angle of repose for the sediment, β is the angle of bed slope and ψ is the angle between the flow and the upslope direction. The effects of the rolling, hopping, and sliding motions of grains along the packed bed surface are taken by the bedload transport process. The volumetric bedload transport rate (qb,i) per width of the bed is expressed in Eq.12.(12)qb,i=Φi‖g‖ρi-ρfρfdi312

      where Φi is the dimensionless bedload transport rate is calculated by using Meyer Peter and Müller equation.(13)Φi=βMPM,iθi-θ`cr,i1.5cb,i

      where βMPM,i is the Meyer Peter and Müller user-defined coefficient and cb,i is the volume fraction of species i in the bed material. The suspended load transport is calculated as shown in Eq.14.(14)∂Cs,i∂t+∇∙Cs,ius,i=∇∙∇DCs,i

      where Cs,i is the suspended sediment mass concentration, D is the diffusivity, and us,i is the grain velocity of species i. Entrainment and deposition are two opposing processes that take place at the same time. The lifting and settling velocities for both entrainment and deposition processes are calculated according to Eq.15 and Eq.16, respectively.(15)ulifting,i=αid∗,i0.3θi-θ`cr,igdiρiρf-1(16)usettling,i=υfdi10.362+1.049d∗,i3-10.36

      where αi is the entrainment coefficient of species i and υf is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid.

      2.7. Grid type

      Using simple rectangular orthogonal elements in planes and hexahedral in volumes in the (FLOW-3D) program makes the mesh generation process easier, decreases the required memory, and improves numerical accuracy. Two mesh blocks were used in a joined form with a size ratio of 2:1. The first mesh block is coarser, which contains the reservoir water, and the second mesh block is finer, which contains the dam. For achieving accuracy and efficiency in results, the mesh size is determined by using a grid convergence test. The optimum uniform cell size for the first mesh block is 0.012 m and for the second mesh block is 0.006 m.

      2.8. Time step

      The maximum time step size is determined by using a Courant number, which controls the distance that the flow will travel during the simulation time step. In this study, the Courant number was taken equal to 0.25 to prevent the flow from traveling through more than one cell in the time step. Based on the Courant number, a maximum time step value of 0.00075 s was determined.

      2.9. Numerical model validation

      The numerical model accuracy was achieved by comparing the numerical model results with previous experimental results. The experimental study of Schmocker and Hager [7] was based on 31 tests with changes in six parameters (d50, Ho, Bo, Lk, XD, and Qin). All experimental tests were conducted in a straight open glass-sided flume. The horizontal flume has a rectangular cross-section with a width of 0.4 m and a height of 0.7 m. The flume was provided with a flow straightener and an intake with a length of 0.66 m. All tested dams were inserted at various distances (XD) from the intake. Test No.1 from this experimental program was chosen to validate the numerical model. The different parameters used in test No.1 are as follows:

      (1) uniform sediment with a mean diameter (d50 = 0.31 mm), (2) Ho = 0.2 m, (3) Bo = 0.2 m, (4) Lk = 0.1 m,

      (5) XD = 1.0 m, (6) Qin = 6.0 lit/s, (7) Su and Sd = 2:1, (8) mass density (ρs = 2650 kg/m3(9) Homogenous and non-cohesive embankment dam. As shown in Fig. 2, the simulation is contained within a rectangular grid with dimensions: 3.56 m in the x-direction (where 0.66 m is used as inlet, 0.9 m as dam base width, and 1.0 m as outlet), in y-direction 0.2 m (dam length), and in the z-direction 0.3 m, which represents the dam height (0.2 m) with a free distance (0.1 m) above the dam. There are two main reasons that this experimental program is preferred for the validation process. The first reason is that this program deals with homogenous, non-cohesive soil, which is available in FLOW-3D. The second reason is that this program deals with small-scale models which saves time for numerical simulation. Finally, some important assumptions were considered during the validation process. The flow is assumed to be incompressible, viscous, turbulent, and three-dimensional.

      By comparing dam profiles at different time instants for the experimental test with the current numerical model, it appears that the numerical model gives good agreement as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, with an average error percentage of 9% between the experimental results and the numerical model.

      3. Analysis and discussions

      The current model is used to study the effects of different parameters such as (initial breach shapes, dimensions, locations, upstream and downstream dam slopes) on the peak outflow discharge, QP, time of peak outflow, tP, and rate of erosion, E.

      This study consists of a group of scenarios. The first scenario is changing the shapes of the initial breach according to Singh [1], the most predicted shapes are rectangular and V-notch as shown in Fig. 5. The second scenario is changing the initial breach dimensions (i.e., width and depth). While the third scenario is changing the location of the initial breach. Eventually, the last scenario is changing the upstream and downstream dam slopes.

      All scenarios of this study were carried out under the same conditions such as inflow discharge value (Qin=1.0lit/s), dimensions of the tested dam, where dam height (Ho=0.20m), crest width.

      (Lk=0.1m), dam length (Bo=0.20m), and homogenous & non-cohesive soil with a mean diameter (d50=0.31mm).

