하류하천의 영향 최소화를 위한 보조 여수로 최적 활용방안 검토

The Optimal Operation on Auxiliary Spillway to Minimize the Flood Damage in Downstream River with Various Outflow Conditions

하류하천의 영향 최소화를 위한 보조 여수로 최적 활용방안 검토

Hyung Ju Yoo1, Sung Sik Joo2, Beom Jae Kwon3, Seung Oh Lee4*

유 형주1, 주 성식2, 권 범재3, 이 승오4*

1Ph.D Student, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University
2Director, Water Resources & Environment Department, HECOREA
3Director, Water Resources Department, ISAN
4Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University

1홍익대학교 건설환경공학과 박사과정
2㈜헥코리아 수자원환경사업부 이사
3㈜이산 수자원부 이사
4홍익대학교 건설환경공학과 교수

ABSTRACT

최근 기후변화로 인해 강우강도 및 빈도의 증가에 따른 집중호우의 영향 및 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 홍수 시 하류 하천의 영향을 최소화할 수 있는 보조 여수로 활용방안 구축이 필요한 실정이다. 이를 위해, 수리모형 실험 및 수치모형 실험을 통하여 보조 여수로 운영에 따른 흐름특성 변화 검토에 관한 연구가 많이 진행되어 왔다. 그러나 대부분의 연구는 여수로에서의 흐름특성 및 기능성에 대한 검토를 수행하였을 뿐 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 따른 하류하천 영향 검토 및 호안 안정성 검토에 관한 연구는 미비한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 방류 조건에 따른 하류영향 분석 및 호안 안정성 측면에서 최적 방류 시나리오 검토를 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 사용하여 검토하였다. 또한 FLOW-3D 수치모의 수행을 통한 유속, 수위 결과와 소류력 산정 결과를 호안 설계허용 기준과 비교하였다. 수문 완전 개도 조건으로 가정하고 계획홍수량 유입 시 다양한 보조 여수로 활용방안에 대하여 수치모의를 수행한 결과, 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 기존 여수로 단독운영에 비하여 최대유속 및 최대 수위의 감소효과를 확인하였다. 다만 계획홍수량의 45% 이하 방류 조건에서 대안부의 호안 안정성을 확보하였고 해당 방류량 초과 경우에는 처오름 현상이 발생하여 월류에 대한 위험성 증가를 확인하였다. 따라서 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 방안 도출이 중요하다고 판단하였다. 여수로의 배분 비율 및 총 허용 방류량에 대하여 검토한 결과 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량보다 큰 경우 하류하천의 흐름이 중심으로 집중되어 대안부의 유속 저감 및 수위 감소를 확인하였고, 계획 홍수량의 77% 이하의 조건에서 호안의 허용 유속 및 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하였다. 이를 통하여 본 연구에서 제안한 보조 여수로 활용방안으로는 기존 여수로와 동시 운영 시 총 방류량에 대하여 보조 여수로의 배분량이 기존 여수로의 배분량보다 크게 설정하는 것이 하류하천의 영향을 최소화 할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 본 연구는 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서의 영향에 대해서만 검토하였고 수문 전면 개도 조건에서 검토하였다는 한계점은 분명히 있다. 이에 향후에는 다양한 수문 개도 조건 및 방류 시나리오를 적용 및 검토한다면 보다 효율적이고, 효과적인 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출이 가능할 것으로 기대 된다.

키워드 : 보조 여수로, FLOW-3D, 수치모의, 호안 안정성, 소류력

1. 서 론

최근 기후변화로 인한 집중호우의 영향으로 홍수 시 댐으로 유입되는 홍수량이 설계 홍수량보다 증가하여 댐 안정성 확보가 필요한 실정이다(Office for Government Policy Coordination, 2003). MOLIT & K-water(2004)에서는 기존댐의 수문학적 안정성 검토를 수행하였으며 이상홍수 발생 시 24개 댐에서 월류 등으로 인한 붕괴위험으로 댐 하류지역의 극심한 피해를 예상하여 보조여수로 신설 및 기존여수로 확장 등 치수능력 증대 기본계획을 수립하였고 이를 통하여 극한홍수 발생 시 홍수량 배제능력을 증대하여 기존댐의 안전성 확보 및 하류지역의 피해를 방지하고자 하였다. 여기서 보조 여수로는 기존 여수로와 동시 또는 별도 운영하는 여수로로써 비상상황 시 방류 기능을 포함하고 있고(K-water, 2021), 최근에는 기존 여수로의 노후화에 따라 보조여수로의 활용방안에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 3차원 수치해석을 수행하여 기존 및 보조 여수로의 방류량 조합에 따른 하류 영향을 분석하고 하류 호안 안정성 측면에서 최적 방류 시나리오를 검토하고자 한다.

기존의 댐 여수로 검토에 관한 연구는 주로 수리실험을 통하여 방류조건 별 흐름특성을 검토하였으나 최근에는 수치모형 실험결과가 수리모형실험과 비교하여 근사한 것을 확인하는 등 점차 수치모형실험을 수리모형실험의 대안으로 활용하고 있다(Jeon et al., 2006; Kim, 2007; Kim et al., 2008). 국내의 경우, Jeon et al.(2006)은 수리모형 실험과 수치모의를 이용하여 임하댐 바상여수로의 기본설계안을 도출하였고, Kim et al.(2008)은 가능최대홍수량 유입 시 비상여수로 방류에 따른 수리학적 안정성과 기능성을 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 활용하여 검토하였다. 또한 Kim and Kim(2013)은 충주댐의 홍수조절 효과 검토 및 방류량 변화에 따른 상·하류의 수위 변화를 수치모형을 통하여 검토하였다. 국외의 경우 Zeng et al.(2017)은 3차원 수치모형인 Fluent를 활용한 여수로 방류에 따른 흐름특성 결과와 측정결과를 비교하여 수치모형 결과의 신뢰성을 검토하였다. Li et al.(2011)은 가능 최대 홍수량(Probable Maximum Flood, PMF)조건에서 기존 여수로와 신규 보조 여수로 유입부 주변의 흐름특성에 대하여 3차원 수치모형 Fluent를 활용하여 검토하였고, Lee et al.(2019)는 서로 근접해있는 기존 여수로와 보조여수로 동시 운영 시 방류능 검토를 수리모형 실험 및 수치모형 실험(FLOW-3D)을 통하여 수행하였으며 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로를 동시운영하게 되면 배수로 간섭으로 인하여 총 방류량이 7.6%까지 감소되어 댐의 방류능력이 감소하였음을 확인하였다.

그러나 대부분의 여수로 검토에 대한 연구는 여수로 내에서의 흐름특성 및 기능성에 대한 검토를 수행하였고. 이에 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류운영에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 변화 및 호안 안정성 평가에 관한 추가적인 검토가 필요한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 방류 조건에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 호안 안정성분석을 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 이용하여 검토하였다. 또한 다양한 방류 배분 비율 및 허용 방류량 조건 변화에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력 분석결과를 호안 설계 허용유속 및 허용 소류력 기준과 비교하여 하류하천의 영향을 최소화 할 수 있는 최적의 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출하고자 한다.

2. 본 론

2.1 이론적 배경

2.1.1 3차원 수치모형의 기본이론

FLOW-3D는 미국 Flow Science, Inc에서 개발한 범용 유체역학 프로그램(CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics)으로 자유 수면을 갖는 흐름모의에 사용되는 3차원 수치해석 모형이다. 난류모형을 통해 난류 해석이 가능하고, 댐 방류에 따른 하류 하천의 흐름 해석에도 많이 사용되어 왔다(Flow Science, 2011). 본 연구에서는 FLOW-3D(version 12.0)을 이용하여 홍수 시 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대한 검토를 하류하천의 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토하였다.

2.1.2 유동해석의 지배방정식

1) 연속 방정식(Continuity Equation)

FLOW-3D는 비압축성 유체에 대하여 연속방정식을 사용하며, 밀도는 상수항으로 적용된다. 연속 방정식은 Eqs. (1), (2)와 같다.

(1)

∇·v=0

(2)

∂∂x(uAx)+∂∂y(vAy)+∂∂z(wAz)=RSORρ

여기서, ρ는 유체 밀도(kg/m3), u, v, w는 x, y, z방향의 유속(m/s), Ax, Ay, Az는 각 방향의 요소면적(m2), RSOR는 질량 생성/소멸(mass source/sink)항을 의미한다.

2) 운동량 방정식(Momentum Equation)

각 방향 속도성분 u, v, w에 대한 운동방정식은 Navier-Stokes 방정식으로 다음 Eqs. (3), (4), (5)와 같다.

(3)

∂u∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂x+Gx+fx-bx-RSORρVFu

(4)

∂v∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂y+Gy+fy-by-RSORρVFv

(5)

∂w∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂z+Gz+fz-bz-RSORρVFw

여기서, Gx, Gy, Gz는 체적력에 의한 가속항, fx, fy, fz는 점성에 의한 가속항, bx, by, bz는 다공성 매체에서의 흐름손실을 의미한다.

2.1.3 소류력 산정

호안설계 시 제방사면 호안의 안정성 확보를 위해서는 하천의 흐름에 의하여 호안에 작용하는 소류력에 저항할 수 있는 재료 및 공법 선택이 필요하다. 국내의 경우 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)에서 계획홍수량 유하 시 소류력 산정 방법을 제시하고 있다. 소류력은 하천의 평균유속을 이용하여 산정할 수 있으며, 소류력 산정식은 Eqs. (6), (7)과 같다.

1) Schoklitsch 공식

Schoklitsch(1934)는 Chezy 유속계수를 적용하여 소류력을 산정하였다.

(6)

τ=γRI=γC2V2

여기서, τ는 소류력(N/m2), R은 동수반경(m), γ는 물의 단위중량(10.0 kN/m3), I는 에너지경사, C는 Chezy 유속계수, V는 평균유속(m/s)을 의미한다.

2) Manning 조도계수를 고려한 공식

Chezy 유속계수를 대신하여 Manning의 조도계수를 고려하여 소류력을 산정할 수 있다.

(7)

τ=γn2V2R1/3

여기서, τ는 소류력(N/m2), R은 동수반경(m), γ는 물의 단위중량(10.0 kN/m3), n은 Manning의 조도계수, V는 평균유속(m/s)을 의미한다.

FLOW-3D 수치모의 수행을 통하여 하천의 바닥 유속을 도출할 수 있으며, 본 연구에서는 Maning 조도계수롤 고려하여 소류력을 산정하고자 한다. 소류력을 산정하기 위해서 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부의 바닥유속 변화를 검토하여 최대 유속 값을 이용하였다. 최종적으로 산정한 소류력과 호안의 재료 및 공법에 따른 허용 소류력과 비교하여 제방사면 호안의 안정성 검토를 수행하게 된다.

2.2 하천호안 설계기준

하천 호안은 계획홍수위 이하의 유수작용에 대하여 안정성이 확보되도록 계획하여야 하며, 호안의 설계 시에는 사용재료의 확보용이성, 시공상의 용이성, 세굴에 대한 굴요성(flexibility) 등을 고려하여 호안의 형태, 시공방법 등을 결정한다(MOLIT, 2019). 국내의 경우, 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)에서는 다양한 호안공법에 대하여 비탈경사에 따라 설계 유속을 비교하거나, 허용 소류력을 비교함으로써 호안의 안정성을 평가한다. 호안에 대한 국외의 설계기준으로 미국의 경우, ASTM(미국재료시험학회)에서 호안블록 및 식생매트 시험방법을 제시하였고 제품별로 ASTM 시험에 의한 허용유속 및 허용 소류력을 제시하였다. 일본의 경우, 호안 블록에 대한 축소실험을 통하여 항력을 측정하고 이를 통해서 호안 블록에 대한 항력계수를 제시하고 있다. 설계 시에는 항력계수에 의한 블록의 안정성을 평가하고 있으나, 최근에는 세굴의 영향을 고려할 수 있는 호안 안정성 평가의 필요성을 제기하고 있다(MOLIT, 2019). 관련된 국내·외의 하천호안 설계기준은 Table 1에 정리하여 제시하였고, 본 연구에서 하천 호안 안정성 평가 시 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)과 ASTM 시험에서 제시한 허용소류력 및 허용유속 기준을 비교하여 각각 0.28 kN/m2, 5.0 m/s 미만일 경우 호안 안정성을 확보하였다고 판단하였다.

Table 1.

Standard of Permissible Velocity and Shear on Revetment

Country (Reference)MaterialPermissible velocity (Vp, m/s)Permissible Shear (τp, kN/m2)
KoreaRiver Construction Design Practice Guidelines
(MOLIT, 2016)		Vegetated5.00.50
Stone5.00.80
USAASTM D’6460Vegetated6.10.81
Unvegetated5.00.28
JAPANDynamic Design Method of Revetment–5.0–

2.3. 보조여수로 운영에 따른 하류하천 영향 분석

2.3.1 모형의 구축 및 경계조건

본 연구에서는 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 홍수 시 보조여수로의 활용방안에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 호안안정성 평가를 수행하기 위해 FLOW-3D 모형을 이용하였다. 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로는 치수능력 증대사업(MOLIT & K-water, 2004)을 통하여 완공된 ○○댐의 제원을 이용하여 구축하였다. ○○댐은 설계빈도(100년) 및 200년빈도 까지는 계획홍수위 이내로 기존 여수로를 통하여 운영이 가능하나 그 이상 홍수조절은 보조여수로를 통하여 조절해야 하며, 또한 2011년 기존 여수로 정밀안전진단 결과 사면의 표층 유실 및 옹벽 밀림현상 등이 확인되어 노후화에 따른 보수·보강이 필요한 상태이다. 이에 보조여수로의 활용방안 검토가 필요한 것으로 판단하여 본 연구의 대상댐으로 선정하였다. 하류 하천의 흐름특성을 예측하기 위하여 격자간격을 0.99 ~ 8.16 m의 크기로 하여 총 격자수는 49,102,500개로 구성하였으며, 여수로 방류에 따른 하류하천의 흐름해석을 위한 경계조건으로 상류는 유입유량(inflow), 바닥은 벽면(wall), 하류는 수위(water surface elevation)조건으로 적용하도록 하였다(Table 2, Fig. 1 참조). FLOW-3D 난류모형에는 혼합길이 모형, 난류에너지 모형, k-ϵ모형, RNG(Renormalized Group Theory) k-ϵ모형, LES 모형 등이 있으며, 본 연구에서는 여수로 방류에 따른 복잡한 난류 흐름 및 높은 전단흐름을 정확하게 모의(Flow Science, 2011)할 수 있는 RNG k-ϵ모형을 사용하였고, 하류하천 호안의 안정성 측면에서 보조여수로의 활용방안을 검토하기 위하여 방류시나리오는 Table 3에 제시된 것 같이 설정하였다. Case 1 및 Case 2를 통하여 계획홍수량에 대하여 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 단독 운영이 하류하천에 미치는 영향을 확인하였고 보조 여수로의 방류량 조절을 통하여 호안 안정성 측면에서 보조 여수로 방류능 검토를 수행하였다(Case 3 ~ Case 6). 또한 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분에 따른 하류하천의 영향 검토(Case 7 ~ Case 10) 및 방류 배분에 따른 허용 방류량을 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토를 수행하였다(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

수문은 완전개도 조건으로 가정하였으며 하류하천의 계획홍수량에 대한 기존 여수로와 보조여수로의 배분량을 조절하여 모의를 수행하였다. 여수로는 콘크리트의 조도계수 값(Chow, 1959)을 채택하였고, 댐 하류하천의 조도계수는 하천기본계획(Busan Construction and Management Administration, 2009) 제시된 조도계수 값을 채택하였으며 FLOW-3D의 적용을 위하여 Manning-Strickler 공식(Vanoni, 2006)을 이용하여 조도계수를 조고값으로 변환하여 사용하였다. Manning-Strickler 공식은 Eq. (8)과 같으며, FLOW-3D에 적용한 조도계수 및 조고는 Table 4와 같다.

(8)

n=ks1/68.1g1/2

여기서, kS는 조고 (m), n은 Manning의 조도계수, g는 중력가속도(m/s2)를 의미한다.

시간에 따라 동일한 유량이 일정하게 유입되도록 모의를 수행하였으며, 시간간격(Time Step)은 0.0001초로 설정(CFL number < 1.0) 하였다. 또한 여수로 수문을 통한 유량의 변동 값이 1.0%이내일 경우는 연속방정식을 만족하고 있다고 가정하였다. 이는, 유량의 변동 값이 1.0%이내일 경우 유속의 변동 값 역시 1.0%이내이며, 수치모의 결과 1.0%의 유속변동은 호안의 유속설계기준에 크게 영향을 미치지 않는다고 판단하였다. 그 결과 모든 수치모의 Case에서 2400초 이내에 결과 값이 수렴하는 것을 확인하였다.

Table 2.

Mesh sizes and numerical conditions

MeshNumbers49,102,500 EA
Increment (m)DirectionExisting SpillwayAuxiliary Spillway
∆X0.99 ~ 4.301.00 ~ 4.30
∆Y0.99 ~ 8.161.00 ~ 5.90
∆Z0.50 ~ 1.220.50 ~ 2.00
Boundary ConditionsXmin / YmaxInflow / Water Surface Elevation
Xmax, Ymin, Zmin / ZmaxWall / Symmetry
Turbulence ModelRNG model
Table 3.

Case of numerical simulation (Qp : Design flood discharge)

CaseExisting Spillway (Qe, m3/s)Auxiliary Spillway (Qa, m3/s)Remarks
1Qp0Reference case
20Qp
300.58QpReview of discharge capacity on
auxiliary spillway
400.48Qp
500.45Qp
600.32Qp
70.50Qp0.50QpDetermination of optimal division
ratio on Spillways
80.61Qp0.39Qp
90.39Qp0.61Qp
100.42Qp0.58Qp
110.32Qp0.45QpDetermination of permissible
division on Spillways
120.35Qp0.48Qp
130.38Qp0.53Qp
140.41Qp0.56Qp
Table 4.

Roughness coefficient and roughness height

CriteriaRoughness coefficient (n)Roughness height (ks, m)
Structure (Concrete)0.0140.00061
River0.0330.10496
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F1.jpg
Fig. 1

Layout of spillway and river in this study

2.3.2 보조 여수로의 방류능 검토

본 연구에서는 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분에 따른 하류하천 대안부의 유속분포 및 수위분포를 검토하기 위해 수치모의 Case 별 다음과 같이 관심구역을 설정하였다(Fig. 2 참조). 관심구역(대안부)의 길이(L)는 총 1.3 km로 10 m 등 간격으로 나누어 검토하였으며, Section 1(0 < X/L < 0.27)은 기존 여수로 방류에 따른 영향이 지배적인 구간, Section 2(0.27 < X/L < 1.00)는 보조 여수로 방류에 따른 영향이 지배적인 구간으로 각 구간에서의 수위, 유속, 수심결과를 확인하였다. 기존 여수로의 노후화에 따른 보조 여수로의 방류능 검토를 위하여 Case 1 – Case 6까지의 결과를 비교하였다.

보조 여수로의 단독 운영 시 기존 여수로 운영 시 보다 하류하천의 대안부의 최대 유속(Vmax)은 약 3% 감소하였으며, 이는 보조 여수로의 하천 유입각이 기존 여수로 보다 7°작으며 유입하천의 폭이 증가하여 유속이 감소한 것으로 판단된다. 대안부의 최대 유속 발생위치는 하류 쪽으로 이동하였으며 교량으로 인한 단면의 축소로 최대유속이 발생하는 것으로 판단된다. 또한 보조 여수로의 배분량(Qa)이 증가함에 따라 하류하천 대안부의 최대 유속이 증가하였다. 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시하고 있는 허용유속(Vp)과 비교한 결과, 계획홍수량(Qp)의 45% 이하(Case 5 & 6)를 보조 여수로에서 방류하게 되면 허용 유속(5.0 m/s)조건을 만족하여 호안안정성을 확보하였다(Fig. 3 참조). 허용유속 외에도 대안부에서의 소류력을 산정하여 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시한 허용 소류력(τp)과 비교한 결과, 유속과 동일하게 보조 여수로의 방류량이 계획홍수량의 45% 이하일 경우 허용소류력(0.28 kN/m2) 조건을 만족하였다(Fig. 4 참조). 각 Case 별 호안설계조건과 비교한 결과는 Table 5에 제시하였다.

하류하천의 수위도 기존 여수로 운영 시 보다 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 최대 수위(ηmax)가 약 2% 감소하는 효과를 보였으며 최대 수위 발생위치는 수충부로 여수로 방류시 처오름에 의한 수위 상승으로 판단된다. 기존 여수로의 단독운영(Case 1)의 수위(ηref)를 기준으로 보조 여수로의 방류량이 증가함에 따라 수위는 증가하였으나 계획홍수량의 58%까지 방류할 경우 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보되었다(Fig. 5 참조). 그러나 계획홍수량 조건에서는 월류에 대한 위험성이 존재하기 때문에 기존여수로와 보조여수로의 적절한 방류량 배분 조합을 도출하는 것이 중요하다고 판단되어 진다.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F2.jpg
Fig. 2

Region of interest in this study

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F3.jpg
Fig. 3

Maximum velocity and location of Vmax according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F4.jpg
Fig. 4

Maximum shear according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F5.jpg
Fig. 5

Maximum water surface elevation and location of ηmax according to Qa

Table 5.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 1 ~ Case 6)

CaseMaximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)		Maximum Shear
(τmax, kN/m2)		Evaluation
in terms of Vp		Evaluation
in terms of τp
1
(Qa = 0)		9.150.54No GoodNo Good
2
(Qa = Qp)		8.870.56No GoodNo Good
3
(Qa = 0.58Qp)		6.530.40No GoodNo Good
4
(Qa = 0.48Qp)		6.220.36No GoodNo Good
5
(Qa = 0.45Qp)		4.220.12AccpetAccpet
6
(Qa = 0.32Qp)		4.040.14AccpetAccpet

2.3.3 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류량 배분 검토

기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 단독운영에 따른 하류하천 및 호안의 안정성 평가를 수행한 결과 계획홍수량 방류 시 하류하천 대안부에서 호안 설계 조건(허용유속 및 허용 소류력)을 초과하였으며, 처오름에 의한 수위 상승으로 월류에 대한 위험성 증가를 확인하였다. 따라서 계획 홍수량 조건에서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분을 통하여 호안 안정성을 확보하고 하류하천에 방류로 인한 피해를 최소화할 수 있는 배분조합(Case 7 ~ Case 10)을 검토하였다. Case 7은 기존 여수로와 보조여수로의 배분 비율을 균등하게 적용한 경우이고, Case 8은 기존 여수로의 배분량이 보조 여수로에 비하여 많은 경우, Case 9는 보조 여수로의 배분량이 기존 여수로에 비하여 많은 경우를 의미한다. 최대유속을 비교한 결과 보조 여수로의 배분 비율이 큰 경우 기존 여수로의 배분량에 의하여 흐름이 하천 중심에 집중되어 대안부의 유속을 저감하는 효과를 확인하였다. 보조여수로의 방류량 배분 비율이 증가할수록 기존 여수로 대안부 측(0.00<X/L<0.27, Section 1) 유속 분포는 감소하였으나, 신규여수로 대안부 측(0.27<X/L<1.00, Section 2) 유속은 증가하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 6 참조). 그러나 유속 저감 효과에도 대안부 전구간에서 설계 허용유속 조건을 초과하여 제방의 안정성을 확보하지는 못하였다. 소류력 산정 결과 유속과 동일하게 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량 보다 크면 감소하는 것을 확인하였고 일부 구간에서는 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 7 참조).

따라서 유속 저감효과가 있는 배분 비율 조건(Qa>Qe)에서 Section 2에 유속 저감에 영향을 미치는 기존 여수로 방류량 배분 비율을 증가시켜 추가 검토(Case 10)를 수행하였다. 단독운영과 비교 시 하류하천에 유입되는 유량은 증가하였음에도 불구하고 기존 여수로 방류량에 의해 흐름이 하천 중심으로 집중되는 현상에 따라 대안부의 유속은 단독 운영에 비하여 감소하는 것을 확인하였고(Fig. 8 참조), 호안 설계 허용유속 및 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하는 구간이 발생하여 호안 안정성도 확보한 것으로 판단되었다. 최종적으로 각 Case 별 수위 결과의 경우 여수로 동시 운영을 수행하게 되면 대안부 전 구간에서 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보하였다(Fig. 9 참조). 각 Case 별 대안부에서 최대 유속결과 및 산정한 소류력은 Table 6에 제시하였다.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F6.jpg
Fig. 6

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F7.jpg
Fig. 7

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F8.jpg
Fig. 8

Velocity results of FLOW-3D (a: auxiliary spillway operation only , b : simultaneous operation of spillways)

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F9.jpg
Fig. 9

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

Table 6.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 7 ~ Case 10)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity (Vmax, m/s)Maximum Shear
(τmax, kN/m2)		Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of τp
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
7
Qe : 0.50QpQa : 0.50Qp		8.106.230.640.30No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
8
Qe : 0.61QpQa : 0.39Qp		8.886.410.610.34No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
9
Qe : 0.39QpQa : 0.61Qp		6.227.330.240.35No GoodNo GoodAcceptNo Good
10
Qe : 0.42QpQa : 0.58Qp		6.394.790.300.19No GoodAcceptNo GoodAccept

2.3.4 방류량 배분 비율의 허용 방류량 검토

계획 홍수량 방류 시 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 배분 비율 검토 결과 Case 10(Qe = 0.42Qp, Qa = 0.58Qp)에서 방류에 따른 하류 하천의 피해를 최소화시킬 수 있는 것을 확인하였다. 그러나 대안부 전 구간에 대하여 호안 설계조건을 만족하지 못하였다. 따라서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류 배분 비율을 고정시킨 후 총 방류량을 조절하여 허용 방류량을 검토하였다(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

호안 안정성 측면에서 검토한 결과 계획홍수량 대비 총 방류량이 감소하면 최대 유속 및 최대 소류력이 감소하고 최종적으로 계획 홍수량의 77%를 방류할 경우 하류하천의 대안부에서 호안 설계조건을 모두 만족하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 10, Fig. 11 참조). 각 Case 별 대안부에서 최대 유속결과 및 산정한 소류력은 Table 7에 제시하였다. 또한 Case 별 수위 검토 결과 처오름으로 인한 대안부 전 구간에서 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보하였다(Fig. 12 참조).

Table 7.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 11 ~ Case 14)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)		Maximum Shear
(τmax, kN/m2)		Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of τp
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
11
Qe : 0.32QpQa : 0.45Qp		3.634.530.090.26AcceptAcceptAcceptAccept
12
Qe : 0.35QpQa : 0.48Qp		5.745.180.230.22No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
13
Qe : 0.38QpQa : 0.53Qp		6.704.210.280.11No GoodAcceptAcceptAccept
14
Qe : 0.41QpQa : 0.56Qp		6.545.240.280.24No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F10.jpg
Fig. 10

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F11.jpg
Fig. 11

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F12.jpg
Fig. 12

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

3. 결 론

본 연구에서는 홍수 시 기존 여수로의 노후화로 인한 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대하여 하류하천의 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토하였다. 여수로 방류로 인한 하류하천의 흐름특성을 검토하기 위하여 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 활용하였고, 여수로 지형은 치수능력 증대사업을 통하여 완공된 ○○댐의 제원을 이용하였다. 하류하천 조도 계수 및 여수로 방류량은 하천기본계획을 참고하여 적용하였다. 최종적으로 여수로 방류로 인한 하류하천의 피해를 최소화 시킬 수 있는 적절한 보조 여수로의 활용방안을 도출하기 위하여 보조 여수로 단독 운영과 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영에 따른 하류 하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력의 변화를 검토하였다.

수문은 완전 개도 상태에서 방류한다는 가정으로 계획 홍수량 조건에서 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 하류하천 대안부의 유속 및 수위를 검토한 결과 기존 여수로 단독운영에 비하여 최대 유속 및 최대 수위가 감소하는 것을 확인할 수 있었으며, 이는 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 하류하천으로 유입각도가 작아지고, 유입되는 하천의 폭이 증가되기 때문이다. 그러나 계획 홍수량 조건에서 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시한 허용 유속(5.0 m/s)과 허용 소류력(0.28 kN/m2)과 비교하였을 때 호안 안정성을 확보하지 못하였으며, 계획홍수량의 45% 이하 방류 시에 대안부의 호안 안정성을 확보하였다. 수위의 경우 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서 처오름 현상이 발생하여 월류에 대한 위험성을 확인하였고 이를 통하여 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 방안을 도출하는 것이 중요하다고 판단된다. 따라서 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 측면에서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 배분 비율 및 총 방류량을 변화시켜가며 하류 하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력의 변화를 검토하였다. 배분 비율의 경우 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 균등 배분(Case 7) 및 편중 배분(Case 8 & Case 9)을 검토하여 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량보다 큰 경우 하류하천의 중심부로 집중되어 대안부의 최대유속, 최대소류력 및 최대수위가 감소하는 것을 확인하였다. 이를 근거로 기존 여수로의 방류 비율을 증가(Qe=0.42Qp, Qa=0.58Qp)시켜 검토한 결과 대안부 일부 구간에서 허용 유속 및 허용소류력 조건을 만족하는 것을 확인하였다. 이를 통하여 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 동시 운영을 통하여 적절한 방류량 배분 비율을 도출하는 것이 방류로 인한 하류하천의 피해를 저감하는데 효과적인 것으로 판단된다. 그러나 설계홍수량 방류 시 전 구간에서 허용 유속 및 소류력 조건을 만족하지 못하였다. 최종적으로 전체 방류량에서 기존 여수로의 방류 비율을 42%, 보조 여수로의 방류 비율을 58%로 설정하여 허용방류량을 검토한 결과, 계획홍수량의 77%이하로 방류 시 대안부의 최대유속은 기존여수로 방류의 지배영향구간(section 1)에서 3.63 m/s, 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류의 영향구간(section 2)에서 4.53 m/s로 허용유속 조건을 만족하였고, 산정한 소류력도 각각 0.09 kN/m2 및 0.26 kN/m2로 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하여 대안부 호안의 안정성을 확보하였다고 판단된다.

본 연구 결과는 기후변화 및 기존여수로의 노후화로 인하여 홍수 시 기존여수로의 단독운영으로 하류하천의 피해가 발생할 수 있는 현시점에서 치수증대 사업으로 완공된 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있고, 향후 계획 홍수량 유입 시 최적의 배분 비율 및 허용 방류량 도출에 이용할 수 있다. 다만 본 연구는 여수로 방류에 따른 제방에 작용하는 수충력은 검토하지 못하고, 허용 유속 및 허용소류력은 제방과 유수의 방향이 일정한 구간에 대하여 검토하였다. 또한 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서의 영향에 대해서만 검토하였고 수문 전면 개도 조건에서 검토하였다는 한계점은 분명히 있다. 이에 향후에는 다양한 수문 개도 조건 및 방류 시나리오를 적용 및 검토하여 보다 효율적이고, 효과적인 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출하고자 한다.

Acknowledgements

본 결과물은 K-water에서 수행한 기존 및 신규 여수로 효율적 연계운영 방안 마련(2021-WR-GP-76-149)의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다.

References

1 Busan Construction and Management Administration (2009). Nakdonggang River Master Plan. Busan: BCMA.

2 Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill. New York.

3 Flow Science (2011). Flow3D User Manual. Santa Fe: NM.

4 Jeon, T. M., Kim, H. I., Park, H. S., and Baek, U. I. (2006). Design of Emergency Spillway Using Hydraulic and Numerical Model-ImHa Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1726-1731.

5 Kim, D. G., Park, S. J., Lee, Y. S., and Hwang, J. H. (2008). Spillway Design by Using Numerical Model Experiment – Case Study of AnDong Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1604-1608.

6 Kim, J. S. (2007). Comparison of Hydraulic Experiment and Numerical Model on Spillway. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.

7 Kim, S. H. and Kim, J. S. (2013). Effect of Chungju Dam Operation for Flood Control in the Upper Han River. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537

8 K-water (2021). Regulations of Dam Management. Daejeon: K-water.

9 K-water and MOLIT (2004). Report on the Establishment of Basic Plan for the Increasing Flood Capacity and Review of Hydrological Stability of Dams. Sejong: K-water and MOLIT.

10 Lee, J. H., Julien, P. Y., and Thornton, C. I. (2019). Interference of Dual Spillways Operations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 145(5): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001593

11 Li, S., Cain, S., Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H., and Wyckoff, R. (2011). Numerical Modeling of Probable Maximum Flood Flowing through a System of Spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 137(1): 66-74. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000279

12 MOLIT (2016). Practice Guidelines of River Construction Design. Sejong: MOLIT.

13 MOLIT (2019). Standards of River Design. Sejong: MOLIT.

14 Prime Minister’s Secretariat (2003). White Book on Flood Damage Prevention Measures. Sejong: PMS.

15 Schoklitsch, A. (1934). Der Geschiebetrieb und Die Geschiebefracht. Wasserkraft Wasserwirtschaft. 4: 1-7.

16 Vanoni, V. A. (Ed.). (2006). Sedimentation Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers. Virginia: ASCE. 10.1061/9780784408230

17 Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Ansar, M., Damisse, E., and González-Castro, J. A. (2017). Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Flow Ratings at Prototype Spillways and Weirs. I: Data Generation and Validation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 143(1): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001112

Korean References Translated from the English

1 건설교통부·한국수자원공사 (2004). 댐의 수문학적 안정성 검토 및 치수능력증대방안 기본계획 수립 보고서. 세종: 국토교통부.

2 국무총리실 수해방지대책단 (2003). 수해방지대책 백서. 세종: 국무총리실.

3 국토교통부 (2016). 하천공사 설계실무요령. 세종: 국토교통부.

4 국토교통부 (2019). 하천설계기준해설. 세종: 국토교통부.

5 김대근, 박선중, 이영식, 황종훈 (2008). 수치모형실험을 이용한 여수로 설계 – 안동다목적댐. 한국수자원학회 학술발표회. 1604-1608.

6 김상호, 김지성 (2013). 충주댐 방류에 따른 댐 상하류 홍수위 영향 분석. 대한토목학회논문집. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537

7 김주성 (2007). 댐 여수로부 수리 및 수치모형실험 비교 고찰. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.

8 부산국토관리청 (2009). 낙동강수계 하천기본계획(변경). 부산: 부산국토관리청.

9 전태명, 김형일, 박형섭, 백운일 (2006). 수리모형실험과 수치모의를 이용한 비상여수로 설계-임하댐. 한국수자원학회 학술발표회. 1726-1731.

10 한국수자원공사 (2021). 댐관리 규정. 대전: 한국수자원공사.

원문보기
Figure 16: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Ghulmet

댐 붕괴 홍수파 및 범람 매핑 시뮬레이션: A
아타바드 호수 사례 연구

Simulation of Dam-Break Flood Wave and Inundation Mapping: A
Case study of Attabad Lake

Wasim Karam1, Fayaz A. Khan2, Muhammad Alam3, Sajjad Ali4
1Lab. Engineer, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Pakistan,
wasim10karam@gmail.com
2Assistant Professor, National Institute of Urban Infrastructure Planning, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar,
Pakistan, fayazuet@yahoo.com
3,4Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Mardan, Pakistan,
emalam82@gmail.com, sajjadali@uetmardan.edu.pk

ABSTRACT

산사태 또는 제방 댐의 파손 연구는 구성이 불확실하고 자연적이며 재해에 대해 적절하게 설계되지 않았기 때문에 다른 자연적 사건에 대한 대응 지식이 부족하기 때문에 더 중요합니다. 이 논문은 댐 ​​파괴의 수력학적 모델링의 다양한 방법을 개선하는 것을 목표로 합니다.

현재 이 연구에서 Attabad 호수의 댐 붕괴는 전산 유체 역학 기술을 사용하여 시뮬레이션됩니다. 수치 모델(FLOW-3D)은 Reynolds 평균 Navier-Stoke 방정식을 완전히 3D로 풀어서 다양한 단면에서의 피크 유량 깊이, 피크 속도, 피크 방전, 피크 깊이까지의 시간 및 피크 방전까지의 시간을 예측하기 위해 개발되었습니다.

표준 RNG 난류 모델을 사용하여 난류를 시뮬레이션한 다음 마을의 흐름에 대한 홍수 범람 지도와 속도 벡터를 그립니다. 결과는 Hunza 강의 수로를 통해 모델링된 홍수파의 대부분이 Hunza 강의 범람원에 포함되지만 Hunza 강의 범람원 내부에 위치한 Miaun 및 chalat와 같은 일부 마을의 경우 더 높은 위험에 있음을 보여줍니다.

그러나 이들 마을의 예상 홍수 도달 시간은 각각 31분과 44분으로 인구를 안전한 지역으로 대피시키기에 충분한 시간인 반면, 알리 아바드에 인접한 하산 아바드와 같은 일부 마을의 경우 침수 위험이 더 높은 반면 마을의 예상 홍수 도착 시간은 12분으로 인구 대피에 충분하지 않으므로 홍수 억제를 위한 추가 홍수 보호 구조가 필요합니다.

최고속도의 추정치는 하천평야의 더 높은 전단응력, 심한 침식의 위험, 농경지 피해, 주거지 및 형태학적 변화가 예상됨을 의미한다. 댐 파손 분석(예: 최고 깊이, 최고 속도, 홍수 도달 시간 및 홍수 범람 지도)은 향후 위험 분석 및 홍수 관리의 지침으로만 사용해야 합니다.

Figure 2: Case Study Location on Map of Pakistan
Figure 2: Case Study Location on Map of Pakistan
Figure 3: Lake Condition 3 months after Landslide
Figure 3: Lake Condition 3 months after Landslide
Figure 5: 3D Model from the Merged DEM
Figure 5: 3D Model from the Merged DEM
Figure 7: Free Surface Elevation relative to local origin
Figure 7: Free Surface Elevation relative to local origin
Figure 8: Model of lake referenced over Google Earth Image
Figure 8: Model of lake referenced over Google Earth Image
Figure 9: Meshing in the 3D Terrain Model
Figure 9: Meshing in the 3D Terrain Model
Figure 10: Flow Depth Hydrographs of the downstream villages (A) Karim Abad (B) Ghulmet (C) Thol (D) Chalat (E) Nomal
Figure 10: Flow Depth Hydrographs of the downstream villages (A) Karim Abad (B) Ghulmet (C) Thol (D) Chalat (E) Nomal
Figure 11: Flow Hydrograph at Karim Abad and Nomal Bridge
Figure 11: Flow Hydrograph at Karim Abad and Nomal Bridge
Figure 12: Flood Inundation Map of Karim Abad
Figure 12: Flood Inundation Map of Karim Abad
Figure 13: Flood Inundation Map of Ghulmet
Figure 13: Flood Inundation Map of Ghulmet
Figure 14: Flood Inundation Map of Chalat
Figure 14: Flood Inundation Map of Chalat
Figure 15: Velocity Vectors of flow at Karim Abad
Figure 15: Velocity Vectors of flow at Karim Abad
Figure 16: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Ghulmet
Figure 16: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Ghulmet
Figure 17: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Chalat
Figure 17: Velocity Vectors of Flow at Chalat

REFERENCES

[1]. Zhang, L. & Peng, M. & Chang, D.S. & Xu, Y. (2015).
Dam Failure Mechanisms and Risk Assessment, First
Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Singapore 473 pp.
10.1002/9781118558522.
[2]. T. L. Wahl, “Dam Breach Modeling – an Overview of
Analysis Methods,” 2nd Jt. Fed. Interagency Conf. Las
Vegas, NV, pp. 1–12, 2010.
[3]. Khosravi K. “Dam Break Analysis and Flood
Inundation Mapping : The Case Study of Sefid-Rud
Dam,” no. August 2019. DOI:
10.1016/B978-0-12-815998-9.00031-2
[4]. Robb, D. M., & Vasquez, J. A. (2015). Numerical
simulation of dam-break flows using depth-averaged
hydrodynamic and three-dimensional CFD models.
22nd Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference, (June).
[5]. Mohammad Rostami, M. S. (2015). Human Life Saving
by Simulation of Dam Break using Flow-3D. Trend in
Life Sciences, 4(3), 308–316
[6]. Gharbi, M., Soualmia, A., Dartus, D., & Masbernat, L.
(2016). Comparison of 1D and 2D hydraulic models
for floods simulation on the Medjerda River in
Tunisia. Journal of Materials and Environmental
Science, 7(8), 3017–3026. https://doi.org/10.1080/153
[7]. Andrei, A., Robert, B., & Erika, B. (2017). Numerical
Limitations of 1D Hydraulic Models Using MIKE11
or HEC-RAS software – A case study of Baraolt
River, Romania. IOP Conference Series: Materials
Science and Engineering, 245(7).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/7/072010
[8]. Henderson, F.M. (1966). Open Channel Flow. MacMillan
Company, New York, USA, P. No 304-313
[9]. Betsholtz, A., & Nordlöf, B. (2017). Potentials and
limitations of 1D, 2D and coupled 1D-2D flood
modeling in HEC-RAS. Lund University, 128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9440(03)00139-5
[10].Ozmen-Cagatay, H., & Kocaman, S. (2011). Dam-break
flow in the presence of obstacle: Experiment and CFD
simulation. Engineering Applications of Computational
Fluid Mechanics, 5(4), 541–552.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2011.11015393
[11].Toombes, L., & Chanson, H. (2011). Numerical
Limitations of Hydraulic Models. 10th Hydraulics
Conference, (July), 2322–2329.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1613
[12].Zarein, M. (2015). Modeling Dam-Break Flows Using
a 3d Mike 3 Flow Model, (January).
[13].George, A. C., & Nair, B. T. (2015). Dam Break
Analysis Using BOSS DAMBRK. Aquatic Procedia,
4(Icwrcoe), 853–860.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.10
[14].S. Roga and K. M. Pandey, “Computational Analysis of
Supersonic Flow Regime Using Ramp Injector with
Standard K- ω Turbulence Model” .World Academy of
research in Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp.
31–40, 2013.http:// doi.org/10.1.1.348.5862.