      3.1. Dam breaching process evolution

      The dam breaching process is a very complex process due to the quick changes in hydrodynamic conditions during dam failure. The dam breaching process starts once water flows reach the downstream face of the dam. During the initial stage of dam breaching, the erosion process is relatively quiet due to low velocities of flow. As water flows continuously, erosion rates increase, especially in two main zones: the crest and the downstream face. As soon as the dam crest is totally eroded, the water levels in the dam reservoir decrease rapidly, accompanied by excessive erosion in the dam body. The erosion process continues until the water levels in the dam reservoir equal the remaining height of the dam.

      According to Zhou et al. [11], the breaching process consists of three main stages. The first stage starts with beginning overtopping flow, then ends when the erosion point directed upstream and reached the inflection point at the inflection time (ti). The second stage starts from the end of the stage1 until the occurrence of peak outflow discharge at the peak outflow time (tP). The third stage starts from the end of the stage2 until the value of outflow discharge becomes the same as the value of inflow discharge at the final time (tf). The outflow discharge from the dam breach increases rapidly during stage1 and stage2 because of the large dam storage capacity (i.e., the dam reservoir is totally full of water) and excessive erosion. While at stage3, the outflow values start to decrease slowly because most of the dam’s storage capacity was run out. The end of stage3 indicates that the dam storage capacity was totally run out, so the outflow equalized with the inflow discharge as shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.

      3.2. The effect of initial breach shape

      To identify the effect of the initial breach shape on the evolution of the dam breaching process. Three tests were carried out with different cross-section areas for each shape. The initial breach is created at the center of the dam crest. Each test had an ID to make the process of arranging data easier. The rectangular shape had an ID (Rec5h & 5b), which means that its depth and width are equal to 5% of the dam height, and the V-notch shape had an ID (V-noch5h & 1:1) which means that its depth is equal to 5% of the dam height and its side slope is equal to 1:1. The comparison between rectangular and V-notch shapes is done by calculating the ratio between maximum dam height at different times (ZMax) to the initial dam height (Ho), rate of erosion, and hydrograph of outflow discharge for each test. The rectangular shape achieves maximum erosion rate and minimum inflection time, in addition to a rapid decrease in the dam reservoir levels. Therefore, the dam breaching is faster in the case of a rectangular shape than in a V-notch shape, which has the same cross-section area as shown in Fig. 8.

      Also, by comparing the hydrograph for each test, the peak outflow discharge value in the case of a rectangular shape is higher than the V-notch shape by 5% and the time of peak outflow for the rectangular shape is shorter than the V-notch shape by 9% as shown in Fig. 9.

      3.3. The effect of initial breach dimensions

      The results of the comparison between the different initial breach shapes indicate that the worst initial breach shape is rectangular, so the second scenario from this study concentrated on studying the effect of a change in the initial rectangular breach dimensions. Groups of tests were carried out with different depths and widths for the rectangular initial breach. The first group had a depth of 5% from the dam height and with three different widths of 5,10, and 15% from the dam height, the second group had a depth of 10% with three different widths of 5,10, and 15%, the third group had a depth of 15% with three different widths of 5,10, and 15% and the final group had a width of 15% with three different heights of 5, 10, and 15% for a rectangular breach shape. The comparison was made as in the previous section to determine the worst case that leads to the quick dam failure as shown in Fig. 10.

      The results show that the (Rec 5 h&15b) test achieves a maximum erosion rate for a shorter period of time and a minimum ratio for (Zmax / Ho) as shown in Fig. 10, which leads to accelerating the dam failure process. The dam breaching process is faster with the minimum initial breach depth and maximum initial breach width. In the case of a minimum initial breach depth, the retained head of water in the dam reservoir is high and the crest width at the bottom of the initial breach (L`K) is small, so the erosion point reaches the inflection point rapidly. While in the case of the maximum initial breach width, the erosion perimeter is large.

      3.4. The effect of initial breach location

      The results of the comparison between the different initial rectangular breach dimensions indicate that the worst initial breach dimension is (Rec 5 h&15b), so the third scenario from this study concentrated on studying the effect of a change in the initial breach location. Three locations were checked to determine the worst case for the dam failure process. The first location is at the center of the dam crest, which was named “Center”, the second location is at mid-distance between the dam center and dam edge, which was named “Mid”, and the third location is at the dam edge, which was named “Edge” as shown in Fig. 11. According to this scenario, the results indicate that the time of peak outflow discharge (tP) is the same in the three cases, but the maximum value of the peak outflow discharge occurs at the center location. The difference in the peak outflow values between the three cases is relatively small as shown in Fig. 12.

      The rates of erosion were also studied for the three cases. The results show that the maximum erosion rate occurs at the center location as shown in Fig. 13. By making a comparison between the three cases for the dam storage volume. The results show that the center location had the minimum values for the dam storage volume, which means that a large amount of water has passed to the downstream area as shown in Fig. 14. According to these results, the center location leads to increased erosion rate and accelerated dam failure process compared with the two other cases. Because the erosion occurs on both sides, but in the case of edge location, the erosion occurs on one side.

      3.5. The effect of upstream and downstream dam slopes

      The results of the comparison between the different initial rectangular breach locations indicate that the worst initial breach location is the center location, so the fourth scenario from this study concentrated on studying the effect of a change in the upstream (Su) and downstream (Sd) dam slopes. Three slopes were checked individually for both upstream and downstream slopes to determine the worst case for the dam failure process. The first slope value is (2H:1V), the second slope value is (2.5H:1V), and the third slope value is (3H:1V). According to this scenario, the results show that the decreasing downstream slope angle leads to increasing time of peak outflow discharge (tP) and decreasing value of peak outflow discharge. The difference in the peak outflow values between the three cases for the downstream slope is 2%, as shown in Fig. 15, but changing the upstream slope has a negligible impact on the peak outflow discharge and its time as shown in Fig. 16.

      The rates of erosion were also studied in the three cases for both upstream and downstream slopes. The results show that the maximum erosion rate increases by 6.0% with an increasing downstream slope angle by 4°, as shown in Fig. 17. The results also indicate that the erosion rates aren’t affected by increasing or decreasing the upstream slope angle, as shown in Fig. 18. According to these results, increasing the downstream slope angle leads to increased erosion rate and accelerated dam failure process compared with the upstream slope angle. Because of increasing shear stress applied by water flows in case of increasing downstream slope.

      According to all previous scenarios, the dimensionless peak outflow discharge QPQin is presented for a fixed dam height (Ho) and inflow discharge (Qin). Fig. 19 illustrates the relationship between QP∗=QPQin and.

      Lr=ho2/3∗bo2/3Ho. The deduced relationship achieves R2=0.96.(17)QP∗=2.2807exp-2.804∗Lr

      4. Conclusions

      A spatial dam breaching process was simulated by using FLOW-3D Software. The validation process was performed by making a comparison between the simulated results of dam profiles and the dam profiles obtained by Schmocker and Hager [7] in their experimental study. And also, the peak outflow value recorded an error percentage of 12% between the numerical model and the experimental study. This model was used to study the effect of initial breach shape, dimensions, location, and dam slopes on peak outflow discharge, time of peak outflow, and the erosion process. By using the parameters obtained from the validation process, the results of this study can be summarized in eight points as follows.1.

      The rectangular initial breach shape leads to an accelerating dam failure process compared with the V-notch.2.

      The value of peak outflow discharge in the case of a rectangular initial breach is higher than the V-notch shape by 5%.3.

      The time of peak outflow discharge for a rectangular initial breach is shorter than the V-notch shape by 9%.4.

      The minimum depth and maximum width for the initial breach achieve maximum erosion rates (increasing breach width, b0, or decreasing breach depth, h0, by 5% from the dam height leads to an increase in the maximum rate of erosion by 11% and 15%, respectively), so the dam failure is rapid.5.

      The center location of the initial breach leads to an accelerating dam failure compared with the edge location.6.

      The initial breach location has a negligible effect on the peak outflow discharge value and its time.7.

      Increasing the downstream slope angle by 4° leads to an increase in both peak outflow discharge and maximum rate of erosion by 2.0% and 6.0%, respectively.8.

      The upstream slope has a negligible effect on the dam breaching process.