원문 PDF 보기
Fig. 5. The predicted shapes of initial breach (a) Rectangular (b) V-notch. Fig. 6. Dam breaching stages.

Investigating the peak outflow through a spatial embankment dam breach

공간적 제방댐 붕괴를 통한 최대 유출량 조사

Mahmoud T.GhonimMagdy H.MowafyMohamed N.SalemAshrafJatwaryFaculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt

Abstract

Investigating the breach outflow hydrograph is an essential task to conduct mitigation plans and flood warnings. In the present study, the spatial dam breach is simulated by using a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model, FLOW-3D. The model parameters were adjusted by making a comparison with a previous experimental model. The different parameters (initial breach shape, dimensions, location, and dam slopes) are studied to investigate their effects on dam breaching. The results indicate that these parameters have a significant impact. The maximum erosion rate and peak outflow for the rectangular shape are higher than those for the V-notch by 8.85% and 5%, respectively. Increasing breach width or decreasing depth by 5% leads to increasing maximum erosion rate by 11% and 15%, respectively. Increasing the downstream slope angle by 4° leads to an increase in both peak outflow and maximum erosion rate by 2.0% and 6.0%, respectively.

유출 유출 수문곡선을 조사하는 것은 완화 계획 및 홍수 경보를 수행하는 데 필수적인 작업입니다. 본 연구에서는 3차원 전산유체역학 모델인 FLOW-3D를 사용하여 공간 댐 붕괴를 시뮬레이션합니다. 이전 실험 모델과 비교하여 모델 매개변수를 조정했습니다.

다양한 매개변수(초기 붕괴 형태, 치수, 위치 및 댐 경사)가 댐 붕괴에 미치는 영향을 조사하기 위해 연구됩니다. 결과는 이러한 매개변수가 상당한 영향을 미친다는 것을 나타냅니다. 직사각형 형태의 최대 침식율과 최대 유출량은 V-notch보다 각각 8.85%, 5% 높게 나타났습니다.

위반 폭을 늘리거나 깊이를 5% 줄이면 최대 침식률이 각각 11% 및 15% 증가합니다. 하류 경사각을 4° 증가시키면 최대 유출량과 최대 침식률이 각각 2.0% 및 6.0% 증가합니다.

Keywords

Spatial dam breach; FLOW-3D; Overtopping erosion; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

1. Introduction

There are many purposes for dam construction, such as protection from flood disasters, water storage, and power generation. Embankment failures may have a catastrophic impact on lives and infrastructure in the downstream regions. One of the most common causes of embankment dam failure is overtopping. Once the overtopping of the dam begins, the breach formation will start in the dam body then end with the dam failure. This failure occurs within a very short time, which threatens to be very dangerous. Therefore, understanding and modeling the embankment breaching processes is essential for conducting mitigation plans, flood warnings, and forecasting flood damage.

The analysis of the dam breaching process is implemented by different techniques: comparative methods, empirical models with dimensional and dimensionless solutions, physical-based models, and parametric models. These models were described in detail [1]. Parametric modeling is commonly used to simulate breach growth as a time-dependent linear process and calculate outflow discharge from the breach using hydraulics principles [2]. Alhasan et al. [3] presented a simple one-dimensional mathematical model and a computer code to simulate the dam breaching process. These models were validated by small dams breaching during the floods in 2002 in the Czech Republic. Fread [4] developed an erosion model (BREACH) based on hydraulics principles, sediment transport, and soil mechanics to estimate breach size, time of formation, and outflow discharge. Říha et al. [5] investigated the dam break process for a cascade of small dams using a simple parametric model for piping and overtopping erosion, as well as a 2D shallow-water flow model for the flood in downstream areas. Goodarzi et al. [6] implemented mathematical and statistical methods to assess the effect of inflows and wind speeds on the dam’s overtopping failure.

Dam breaching studies can be divided into two main modes of erosion. The first mode is called “planar dam breach” where the flow overtops the whole dam width. While the second mode is called “spatial dam breach” where the flow overtops through the initial pilot channel (i.e., a channel created in the dam body). Therefore, the erosion will be in both vertical and horizontal directions [7].

The erosion process through the embankment dams occurs due to the shear stress applied by water flows. The dam breaching evolution can be divided into three stages [8], [9], but Y. Yang et al. [10] divided the breach development into five stages: Stage I, the seepage erosion; Stage II, the initial breach formation; Stage III, the head erosion; Stage IV, the breach expansion; and Stage V, the re-equilibrium of the river channel through the breach. Many experimental tests have been carried out on non-cohesive embankment dams with an initial breach to examine the effect of upstream inflow discharges on the longitudinal profile evolution and the time to inflection point [11].

Zhang et al. [12] studied the effect of changing downstream slope angle, sediment grain size, and dam crest length on erosion rates. They noticed that increasing dam crest length and decreasing downstream slope angle lead to decreasing sediment transport rate. While the increase in sediment grain size leads to an increased sediment transport rate at the initial stages. Höeg et al. [13] presented a series of field tests to investigate the stability of embankment dams made of various materials. Overtopping and piping were among the failure tests carried out for the dams composed of homogeneous rock-fill, clay, or gravel with a height of up to 6.0 m. Hakimzadeh et al. [14] constructed 40 homogeneous cohesive and non-cohesive embankment dams to study the effect of changing sediment diameter and dam height on the breaching process. They also used genetic programming (GP) to estimate the breach outflow. Refaiy et al. [15] studied different scenarios for the downstream drain geometry, such as length, height, and angle, to minimize the effect of piping phenomena and therefore increase dam safety.

Zhu et al. [16] examined the effect of headcut erosion on dam breach growth, especially in the case of cohesive dams. They found that the breach growth in non-cohesive embankments is slower than cohesive embankments due to the little effect of headcut. Schmocker and Hager [7] proposed a relationship for estimating peak outflow from the dam breach process.(1)QpQin-1=1.7exp-20hc23d5013H0

where: Qp = peak outflow discharge.

Qin = inflow discharge.

hc = critical flow depth.

d50 = mean sediment diameter.

Ho = initial dam height.

Yu et al. [17] carried out an experimental study for homogeneous non-cohesive embankment dams in a 180° bending rectangular flume to determine the effect of overtopping flows on breaching formation. They found that the main factors influencing breach formation are water level, river discharge, and embankment material diameter.

Wu et al. [18] carried out a series of experiments to investigate the effect of breaching geometry on both non-cohesive and cohesive embankment dams in a U-bend flume due to overtopping flows. In the case of non-cohesive embankments, the non-symmetrical lateral expansion was noticed during the breach formation. This expansion was described by a coefficient ranging from 2.7 to 3.3.

The numerical models of the dam breach can be categorized according to different parameters, such as flow dimensions (1D, 2D, or 3D), flow governing equations, and solution methods. The 1D models are mainly used to predict the outflow hydrograph from the dam breach. Saberi et al. [19] applied the 1D Saint-Venant equation, which is solved by the finite difference method to investigate the outflow hydrograph during dam overtopping failure. Because of the ability to study dam profile evolution and breach formation, 2D models are more applicable than 1D models. Guan et al. [20] and Wu et al. [21] employed both 2D shallow water equations (SWEs) and sediment erosion equations, which are solved by the finite volume method to study the effect of the dam’s geometry parameters on outflow hydrograph and dam profile evolution. Wang et al. [22] also proposed a second-order hybrid-type of total variation diminishing (TVD) finite-difference to estimate the breach outflow by solving the 2D (SWEs). The accuracy of (SWEs) for both vertical flow contraction and surface roughness has been assessed [23]. They noted that the accuracy of (SWEs) is acceptable for milder slopes, but in the case of steeper slopes, modelers should be more careful. Generally, the accuracy of 2D models is still low, especially with velocity distribution over the flow depth, lateral momentum exchange, density-driven flows, and bottom friction [24]. Therefore, 3D models are preferred. Larocque et al. [25] and Yang et al. [26] started to use three-dimensional (3D) models that depend on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations.

Previous experimental studies concluded that there is no clear relationship between the peak outflow from the dam breach and the initial breach characteristics. Some of these studies depend on the sharp-crested weir fixed at the end of the flume to determine the peak outflow from the breach, which leads to a decrease in the accuracy of outflow calculations at the microscale. The main goals of this study are to carry out a numerical simulation for a spatial dam breach due to overtopping flows by using (FLOW-3D) software to find an empirical equation for the peak outflow discharge from the breach and determine the worst-case that leads to accelerating the dam breaching process.

2. Numerical simulation

The current study for spatial dam breach is simulated by using (FLOW-3D) software [27], which is a powerful computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program.

2.1. Geometric presentations

A stereolithographic (STL) file is prepared for each change in the initial breach geometry and dimensions. The CAD program is useful for creating solid objects and converting them to STL format, as shown in Fig. 1.

2.2. Governing equations

The governing equations for water flow are three-dimensional Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS).

The continuity equation:(2)∂ui∂xi=0

The momentum equation:(3)∂ui∂t+1VFuj∂ui∂xj=1ρ∂∂xj-pδij+ν∂ui∂xj+∂uj∂xi-ρu`iu`j¯

where u is time-averaged velocity,ν is kinematic viscosity, VF is fractional volume open to flow, p is averaged pressure and -u`iu`j¯ are components of Reynold’s stress. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) technique is used to simulate the free surface profile. Hirt et al. [28] presented the VOF algorithm, which employs the function (F) to express the occupancy of each grid cell with fluid. The value of (F) varies from zero to unity. Zero value refers to no fluid in the grid cell, while the unity value refers to the grid cell being fully occupied with fluid. The free surface is formed in the grid cells having (F) values between zero and unity.(4)∂F∂t+1VF∂∂xFAxu+∂∂yFAyv+∂∂zFAzw=0

where (u, v, w) are the velocity components in (x, y, z) coordinates, respectively, and (Ax, Ay, Az) are the area fractions.

2.3. Boundary and initial conditions

To improve the accuracy of the results, the boundary conditions should be carefully determined. In this study, two mesh blocks are used to minimize the time consumed in the simulation. The boundary conditions for mesh block 1 are as follows: The inlet and sides boundaries are defined as a wall boundary condition (wall boundary condition is usually used for bound fluid by solid regions. In the case of viscous flows, no-slip means that the tangential velocity is equal to the wall velocity and the normal velocity is zero), the outlet is defined as a symmetry boundary condition (symmetry boundary condition is usually used to reduce computational effort during CFD simulation. This condition allows the flow to be transferred from one mesh block to another. No inputs are required for this boundary condition except that its location should be defined accurately), the bottom boundary is defined as a uniform flow rate boundary condition, and the top boundary is defined as a specific pressure boundary condition with assigned atmospheric pressure. The boundary conditions for mesh block 2 are as follows: The inlet is defined as a symmetry boundary condition, the outlet is defined as a free flow boundary condition, the bottom and sides boundaries are defined as a wall boundary condition, and the top boundary is defined as a specific pressure boundary condition with assigned atmospheric pressure as shown in Fig. 2. The initial conditions required to be set for the fluid (i.e., water) inside of the domain include configuration, temperature, velocities, and pressure distribution. The configuration of water depends on the dimensions and shape of the dam reservoir. While the other conditions have been assigned as follows: temperature is normal water temperature (25 °c) and pressure distribution is hydrostatic with no initial velocity.

2.4. Numerical method

FLOW-3D uses the finite volume method (FVM) to solve the governing equation (Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) over the computational domain. A finite-volume method is an Eulerian approach for representing and evaluating partial differential equations in algebraic equations form [29]. At discrete points on the mesh geometry, values are determined. Finite volume expresses a small volume surrounding each node point on a mesh. In this method, the divergence theorem is used to convert volume integrals with a divergence term to surface integrals. After that, these terms are evaluated as fluxes at each finite volume’s surfaces.

2.5. Turbulent models

Turbulence is the chaotic, unstable motion of fluids that occurs when there are insufficient stabilizing viscous forces. In FLOW-3D, there are six turbulence models available: the Prandtl mixing length model, the one-equation turbulent energy model, the two-equation (k – ε) model, the Renormalization-Group (RNG) model, the two-equation (k – ω) models, and a large eddy simulation (LES) model. For simulating flow motion, the RNG model is adopted to simulate the motion behavior better than the k – ε and k – ω.

models [30]. The RNG model consists of two main equations for the turbulent kinetic energy KT and its dissipation.εT(5)∂kT∂t+1VFuAx∂kT∂x+vAy∂kT∂y+wAz∂kT∂z=PT+GT+DiffKT-εT(6)∂εT∂t+1VFuAx∂εT∂x+vAy∂εT∂y+wAz∂εT∂z=C1.εTKTPT+c3.GT+Diffε-c2εT2kT

where KT is the turbulent kinetic energy, PT is the turbulent kinetic energy production, GT is the buoyancy turbulence energy, εT is the turbulent energy dissipation rate, DiffKT and Diffε are terms of diffusion, c1, c2 and c3 are dimensionless parameters, in which c1 and c3 have a constant value of 1.42 and 0.2, respectively, c2 is computed from the turbulent kinetic energy (KT) and turbulent production (PT) terms.

2.6. Sediment scour model

The sediment scour model available in FLOW-3D can calculate all the sediment transport processes including Entrainment transport, Bedload transport, Suspended transport, and Deposition. The erosion process starts once the water flows remove the grains from the packed bed and carry them into suspension. It happens when the applied shear stress by water flows exceeds critical shear stress. This process is represented by entrainment transport in the numerical model. After entrained, the grains carried by water flow are represented by suspended load transport. After that, some suspended grains resort to settling because of the combined effect of gravity, buoyancy, and friction. This process is described through a deposition. Finally, the grains sliding motions are represented by bedload transport in the model. For the entrainment process, the shear stress applied by the fluid motion on the packed bed surface is calculated using the standard wall function as shown in Eq.7.(7)ks,i=Cs,i∗d50

where ks,i is the Nikuradse roughness and Cs,i is a user-defined coefficient. The critical bed shear stress is defined by a dimensionless parameter called the critical shields number as expressed in Eq.8.(8)θcr,i=τcr,i‖g‖diρi-ρf

where θcr,i is the critical shields number, τcr,i is the critical bed shear stress, g is the absolute value of gravity acceleration, di is the diameter of the sediment grain, ρi is the density of the sediment species (i) and ρf is the density of the fluid. The value of the critical shields number is determined according to the Soulsby-Whitehouse equation.(9)θcr,i=0.31+1.2d∗,i+0.0551-exp-0.02d∗,i

where d∗,i is the dimensionless diameter of the sediment, given by Eq.10.(10)d∗,i=diρfρi-ρf‖g‖μf213

where μf is the fluid dynamic viscosity. For the sloping bed interface, the value of the critical shields number is modified according to Eq.11.(11)θ`cr,i=θcr,icosψsinβ+cos2βtan2φi-sin2ψsin2βtanφi

where θ`cr,i is the modified critical shields number, φi is the angle of repose for the sediment, β is the angle of bed slope and ψ is the angle between the flow and the upslope direction. The effects of the rolling, hopping, and sliding motions of grains along the packed bed surface are taken by the bedload transport process. The volumetric bedload transport rate (qb,i) per width of the bed is expressed in Eq.12.(12)qb,i=Φi‖g‖ρi-ρfρfdi312

where Φi is the dimensionless bedload transport rate is calculated by using Meyer Peter and Müller equation.(13)Φi=βMPM,iθi-θ`cr,i1.5cb,i

where βMPM,i is the Meyer Peter and Müller user-defined coefficient and cb,i is the volume fraction of species i in the bed material. The suspended load transport is calculated as shown in Eq.14.(14)∂Cs,i∂t+∇∙Cs,ius,i=∇∙∇DCs,i

where Cs,i is the suspended sediment mass concentration, D is the diffusivity, and us,i is the grain velocity of species i. Entrainment and deposition are two opposing processes that take place at the same time. The lifting and settling velocities for both entrainment and deposition processes are calculated according to Eq.15 and Eq.16, respectively.(15)ulifting,i=αid∗,i0.3θi-θ`cr,igdiρiρf-1(16)usettling,i=υfdi10.362+1.049d∗,i3-10.36

where αi is the entrainment coefficient of species i and υf is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid.

2.7. Grid type

Using simple rectangular orthogonal elements in planes and hexahedral in volumes in the (FLOW-3D) program makes the mesh generation process easier, decreases the required memory, and improves numerical accuracy. Two mesh blocks were used in a joined form with a size ratio of 2:1. The first mesh block is coarser, which contains the reservoir water, and the second mesh block is finer, which contains the dam. For achieving accuracy and efficiency in results, the mesh size is determined by using a grid convergence test. The optimum uniform cell size for the first mesh block is 0.012 m and for the second mesh block is 0.006 m.

2.8. Time step

The maximum time step size is determined by using a Courant number, which controls the distance that the flow will travel during the simulation time step. In this study, the Courant number was taken equal to 0.25 to prevent the flow from traveling through more than one cell in the time step. Based on the Courant number, a maximum time step value of 0.00075 s was determined.

2.9. Numerical model validation

The numerical model accuracy was achieved by comparing the numerical model results with previous experimental results. The experimental study of Schmocker and Hager [7] was based on 31 tests with changes in six parameters (d50, Ho, Bo, Lk, XD, and Qin). All experimental tests were conducted in a straight open glass-sided flume. The horizontal flume has a rectangular cross-section with a width of 0.4 m and a height of 0.7 m. The flume was provided with a flow straightener and an intake with a length of 0.66 m. All tested dams were inserted at various distances (XD) from the intake. Test No.1 from this experimental program was chosen to validate the numerical model. The different parameters used in test No.1 are as follows:

(1) uniform sediment with a mean diameter (d50 = 0.31 mm), (2) Ho = 0.2 m, (3) Bo = 0.2 m, (4) Lk = 0.1 m,

(5) XD = 1.0 m, (6) Qin = 6.0 lit/s, (7) Su and Sd = 2:1, (8) mass density (ρs = 2650 kg/m3) (9) Homogenous and non-cohesive embankment dam. As shown in Fig. 2, the simulation is contained within a rectangular grid with dimensions: 3.56 m in the x-direction (where 0.66 m is used as inlet, 0.9 m as dam base width, and 1.0 m as outlet), in y-direction 0.2 m (dam length), and in the z-direction 0.3 m, which represents the dam height (0.2 m) with a free distance (0.1 m) above the dam. There are two main reasons that this experimental program is preferred for the validation process. The first reason is that this program deals with homogenous, non-cohesive soil, which is available in FLOW-3D. The second reason is that this program deals with small-scale models which saves time for numerical simulation. Finally, some important assumptions were considered during the validation process. The flow is assumed to be incompressible, viscous, turbulent, and three-dimensional.

By comparing dam profiles at different time instants for the experimental test with the current numerical model, it appears that the numerical model gives good agreement as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, with an average error percentage of 9% between the experimental results and the numerical model.

3. Analysis and discussions

The current model is used to study the effects of different parameters such as (initial breach shapes, dimensions, locations, upstream and downstream dam slopes) on the peak outflow discharge, QP, time of peak outflow, tP, and rate of erosion, E.

This study consists of a group of scenarios. The first scenario is changing the shapes of the initial breach according to Singh [1], the most predicted shapes are rectangular and V-notch as shown in Fig. 5. The second scenario is changing the initial breach dimensions (i.e., width and depth). While the third scenario is changing the location of the initial breach. Eventually, the last scenario is changing the upstream and downstream dam slopes.

All scenarios of this study were carried out under the same conditions such as inflow discharge value (Qin=1.0lit/s), dimensions of the tested dam, where dam height (Ho=0.20m), crest width.

(Lk=0.1m), dam length (Bo=0.20m), and homogenous & non-cohesive soil with a mean diameter (d50=0.31mm).

3.1. Dam breaching process evolution

The dam breaching process is a very complex process due to the quick changes in hydrodynamic conditions during dam failure. The dam breaching process starts once water flows reach the downstream face of the dam. During the initial stage of dam breaching, the erosion process is relatively quiet due to low velocities of flow. As water flows continuously, erosion rates increase, especially in two main zones: the crest and the downstream face. As soon as the dam crest is totally eroded, the water levels in the dam reservoir decrease rapidly, accompanied by excessive erosion in the dam body. The erosion process continues until the water levels in the dam reservoir equal the remaining height of the dam.

According to Zhou et al. [11], the breaching process consists of three main stages. The first stage starts with beginning overtopping flow, then ends when the erosion point directed upstream and reached the inflection point at the inflection time (ti). The second stage starts from the end of the stage1 until the occurrence of peak outflow discharge at the peak outflow time (tP). The third stage starts from the end of the stage2 until the value of outflow discharge becomes the same as the value of inflow discharge at the final time (tf). The outflow discharge from the dam breach increases rapidly during stage1 and stage2 because of the large dam storage capacity (i.e., the dam reservoir is totally full of water) and excessive erosion. While at stage3, the outflow values start to decrease slowly because most of the dam’s storage capacity was run out. The end of stage3 indicates that the dam storage capacity was totally run out, so the outflow equalized with the inflow discharge as shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.

3.2. The effect of initial breach shape

To identify the effect of the initial breach shape on the evolution of the dam breaching process. Three tests were carried out with different cross-section areas for each shape. The initial breach is created at the center of the dam crest. Each test had an ID to make the process of arranging data easier. The rectangular shape had an ID (Rec5h & 5b), which means that its depth and width are equal to 5% of the dam height, and the V-notch shape had an ID (V-noch5h & 1:1) which means that its depth is equal to 5% of the dam height and its side slope is equal to 1:1. The comparison between rectangular and V-notch shapes is done by calculating the ratio between maximum dam height at different times (ZMax) to the initial dam height (Ho), rate of erosion, and hydrograph of outflow discharge for each test. The rectangular shape achieves maximum erosion rate and minimum inflection time, in addition to a rapid decrease in the dam reservoir levels. Therefore, the dam breaching is faster in the case of a rectangular shape than in a V-notch shape, which has the same cross-section area as shown in Fig. 8.

Also, by comparing the hydrograph for each test, the peak outflow discharge value in the case of a rectangular shape is higher than the V-notch shape by 5% and the time of peak outflow for the rectangular shape is shorter than the V-notch shape by 9% as shown in Fig. 9.

3.3. The effect of initial breach dimensions

The results of the comparison between the different initial breach shapes indicate that the worst initial breach shape is rectangular, so the second scenario from this study concentrated on studying the effect of a change in the initial rectangular breach dimensions. Groups of tests were carried out with different depths and widths for the rectangular initial breach. The first group had a depth of 5% from the dam height and with three different widths of 5,10, and 15% from the dam height, the second group had a depth of 10% with three different widths of 5,10, and 15%, the third group had a depth of 15% with three different widths of 5,10, and 15% and the final group had a width of 15% with three different heights of 5, 10, and 15% for a rectangular breach shape. The comparison was made as in the previous section to determine the worst case that leads to the quick dam failure as shown in Fig. 10.

The results show that the (Rec 5 h&15b) test achieves a maximum erosion rate for a shorter period of time and a minimum ratio for (Zmax / Ho) as shown in Fig. 10, which leads to accelerating the dam failure process. The dam breaching process is faster with the minimum initial breach depth and maximum initial breach width. In the case of a minimum initial breach depth, the retained head of water in the dam reservoir is high and the crest width at the bottom of the initial breach (L`K) is small, so the erosion point reaches the inflection point rapidly. While in the case of the maximum initial breach width, the erosion perimeter is large.

3.4. The effect of initial breach location

The results of the comparison between the different initial rectangular breach dimensions indicate that the worst initial breach dimension is (Rec 5 h&15b), so the third scenario from this study concentrated on studying the effect of a change in the initial breach location. Three locations were checked to determine the worst case for the dam failure process. The first location is at the center of the dam crest, which was named “Center”, the second location is at mid-distance between the dam center and dam edge, which was named “Mid”, and the third location is at the dam edge, which was named “Edge” as shown in Fig. 11. According to this scenario, the results indicate that the time of peak outflow discharge (tP) is the same in the three cases, but the maximum value of the peak outflow discharge occurs at the center location. The difference in the peak outflow values between the three cases is relatively small as shown in Fig. 12.

The rates of erosion were also studied for the three cases. The results show that the maximum erosion rate occurs at the center location as shown in Fig. 13. By making a comparison between the three cases for the dam storage volume. The results show that the center location had the minimum values for the dam storage volume, which means that a large amount of water has passed to the downstream area as shown in Fig. 14. According to these results, the center location leads to increased erosion rate and accelerated dam failure process compared with the two other cases. Because the erosion occurs on both sides, but in the case of edge location, the erosion occurs on one side.

3.5. The effect of upstream and downstream dam slopes

The results of the comparison between the different initial rectangular breach locations indicate that the worst initial breach location is the center location, so the fourth scenario from this study concentrated on studying the effect of a change in the upstream (Su) and downstream (Sd) dam slopes. Three slopes were checked individually for both upstream and downstream slopes to determine the worst case for the dam failure process. The first slope value is (2H:1V), the second slope value is (2.5H:1V), and the third slope value is (3H:1V). According to this scenario, the results show that the decreasing downstream slope angle leads to increasing time of peak outflow discharge (tP) and decreasing value of peak outflow discharge. The difference in the peak outflow values between the three cases for the downstream slope is 2%, as shown in Fig. 15, but changing the upstream slope has a negligible impact on the peak outflow discharge and its time as shown in Fig. 16.

The rates of erosion were also studied in the three cases for both upstream and downstream slopes. The results show that the maximum erosion rate increases by 6.0% with an increasing downstream slope angle by 4°, as shown in Fig. 17. The results also indicate that the erosion rates aren’t affected by increasing or decreasing the upstream slope angle, as shown in Fig. 18. According to these results, increasing the downstream slope angle leads to increased erosion rate and accelerated dam failure process compared with the upstream slope angle. Because of increasing shear stress applied by water flows in case of increasing downstream slope.

According to all previous scenarios, the dimensionless peak outflow discharge QPQin is presented for a fixed dam height (Ho) and inflow discharge (Qin). Fig. 19 illustrates the relationship between QP∗=QPQin and.

Lr=ho2/3∗bo2/3Ho. The deduced relationship achieves R2=0.96.(17)QP∗=2.2807exp-2.804∗Lr

4. Conclusions

A spatial dam breaching process was simulated by using FLOW-3D Software. The validation process was performed by making a comparison between the simulated results of dam profiles and the dam profiles obtained by Schmocker and Hager [7] in their experimental study. And also, the peak outflow value recorded an error percentage of 12% between the numerical model and the experimental study. This model was used to study the effect of initial breach shape, dimensions, location, and dam slopes on peak outflow discharge, time of peak outflow, and the erosion process. By using the parameters obtained from the validation process, the results of this study can be summarized in eight points as follows.1.

The rectangular initial breach shape leads to an accelerating dam failure process compared with the V-notch.2.

The value of peak outflow discharge in the case of a rectangular initial breach is higher than the V-notch shape by 5%.3.

The time of peak outflow discharge for a rectangular initial breach is shorter than the V-notch shape by 9%.4.

The minimum depth and maximum width for the initial breach achieve maximum erosion rates (increasing breach width, b0, or decreasing breach depth, h0, by 5% from the dam height leads to an increase in the maximum rate of erosion by 11% and 15%, respectively), so the dam failure is rapid.5.

The center location of the initial breach leads to an accelerating dam failure compared with the edge location.6.

The initial breach location has a negligible effect on the peak outflow discharge value and its time.7.

Increasing the downstream slope angle by 4° leads to an increase in both peak outflow discharge and maximum rate of erosion by 2.0% and 6.0%, respectively.8.

The upstream slope has a negligible effect on the dam breaching process.

References

[1]V. SinghDam breach modeling technologySpringer Science & Business Media (1996)Google Scholar[2]Wahl TL. Prediction of embankment dam breach parameters: a literature review and needs assessment. 1998.Google Scholar[3]Z. Alhasan, J. Jandora, J. ŘíhaStudy of dam-break due to overtopping of four small dams in the Czech RepublicActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63 (3) (2015), pp. 717-729 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[4]D. FreadBREACH, an erosion model for earthen dam failures: Hydrologic Research LaboratoryNOAA, National Weather Service (1988)Google Scholar[5]J. Říha, S. Kotaška, L. PetrulaDam Break Modeling in a Cascade of Small Earthen Dams: Case Study of the Čižina River in the Czech RepublicWater, 12 (8) (2020), p. 2309, 10.3390/w12082309 View PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[6]E. Goodarzi, L. Teang Shui, M. ZiaeiDam overtopping risk using probabilistic concepts–Case study: The Meijaran DamIran Ain Shams Eng J, 4 (2) (2013), pp. 185-197ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[7]L. Schmocker, W.H. HagerPlane dike-breach due to overtopping: effects of sediment, dike height and dischargeJ Hydraul Res, 50 (6) (2012), pp. 576-586 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[8]J.S. Walder, R.M. Iverson, J.W. Godt, M. Logan, S.A. SolovitzControls on the breach geometry and flood hydrograph during overtopping of noncohesive earthen damsWater Resour Res, 51 (8) (2015), pp. 6701-6724View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[9]H. Wei, M. Yu, D. Wang, Y. LiOvertopping breaching of river levees constructed with cohesive sedimentsNat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 16 (7) (2016), pp. 1541-1551 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[10]Y. Yang, S.-Y. Cao, K.-J. Yang, W.-P. LiYang K-j, Li W-p. Experimental study of breach process of landslide dams by overtopping and its initiation mechanismsJ Hydrodynamics, 27 (6) (2015), pp. 872-883ArticleDownload PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[11]G.G.D. Zhou, M. Zhou, M.S. Shrestha, D. Song, C.E. Choi, K.F.E. Cui, et al.Experimental investigation on the longitudinal evolution of landslide dam breaching and outburst floodsGeomorphology, 334 (2019), pp. 29-43ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[12]J. Zhang, Z.-x. Guo, S.-y. CaoYang F-g. Experimental study on scour and erosion of blocked damWater Sci Eng, 5 (2012), pp. 219-229ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[13]K. Höeg, A. Løvoll, K. VaskinnStability and breaching of embankment dams: Field tests on 6 m high damsInt J Hydropower Dams, 11 (2004), pp. 88-92View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[14]H. Hakimzadeh, V. Nourani, A.B. AminiGenetic programming simulation of dam breach hydrograph and peak outflow dischargeJ Hydrol Eng, 19 (4) (2014), pp. 757-768View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[15]A.R. Refaiy, N.M. AboulAtta, N.Y. Saad, D.A. El-MollaModeling the effect of downstream drain geometry on seepage through earth damsAin Shams Eng J, 12 (3) (2021), pp. 2511-2531ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[16]Y. Zhu, P.J. Visser, J.K. Vrijling, G. WangExperimental investigation on breaching of embankmentsScience China Technological Sci, 54 (1) (2011), pp. 148-155 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[17]M.-H. Yu, H.-Y. Wei, Y.-J. Liang, Y. ZhaoInvestigation of non-cohesive levee breach by overtopping flowJ Hydrodyn, 25 (4) (2013), pp. 572-579ArticleDownload PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[18]S. Wu, M. Yu, H. Wei, Y. Liang, J. ZengNon-symmetrical levee breaching processes in a channel bend due to overtoppingInt J Sedim Res, 33 (2) (2018), pp. 208-215ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[19]O. Saberi, G. ZenzNumerical investigation on 1D and 2D embankment dams failure due to overtopping flowInt J Hydraulic Engineering, 5 (2016), pp. 9-18View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[20]M. Guan, N.G. Wright, P.A. Sleigh2D Process-Based Morphodynamic Model for Flooding by Noncohesive Dyke BreachJ Hydraul Eng, 140 (7) (2014), p. 04014022, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000861 View PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[21]W. Wu, R. Marsooli, Z. HeDepth-Averaged Two-Dimensional Model of Unsteady Flow and Sediment Transport due to Noncohesive Embankment Break/BreachingJ Hydraul Eng, 138 (6) (2012), pp. 503-516View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[22]Z. Wang, D.S. BowlesThree-dimensional non-cohesive earthen dam breach model. Part 1: Theory and methodologyAdv Water Resour, 29 (10) (2006), pp. 1528-1545ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[23]Říha J, Duchan D, Zachoval Z, Erpicum S, Archambeau P, Pirotton M, et al. Performance of a shallow-water model for simulating flow over trapezoidal broad-crested weirs. J Hydrology Hydromechanics. 2019;67:322-8.Google Scholar[24]C.B. VreugdenhilNumerical methods for shallow-water flowSpringer Science & Business Media (1994)Google Scholar[25]L.A. Larocque, J. Imran, M.H. Chaudhry3D numerical simulation of partial breach dam-break flow using the LES and k–∊ turbulence modelsJ Hydraul Res, 51 (2) (2013), pp. 145-157 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[26]C. Yang, B. Lin, C. Jiang, Y. LiuPredicting near-field dam-break flow and impact force using a 3D modelJ Hydraul Res, 48 (6) (2010), pp. 784-792 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[27]FLOW-3D. Version 11.1.1 Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, NM. https://wwwflow3dcom.Google Scholar[28]C.W. Hirt, B.D. NicholsVolume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundariesJ Comput Phys, 39 (1) (1981), pp. 201-225ArticleDownload PDFGoogle Scholar[29]S.V. PatankarNumerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere PublCorp, New York, 58 (1980), p. 288View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[30]M. Alemi, R. MaiaNumerical simulation of the flow and local scour process around single and complex bridge piersInt J Civil Eng, 16 (5) (2018), pp. 475-487 View PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar

PDF 전체 원문 보기
Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions.

Experimental and numerical study of flow at a 90 degree lateral turnout with enhanced roughness coefficient and invert level changes

조도 계수 및 역전 수준 변화가 개선된 90도 측면 분출구에서의 유동에 대한 실험적 및 수치적 연구

Maryam Bagheri; Seyed M. Ali Zomorodian; Masih Zolghadr; H. Md. Azamathulla; C. Venkata Siva Rama Prasad

Abstract

측면 분기기(흡입구)의 상류 측에서 흐름 분리는 분기기 입구에서 와류를 일으키는 중요한 문제입니다. 이는 흐름의 유효 폭, 출력 용량 및 효율성을 감소시킵니다. 따라서 분리지대의 크기를 파악하고 크기를 줄이기 위한 방안을 제시하는 것이 필수적이다. 본 연구에서는 분리 구역의 치수를 줄이기 위한 방법으로 7가지 유형의 거칠기 요소를 분기구 입구에 설치하고 4가지 다른 배출(총 84번의 실험을 수행)과 함께 3개의 서로 다른 베드 반전 레벨을 조사했습니다. 또한 3D CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics) 모델을 사용하여 분리 영역의 흐름 패턴과 치수를 평가했습니다. 결과는 거칠기 계수를 향상시키면 분리 영역 치수를 최대 38%까지 줄일 수 있는 반면, 드롭 구현 효과는 사용된 거칠기 계수를 기반으로 이 영역을 다르게 축소할 수 있음을 보여주었습니다. 두 가지 방법을 결합하면 분리 영역 치수를 최대 63%까지 줄일 수 있습니다.

Flow separation at the upstream side of lateral turnouts (intakes) is a critical issue causing eddy currents at the turnout entrance. It reduces the effective width of flow, turnout capacity and efficiency. Therefore, it is essential to identify the dimensions of the separation zone and propose remedies to reduce its dimensions. Installation of 7 types of roughening elements at the turnout entrance and 3 different bed invert levels, with 4 different discharges (making a total of 84 experiments) were examined in this study as a method to reduce the dimensions of the separation zone. Additionally, a 3-D Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model was utilized to evaluate the flow pattern and dimensions of the separation zone. Results showed that enhancing the roughness coefficient can reduce the separation zone dimensions up to 38% while the drop implementation effect can scale down this area differently based on the roughness coefficient used. Combining both methods can reduce the separation zone dimensions up to 63%.

HIGHLIGHTS

Listen

  • Flow separation at the upstream side of lateral turnouts (intakes) is a critical issue causing eddy currents at the turnout entrance.
  • Installation of 7 types of roughening elements at the turnout entrance and 3 different bed level inverts were investigated.
  • Additionally, a 3-D Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model was utilized to evaluate the flow.
  • Combining both methods can reduce the separation zone dimensions by up to 63%.
Experimental and numerical study of flow at a 90 degree lateral turnout with enhanced roughness coefficient and invert level changes
Experimental and numerical study of flow at a 90 degree lateral turnout with enhanced roughness coefficient and invert level changes

Keywords

discharge ratio, flow separation zone, intake, three dimensional simulation

INTRODUCTION

Listen

Turnouts or intakes are amongst the oldest and most widely used hydraulic structures in irrigation networks. Turnouts are also used in water distribution, transmission networks, power generation facilities, and waste water treatment plants etc. The flows that enter a turnout have a strong momentum in the direction of the main waterway and that is why flow separation occurs inside the turnout. The horizontal vortex formed in the separation area is a suitable place for accumulation and deposition of sediments. The separation zone is a vulnerable area for sedimentation and for reduction of effective flow due to a contracted flow region in the lateral channel. Sedimentaion in the entrance of the intake can gradually be transfered into the lateral channel and decrease the capacity of the higher order channels over time (Jalili et al. 2011). On the other hand, the existence of coarse-grained materials causes erosion and destruction of the waterway side walls and bottom. In addition, sedimentation creates conditions for vegetation to take root and damage the waterway cover, which causes water to leak from its perimeter. Therefore, it is important to investigate the pattern of the flow separation area in turnouts and provide solutions to reduce the dimensions of this area.

The three-dimensional flow structure at turnouts is quite complex. In an experimental study by Neary & Odgaard (1993) in a 90-degree water turnout it was found that the secondary currents and separation zone varies from the bed to the water surface. They also found that at a 90-degree water turnout, the bed roughness and discharge ratio play a critical role in flow structure. They asserted that an explanation of sediment behavior at a diversion entrance requires a comprehensive understanding of 3D flow patterns around the lateral-channel entrance. In addition, they suggested that there is a strong similarity between flow in a channel bend and a diversion channel, and that this similarity can rationalize the use of bend flow models for estimation of 3D flow structures in diversion channels.

Some of the distinctive characteristics of dividing flow in a turnout include a zone of separation immediately near the entrance of the lateral turnout (separation zone), a contracted flow region in the branch channel (contracted flow), and a stagnation point near the downstream corner of the junction (stagnation zone). In the region downstream of the junction, along the continuous far wall, separation due to flow expansion may occur (Ramamurthy et al. 2007), that is, a separation zone. This can both reduce the turnout efficiency and the effective width of flow while increasing the sediment deposition in the turnout entrance (Jalili et al. 2011). Installation of submerged vanes in the turnout entrance is a method which is already applied to reduce the size of flow separation zones. The separation zone draws sediments and floating materials into themselves. This reduces effective cross-section area and reduces transmission capacity. These results have also been obtained in past studies, including by Ramamurthy et al. (2007) and in Jalili et al. (2011). Submerged vanes (Iowa vanes) are designed in order to modify the near-bed flow pattern and bed-sediment motion in the transverse direction of the river. The vanes are installed vertically on the channel bed, at an angle of attack which is usually oriented at 10–25 degrees to the local primary flow direction. Vane height is typically 0.2–0.5 times the local water depth during design flow conditions and vane length is 2–3 times its height (Odgaard & Wang 1991). They are vortex-generating devices that generate secondary circulation, thereby redistributing sediment within the channel cross section. Several factors affect the flow separation zone such as the ratio of lateral turnout discharge to main channel discharge, angle of lateral channel with respect to the main channel flow direction and size of applied submerged vanes. Nakato et al. (1990) found that sediment management using submerged vanes in the turnout entrance to Station 3 of the Council Bluffs plant, located on the Missouri River, is applicable and efficient. The results show submerged vanes are an appropriate solution for reduction of sediment deposition in a turnout entrance. The flow was treated as 3D and tests results were obtained for the flow characteristics of dividing flows in a 90-degree sharp-edged, junction. The main and lateral channel were rectangular with the same dimensions (Ramamurthy et al., 2007).