      References

      [1]V. SinghDam breach modeling technologySpringer Science & Business Media (1996)Google Scholar[2]Wahl TL. Prediction of embankment dam breach parameters: a literature review and needs assessment. 1998.Google Scholar[3]Z. Alhasan, J. Jandora, J. ŘíhaStudy of dam-break due to overtopping of four small dams in the Czech RepublicActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63 (3) (2015), pp. 717-729 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[4]D. FreadBREACH, an erosion model for earthen dam failures: Hydrologic Research LaboratoryNOAA, National Weather Service (1988)Google Scholar[5]J. Říha, S. Kotaška, L. PetrulaDam Break Modeling in a Cascade of Small Earthen Dams: Case Study of the Čižina River in the Czech RepublicWater, 12 (8) (2020), p. 2309, 10.3390/w12082309 View PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[6]E. Goodarzi, L. Teang Shui, M. ZiaeiDam overtopping risk using probabilistic concepts–Case study: The Meijaran DamIran Ain Shams Eng J, 4 (2) (2013), pp. 185-197ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[7]L. Schmocker, W.H. HagerPlane dike-breach due to overtopping: effects of sediment, dike height and dischargeJ Hydraul Res, 50 (6) (2012), pp. 576-586 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[8]J.S. Walder, R.M. Iverson, J.W. Godt, M. Logan, S.A. SolovitzControls on the breach geometry and flood hydrograph during overtopping of noncohesive earthen damsWater Resour Res, 51 (8) (2015), pp. 6701-6724View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[9]H. Wei, M. Yu, D. Wang, Y. LiOvertopping breaching of river levees constructed with cohesive sedimentsNat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 16 (7) (2016), pp. 1541-1551 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[10]Y. Yang, S.-Y. Cao, K.-J. Yang, W.-P. LiYang K-j, Li W-p. Experimental study of breach process of landslide dams by overtopping and its initiation mechanismsJ Hydrodynamics, 27 (6) (2015), pp. 872-883ArticleDownload PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[11]G.G.D. Zhou, M. Zhou, M.S. Shrestha, D. Song, C.E. Choi, K.F.E. Cui, et al.Experimental investigation on the longitudinal evolution of landslide dam breaching and outburst floodsGeomorphology, 334 (2019), pp. 29-43ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[12]J. Zhang, Z.-x. Guo, S.-y. CaoYang F-g. Experimental study on scour and erosion of blocked damWater Sci Eng, 5 (2012), pp. 219-229ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[13]K. Höeg, A. Løvoll, K. VaskinnStability and breaching of embankment dams: Field tests on 6 m high damsInt J Hydropower Dams, 11 (2004), pp. 88-92View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[14]H. Hakimzadeh, V. Nourani, A.B. AminiGenetic programming simulation of dam breach hydrograph and peak outflow dischargeJ Hydrol Eng, 19 (4) (2014), pp. 757-768View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[15]A.R. Refaiy, N.M. AboulAtta, N.Y. Saad, D.A. El-MollaModeling the effect of downstream drain geometry on seepage through earth damsAin Shams Eng J, 12 (3) (2021), pp. 2511-2531ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[16]Y. Zhu, P.J. Visser, J.K. Vrijling, G. WangExperimental investigation on breaching of embankmentsScience China Technological Sci, 54 (1) (2011), pp. 148-155 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[17]M.-H. Yu, H.-Y. Wei, Y.-J. Liang, Y. ZhaoInvestigation of non-cohesive levee breach by overtopping flowJ Hydrodyn, 25 (4) (2013), pp. 572-579ArticleDownload PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[18]S. Wu, M. Yu, H. Wei, Y. Liang, J. ZengNon-symmetrical levee breaching processes in a channel bend due to overtoppingInt J Sedim Res, 33 (2) (2018), pp. 208-215ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[19]O. Saberi, G. ZenzNumerical investigation on 1D and 2D embankment dams failure due to overtopping flowInt J Hydraulic Engineering, 5 (2016), pp. 9-18View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[20]M. Guan, N.G. Wright, P.A. Sleigh2D Process-Based Morphodynamic Model for Flooding by Noncohesive Dyke BreachJ Hydraul Eng, 140 (7) (2014), p. 04014022, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000861 View PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[21]W. Wu, R. Marsooli, Z. HeDepth-Averaged Two-Dimensional Model of Unsteady Flow and Sediment Transport due to Noncohesive Embankment Break/BreachingJ Hydraul Eng, 138 (6) (2012), pp. 503-516View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[22]Z. Wang, D.S. BowlesThree-dimensional non-cohesive earthen dam breach model. Part 1: Theory and methodologyAdv Water Resour, 29 (10) (2006), pp. 1528-1545ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[23]Říha J, Duchan D, Zachoval Z, Erpicum S, Archambeau P, Pirotton M, et al. Performance of a shallow-water model for simulating flow over trapezoidal broad-crested weirs. J Hydrology Hydromechanics. 2019;67:322-8.Google Scholar[24]C.B. VreugdenhilNumerical methods for shallow-water flowSpringer Science & Business Media (1994)Google Scholar[25]L.A. Larocque, J. Imran, M.H. Chaudhry3D numerical simulation of partial breach dam-break flow using the LES and k–∊ turbulence modelsJ Hydraul Res, 51 (2) (2013), pp. 145-157 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[26]C. Yang, B. Lin, C. Jiang, Y. LiuPredicting near-field dam-break flow and impact force using a 3D modelJ Hydraul Res, 48 (6) (2010), pp. 784-792 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[27]FLOW-3D. Version 11.1.1 Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, NM. https://wwwflow3dcom.Google Scholar[28]C.W. Hirt, B.D. NicholsVolume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundariesJ Comput Phys, 39 (1) (1981), pp. 201-225ArticleDownload PDFGoogle Scholar[29]S.V. PatankarNumerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere PublCorp, New York, 58 (1980), p. 288View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[30]M. Alemi, R. MaiaNumerical simulation of the flow and local scour process around single and complex bridge piersInt J Civil Eng, 16 (5) (2018), pp. 475-487 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar

      Figure 2: Temperature contours and melt pool border lines at different times for the 50 % duty cycle case: (a) - (c) Δtcycle = 400 μs, (d) – (f) Δtcycle = 1000 μs and (g) – (i) Δtcycle = 3000 μs.

      MULTIPHYSICS SIMULATION OF THEMRAL AND FLUID DYNAMICS PHENOMENA DURING THE PULSED LASER POWDER BED FUSION PROCESS OF 316-L STEEL

      M. Bayat* , V. K. Nadimpalli, J. H. Hattel
      1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Produktionstorvet
      425, Kgs. 2800, Lyngby, Denmark

      ABSTRACT

      L-PBF(Laser Powder Bed Fusion)는 다양한 산업 분야에서 많은 관심을 받았으며, 주로 기존 제조 기술을 사용하여 만들 수 없었던 복잡한 토폴로지 최적화 구성 요소를 구현하는 잘 알려진 능력 덕분입니다. . 펄스 L-PBF(PL-PBF)에서 레이저의 시간적 프로파일은 주기 지속 시간과 듀티 주기 중 하나 또는 둘 다를 수정하여 변조할 수 있습니다. 따라서 레이저의 시간적 프로파일은 향후 적용을 위해 이 프로세스를 더 잘 제어할 수 있는 길을 열어주는 새로운 프로세스 매개변수로 간주될 수 있습니다. 따라서 이 작업에서 우리는 레이저의 시간적 프로파일을 변경하는 것이 PL-PBF 공정에서 용융 풀 조건과 트랙의 최종 모양 및 형상에 어떻게 영향을 미칠 수 있는지 조사하는 것을 목표로 합니다. 이와 관련하여 본 논문에서는 CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics) 소프트웨어 패키지인 Flow-3D를 기반으로 하는 316-L 스테인리스강 PL-PBF 공정의 다중물리 수치 모델을 개발하고 이 모델을 사용하여 열과 유체를 시뮬레이션합니다. 다양한 펄스 모드에서 공정 과정 중 용융 풀 내부에서 발생하는 유동 조건. 따라서 고정된 레이저 듀티 사이클(50%)이 있는 레이저 주기 지속 시간이 용융 풀의 모양과 크기 및 최종 트랙 형태에 미치는 영향을 연구하기 위해 매개변수 연구가 수행됩니다. 더 긴 주기 기간에서 더 많은 재료가 더 큰 용융 풀 내에서 변위됨에 따라 용융 풀의 후류에 더 눈에 띄는 혹이 형성되며, 동시에 더 심각한 반동 압력을 받습니다. 또한 시뮬레이션에서 50% 듀티 사이클에서 1000μs에서 형성된 보다 대칭적인 용융 풀과 비교하여 400μs 사이클 주기에서 더 긴 용융 풀이 형성된다는 것이 관찰되었습니다. 풀 볼륨은 1000μs의 경우 더 큽니다. 매개변수 연구는 연속 트랙과 파손된 트랙 PL-PBF 사이의 경계를 설명하며, 여기서 연속 트랙은 항상 소량의 용융 재료를 유지함으로써 유지됩니다.

      English Abstract

      Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) has attracted a lot of attention from various industrial sectors and mainly thanks to its well-proven well-known capacity of realizing complex topology-optimized components that have so far been impossible to make using conventional manufacturing techniques. In Pulsed L-PBF (PL-PBF), the laser’s temporal profile can be modulated via modifying either or both the cycle duration and the duty cycle. Thus, the laser’s temporal profile could be considered as a new process parameter that paves the way for a better control of this process for future applications. Therefore, in this work we aim to investigate how changing the laser’s temporal profile can affect the melt pool conditions and the final shape and geometry of a track in the PL-PBF process. In this respect, in this paper a multiphysics numerical model of the PL-PBF process of 316-L stainless steel is developed based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software package Flow-3D and the model is used to simulate the heat and fluid flow conditions occurring inside the melt pool during the course of the process at different pulsing modes. Thus, a parametric study is carried out to study the influence of the laser’s cycle duration with a fixed laser duty cycle (50 %) on the shape and size of the melt pool and the final track morphology. It is noticed that at longer cycle periods, more noticeable humps form at the wake of the melt pool as more material is displaced within bigger melt pools, which are at the same time subjected to more significant recoil pressures. It is also observed in the simulations that at 50 % duty cycle, longer melt pools form at 400 μs cycle period compared to the more symmetrical melt pools formed at 1000 μs, primarily because of shorter laser off-times in the former, even though melt pool volume is bigger for the 1000 μs case. The parameteric study illustrates the boundary between a continuous track and a broken track PL-PBF wherein the continuous track is retained by always maintaining a small volume of molten material.

      Figure 1: Front and side views of the computational domain. Note that the region along z and from -100 μm to +50 μm is void.
      Figure 1: Front and side views of the computational domain. Note that the region along z and from -100 μm to +50 μm is void.
      Figure 2: Temperature contours and melt pool border lines at different times for the 50 % duty cycle case: (a) - (c) Δtcycle = 400 μs, (d) – (f) Δtcycle = 1000 μs and (g) – (i) Δtcycle = 3000 μs.
      Figure 2: Temperature contours and melt pool border lines at different times for the 50 % duty cycle case: (a) – (c) Δtcycle = 400 μs, (d) – (f) Δtcycle = 1000 μs and (g) – (i) Δtcycle = 3000 μs.
      Figure 3: Plot of melt pool volume versus time for four cases including continuous wave laser as well as 50 % duty cycle at 400 μs, 1000 μs and 3000 μs.
      Figure 3: Plot of melt pool volume versus time for four cases including continuous wave laser as well as 50 % duty cycle at 400 μs, 1000 μs and 3000 μs.

      CONCLUSIONS

      In this work a CFD model of the modulated PL-PBF process of stainless steel 316-L is developed in the commercial software package Flow-3D. The model involves physics such as solidification, melting, evaporation, convection, laser-material interaction, capillarity, Marangoni effect and the recoil pressure effect. In the current study, a parametric study is carried out to understand how the change in the cycle period duration affects the melt pool’s thermo-fluid conditions during the modulated PL-PBF process. It is observed that at the pulse mode with 50 % duty cycle and 400 μs cycle period, an overlapped chain of humps form at the wake of the melt pool and at a spatial frequency of occurrence of about 78 μm. Furthermore and as expected, it is noted that the melt pool volume, the size of the hump as well as the crater size at the end of the track, increase with increase in the cycle period duration, as more material is re-deposited at the back of the melt pool and that itself is caused by more pronounced recoil pressures. Moreover, it is noticed that due to the short off-time period of the laser in the 400 μs cycle period case, there is always an amount of liquid metal left from the previous cycle, at the time the new cycle starts. This is found to be the main reason why longer and elongated melt pools form at 400 μs cycle period, compared to the bigger, shorter and more symmetrical-like melt pools forming at the 1000 μs case. In this study PL-PBF single tracks including the broken track and the continuous track examples were studied to illustrate the boundary of this transition at a given laser scan parameter setting. At higher scan speeds, it is expected that the Plateau–Rayleigh instability will compete with the pulsing behavior to change the transition boundary between a broken and continuous track, which is suggested as future work from this study.