Keshavarzi & Habibi (2005) carried out experiments on intake with angles of 45, 67, 79 and 90 degrees in different discharge ratios and reported the optimum angle for inlet flow with the lowest flow separation area to be about 55 degrees. The predicted flow characteristics were validated using experimental data. The results indicated that the width and length of the separation zone increases with the increase in the discharge ratio Qr (ratio of outflow per unit width in the turnout to inflow per unit width in the main channel).

Abbasi et al. (2004) performed experiments to investigate the dimensions of the flow separation zone at a lateral turnout entrance. They demonstrated that the length and width of the separation zone decreases with the increasing ratio of lateral turn-out discharge. They also found that with a reducing angle of lateral turnout, the length of the separation zone scales up and width of separation zone reduces. Then they compared their observations with results of Kasthuri & Pundarikanthan (1987) who conducted some experiments in an open-channel junction formed by channels of equal width and an angle of lateral 90 degree turnout, which showed the dimensions of the separation zone in their experiments to be smaller than in previous studies. Kasthuri & Pundarikanthan (1987) studied vortex and flow separation dimensions at the entrance of a 90 degree channel. Results showed that increasing the diversion discharge ratio can reduce the length and width of the vortex area. They also showed that the length and width of the vortex area remain constant at diversion ratios greater than 0.7. Karami Moghaddam & Keshavarzi (2007) analyzed the flow characteristics in turnouts with angles of 55 and 90 degrees. They reported that the dimensions of the separation zone decrease by increasing the discharge ratio and reducing the turnout angle with respect to the main channel. Studies about flow separation zone can be found in Jalili et al. (2011), Nikbin & Borghei (2011), Seyedian et al. (2008).

Jamshidi et al. (2016) measured the dimensions of a flow separation zone in the presence of submerged vanes with five arrangements (parallel, stagger, compound, piney and butterflies). Results showed that the ratio of the width to the length of the separation zone (shape index) was between 0.2 and 0.28 for all arrangements.

Karami et al. (2017) developed a 3D computational fluid dynamic (CFD) code which was calibrated by measured data. They used the model to evaluate flow pattern, diversion ratio of discharge, strength of the secondary flow, and dimensions of the vortex inside the channel in various dikes and submerged vane installation scenarios. Results showed that the diversion ratio of discharge in the diversion channel is dependent on the width of the flow separation area in the main channel. A dike, perpendicular to the flow, doubles the ratio of diverted discharge and reduces the suspended sediment load compared with the base-line situation by creating outer arch conditions. In addition, increasing the longitudinal distance between vanes increases the velocity gradient between the vanes and leads to a more severe erosion of the bed near the vanes.Figure 1VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Laboratory channel dimensions.

Al-Zubaidy & Hilo (2021) used the Navier–Stokes equation to study the flow of incompressible fluids. Using the CFD software ANSYS Fluent 19.2, 3D flow patterns were simulated at a diversion channel. Their results showed good agreement using the comparison between the experimental and numerical results when the k-omega turbulence viscous model was employed. Simulation of the flow pattern was then done at the lateral channel junction using a variety of geometry designs. These improvements included changing the intake’s inclination angle and chamfering and rounding the inner corner of the intake mouth instead of the sharp edge. Flow parameters at the diversion including velocity streamlines, bed shear stress, and separation zone dimensions were computed in their study. The findings demonstrated that changing the 90° lateral intake geometry can improve the flow pattern and bed shear stress at the intake junction. Consequently, sedimentation and erosion problems are reduced. According to the conclusions of their study, a branching angle of 30° to 45° is the best configuration for increasing branching channel discharge, lowering branching channel sediment concentration.

The review of the literature shows that most of the studies deal with turnout angle, discharge ratio and implementation of vanes as techniques to reduce the area of the separation zone. This study examines the effect of roughness coefficient and drop implementation at the entrance of a 90-degree lateral turnout on the dimensions of the separation zone. As far as the authors are aware, these two variables have never been studied as a remedy to decrease the separation zone dimensions whilst enhancing turnout efficiency. Additionally, a three-dimensional numerical model is applied to simulate the flow pattern around the turnout. The numerical results are verified against experimental data.

METHOD

Experimental setup

Listen

The experiments were conducted in a 90 degree dividing flow laboratory channel. The main channel is 15 m long, 0.5 m wide and 0.4 m high and the branch channel is 3 m long, 0.35 m wide and 0.4 m high, as shown in Figure 1. The tests were carried out at 9.65 m from the beginning of the flume and were far enough from the inlet, so we were sure that the flow was fully developed. According to Kirkgöz & Ardiçlioğlu (1997) the length of the developing region would be approximantly 65 and 72 times the flow depth. In this study, the depth is 9 cm, which makes this condition.

Both the main and lateral channel had a slope of 0.0003 with side walls of concrete. A 100 hp pump discharged the water into a stilling basin at the entrance of the main flume. The discharge was measured using an ultrasonic discharge meter around the discharge pipe. Eighty-four experiments in total were carried out at range of 0.1<Fr<0.4 (Froude numbers in main channel and upstream of turnout). The depth of water in the main channel in the experiments was 9 cm, in which case the effect of surface tension can be considered; according to research by Zolghadr & Shafai Bejestan (2020) and Zolghadr et al. (2021), when the water depth is more than 6 cm, the effect of surface tension is reduced and can be ignored given that the separation phenomenon occurs in the boundary layer, the height of the roughness creates disturbances in growth and development of the boundary layer and, as a result, separation growth is also faced with disruption and its dimensions grow less compared to smooth surfaces. Similar conditions occur in case of drop implementation. A disturbance occurs in the growth of the boundary layer and as a result the separation zone dimensions decrease. In order to investigate the effect of roughness coefficient and drop implementation on the separation zone dimensions, four different discharges (16, 18, 21, 23 l/s) in subcritical conditions, seven Manning (Strickler) roughness coefficients (0.009, 0.011, 0.017, 0.023, 0.028, 0.030, 0.032) as shown in Figure 2 and three invert elevation differences between the main channel and lateral turnout invert (0, 5 and 10 cm) at the entrance of the turnout were considered. The Manning roughness coefficient values were selected based on available and feasible values for real conditions, so that 0.009 is equivalent to galvanized sheet roughness and selected for the baseline tests. 0.011 is for concrete with neat surface, 0.017 and 0.023 are for unfinished and gunite concrete respectively. 0.030 and 0.032 values are for concrete on irregular excavated rock (Chow 1959). The roughness coefficients were created by gluing sediment particles on a thin galvanized sheet which was installed at the upstream side of the lateral turnout. The values of roughness coefficients were calculated based on the Manning-Strickler formula. For this purpose, some uniformly graded sediment samples were prepared and the Manning roughness coefficient of each sample was determined with respect to the median size (D50) value pasted into the Manning-Strickler formula. Some KMnO4 was sifted in the main channel upstream to visualize and measure the dimensions of the separation zone. Consequently, when KMnO4 approached the lateral turnout a photo of the separation zone was taken from a top view. All the experiments were recorded and several photos were taken during the experiment after stablishment of steady flow conditions. The photos were then imported to AutoCAD to measure the separation zone dimensions. Because all the shooting was done with a high-definition camera and it was possible to zoom in, the results are very accurate.Figure 2VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Roughness plates.

The velocity values were also recorded by a one-dimensional velocity meter at 15 cm distance from the turnout entrance and in transverse direction (perpendicular to the flow direction).

The water level was also measured by depth gauges with a accuracy of 0.1 mm, and velocity in one direction with a single-dimensional KENEK LP 1100 with an accuracy of ±0.02 m/s (0–1 m/s), ± 0.04 m/s (1–2 m/s), ± 0.08 m/s (2–4 m/s), ±0.10 m/s (4–5 m/s).

Numerical simulation

ListenA FLOW-3D numerical model was utilized as a solver of the Navier-Stokes equation to simulate the three-dimensional flow field at the entrance of the turnout. The governing equations included continuity momentum equations. The continuity equation, regardless of the density of the fluid in the form of Cartesian coordinates x, y, and z, is as follows:

formula

(1)where u, v, and w represent the velocity components in the x, y, and z directions, respectively; Ax, Ay, and Az are the surface flow fractions in the x, y, and z directions, respectively; VF denotes flow volume fraction; r is the density of the fluid; t is time; and Rsor refers to the source of the mass. Equations (2)–(4) show momentum equations in x, y and z dimensions respectively :

formula

(2)

formula

(3)

formula

(4)where Gx, Gy, and Gz are the accelerations caused by gravity in the x, y, and z directions, respectively; and fx, fy, and fz are the accelerations caused by viscosity in the x, y, and z directions, respectively.

The turbulence models used in this study were the renormalized group (RNG) models. Evaluation of the concordance of the mentioned models with experimental studies showed that the RNG model provides more accurate results.

Two blocks of mesh were used to simulate the main channels and lateral turnout. The meshes were denser in the vicinity of the entrance of the turnout in order to increase the accuracy of computations. Boundary conditions for the main mesh block included inflow for the channel entrance (volumetric flow rate), outflow for the channel exit, ‘wall’ for the bed and the right boundary and ‘symmetry’ for the top (free surface) and left boundaries (turnout). The side wall roughness coefficient was given to the software as the Manning number in surface roughness of any component. Considering the restrictions in the available processor, a main mesh block with appropriate mesh size was defined to simulate the main flow field in the channel, while the nested mesh-block technique was utilized to create a very dense solution field near the roughness plate in order to provide accurate results around the plates and near the entrance of the lateral turnout. This technique reduced the number of required mesh elements by up to 60% in comparison with the method in which the mesh size of the main solution field was decreased to the required extent.

The numerical outputs are verified against experimental data. The hydraulic characteristics of the experiment are shown in Table 1.Table 1

Hydraulic conditions of the flow

Q(L/s)FrY1 (m)Q2/Q1
16 0.449 0.09 0.22 
18 0.335 0.09 0.61 
21 0.242 0.09 0.71 
23 0.180 0.09 1.04 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Experimental results

Listen

During the experiments, the dimensions of the separation zone were recorded with an HD camera. Some photos were imported to AutoCad software. Then, the separation zones dimensions were measured and compared in different scenarios.

At the beginning, the flow pattern in the separation zone for four different hydraulic conditions was studied for seven different Manning roughness coefficients from 0.009 to 0.032. To compare the obtained results, roughness of 0.009 was considered as the base line. The percentage of reduction in separation zone area in different roughness coefficients is shown in Figure 3. According to this figure, by increasing the roughness of the turnout side wall, the separation zone area ratio reduces (ratio of separation zone area to turnout area). In other words, in any desired Froud number, the highest dimensions of the separation zone area are related to the lowest roughness coefficients. In Figure 3, ‘A’ is the area of the separation zone and ‘Ai’ represents the total area of the turnout.Figure 3VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions.Figure 4VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions.

It should be mentioned that the separation zone dimensions change with depth, so that the area is larger at the surface than near the bed. This study measured the dimensions of this area at the surface. Figure 4 show exactly where the roughness elements were located.Figure 5VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Comparison of separation zone for n=0.023 and n=0.032.

Figure 5 shows images of the separation zone at n=0.023 and n=0.032 as examples, and show that the separation area at n=0.032 is smaller than that of n=0.023.

The difference between the effect of the two 0.032 and 0.030 roughnesses is minor. In other words, the dimensions of the separation zone decreased by increasing roughness up to 0.030 and then remained with negligable changes.

In the next step, the effect of intake invert relative to the main stream (drop) on the dimensions of the separation zone was investigated. To do this, three different invert levels were considered: (1) without drop; (2) a 5 cm drop between the main canal and intake canal; and (3) a 10 cm drop between the main canal and intake canal. The without drop mode was considered as the control state. Figure 6 shows the effect of drop implementation on separation zone dimensions. Tables 2 and 3 show the reduced percentage of separation zone areas in 5 and 10 cm drop compared to no drop conditions as the base line. It was found that the best results were obtained when a 10 cm drop was implemented.Table 2

Decrease percentage of separation zone area in 5 cm drop

Frn=0.011n=0.017n=0.023n=0.028n=0.030n=0.032
0.08 10.56 11.06 25.27 33.03 35.57 36.5 
0.121 7.66 11.14 11.88 15.93 34.59 36.25 
0.353 1.38 2.63 8.17 14.39 31.20 31.29 
0.362 3 11.54 19.56 25.73 37.89 38.31 

Table 3

Decrease percentage of separation zone area in 10 cm drop

Frn=0.011n=0.017n=0.023n=0.028n=0.030n=0.032
0.047 4.30 8.75 23.47 31.22 34.96 35.13 
0.119 11.01 13.16 15.02 21.48 39.45 40.68 
0.348 3.89 5.71 9.82 16.09 29 30.96 
0.354 2.84 10.44 18.42 25.45 35.68 35.76 

Figure 6VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Effect of drop implementation on separation zone dimensions.

The combined effect of drop and roughness is shown in Figure 7. According to this figure, by installing a drop structure at the entrance of the intake, the dimensions of the separation zone scales down in any desired roughness coefficient. Results indicated that by increasing the roughness coefficient or drop implementation individually, the separation zone area decreases up to 38 and 25% respectively. However, employing both techniques simultaneously can reduce the separation zone area up to 63% (Table 4). The reason for the reduction of the dimensions of the separation zone area by drop implementation can be attributed to the increase of discharge ratio. This reduces the dimensions of the separation zone area.Table 4

Reduction in percentage of combined effect of roughness and 10 cm drop

Qin=0.011n=0.017n=0.023n=0.028n=0.030n=0.032
16 32.3 35.07 37.2 45.7 58.01 59.1 
18 44.5 34.15 36.18 48.13 54.2 56.18 
21 43.18 32.33 42.30 37.79 57.16 63.2 
23 40.56 34.5 34.09 46.25 50.12 57.2 

Figure 7VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Combined effect of roughness and drop on separation zone dimensions.

This method increases the discharge ratio (ratio of turnout to main channel discharge). The results are compatible with the literature. Some other researchers reported that increasing the discharge ratio can scale down the separation zone dimensions (Karami Moghaddam & Keshavarzi 2007; Ramamurthy et al. 2007). However, these researchers employed other methods to enhance the discharge ratio. Drop implementation is simple and applicable in practice, since there is normally an elevation difference between the main and lateral canal in irrigation networks to ensure gravity flow occurance.

Table 4 depicts the decrease in percentage of the separation zone compared to base line conditions in different arrangements of the combined tests.Figure 8VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Velocity profiles for various roughness coefficients along turnout width.

A comparison between the proposed methods introduced in this paper and traditional methods such as installation of submerged vanes, and changing the inlet geometry (angle, radius) was performed. Figure 8 shows the comparison of the results. The comparison shows that the new techniques can be highly influential and still practical. In this research, with no change in structural geometry (enhancement of roughness coefficient) or minor changes with respect to drop implementation, the dimensions of the separation zone are decreased noticeably. The velocity values were also recorded by a one-dimensional velocity meter at 15 cm distance from the turnout entrance and in a transverse direction (perpendicular to the flow direction). The results are shown in Figure 9.Figure 9VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions in numerical study.

Numerical results

Listen

This study examined the flow patterns around the entrance of a diversion channel due to various wall roughnesses in the diversion channel. Results indicated that increasing the discharge ratio in the main channel and diversion channel reduces the area of the separation zone in the diversion channel.Figure 10VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Comparision of the vortex area (software output) for three roughnesses (0.009, 0.023 and 0.032).A laboratory and numerical error rate of 0.2605 was calculated from the following formula,

formula

where Uexp is the experimental result, Unum is the numerical result, and N is the number of data.

Figure 9 shows the effect of roughness on separation zone dimensions in numerical study. Figure 10 compares the vortex area (software output) for three roughnesses, 0.009, 0.023 and 0.032 and Figure 11 shows the flow lines (tecplot output) that indicate the effect of roughness on flow in the separation zone. Numerical analysis shows that by increasing the roughness coefficient, the dimensions of the separation zone area decrease, as shown in Figure 10 where the separation zone area at n=0.032 is less than the separation zone area at n=0.009.Figure 11VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Comparison of vortex area in 3D mode (tecplot output) with two roughnesses (a) 0.009 and (b) 0.032.Figure 12VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Velocity vector for flow condition Q1/422 l/s, near surface.

The velocities intensified moving midway toward the turnout showing that the effective area is scaled down. The velocity values were almost equal to zero near the side walls as expected. As shown in Figure 12 the approach vortex area velocity decreases. Experimental and numerical measured velocity at x=0.15 m of the diversion channel compared in Figure 13 shows that away from the separation zone area, the velocity increases. All longitudinal velocity contours near the vortex area are distinctly different between different roughnesses. The separation zone is larger at less roughness both in length and width.Figure 13VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Exprimental and numerical measured velocity.

CONCLUSION

Listen

This study introduces practical and feasible methods for enhancing turnout efficiency by reducing the separation zone dimensions. Increasing the roughness coefficient and implementation of inlet drop were considered as remedies for reduction of separation zone dimensions. A data set has been compiled that fully describes the complex, 3D flow conditions present in a 90 degree turnout channel for selected flow conditions. The aim of this numerical model was to compare the results of a laboratory model in the area of the separation zone and velocity. Results showed that enhancing roughness coefficient reduce the separation zone dimensions up to 38% while the drop implementation effect can scale down this area differently based on roughness coefficient used. Combining both methods can reduce the separation zone dimensions up to 63%. Further research is proposed to investigate the effect of roughness and drop implementation on sedimentation pattern at lateral turnouts. The dimensions of the separation zone decreases with the increase of the non-dimensional parameter, due to the reduction ratio of turnout discharge increasing in all the experiments.

This method increases the discharge ratio (ratio of turnout to main channel discharge). The results are compatible with the literature. Other researchers have reported that intensifying the discharge ratio can scale down the separation zone dimensions (Karami Moghaddam & Keshavarzi 2007; Ramamurthy et al. 2007). However, they employed other methods to enhance the discharge ratio. Employing both techniques simultaneously can decrease the separation zone dimensions up to 63%. A comparison between the new methods introduced in this paper and traditional methods such as installation of submerged vanes, and changing the inlet geometry (angle, radius) was performed. The comparison shows that the new techniques can be highly influential and still practical. The numerical and laboratory models are in good agreement and show that the method used in this study has been effective in reducing the separation area. This method is simple, economical and can prevent sediment deposition in the intake canal. Results show that CFD prediction of the fluid through the separation zone at the canal intake can be predicted reasonably well and the RNG model offers the best results in terms of predictability.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Listen

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

REFERENCES

Abbasi A., Ghodsian M., Habibi M. & Salehi Neishabouri S. A. 2004 Experimental investigation on dimensions of flow separation zone at lateral intakeentrance. Research & Construction; Pajouhesh va Sazandegi 62, 38–44. (In Persian).Google Scholar Al-Zubaidy R. & Hilo A. 2021 Numerical investigation of flow behavior at the lateral intake using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.172.Google Scholar Chow V. T. 1959 Open Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Jalili H., Hosseinzadeh Dalir A. & Farsadizadeh D. 2011 Effect of intake geometry on the sediment transport and lateral flow pattern. Iranian Water Research Journal 5 (9), 1–10. (In Persian).Google Scholar Jamshidi A., Farsadizadeh D. & Hosseinzadeh Dalir A. 2016 Variations of flow separation zone at lateral intake entrance using submerged vanes. Journal of Civil Engineering Urban 6 (3), 54–63. Journal homepage. Available from: www.ojceu.ir/main.Google Scholar Karami Moghaddam K. & Keshavarzi A. 2007 Investigation of flow structure in lateral intakes of 55° and 90° with rounded entrance edge. In: 03 National Congress on Civil Engineering University of Tabriz. Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/16317. (In Persian).Google Scholar Karami H., Farzin S., Sadrabadi M. T. & Moazeni H. 2017 Simulation of flow pattern at rectangular lateral intake with different dike and submerged vane scenarios. Journal of Water Science and Engineering 10 (3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2017.10.001.Google ScholarCrossref  Kasthuri B. & Pundarikanthan N. V. 1987 Discussion on separation zone at open- channel junction. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 113 (4), 543–548.Google ScholarCrossref  Keshavarzi A. & Habibi L. 2005 Optimizing water intake angle by flow separation analysis. Journal of Irrigation and Drain 54, 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.207.Google ScholarCrossref  Kirkgöz M. S. & Ardiçlioğlu M. 1997 Velocity profiles of developing and developed open channel flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1099–1105. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:12(1099).Google Scholar Nakato T., Kennedy J. F. & Bauerly D. 1990 Pumpstation intake-shoaling control with submerge vanes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:1(119).Google Scholar Neary V. S. & Odgaard J. A. 1993 Three-dimensional flow structure at open channel diversions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ASCE 119 (11), 1224–1230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:11(1223).Google ScholarCrossref  Nikbin S. & Borghei S. M. 2011 Experimental investigation of submerged vanes effect on dimensions of flow separation zone at a 90° openchannel junction. In: 06rd National Congress on Civil Engineering University of Semnan. (In Persian). Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/120494.Google Scholar Odgaard J. A. & Wang Y. 1991 Sediment management with submerged vanes, I: theory. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 117 (3), 267–283.Google ScholarCrossref  Ramamurthy A. S., Junying Q. & Diep V. 2007 Numerical and experimental study of dividing open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. See: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:10(1135).Google Scholar Seyedian S., Karami Moghaddam K. & Shafai Begestan M. 2008 Determining the optimal radius in lateral intakes of 55° and 90° using variation of flow velocity. In: 07th Iranian Hydraulic Conference. Power & Water University of Technology (PWUT). (In Persian). Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/56251.Google Scholar Zolghadr M. & Shafai Bejestan M. 2020 Six legged concrete (SLC) elements as scour countermeasures at wing wall bridge abutments. International Journal of River Basin Management. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2020.1726357.Google Scholar Zolghadr M., Zomorodian S. M. A., Shabani R. & Azamatulla H.Md. 2021 Migration of sand mining pit in rivers: an experimental, numerical and case study. Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108944.Google Scholar © 2022 The AuthorsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PDF View
Figure 8: Instantaneous flow structures extracted using the Q-criterion (Qcriterion=1200) and colored by the magnitude of flow velocity.

Hybrid modeling on 3D hydraulic features of a step-pool unit

Chendi Zhang1
, Yuncheng Xu1,2, Marwan A Hassan3
, Mengzhen Xu1
, Pukang He1
1State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. 2
College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100081, China.
5 3Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver BC, V6T1Z2, Canada.
Correspondence to: Chendi Zhang (chendinorthwest@163.com) and Mengzhen Xu (mzxu@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn)

Abstract

스텝 풀 시스템은 계류의 일반적인 기반이며 전 세계의 하천 복원 프로젝트에 활용되었습니다. 스텝 풀 장치는 스텝 풀 기능의 형태학적 진화 및 안정성과 밀접하게 상호 작용하는 것으로 보고된 매우 균일하지 않은 수력 특성을 나타냅니다.

그러나 스텝 풀 형태에 대한 3차원 수리학의 자세한 정보는 측정의 어려움으로 인해 부족했습니다. 이러한 지식 격차를 메우기 위해 SfM(Structure from Motion) 및 CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics) 기술을 기반으로 하이브리드 모델을 구축했습니다. 이 모델은 CFD 시뮬레이션을 위한 입력으로 6가지 유속의 자연석으로 만든 인공 스텝 풀 장치가 있는 침대 표면의 3D 재구성을 사용했습니다.

하이브리드 모델은 스텝 풀 장치에 대한 3D 흐름 구조의 고해상도 시각화를 제공하는 데 성공했습니다. 결과는 계단 아래의 흐름 영역의 분할, 즉 수면에서의 통합 점프, 침대 근처의 줄무늬 후류 및 그 사이의 고속 제트를 보여줍니다.

수영장에서 난류 에너지의 매우 불균일한 분포가 밝혀졌으며 비슷한 용량을 가진 두 개의 에너지 소산기가 수영장에 공존하는 것으로 나타났습니다. 흐름 증가에 따른 풀 세굴 개발은 점프 및 후류 와류의 확장으로 이어지지만 이러한 증가는 스텝 풀 실패에 대한 임계 조건에 가까운 높은 흐름에서 점프에 대해 멈춥니다.

음의 경사면에서 발달된 곡물 20 클러스터와 같은 미세 지반은 국부 수력학에 상당한 영향을 주지만 이러한 영향은 수영장 바닥에서 억제됩니다. 스텝 스톤의 항력은 가장 높은 흐름이 사용되기 전에 배출과 함께 증가하는 반면 양력은 더 큰 크기와 더 넓은 범위를 갖습니다. 우리의 결과는 계단 풀 형태의 복잡한 흐름 특성을 조사할 때 물리적 및 수치적 모델링을 결합한 하이브리드 모델 접근 방식의 가능성과 큰 잠재력을 강조합니다.

Step-pool systems are common bedforms in mountain streams and have been utilized in river restoration projects around the world. Step-pool units exhibit highly non-uniform hydraulic characteristics which have been reported to closely 10 interact with the morphological evolution and stability of step-pool features. However, detailed information of the threedimensional hydraulics for step-pool morphology has been scarce due to the difficulty of measurement. To fill in this knowledge gap, we established a hybrid model based on the technologies of Structure from Motion (SfM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The model used 3D reconstructions of bed surfaces with an artificial step-pool unit built by natural stones at six flow rates as inputs for CFD simulations. The hybrid model succeeded in providing high-resolution visualization 15 of 3D flow structures for the step-pool unit. The results illustrate the segmentation of flow regimes below the step, i.e., the integral jump at the water surface, streaky wake vortexes near the bed, and high-speed jets in between. The highly non-uniform distribution of turbulence energy in the pool has been revealed and two energy dissipaters with comparable capacity are found to co-exist in the pool. Pool scour development under flow increase leads to the expansion of the jump and wake vortexes but this increase stops for the jump at high flows close to the critical condition for step-pool failure. The micro-bedforms as grain 20 clusters developed on the negative slope affect the local hydraulics significantly but this influence is suppressed at pool bottom. The drag forces on the step stones increase with discharge before the highest flow is used while the lift force has a larger magnitude and wider varying range. Our results highlight the feasibility and great potential of the hybrid model approach combining physical and numerical modeling in investigating the complex flow characteristics of step-pool morphology.

Figure 1: Workflow of the hybrid modeling. SfM-MVS refers to the technology of Structure from Motion with Multi View Stereo. DSM is short for digital surface model. RNG-VOF is short for Renormalized Group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model coupled with Volume of Fluid method.
Figure 1: Workflow of the hybrid modeling. SfM-MVS refers to the technology of Structure from Motion with Multi View Stereo. DSM is short for digital surface model. RNG-VOF is short for Renormalized Group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model coupled with Volume of Fluid method.
Figure 2: Flume experiment settings in Zhang et al., (2020): (a) the artificially built-up step-pool model using natural stones, with stone number labelled; (b) the unsteady hydrograph of the run of CIFR (continually-increasing-flow-rate) T2 used in this study.
Figure 2: Flume experiment settings in Zhang et al., (2020): (a) the artificially built-up step-pool model using natural stones, with stone number labelled; (b) the unsteady hydrograph of the run of CIFR (continually-increasing-flow-rate) T2 used in this study.
Figure 3: Setup of the CFD model: (a) three-dimensional digital surface model (DSM) of the step-pool unit by structure from motion with multi view stereo (SfM-MVS) method as the input to the 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling; (b) extruded bed 160 surface model connected to the extra downstream component (in purple blue) and rectangular columns to fill leaks (in green), with the boundary conditions shown on mesh planes; (c) recognized geometry with mesh grids of two mesh blocks shown where MS is short for mesh size; (d) sampling volumes to capture the flow forces acting on each step stone at X, Y, and Z directions; and (e) an example for the simulated 3D flow over the step-pool unit colored by velocity magnitude at the discharge of 49.9 L/s. The abbreviations for boundary conditions in (b) are: V for specified velocity; C for continuative; P for specific pressure; and W for wall 165 condition. The contraction section in Figure (e) refers to the edge between the jet and jump at water surface.
Figure 3: Setup of the CFD model: (a) three-dimensional digital surface model (DSM) of the step-pool unit by structure from motion with multi view stereo (SfM-MVS) method as the input to the 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling; (b) extruded bed 160 surface model connected to the extra downstream component (in purple blue) and rectangular columns to fill leaks (in green), with the boundary conditions shown on mesh planes; (c) recognized geometry with mesh grids of two mesh blocks shown where MS is short for mesh size; (d) sampling volumes to capture the flow forces acting on each step stone at X, Y, and Z directions; and (e) an example for the simulated 3D flow over the step-pool unit colored by velocity magnitude at the discharge of 49.9 L/s. The abbreviations for boundary conditions in (b) are: V for specified velocity; C for continuative; P for specific pressure; and W for wall 165 condition. The contraction section in Figure (e) refers to the edge between the jet and jump at water surface.
Figure 4: Distribution of time-averaged velocity magnitude (VM_mean) and vectors in three longitudinal sections. The section at Y = 0 cm goes across the keystone while the other two (Y = -18 and 13.5 cm) are located at the step stones beside the keystone with 265 lower top elevations. Q refers to the discharge at the inlet of the computational domain. The spacing for X, Y, and Z axes are all 10 cm in the plots.
Figure 4: Distribution of time-averaged velocity magnitude (VM_mean) and vectors in three longitudinal sections. The section at Y = 0 cm goes across the keystone while the other two (Y = -18 and 13.5 cm) are located at the step stones beside the keystone with lower top elevations. Q refers to the discharge at the inlet of the computational domain. The spacing for X, Y, and Z axes are all 10 cm in the plots.
Figure 5: Distribution of time-averaged flow velocity at five cross sections which are set according to the reference section (x0). The reference cross section x0 is located at the downstream end of the keystone (KS). The five sections are located at 18 cm and 6 cm upstream of the reference section (x0-18 and x0-6), and 2 cm, 15 cm and 40 cm downstream of the reference section (x0+2, x0+15, x0+40). The spacing for X, Y, and Z axes are all 10 cm in the plots.
Figure 5: Distribution of time-averaged flow velocity at five cross sections which are set according to the reference section (x0). The reference cross section x0 is located at the downstream end of the keystone (KS). The five sections are located at 18 cm and 6 cm upstream of the reference section (x0-18 and x0-6), and 2 cm, 15 cm and 40 cm downstream of the reference section (x0+2, x0+15, x0+40). The spacing for X, Y, and Z axes are all 10 cm in the plots.
Figure 6: Distribution of the time-averaged turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) at the five cross sections same with Figure 3.
Figure 6: Distribution of the time-averaged turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) at the five cross sections same with Figure 3.
Figure 7: Boxplots for the distributions of the mass-averaged flow kinetic energy (KE, panels a-f), turbulence kinetic energy (TKE, panels g-l), and turbulent dissipation (εT, panels m-r) in the pool for all the six tested discharges (the plots at the same discharge are in the same row). The mass-averaged values were calculated every 2 cm in the streamwise direction. The flow direction is from left to right in all the plots. The general locations of the contraction section for all the flow rates are marked by the dashed lines, except for Q = 5 L/s when the jump is located too close to the step. The longitudinal distance taken up by negative slope in the pool for the inspected range is shown by shaded area in each plot.
Figure 7: Boxplots for the distributions of the mass-averaged flow kinetic energy (KE, panels a-f), turbulence kinetic energy (TKE, panels g-l), and turbulent dissipation (εT, panels m-r) in the pool for all the six tested discharges (the plots at the same discharge are in the same row). The mass-averaged values were calculated every 2 cm in the streamwise direction. The flow direction is from left to right in all the plots. The general locations of the contraction section for all the flow rates are marked by the dashed lines, except for Q = 5 L/s when the jump is located too close to the step. The longitudinal distance taken up by negative slope in the pool for the inspected range is shown by shaded area in each plot.
Figure 8: Instantaneous flow structures extracted using the Q-criterion (Qcriterion=1200) and colored by the magnitude of flow velocity.
Figure 8: Instantaneous flow structures extracted using the Q-criterion (Qcriterion=1200) and colored by the magnitude of flow velocity.
Figure 9: Time-averaged dynamic pressure (DP_mean) on the bed surface in the step-pool model under the two highest discharges, with the step numbers marked. The negative values in the plots result from the setting of standard atmospheric pressure = 0 Pa, whose absolute value is 1.013×105 Pa.
Figure 9: Time-averaged dynamic pressure (DP_mean) on the bed surface in the step-pool model under the two highest discharges, with the step numbers marked. The negative values in the plots result from the setting of standard atmospheric pressure = 0 Pa, whose absolute value is 1.013×105 Pa.
Figure 10: Time-averaged shear stress (SS_mean) on bed surface in the step-pool model, with the step numbers marked. The standard atmospheric pressure is set as 0 Pa.
Figure 10: Time-averaged shear stress (SS_mean) on bed surface in the step-pool model, with the step numbers marked. The standard atmospheric pressure is set as 0 Pa.
Figure 11: Variation of fluid force components and magnitude of resultant flow force acting on step stones with flow rate. The stone 4 is the keystone. Stone numbers are consistent with those in Fig. 9-10. The upper limit of the sampling volumes for flow force calculation is higher than water surface while the lower limit is set at 3 cm lower than the keystone crest.
Figure 11: Variation of fluid force components and magnitude of resultant flow force acting on step stones with flow rate. The stone 4 is the keystone. Stone numbers are consistent with those in Fig. 9-10. The upper limit of the sampling volumes for flow force calculation is higher than water surface while the lower limit is set at 3 cm lower than the keystone crest.
Figure 12: Variation of drag (CD) and lift (CL) coefficient of the step stones along with flow rate. Stone numbers are consistent with those in Fig. 8-9. KS is short for keystone. The negative values of CD correspond to the drag forces towards the upstream while the negative values of CL correspond to lift forces pointing downwards.
Figure 12: Variation of drag (CD) and lift (CL) coefficient of the step stones along with flow rate. Stone numbers are consistent with those in Fig. 8-9. KS is short for keystone. The negative values of CD correspond to the drag forces towards the upstream while the negative values of CL correspond to lift forces pointing downwards.
Figure 13: Longitudinal distributions of section-averaged and -integral turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) for the jump and wake vortexes at the largest three discharges. The flow direction is from left to right in all the plots. The general locations of the contraction sections under the three flow rates are marked by dashed lines in figures (d) to (f).
Figure 13: Longitudinal distributions of section-averaged and -integral turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) for the jump and wake vortexes at the largest three discharges. The flow direction is from left to right in all the plots. The general locations of the contraction sections under the three flow rates are marked by dashed lines in figures (d) to (f).
Figure A1: Water surface profiles of the simulations with different mesh sizes at the discharge of 43.6 L/s at the longitudinal sections at: (a) Y = 24.5 cm (left boundary); (b) Y = 0.3 cm (middle section); (c) Y = -24.5 cm (right boundary). MS is short for mesh size. The flow direction is from left to right in each plot.
Figure A1: Water surface profiles of the simulations with different mesh sizes at the discharge of 43.6 L/s at the longitudinal sections at: (a) Y = 24.5 cm (left boundary); (b) Y = 0.3 cm (middle section); (c) Y = -24.5 cm (right boundary). MS is short for mesh size. The flow direction is from left to right in each plot.
Figure A2: Contours of velocity magnitude in the longitudinal section at Y = 0 cm at different mesh sizes (MSs) under the flow condition with the discharge of 43.6 L/s: (a) 0.50 cm; (b) 0.375 cm; (c) 0.30 cm; (d) 0.27 cm; (e) 0.25 cm; (f) 0.24 cm. The flow direction is from left to right.
Figure A2: Contours of velocity magnitude in the longitudinal section at Y = 0 cm at different mesh sizes (MSs) under the flow condition with the discharge of 43.6 L/s: (a) 0.50 cm; (b) 0.375 cm; (c) 0.30 cm; (d) 0.27 cm; (e) 0.25 cm; (f) 0.24 cm. The flow direction is from left to right.
Figure A3: Measurements of water surfaces (orange lines) used in model verification: (a) water surface profiles from both sides of the flume; (b) upstream edge of the jump regime from top view. KS refers to keystone in figure (b).
Figure A3: Measurements of water surfaces (orange lines) used in model verification: (a) water surface profiles from both sides of the flume; (b) upstream edge of the jump regime from top view. KS refers to keystone in figure (b).
Figure A15. Figure (a) shows the locations of the cross sections and target coarse grains at Q = 49.9 L/s. Figures (b) to (e) show the distribution of velocity magnitude (VM_mean) in the four chosen cross sections: (a) x0+8.0; (b) x0+14.0; (c) x0+21.5; (d) x0+42.5. G1 to G6 refer to 6 protruding grains in the micro-bedforms in the pool.
Figure A15. Figure (a) shows the locations of the cross sections and target coarse grains at Q = 49.9 L/s. Figures (b) to (e) show the distribution of velocity magnitude (VM_mean) in the four chosen cross sections: (a) x0+8.0; (b) x0+14.0; (c) x0+21.5; (d) x0+42.5. G1 to G6 refer to 6 protruding grains in the micro-bedforms in the pool.
Figure A16. The distribution of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in the same cross sections as in figure S15: (a) x0+8.0; (b) x0+14.0; (c) x0+21.5; (d) x0+42.5.
Figure A16. The distribution of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in the same cross sections as in figure S15: (a) x0+8.0; (b) x0+14.0; (c) x0+21.5; (d) x0+42.5.

References

720 Aberle, J. and Smart, G. M: The influence of roughness structure on flow resistance on steep slopes, J. Hydraul. Res., 41(3),
259-269, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680309499971, 2003.
Abrahams, A. D., Li, G., and Atkinson, J. F.: Step-pool streams: Adjustment to maximum flow resistance. Water Resour. Res.,
31(10), 2593-2602, https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR01957, 1995.
Adrian, R. J.: Twenty years of particle image velocimetry. Exp. Fluids, 39(2), 159-169, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-
725 0991-7 2005.
Chanson, H.: Hydraulic design of stepped spillways and downstream energy dissipators. Dam Eng., 11(4), 205-242, 2001.
Chartrand, S. M., Jellinek, M., Whiting, P. J., and Stamm, J.: Geometric scaling of step-pools in mountain streams:
Observations and implications, Geomorphology, 129(1-2), 141-151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.020,
2011.
730 Chen, Y., DiBiase, R. A., McCarroll, N., and Liu, X.: Quantifying flow resistance in mountain streams using computational
fluid dynamics modeling over structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry‐derived microtopography, Earth Surf. Proc.
Land., 44(10), 1973-1987, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4624, 2019.
Church, M. and Zimmermann, A.: Form and stability of step‐pool channels: Research progress, Water Resour. Res., 43(3),
W03415, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005037, 2007.
735 Cignoni, P., Callieri, M., Corsini, M., Dellepiane, M., Ganovelli, F., and Ranzuglia, G.: Meshlab: an open-source mesh
processing tool, in: Eurographics Italian chapter conference, Salerno, Italy, 2-4 July 2008, 129-136, 2008.

Comiti, F., Andreoli, A., and Lenzi, M. A.: Morphological effects of local scouring in step-pool streams, Earth Surf. Proc.
Land., 30(12), 1567-1581, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1217, 2005.
Comiti, F., Cadol, D., and Wohl, E.: Flow regimes, bed morphology, and flow resistance in self‐formed step-pool
740 channels, Water Resour. Res., 45(4), 546-550, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007259, 2009.
Dudunake, T., Tonina, D., Reeder, W. J., and Monsalve, A.: Local and reach‐scale hyporheic flow response from boulder ‐
induced geomorphic changes, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2020WR027719, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027719, 2020.
Flow Science.: Flow-3D Version 11.2 User Manual, Flow Science, Inc., Los Alamos, 2016.
Gibson, S., Heath, R., Abraham, D., and Schoellhamer, D.: Visualization and analysis of temporal trends of sand infiltration
745 into a gravel bed, Water Resour. Res., 47(12), W12601, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010486, 2011.
Hassan, M. A., Tonina, D., Beckie, R. D., and Kinnear, M.: The effects of discharge and slope on hyporheic flow in step‐pool
morphologies, Hydrol. Process., 29(3), 419-433, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10155, 2015.
Hirt, C. W. and Nichols, B. D.: Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys., 39,
201-225, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5, 1981.
750 Javernick L., Brasington J., and Caruso B.: Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using structure-from-motion
photogrammetry, Geomorphology, 213(4), 166-182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.006, 2014.
Lai, Y. G., Smith, D. L., Bandrowski, D. J., Xu, Y., Woodley, C. M., and Schnell, K.: Development of a CFD model and
procedure for flows through in-stream structures, J. Appl. Water Eng. Res., 1-15,
https://doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2021.1964388, 2021.
755 Lenzi, M. A.: Step-pool evolution in the Rio Cordon, northeastern Italy, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 26(9), 991-1008,
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.239, 2001.
Lenzi, M. A.: Stream bed stabilization using boulder check dams that mimic step-pool morphology features in Northern
Italy, Geomorphology, 45(3-4), 243-260, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00157-X, 2002.
Lenzi, M. A., Marion, A., and Comiti, F.: Local scouring at grade‐control structures in alluvial mountain rivers, Water Resour.
760 Res., 39(7), 1176, https://doi:10.1029/2002WR001815, 2003.
Li, W., Wang Z., Li, Z., Zhang, C., and Lv, L.: Study on hydraulic characteristics of step-pool system, Adv. Water Sci., 25(3),
374-382, https://doi.org/10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2014.03.012, 2014. (In Chinese with English abstract)
Maas, H. G., Gruen, A., and Papantoniou, D.: Particle tracking velocimetry in three-dimensional flows, Exp. Fluids, 15(2),
133-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223406, 1993.

765 Montgomery, D. R. and Buffington, J. M.: Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins, Geol. Soc. Am. Bul., 109(5), 596-611, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0596:CRMIMD>2.3.CO;2, 1997. Morgan J. A., Brogan D. J., and Nelson P. A.: Application of structure-from-motion photogrammetry in laboratory flumes, Geomorphology, 276(1), 125-143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.10.021, 2017. Recking, A., Leduc, P., Liébault, F., and Church, M.: A field investigation of the influence of sediment supply on step-pool 770 morphology and stability. Geomorphology, 139, 53-66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.09.024, 2012. Roth, M. S., Jähnel, C., Stamm, J., and Schneider, L. K.: Turbulent eddy identification of a meander and vertical-slot fishways in numerical models applying the IPOS-framework, J. Ecohydraulics, 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2020.1869916, 2020. Saletti, M. and Hassan, M. A.: Width variations control the development of grain structuring in steep step‐pool dominated 775 streams: insight from flume experiments, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 45(6), 1430-1440, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4815, 2020. Smith, D. P., Kortman, S. R., Caudillo, A. M., Kwan‐Davis, R. L., Wandke, J. J., Klein, J. W., Gennaro, M. C. S., Bogdan, M. A., and Vannerus, P. A.: Controls on large boulder mobility in an ‘auto-naturalized’ constructed step-pool river: San Clemente Reroute and Dam Removal Project, Carmel River, California, USA, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 45(9), 1990-2003, 780 https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4860, 2020. Thappeta, S. K., Bhallamudi, S. M., Fiener, P., and Narasimhan, B.: Resistance in Steep Open Channels due to Randomly Distributed Macroroughness Elements at Large Froude Numbers, J. Hydraul. Eng., 22(12), 04017052, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001587, 2017. Thappeta, S. K., Bhallamudi, S. M., Chandra, V., Fiener, P., and Baki, A. B. M.: Energy loss in steep open channels with step785 pools, Water, 13(1), 72, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010072, 2021. Turowski, J. M., Yager, E. M., Badoux, A., Rickenmann, D., and Molnar, P.: The impact of exceptional events on erosion, bedload transport and channel stability in a step-pool channel, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 34(12), 1661-1673, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1855, 2009. Vallé, B. L. and Pasternack, G. B.: Air concentrations of submerged and unsubmerged hydraulic jumps in a bedrock step‐pool 790 channel, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 111(F3), F03016. https://doi:10.1029/2004JF000140, 2006. Waldon, M. G.: Estimation of average stream velocity, J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(11), 1119-1122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:11(1119), 2004. Wang, Z., Melching, C., Duan, X., and Yu, G.: Ecological and hydraulic studies of step-pool systems, J. Hydraul. Eng., 135(9), 705-717, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2009)135:9(705), 2009

795 Wang, Z., Qi, L., and Wang, X.: A prototype experiment of debris flow control with energy dissipation structures, Nat. Hazards, 60(3), 971-989, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9878-5, 2012. Weichert, R. B.: Bed Morphology and Stability in Steep Open Channels, Ph.D. Dissertation, No. 16316. ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 247pp., 2005. Wilcox, A. C., Wohl, E. E., Comiti, F., and Mao, L.: Hydraulics, morphology, and energy dissipation in an alpine step‐pool 800 channel, Water Resour. Res., 47(7), W07514, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010192, 2011. Wohl, E. E. and Thompson, D. M.: Velocity characteristics along a small step–pool channel. Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 25(4), 353-367, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(200004)25:4<353::AID-ESP59>3.0.CO;2-5, 2000. Wu, S. and Rajaratnam, N.: Impinging jet and surface flow regimes at drop. J. Hydraul. Res., 36(1), 69-74, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498378, 1998. 805 Xu, Y. and Liu, X.: 3D computational modeling of stream flow resistance due to large woody debris, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, St. Louis, USA, 11-14, Jul, 2346-2353, 2016. Xu, Y. and Liu, X.: Effects of different in-stream structure representations in computational fluid dynamics models—Taking engineered log jams (ELJ) as an example, Water, 9(2), 110, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020110, 2017. Zeng, Y. X., Ismail, H., and Liu, X.: Flow Decomposition Method Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics for Rock Weir 810 Head-Discharge Relationship. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 147(8), 04021030, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943- 4774.0001584, 2021. Zhang, C., Wang, Z., and Li, Z.: A physically-based model of individual step-pool stability in mountain streams, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on River Sedimentation, Stuttgart, Germany, 801-809, 2016. Zhang, C., Xu, M., Hassan, M. A., Chartrand, S. M., and Wang, Z.: Experimental study on the stability and failure of individual 815 step-pool, Geomorphology, 311, 51-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.023, 2018. Zhang, C., Xu, M., Hassan, M. A., Chartrand, S. M., Wang, Z., and Ma, Z.: Experiment on morphological and hydraulic adjustments of step‐pool unit to flow increase, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 45(2), 280-294, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4722, 2020. Zimmermann A., E.: Flow resistance in steep streams: An experimental study, Water Resour. Res., 46, W09536, 820 https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007913, 2010. Zimmermann A. E., Salleti M., Zhang C., Hassan M. A.: Step-pool Channel Features, in: Treatise on Geomorphology (2nd Edition), vol. 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, edited by: Shroder, J. (Editor in Chief), Wohl, E. (Ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818234-5.00004-3, 2020.

PDF 원문보기
그림 1 하천횡단구조물 하류부 횡단구조물 파괴

유입조건에 따른압력변이로 인한하천횡단구조물 하류물받이공 및 바닥보호공설계인자 도출최종보고서

주관연구기관 / 홍익대학교 산학협력단
공동연구기관 / 한국건설기술연구원
공동연구기관 / 주식회사 지티이

연구의 목적 및 내용

하천횡단구조물이 하천설계기준(2009)대로 설계되었음에도 불구하고, 하류부에서 물받이공 및 바닥보호공의 피해가 발생하여, 구조물 본체에 대한 안전성이 현저하 게 낮아지고 있는 실정이다. 하천설계기준이 상류부의 수리특성을 반영하였다고 하나 하류부의 수리특성인 유속의 변동 성분 또는 압력의 변동성분까지 고려하고 있지는 않다. 현재 많은 선행연구에서 이러한 난류적 특성이 구조물에 미치는 영 향에 대해 제시하고 있는 실정이며, 국내 하천에서의 피해 또한 이와 관련이 있다 고 판단된다. 이에 본 연구에서는 난류성분 특히 압력의 변동성분이 물받이공과 바닥보호공에 미치는 영향을 정량적으로 분석하여, 하천 횡단구조물의 치수 안전 성 증대에 기여하고자 한다. 물받이공과 바닥보호공에 미치는 압력의 변동성분 (pressure fluctuation) 영향을 분석하기 위해 크게 3가지로 연구내용을 분류하였 다. 첫 번째는 압력의 변동으로 순간적인 음압구배(adversed pressure gradient) 가 발생할 경우 바닥보호공의 사석 및 블록이 이탈하는 것이다. 이를 확인하기 위 해 정밀한 압력 측정장치를 통해 압력변이를 측정하여, 사석의 이탈 가능성을 검 토할 것이며, 최종적으로 이탈에 대한 한계조건을 도출할 것이다. 두 번째는 압력 의 변동이 물받이공의 진동을 유발시켜 이를 지지하고 있는 지반에 다짐효과를 가 져와 물받이공과 지반사이에 공극이 발생하는 경우이다. 이러한 공극으로 물받이 공은 자중 및 물의 압력을 받게 되어, 결국 휨에 의한 파괴가 발생할 가능성이 있 게 된다. 본 연구에서는 실험을 통하여 압력의 변동과 물받이공의 진동을 동시에 측정하여, 진동이 발생하지 않을 최소 두께를 제시할 것이다. 세 번째는 압력변이 로 인한 물받이공의 진동이 피로파괴로 연결되는 경우이다. 이 현상 또한 수리실 험을 통해 압력변이-피로파괴의 관계를 정량적으로 분석하여, 한계 조건을 제시할 것이다. 본 연구는 국내 보 및 낙차공에서 발생하는 다양한 Jet의 특성을 수리실 험으로 재현해야 하며, 이를 위해 평면 Jet 분사기(plane Jet injector)를 고안/ 제작하여, 효율적인 수리실험을 수행할 것이다. 또한 3차원 수치해석을 통해 실제 스케일에 적용함으로써 연구결과의 활용도 및 적용성을 높이고자 한다.

Keywords

압력변이, 물받이공, 바닥보호공, 난류, 진동

그림 1 하천횡단구조물 하류부 횡단구조물 파괴
그림 1 하천횡단구조물 하류부 횡단구조물 파괴
그림 2. 시간에 따른 압력의 변동 양상 및 정의
그림 2. 시간에 따른 압력의 변동 양상 및 정의
그림 3. 하천횡단구조물 하류부 도수현상시 발생하는 압력변이 분포도, Fr=8.0 상태이며, 바닥(slab)에 양압과 음압이 지속적으로 작용한다. (Fiorotto & Rinaldo, 2010)
그림 3. 하천횡단구조물 하류부 도수현상시 발생하는 압력변이 분포도, Fr=8.0 상태이며, 바닥(slab)에 양압과 음압이 지속적으로 작용한다. (Fiorotto & Rinaldo, 2010)
그림 4. 파괴 개념
그림 4. 파괴 개념
그림 6. PIV 측정 원리(www.photonics.com)
그림 6. PIV 측정 원리(www.photonics.com)
그림 7. LED회로판 및 BIV기법 기본개념
그림 7. LED회로판 및 BIV기법 기본개념
그림 8. BIV측정기법을 적용한 순간이미지 (Lin et al., 2012)
그림 8. BIV측정기법을 적용한 순간이미지 (Lin et al., 2012)
그림 9. 감세공의 분류
그림 9. 감세공의 분류
그림 17 수리실헐 수로시설: (a) 전체수로전경, (b) Weir 보를 포함한 측면도, (c) 도수조건 실험전경
그림 17 수리실헐 수로시설: (a) 전체수로전경, (b) Weir 보를 포함한 측면도, (c) 도수조건 실험전경
그림 18 수리실험 개요도
그림 18 수리실험 개요도
그림 127 난류모형별 압력 Data (측정위치는 그림 125 참조)
그림 127 난류모형별 압력 Data (측정위치는 그림 125 참조)
그림 128 RNG 모형을 이용한 수치모의 결과
그림 128 RNG 모형을 이용한 수치모의 결과
그림 129 LES 모형을 이용한 수치모의 결과
그림 129 LES 모형을 이용한 수치모의 결과
그림 130 압력 Data의 필터링
그림 130 압력 Data의 필터링
그림 134 Case 1의 흐름특성 분포도 및 그래프
그림 134 Case 1의 흐름특성 분포도 및 그래프

참고문헌

국토기술연구센터 (1998) 하상유지공의 구조설계 지침.

감사원 (2013) 감사원 결과보고서- 4대강살리기 사업 주요시설물 품질 밑 수질관리 실태.

국토해양부 (2009) 전국 하천횡단 구조물 설치현황 및 어도 실태조사 보고서. 국토해양부 (2010). 낙동강 살리기 사업 24공구(성주칠곡지구) 실시설계보고서.

국토해양부 (2012) 보도자료-준공대비 점검결과, 4대강 보 안전 재확인.

국토해양부 (2012) 국가 및 지방하천 종합정비 마스터플랜.

국토교통성 (2008) 하천사방기술기준.

농림부 (1996). 농업생산기반정비사업계획 설계기준. 류권규(역자) (2009). 난류의 수치모의(원저자 : 梶島岳夫, 1999).

류권규, 마리안 머스테, 로버트 에테마, 윤병만 (2006). “난류 중 부유사의 속도 지체 측정.” 한국수자원학회논문집, 제39권, 제2호, pp.99-108.

배재현, 이경훈, 신종근, 양용수, 이주희 (2011). “입자영상유속계를 이용한 은어의 유영능력 측정.” 제47권, 제4호, pp.411-418.

우효섭 (2001). 하천수리학. 청문각.

한국수자원학회 (2009). 하천설계기준해설.

한국건설기술연구원 (2014) 입자영상유속계(PIV)를 이용한 하천구조물 주변 유동해석 기법 개발

한국건설기술연구원 (2017) 보와 하상유지공의 안전성 확보를 위한 물받이와 바닥보호공의 성능평가
기법에 대한 원천기술개발

국토기술연구센터 (1998) 하상유지공의 구조설계 지침.

감사원 (2013) 감사원 결과보고서- 4대강살리기 사업 주요시설물 품질 밑 수질관리 실태. 국토해양부 (2009) 전국 하천횡단 구조물 설치현황 및 어도 실태조사 보고서.

국토해양부 (2012) 보도자료-준공대비 점검결과, 4대강 보 안전 재확인. 국토해양부 (2012) 국가 및 지방하천 종합정비 마스터플랜.

국토교통성 (2008) 하천사방기술기준.

농림부 (1996). 농업생산기반정비사업계획 설계기

류권규(역자) (2009). 난류의 수치모의(원저자 : 梶島岳夫, 1999).
류권규, 마리안 머스테, 로버트 에테마, 윤병만 (2006). “난류 중 부유사의 속도 지체 측정.” 한국수자원학회논문집, 제39권, 제2호, pp.99-108.
배재현, 이경훈, 신종근, 양용수, 이주희 (2011). “입자영상유속계를 이용한 은어의 유영능력 측정.” 제47권, 제4호, pp.411-418.
우효섭 (2001). 하천수리학. 청문각. 한국수자원학회 (2009). 하천설계기준해설. 한국건설기술연구원 (2014) 입자영상유속계(PIV)를 이용한 하천구조물 주변 유동해석 기법 개발
한국건설기술연구원 (2017) 보와 하상유지공의 안전성 확보를 위한 물받이와 바닥보호공의 성능평가
기법에 대한 원천기술개발

Adrian, R. J., Meinhart, C. D., & Tomkins, C. D. (2000). Vortex organization in the outer
region of the turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 422, 1-54.
Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954). A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American
statistical association, 49(268), 765-769.
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate
bankruptcy. The journal of finance, 23(4), 589-609.
Barjastehmaleki, S., Fiorotto, V., & Caroni, E. (2016). Spillway stilling basins lining design
via Taylor hypothesis. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 142(6), 04016010.
Beheshti, M. R., Khosrojerdi, A., & Borghei, S. M. (2013). Experimental study of air-water
turbulent flow structures on stepped spillways. International Journal of Physical Sciences,
8(25), 1362-1370.
Bligh, W. G. (1910). Dams, barrages and weirs on porous foundations. Engineering News, 64(26),
708-710.
Bowers, C. E., &Tsai, F. Y. (1969). Fluctuating pressure in spillway stilling basins. Journal
of the Hydraulics Division, 95(6), 2071-2080.
Brater, E. F., King, H. W., Lindell, J. E., & Wei, C. Y. (1976). Handbook of hydraulics for
the solution of hydraulic engineering problems (Vol. 7). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Castillo, L. G., Carrillo, J. M., & Sordo-Ward, Á. (2014). Simulation of overflow nappe
impingement jets. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16(4), 922-940

Lin, C., Hsieh, S. C., Lin, I. J., Chang, K. A., & Raikar, R. V. (2012). Flow property and
self-similarity in steady hydraulic jumps. Experiments in Fluids, 53(5), 1591-1616

Chanson, H. (1999). The Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow: An Introduction. Physical Modelling
of Hydraulics.
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-Channel Hydraulics, McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.
Christensen, B. A. (1984). “Analysis of Partially Filled Circular Storm Sewers.” J. of
Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 8.
El-Ragaby, A., El-Salakawy, E., and Benmokrane, B., “Fatigue Life Evaluation of Concrete
Bridge Deck Slabs Reinforced with Glass FRP Composite Bars,” Journal of Composites for
Construction, ASCE, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007, pp. 258-268. (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)
1090-0268(2007)11:3(258),
Fiorotto, V., & Rinaldo, A. (1992). Turbulent pressure fluctuations under hydraulic jumps.
Journal of Hydraulic Research, 30(4), 499-520.
Flow Science (2015). FLOW-3D User Manual(Release 11.1.0), Los Alamos, New Mexico.
González-Betancourt, M. (2016). Uplift force and momenta on a slab subjected to hydraulic
jump. Dyna, 83(199), 124-133.
Grinstein, L., & Lipsey, S. I. (2001). Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Routledge.
Grubbs, F. E., & Beck, G. (1972). Extension of sample sizes and percentage points for
significance tests of outlying observations. Technometrics, 14(4), 847-854.
Gylltoft K. (1983): Fracture mechanics models for fatigue in concrete structures. Doctoral
thesis / Tekniska högskolan i Luleå, 25D, Luleå, 210 pp.
Herlina, H. and Jirka, G. H. (2008). “Experiments on gas transfer near the air-water
interface in a grid-stirred tank.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 594, pp.183-208.
IACWD (Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data). (1982). Guidelines for determining flood
flow frequency. Bulletin 17B.
JIRKA, G. H. (2008). Experiments on gas transfer at the air–water interface induced by
oscillating grid turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 594, 183-208.
Kadota, A., Suzuki, K., Rummel, A. C., Weitbrecht, V., & Jirka, G. H. (2007). Shallow flow
visualization around a single groyne. In Proc. of 7th International Symposium of Particle
Image Velocimetry (CD-ROM).
Kazemi, F., Khodashenas, S. R., & Sarkardeh, H. (2016). Experimental study of pressure
fluctuation in stilling basins. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(1), 13-21.
Klowak, C., Memon, A., and Mufti, A., “Static and fatigue investigation of second generation
steel-free bridge decks,” Cement & Concrete Composites, ScienceDirect, Elsevier, Vol. 28, No.

10, 2006, pp. 890-897. (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.019),
Koca, K., Noss, C., Anlanger, C., Brand, A., & Lorke, A. (2017). Performance of the Vectrino
Profiler at the sediment–water interface. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 55(4), 573-581.
Kolmogorov, A. (1933). Sulla determinazione empirica di una lgge di distribuzione. Inst. Ital.
Attuari, Giorn., 4, 83-91.
Leon, A., & Alnahit, A. (2016). A Remotely Controlled Siphon System for Dynamic Water Storage
Management.
Lin, C., Hsieh, S., Chang, K. and Raikar, R. (2012). “Flow property and self-similarity in
steady hydraulic jumps.” Experiments in Fluid, 53, pp. 1591-1616.
Lopardo, R., Fattor, C. A., Casado, J. M. and Lopardo, M. C. (2004). “Aspects of vibration
and fatigue of materials related to coherent structures of macroturbulent flows”
International Conference on Hydraulic of Dams and River Structures.
Lopardo, R. A., & Romagnoli, M. (2009). Pressure and velocity fluctuations in stilling basins.
In Advances in Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (pp. 2093-2098). Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg.
Sanchez, P. A., Ramirez, G. E., Vergara, R., & Minguillo, F. (1973). Performance of
Sulfur-Coated Urea Under Intermittently Flooded Rice Culture in Peru 1. Soil Science Society
of America Journal, 37(5), 789-792.
Matsui, S., Tokai, D., Higashiyama, H., and Mizukoshi, M., “Fatigue Durability of Fiber
Reinforced Concrete Decks Under Running Wheel Load,” Proceedings 3rd International Conference
on Concrete Under Severe Conditions, Ed. N. Banthia, Vancouver, Canada, 2001, pp. 982-991.,
Mohammadi, S. F., Galgoul, N. S., Starossek, U., & Videiro, P. M. (2016). An efficient time
domain fatigue analysis and its comparison to spectral fatigue assessment for an offshore
jacket structure. Marine Structures, 49, 97-115.
Pothof, I. (2011). Co-current air-water flow in downward sloping pipes. Stichting Deltares
Pothof, I. W. M., & Clemens, F. H. L. R. (2011). Experimental study of air–water flow in
downward sloping pipes. International journal of multiphase flow, 37(3), 278-292.
Ryu, Y., Chang, K. A., & Lim, H. J. (2005). Use of bubble image velocimetry for measurement of
plunging wave impinging on structure and associated greenwater. Measurement Science and
Technology, 16(10), 1945.
Sanjou, M., & Nezu, I. (2009). Turbulence structure and coherent motion in meandering compound
open-channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 47(5), 598-610.
Sargison, J. E., & Percy, A. (2009). Hydraulics of broad-crested weirs with varying side
slopes. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 135(1), 115-118.

Sobani, A. (2014). Pressure fluctuations on the slabs of stilling basins under hydraulic jump.
Song, Y., Chang, K, Ryu, Y. and Kwon, S. (2013). “ Experimental study on flow kinematics and
impact pressure in liquid sloshing.”, Experiments in Fluid, 54, pp. 1592.
Stagonas, D., Lara, J. L., Losada, I. J., Higuera, P., Jaime, F. F., & Muller, G. (2014).
Large scale measurements of wave loads and mapping of impact pressure distribution at the
underside of wave recurves. In Proceedings of the HYDRALAB IV Joint User Meeting.
Toso, J. W., & Bowers, C. E. (1988). Extreme pressures in hydraulic-jump stilling basins.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 114(8), 829-843.
Youn, S. G. and Chang, S. P., “Behavior of Composite Bridge Decks Subjected to Static and
Fatigue Loading,” Structural Journal, ACI Technical paper, Title No. 95-S23, 1998, pp.
249-258. (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14359/543),

원본 보기
Figure 10 | Contour lines of the static pressure (Pa) for the standard form of the stepped spillway with discharge of 60 liters/second.

스키밍 흐름 영역에서 계단형 여수로의 수리 성능에 대한 삼각형 프리즘 요소의 영향: 실험 연구 및 수치 모델링

The effect of triangular prismatic elements on the hydraulic performance of stepped spillways in the skimming flow regime: an experimental study and numerical modeling 

Kiyoumars Roushangar; Samira Akhgar; Saman Shahnazi

계단식 여수로는 댐의 여수로 위로 흐르는 큰 물의 에너지를 분산시키는 비용 효율적인 유압 구조입니다. 이 연구에서는 삼각주형 요소(TPE)가 계단식 배수로의 수력 성능에 미치는 영향에 초점을 맞췄습니다. 9개의 계단식 배수로 모델이 TPE의 다양한 모양과 레이아웃으로 실험 및 수치적으로 조사되었습니다. 적절한 난류 모델을 채택하려면 RNG k – ε 및 표준 k – ε모델을 활용했습니다. 계산 모델 결과는 계단 표면의 속도 분포 및 압력 프로파일을 포함하여 실험 사례의 계단 여수로에 대한 복잡한 흐름을 만족스럽게 시뮬레이션했습니다. 결과는 계단식 여수로에 TPE를 설치하는 것이 캐비테이션 효과를 줄이는 효과적인 방법이 될 수 있음을 나타냅니다. 계단식 여수로에 TPE를 설치하면 에너지 소실률이 최대 54% 증가했습니다. 계단식 배수로의 성능은 TPE가 더 가깝게 배치되었을 때 개선되었습니다. 또한, 실험 데이터를 이용하여 거칠기 계수( f )와 임계 깊이 대 단차 거칠기( yc / k )의 비율 사이의 관계를 높은 정확도로 얻었다.

Keywords

energy dissipation, Flow-3D, roughness coefficient, stepped spillway, triangular prismatic elements

에너지 소산 , Flow-3D , 거칠기 계수 , 계단식 배수로 , 삼각형 프리즘 요소

Figure 1 | General schematics of laboratory flume facilities.
Figure 1 | General schematics of laboratory flume facilities.
Figure 2 | Different layouts of the selected TPE in the experimental study (y1 and y2 are initial, and sequent depths of hydraulic jump).
Figure 2 | Different layouts of the selected TPE in the experimental study (y1 and y2 are initial, and sequent depths of hydraulic jump).
Figure 3 | Geometry and alignment of TPE in the numerical study.
Figure 3 | Geometry and alignment of TPE in the numerical study.
Figure 5 | Comparison of turbulence models in Flow-3D.
Figure 5 | Comparison of turbulence models in Flow-3D.
Figure 6 | Sequent water depths versus unit flow rate in standard stepped spillways and stepped spillways with triangular TPEs of types A and B.
Figure 6 | Sequent water depths versus unit flow rate in standard stepped spillways and stepped spillways with triangular TPEs of types A and B.
Figure 7 | Energy dissipation for the standard stepped spillway and the stepped spillway with TPEs.
Figure 7 | Energy dissipation for the standard stepped spillway and the stepped spillway with TPEs.
Figure 8 | Positions of measurement points to investigate the pressure and velocity distributions on the stepped spillway
Figure 8 | Positions of measurement points to investigate the pressure and velocity distributions on the stepped spillway
Figure 9 | Velocity distributions on the vertical surface of step number 4.
Figure 9 | Velocity distributions on the vertical surface of step number 4.
Figure 10 | Contour lines of the static pressure (Pa) for the standard form of the stepped spillway with discharge of 60 liters/second.
Figure 10 | Contour lines of the static pressure (Pa) for the standard form of the stepped spillway with discharge of 60 liters/second.
Figure 11 | Pressure distribution on the vertical surface of the fourth step.
Figure 11 | Pressure distribution on the vertical surface of the fourth step.
Figure 12 | Horizontal profile of the pressure distribution on the floor of step 4.
Figure 12 | Horizontal profile of the pressure distribution on the floor of step 4.
Figure 13 | Roughness coefficient changes with various unit discharges for stepped spillways.
Figure 13 | Roughness coefficient changes with various unit discharges for stepped spillways.
Figure 14 | Variations of sequent depth of downstream with various unit discharges for stepped spillways.
Figure 14 | Variations of sequent depth of downstream with various unit discharges for stepped spillways.
Figure 15 | Energy dissipation rate changes with various unit discharges for different stepped spillways.
Figure 15 | Energy dissipation rate changes with various unit discharges for different stepped spillways.
Figure 16 | Roughness coefficients (f ) versus the critical depth to the step roughness ratio (yc/K).
Figure 16 | Roughness coefficients (f ) versus the critical depth to the step roughness ratio (yc/K).

REFERENCES

Abbasi, S. & Kamanbedast, A. A. 2012 Investigation of effect of changes in dimension and hydraulic of stepped spillways for maximization
energy dissipation. World Applied Sciences Journal 18 (2), 261–267.
Arjenaki, M. O. & Sanayei, H. R. Z. 2020 Numerical investigation of energy dissipation rate in stepped spillways with lateral slopes using
experimental model development approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 1–12.
Attarian, A., Hosseini, K., Abdi, H. & Hosseini, M. 2014 The effect of the step height on energy dissipation in stepped spillways using
numerical simulation. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 39 (4), 2587–2594.
Azhdary Moghaddam, M. 1997 The Hydraulics of Flow on Stepped Ogee-Profile Spillways. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Ottawa,
Canada.
Bakhtyar, R. & Barry, D. A. 2009 Optimization of cascade stilling basins using GA and PSO approaches. Journal of Hydroinformatics 11 (2),
119–132.
Barani, G. A., Rahnama, M. B. & Sohrabipoor, N. 2005 Investigation of flow energy dissipation over different stepped spillways. American
Journal of Applied Sciences 2 (6), 1101–1105.
Boes, R. M. & Hager, W. H. 2003 Hydraulic design of stepped spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129 (9), 671–679.
Chamani, M. R. & Rajaratnam, N. 1994 Jet flow on stepped spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 120 (2), 254–259.
Chanson, H. 1994 Comparison of energy dissipation between nappe and skimming flow regimes on stepped chutes. Journal of Hydraulic
Research 32 (2), 213–218.
Felder, S., Guenther, P. & Chanson, H. 2012 Air-Water Flow Properties and Energy Dissipation on Stepped Spillways: A Physical Study of
Several Pooled Stepped Configurations. No. CH87/12. School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland.
Harlow, F. H. & Nakayama, P. I. 1968 Transport of Turbulence Energy Decay Rate. No. LA-3854. Los Alamos Scientific Lab, N. Mex.
Hekmatzadeh, A. A., Papari, S. & Amiri, S. M. 2018 Investigation of energy dissipation on various configurations of stepped spillways
considering several RANS turbulence models. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 42 (2),
97–109.
Henderson, F. M. 1966 Open Channel Flow. MacMillan Company, New York.
Kavian Pour, M. R. & Masoumi, H. R. 2008 New approach for estimating of energy dissipation over stepped spillways. International Journal
of Civil Engineering 6 (3), 230–237.
Li, S., Li, Q. & Yang, J. 2019 CFD modelling of a stepped spillway with various step layouts. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.
Li, S., Yang, J. & Li, Q. 2020 Numerical modelling of air-water flows over a stepped spillway with chamfers and cavity blockages. KSCE
Journal of Civil Engineering 24 (1), 99–109.
Moghadam, M. K., Amini, A. & Moghadam, E. K. 2020 Numerical study of energy dissipation and block barriers in stepped spillways. Journal
of Hydroinformatics.
Morovati, K., Eghbalzadeh, A. & Javan, M. 2016 Numerical investigation of the configuration of the pools on the flow pattern passing over
pooled stepped spillway in skimming flow regime. Acta Mechanic Journal 227, 353–366.
Parsaie, A. & Haghiabi, A. H. 2019 The hydraulic investigation of circular crested stepped spillway. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
70, 101624.
Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Yuan, H., Li, X., Xie, C., Yang, S. & Bai, Z. 2019 Energy dissipation in stepped spillways with different horizontal face
angles. Energies 12 (23), 4469.
Roushangar, K., Foroudi, A. & Saneie, M. 2019 Influential parameters on submerged discharge capacity of converging ogee spillways based
on experimental study and machine learning-based modeling. Journal of Hydroinformatics 21 (3), 474–492.
Sarkardeh, H., Marosi, M. & Roshan, R. 2015 Stepped spillway optimization through numerical and physical modeling. International Journal
of Energy and Environment 6 (6), 597.
Shahheydari, H., Nodoshan, E. J., Barati, R. & Moghadam, M. A. 2015 Discharge coefficient and energy dissipation over stepped spillway
under skimming flow regime. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 19 (4), 1174–1182.
Tabari, M. M. R. & Tavakoli, S. 2016 Effects of stepped spillway geometry on flow pattern and energy dissipation. Arabian Journal for Science
and Engineering 41 (4), 1215–1224.
Toombes, L. & Chanson, H. 2000 Air-water flow and gas transfer at aeration cascades: a comparative study of smooth and stepped chutes. In
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Hydraulics of Stepped Spillways, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 22–24.
Torabi, H., Parsaie, A., Yonesi, H. & Mozafari, E. 2018 Energy dissipation on rough stepped spillways. Iranian Journal of Science and
Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 42 (3), 325–330.
Wüthrich, D. & Chanson, H. 2014 Hydraulics, air entrainment, and energy dissipation on a Gabion stepped weir. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering 140 (9), 04014046.
Yakhot, V. & Orszag, S. A. 1986 Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. Journal of Scientific Computing 1 (1), 3–51.
Yakhot, V. & Smith, L. M. 1992 The renormalization group, the ɛ-expansion and derivation of turbulence models. Journal of Scientific
Computing 7 (1), 35–61.

PDF Download
Figura 1. Parámetros del medidor Palmer-Bowlus

Three-Dimensional Numerical Modeling of the Palmer-Bowlus Measuring Flume Applying the FLOW-3D Software.

TOAPAXI-ALVAREZ*, Jorge; SILA-BASTIDA, Roberto    TORRES-JACOBOWITZ, Cristina.

The Palmer-Bowlus flume was developed in 1936, as an adaptation of the Venturi flume for the use in sewer systems, due to the difficulty in modifying the pipe invert. There are commercially available single-body Palmer-Bowlus flume with their respective discharge curves, which increase the cost of sewer projects. Based on the physical model of the Palmer-Bowlus flume (Torres & Vásquez, 2010), the aim of this research was to carry out the three-dimensional numerical modeling of these flow meters, considering four pipe diameters: 160 mm, 200 mm, 250 mm and 400 mm; the selected diameters are the most used ones, according to the information provided by the Empresa Pública Metropolitana de Agua Potable y Saneamiento de Quito (EPMAPS). The discharge curves were calibrated and validated using the FLOW-3D program. Meshing had a great influence on the quality results and duration of the numerical simulation; in contrast, the roughness and turbulence models (RNG y k-e) had little influence. The discharge curves obtained in the numerical modeling have good approximation to those obtained in the physical model.

Palmer-Bowlus 수로는 1936년에 하수도 시스템에 사용하기 위해 Venturi 수로를 개조한 것으로 파이프 인버트를 수정하는 것이 어렵기 때문에 개발되었습니다. 각각의 배출 곡선이 있는 시판되는 단일 몸체 Palmer-Bowlus 수로가 있으며, 이는 하수도 프로젝트 비용을 증가시킵니다.

Palmer-Bowlus 수로의 물리적 모델을 기반으로(Torres & Vásquez, 2010), 이 연구의 목적은 160mm, 200mm, 4개의 파이프 직경을 고려하여 이러한 유량계의 3차원 수치 모델링을 수행하는 것이었습니다. 250mm 및 400mm; Empresa Pública Metropolitana de Agua Potable y Sanaeamiento de Quito(EPMAPS)에서 제공한 정보에 따르면 선택한 지름이 가장 많이 사용되는 지름입니다.

방전 곡선은 FLOW-3D 프로그램을 사용하여 보정 및 검증되었습니다. 메싱은 수치 시뮬레이션의 품질 결과와 기간에 큰 영향을 미쳤습니다. 대조적으로, 거칠기 및 난류 모델(RNG y k-e)은 거의 영향을 미치지 않았습니다. 수치 모델링에서 얻은 방전 곡선은 물리적 모델에서 얻은 것과 유사합니다.

Figura 1. Parámetros del medidor Palmer-Bowlus
Figura 1. Parámetros del medidor Palmer-Bowlus
Figura 2. Diagrama de flujo de la modelación del medidor Palmer-Bowlus en FLOW-3D
Figura 2. Diagrama de flujo de la modelación del medidor Palmer-Bowlus en FLOW-3D
Figura 3. Captura de pantalla del modelo numérico Q=22.047( 𝑙 𝑠 ), Ho=20.038 cm
Figura 3. Captura de pantalla del modelo numérico Q=22.047( 𝑙 𝑠 ), Ho=20.038 cm

REFERENCIAS

Aulestia, C. (2017). Modelación numérica en tres dimensiones de flujo en
las compuertas de la captación del Proyecto Toachi – Pilatón
aplicando dinámica de fluidos computacional (CFD). [Tesis
Maestría]. Quito, Ecuador: Escuela Politécnica Nacional.
Casa, E. (2016). Modelación numérica del flujo rasante en una rápida
escalonada aplicando la dinámica de fluidos computacional
(CFD) Programa FLOW-3D. [Tesis maestría]. Quito, Ecuador:
Escuela Politécnica Nacional.
Chow, V. T. (2004). Hidráulica de canales abiertos (Primera ed.). (J.
Saldarriaga, Trad.) Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia: McGrawHill.
Domínguez, F. (1999). Hidráulica (Sexta Edición ed.). Santiango de Chile,
Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Fernández, J. (2012). Introducción a la dinámica de fluidos computacional
(CFD) por el método de volúmenes finitos. Barcelona: Editorial
Reverté, S.A.
Flow Science, Inc. (2016). Flow-3D v11.2 Documentation. Flow Science,
Inc. Santa Fe: Flow Science.
Ludwig, J., & Ludwig, R. (1951). Design of Palmer-Bowlus Flumes.
Sewafe and Insdustrial Wastes, 23(9), 1096-1107. Obtenido de
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25031687
Recasens, J. (2014). Modelación tridimensional del glujo de entrada en un
sumidero. Barcelona: UPC BARCELONATECH.
Sotelo, G. (1997). Hidráulica General Vol. 1. México D.F.: LIMUSA S.A.
Torres, C., & Vásquez, E. (2010). Análisis de medidores de caudal para
flujo subcrítico en sistemas de alcantarillado. [Tesis
ingeniería]. Quito, Ecuador: Escuela Politécnica Nacional.
Versteeg, H. K., & Malalasekera, W. (1995). An Introduction to
computational fluid dynamics – The finite volume method. New
York: John Wiley & Sons.

PDF Download
Figure 1 | Original Compound Broad Crested Weir Model (PVC cast).

복합 광대보의 방류계수 예측을 위한 실험적 해석과 CFD 해석의 비교연구

Comparative study of experimental and CFD analysis for predicting discharge coefficient of compound broad crested weir

ABSTRACT

Present study highlights the behavior of weir crest head and width parameter on the discharge coefficient of compound broad crested (CBC) weir. Computational fluid dynamics model (CFD) is validated with laboratory experimental investigations.

In the discharge analysis through broad crested weirs, the upstream head over the weir crest (h) is crucial, where the result is mainly dependent upon the weir crest length (L) in transverse direction to flow, water depth from channel bed. Currently, minimal investigations are known for CFD validations on compound broad crested weirs.

The hydraulic research for measuring discharge numerically is carried out using FLOW 3D software. The model applies renormalized group (RNG) using volume of fluid (VOF) method for improved accuracy in free surface simulations. Structured hexagonal meshes of cubic elements define discretized meshing.

The comparative analysis of the numerical simulations and experimental observations confirm the performance of CBC weir for precise measurement of a wide range of discharges. Series of CFD model studies and experimental validation have led to constant range of discharg coefficients for various head over weir crest. The correlation coefficient of discharge predictions is 0.999 with mean error of 0.28%.

현재 연구에서는 CBC(compound broad crested) 위어의 배출 계수에 대한 위어 볏 머리 및 너비 매개변수의 거동을 강조합니다. 전산 유체 역학 모델(CFD)은 실험실 실험 조사를 통해 검증되었습니다.

넓은 볏이 있는 둑을 통한 유출 분석에서 둑 마루의 상류 수두(h)가 중요합니다. 여기서 결과는 주로 흐름에 대한 횡 방향의 둑 마루 길이(L), 수로 바닥에서 수심에 따라 달라집니다. . 현재 복합 넓은 볏 둑에 대한 CFD 검증에 대해 최소한의 조사가 알려져 있습니다.

수압 연구는 FLOW 3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 수치적으로 측정합니다. 이 모델은 자유 표면 시뮬레이션의 정확도 향상을 위해 VOF(유체 체적) 방법을 사용하여 RNG(재정규화 그룹)를 적용합니다. 정육면체 요소의 구조화된 육각형 메쉬는 이산화된 메쉬를 정의합니다.

수치 시뮬레이션과 실험적 관찰의 비교 분석을 통해 광범위한 배출의 정확한 측정을 위한 CBC 둑의 성능을 확인했습니다. 일련의 CFD 모델 연구와 실험적 검증을 통해 다양한 head over weir crest에 대한 일정한 범위의 방전 계수가 나타났습니다. 방전 예측의 상관 계수는 0.999이고 평균 오차는 0.28%입니다.