      REFERENCES

      [1] T. Craeghs, L. Thijs, F. Verhaeghe, J.-P. Kruth, J. Van Humbeeck, A study of the microstructural
      evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V, Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 3303–3312.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004.
      [2] J. Liu, A.T. Gaynor, S. Chen, Z. Kang, K. Suresh, A. Takezawa, L. Li, J. Kato, J. Tang, C.C.L. Wang, L.
      Cheng, X. Liang, A.C. To, Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing,
      (2018) 2457–2483.
      [3] M. Bayat, W. Dong, J. Thorborg, A.C. To, J.H. Hattel, A review of multi-scale and multi-physics
      simulations of metal additive manufacturing processes with focus on modeling strategies, Addit. Manuf.
      47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102278.
      [4] A. Foroozmehr, M. Badrossamay, E. Foroozmehr, S. Golabi, Finite Element Simulation of Selective Laser
      Melting process considering Optical Penetration Depth of laser in powder bed, Mater. Des. 89 (2016)
      255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.002.
      [5] Y.S. Lee, W. Zhang, Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base
      superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion, Addit. Manuf. 12 (2016) 178–188.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.003.
      [6] S.A. Khairallah, A.T. Anderson, A. Rubenchik, W.E. King, Laser powder-bed fusion additive
      manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation
      zones, Acta Mater. 108 (2016) 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014.
      [7] M. Bayat, A. Thanki, S. Mohanty, A. Witvrouw, S. Yang, J. Thorborg, N.S. Tiedje, J.H. Hattel, Keyholeinduced porosities in Laser-based Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) of Ti6Al4V: High-fidelity modelling and
      experimental validation, Addit. Manuf. 30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100835.
      [8] A. Charles, M. Bayat, A. Elkaseer, L. Thijs, J.H. Hattel, S. Scholz, Elucidation of dross formation in laser
      powder bed fusion at down-facing surfaces: phenomenon-oriented multiphysics simulation and
      experimental validation, Addit. Manuf. Under revi (2021).
      [9] M. Bayat, V.K. Nadimpalli, D.B. Pedersen, J.H. Hattel, A fundamental investigation of thermo-capillarity
      in laser powder bed fusion of metals and alloys, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 166 (2021) 120766.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120766.
      [10] J.D. Roehling, S.A. Khairallah, Y. Shen, A. Bayramian, C.D. Boley, A.M. Rubenchik, J. Demuth, N.
      Duanmu, M.J. Matthews, Physics of large-area pulsed laser powder bed fusion, Addit. Manuf. 46 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102186.
      [11] M. Zheng, L. Wei, J. Chen, Q. Zhang, J. Li, S. Sui, G. Wang, W. Huang, Surface morphology evolution
      during pulsed selective laser melting: Numerical and experimental investigations, Appl. Surf. Sci. 496
      (2019) 143649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143649.
      [12] M. Bayat, V.K. Nadimpalli, D.B. Pedersen, J.H. Hattel, A fundamental investigation of thermo-capillarity
      in laser powder bed fusion of metals and alloys, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 166 (2021).
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120766.

      Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions.

      Experimental and numerical study of flow at a 90 degree lateral turnout with enhanced roughness coefficient and invert level changes

      조도 계수 및 역전 수준 변화가 개선된 90도 측면 분출구에서의 유동에 대한 실험적 및 수치적 연구

      Maryam BagheriSeyed M. Ali ZomorodianMasih ZolghadrH. Md. AzamathullaC. Venkata Siva Rama Prasad

      Abstract

      측면 분기기(흡입구)의 상류 측에서 흐름 분리는 분기기 입구에서 와류를 일으키는 중요한 문제입니다. 이는 흐름의 유효 폭, 출력 용량 및 효율성을 감소시킵니다. 따라서 분리지대의 크기를 파악하고 크기를 줄이기 위한 방안을 제시하는 것이 필수적이다. 본 연구에서는 분리 구역의 치수를 줄이기 위한 방법으로 7가지 유형의 거칠기 요소를 분기구 입구에 설치하고 4가지 다른 배출(총 84번의 실험을 수행)과 함께 3개의 서로 다른 베드 반전 레벨을 조사했습니다. 또한 3D CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics) 모델을 사용하여 분리 영역의 흐름 패턴과 치수를 평가했습니다. 결과는 거칠기 계수를 향상시키면 분리 영역 치수를 최대 38%까지 줄일 수 있는 반면, 드롭 구현 효과는 사용된 거칠기 계수를 기반으로 이 영역을 다르게 축소할 수 있음을 보여주었습니다. 두 가지 방법을 결합하면 분리 영역 치수를 최대 63%까지 줄일 수 있습니다.

      Flow separation at the upstream side of lateral turnouts (intakes) is a critical issue causing eddy currents at the turnout entrance. It reduces the effective width of flow, turnout capacity and efficiency. Therefore, it is essential to identify the dimensions of the separation zone and propose remedies to reduce its dimensions. Installation of 7 types of roughening elements at the turnout entrance and 3 different bed invert levels, with 4 different discharges (making a total of 84 experiments) were examined in this study as a method to reduce the dimensions of the separation zone. Additionally, a 3-D Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model was utilized to evaluate the flow pattern and dimensions of the separation zone. Results showed that enhancing the roughness coefficient can reduce the separation zone dimensions up to 38% while the drop implementation effect can scale down this area differently based on the roughness coefficient used. Combining both methods can reduce the separation zone dimensions up to 63%.