Figure 1 | Original Compound Broad Crested Weir Model (PVC cast).
Figure 1 | Original Compound Broad Crested Weir Model (PVC cast).
Figure 4 | CFD Simulation for max discharge (y2 ¼ 13.557 cm, Qmax ¼ 10 lps) and min discharge (y2 ¼ 6.56 cm, Qmin ¼ 2 lps).
Figure 4 | CFD Simulation for max discharge (y2 ¼ 13.557 cm, Qmax ¼ 10 lps) and min discharge (y2 ¼ 6.56 cm, Qmin ¼ 2 lps).
Figure 5 | (a, b) Velocity profiles corresponding to max discharge (10 lps) and min discharge (2 lps).
Figure 5 | (a, b) Velocity profiles corresponding to max discharge (10 lps) and min discharge (2 lps).
Table 8 | Range of Froude number, Reynold number and Weber number
Table 8 | Range of Froude number, Reynold number and Weber number

Key words

compound weir, flow 3D, flow measurement, numerical technique, open channel

HIGHLIGHTS

• The Head-Discharge relation is established for discharge measurement using compound broad crested weir, experimentally and numerically.
• Assessment of head over weir crest for different step widths of proposed weir on discharge coefficient is executed.
• Experimental and CFD results of weir performance demonstrate good agreement between the theoretical discharges by traditional rectangular weir formulae keeping Cd constant.

CONCLUSION

  1. The head discharge relationship established for compound rectangular broad crested weir for various discharge ranges was validated by CFD technique. A three dimensional simulation software FLOW 3D was used for this purpose.
  2. Original theoretical compound weir model depicts the relative average error between discharge predictions with Flow 3D simulation as 4.96% which is found less than the predictions made by graphical interpolation technique which is 5.33%.
  3. The standard deviation in Cd parameter for CFD simulation model is less i.e. 0.0146 as compared to experimental output of 0.0502.
  4. The correlation coefficient for physical and CFD studies for modified compound weir model is high, around 0.999 with
    error in discharge predictions being 0.28% as compared to the accuracy limits of about +3–5% stated in literature so far.
  5. Discharge coefficient by experimental and CFD approach is maintained constant and equal to design input value of 0.6.
    Thus, the proposed CBC weir can be operated for various discharge ranges by maintaining constant discharge coefficients.
    Good agreement between the theoretical, experimental and CFD simulation results for obtaining discharge through compound broad crested weir ascertains the fact that CFD model can be used as an effective tool towards modeling flow through compound broad crested weir.

REFERENCES

Abd El-Hady Rady, R. M. 2011 2D 3D modeling of flow over sharp crested weirs. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 7 (12), 2495–2505.
ISSN 1819-544X.
Ackers, P., White, W. R. & Harrison, A. J. M. 1978 Weirs and Flumes for Flow Measurement. Wiley, New York.
Aydin, M. C. 2016 Investigation of a sill effect on rectangular side-weir flow by using CFD. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
142 (2), 04015043.
Azimi, A. H. & Rajaratnam, N. 2009 Discharge characteristics of weirs of finite crest length. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 135 (12),
1081–1085.
Bijankhan, M., Di Stefano, C., Ferro, V. & Kouchakzadeh, S. 2014 New stage discharge relationship for weirs of finite crest length. Journal of
Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 140 (3), 06013006.
Boiten, W. & Pitlo, H. R. 1982 The V- shaped broad-crested weir. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 108 (2), 142–160.
Bos, M. G. 1989 Discharge Measurement Structures, 3rd edn. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Publication 20,
Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Gogus, M., Defne, Z. & Ozkandemir, V. 2006 Broad-crested weirs with rectangular compound cross sections. Journal of Irrigation and
Drainage Engineering 132 (3), 272–280.

Gogus, M., Al-Khatib, I. A., Atalay, A. E. & Khatib, J. I. 2016 Discharge prediction in flow measurement flumes with different downstream
transition slopes. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 47, 28–34.
Hager, W. H. & Schwalt, M. 1994 Broad – crested weir. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 120 (1), 13–25.
Harrison, A. J. M. 1967 The streamlined broad-crested weir. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 38, 657–678.
Hinge, G. A., Balkrishna, S. & Khare, K. C. 2010 Improved design of stilling basin for deficient tail water. Journal of Basic and Applied
Scientific Research 1 (1), 31–40.
Hinge, G. A., Balkrishna, S. & Khare, K. C. 2011 Experimental and numerical study of compound broad crested weir. International Journal of
Fluids Engineering 3 (2), 197–202.
Horton, R. E. 1907 Weir Experiments, Coefficients, and Formulas. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Supply and Irrigation
Paper 200. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Khan, L. A., Wicklein, E. A. & Teixeira, E. C. 2006 Validation of a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model of a contact tank.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 132 (7), 741–746.
Kindsvater, C. E. & Carter, R. W. 1959 Discharge characteristics of rectangular thin-plate weirs. Paper No. 3001, Transactions, American
Society of Civil Engineers 124.
Kulin, G. & Compton, P. R. 1975 A Guide to Methods and Standards for the Measurement of Water Flow. Special Publication 421, National
Bureau of Standards.
Kulkarni, K. H. & Hinge, G. A. 2017 Compound broad crested weir for measurement of discharge – a novel approach. In: Proceedings
International Conference Organized by Indian Society of Hydraulics – ISH HYDRO, 21–23 Dec 2017, India, pp. 678–687.
Kulkarni, K. H. & Hinge, G. A. 2020 Experimental study for measuring discharge through compound broad crested weir. Flow Measurement
Instrumentation 75, 101803. ISSN 0955-5986.
Man, C., Zhang, G., Hong, V., Zhou, S. & Feng, Y. 2019 Assessment of turbulence models on bridge-pier scour using flow-3D. World Journal
of Engineering and Technology 7, 241–255. ISSN Online: 2331-4249.
Omer, B., Cihan, A. M., Emin, E. M. & Miller, C. J. 2018 Experimental and CFD analysis of circular labyrinth weirs. Journal of Irrigation and
Drainage Engineering 144 (6), 04018007.
RangaRaju, K. G. 1981 Flow Through Open Channels. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Roushangar, K., Nouri, A., Shahnazi, S. & Azamathulla, H. M. 2021 Towards design of compound channels with minimum overall cost
through grey wolf optimization algorithm. IWA – Journal of Hydroinformatics (In – press).
Safarzadeh, A. & Mohajeri, S. H. 2018 Hydrodynamics of rectangular broad-crested porous weir. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
Engineering 144 (10), 04018028.
Salmasi, F., Poorescandar, S., Dalir, A. H. & Zadeh, D. F. 2012 Discharge relations for rectangular broad crested weirs. Journal of
Agricultural Sciences 17, 324–336.
Samadi, A. & Arvanaghi, H. 2014 CFD simulation of flow over contracted compound arched rectangular sharp crested weirs. International
Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering 4 (4), 549–560.
Savage, B. M. & Johnson, M. C. 2001 Flow over ogee spillway: physical and numerical model case study. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
127 (8), 640–649.
Swamee, P. K. 1988 Generalized rectangular weir equations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 945–952. doi:10.1061/(ASCE),0733-9429
114:8(945).
The United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) 2001 Water Measurement Manual, Chapter 7 – Weirs. U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC, p. 20402. Available from: http://www/usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/wmm.
Zahiri, A. & Azamathulla, H. M. 2014 Comparison between linear genetic programming and M5 tree models to predict flow discharge in
compound channels. Neural Computing and Application 24, 413–420.

PDF View
Fig. 11. Velocity vectors along x-direction through the center of the box culvert for B0, B30, B50, and B70 respectively.

Numerical investigation of scour characteristics downstream of blocked culverts

막힌 암거 하류의 세굴 특성 수치 조사

NesreenTahabMaged M.El-FekyaAtef A.El-SaiadaIsmailFathya
aDepartment of Water and Water Structures Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
bLab Manager, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt

Abstract

횡단 구조물을 통한 막힘은 안정성을 위협하는 위험한 문제 중 하나입니다. 암거의 막힘 형상 및 하류 세굴 특성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구는 거의 없습니다.

이 연구의 목적은 수면과 세굴 모두에서 상자 암거를 통한 막힘의 작용을 수치적으로 논의하는 것입니다. 이를 위해 FLOW 3D v11.1.0을 사용하여 퇴적물 수송 모델을 조사했습니다.

상자 암거를 통한 다양한 차단 비율이 연구되었습니다. FLOW 3D 모델은 실험 데이터로 보정되었습니다. 결과는 FLOW 3D 프로그램이 세굴 다운스트림 상자 암거를 정확하게 시뮬레이션할 수 있음을 나타냅니다.

막힌 경우에 대한 속도 분포, 최대 세굴 깊이 및 수심을 플롯하고 비차단된 사례(기본 사례)와 비교했습니다.

그 결과 암거 높이의 70% 차단율은 상류의 수심을 암거 높이의 2.3배 증가시키고 평균 유속은 기본 경우보다 3배 더 증가시키는 것으로 입증되었다. 막힘 비율의 함수로 상대 최대 세굴 깊이를 추정하는 방정식이 만들어졌습니다.

Blockage through crossing structures is one of the dangerous problems that threaten its stability. There are few researches concerned with blockage shape in culverts and its effect on characteristics of scour downstream it.

The study’s purpose is to discuss the action of blockage through box culvert on both water surface and scour numerically. A sediment transport model has been investigated for this purpose using FLOW 3D v11.1.0. Different ratios of blockage through box culvert have been studied. The FLOW 3D model was calibrated with experimental data.

The results present that the FLOW 3D program was capable to simulate accurately the scour downstream box culvert. The velocity distribution, maximum scour depth and water depths for blocked cases have been plotted and compared with the non-blocked case (base case).

The results proved that the blockage ratio 70% of culvert height makes the water depth upstream increases by 2.3 times of culvert height and mean velocity increases by 3 times more than in the base case. An equation has been created to estimate the relative maximum scour depth as a function of blockage ratio.

1. Introduction

Local scour is the removal of granular bed material by the action of hydrodynamic forces. As the depth of scour hole increases, the stability of the foundation of the structure may be endangered, with a consequent risk of damage and failure [1]. So the prediction and control of scour is considered to be very important for protecting the water structures from failure. Most previous studies were designed to study the different factors that impact on scour and their relationship with scour hole dimensions like fluid characteristics, flow conditions, bed properties, and culvert geometry. Many previous researches studied the effect of flow rate on scour hole by information Froude number or modified Froude number [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Cesar Mendoza [6] found a good correlation between the scour depth and the discharge Intensity (Qg−.5D−2.5). Breusers and Raudkiv [7] used shear velocity in the outlet-scour prediction procedure. Ali and Lim [8] used the densimetric Froude number in estimation of the scour depth [1], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. “The densimetric Froude number presents the ratio of the tractive force on sediment particle to the submerged specific weight of the sediment” [15](1)Fd=uρsρ-1gD50

Ali and Lim [8] pointed to the consequence of tailwater depth on scour behavior [1], [2], [8], [13]. Abida and Townsend [2] indicated that the maximum depth of local scour downstream culvert was varying with the tailwater depth in three ways: first, for very shallow tailwater depths, local scouring decreases with a decrease in tailwater depth; second, when the ratio of tailwater depth to culvert height ranged between 0.2 and 0.7, the scour depth increases with decreasing tailwater depth; and third for a submerged outlet condition. The tailwater depth has only a marginal effect on the maximum depth of scour [2]. Ruff et al. [16] observed that for materials having similar mean grain sizes (d50) but different standard deviations (σ). As (σ) increased, the maximum scour hole depth decreased. Abt et al. [4] mentioned to role of soil type of maximum scour depth. It was noticed that local scour was more dangerous for uniform sands than for well-graded mixtures [1], [2], [4], [9], [17], [18]. Abt et al [3], [19] studied the culvert shape effect on scour hole. The results evidenced that the culvert shape has a limited effect on outlet scour. Under equivalent discharge conditions, it was noted that a square culvert with height equal to the diameter of a circular culvert would reduce scour [16], [20]. The scour hole dimension was also effected by the culvert slope. Abt et al. [3], [21] showed that the culvert slope is a key element in estimating the culvert flow velocity, the discharge capacity, and sediment transport capability. Abt et al. [21], [22] tested experimentally culvert drop height effect on maximum scour depth. It was observed that as the drop height was increasing, the depth of scour was also increasing. From the previous studies, it could have noticed that the most scour prediction formula downstream unblocked culvert was the function of densimetric Froude number, soil properties (d50, σ), tailwater depth and culvert opening size. Blockage is the phenomenon of plugging water structures due to the movement of water flow loaded with sediment and debris. Water structures blockage has a bad effect on water flow where it causes increasing of upstream water level that may cause flooding around the structure and increase of scour rate downstream structures [23], [24]. The blockage phenomenon through was studied experimentally and numerical [15], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]. Jaeger and Lucke [33] studied the debris transport behavior in a natural channel in Australia. Froude number scale model of an existing culvert was used. It was noticed that through rainfall event, the mobility of debris was impressed by stream shape (depth and width). The condition of the vegetation (size and quantities) through the catchment area was the main factor in debris transport. Rigby et al. [26] reported that steep slope was increasing the ability to mobilize debris that form field data of blocked culverts and bridges during a storm in Wollongong city.

Streftaris et al. [32] studied the probability of screen blockage by debris at trash screens through a numerical model to relate between the blockage probability and nature of the area around. Recently, many commercial computational fluid programs (CFD) such as SSIIM, Fluent, and FLOW 3D are used in the analysis of the scour process. Scour and sediment transport numerical model need to validate by using experimental data or field data [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Epely-Chauvin et al. [36] investigated numerically the effect of a series of parallel spur diked. The experimental data were compared by SSIIM and FLOW 3D program. It was found that the accuracy of calibrated FLOW 3D model was better than SSIIM model. Nielsen et al. [35] used the physical model and FLOW 3D model to analyze the scour process around the pile. The soil around the pile was uniform coarse stones in the physical models that were simulated by regular spheres, porous media, and a mixture of them. The calibrated porous media model can be used to determine the bed shear stress. In partially blocked culverts, there aren’t many studies that explain the blockage impact on scour dimensions. Sorourian et al. [14], [15] studied the effect of inlet partial blockage on scour characteristics downstream box culvert. It resulted that the partial blockage at the culvert inlet could be the main factor in estimating the depth of scour. So, this study is aiming to investigate the effects of blockage through a box culvert on flow and scour characteristics by different blockage ratios and compares the results with a non-blocked case. Create a dimensionless equation relates the blockage ratio of the culvert with scour characteristics downstream culvert.

2. Experimental data

The experimental work of the study was conducted in the Hydraulics and Water Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Egypt. The flume had a rectangular cross-section of 66 cm width, 65.5 cm depth, and 16.2 m long. A rectangular culvert was built with 0.2 m width, 0.2 m height and 3.00 m long with θ = 25° gradually outlet and 0.8 m fixed apron. The model was located on the mid-point of the channel. The sediment part was extended for a distance 2.20 m with 0.66 m width and 0.20 m depth of coarse sand with specific weight 1.60 kg/cm3, d50 = 2.75 mm and σ (d90/d50) = 1.50. The particle size distribution was as shown in Fig. 1. The experimental model was tested for different inlet flow (Q) of 25, 30, 34, 40 l/s for different submerged ratio (S) of 1.25, 1.50, 1.75.

3. Dimensional analysis

A dimensional analysis has been used to reduce the number of variables which affecting on the scour pattern downstream partial blocked culvert. The main factors affecting the maximum scour depth are:(2)ds=f(b.h.L.hb.lb.Q.ud.hu.hd.D50.ρ.ρs.g.ls.dd.ld)

Fig. 2 shows a definition sketch of the experimental model. The maximum scour depth can be written in a dimensionless form as:(3)dsh=f(B.Fd.S)where the ds/h is the relative maximum scour depth.

4. Numerical work

The FLOW 3D is (CFD) program used by many researchers and appeared high accuracy in solving hydrodynamic and sediment transport models in the three dimensions. Numerical simulation with FLOW 3D was performed to study the impacts of blockage ratio through box culvert on shear stress, velocity distribution and the sediment transport in terms of the hydrodynamic features (water surface, velocity and shear stress) and morphological parameters (scour depth and sizes) conditions in accurately and efficiently. The renormalization group (RNG) turbulence model was selected due to its high ability to predict the velocity profiles and turbulent kinetic energy for the flow through culvert [39]. The one-fluid incompressible mode was used to simulate the water surface. Volume of fluid (VOF) method was employed in FLOW 3D to tracks a liquid interface through arbitrary deformations and apply the correct boundary conditions at the interface [40].1.

Governing equations

Three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) equation was applied for incompressible viscous fluid motion. The continuity equation is as following:(4)VF∂ρ∂t+∂∂xρuAx+∂∂yρvAy+∂∂zρwAz=RDIF(5)∂u∂t+1VFuAx∂u∂x+vAy∂u∂y+ωAz∂u∂z=-1ρ∂P∂x+Gx+fx(6)∂v∂t+1VFuAx∂v∂x+vAy∂v∂y+ωAz∂v∂z=-1ρ∂P∂y+Gy+fy(7)∂ω∂t+1VFuAx∂ω∂x+vAy∂ω∂y+ωAz∂ω∂z=-1ρ∂P∂z+Gz+fz

ρ is the fluid density,

VF is the volume fraction,

(x,y,z) is the Cartesian coordinates,

(u,v,w) are the velocity components,

(Ax,Ay,Az) are the area fractions and

RDIF is the turbulent diffusion.

P is the average hydrodynamic pressure,

(Gx, Gy, Gz) are the body accelerations and

(fx, fy, fz) are the viscous accelerations.

The motion of sediment transport (suspended, settling, entrainment, bed load) is estimated by predicting the erosion, advection and deposition process as presented in [41].

The critical shields parameter is (θcr) is defined as the critical shear stress τcr at which sediments begin to move on a flat and horizontal bed [41]:(8)θcr=τcrgd50(ρs-ρ)

The Soulsby–Whitehouse [42] is used to predict the critical shields parameter as:(9)θcr=0.31+1.2d∗+0.0551-e(-0.02d∗)(10)d∗=d50g(Gs-1ν3where:

d* is the dimensionless grain size

Gs is specific weight (Gs = ρs/ρ)

The entrainment coefficient (0.005) was used to scale the scour rates and fit the experimental data. The settling velocity controls the Soulsby deposition equation. The volumetric sediment transport rate per width of the bed is calculated using Van Rijn [43].2.

Meshing and geometry of model

After many trials, it was found that the uniform cell size with 0.03 m cell size is the closest to the experimental results and takes less time. As shown in Fig. 3. In x-direction, the total model length in this direction is 700 cm with mesh planes at −100, 0, 300, 380 and 600 cm respectively from the origin point, in y-direction, the total model length in this direction is 66 cm at distances 0, 23, 43 and 66 cm respectively from the origin point. In z-direction, the total model length in this direction is 120 cm. with mesh planes at −20, 0, 20 and 100 cm respectively.3.

Boundary condition

As shown in Fig. 4, the boundary conditions of the model have been defined to simulate the experimental flow conditions accurately. The upstream boundary was defined as the volume flow rate with a different flow rate. The downstream boundary was defined as specific pressure with different fluid elevation. Both of the right side, the left side, and the bottom boundary were defined as a wall. The top boundary defined as specified pressure with pressure value equals zero.

5. Validation of experimental results and numerical results

The experimental results investigated the flow and scour characteristics downstream culvert due to different flow conditions. The measured value of maximum scour depth is compared with the simulated depth from FLOW 3D model as shown in Fig. 5. The scour results show that the simulated results from the numerical model is quite close to the experimental results with an average error of 3.6%. The water depths in numerical model results is so close to the experimental results as shown in Fig. 6 where the experiment and numerical results are compared at different submerged ratios and flow rates. The results appear maximum error percentage in water depths upstream and downstream the culvert is about 2.37%. This indicated that the FLOW 3D is efficient for the prediction of maximum scour depth and the flow depths downstream box culvert.

6. Computation time

The run time was chosen according to reaching to the stability limit. Hydraulic stability was achieved after 50 s, where the scour development may still go on. For run 1, the numerical simulation was run for 1000 s as shown in Fig. 7 where it mostly reached to scour stability at 800 s. The simulation time was taken 500 s at about 95% of scour stability.

7. Analysis and discussions

Fig. 8 shows the study sections where sec 1 represents to upstream section, sec2 represents to inside section and sec3 represents to downstream stream section. Table 1 indicates the scour hole dimensions at different blockage case. The symbol (B) represents to blockage and the number points to blockage ratio. B0 case signifies to the non-blocked case, B30 is that blockage height is 30% to the culvert height and so on.

Table 1. The scour results of different blockage ratio.

Casehb cmB = hb/hQ lit/sSFdd50 mmds/h measuredls/hdd/hld/hds/h estimated
B000351.261.692.50.581.500.275.000.46
B3060.30351.261.682.50.481.250.274.250.40
B50100.50351.221.742.50.451.100.244.000.37
B70140.70351.231.732.50.431.500.165.500.33

7.1. Scour hole geometry

The scour hole geometry mainly depends on the properties of soil of the bed downstream the fixed apron. From Table 1, the results show that the maximum scour depth in B0 case is about 0.58 of culvert height while the maximum deposition in B0 is 0.27 culvert height. There is a symmetric scour hole as shown in Fig. 9 in B0 case. An asymmetric scour hole is created in B50 and B70 due to turbulences that causes the deviation of the jet direction from the center of the flume where appear in Fig. 11 and Fig. 19.

7.2. Flow water surface

Fig. 10 presents the relative free surface water (hw/h) along the x-direction at center of the box culvert. From the mention Figure, it is easy to release the effect of different blockage ratios. The upstream water level rises by increasing the blockage ratio. Increasing upstream water level may cause flooding over the banks of the waterway. In the 70% blockage case, the upstream water level rises to 2.3 times of culvert height more than the non-blocked case at the same discharge and submerged ratio. The water surface profile shows an increase in water level upstream the culvert due to a decrease in transverse velocity. Because of decreasing velocity downstream culvert, there is an increase in water level before it reaches its uniform depth.

7.3. Velocity vectors

Scour downstream hydraulic structures mainly affects by velocities distribution and bed shear stress. Fig. 11 shows the velocity vectors and their magnitude in xz plane at the same flow conditions. The difference in the upstream water level due to the different blockage ratios is so clear. The maximum water level is in B70 and the minimum level is in B0. The inlet mean velocity value is about 0.88 m/s in B0 increases to 2.86 m/s in B70. As the blockage ratio increases, the inlet velocity increases. The outlet velocity in B0 case makes downward jet causes scour hole just after the fixed apron in the middle of the bed while the blockage causes upward water flow that appears clearly in B70. The upward jet decreases the scour depth to 0.13 culvert height less than B0 case. After the scour hole, the velocity decreases and the flow becomes uniform.

7.4. Velocity distribution

Fig. 12 represents flow velocity (Vx) distribution along the vertical depth (z/hu) upstream the inlet for the different blockage ratios at the same flow conditions. From the Figure, the maximum velocity creates closed to bed in B0 while in blocked case, the maximum horizontal velocity creates at 0.30 of relative vertical depth (z/hu). Fig. 13 shows the (Vz) distribution along the vertical depth (z/hu) upstream culvert at sec 1. From the mentioned Figure, it is easy to note that the maximum vertical is in B70 which appears that as the blockage ratio increases the vertical ratio also increases. In the non-blocked case. The vertical velocity (Vz) is maximum at (z/hu) equals 0.64. At the end of the fixed apron (sec 3), the horizontal velocity (Vx) is slowly increasing to reach the maximum value closed to bed in B0 and B30 while the maximum horizontal velocity occurs near to the top surface in B50 and B70 as shown in Fig. 14. The vertical velocity component along the vertical depth (z/hd) is presented in Fig. 15. The vertical velocity (Vz) is maximum in B0 at vertical depth (z/hd) 0.3 with value 0.45 m/s downward. Figs. 16 and 17 observe velocity components (Vx, Vz) along the vertical depth just after the end of blockage length at the centerline of the culvert barrel. It could be noticed the uniform velocity distribution in B0 case with horizontal velocity (Vx) closed to 1.0 m/s and vertical velocity closed to zero. In the blocked case, the maximum horizontal velocity occurs in depth more than the blockage height.

7.5. Bed velocity distribution

Fig. 18 presents the x-velocity vectors at 1.5 cm above the bed for different blockage ratios from the velocity vectors distribution and magnitude, it is easy to realize the position of the scour hole and deposition region. In B0 and B30, the flow is symmetric so that the scour hole is created around the centerline of flow while in B50 and B70 cases, the flow is asymmetric and the scour hole creates in the right of flow direction in B50. The maximum scour depth is found in the left of flow direction in B70 case where the high velocity region is found.

8. Maximum scour depth prediction

Regression analysis is used to estimate maximum scour depth downstream box culvert for different ratios of blockage by correlating the maximum relative scour by other variables that affect on it in one formula. An equation is developed to predict maximum scour depth for blocked and non-blocked. As shown in the equation below, the relative maximum scour depth(ds/hd) is a function of densimetric Froude number (Fd), blockage ratio (B) and submerged ratio (S)(11)dsh=0.56Fd-0.20B+0.45S-1.05

In this equation the coefficient of correlation (R2) is 0.82 with standard error equals 0·08. The developed equation is valid for Fd = [0.9 to 2.10] and submerged ratio (S) ≥ 1.00. Fig. 19 shows the comparison between relative maximum scour depths (ds/h) measured and estimated for different blockage ratios. Fig. 20 clears the comparison between residuals and ds/h estimated for the present study. From these figures, it could be noticed that there is a good agreement between the measured and estimated relative scour depth.

9. Comparison with previous scour equations

Many previous scour formulae have been produced for calculation the maximum scour depth downstream non-blockage culvert. These equations have been included the effect of flow regime, culvert shape, soil properties and the flow rate on maximum scour depth. Two of previous experimental studies data have been chosen to be compared with the present study results in non-blocked study data. Table 2 shows comparison of culvert shape, densmetric Froude number, median particle size and scour equations for these previous studies. By applying the present study data in these studies scour formula as shown in Fig. 21, it could be noticed that there are a good agreement between present formula results and others empirical equations results. Where that Lim [44] and Abt [4] are so closed to the present study data.

Table 2. Comparison of some previous scour formula.

ResearchersFdCulvert shaped50(mm)Proposed equationSubmerged ratio
Present study0.9–2.11square2.75dsh=0.56Fd-0.20B+0.45S-1.051.25–1.75
Lim [44]1–10Circular1.65dsh=0.45Fd0.47
Abt [4]Fd ≥ 1Circular0.22–7.34-dsh=3.67Fd0.57∗D500.4∗σ-0.4–

10. Conclusions

The present study has shown that the FLOW 3D model can accurately simulate water surface and the scour hole characteristics downstream the box culvert with error percentage in water depths does not exceed 2.37%. Velocities distribution through and outlets culvert barrel helped on understanding the scour hole shape.

The blockage through culvert had caused of increasing of water surface upstream structure where the upstream water level in B70 was 2.3 of culvert height more than non-blocked case at the same discharge that could be dangerous on the stability of roads above. The depth averaged velocity through culvert barrel increased by 3 times its value in non-blocked case.

On the other hand, blockage through culvert had a limited effect on the maximum scour depth. The little effect of blockage on maximum scour depth could be noticed in Fig. 11. From this Figure, it could be noted that the residual part of culvert barrel after the blockage part had made turbulences. These turbulences caused the deviation of the flow resulting in the formation of asymmetric scour hole on the side of channel. This not only but in B70 the blockage height caused upward jet which made a wide far scour hole as cleared from the results in Table 1.

An empirical equation was developed from the results to estimate the maximum scour depth relative to culvert height function of blockage ratio (B), submerged ratio (S), and densimetric Froude number (Fd). The equation results was compared with some scour formulas at the same densimetric Froude number rang where the present study results was in between the other equations results as shown in Fig. 21.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]P. Sarathi, M. Faruque, R. BalachandarInfluence of tailwater depth, sediment size and densimetric Froude number on scour by submerged square wall jetsJ. Hydraul. Res., 46 (2) (2008), pp. 158-175CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[2]H. Abida, R. TownsendLocal scour downstream of box-culvert outletsJ. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 117 (3) (1991), pp. 425-440CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[3]S.R. Abt, C.A. Donnell, J.F. Ruff, F.K. DoehringCulvert Slope and Shape Effects on Outlet ScourTransp. Res. Rec., 1017 (1985), pp. 24-30View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[4]S.R. Abt, R.L. Kloberdanz, C. MendozaUnified culvert scour determinationJ. Hydraul. Eng., 110 (10) (1984), pp. 1475-1479CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[5]J.P. Bohan, Erosion And Riprap Requirements At Culvert And Storm-Drain Outlets, ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISS1970.Google Scholar[6]C. Mendoza, S.R. Abt, J.F. RuffHeadwall influence on scour at culvert outletsJ. Hydraul. Eng., 109 (7) (1983), pp. 1056-1060CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[7]H. Breusers, A. Raudkivi, Scouring, hydraulic structures design manual, vol. 143, IAHR, AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 1991.Google Scholar[8]K. Ali, S. LimLocal scour caused by submerged wall jetsProc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 81 (4) (1986), pp. 607-645CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[9]O. Aderibigbe, N. RajaratnamEffect of sediment gradation on erosion by plane turbulent wall jetsJ. Hydraul. Eng., 124 (10) (1998), pp. 1034-1042View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[10]F.W. Blaisdell, C.L. AndersonA comprehensive generalized study of scour at cantilevered pipe outletsJ. Hydraul. Res., 26 (4) (1988), pp. 357-376CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[11]Y.-M. Chiew, S.-Y. LimLocal scour by a deeply submerged horizontal circular jetJ. Hydraul. Eng., 122 (9) (1996), pp. 529-532View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[12]R.A. Day, S.L. Liriano, W.R. WhiteEffect of tailwater depth and model scale on scour at culvert outletsProc. Instit. Civil Eng. – Water Marit. Eng., 148 (3) (2001), pp. 189-198http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/10.1680/wame.2001.148.3.189, 10.1680/wame.2001.148.3.189View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[13]S. Emami, A.J. SchleissPrediction of localized scour hole on natural mobile bed at culvert outletsScour and Erosion (2010), pp. 844-853CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[14]S. Sorourian, A. Keshavarzi, J. Ball, B. SamaliStudy of Blockage Effect on Scouring Pattern Downstream of a Box Culvert under Unsteady FlowAustr. J Water Resor. (2013)Google Scholar[15]S. Sorourian, Turbulent Flow Characteristics At The Outlet Of Partially Blocked Box Culverts, in: 36th IAHR World Congress, The Hague, the Netherlands, 2015.Google Scholar[16]J. Ruff, S. Abt, C. Mendoza, A. Shaikh, R. KloberdanzScour at culvert outlets in mixed bed materialsUnited States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research and Development (1982)Google Scholar[17]S.A. Ansari, U.C. Kothyari, K.G.R. RajuInfluence of cohesion on scour under submerged circular vertical jetsJ. Hydraul. Eng., 129 (12) (2003), pp. 1014-1019View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[18]B. Crookston B. Tullis, Scour and Riprap Protection in a Bottomless Arch Culvert, in: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008: Ahupua’A, 2008, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar[19]S.R. Abt, J. Ruff, F. Doehring, C. DonnellInfluence of culvert shape on outlet scourJ. Hydraul. Eng., 113 (3) (1987), pp. 393-400View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[20]Y.H. Chen, Scour at outlets of box culverts, Colorado State University, 1970.Google Scholar[21]S. Abt, P. Thompson, T. LewisEnhancement of the culvert outlet scour estimation equationsTransp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 1523 (1996), pp. 178-185View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[22]F.K. Doehring, S.R. AbtDrop height influence on outlet scourJ. Hydraul. Eng., 120 (12) (1994), pp. 1470-1476CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[23]W. Weeks, A. Barthelmess, E. Rigby, G. Witheridge, R. Adamson, Australian rainfall and runoff revison project 11: blockage of hydraulic structures, 2009.Google Scholar[24]W. Weeks, G. Witheridge, E. Rigby, A. BarthelmessProject 11: blockage of hydraulic structuresEngineers Australia (2013)Google Scholar[25]S.R. Abt, T.E. Brisbane, D.M. Frick, C.A. McKnightTrash rack blockage in supercritical flowJ. Hydraul. Eng., 118 (12) (1992), pp. 1692-1696View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[26]E. Rigby, M. Boyd, S. Roso, P. Silveri, A. Davis, Causes and effects of culvert blockage during large storms, in: Global solutions for urban drainage, 2002, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar[27]S. Roso, M. Boyd, E. Rigby, R. VanDrie“Prediction of increased flooding in urban catchments due to debris blockage and flow diversionsProceedings Novatech (2004), pp. 8-13View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[28]C.-D. Jan, C.-L. ChenDebris flows caused by Typhoon Herb in Taiwanin Debris-Flow Hazards and Related Phenomena, Springer (2005), pp. 539-563CrossRefGoogle Scholar[29]L.W. Zevenbergen, P.F. Lagasse, P.E. Clopper, Effects of debris on bridge pier scour, in: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007: Restoring Our Natural Habitat, 2007, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar[30]A. Barthelmess, E. Rigby, Estimating Culvert and Bridge Blockages-a Simplified Procedure, in: Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro-Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering, Engineers Australia, 2011, pp. 39.Google Scholar[31]E. Rigby, A. Barthelmess, Culvert Blockage Mechanisms and their Impact on Flood Behaviour, in: Proceedings of the 34th World Congress of the International Association for Hydro-Environment Research and Engineering: 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium and 10th Conference on Hydraulics in Water Engineering, Engineers Australia, 2011, pp. 380.Google Scholar[32]G. Streftaris, N. Wallerstein, G. Gibson, S. ArthurModeling probability of blockage at culvert trash screens using Bayesian approachJ. Hydraul. Eng., 139 (7) (2012), pp. 716-726Google Scholar[33]R. Jaeger, T. LuckeInvestigating the relationship between rainfall intensity, catchment vegetation and debris mobilityInt. J. GEOMATE, 12 (33) (2017), pp. 22-29 Download PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[34]S. Amiraslani, J. Fahimi, H. Mehdinezhad, The Numerical Investigation of Free Falling Jet’s Effect On the Scour of Plunge Pool, in: XVIII International conference on water resources, Tehran University, Iran, 2008.Google Scholar[35]A.W. Nielsen, X. Liu, B.M. Sumer, J. FredsøeFlow and bed shear stresses in scour protections around a pile in a currentCoast. Eng., 72 (2013), pp. 20-38ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[36]G. Epely-Chauvin, G. De Cesare, S. SchwindtNumerical modelling of plunge pool scour evolution in non-cohesive sedimentsEng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 8 (4) (2014), pp. 477-487 Download PDFCrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[37]H. Karami, H. Basser, A. Ardeshir, S.H. HosseiniVerification of numerical study of scour around spur dikes using experimental dataWater Environ. J., 28 (1) (2014), pp. 124-134CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[38]S.-H. Oh, K.S. Lee, W.-M. JeongThree-dimensional experiment and numerical simulation of the discharge performance of sluice passageway for tidal power plantRenew. Energy, 92 (2016), pp. 462-473ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[39]M.A. Khodier, B.P. TullisExperimental and computational comparison of baffled-culvert hydrodynamics for fish passageJ. Appl. Water Eng. Res. (2017), pp. 1-9CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[40]F.S. Inc., FLOW-3D user’s manual, Flow Science, Inc., 2009.Google Scholar[41]G. Wei, J. Brethour, M. Grünzner, J. BurnhamSedimentation scour modelFlow Science Report, 7 (2014), pp. 1-29View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[42]R. Soulsby, R. Whitehouse, Threshold of sediment motion in coastal environments, in: Pacific Coasts and Ports’ 97: Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Coastal and Ocean Engineering Conference and the 6th Australasian Port and Harbour Conference, vol. 1, Centre for Advanced Engineering, University of Canterbury, 1997, pp. 145.Google Scholar[43]L.C.v. RijnSediment transport, part II: suspended load transportJ. Hydraul. Eng., 110 (11) (1984), pp. 1613-1641View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar[44]S Y LIMScour below unsubmerged full-flowing culvert outletsProc. Instit. Civil Eng. – Water Marit. Energy, 112 (2) (1995), pp. 136-149http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/10.1680/iwtme.1995.27659, 10.1680/iwtme.1995.27659View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar

Peer review under responsibility of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.

Figure 1- Schematic diagram of pooled stepped spillway conducted by Felder et al. (2012A): Notes: h step height (10 cm): w pool height (3.1 cm): l horizontal step length (20 cm): lw pool weir length (1.5 cm): d' is the water depth above the crest; y' is the distance normal to the crest invert

Study of inception point, void fraction and pressure over pooled stepped spillways using Flow-3D

Khosro Morovati , Afshin Eghbalzadeh 
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow

ISSN: 0961-5539

Article publication date: 3 April 2018

Abstract

많은 계단식 배수로 지오메트리 설계 지침이 평평한 단계를 위해 개발되었지만 통합 단계를 설계하는 것이 더 효율적으로 작동하는 배수로에 대한 적절한 대안이 될 수 있습니다.

이 논문은 POOL의 다른 높이에서 공기 연행과 보이드 비율의 시작점을 다루는 것을 목표로 합니다. 그 후, FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 POOL과 경사면의 높이를 다르게 하여 폭기된 지역과 폭기되지 않은 지역에서 압력 분포를 평가했습니다.

얻어진 수치 결과와 실험 결과의 비교는 본 연구에 사용된 모든 방류에 대해 잘 일치했습니다. POOL 높이는 시작 지점 위치에 미미한 영향을 미쳤습니다. 공극률의 값은 높은 방류에 비해 낮은 방전에서 더 많은 영향을 받았습니다.

여수로의 마루(통기되지 않은 지역)에서는 음압이 나타나지 않았으며 각 방류에서 마루를 따라 높이가 15cm인 수영장에서 최대 압력 값이 얻어졌습니다.

모든 사면에서 웅덩이 및 평평한 계단형 여수로의 계단층 부근에서는 음압이 형성되지 않았습니다. 그러나 평단식 여수로에 비해 평단식 여수로의 수직면 부근에서 음압이 더 많이 형성되어 평단식 슈트에서 캐비테이션 현상이 발생할 확률이 증가하였습니다.

Study of inception point, void fraction and pressure over pooled
stWhile many stepped spillways geometry design guidelines were developed for flat steps, designing pooled steps might be an appropriate alternative to spillways working more efficiency. This paper aims to deal with the inception point of air-entrainment and void fraction in the different height of the pools. Following that, pressure distribution was evaluated in aerated and non-aerated regions under the effect of different heights of the pools and slopes through the use of the FLOW-3D software. Comparison of obtained numerical results with experimental ones was in good agreement for all discharges used in this study. Pools height had the insignificant effect on the inception point location. The value of void fraction was more affected in lower discharges in comparison with higher ones. Negative pressure was not seen over the crest of spillway (non-aerated region), and the maximum pressure values were obtained for pools with 15 cm height along the crest in each discharge. In all slopes, negative pressure was not formed near the step bed in the pooled and flat stepped spillways. However, negative pressure was formed in more area near the vertical face in the flat stepped spillway compared with the pooled stepped spillway which increases the probability of cavitation phenomenon in the flat stepped chute.

Design/methodology/approach

압력, 공극률 및 시작점을 평가하기 위해 POOL된 계단식 여수로가 사용되었습니다. 또한 POOL의 다른 높이가 사용되었습니다. 이 연구의 수치 시뮬레이션은 Flow-3D 소프트웨어를 통해 수행되었습니다. 얻어진 결과는 풀이 압력, 공극률 및 시작점을 포함한 2상 유동 특성에 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 나타냅니다.

Findings

마루 위에는 음압이 보이지 않았습니다. 압력 값은 사용된 모든 높이와 15cm 높이에서 얻은 최대 값에 대해 다릅니다. 또한, 풀링 스텝은 플랫 케이스에 비해 음압점 감소에 더 효과적인 역할을 하였습니다. 시작 지점 위치는 특히 9 및 15cm 높이에 대해 스키밍 흐름 영역과 비교하여 낮잠 및 전환 흐름 영역에서 더 많은 영향을 받았습니다.

Keywords

Citation

Morovati, K. and Eghbalzadeh, A. (2018), “Study of inception point, void fraction and pressure over pooled stepped spillways using Flow-3D”, International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 982-998. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-03-2017-0112

Figure 1- Schematic diagram of pooled stepped spillway conducted by Felder et al. (2012A): Notes: h step height (10 cm): w pool height (3.1 cm): l horizontal step length (20 cm): lw pool weir length (1.5 cm): d' is the water depth above the crest; y' is the distance normal to the crest invert
Figure 1- Schematic diagram of pooled stepped spillway conducted by Felder et al. (2012A): Notes: h step height (10 cm): w pool height (3.1 cm): l horizontal step length (20 cm): lw pool weir length (1.5 cm): d’ is the water depth above the crest; y’ is the distance normal to the crest invert
Figure 2- meshing domain and distribution of blocks
Figure 2- meshing domain and distribution of blocks
Figure 3- Comparison of numerical simulation with experimental data by Felder et al. (2012A); mesh convergence analysis; pooled stepped spillway (slope: 26.6 0 )
Figure 3- Comparison of numerical simulation with experimental data by Felder et al. (2012A); mesh convergence analysis; pooled stepped spillway (slope: 26.6 0 )
Figure 4- Comparison of numerical simulation with experimental data by Felder et al. (2012A); Flat stepped spillway (slope: 0 26 6. )
Figure 4- Comparison of numerical simulation with experimental data by Felder et al. (2012A); Flat stepped spillway (slope: 0 26 6. )
Figure 5-Comparison of numerical simulation with experimental data by Felder et al. (2012B); pooled and flat stepped spillways (slope: 0 9.8 )
Figure 5-Comparison of numerical simulation with experimental data by Felder et al. (2012B); pooled and flat stepped spillways (slope: 0 9.8 )
Figure 6- TKE distribution on steps 8, 9 and 10 for four different mesh numbers: 261252 (model 1), 288941 (model 2), 323578 (model 3) and 343154 (model 4)
Figure 6- TKE distribution on steps 8, 9 and 10 for four different mesh numbers: 261252 (model 1), 288941 (model 2), 323578 (model 3) and 343154 (model 4)
Figure 7- Comparison of obtained Void fraction distribution on step 10 in numerical simulation with experimental work conducted by Felder et al. (2012A); (slope 26.60 )
Figure 7- Comparison of obtained Void fraction distribution on step 10 in numerical simulation with experimental work conducted by Felder et al. (2012A); (slope 26.60 )
Figure 8- Results of inception point of air entrainment in different height of the pools: comparison with empirical correlations (Eqs 8-9), experimental (Felder et al. (2012A)) and numerical data
Figure 8- Results of inception point of air entrainment in different height of the pools: comparison with empirical correlations (Eqs 8-9), experimental (Felder et al. (2012A)) and numerical data
Figure 9- Void fraction distribution for different pool heights on steps 10; slope 26.6 0
Figure 9- Void fraction distribution for different pool heights on steps 10; slope 26.6 0
Figure 10- Comparison of pressure distribution between numerical simulation and experimental work conducted by Zhang and Chanson (2016); flat stepped spillway (slope: 0 45 )
Figure 10- Comparison of pressure distribution between numerical simulation and experimental work conducted by Zhang and Chanson (2016); flat stepped spillway (slope: 0 45 )
Figure 11- A comparison of the pressure distribution above the crest of the spillway; B comparison of the free surface profile along the crest of the spillway. Note: x' indicates the longitudinal distance from the starting point of the crest.
Figure 11- A comparison of the pressure distribution above the crest of the spillway; B comparison of the free surface profile along the crest of the spillway. Note: x’ indicates the longitudinal distance from the starting point of the crest.
Figure 12- pressure distribution along crest of spillway in different discharges; slope 26.6
Figure 12- pressure distribution along crest of spillway in different discharges; slope 26.6
Figure 13- Pressure distribution near the last step bed for different slopes and discharges: x'' indicatesthe longitudinal distance from the intersection of the horizontal and vertical faces of step 10; y" is the distance from the intersection of the horizontal and vertical faces in the vertical direction
Figure 13- Pressure distribution near the last step bed for different slopes and discharges: x” indicatesthe longitudinal distance from the intersection of the horizontal and vertical faces of step 10; y” is the distance from the intersection of the horizontal and vertical faces in the vertical direction
Figure 14- Pressure distribution adjacent the vertical face of step 9 for different discharges and slopes
Figure 14- Pressure distribution adjacent the vertical face of step 9 for different discharges and slopes
Table1- Used discharges for assessments of mesh convergence analysis and hydraulic characteristics
Table1- Used discharges for assessments of mesh convergence analysis and hydraulic characteristics

Conclusion

본 연구에서는 자유표면을 모사하기 위해 VOF 방법과 k -ε (RNG) 난류 모델을 활용하여 FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하였고, 계단식 배수로의 유동을 모사하기 위한 목적으로 난류 특성을 모사하였다. 얻은 결과는 수치 모델이 시작점 위치, 보이드 비율 및 압력을 적절하게 시뮬레이션했음을 나타냅니다. 풀의 높이는 공기 유입 위치에 미미한 영향을 미치므로 얻은 결과는 이 문서에서 제시된 상관 관계와 잘 일치했습니다. 즉, 사용 가능한 상관 관계를 서로 다른 풀 높이에 사용할 수 있습니다. 공극률의 결과는 스텝 풀 근처의 나프 유동 영역에서 공극율 값이 다른 배출보다 더 큰 것으로 나타났다. 더욱이 고방출량 .0 113m3/s에서 수영장 높이를 변경해도 수영장 표면 근처의 공극률 값에는 영향을 미치지 않았습니다.

낮잠 및 전환 체제의 압력 분포에 대한 0 및 3cm 높이의 수영장 효과는 많은 지점에서 대부분 유사했습니다. 더욱이 조사된 모든 높이에서 여수로의 마루를 따라 부압이 없었습니다. 여수로 끝단의 바닥 부근의 압력 결과는 평평하고 고인 경우 부압이 발생하지 않았음을 나타냅니다. 수직면 부근의 음압은 웅덩이에 비해 평평한 계단형 여수로의 깊이(w=0 cm)의 대부분에서 발생하였다. 또한 더 큰 사면에 대한 풀링 케이스에서 음압이 제거되었습니다. 평단식 여수로에서는 계단의 수직면에 인접한 더 넓은 지역에서 음압이 발생하였기 때문에 이 여수로에서는 고형단식여수로보다 캐비테이션 현상이 발생할 가능성이 더 큽니다.

In this study, the FLOW-3D software was used through utilizing the VOF method and k −ε (RNG) turbulence model in order to simulate free surface, and turbulence characteristics for the purpose of simulating flow over pooled stepped spillway. The results obtained indicated that the numerical model properly simulated the inception point location, void fraction, and pressure. The height of the pools has the insignificant effect on the location of air entrainment, so that obtained results were in good agreement with the correlations presented in this paper. In other words, available correlations can be used for different pool heights. The results of void fraction showed that the void fraction values in nappe flow regime near the step pool were more than the other discharges. Furthermore in high discharge, 0.113m3/s, altering pool height had no effect on the value of void fraction near the pool surface.

The effect of the pools with 0 and 3 cm heights over the pressure distribution in nappe and transition regimes was mostly similar in many points. Furthermore, in all examined heights there was no negative pressure along the crest of the spillway. The pressure results near the bed of the step at the end of the spillway indicated that negative pressure did not occur in the flat and pooled cases. Negative pressure near the vertical face occurred in the most part of the depth in the flat stepped spillway (w=0 cm) in comparison with the pooled case. Also, the negative pressure was eliminated in the pooled case for the larger slopes. Since negative pressure occurred in a larger area adjacent the vertical face of the steps in the flat stepped spillways, it is more likely that cavitation phenomenon occurs in this spillway rather than the pooled stepped spillways.

References

  1. André, S. (2004), “High velocity aerated flows on stepped chutes with macro-roughness elements.” Ph.D. thesis,
    Laboratoire de Constructions Hydraulics (LCH), EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 272 pages.
  2. Attarian, A. Hosseini, Kh. Abdi, H and Hosseini, M. (2014), “The Effect of the Step Height on Energy
    Dissipation in Stepped Spillways Using Numerical Simulation”. Arabian Journal for Science and
    Engineering, 39(4), 2587-2594.
  3. Bombardelli, F.A. Meireles. I. Matos, J. (2011), “Laboratory measurements and multi-block numerical
    simulations of the mean flow and turbulence in the non-aerated skimming flow region of steep stepped
    spillways”. Environmental fluid mechanics, 11(3) 263-288.
  4. Chakib, B. (2013), “Numerical Computation of Inception Point Location for Flat-sloped Stepped Spillway”.
    International Journal of Hydraulic Engineering; 2(3): 47-52.
  5. Chakib, B. Mohammed, H. (2015), “Numerical Simulation of Air Entrainment for Flat-Sloped Stepped Spillway.
    Journal of computational multiphase flows”, Volume 7. Number 1.
  6. Chanson, H. Toombes, L. (2002), “Air–water flows down stepped chutes: turbulence and flow structure
    observations”. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 28(11) 1737-1761
  7. Chen, Q. Dai, G. Liu, H. (2002), “Volume of Fluid Model for Turbulence Numerical Simulation
    of Stepped Spillway Overflow”. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429128:7(683).
  8. Cheng, X. Chen, Y. Luo, L. (2006), “Numerical simulation of air-water two-phase flow over stepped spillways”.
    Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 49(6), 674-684.
  9. Cheng, X. Luo, L. Zhao, W. (2004), “Study of aeration in the water flow over stepped spillway”. In: Proceedings
    of the world water congress.
  10. Chinnarasri, Ch. Kositgittiwong, D. Julien, Y. (2013), “Model of flow over spillways by computational fluid
    dynamics”. Proceedings of the ICE – Water Management, Volume 167(3) 164 –175.
  11. Dastgheib, A. Niksokhan, M.H. and Nowroozpour, A.R. (2012), “Comparing of Flow Pattern and Energy
    Dissipation over different forms of Stepped Spillway”. World Environmental and Water Resources
    Congress ASCE.
  12. Eghbalzadeh, A. Javan, M. (2012), “Comparison of mixture and VOF models for numerical simulation of air
    entrainment in skimming flow over stepped spillway”. Procedia Engineering, 28. 657-660.
  13. Felder, S, Chanson, H. (2012), “Free-surface Profiles, Velocity and Pressure Distributions on a
    Broad-Crested Weir: a Physical study “Free-surface Profiles, Velocity and Pressure Distributions on a
    Broad-Crested Weir: a Physical study
  14. Felder, S. Fromm, Ch. Chanson, H. (2012B), “Air entrainment and energy dissipation on a 8.9 slope stepped
    spillway with flat and pooled steps”, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland,.
    Brisbane, Australia.
  15. Felder, S. Chanson, H. (2014A), Triple decomposition technique in air–water flows: application to instationary
    flows on a stepped spillway. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 58, 139-153.
  16. Felder, S. Chanson, H. (2014B), Effects of step pool porosity upon flow aeration and energy dissipation on
    pooled stepped spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 140(4), 04014002.
  17. Felder, S. Chanson, H. (2013A), “Air entrainment and energy dissipation on porous pooled stepped spillways”.
    Paper presented at the International Workshop on Hydraulic Design of Low-Head Structures.
  18. Felder, S. Chanson, H. (2013B), “Aeration, flow instabilities, and residual energy on pooled stepped spillways of
    embankment dams”. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 139(10) 880-887.
  19. Felder, S. Guenther, Ph. Chanson, H. (2012A). “Air-water flow properties and energy dissipation on stepped
    spillways: a physical study of several pooled stepped configurations”, School of Civil Engineering, The
    University of Queensland,. Brisbane, Australia.
  20. Flow Science, (2013). “FLOW-3D user’s manual”, version 10.1. Flow Science, Inc, Los Alamos.
  21. Frizell, K.W. Renna, F.M. Matos, J. (2012), “Cavitation potential of flow on stepped spillways”. Journal of
    Hydraulic Engineering, 139(6), 630-636.
  22. Gonzalez, C. (2005), “An experimental study of free-surface aeration on embankment stepped chutes”,
    department of civil engineering, Brisbane, Australia, Phd thesis.
  23. Gonzalez, C.A. Chanson, H. (2008), “Turbulence manipulation in air–water flows on a stepped chute: An
    experimental study”. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 27(4), 388-408.
  24. Guenther, Ph.. Felder, S. Chanson, H. (2013), “Flow aeration, cavity processes and energy dissipation on flat and
    pooled stepped spillways for embankments”. Environmental fluid mechanics, 13(5) 503-525.
  25. Hamedi, A. Mansoori, A. Malekmohamadi, I. Roshanaei, H. (2011), “Estimating Energy Dissipation in Stepped
    Spillways with Reverse Inclined Steps and End Sill”. World Environmental and Water Resources
    Congress, ASCE.
  26. Hirt, C.W. (2003), “Modeling Turbulent Entrainment of Air at a Free Surface”. Flow Science Inc.
  27. Hunt, S.L. Kadavy, K.C. (2013), “Inception point for enbankment dam stepped spillway”. J. Hydraul. Eng.,
    139(1), 60–64.
  28. Hunt, S.L. Kadavy, K.C. (2010), “Inception Point Relationship for Flat-Sloped Stepped
    Spillways”. DOI: 10.1061/ASCEHY.1943-7900.0000297.
  29. Matos, J. Quintela, A. (2000), “Air entrainment and safety against cavitation damage in stepped spillways over
    RCC dams. In: Proceeding Intl. Workshop on Hydraulics of Stepped Spillways”, VAW, ETH-Zurich, H.E.
    Minor and W.H. Hager. Balkema. 69–76.
  30. Meireles, I. Matos, J. (2009), “Skimming flow in the nonaerated region of stepped spillways over embankment
    dams”. J. Hydraul. Eng., 135(8), 685–689.
  31. Miang-liang, ZH. Yong-ming, SH. (2008), “Three dimentional simulation of meandering river basin on 3-D
    RNG k − ε turbulence model”. Journal of hydrodynamics, 20(4): 448-455.
  32. Morovati, Kh. Eghbalzadeh, A. Javan, M. (2015), “Numerical investigation of the configuration of the pools on
    the flowPattern passing over pooled stepped spillway in skimming flow regime. Acta Mech, DOI
    10.1007/s00707-015-1444-x
  33. Morovati, Kh. Eghbalzadeh, A. Soori, S. (2016), “Numerical Study of Energy Dissipation of Pooled Stepped
    spillway”. Civil Engineering Journal. Vol. 2, No. 5.
  34. Nikseresht, A.H. Talebbeydokhti, N. and Rezaei, M.J. (2013), “Numerical simulation of two-phase flow on steppool spillways”. Scientia Iranica, A 20 (2), 222–230.
  35. Peyras, L. Royet, P. Degoutte, G. (1990), “Flow and energy dissipation over stepped gabion weirs”. ASCE
    Convention.
  36. Qun, Ch. Guang-qing, D. Feu-qing, Zh. Qing, Y. (2004). “Three-dimensional turbulence numerical simulation of
    a stepped spillway overflow”. Journal of hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 1, 74-79.
  37. Relvas, A. T. Pinheiro, A. N. (2008), Inception point and air concentration in flows on stepped chutes lined with
    wedge-shaped concrete blocks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(8), 1042-1051
  38. Sanchez, M. (2000), “Pressure field in skimming flow over a stepped spillways”. In: Proceeding Intl. Workshop
    on Hydraulics of Stepped Spillways, VAW, ETH-Zurich, H.E. Minor and W.H. Hager. Balkema,
    137–146.
  39. Sarfaraz, M. Attari, J. Pfister, M. (2012), “Numerical Computation of Inception Point Location for Steeply
    Sloping Stepped Spillways”. 9th International Congress on Civil Engineering, May 8-10. Isfahan
    University of Technology (IUT), Isfahan, Iran.
  40. Savage, Bruce M. Michael C. Johnson. (2001), “Flow over ogee spillway: Physical and numerical model case
    study.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 127.8:640-649.
  41. Shahhedari, H. Jafari Nodoshan, E. Barati, R. Azhdary moghadam, M. (2014). “Discharge coeficient and energy
    dissipation over stepped spillway under skimming flow regime”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, DOI
    10.1007/s12205-013-0749-3.
  42. Tabbara, M. Chatila, J. Awwad, R. (2005), “Computational simulation of flow over stepped spillways”.
    Computers & structures, 83(27) 2215-2224.
  43. Thorwarth, J. (2008), “Hydraulisches Verhalten der Treppengerinne mit eingetieften Stufen—Selbstinduzierte
    Abflussinstationaritäten und Energiedissipation” [Hydraulics of pooled stepped spillways— Self-induced
    unsteady flow and energy dissipation]. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (in German).
  44. WeiLin, XU. ShuJing, LUO, QiuWen, ZH. Jing, LUO. (2015), “Experimental study on pressure and aeration
    characteristics in stepped chute flows. SCIENCE CHINA. Vol.58 No.4: 720–726. doi: 10.1007/s11431-015-
    5783-6.
  45. Xiangju, Ch. Yongcan, C. Lin, L. (2006), “Numerical simulation of air-water two-phase flow over stepped
    spillways”. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 49(6), 674-684.
  46. Zare, K.H. Doering, J.C. (2012), “Inception Point of Air Entrainment and Training Wall
    Characteristics of Baffles and Sills on Stepped Spillways”. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY
    .1943-7900.0000630.
  47. Zhan, J. Zhang, J. Gong, Y. (2016), “Numerical investigation of air-entrainment in skimming flow over stepped
    spillways”. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters. Volume 6. Pages 139–142.
  48. Zhang, G. Chanson, H. (2016), Hydraulics of the developing flow region of stepped spillways. II: Pressure and
    velocity fields. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 142(7).
  49. Zhenwei, M. Zhiyan, Zh. Tao, Zh. (2012), “Numerical Simulation of 3-D Flow Field of Spillway based on VOF
    Method”. Procedia Engineering, 28, 808-812.
  50. Zhi-yong, D. Hun-wei, L.J. (2006), “Numerical simulation of skimming flow over mild stepped channel”.
    Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 18(3) 367-371.
  51. ZhongDong, Q. XiaoQing, H. WenXin, H. António, A. (2009), “Numerical simulation and analysis of water
    flow over stepped spillways”. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52(7) 1958-1965.
원문보기
Fig. 1　 Layout of spillway tunnel

Experimental study and numerical simulation of hydraulic characteristics of ogee spillway tunnel

WU Jingxia1
, ZHANG Chunjin2,3
(1. Xi’an Water Conservancy Survey Design Institute, Xi’an　 710054, Shaanxi, China; 2. Key Laboratory of
Yellow River Sediment Research, M. W. R. , Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Zhengzhou　
450003, Henan, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic
Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing　 210098, Jiangsu, China)

수치 시뮬레이션을 통해 오지 여수로 터널의 수리적 특성 연구의 타당성을 탐색하기 위해 황하 Xiaolangdi 수질 관리 프로젝트의 2번 오지 여수로 터널을 연구 대상으로 취한 다음 오지의 수리 특성 설계 및 점검 홍수 수준 조건에서 여수로 터널은 RNG k-ε 난류 모델을 사용하여 배출 용량, 터널 크라운 잔류 공간, 단면 유속, 압전 수두, 유동 캐비테이션 수, 제트 흐름 범위 및 1 ∶ 40의 일반 수리 모델과 결합된 세굴 구덩이 깊이, 시뮬레이션 값과 실험 값 모두 비교됩니다.

연구결과 모의실험값이 실험값과 일치하여 오지 여수로터널의 수리적 특성을 수치모사를 통해 탐색할 수 있음을 확인하였다. 여수로터널 내부의 흐름은 안정적이고 터널 크라운 잔류 공간은 개방 흐름과 완전 흐름의 교대 흐름 패턴이 없는 25% 이상입니다.

체크 홍수 수위에서 시뮬레이션 값과 유량 계수의 실험 값은 모두 설계에서보다 높으므로 배출 용량은 홍수 제어 관련 설계 요구 사항을 충족할 수 있습니다. 오지 단면과 플립 단면의 유동 캐비테이션 수는 캐비테이션 손상이 발생할 가능성이 작기 때문에 캐비테이션 침식을 줄이기 위한 적절한 적절한 조치가 채택될 필요가 있습니다.

유압 모델의 고르지 않은 표면에 부압이 발생하면 표면 구조에 관련주의를 기울일 필요가 있습니다. 연구 결과는 여수로 터널의 설계 및 건설에 대한 관련 참고 및 이론적 근거를 제공할 수 있습니다.

Keywords

Xiaolangdi Water Control Project; ogee spillway tunnel; simulative calculation; hydraulic characteristics; turbulent
model

Fig. 1　 Layout of spillway tunnel
Fig. 1　 Layout of spillway tunnel
Fig. 4　 Hydraulic modeling
Fig. 4　 Hydraulic modeling
Fig. 6　 Sectional surface profile distributions
Fig. 6　 Sectional surface profile distributions
Fig. 7　 Comparison between simulated results and experimental results for flow velocity of section-cross
Fig. 7　 Comparison between simulated results and experimental results for flow velocity of section-cross

参考文献(References)

[1]　 谢省宗, 吴一红, 陈文学. 我国高坝泄洪消能新技术的研究和创
新[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(3): 324-336.
XIE Shengzong, WU Yihong, CHEN Wenxue. New technology and
innovation on flood discharge and energy dissipation of high dams in
China [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2016, 47( 3): 324-
336.
[2]　 刘嘉夫, 齐昕. 龙抬头水电站泄洪洞水力特性研究[ J]. 水利水
电技术, 2019, 50(2): 139-143.
LIU Jiafu, QI Xin. Study on hydraulic characteristics of ogee spillway
tunnel of hydropower station [ J]. Water Resources and Hydropower
Engineering, 2019, 50(2): 139-143.
[3]　 范灵, 张宏伟, 刘之平, 等. 明流泄洪洞布置形式对水力特性影
响的数值研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2009, 28(3): 126-131.
FAN Ling, ZHANG Hongwei, LIU Zhiping, et al. Numerical study
on hydraulic characteristic of free surface flow in spillway tunnel with
different configuration [ J ]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering,
2009, 28(3): 126-131.
[4]　 张春晋, 李永业, 孙西欢. 明流泄洪洞水力特性的二维数值模拟
与试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2016, 33(1): 54-60.
ZHANG Chunjin, LI Yongye, SUN Xihuan. Two-dimensional numerical simulation and experimental research of hydraulic characteristics
in spillway tunnel with free water surface [ J]. Journal of Yangtze
River Scientific Research Institute, 2016, 33(1): 54-60.
[5]　 徐国宾, 章环境, 刘昉, 等. 龙抬头泄洪洞水力特性的数值模拟
[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(1): 84-87.
XU Guobin, ZHANG Huanjing, LIU Fang, et al. Numerical simulation on hydraulic characteristic of high head ogee spillway tunnel [J].
Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2015, 32(1):
84-87.
[6]　 陈瑞华, 杨吉健, 马麟, 等. 小湾水电站泄洪洞洞身数值模拟
[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2017, 35(6): 488-494.
CHEN Ruihua, YANG Jijian, MA Lin, et al. Numerical simulation
of tunnel of Xiaowan Hydropower Station [ J]. Journal of Drainage
and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2017, 35(6): 488-494.
[7]　 翟保林, 刘亚坤. 高水头明流泄洪洞三维数值模拟[ J]. 水利与
建筑工程学报, 2017, 15(3): 31-34.
ZHAI Baolin, LIU Yakun. 3-D Numerical simulation of high water
head spillway tunnel with free surface [ J ]. Journal of Water
Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2017, 15(3): 31-34.
[8]　 姜 攀, 尹进步, 何武全, 等. 有压泄洪洞弯道压力特性数值模拟
与试验研究[J]. 水力发电, 2016, 42(2): 49-53.
JIANG Pan, YIN Jinbu, HE Wuquan, et al. Numerical simulation
and experimental research on pressure characteristic of curved section
of pressure spillway tunnel [J]. Water Power, 2016, 42(2): 49-53.
[9]　 邓 军, 许唯临, 雷军, 等. 高水头岸边泄洪洞水力特性的数值模
拟[J]. 水利学报, 2005(10): 1209-1212.
DENG Jun, XU Weilin, LEI Jun, et al. Numerical simulation of
hydraulic characteristics of high head spillway tunnel [J]. Journal of
Hydraulic Engineering, 2005(10): 1209-1212.
[10] 史晓薇, 王长新, 李琳. 高流速泄洪隧洞水力特性的三维数值模
拟[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2015, 38(6): 495-501.
SHI Xiaowei, WANG Changxin, LI Lin. Three dimensional numerical
simulation of hydraulic characteristics of spillway tunnel with high flow
velocity [ J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2015, 38
(6): 495-501.
[11] 叶茂, 伍平, 王波, 等. 泄洪洞掺气水流的数值模拟研究[J]. 水
力发电学报, 2014, 33(4): 105-110.
YE Mao, WU Ping, WANG Bo, et al. Numerical simulation of
aerated flow in hydraulic tunnel [ J ]. Journal of Hydroelectric
Engineering, 2014, 33(4): 105-110.
[12] 胡涛, 王均星, 杜少磊. 大流量泄洪洞掺气坎水力特性数值模拟
[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2014, 47(5): 615-620.
HU Tao, WANG Junxing, DU Shaolei. Numerical simulation of
hydraulic characteristics of aerators in spillway tunnel with large
discharge [J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2014, 47
(5): 615-620.
[13] 孙鹏飞, 姜哲, 崔维成, 等. 基于 CFD 的全海深载人潜水器直航
阻力性能研究[J]. 中国造船, 2019, 60(2): 77-87.
SUN Pengfei, JIANG Zhe, CUI Weicheng, et al. Numerical simulation of a full ocean depth manned submersible based on CFD method
[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2019, 60(2): 77-87.
[14] 宛鹏翔, 范俊, 韩省思, 等. 冲击射流流动换热超大涡模拟研究
[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(10): 2237-2247.
WAN Pengxiang, FAN Jun, HAN Xingsi, et al. Very-large eddy
simulation of impinging jet flow and heat transfer [ J]. Journal of
Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(10): 2237-2247.
[15] 李国杰, 黄萌, 陈斌. 基于 PISO 算法的非结构化网格 VOF 算法
[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2013, 34(3): 476-479.
LI Guojie, HUANG Meng, CHEN Bing. VOF method on unstructured
grid using PISO algorithm [ J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34(3): 476-479.
[16] 董玮, 何庆南, 梁武科, 等. 双蜗壳离心泵泵腔轴向宽度与流动

DONG Wei, HE Qingnan, LIANG Wuke, et al. Relationship
between axial width and flow characteristics of pump chamber in
double volute centrifugal pump [ J ]. Journal of Northwestern
Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(6): 1322-1329.
[17] 陈恺, 张震宇, 王同光, 等. 基于 CFD 的水平轴风力机叶尖小翼
增功研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(1): 272-278.
CHEN Kai, ZHANG Zhenyu, WANG Tongguang, et al. CFD-Based
power enhancement of winglets for horizontal-axis wind turbines [ J].
Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2021, 42(1): 272-278.
[18] 张志君, 金柱男, 辛相锦, 等. 基于 VOF 方法的湿式离合器润滑
油路 CFD 数值模拟[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41
(5): 716-722.
ZHANG Zhijun, JIN Zhunan, XIN Xiangjin, et al. VOF method
based CFD numerical simulation for wet clutch lubricating oil passage
[ J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2020, 41
(5): 716-722.
[19] 罗永钦, 刁明军, 何大明, 等. 高坝明流泄洪洞掺气减蚀三维数
值模拟分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(1): 110-116.
LUO Yongqin, DIAO Mingjun, HE Daming, et al. Numerical simulation of aeration and cavitation in high dam spillway tunnels [ J].
Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(1): 110-116.
[20] 许文海, 党彦, 李国栋, 等. 双洞式溢洪洞三维流动的数值模拟
[J]. 水力发电学报, 2007(1): 56-60.
XU Wenhai, DANG Yan, LI Guodong, et al. Three dimensional
numerical simulation of the bi-tunnel spillway flow [ J]. Journal of
Hydroelectric Engineering, 2007(1): 56-60.
[21] 李爱华, 王腾, 刘沛清. 溪洛渡坝区岩石河床冲刷过程数值模拟
[J]. 水力发电学报, 2012, 31(5): 154-158.
LI Aihua, WANG Teng, LIU Peiqing. Numerical simulation of rock
bed scour behind the dam of Xiluodu hydropower station [J]. Journal
of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2012, 31(5): 154-15

PDF View
Flow velocity profiles for canals with a depth of 3 m and flow velocities of 5–5.3 m/s.

Optimization Algorithms and Engineering: Recent Advances and Applications

Mahdi Feizbahr,1 Navid Tonekaboni,2Guang-Jun Jiang,3,4 and Hong-Xia Chen3,4Show moreAcademic Editor: Mohammad YazdiReceived08 Apr 2021Revised18 Jun 2021Accepted17 Jul 2021Published11 Aug 2021

Abstract

Vegetation along the river increases the roughness and reduces the average flow velocity, reduces flow energy, and changes the flow velocity profile in the cross section of the river. Many canals and rivers in nature are covered with vegetation during the floods. Canal’s roughness is strongly affected by plants and therefore it has a great effect on flow resistance during flood. Roughness resistance against the flow due to the plants depends on the flow conditions and plant, so the model should simulate the current velocity by considering the effects of velocity, depth of flow, and type of vegetation along the canal. Total of 48 models have been simulated to investigate the effect of roughness in the canal. The results indicated that, by enhancing the velocity, the effect of vegetation in decreasing the bed velocity is negligible, while when the current has lower speed, the effect of vegetation on decreasing the bed velocity is obviously considerable.


강의 식생은 거칠기를 증가시키고 평균 유속을 감소시키며, 유속 에너지를 감소시키고 강의 단면에서 유속 프로파일을 변경합니다. 자연의 많은 운하와 강은 홍수 동안 초목으로 덮여 있습니다. 운하의 조도는 식물의 영향을 많이 받으므로 홍수시 유동저항에 큰 영향을 미칩니다. 식물로 인한 흐름에 대한 거칠기 저항은 흐름 조건 및 식물에 따라 다르므로 모델은 유속, 흐름 깊이 및 운하를 따라 식생 유형의 영향을 고려하여 현재 속도를 시뮬레이션해야 합니다. 근관의 거칠기의 영향을 조사하기 위해 총 48개의 모델이 시뮬레이션되었습니다. 결과는 유속을 높임으로써 유속을 감소시키는 식생의 영향은 무시할 수 있는 반면, 해류가 더 낮은 유속일 때 유속을 감소시키는 식생의 영향은 분명히 상당함을 나타냈다.

1. Introduction

Considering the impact of each variable is a very popular field within the analytical and statistical methods and intelligent systems [1–14]. This can help research for better modeling considering the relation of variables or interaction of them toward reaching a better condition for the objective function in control and engineering [15–27]. Consequently, it is necessary to study the effects of the passive factors on the active domain [28–36]. Because of the effect of vegetation on reducing the discharge capacity of rivers [37], pruning plants was necessary to improve the condition of rivers. One of the important effects of vegetation in river protection is the action of roots, which cause soil consolidation and soil structure improvement and, by enhancing the shear strength of soil, increase the resistance of canal walls against the erosive force of water. The outer limbs of the plant increase the roughness of the canal walls and reduce the flow velocity and deplete the flow energy in vicinity of the walls. Vegetation by reducing the shear stress of the canal bed reduces flood discharge and sedimentation in the intervals between vegetation and increases the stability of the walls [38–41].

One of the main factors influencing the speed, depth, and extent of flood in this method is Manning’s roughness coefficient. On the other hand, soil cover [42], especially vegetation, is one of the most determining factors in Manning’s roughness coefficient. Therefore, it is expected that those seasonal changes in the vegetation of the region will play an important role in the calculated value of Manning’s roughness coefficient and ultimately in predicting the flood wave behavior [43–45]. The roughness caused by plants’ resistance to flood current depends on the flow and plant conditions. Flow conditions include depth and velocity of the plant, and plant conditions include plant type, hardness or flexibility, dimensions, density, and shape of the plant [46]. In general, the issue discussed in this research is the optimization of flood-induced flow in canals by considering the effect of vegetation-induced roughness. Therefore, the effect of plants on the roughness coefficient and canal transmission coefficient and in consequence the flow depth should be evaluated [47, 48].

Current resistance is generally known by its roughness coefficient. The equation that is mainly used in this field is Manning equation. The ratio of shear velocity to average current velocity  is another form of current resistance. The reason for using the  ratio is that it is dimensionless and has a strong theoretical basis. The reason for using Manning roughness coefficient is its pervasiveness. According to Freeman et al. [49], the Manning roughness coefficient for plants was calculated according to the Kouwen and Unny [50] method for incremental resistance. This method involves increasing the roughness for various surface and plant irregularities. Manning’s roughness coefficient has all the factors affecting the resistance of the canal. Therefore, the appropriate way to more accurately estimate this coefficient is to know the factors affecting this coefficient [51].

To calculate the flow rate, velocity, and depth of flow in canals as well as flood and sediment estimation, it is important to evaluate the flow resistance. To determine the flow resistance in open ducts, Manning, Chézy, and Darcy–Weisbach relations are used [52]. In these relations, there are parameters such as Manning’s roughness coefficient (n), Chézy roughness coefficient (C), and Darcy–Weisbach coefficient (f). All three of these coefficients are a kind of flow resistance coefficient that is widely used in the equations governing flow in rivers [53].

The three relations that express the relationship between the average flow velocity (V) and the resistance and geometric and hydraulic coefficients of the canal are as follows:where n, f, and c are Manning, Darcy–Weisbach, and Chézy coefficients, respectively. V = average flow velocity, R = hydraulic radius, Sf = slope of energy line, which in uniform flow is equal to the slope of the canal bed,  = gravitational acceleration, and Kn is a coefficient whose value is equal to 1 in the SI system and 1.486 in the English system. The coefficients of resistance in equations (1) to (3) are related as follows:

Based on the boundary layer theory, the flow resistance for rough substrates is determined from the following general relation:where f = Darcy–Weisbach coefficient of friction, y = flow depth, Ks = bed roughness size, and A = constant coefficient.

On the other hand, the relationship between the Darcy–Weisbach coefficient of friction and the shear velocity of the flow is as follows:

By using equation (6), equation (5) is converted as follows:

Investigation on the effect of vegetation arrangement on shear velocity of flow in laboratory conditions showed that, with increasing the shear Reynolds number (), the numerical value of the  ratio also increases; in other words the amount of roughness coefficient increases with a slight difference in the cases without vegetation, checkered arrangement, and cross arrangement, respectively [54].

Roughness in river vegetation is simulated in mathematical models with a variable floor slope flume by different densities and discharges. The vegetation considered submerged in the bed of the flume. Results showed that, with increasing vegetation density, canal roughness and flow shear speed increase and with increasing flow rate and depth, Manning’s roughness coefficient decreases. Factors affecting the roughness caused by vegetation include the effect of plant density and arrangement on flow resistance, the effect of flow velocity on flow resistance, and the effect of depth [45, 55].

One of the works that has been done on the effect of vegetation on the roughness coefficient is Darby [56] study, which investigates a flood wave model that considers all the effects of vegetation on the roughness coefficient. There are currently two methods for estimating vegetation roughness. One method is to add the thrust force effect to Manning’s equation [47, 57, 58] and the other method is to increase the canal bed roughness (Manning-Strickler coefficient) [45, 59–61]. These two methods provide acceptable results in models designed to simulate floodplain flow. Wang et al. [62] simulate the floodplain with submerged vegetation using these two methods and to increase the accuracy of the results, they suggested using the effective height of the plant under running water instead of using the actual height of the plant. Freeman et al. [49] provided equations for determining the coefficient of vegetation roughness under different conditions. Lee et al. [63] proposed a method for calculating the Manning coefficient using the flow velocity ratio at different depths. Much research has been done on the Manning roughness coefficient in rivers, and researchers [49, 63–66] sought to obtain a specific number for n to use in river engineering. However, since the depth and geometric conditions of rivers are completely variable in different places, the values of Manning roughness coefficient have changed subsequently, and it has not been possible to choose a fixed number. In river engineering software, the Manning roughness coefficient is determined only for specific and constant conditions or normal flow. Lee et al. [63] stated that seasonal conditions, density, and type of vegetation should also be considered. Hydraulic roughness and Manning roughness coefficient n of the plant were obtained by estimating the total Manning roughness coefficient from the matching of the measured water surface curve and water surface height. The following equation is used for the flow surface curve:where  is the depth of water change, S0 is the slope of the canal floor, Sf is the slope of the energy line, and Fr is the Froude number which is obtained from the following equation:where D is the characteristic length of the canal. Flood flow velocity is one of the important parameters of flood waves, which is very important in calculating the water level profile and energy consumption. In the cases where there are many limitations for researchers due to the wide range of experimental dimensions and the variety of design parameters, the use of numerical methods that are able to estimate the rest of the unknown results with acceptable accuracy is economically justified.

FLOW-3D software uses Finite Difference Method (FDM) for numerical solution of two-dimensional and three-dimensional flow. This software is dedicated to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and is provided by Flow Science [67]. The flow is divided into networks with tubular cells. For each cell there are values of dependent variables and all variables are calculated in the center of the cell, except for the velocity, which is calculated at the center of the cell. In this software, two numerical techniques have been used for geometric simulation, FAVOR™ (Fractional-Area-Volume-Obstacle-Representation) and the VOF (Volume-of-Fluid) method. The equations used at this model for this research include the principle of mass survival and the magnitude of motion as follows. The fluid motion equations in three dimensions, including the Navier–Stokes equations with some additional terms, are as follows:where  are mass accelerations in the directions x, y, z and  are viscosity accelerations in the directions x, y, z and are obtained from the following equations:

Shear stresses  in equation (11) are obtained from the following equations:

The standard model is used for high Reynolds currents, but in this model, RNG theory allows the analytical differential formula to be used for the effective viscosity that occurs at low Reynolds numbers. Therefore, the RNG model can be used for low and high Reynolds currents.

Weather changes are high and this affects many factors continuously. The presence of vegetation in any area reduces the velocity of surface flows and prevents soil erosion, so vegetation will have a significant impact on reducing destructive floods. One of the methods of erosion protection in floodplain watersheds is the use of biological methods. The presence of vegetation in watersheds reduces the flow rate during floods and prevents soil erosion. The external organs of plants increase the roughness and decrease the velocity of water flow and thus reduce its shear stress energy. One of the important factors with which the hydraulic resistance of plants is expressed is the roughness coefficient. Measuring the roughness coefficient of plants and investigating their effect on reducing velocity and shear stress of flow is of special importance.

Roughness coefficients in canals are affected by two main factors, namely, flow conditions and vegetation characteristics [68]. So far, much research has been done on the effect of the roughness factor created by vegetation, but the issue of plant density has received less attention. For this purpose, this study was conducted to investigate the effect of vegetation density on flow velocity changes.

In a study conducted using a software model on three density modes in the submerged state effect on flow velocity changes in 48 different modes was investigated (Table 1).Table 1 The studied models.

The number of cells used in this simulation is equal to 1955888 cells. The boundary conditions were introduced to the model as a constant speed and depth (Figure 1). At the output boundary, due to the presence of supercritical current, no parameter for the current is considered. Absolute roughness for floors and walls was introduced to the model (Figure 1). In this case, the flow was assumed to be nonviscous and air entry into the flow was not considered. After  seconds, this model reached a convergence accuracy of .

Figure 1 The simulated model and its boundary conditions.

Due to the fact that it is not possible to model the vegetation in FLOW-3D software, in this research, the vegetation of small soft plants was studied so that Manning’s coefficients can be entered into the canal bed in the form of roughness coefficients obtained from the studies of Chow [69] in similar conditions. In practice, in such modeling, the effect of plant height is eliminated due to the small height of herbaceous plants, and modeling can provide relatively acceptable results in these conditions.

48 models with input velocities proportional to the height of the regular semihexagonal canal were considered to create supercritical conditions. Manning coefficients were applied based on Chow [69] studies in order to control the canal bed. Speed profiles were drawn and discussed.

Any control and simulation system has some inputs that we should determine to test any technology [70–77]. Determination and true implementation of such parameters is one of the key steps of any simulation [23, 78–81] and computing procedure [82–86]. The input current is created by applying the flow rate through the VFR (Volume Flow Rate) option and the output flow is considered Output and for other borders the Symmetry option is considered.

Simulation of the models and checking their action and responses and observing how a process behaves is one of the accepted methods in engineering and science [87, 88]. For verification of FLOW-3D software, the results of computer simulations are compared with laboratory measurements and according to the values of computational error, convergence error, and the time required for convergence, the most appropriate option for real-time simulation is selected (Figures 2 and 3 ).

Figure 2 Modeling the plant with cylindrical tubes at the bottom of the canal.

Figure 3 Velocity profiles in positions 2 and 5.

The canal is 7 meters long, 0.5 meters wide, and 0.8 meters deep. This test was used to validate the application of the software to predict the flow rate parameters. In this experiment, instead of using the plant, cylindrical pipes were used in the bottom of the canal.

The conditions of this modeling are similar to the laboratory conditions and the boundary conditions used in the laboratory were used for numerical modeling. The critical flow enters the simulation model from the upstream boundary, so in the upstream boundary conditions, critical velocity and depth are considered. The flow at the downstream boundary is supercritical, so no parameters are applied to the downstream boundary.