      HIGHLIGHTS

      Listen

      • Flow separation at the upstream side of lateral turnouts (intakes) is a critical issue causing eddy currents at the turnout entrance.
      • Installation of 7 types of roughening elements at the turnout entrance and 3 different bed level inverts were investigated.
      • Additionally, a 3-D Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model was utilized to evaluate the flow.
      • Combining both methods can reduce the separation zone dimensions by up to 63%.
      Experimental and numerical study of flow at a 90 degree lateral turnout with enhanced roughness coefficient and invert level changes
      Experimental and numerical study of flow at a 90 degree lateral turnout with enhanced roughness coefficient and invert level changes

      Keywords

      discharge ratioflow separation zoneintakethree dimensional simulation

      INTRODUCTION

      Listen

      Turnouts or intakes are amongst the oldest and most widely used hydraulic structures in irrigation networks. Turnouts are also used in water distribution, transmission networks, power generation facilities, and waste water treatment plants etc. The flows that enter a turnout have a strong momentum in the direction of the main waterway and that is why flow separation occurs inside the turnout. The horizontal vortex formed in the separation area is a suitable place for accumulation and deposition of sediments. The separation zone is a vulnerable area for sedimentation and for reduction of effective flow due to a contracted flow region in the lateral channel. Sedimentaion in the entrance of the intake can gradually be transfered into the lateral channel and decrease the capacity of the higher order channels over time (Jalili et al. 2011). On the other hand, the existence of coarse-grained materials causes erosion and destruction of the waterway side walls and bottom. In addition, sedimentation creates conditions for vegetation to take root and damage the waterway cover, which causes water to leak from its perimeter. Therefore, it is important to investigate the pattern of the flow separation area in turnouts and provide solutions to reduce the dimensions of this area.

      The three-dimensional flow structure at turnouts is quite complex. In an experimental study by Neary & Odgaard (1993) in a 90-degree water turnout it was found that the secondary currents and separation zone varies from the bed to the water surface. They also found that at a 90-degree water turnout, the bed roughness and discharge ratio play a critical role in flow structure. They asserted that an explanation of sediment behavior at a diversion entrance requires a comprehensive understanding of 3D flow patterns around the lateral-channel entrance. In addition, they suggested that there is a strong similarity between flow in a channel bend and a diversion channel, and that this similarity can rationalize the use of bend flow models for estimation of 3D flow structures in diversion channels.

      Some of the distinctive characteristics of dividing flow in a turnout include a zone of separation immediately near the entrance of the lateral turnout (separation zone), a contracted flow region in the branch channel (contracted flow), and a stagnation point near the downstream corner of the junction (stagnation zone). In the region downstream of the junction, along the continuous far wall, separation due to flow expansion may occur (Ramamurthy et al. 2007), that is, a separation zone. This can both reduce the turnout efficiency and the effective width of flow while increasing the sediment deposition in the turnout entrance (Jalili et al. 2011). Installation of submerged vanes in the turnout entrance is a method which is already applied to reduce the size of flow separation zones. The separation zone draws sediments and floating materials into themselves. This reduces effective cross-section area and reduces transmission capacity. These results have also been obtained in past studies, including by Ramamurthy et al. (2007) and in Jalili et al. (2011). Submerged vanes (Iowa vanes) are designed in order to modify the near-bed flow pattern and bed-sediment motion in the transverse direction of the river. The vanes are installed vertically on the channel bed, at an angle of attack which is usually oriented at 10–25 degrees to the local primary flow direction. Vane height is typically 0.2–0.5 times the local water depth during design flow conditions and vane length is 2–3 times its height (Odgaard & Wang 1991). They are vortex-generating devices that generate secondary circulation, thereby redistributing sediment within the channel cross section. Several factors affect the flow separation zone such as the ratio of lateral turnout discharge to main channel discharge, angle of lateral channel with respect to the main channel flow direction and size of applied submerged vanes. Nakato et al. (1990) found that sediment management using submerged vanes in the turnout entrance to Station 3 of the Council Bluffs plant, located on the Missouri River, is applicable and efficient. The results show submerged vanes are an appropriate solution for reduction of sediment deposition in a turnout entrance. The flow was treated as 3D and tests results were obtained for the flow characteristics of dividing flows in a 90-degree sharp-edged, junction. The main and lateral channel were rectangular with the same dimensions (Ramamurthy et al., 2007).

      Keshavarzi & Habibi (2005) carried out experiments on intake with angles of 45, 67, 79 and 90 degrees in different discharge ratios and reported the optimum angle for inlet flow with the lowest flow separation area to be about 55 degrees. The predicted flow characteristics were validated using experimental data. The results indicated that the width and length of the separation zone increases with the increase in the discharge ratio Qr (ratio of outflow per unit width in the turnout to inflow per unit width in the main channel).