The software well predicts the process of changing the speed profile in the open canal along with the considered obstacles. The error in the calculated speed values can be due to the complexity of the flow and the interaction of the turbulence caused by the roughness of the floor with the turbulence caused by the three-dimensional cycles in the hydraulic jump. As a result, the software is able to predict the speed distribution in open canals.

2. Modeling Results

After analyzing the models, the results were shown in graphs (Figures 4–14 ). The total number of experiments in this study was 48 due to the limitations of modeling.(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(d)
(d)(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(d)
(d)Figure 4 Flow velocity profiles for canals with a depth of 1 m and flow velocities of 3–3.3 m/s. Canal with a depth of 1 meter and a flow velocity of (a) 3 meters per second, (b) 3.1 meters per second, (c) 3.2 meters per second, and (d) 3.3 meters per second.

Figure 5 Canal diagram with a depth of 1 meter and a flow rate of 3 meters per second.

Figure 6 Canal diagram with a depth of 1 meter and a flow rate of 3.1 meters per second.

Figure 7 Canal diagram with a depth of 1 meter and a flow rate of 3.2 meters per second.

Figure 8 Canal diagram with a depth of 1 meter and a flow rate of 3.3 meters per second.(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(d)
(d)(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(d)
(d)Figure 9 Flow velocity profiles for canals with a depth of 2 m and flow velocities of 4–4.3 m/s. Canal with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of (a) 4 meters per second, (b) 4.1 meters per second, (c) 4.2 meters per second, and (d) 4.3 meters per second.

Figure 10 Canal diagram with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of 4 meters per second.

Figure 11 Canal diagram with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of 4.1 meters per second.

Figure 12 Canal diagram with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of 4.2 meters per second.

Figure 13 Canal diagram with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of 4.3 meters per second.(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(d)
(d)(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(d)
(d)Figure 14 Flow velocity profiles for canals with a depth of 3 m and flow velocities of 5–5.3 m/s. Canal with a depth of 2 meters and a flow rate of (a) 4 meters per second, (b) 4.1 meters per second, (c) 4.2 meters per second, and (d) 4.3 meters per second.

To investigate the effects of roughness with flow velocity, the trend of flow velocity changes at different depths and with supercritical flow to a Froude number proportional to the depth of the section has been obtained.

According to the velocity profiles of Figure 5, it can be seen that, with the increasing of Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases.

According to Figures 5 to 8, it can be found that, with increasing the Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the models 1 to 12, which can be justified by increasing the speed and of course increasing the Froude number.

According to Figure 10, we see that, with increasing Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases.

According to Figure 11, we see that, with increasing Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of Figures 5–10, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

With increasing Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases (Figure 12). But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the higher models (Figures 5–8 and 10, 11), which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

According to Figure 13, with increasing Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of Figures 5 to 12, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

According to Figure 15, with increasing Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases.

Figure 15 Canal diagram with a depth of 3 meters and a flow rate of 5 meters per second.

According to Figure 16, with increasing Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the higher model, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

Figure 16 Canal diagram with a depth of 3 meters and a flow rate of 5.1 meters per second.

According to Figure 17, it is clear that, with increasing Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the higher models, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

Figure 17 Canal diagram with a depth of 3 meters and a flow rate of 5.2 meters per second.

According to Figure 18, with increasing Manning’s coefficient, the canal bed speed decreases. But this deceleration is more noticeable than the deceleration of the higher models, which can be justified by increasing the speed and, of course, increasing the Froude number.

Figure 18 Canal diagram with a depth of 3 meters and a flow rate of 5.3 meters per second.

According to Figure 19, it can be seen that the vegetation placed in front of the flow input velocity has negligible effect on the reduction of velocity, which of course can be justified due to the flexibility of the vegetation. The only unusual thing is the unexpected decrease in floor speed of 3 m/s compared to higher speeds.(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)Figure 19 Comparison of velocity profiles with the same plant densities (depth 1 m). Comparison of velocity profiles with (a) plant densities of 25%, depth 1 m; (b) plant densities of 50%, depth 1 m; and (c) plant densities of 75%, depth 1 m.

According to Figure 20, by increasing the speed of vegetation, the effect of vegetation on reducing the flow rate becomes more noticeable. And the role of input current does not have much effect in reducing speed.(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)Figure 20 Comparison of velocity profiles with the same plant densities (depth 2 m). Comparison of velocity profiles with (a) plant densities of 25%, depth 2 m; (b) plant densities of 50%, depth 2 m; and (c) plant densities of 75%, depth 2 m.

According to Figure 21, it can be seen that, with increasing speed, the effect of vegetation on reducing the bed flow rate becomes more noticeable and the role of the input current does not have much effect. In general, it can be seen that, by increasing the speed of the input current, the slope of the profiles increases from the bed to the water surface and due to the fact that, in software, the roughness coefficient applies to the channel floor only in the boundary conditions, this can be perfectly justified. Of course, it can be noted that, due to the flexible conditions of the vegetation of the bed, this modeling can show acceptable results for such grasses in the canal floor. In the next directions, we may try application of swarm-based optimization methods for modeling and finding the most effective factors in this research [2, 7, 8, 15, 18, 89–94]. In future, we can also apply the simulation logic and software of this research for other domains such as power engineering [95–99].(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)(a)
(a)(b)
(b)(c)
(c)Figure 21 Comparison of velocity profiles with the same plant densities (depth 3 m). Comparison of velocity profiles with (a) plant densities of 25%, depth 3 m; (b) plant densities of 50%, depth 3 m; and (c) plant densities of 75%, depth 3 m.

3. Conclusion

The effects of vegetation on the flood canal were investigated by numerical modeling with FLOW-3D software. After analyzing the results, the following conclusions were reached:(i)Increasing the density of vegetation reduces the velocity of the canal floor but has no effect on the velocity of the canal surface.(ii)Increasing the Froude number is directly related to increasing the speed of the canal floor.(iii)In the canal with a depth of one meter, a sudden increase in speed can be observed from the lowest speed and higher speed, which is justified by the sudden increase in Froude number.(iv)As the inlet flow rate increases, the slope of the profiles from the bed to the water surface increases.(v)By reducing the Froude number, the effect of vegetation on reducing the flow bed rate becomes more noticeable. And the input velocity in reducing the velocity of the canal floor does not have much effect.(vi)At a flow rate between 3 and 3.3 meters per second due to the shallow depth of the canal and the higher landing number a more critical area is observed in which the flow bed velocity in this area is between 2.86 and 3.1 m/s.(vii)Due to the critical flow velocity and the slight effect of the roughness of the horseshoe vortex floor, it is not visible and is only partially observed in models 1-2-3 and 21.(viii)As the flow rate increases, the effect of vegetation on the rate of bed reduction decreases.(ix)In conditions where less current intensity is passing, vegetation has a greater effect on reducing current intensity and energy consumption increases.(x)In the case of using the flow rate of 0.8 cubic meters per second, the velocity distribution and flow regime show about 20% more energy consumption than in the case of using the flow rate of 1.3 cubic meters per second.

Nomenclature

n:Manning’s roughness coefficient
C:Chézy roughness coefficient
f:Darcy–Weisbach coefficient
V:Flow velocity
R:Hydraulic radius
g:Gravitational acceleration
y:Flow depth
Ks:Bed roughness
A:Constant coefficient
:Reynolds number
∂y/∂x:Depth of water change
S0:Slope of the canal floor
Sf:Slope of energy line
Fr:Froude number
D:Characteristic length of the canal
G:Mass acceleration
:Shear stresses.

Data Availability

All data are included within the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Contract no. 71761030 and Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia under Contract no. 2019LH07003.

References

  1. H. Yu, L. Jie, W. Gui et al., “Dynamic Gaussian bare-bones fruit fly optimizers with abandonment mechanism: method and analysis,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 20, pp. 1–29, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. X. Zhao, D. Li, B. Yang, C. Ma, Y. Zhu, and H. Chen, “Feature selection based on improved ant colony optimization for online detection of foreign fiber in cotton,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 24, pp. 585–596, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Hu, H. Chen, A. A. Heidari et al., “Orthogonal learning covariance matrix for defects of grey wolf optimizer: insights, balance, diversity, and feature selection,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 213, Article ID 106684, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Yu, M. Chen, K. Chen et al., “SGOA: annealing-behaved grasshopper optimizer for global tasks,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 4, pp. 1–28, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Shan, Z. Qiao, A. A. Heidari, H. Chen, H. Turabieh, and Y. Teng, “Double adaptive weights for stabilization of moth flame optimizer: balance analysis, engineering cases, and medical diagnosis,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 8, Article ID 106728, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Tu, H. Chen, J. Liu et al., “Evolutionary biogeography-based whale optimization methods with communication structure: towards measuring the balance,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 212, Article ID 106642, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Zhang, R. Liu, X. Wang et al., “Towards augmented kernel extreme learning models for bankruptcy prediction: algorithmic behavior and comprehensive analysis,” Neurocomputing, vol. 430, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  8. H.-L. Chen, G. Wang, C. Ma, Z.-N. Cai, W.-B. Liu, and S.-J. Wang, “An efficient hybrid kernel extreme learning machine approach for early diagnosis of Parkinson׳s disease,” Neurocomputing, vol. 184, pp. 131–144, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Xia, H. Chen, Q. Li et al., “Ultrasound-based differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid Nodules: an extreme learning machine approach,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 147, pp. 37–49, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Li, L. Hou, B. Y. Sharma et al., “Developing a new intelligent system for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 153, pp. 211–225, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. Xu and H.-L. Chen, “Adaptive computational chemotaxis based on field in bacterial foraging optimization,” Soft Computing, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 797–807, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Wang, H. Chen, B. Yang et al., “Toward an optimal kernel extreme learning machine using a chaotic moth-flame optimization strategy with applications in medical diagnoses,” Neurocomputing, vol. 267, pp. 69–84, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Chao, K. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Zhu, J. Wang, and Z. Yu, “Geographically weighted regression based methods for merging satellite and gauge precipitation,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 558, pp. 275–289, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. J. Golrokh, G. Azeem, and A. Hasan, “Eco-efficiency evaluation in cement industries: DEA malmquist productivity index using optimization models,” ENG Transactions, vol. 1, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  15. D. Zhao, L. Lei, F. Yu et al., “Chaotic random spare ant colony optimization for multi-threshold image segmentation of 2D Kapur entropy,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 8, Article ID 106510, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  16. Y. Zhang, R. Liu, X. Wang, H. Chen, and C. Li, “Boosted binary Harris hawks optimizer and feature selection,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 517, pp. 1–30, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Hu, G. Hong, J. Ma, X. Wang, and H. Chen, “An efficient machine learning approach for diagnosis of paraquat-poisoned patients,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 59, pp. 116–124, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Shen, H. Chen, Z. Yu et al., “Evolving support vector machines using fruit fly optimization for medical data classification,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 96, pp. 61–75, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. X. Zhao, X. Zhang, Z. Cai et al., “Chaos enhanced grey wolf optimization wrapped ELM for diagnosis of paraquat-poisoned patients,” Computational Biology and Chemistry, vol. 78, pp. 481–490, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. Xu, H. Chen, J. Luo, Q. Zhang, S. Jiao, and X. Zhang, “Enhanced Moth-flame optimizer with mutation strategy for global optimization,” Information Sciences, vol. 492, pp. 181–203, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Wang and H. Chen, “Chaotic multi-swarm whale optimizer boosted support vector machine for medical diagnosis,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 88, Article ID 105946, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Chen, J. Li, H. Lu, and P. Yan, “Coupling system dynamics analysis and risk aversion programming for optimizing the mixed noise-driven shale gas-water supply chains,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 278, Article ID 123209, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  23. H. Tang, Y. Xu, A. Lin et al., “Predicting green consumption behaviors of students using efficient firefly grey wolf-assisted K-nearest neighbor classifiers,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 35546–35562, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H.-J. Ma and G.-H. Yang, “Adaptive fault tolerant control of cooperative heterogeneous systems with actuator faults and unreliable interconnections,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 3240–3255, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
  25. H.-J. Ma and L.-X. Xu, “Decentralized adaptive fault-tolerant control for a class of strong interconnected nonlinear systems via graph theory,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 66, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  26. H. J. Ma, L. X. Xu, and G. H. Yang, “Multiple environment integral reinforcement learning-based fault-tolerant control for affine nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 51, pp. 1–16, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Hu, M. Wang, C. Zhao, Q. Pan, and C. Du, “Formation control and collision avoidance for multi-UAV systems based on Voronoi partition,” Science China Technological Sciences, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Qian, C. Chen, and X. Zhou, “Locality-constrained discriminative matrix regression for robust face identification,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 99, pp. 1–15, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. X. Zhang, D. Wang, Z. Zhou, and Y. Ma, “Robust low-rank tensor recovery with rectification and alignment,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 238–255, 2019.View at: Google Scholar
  30. X. Zhang, J. Wang, T. Wang, R. Jiang, J. Xu, and L. Zhao, “Robust feature learning for adversarial defense via hierarchical feature alignment,” Information Sciences, vol. 560, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  31. X. Zhang, R. Jiang, T. Wang, and J. Wang, “Recursive neural network for video deblurring,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 03, p. 1, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. X. Zhang, T. Wang, J. Wang, G. Tang, and L. Zhao, “Pyramid channel-based feature attention network for image dehazing,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 197-198, Article ID 103003, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Zhang, T. Wang, W. Luo, and P. Huang, “Multi-level fusion and attention-guided CNN for image dehazing,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 3, p. 1, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. He, J. Shen, and Y. Zhang, “Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 206, pp. 1115–1125, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Chen, W. Zheng, W. Li, and Y. Huang, “Large group Activity security risk assessment and risk early warning based on random forest algorithm,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 144, pp. 1–5, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Hu, H. Zhang, Z. Li, C. Zhao, Z. Xu, and Q. Pan, “Object traversing by monocular UAV in outdoor environment,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 25, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  37. P. Tian, H. Lu, W. Feng, Y. Guan, and Y. Xue, “Large decrease in streamflow and sediment load of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau driven by future climate change: a case study in Lhasa River Basin,” Catena, vol. 187, Article ID 104340, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Stokes, C. Atger, A. G. Bengough, T. Fourcaud, and R. C. Sidle, “Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides,” Plant and Soil, vol. 324, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. B. Devi, A. Sharma, and B. Kumar, “Studies on emergent flow over vegetative channel bed with downward seepage,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 408–420, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
  40. G. Ireland, M. Volpi, and G. Petropoulos, “Examining the capability of supervised machine learning classifiers in extracting flooded areas from Landsat TM imagery: a case study from a Mediterranean flood,” Remote Sensing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 3372–3399, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Goodarzi and S. Javadi, “Assessment of aquifer vulnerability using the DRASTIC model; a case study of the Dezful-Andimeshk Aquifer,” Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
  42. K. Zhang, Q. Wang, L. Chao et al., “Ground observation-based analysis of soil moisture spatiotemporal variability across a humid to semi-humid transitional zone in China,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 574, pp. 903–914, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. De Doncker, P. Troch, R. Verhoeven, K. Bal, P. Meire, and J. Quintelier, “Determination of the Manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza river,” Environmental Fluid Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 549–567, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Fathi-Moghadam and K. Drikvandi, “Manning roughness coefficient for rivers and flood plains with non-submerged vegetation,” International Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
  45. F.-C. Wu, H. W. Shen, and Y.-J. Chou, “Variation of roughness coefficients for unsubmerged and submerged vegetation,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 934–942, 1999.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. K. Wood, “Rangeland vegetation-hydrologic interactions,” in Vegetation Science Applications for Rangeland Analysis and Management, vol. 3, pp. 469–491, Springer, 1988.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Wilson, O. Yagci, H.-P. Rauch, and N. Olsen, “3D numerical modelling of a willow vegetated river/floodplain system,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 327, no. 1-2, pp. 13–21, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. Yazarloo, M. Khamehchian, and M. R. Nikoodel, “Observational-computational 3d engineering geological model and geotechnical characteristics of young sediments of golestan province,” Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering (CRPASE), vol. 03, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
  49. G. E. Freeman, W. H. Rahmeyer, and R. R. Copeland, “Determination of resistance due to shrubs and woody vegetation,” International Journal of River Basin Management, vol. 19, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
  50. N. Kouwen and T. E. Unny, “Flexible roughness in open channels,” Journal of the Hydraulics Division, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 713–728, 1973.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Hosseini and J. Abrishami, Open Channel Hydraulics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2007.
  52. C. S. James, A. L. Birkhead, A. A. Jordanova, and J. J. O’Sullivan, “Flow resistance of emergent vegetation,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 390–398, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. F. Huthoff and D. Augustijn, “Channel roughness in 1D steady uniform flow: Manning or Chézy?,,” NCR-days, vol. 102, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
  54. M. S. Sabegh, M. Saneie, M. Habibi, A. A. Abbasi, and M. Ghadimkhani, “Experimental investigation on the effect of river bank tree planting array, on shear velocity,” Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, vol. 2, no. 4, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
  55. A. Errico, V. Pasquino, M. Maxwald, G. B. Chirico, L. Solari, and F. Preti, “The effect of flexible vegetation on flow in drainage channels: estimation of roughness coefficients at the real scale,” Ecological Engineering, vol. 120, pp. 411–421, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. E. Darby, “Effect of riparian vegetation on flow resistance and flood potential,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 443–454, 1999.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. V. Kutija and H. Thi Minh Hong, “A numerical model for assessing the additional resistance to flow introduced by flexible vegetation,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 99–114, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. Fischer-Antze, T. Stoesser, P. Bates, and N. R. B. Olsen, “3D numerical modelling of open-channel flow with submerged vegetation,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 303–310, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. U. Stephan and D. Gutknecht, “Hydraulic resistance of submerged flexible vegetation,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 269, no. 1-2, pp. 27–43, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. F. G. Carollo, V. Ferro, and D. Termini, “Flow resistance law in channels with flexible submerged vegetation,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 554–564, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. W. Fu-sheng, “Flow resistance of flexible vegetation in open channel,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. S1, 2007.View at: Google Scholar
  62. P.-f. Wang, C. Wang, and D. Z. Zhu, “Hydraulic resistance of submerged vegetation related to effective height,” Journal of Hydrodynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 265–273, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. K. Lee, L. C. Roig, H. L. Jenter, and H. M. Visser, “Drag coefficients for modeling flow through emergent vegetation in the Florida Everglades,” Ecological Engineering, vol. 22, no. 4-5, pp. 237–248, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. G. J. Arcement and V. R. Schneider, Guide for Selecting Manning’s Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
  65. Y. Ding and S. S. Y. Wang, “Identification of Manning’s roughness coefficients in channel network using adjoint analysis,” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. E. T. Engman, “Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff,” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 39–53, 1986.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Feizbahr, C. Kok Keong, F. Rostami, and M. Shahrokhi, “Wave energy dissipation using perforated and non perforated piles,” International Journal of Engineering, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 212–219, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. Farzadkhoo, A. Keshavarzi, H. Hamidifar, and M. Javan, “Sudden pollutant discharge in vegetated compound meandering rivers,” Catena, vol. 182, Article ID 104155, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. V. T. Chow, Open-channel Hydraulics, Mcgraw-Hill Civil Engineering Series, Chennai, TN, India, 1959.
  70. X. Zhang, R. Jing, Z. Li, Z. Li, X. Chen, and C.-Y. Su, “Adaptive pseudo inverse control for a class of nonlinear asymmetric and saturated nonlinear hysteretic systems,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 916–928, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  71. C. Zuo, Q. Chen, L. Tian, L. Waller, and A. Asundi, “Transport of intensity phase retrieval and computational imaging for partially coherent fields: the phase space perspective,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 71, pp. 20–32, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. C. Zuo, J. Sun, J. Li, J. Zhang, A. Asundi, and Q. Chen, “High-resolution transport-of-intensity quantitative phase microscopy with annular illumination,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7654–7722, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. B.-H. Li, Y. Liu, A.-M. Zhang, W.-H. Wang, and S. Wan, “A survey on blocking technology of entity resolution,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 769–793, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. Y. Liu, B. Zhang, Y. Feng et al., “Development of 340-GHz transceiver front end based on GaAs monolithic integration technology for THz active imaging array,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 21, p. 7924, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. Hu, H. Zhang, L. Liu, X. Zhu, C. Zhao, and Q. Pan, “Convergent multiagent formation control with collision avoidance,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1805–1818, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. B. Movahhed, J. Ayoubinejad, F. N. Asl, and M. Feizbahr, “The effect of rain on pedestrians crossing speed,” Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering (CRPASE), vol. 6, no. 3, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  77. A. Li, D. Spano, J. Krivochiza et al., “A tutorial on interference exploitation via symbol-level precoding: overview, state-of-the-art and future directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 796–839, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. W. Zhu, C. Ma, X. Zhao et al., “Evaluation of sino foreign cooperative education project using orthogonal sine cosine optimized kernel extreme learning machine,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 61107–61123, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. G. Liu, W. Jia, M. Wang et al., “Predicting cervical hyperextension injury: a covariance guided sine cosine support vector machine,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 46895–46908, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. Y. Wei, H. Lv, M. Chen et al., “Predicting entrepreneurial intention of students: an extreme learning machine with Gaussian barebone harris hawks optimizer,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 76841–76855, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. Lin, Q. Wu, A. A. Heidari et al., “Predicting intentions of students for master programs using a chaos-induced sine cosine-based fuzzy K-Nearest neighbor classifier,” Ieee Access, vol. 7, pp. 67235–67248, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Y. Fan, P. Wang, A. A. Heidari et al., “Rationalized fruit fly optimization with sine cosine algorithm: a comprehensive analysis,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 157, Article ID 113486, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. E. Rodríguez-Esparza, L. A. Zanella-Calzada, D. Oliva et al., “An efficient Harris hawks-inspired image segmentation method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 155, Article ID 113428, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. Jiao, G. Chong, C. Huang et al., “Orthogonally adapted Harris hawks optimization for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models,” Energy, vol. 203, Article ID 117804, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. Z. Xu, Z. Hu, A. A. Heidari et al., “Orthogonally-designed adapted grasshopper optimization: a comprehensive analysis,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 150, Article ID 113282, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. A. Abbassi, R. Abbassi, A. A. Heidari et al., “Parameters identification of photovoltaic cell models using enhanced exploratory salp chains-based approach,” Energy, vol. 198, Article ID 117333, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. M. Mahmoodi and K. K. Aminjan, “Numerical simulation of flow through sukhoi 24 air inlet,” Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering (CRPASE), vol. 03, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
  88. F. J. Golrokh and A. Hasan, “A comparison of machine learning clustering algorithms based on the DEA optimization approach for pharmaceutical companies in developing countries,” ENG Transactions, vol. 1, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
  89. H. Chen, A. A. Heidari, H. Chen, M. Wang, Z. Pan, and A. H. Gandomi, “Multi-population differential evolution-assisted Harris hawks optimization: framework and case studies,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 111, pp. 175–198, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. J. Guo, H. Zheng, B. Li, and G.-Z. Fu, “Bayesian hierarchical model-based information fusion for degradation analysis considering non-competing relationship,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 175222–175227, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. J. Guo, H. Zheng, B. Li, and G.-Z. Fu, “A Bayesian approach for degradation analysis with individual differences,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 175033–175040, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. M. A. Malakoutian, Y. Malakoutian, P. Mostafapour, and S. Z. D. Abed, “Prediction for monthly rainfall of six meteorological regions and TRNC (case study: north Cyprus),” ENG Transactions, vol. 2, no. 2, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
  93. H. Arslan, M. Ranjbar, and Z. Mutlum, “Maximum sound transmission loss in multi-chamber reactive silencers: are two chambers enough?,,” ENG Transactions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
  94. N. Tonekaboni, M. Feizbahr, N. Tonekaboni, G.-J. Jiang, and H.-X. Chen, “Optimization of solar CCHP systems with collector enhanced by porous media and nanofluid,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2021, Article ID 9984840, 12 pages, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Z. Niu, B. Zhang, J. Wang et al., “The research on 220GHz multicarrier high-speed communication system,” China Communications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 131–139, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. B. Zhang, Z. Niu, J. Wang et al., “Four‐hundred gigahertz broadband multi‐branch waveguide coupler,” IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1175–1179, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. Z.-Q. Niu, L. Yang, B. Zhang et al., “A mechanical reliability study of 3dB waveguide hybrid couplers in the submillimeter and terahertz band,” Journal of Zhejiang University Science, vol. 1, no. 1, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
  98. B. Zhang, D. Ji, D. Fang, S. Liang, Y. Fan, and X. Chen, “A novel 220-GHz GaN diode on-chip tripler with high driven power,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 780–783, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. M. Taleghani and A. Taleghani, “Identification and ranking of factors affecting the implementation of knowledge management engineering based on TOPSIS technique,” ENG Transactions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
Fig. 1. Hydraulic jump flow structure.

Performance assessment of OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D in the numerical modeling of a low Reynolds number hydraulic jump

낮은 레이놀즈 수 유압 점프의 수치 모델링에서 OpenFOAM 및 FLOW-3D의 성능 평가

ArnauBayona DanielValerob RafaelGarcía-Bartuala Francisco ​JoséVallés-Morána P. AmparoLópez-Jiméneza

Abstract

A comparative performance analysis of the CFD platforms OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D is presented, focusing on a 3D swirling turbulent flow: a steady hydraulic jump at low Reynolds number. Turbulence is treated using RANS approach RNG k-ε. A Volume Of Fluid (VOF) method is used to track the air–water interface, consequently aeration is modeled using an Eulerian–Eulerian approach. Structured meshes of cubic elements are used to discretize the channel geometry. The numerical model accuracy is assessed comparing representative hydraulic jump variables (sequent depth ratio, roller length, mean velocity profiles, velocity decay or free surface profile) to experimental data. The model results are also compared to previous studies to broaden the result validation. Both codes reproduced the phenomenon under study concurring with experimental data, although special care must be taken when swirling flows occur. Both models can be used to reproduce the hydraulic performance of energy dissipation structures at low Reynolds numbers.

CFD 플랫폼 OpenFOAM 및 FLOW-3D의 비교 성능 분석이 3D 소용돌이치는 난류인 낮은 레이놀즈 수에서 안정적인 유압 점프에 초점을 맞춰 제시됩니다. 난류는 RANS 접근법 RNG k-ε을 사용하여 처리됩니다.

VOF(Volume Of Fluid) 방법은 공기-물 계면을 추적하는 데 사용되며 결과적으로 Eulerian-Eulerian 접근 방식을 사용하여 폭기가 모델링됩니다. 입방체 요소의 구조화된 메쉬는 채널 형상을 이산화하는 데 사용됩니다. 수치 모델 정확도는 대표적인 유압 점프 변수(연속 깊이 비율, 롤러 길이, 평균 속도 프로파일, 속도 감쇠 또는 자유 표면 프로파일)를 실험 데이터와 비교하여 평가됩니다.

모델 결과는 또한 결과 검증을 확장하기 위해 이전 연구와 비교됩니다. 소용돌이 흐름이 발생할 때 특별한 주의가 필요하지만 두 코드 모두 실험 데이터와 일치하는 연구 중인 현상을 재현했습니다. 두 모델 모두 낮은 레이놀즈 수에서 에너지 소산 구조의 수리 성능을 재현하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다.

Keywords

CFDRANS, OpenFOAM, FLOW-3D ,Hydraulic jump, Air–water flow, Low Reynolds number

PDF View

References

Ahmed, F., Rajaratnam, N., 1997. Three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers: a
review. J. Hydraulic Res. 35 (1), 81e98.
Ashgriz, N., Poo, J., 1991. FLAIR: Flux line-segment model for advection and interface
reconstruction. Elsevier J. Comput. Phys. 93 (2), 449e468.
Bakhmeteff, B.A., Matzke, A.E., 1936. .The hydraulic jump in terms dynamic similarity. ASCE Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 101 (1), 630e647.
Balachandar, S., Eaton, J.K., 2010. Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annu. Rev.
Fluid Mech. 42 (2010), 111e133.
Bayon, A., Lopez-Jimenez, P.A., 2015. Numerical analysis of hydraulic jumps using

OpenFOAM. J. Hydroinformatics 17 (4), 662e678.
Belanger, J., 1841. Notes surl’Hydraulique, Ecole Royale des Ponts et Chaussees
(Paris, France).
Bennett, N.D., Crok, B.F.W., Guariso, G., Guillaume, J.H.A., Hamilton, S.H.,
Jakeman, A.J., Marsili-Libelli, S., Newhama, L.T.H., Norton, J.P., Perrin, C.,
Pierce, S.A., Robson, B., Seppelt, R., Voinov, A.A., Fath, B.D., Andreassian, V., 2013.
Characterising performance of environmental models. Environ. Model. Softw.
40, 1e20.
Berberovic, E., 2010. Investigation of Free-surface Flow Associated with Drop
Impact: Numerical Simulations and Theoretical Modeling. Imperial College of
Science, Technology and Medicine, UK.
Bidone, G., 1819. Report to Academie Royale des Sciences de Turin, s  eance. Le 
Remou et sur la Propagation des Ondes, 12, pp. 21e112.
Biswas, R., Strawn, R.C., 1998. Tetrahedral and hexahedral mesh adaptation for CFD
problems. Elsevier Appl. Numer. Math. 26 (1), 135e151.
Blocken, B., Gualtieri, C., 2012. Ten iterative steps for model development and
evaluation applied to computational fluid dynamics for environmental fluid
mechanics. Environ. Model. Softw. 33, 1e22.
Bombardelli, F.A., Meireles, I., Matos, J., 2011. Laboratory measurements and multiblock numerical simulations of the mean flow and turbulence in the nonaerated skimming flow region of steep stepped spillways. Springer Environ.
Fluid Mech. 11 (3), 263e288.
Bombardelli, F.A., 2012. Computational multi-phase fluid dynamics to address flows
past hydraulic structures. In: 4th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic
Structures, 9e11 February 2012, Porto, Portugal, 978-989-8509-01-7.
Borges, J.E., Pereira, N.H., Matos, J., Frizell, K.H., 2010. Performance of a combined
three-hole conductivity probe for void fraction and velocity measurement in
airewater flows. Exp. fluids 48 (1), 17e31.
Borue, V., Orszag, S., Staroslesky, I., 1995. Interaction of surface waves with turbulence: direct numerical simulations of turbulent open channel flow. J. Fluid
Mech. 286, 1e23.
Boussinesq, J., 1871. Theorie de l’intumescence liquide, applelee onde solitaire ou de
translation, se propageantdans un canal rectangulaire. Comptes Rendus l’Academie Sci. 72, 755e759.
Bradley, J.N., Peterka, A.J., 1957. The hydraulic design of stilling Basins : hydraulic
jumps on a horizontal Apron (Basin I). In: Proceedings ASCE, J. Hydraulics
Division.
Bradshaw, P., 1996. Understanding and prediction of turbulent flow. Elsevier Int. J.
heat fluid flow 18 (1), 45e54.
Bung, D.B., 2013. Non-intrusive detection of airewater surface roughness in selfaerated chute flows. J. Hydraulic Res. 51 (3), 322e329.
Bung, D., Schlenkhoff, A., 2010. Self-aerated Skimming Flow on Embankment
Stepped Spillways-the Effect of Additional Micro-roughness on Energy Dissipation and Oxygen Transfer. IAHR European Congress.
Caisley, M.E., Bombardelli, F.A., Garcia, M.H., 1999. Hydraulic Model Study of a Canoe
Chute for Low-head Dams in Illinois. Civil Engineering Studies, Hydraulic Engineering Series No-63. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Carvalho, R., Lemos, C., Ramos, C., 2008. Numerical computation of the flow in
hydraulic jump stilling basins. J. Hydraulic Res. 46 (6), 739e752.
Celik, I.B., Ghia, U., Roache, P.J., 2008. Procedure for estimation and reporting of
uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 130
(7), 1e4.
Chachereau, Y., Chanson, H., 2011. .Free-surface fluctuations and turbulence in hydraulic jumps. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 35 (6), 896e909.
Chanson, H. (Ed.), 2015. Energy Dissipation in Hydraulic Structures. CRC Press.
Chanson, H., 2007. Bubbly flow structure in hydraulic jump. Eur. J. Mechanics-B/
Fluids 26.3(2007) 367e384.
Chanson, H., Carvalho, R., 2015. Hydraulic jumps and stilling basins. Chapter 4. In:
Chanson, H. (Ed.), Energy Dissipation in Hydraulic Structures. CRC Press, Taylor
& Francis Group, ABalkema Book.
Chanson, H., Gualtieri, C., 2008. Similitude and scale effects of air entrainment in
hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraulic Res. 46 (1), 35e44.
Chanson, H., Lubin, P., 2010. Discussion of “Verification and validation of a
computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model for air entrainment at spillway
aerators” Appears in the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 36(5): 826-838.
Can. J. Civ. Eng. 37 (1), 135e138.
Chanson, H., 1994. Drag reduction in open channel flow by aeration and suspended
load. Taylor & Francis J. Hydraulic Res. 32, 87e101.
Chanson, H., Montes, J.S., 1995. Characteristics of undular hydraulic jumps: experimental apparatus and flow patterns. J. hydraulic Eng. 121 (2), 129e144.
Chanson, H., Brattberg, T., 2000. Experimental study of the airewater shear flow in
a hydraulic jump. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 26 (4), 583e607.
Chanson, H., 2013. Hydraulics of aerated flows: qui pro quo? Taylor & Francis
J. Hydraulic Res. 51 (3), 223e243.
Chaudhry, M.H., 2007. Open-channel Flow, Springer Science & Business Media.
Chen, L., Li, Y., 1998. .A numerical method for two-phase flows with an interface.
Environ. Model. Softw. 13 (3), 247e255.
Chow, V.T., 1959. Open Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, New
York.
Daly, B.J., 1969. A technique for including surface tension effects in hydrodynamic
calculations. Elsevier J. Comput. Phys. 4 (1), 97e117.
De Padova, D., Mossa, M., Sibilla, S., Torti, E., 2013. 3D SPH modeling of hydraulic
jump in a very large channel. Taylor & Francis J. Hydraulic Res. 51 (2), 158e173.
Dewals, B., Andre, S., Schleiss, A., Pirotton, M., 2004. Validation of a quasi-2D model 
for aerated flows over stepped spillways for mild and steep slopes. Proc. 6th Int.
Conf. Hydroinformatics 1, 63e70.
Falvey, H.T., 1980. Air-water flow in hydraulic structures. NASA STI Recon Tech. Rep.
N. 81, 26429.
Fawer, C., 1937. Etude de quelquesecoulements permanents 
a filets courbes (‘Study
of some Steady Flows with Curved Streamlines’). Thesis. Imprimerie La Concorde, Lausanne, Switzerland, 127 pages (in French).
Gualtieri, C., Chanson, H., 2007. .Experimental analysis of Froude number effect on
air entrainment in the hydraulic jump. Springer Environ. Fluid Mech. 7 (3),
217e238.
Gualtieri, C., Chanson, H., 2010. Effect of Froude number on bubble clustering in a
hydraulic jump. J. Hydraulic Res. 48 (4), 504e508.
Hager, W., Sinniger, R., 1985. Flow characteristics of the hydraulic jump in a stilling
basin with an abrupt bottom rise. Taylor & Francis J. Hydraulic Res. 23 (2),
101e113.
Hager, W.H., 1992. Energy Dissipators and Hydraulic Jump, Springer.
Hager, W.H., Bremen, R., 1989. Classical hydraulic jump: sequent depths. J. Hydraulic
Res. 27 (5), 565e583.
Hartanto, I.M., Beevers, L., Popescu, I., Wright, N.G., 2011. Application of a coastal
modelling code in fluvial environments. Environ. Model. Softw. 26 (12),
1685e1695.
Hirsch, C., 2007. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows: the Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1.
Hirt, C., Nichols, B., 1981. .Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free
boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39 (1), 201e225.
Hyman, J.M., 1984. Numerical methods for tracking interfaces. Elsevier Phys. D.
Nonlinear Phenom. 12 (1), 396e407.
Juez, C., Murillo, J., Garcia-Navarro, P., 2013. Numerical assessment of bed-load
discharge formulations for transient flow in 1D and 2D situations.
J. Hydroinformatics 15 (4).
Keyes, D., Ecer, A., Satofuka, N., Fox, P., Periaux, J., 2000. Parallel Computational Fluid
Dynamics’ 99: towards Teraflops, Optimization and Novel Formulations.
Elsevier.
Kim, J.J., Baik, J.J., 2004. A numerical study of the effects of ambient wind direction
on flow and dispersion in urban street canyons using the RNG keε turbulence
model. Atmos. Environ. 38 (19), 3039e3048.
Kim, S.-E., Boysan, F., 1999. Application of CFD to environmental flows. Elsevier
J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynamics 81 (1), 145e158.
Liu, M., Rajaratnam, N., Zhu, D.Z., 2004. Turbulence structure of hydraulic jumps of
low Froude numbers. J. Hydraulic Eng. 130 (6), 511e520.
Lobosco, R., Schulz, H., Simoes, A., 2011. Analysis of Two Phase Flows on Stepped
Spillways, Hydrodynamics – Optimizing Methods and Tools. Available from. :
http://www.intechopen.com/books/hyd rodynamics-optimizing-methods-andtools/analysis-of-two-phase-flows-on-stepped-spillways. Accessed February
27th 2014.
Long, D., Rajaratnam, N., Steffler, P.M., Smy, P.R., 1991. Structure of flow in hydraulic
jumps. Taylor & Francis J. Hydraulic Res. 29 (2), 207e218.
Ma, J., Oberai, A.A., Lahey Jr., R.T., Drew, D.A., 2011. Modeling air entrainment and
transport in a hydraulic jump using two-fluid RANS and DES turbulence
models. Heat Mass Transf. 47 (8), 911e919.
Matos, J., Frizell, K., Andre, S., Frizell, K., 2002. On the performance of velocity 
measurement techniques in air-water flows. Hydraulic Meas. Exp. Methods
2002, 1e11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40655(2002)58.
Meireles, I.C., Bombardelli, F.A., Matos, J., 2014. .Air entrainment onset in skimming
flows on steep stepped spillways: an analysis. J. Hydraulic Res. 52 (3), 375e385.
McDonald, P., 1971. The Computation of Transonic Flow through Two-dimensional
Gas Turbine Cascades.
Mossa, M., 1999. On the oscillating characteristics of hydraulic jumps, Journal of
Hydraulic Research. Taylor &Francis 37 (4), 541e558.
Murzyn, F., Chanson, H., 2009a. Two-phase Gas-liquid Flow Properties in the Hydraulic Jump: Review and Perspectives. Nova Science Publishers.
Murzyn, F., Chanson, H., 2009b. Experimental investigation of bubbly flow and
turbulence in hydraulic jumps. Environ. Fluid Mech. 2, 143e159.
Murzyn, F., Mouaze, D., Chaplin, J.R., 2007. Airewater interface dynamic and free
surface features in hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraulic Res. 45 (5), 679e685.
Murzyn, F., Mouaze, D., Chaplin, J., 2005. Optical fiber probe measurements of
bubbly flow in hydraulic jumps. Elsevier Int. J. Multiph. Flow 31 (1), 141e154.
Nagosa, R., 1999. Direct numerical simulation of vortex structures and turbulence
scalar transfer across a free surface in a fully developed turbulence. Phys. Fluids
11, 1581e1595.
Noh, W.F., Woodward, P., 1976. SLIC (Simple Line Interface Calculation), Proceedings
of the Fifth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics
June 28-July 2. 1976 Twente University, Enschede, pp. 330e340.
Oertel, M., Bung, D.B., 2012. Initial stage of two-dimensional dam-break waves:
laboratory versus VOF. J. Hydraulic Res. 50 (1), 89e97.
Olivari, D., Benocci, C., 2010. Introduction to Mechanics of Turbulence. Von Karman
Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
Omid, M.H., Omid, M., Varaki, M.E., 2005. Modelling hydraulic jumps with artificial
neural networks. Thomas Telford Proc. ICE-Water Manag. 158 (2), 65e70.
OpenFOAM, 2011. OpenFOAM: the Open Source CFD Toolbox User Guide. The Free
Software Foundation Inc.
Peterka, A.J., 1984. Hydraulic design of spillways and energy dissipators. A water
resources technical publication. Eng. Monogr. 25.
Pope, S.B., 2000. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge university press.
Pfister, M., 2011. Chute aerators: steep deflectors and cavity subpressure, Journal of
hydraulic engineering. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 137 (10), 1208e1215.
Prosperetti, A., Tryggvason, G., 2007. Computational Methods for Multiphase Flow.
Cambridge University Press.
Rajaratnam, N., 1965. The hydraulic jump as a Wall Jet. Proc. ASCE, J. Hydraul. Div. 91
(HY5), 107e132.
Resch, F., Leutheusser, H., 1972. Reynolds stress measurements in hydraulic jumps.
Taylor & Francis J. Hydraulic Res. 10 (4), 409e430.
Romagnoli, M., Portapila, M., Morvan, H., 2009. Computational simulation of a
hydraulic jump (original title, in Spanish: “Simulacioncomputacional del
resaltohidraulico”), MecanicaComputacional, XXVIII, pp. 1661e1672.
Rouse, H., Siao, T.T., Nagaratnam, S., 1959. Turbulence characteristics of the hydraulic jump. Trans. ASCE 124, 926e966.
Rusche, H., 2002. Computational Fluid Dynamics of Dispersed Two-phase Flows at
High Phase Fractions. Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK.
Saint-Venant, A., 1871. Theorie du movement non permanent des eaux, avec
application aux crues des riviereset a l’introduction de mareesdansleurslits.
Comptesrendus des seances de l’Academie des Sciences.
Schlichting, H., Gersten, K., 2000. Boundary-layer Theory. Springer.
Spalart, P.R., 2000. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations. Int. J. Heat
Fluid Flow 21 (3), 252e263.
Speziale, C.G., Thangam, S., 1992. Analysis of an RNG based turbulence model for
separated flows. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 30 (10), 1379eIN4.
Toge, G.E., 2012. The Significance of Froude Number in Vertical Pipes: a CFD Study.
University of Stavanger, Norway.
Ubbink, O., 1997. Numerical Prediction of Two Fluid Systems with Sharp Interfaces.
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK.
Valero, D., García-Bartual, R., 2016. Calibration of an air entrainment model for CFD
spillway applications. Adv. Hydroinformatics 571e582. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1007/978-981-287-615-7_38. P. Gourbesville et al. Springer Water.
Valero, D., Bung, D.B., 2015. Hybrid investigations of air transport processes in
moderately sloped stepped spillway flows. In: E-Proceedings of the 36th IAHR
World Congress, 28 June e 3 July, 2015 (The Hague, the Netherlands).
Van Leer, B., 1977. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow. J.
Comput. Phys 23 (3), 263e275.
Von Karman, T., 1930. MechanischeAhnlichkeit und Turbulenz, Nachrichten von der
Gesellschaft der WissenschaftenzuGottingen. Fachgr. 1 Math. 5, 58 € e76.
Wang, H., Murzyn, F., Chanson, H., 2014a. Total pressure fluctuations and two-phase
flow turbulence in hydraulic jumps. Exp. Fluids 55.11(2014) Pap. 1847, 1e16
(DOI: 10.1007/s00348-014-1847-9).
Wang, H., Felder, S., Chanson, H., 2014b. An experimental study of turbulent twophase flow in hydraulic jumps and application of a triple decomposition
technique. Exp. Fluids 55.7(2014) Pap. 1775, 1e18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
s00348-014-1775-8.
Wang, H., Chanson, H., 2015a. .Experimental study of turbulent fluctuations in
hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraul. Eng. 141 (7) http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)
HY.1943-7900.0001010. Paper 04015010, 10 pages.
Wang, H., Chanson, H., 2015b. Integral turbulent length and time scales in hydraulic
jumps: an experimental investigation at large Reynolds numbers. In: E-Proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress 28 June e 3 July, 2015, The
Netherlands.
Weller, H., Tabor, G., Jasak, H., Fureby, C., 1998. A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques. Comput. Phys.
12, 620e631.
Wilcox, D., 1998. Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries. La Canada, California (USA).
Witt, A., Gulliver, J., Shen, L., June 2015. Simulating air entrainment and vortex
dynamics in a hydraulic jump. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 72, 165e180. ISSN 0301-

  1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.02.012. http://www.
    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301932215000336.
    Wood, I.R., 1991. Air Entrainment in Free-surface Flows, IAHR Hydraulic Design
    Manual No.4, Hydraulic Design Considerations. Balkema Publications, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
    Yakhot, V., Orszag, S., Thangam, S., Gatski, T., Speziale, C., 1992. Development of
    turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique, Physics of
    Fluids A: fluid Dynamics (1989-1993). AIP Publ. 4 (7), 1510e1520.
    Youngs, D.L., 1984. An interface tracking method for a 3D Eulerian hydrodynamics
    code. Tech. Rep. 44 (92), 35e35.
    Zhang, G., Wang, H., Chanson, H., 2013. Turbulence and aeration in hydraulic jumps:
    free-surface fluctuation and integral turbulent scale measurements. Environ.
    fluid Mech. 13 (2), 189e204.
    Zhang, W., Liu, M., Zhu, D.Z., Rajaratnam, N., 2014. Mean and turbulent bubble
    velocities in free hydraulic jumps for small to intermediate froude numbers.
    J. Hydraulic Eng.