      Abbasi et al. (2004) performed experiments to investigate the dimensions of the flow separation zone at a lateral turnout entrance. They demonstrated that the length and width of the separation zone decreases with the increasing ratio of lateral turn-out discharge. They also found that with a reducing angle of lateral turnout, the length of the separation zone scales up and width of separation zone reduces. Then they compared their observations with results of Kasthuri & Pundarikanthan (1987) who conducted some experiments in an open-channel junction formed by channels of equal width and an angle of lateral 90 degree turnout, which showed the dimensions of the separation zone in their experiments to be smaller than in previous studies. Kasthuri & Pundarikanthan (1987) studied vortex and flow separation dimensions at the entrance of a 90 degree channel. Results showed that increasing the diversion discharge ratio can reduce the length and width of the vortex area. They also showed that the length and width of the vortex area remain constant at diversion ratios greater than 0.7. Karami Moghaddam & Keshavarzi (2007) analyzed the flow characteristics in turnouts with angles of 55 and 90 degrees. They reported that the dimensions of the separation zone decrease by increasing the discharge ratio and reducing the turnout angle with respect to the main channel. Studies about flow separation zone can be found in Jalili et al. (2011)Nikbin & Borghei (2011)Seyedian et al. (2008).

      Jamshidi et al. (2016) measured the dimensions of a flow separation zone in the presence of submerged vanes with five arrangements (parallel, stagger, compound, piney and butterflies). Results showed that the ratio of the width to the length of the separation zone (shape index) was between 0.2 and 0.28 for all arrangements.

      Karami et al. (2017) developed a 3D computational fluid dynamic (CFD) code which was calibrated by measured data. They used the model to evaluate flow pattern, diversion ratio of discharge, strength of the secondary flow, and dimensions of the vortex inside the channel in various dikes and submerged vane installation scenarios. Results showed that the diversion ratio of discharge in the diversion channel is dependent on the width of the flow separation area in the main channel. A dike, perpendicular to the flow, doubles the ratio of diverted discharge and reduces the suspended sediment load compared with the base-line situation by creating outer arch conditions. In addition, increasing the longitudinal distance between vanes increases the velocity gradient between the vanes and leads to a more severe erosion of the bed near the vanes.Figure 1VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

      Laboratory channel dimensions.

      Al-Zubaidy & Hilo (2021) used the Navier–Stokes equation to study the flow of incompressible fluids. Using the CFD software ANSYS Fluent 19.2, 3D flow patterns were simulated at a diversion channel. Their results showed good agreement using the comparison between the experimental and numerical results when the k-omega turbulence viscous model was employed. Simulation of the flow pattern was then done at the lateral channel junction using a variety of geometry designs. These improvements included changing the intake’s inclination angle and chamfering and rounding the inner corner of the intake mouth instead of the sharp edge. Flow parameters at the diversion including velocity streamlines, bed shear stress, and separation zone dimensions were computed in their study. The findings demonstrated that changing the 90° lateral intake geometry can improve the flow pattern and bed shear stress at the intake junction. Consequently, sedimentation and erosion problems are reduced. According to the conclusions of their study, a branching angle of 30° to 45° is the best configuration for increasing branching channel discharge, lowering branching channel sediment concentration.

      The review of the literature shows that most of the studies deal with turnout angle, discharge ratio and implementation of vanes as techniques to reduce the area of the separation zone. This study examines the effect of roughness coefficient and drop implementation at the entrance of a 90-degree lateral turnout on the dimensions of the separation zone. As far as the authors are aware, these two variables have never been studied as a remedy to decrease the separation zone dimensions whilst enhancing turnout efficiency. Additionally, a three-dimensional numerical model is applied to simulate the flow pattern around the turnout. The numerical results are verified against experimental data.

      METHOD

      Experimental setup

      Listen

      The experiments were conducted in a 90 degree dividing flow laboratory channel. The main channel is 15 m long, 0.5 m wide and 0.4 m high and the branch channel is 3 m long, 0.35 m wide and 0.4 m high, as shown in Figure 1. The tests were carried out at 9.65 m from the beginning of the flume and were far enough from the inlet, so we were sure that the flow was fully developed. According to Kirkgöz & Ardiçlioğlu (1997) the length of the developing region would be approximantly 65 and 72 times the flow depth. In this study, the depth is 9 cm, which makes this condition.

      Both the main and lateral channel had a slope of 0.0003 with side walls of concrete. A 100 hp pump discharged the water into a stilling basin at the entrance of the main flume. The discharge was measured using an ultrasonic discharge meter around the discharge pipe. Eighty-four experiments in total were carried out at range of 0.1<Fr<0.4 (Froude numbers in main channel and upstream of turnout). The depth of water in the main channel in the experiments was 9 cm, in which case the effect of surface tension can be considered; according to research by Zolghadr & Shafai Bejestan (2020) and Zolghadr et al. (2021), when the water depth is more than 6 cm, the effect of surface tension is reduced and can be ignored given that the separation phenomenon occurs in the boundary layer, the height of the roughness creates disturbances in growth and development of the boundary layer and, as a result, separation growth is also faced with disruption and its dimensions grow less compared to smooth surfaces. Similar conditions occur in case of drop implementation. A disturbance occurs in the growth of the boundary layer and as a result the separation zone dimensions decrease. In order to investigate the effect of roughness coefficient and drop implementation on the separation zone dimensions, four different discharges (16, 18, 21, 23 l/s) in subcritical conditions, seven Manning (Strickler) roughness coefficients (0.009, 0.011, 0.0