The Optimal Operation on Auxiliary Spillway to Minimize the Flood Damage in Downstream River with Various Outflow Conditions

류하천의 영향 최소화를 위한 보조 여수로 최적 활용방안 검토

Hyung Ju Yoo1 Sung Sik Joo2 Beom Jae Kwon3 Seung Oh Lee4*
유 형주1 주 성식2 권 범재3 이 승오4*
1Ph.D Student, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University2Director, Water Resources & Environment Department, HECOREA3Director, Water Resources Department, ISAN4Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hongik University
1홍익대학교 건설환경공학과 박사과정
2㈜헥코리아 수자원환경사업부 이사
3㈜이산 수자원부 이사
4홍익대학교 건설환경공학과 교수*Corresponding Author

ABSTRACT

최근 기후변화로 인해 강우강도 및 빈도의 증가에 따른 집중호우의 영향 및 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 홍수 시 하류 하천의 영향을 최소화할 수 있는 보조 여수로 활용방안 구축이 필요한 실정이다. 이를 위해, 수리모형 실험 및 수치모형 실험을 통하여 보조 여수로 운영에 따른 흐름특성 변화 검토에 관한 연구가 많이 진행되어 왔다.

그러나 대부분의 연구는 여수로에서의 흐름특성 및 기능성에 대한 검토를 수행하였을 뿐 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 따른 하류하천 영향 검토 및 호안 안정성 검토에 관한 연구는 미비한 실정이다.

이에 본 연구에서는 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 방류 조건에 따른 하류영향 분석 및 호안 안정성 측면에서 최적 방류 시나리오 검토를 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 사용하여 검토하였다. 또한 FLOW-3D 수치모의 수행을 통한 유속, 수위 결과와 소류력 산정 결과를 호안 설계허용 기준과 비교하였다.

수문 완전 개도 조건으로 가정하고 계획홍수량 유입 시 다양한 보조 여수로 활용방안에 대하여 수치모의를 수행한 결과, 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 기존 여수로 단독운영에 비하여 최대유속 및 최대 수위의 감소효과를 확인하였다. 다만 계획홍수량의 45% 이하 방류 조건에서 대안부의 호안 안정성을 확보하였고 해당 방류량 초과 경우에는 처오름 현상이 발생하여 월류에 대한 위험성 증가를 확인하였다.

따라서 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 방안 도출이 중요하다고 판단하였다. 여수로의 배분 비율 및 총 허용 방류량에 대하여 검토한 결과 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량보다 큰 경우 하류하천의 흐름이 중심으로 집중되어 대안부의 유속 저감 및 수위 감소를 확인하였고, 계획 홍수량의 77% 이하의 조건에서 호안의 허용 유속 및 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하였다.

이를 통하여 본 연구에서 제안한 보조 여수로 활용방안으로는 기존 여수로와 동시 운영 시 총 방류량에 대하여 보조 여수로의 배분량이 기존 여수로의 배분량보다 크게 설정하는 것이 하류하천의 영향을 최소화 할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다.

그러나 본 연구는 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서의 영향에 대해서만 검토하였고 수문 전면 개도 조건에서 검토하였다는 한계점은 분명히 있다. 이에 향후에는 다양한 수문 개도 조건 및 방류 시나리오를 적용 및 검토한다면 보다 효율적이고, 효과적인 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출이 가능할 것으로 기대 된다.

키워드

보조 여수로, FLOW-3D, 수치모의, 호안 안정성, 소류력

Recently, as the occurrence frequency of sudden floods due to climate change increased and the aging of the existing spillway, it is necessary to establish a plan to utilize an auxiliary spillway to minimize the flood damage of downstream rivers. Most studies have been conducted on the review of flow characteristics according to the operation of auxiliary spillway through the hydraulic experiments and numerical modeling. However, the studies on examination of flood damage in the downstream rivers and the stability of the revetment according to the operation of the auxiliary spillway were relatively insufficient in the literature. In this study, the stability of the revetment on the downstream river according to the outflow conditions of the existing and auxiliary spillway was examined by using 3D numerical model, FLOW-3D. The velocity, water surface elevation and shear stress results of FLOW-3D were compared with the permissible velocity and shear stress of design criteria. It was assumed the sluice gate was fully opened. As a result of numerical simulations of various auxiliary spillway operations during flood season, the single operation of the auxiliary spillway showed the reduction effect of maximum velocity and the water surface elevation compared with the single operation of the existing spillway. The stability of the revetment on downstream was satisfied under the condition of outflow less than 45% of the design flood discharge. However, the potential overtopping damage was confirmed in the case of exceeding the 45% of the design flood discharge. Therefore, the simultaneous operation with the existing spillway was important to ensure the stability on design flood discharge condition. As a result of examining the allocation ratio and the total allowable outflow, the reduction effect of maximum velocity was confirmed on the condition, where the amount of outflow on auxiliary spillway was more than that on existing spillway. It is because the flow of downstream rivers was concentrated in the center due to the outflow of existing spillway. The permissible velocity and shear stress were satisfied under the condition of less than 77% of the design flood discharge with simultaneous operation. It was found that the flood damage of downstream rivers can be minimized by setting the amount allocated to the auxiliary spillway to be larger than the amount allocated to the existing spillway for the total outflow with simultaneous operation condition. However, this study only reviewed the flow characteristics around the revetment according to the outflow of spillway under the full opening of the sluice gate condition. Therefore, the various sluice opening conditions and outflow scenarios will be asked to derive more efficient utilization of the auxiliary spillway in th future.KeywordsAuxiliary spillway FLOW-3D Numerical simulation Revetment stability Shear stress

1. 서 론

최근 기후변화로 인한 집중호우의 영향으로 홍수 시 댐으로 유입되는 홍수량이 설계 홍수량보다 증가하여 댐 안정성 확보가 필요한 실정이다(Office for Government Policy Coordination, 2003). MOLIT & K-water(2004)에서는 기존댐의 수문학적 안정성 검토를 수행하였으며 이상홍수 발생 시 24개 댐에서 월류 등으로 인한 붕괴위험으로 댐 하류지역의 극심한 피해를 예상하여 보조여수로 신설 및 기존여수로 확장 등 치수능력 증대 기본계획을 수립하였고 이를 통하여 극한홍수 발생 시 홍수량 배제능력을 증대하여 기존댐의 안전성 확보 및 하류지역의 피해를 방지하고자 하였다. 여기서 보조 여수로는 기존 여수로와 동시 또는 별도 운영하는 여수로로써 비상상황 시 방류 기능을 포함하고 있고(K-water, 2021), 최근에는 기존 여수로의 노후화에 따라 보조여수로의 활용방안에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 3차원 수치해석을 수행하여 기존 및 보조 여수로의 방류량 조합에 따른 하류 영향을 분석하고 하류 호안 안정성 측면에서 최적 방류 시나리오를 검토하고자 한다.

기존의 댐 여수로 검토에 관한 연구는 주로 수리실험을 통하여 방류조건 별 흐름특성을 검토하였으나 최근에는 수치모형 실험결과가 수리모형실험과 비교하여 근사한 것을 확인하는 등 점차 수치모형실험을 수리모형실험의 대안으로 활용하고 있다(Jeon et al., 2006; Kim, 2007; Kim et al., 2008). 국내의 경우, Jeon et al.(2006)은 수리모형 실험과 수치모의를 이용하여 임하댐 바상여수로의 기본설계안을 도출하였고, Kim et al.(2008)은 가능최대홍수량 유입 시 비상여수로 방류에 따른 수리학적 안정성과 기능성을 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 활용하여 검토하였다. 또한 Kim and Kim(2013)은 충주댐의 홍수조절 효과 검토 및 방류량 변화에 따른 상·하류의 수위 변화를 수치모형을 통하여 검토하였다. 국외의 경우 Zeng et al.(2017)은 3차원 수치모형인 Fluent를 활용한 여수로 방류에 따른 흐름특성 결과와 측정결과를 비교하여 수치모형 결과의 신뢰성을 검토하였다. Li et al.(2011)은 가능 최대 홍수량(Probable Maximum Flood, PMF)조건에서 기존 여수로와 신규 보조 여수로 유입부 주변의 흐름특성에 대하여 3차원 수치모형 Fluent를 활용하여 검토하였고, Lee et al.(2019)는 서로 근접해있는 기존 여수로와 보조여수로 동시 운영 시 방류능 검토를 수리모형 실험 및 수치모형 실험(FLOW-3D)을 통하여 수행하였으며 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로를 동시운영하게 되면 배수로 간섭으로 인하여 총 방류량이 7.6%까지 감소되어 댐의 방류능력이 감소하였음을 확인하였다.

그러나 대부분의 여수로 검토에 대한 연구는 여수로 내에서의 흐름특성 및 기능성에 대한 검토를 수행하였고. 이에 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류운영에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 변화 및 호안 안정성 평가에 관한 추가적인 검토가 필요한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 방류 조건에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 호안 안정성분석을 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 이용하여 검토하였다. 또한 다양한 방류 배분 비율 및 허용 방류량 조건 변화에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력 분석결과를 호안 설계 허용유속 및 허용 소류력 기준과 비교하여 하류하천의 영향을 최소화 할 수 있는 최적의 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출하고자 한다.

2. 본 론

2.1 이론적 배경

2.1.1 3차원 수치모형의 기본이론

FLOW-3D는 미국 Flow Science, Inc에서 개발한 범용 유체역학 프로그램(CFD, Computational Fluid Dynamics)으로 자유 수면을 갖는 흐름모의에 사용되는 3차원 수치해석 모형이다. 난류모형을 통해 난류 해석이 가능하고, 댐 방류에 따른 하류 하천의 흐름 해석에도 많이 사용되어 왔다(Flow Science, 2011). 본 연구에서는 FLOW-3D(version 12.0)을 이용하여 홍수 시 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대한 검토를 하류하천의 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토하였다.

2.1.2 유동해석의 지배방정식

1) 연속 방정식(Continuity Equation)

FLOW-3D는 비압축성 유체에 대하여 연속방정식을 사용하며, 밀도는 상수항으로 적용된다. 연속 방정식은 Eqs. (1), (2)와 같다.

(1)

∇·v=0

(2)

∂∂x(uAx)+∂∂y(vAy)+∂∂z(wAz)=RSORρ

여기서, ρ는 유체 밀도(kg/m3), u, v, w는 x, y, z방향의 유속(m/s), Ax, Ay, Az는 각 방향의 요소면적(m2), RSOR는 질량 생성/소멸(mass source/sink)항을 의미한다.

2) 운동량 방정식(Momentum Equation)

각 방향 속도성분 u, v, w에 대한 운동방정식은 Navier-Stokes 방정식으로 다음 Eqs. (3), (4), (5)와 같다.

(3)

∂u∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂x+Gx+fx-bx-RSORρVFu

(4)

∂v∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂y+Gy+fy-by-RSORρVFv

(5)

∂w∂t+1VF(uAx∂u∂x+vAy∂v∂y+wAz∂w∂z)=-1ρ∂p∂z+Gz+fz-bz-RSORρVFw

여기서, Gx, Gy, Gz는 체적력에 의한 가속항, fx, fy, fz는 점성에 의한 가속항, bx, by, bz는 다공성 매체에서의 흐름손실을 의미한다.

2.1.3 소류력 산정

호안설계 시 제방사면 호안의 안정성 확보를 위해서는 하천의 흐름에 의하여 호안에 작용하는 소류력에 저항할 수 있는 재료 및 공법 선택이 필요하다. 국내의 경우 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)에서 계획홍수량 유하 시 소류력 산정 방법을 제시하고 있다. 소류력은 하천의 평균유속을 이용하여 산정할 수 있으며, 소류력 산정식은 Eqs. (6), (7)과 같다.

1) Schoklitsch 공식

Schoklitsch(1934)는 Chezy 유속계수를 적용하여 소류력을 산정하였다.

(6)

τ=γRI=γC2V2

여기서, τ는 소류력(N/m2), R은 동수반경(m), γ는 물의 단위중량(10.0 kN/m3), I는 에너지경사, C는 Chezy 유속계수, V는 평균유속(m/s)을 의미한다.

2) Manning 조도계수를 고려한 공식

Chezy 유속계수를 대신하여 Manning의 조도계수를 고려하여 소류력을 산정할 수 있다.

(7)

τ=γn2V2R1/3

여기서, τ는 소류력(N/m2), R은 동수반경(m), γ는 물의 단위중량(10.0 kN/m3), n은 Manning의 조도계수, V는 평균유속(m/s)을 의미한다.

FLOW-3D 수치모의 수행을 통하여 하천의 바닥 유속을 도출할 수 있으며, 본 연구에서는 Maning 조도계수롤 고려하여 소류력을 산정하고자 한다. 소류력을 산정하기 위해서 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부의 바닥유속 변화를 검토하여 최대 유속 값을 이용하였다. 최종적으로 산정한 소류력과 호안의 재료 및 공법에 따른 허용 소류력과 비교하여 제방사면 호안의 안정성 검토를 수행하게 된다.

2.2 하천호안 설계기준

하천 호안은 계획홍수위 이하의 유수작용에 대하여 안정성이 확보되도록 계획하여야 하며, 호안의 설계 시에는 사용재료의 확보용이성, 시공상의 용이성, 세굴에 대한 굴요성(flexibility) 등을 고려하여 호안의 형태, 시공방법 등을 결정한다(MOLIT, 2019). 국내의 경우, 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)에서는 다양한 호안공법에 대하여 비탈경사에 따라 설계 유속을 비교하거나, 허용 소류력을 비교함으로써 호안의 안정성을 평가한다. 호안에 대한 국외의 설계기준으로 미국의 경우, ASTM(미국재료시험학회)에서 호안블록 및 식생매트 시험방법을 제시하였고 제품별로 ASTM 시험에 의한 허용유속 및 허용 소류력을 제시하였다. 일본의 경우, 호안 블록에 대한 축소실험을 통하여 항력을 측정하고 이를 통해서 호안 블록에 대한 항력계수를 제시하고 있다. 설계 시에는 항력계수에 의한 블록의 안정성을 평가하고 있으나, 최근에는 세굴의 영향을 고려할 수 있는 호안 안정성 평가의 필요성을 제기하고 있다(MOLIT, 2019). 관련된 국내·외의 하천호안 설계기준은 Table 1에 정리하여 제시하였고, 본 연구에서 하천 호안 안정성 평가 시 하천공사설계실무요령(MOLIT, 2016)과 ASTM 시험에서 제시한 허용소류력 및 허용유속 기준을 비교하여 각각 0.28 kN/m2, 5.0 m/s 미만일 경우 호안 안정성을 확보하였다고 판단하였다.

Table 1.

Standard of Permissible Velocity and Shear on Revetment

Country (Reference)MaterialPermissible velocity (Vp, m/s)Permissible Shear (τp, kN/m2)
KoreaRiver Construction Design Practice Guidelines
(MOLIT, 2016)		Vegetated5.00.50
Stone5.00.80
USAASTM D’6460Vegetated6.10.81
Unvegetated5.00.28
JAPANDynamic Design Method of Revetment–5.0–

2.3. 보조여수로 운영에 따른 하류하천 영향 분석

2.3.1 모형의 구축 및 경계조건

본 연구에서는 기존 여수로의 노후화에 대비하여 홍수 시 보조여수로의 활용방안에 따른 하류하천의 흐름특성 및 호안안정성 평가를 수행하기 위해 FLOW-3D 모형을 이용하였다. 기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로는 치수능력 증대사업(MOLIT & K-water, 2004)을 통하여 완공된 ○○댐의 제원을 이용하여 구축하였다. ○○댐은 설계빈도(100년) 및 200년빈도 까지는 계획홍수위 이내로 기존 여수로를 통하여 운영이 가능하나 그 이상 홍수조절은 보조여수로를 통하여 조절해야 하며, 또한 2011년 기존 여수로 정밀안전진단 결과 사면의 표층 유실 및 옹벽 밀림현상 등이 확인되어 노후화에 따른 보수·보강이 필요한 상태이다. 이에 보조여수로의 활용방안 검토가 필요한 것으로 판단하여 본 연구의 대상댐으로 선정하였다. 하류 하천의 흐름특성을 예측하기 위하여 격자간격을 0.99 ~ 8.16 m의 크기로 하여 총 격자수는 49,102,500개로 구성하였으며, 여수로 방류에 따른 하류하천의 흐름해석을 위한 경계조건으로 상류는 유입유량(inflow), 바닥은 벽면(wall), 하류는 수위(water surface elevation)조건으로 적용하도록 하였다(Table 2, Fig. 1 참조). FLOW-3D 난류모형에는 혼합길이 모형, 난류에너지 모형, k-ϵ모형, RNG(Renormalized Group Theory) k-ϵ모형, LES 모형 등이 있으며, 본 연구에서는 여수로 방류에 따른 복잡한 난류 흐름 및 높은 전단흐름을 정확하게 모의(Flow Science, 2011)할 수 있는 RNG k-ϵ모형을 사용하였고, 하류하천 호안의 안정성 측면에서 보조여수로의 활용방안을 검토하기 위하여 방류시나리오는 Table 3에 제시된 것 같이 설정하였다. Case 1 및 Case 2를 통하여 계획홍수량에 대하여 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 단독 운영이 하류하천에 미치는 영향을 확인하였고 보조 여수로의 방류량 조절을 통하여 호안 안정성 측면에서 보조 여수로 방류능 검토를 수행하였다(Case 3 ~ Case 6). 또한 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분에 따른 하류하천의 영향 검토(Case 7 ~ Case 10) 및 방류 배분에 따른 허용 방류량을 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토를 수행하였다(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

수문은 완전개도 조건으로 가정하였으며 하류하천의 계획홍수량에 대한 기존 여수로와 보조여수로의 배분량을 조절하여 모의를 수행하였다. 여수로는 콘크리트의 조도계수 값(Chow, 1959)을 채택하였고, 댐 하류하천의 조도계수는 하천기본계획(Busan Construction and Management Administration, 2009) 제시된 조도계수 값을 채택하였으며 FLOW-3D의 적용을 위하여 Manning-Strickler 공식(Vanoni, 2006)을 이용하여 조도계수를 조고값으로 변환하여 사용하였다. Manning-Strickler 공식은 Eq. (8)과 같으며, FLOW-3D에 적용한 조도계수 및 조고는 Table 4와 같다.

(8)

n=ks1/68.1g1/2

여기서, kS는 조고 (m), n은 Manning의 조도계수, g는 중력가속도(m/s2)를 의미한다.

시간에 따라 동일한 유량이 일정하게 유입되도록 모의를 수행하였으며, 시간간격(Time Step)은 0.0001초로 설정(CFL number < 1.0) 하였다. 또한 여수로 수문을 통한 유량의 변동 값이 1.0%이내일 경우는 연속방정식을 만족하고 있다고 가정하였다. 이는, 유량의 변동 값이 1.0%이내일 경우 유속의 변동 값 역시 1.0%이내이며, 수치모의 결과 1.0%의 유속변동은 호안의 유속설계기준에 크게 영향을 미치지 않는다고 판단하였다. 그 결과 모든 수치모의 Case에서 2400초 이내에 결과 값이 수렴하는 것을 확인하였다.

Table 2.

Mesh sizes and numerical conditions

MeshNumbers49,102,500 EA
Increment (m)DirectionExisting SpillwayAuxiliary Spillway
∆X0.99 ~ 4.301.00 ~ 4.30
∆Y0.99 ~ 8.161.00 ~ 5.90
∆Z0.50 ~ 1.220.50 ~ 2.00
Boundary ConditionsXmin / YmaxInflow / Water Surface Elevation
Xmax, Ymin, Zmin / ZmaxWall / Symmetry
Turbulence ModelRNG model
Table 3.

Case of numerical simulation (Qp : Design flood discharge)

CaseExisting Spillway (Qe, m3/s)Auxiliary Spillway (Qa, m3/s)Remarks
1Qp0Reference case
20Qp
300.58QpReview of discharge capacity on
auxiliary spillway
400.48Qp
500.45Qp
600.32Qp
70.50Qp0.50QpDetermination of optimal division
ratio on Spillways
80.61Qp0.39Qp
90.39Qp0.61Qp
100.42Qp0.58Qp
110.32Qp0.45QpDetermination of permissible
division on Spillways
120.35Qp0.48Qp
130.38Qp0.53Qp
140.41Qp0.56Qp
Table 4.

Roughness coefficient and roughness height

CriteriaRoughness coefficient (n)Roughness height (ks, m)
Structure (Concrete)0.0140.00061
River0.0330.10496
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F1.jpg
Fig. 1

Layout of spillway and river in this study

2.3.2 보조 여수로의 방류능 검토

본 연구에서는 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분에 따른 하류하천 대안부의 유속분포 및 수위분포를 검토하기 위해 수치모의 Case 별 다음과 같이 관심구역을 설정하였다(Fig. 2 참조). 관심구역(대안부)의 길이(L)는 총 1.3 km로 10 m 등 간격으로 나누어 검토하였으며, Section 1(0 < X/L < 0.27)은 기존 여수로 방류에 따른 영향이 지배적인 구간, Section 2(0.27 < X/L < 1.00)는 보조 여수로 방류에 따른 영향이 지배적인 구간으로 각 구간에서의 수위, 유속, 수심결과를 확인하였다. 기존 여수로의 노후화에 따른 보조 여수로의 방류능 검토를 위하여 Case 1 – Case 6까지의 결과를 비교하였다.

보조 여수로의 단독 운영 시 기존 여수로 운영 시 보다 하류하천의 대안부의 최대 유속(Vmax)은 약 3% 감소하였으며, 이는 보조 여수로의 하천 유입각이 기존 여수로 보다 7°작으며 유입하천의 폭이 증가하여 유속이 감소한 것으로 판단된다. 대안부의 최대 유속 발생위치는 하류 쪽으로 이동하였으며 교량으로 인한 단면의 축소로 최대유속이 발생하는 것으로 판단된다. 또한 보조 여수로의 배분량(Qa)이 증가함에 따라 하류하천 대안부의 최대 유속이 증가하였다. 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시하고 있는 허용유속(Vp)과 비교한 결과, 계획홍수량(Qp)의 45% 이하(Case 5 & 6)를 보조 여수로에서 방류하게 되면 허용 유속(5.0 m/s)조건을 만족하여 호안안정성을 확보하였다(Fig. 3 참조). 허용유속 외에도 대안부에서의 소류력을 산정하여 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시한 허용 소류력(τp)과 비교한 결과, 유속과 동일하게 보조 여수로의 방류량이 계획홍수량의 45% 이하일 경우 허용소류력(0.28 kN/m2) 조건을 만족하였다(Fig. 4 참조). 각 Case 별 호안설계조건과 비교한 결과는 Table 5에 제시하였다.

하류하천의 수위도 기존 여수로 운영 시 보다 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 최대 수위(ηmax)가 약 2% 감소하는 효과를 보였으며 최대 수위 발생위치는 수충부로 여수로 방류시 처오름에 의한 수위 상승으로 판단된다. 기존 여수로의 단독운영(Case 1)의 수위(ηref)를 기준으로 보조 여수로의 방류량이 증가함에 따라 수위는 증가하였으나 계획홍수량의 58%까지 방류할 경우 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보되었다(Fig. 5 참조). 그러나 계획홍수량 조건에서는 월류에 대한 위험성이 존재하기 때문에 기존여수로와 보조여수로의 적절한 방류량 배분 조합을 도출하는 것이 중요하다고 판단되어 진다.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F2.jpg
Fig. 2

Region of interest in this study

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F3.jpg
Fig. 3

Maximum velocity and location of Vmax according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F4.jpg
Fig. 4

Maximum shear according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F5.jpg
Fig. 5

Maximum water surface elevation and location of ηmax according to Qa

Table 5.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 1 ~ Case 6)

CaseMaximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)		Maximum Shear
(τmax, kN/m2)		Evaluation
in terms of Vp		Evaluation
in terms of τp
1
(Qa = 0)		9.150.54No GoodNo Good
2
(Qa = Qp)		8.870.56No GoodNo Good
3
(Qa = 0.58Qp)		6.530.40No GoodNo Good
4
(Qa = 0.48Qp)		6.220.36No GoodNo Good
5
(Qa = 0.45Qp)		4.220.12AccpetAccpet
6
(Qa = 0.32Qp)		4.040.14AccpetAccpet

2.3.3 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류량 배분 검토

기존 여수로 및 보조 여수로 단독운영에 따른 하류하천 및 호안의 안정성 평가를 수행한 결과 계획홍수량 방류 시 하류하천 대안부에서 호안 설계 조건(허용유속 및 허용 소류력)을 초과하였으며, 처오름에 의한 수위 상승으로 월류에 대한 위험성 증가를 확인하였다. 따라서 계획 홍수량 조건에서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류량 배분을 통하여 호안 안정성을 확보하고 하류하천에 방류로 인한 피해를 최소화할 수 있는 배분조합(Case 7 ~ Case 10)을 검토하였다. Case 7은 기존 여수로와 보조여수로의 배분 비율을 균등하게 적용한 경우이고, Case 8은 기존 여수로의 배분량이 보조 여수로에 비하여 많은 경우, Case 9는 보조 여수로의 배분량이 기존 여수로에 비하여 많은 경우를 의미한다. 최대유속을 비교한 결과 보조 여수로의 배분 비율이 큰 경우 기존 여수로의 배분량에 의하여 흐름이 하천 중심에 집중되어 대안부의 유속을 저감하는 효과를 확인하였다. 보조여수로의 방류량 배분 비율이 증가할수록 기존 여수로 대안부 측(0.00<X/L<0.27, Section 1) 유속 분포는 감소하였으나, 신규여수로 대안부 측(0.27<X/L<1.00, Section 2) 유속은 증가하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 6 참조). 그러나 유속 저감 효과에도 대안부 전구간에서 설계 허용유속 조건을 초과하여 제방의 안정성을 확보하지는 못하였다. 소류력 산정 결과 유속과 동일하게 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량 보다 크면 감소하는 것을 확인하였고 일부 구간에서는 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 7 참조).

따라서 유속 저감효과가 있는 배분 비율 조건(Qa>Qe)에서 Section 2에 유속 저감에 영향을 미치는 기존 여수로 방류량 배분 비율을 증가시켜 추가 검토(Case 10)를 수행하였다. 단독운영과 비교 시 하류하천에 유입되는 유량은 증가하였음에도 불구하고 기존 여수로 방류량에 의해 흐름이 하천 중심으로 집중되는 현상에 따라 대안부의 유속은 단독 운영에 비하여 감소하는 것을 확인하였고(Fig. 8 참조), 호안 설계 허용유속 및 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하는 구간이 발생하여 호안 안정성도 확보한 것으로 판단되었다. 최종적으로 각 Case 별 수위 결과의 경우 여수로 동시 운영을 수행하게 되면 대안부 전 구간에서 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보하였다(Fig. 9 참조). 각 Case 별 대안부에서 최대 유속결과 및 산정한 소류력은 Table 6에 제시하였다.

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F6.jpg
Fig. 6

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F7.jpg
Fig. 7

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F8.jpg
Fig. 8

Velocity results of FLOW-3D (a: auxiliary spillway operation only , b : simultaneous operation of spillways)

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F9.jpg
Fig. 9

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to Qa

Table 6.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 7 ~ Case 10)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity (Vmax, m/s)Maximum Shear
(τmax, kN/m2)		Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of τp
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
7
Qe : 0.50QpQa : 0.50Qp		8.106.230.640.30No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
8
Qe : 0.61QpQa : 0.39Qp		8.886.410.610.34No GoodNo GoodNo GoodNo Good
9
Qe : 0.39QpQa : 0.61Qp		6.227.330.240.35No GoodNo GoodAcceptNo Good
10
Qe : 0.42QpQa : 0.58Qp		6.394.790.300.19No GoodAcceptNo GoodAccept

2.3.4 방류량 배분 비율의 허용 방류량 검토

계획 홍수량 방류 시 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 배분 비율 검토 결과 Case 10(Qe = 0.42Qp, Qa = 0.58Qp)에서 방류에 따른 하류 하천의 피해를 최소화시킬 수 있는 것을 확인하였다. 그러나 대안부 전 구간에 대하여 호안 설계조건을 만족하지 못하였다. 따라서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 방류 배분 비율을 고정시킨 후 총 방류량을 조절하여 허용 방류량을 검토하였다(Case 11 ~ Case 14).

호안 안정성 측면에서 검토한 결과 계획홍수량 대비 총 방류량이 감소하면 최대 유속 및 최대 소류력이 감소하고 최종적으로 계획 홍수량의 77%를 방류할 경우 하류하천의 대안부에서 호안 설계조건을 모두 만족하는 것을 확인하였다(Fig. 10, Fig. 11 참조). 각 Case 별 대안부에서 최대 유속결과 및 산정한 소류력은 Table 7에 제시하였다. 또한 Case 별 수위 검토 결과 처오름으로 인한 대안부 전 구간에서 월류에 대한 안정성(ηmax/ηref<0.97(=기설제방고))은 확보하였다(Fig. 12 참조).

Table 7.

Numerical results for each cases (Case 11 ~ Case 14)

Case (Qe &amp; Qa)Maximum Velocity
(Vmax, m/s)		Maximum Shear
(τmax, kN/m2)		Evaluation in terms of VpEvaluation in terms of τp
Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2Section 1Section 2
11
Qe : 0.32QpQa : 0.45Qp		3.634.530.090.26AcceptAcceptAcceptAccept
12
Qe : 0.35QpQa : 0.48Qp		5.745.180.230.22No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
13
Qe : 0.38QpQa : 0.53Qp		6.704.210.280.11No GoodAcceptAcceptAccept
14
Qe : 0.41QpQa : 0.56Qp		6.545.240.280.24No GoodNo GoodAcceptAccept
/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F10.jpg
Fig. 10

Maximum velocity on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F11.jpg
Fig. 11

Maximum shear on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

/media/sites/ksds/2021-014-02/N0240140207/images/ksds_14_02_07_F12.jpg
Fig. 12

Maximum water surface elevation on section 1 & 2 according to total outflow

3. 결 론

본 연구에서는 홍수 시 기존 여수로의 노후화로 인한 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대하여 하류하천의 호안 안정성 측면에서 검토하였다. 여수로 방류로 인한 하류하천의 흐름특성을 검토하기 위하여 3차원 수치모형인 FLOW-3D를 활용하였고, 여수로 지형은 치수능력 증대사업을 통하여 완공된 ○○댐의 제원을 이용하였다. 하류하천 조도 계수 및 여수로 방류량은 하천기본계획을 참고하여 적용하였다. 최종적으로 여수로 방류로 인한 하류하천의 피해를 최소화 시킬 수 있는 적절한 보조 여수로의 활용방안을 도출하기 위하여 보조 여수로 단독 운영과 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영에 따른 하류 하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력의 변화를 검토하였다.

수문은 완전 개도 상태에서 방류한다는 가정으로 계획 홍수량 조건에서 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 하류하천 대안부의 유속 및 수위를 검토한 결과 기존 여수로 단독운영에 비하여 최대 유속 및 최대 수위가 감소하는 것을 확인할 수 있었으며, 이는 보조 여수로 단독 운영 시 하류하천으로 유입각도가 작아지고, 유입되는 하천의 폭이 증가되기 때문이다. 그러나 계획 홍수량 조건에서 하천호안 설계기준에서 제시한 허용 유속(5.0 m/s)과 허용 소류력(0.28 kN/m2)과 비교하였을 때 호안 안정성을 확보하지 못하였으며, 계획홍수량의 45% 이하 방류 시에 대안부의 호안 안정성을 확보하였다. 수위의 경우 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서 처오름 현상이 발생하여 월류에 대한 위험성을 확인하였고 이를 통하여 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 방안을 도출하는 것이 중요하다고 판단된다. 따라서 기존 여수로와의 동시 운영 측면에서 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 배분 비율 및 총 방류량을 변화시켜가며 하류 하천의 흐름특성 및 소류력의 변화를 검토하였다. 배분 비율의 경우 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 균등 배분(Case 7) 및 편중 배분(Case 8 & Case 9)을 검토하여 보조 여수로의 방류량이 기존 여수로의 방류량보다 큰 경우 하류하천의 중심부로 집중되어 대안부의 최대유속, 최대소류력 및 최대수위가 감소하는 것을 확인하였다. 이를 근거로 기존 여수로의 방류 비율을 증가(Qe=0.42Qp, Qa=0.58Qp)시켜 검토한 결과 대안부 일부 구간에서 허용 유속 및 허용소류력 조건을 만족하는 것을 확인하였다. 이를 통하여 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로의 동시 운영을 통하여 적절한 방류량 배분 비율을 도출하는 것이 방류로 인한 하류하천의 피해를 저감하는데 효과적인 것으로 판단된다. 그러나 설계홍수량 방류 시 전 구간에서 허용 유속 및 소류력 조건을 만족하지 못하였다. 최종적으로 전체 방류량에서 기존 여수로의 방류 비율을 42%, 보조 여수로의 방류 비율을 58%로 설정하여 허용방류량을 검토한 결과, 계획홍수량의 77%이하로 방류 시 대안부의 최대유속은 기존여수로 방류의 지배영향구간(section 1)에서 3.63 m/s, 기존 여수로와 보조 여수로 방류의 영향구간(section 2)에서 4.53 m/s로 허용유속 조건을 만족하였고, 산정한 소류력도 각각 0.09 kN/m2 및 0.26 kN/m2로 허용 소류력 조건을 만족하여 대안부 호안의 안정성을 확보하였다고 판단된다.

본 연구 결과는 기후변화 및 기존여수로의 노후화로 인하여 홍수 시 기존여수로의 단독운영으로 하류하천의 피해가 발생할 수 있는 현시점에서 치수증대 사업으로 완공된 보조 여수로의 활용방안에 대한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있고, 향후 계획 홍수량 유입 시 최적의 배분 비율 및 허용 방류량 도출에 이용할 수 있다. 다만 본 연구는 여수로 방류에 따른 제방에 작용하는 수충력은 검토하지 못하고, 허용 유속 및 허용소류력은 제방과 유수의 방향이 일정한 구간에 대하여 검토하였다. 또한 여수로 방류에 따른 대안부에서의 영향에 대해서만 검토하였고 수문 전면 개도 조건에서 검토하였다는 한계점은 분명히 있다. 이에 향후에는 다양한 수문 개도 조건 및 방류 시나리오를 적용 및 검토하여 보다 효율적이고, 효과적인 보조 여수로 활용방안을 도출하고자 한다.

Acknowledgements

본 결과물은 K-water에서 수행한 기존 및 신규 여수로 효율적 연계운영 방안 마련(2021-WR-GP-76-149)의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다.

References

1 Busan Construction and Management Administration (2009). Nakdonggang River Master Plan. Busan: BCMA.
2 Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill. New York.
3 Flow Science (2011). Flow3D User Manual. Santa Fe: NM.
4 Jeon, T. M., Kim, H. I., Park, H. S., and Baek, U. I. (2006). Design of Emergency Spillway Using Hydraulic and Numerical Model-ImHa Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1726-1731.
5 Kim, D. G., Park, S. J., Lee, Y. S., and Hwang, J. H. (2008). Spillway Design by Using Numerical Model Experiment – Case Study of AnDong Multipurpose Dam. Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference. 1604-1608.
6 Kim, J. S. (2007). Comparison of Hydraulic Experiment and Numerical Model on Spillway. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.
7 Kim, S. H. and Kim, J. S. (2013). Effect of Chungju Dam Operation for Flood Control in the Upper Han River. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537
8 K-water (2021). Regulations of Dam Management. Daejeon: K-water.
9 K-water and MOLIT (2004). Report on the Establishment of Basic Plan for the Increasing Flood Capacity and Review of Hydrological Stability of Dams. Sejong: K-water and MOLIT.
10 Lee, J. H., Julien, P. Y., and Thornton, C. I. (2019). Interference of Dual Spillways Operations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 145(5): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001593
11 Li, S., Cain, S., Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H., and Wyckoff, R. (2011). Numerical Modeling of Probable Maximum Flood Flowing through a System of Spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 137(1): 66-74. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000279
12 MOLIT (2016). Practice Guidelines of River Construction Design. Sejong: MOLIT.
13 MOLIT (2019). Standards of River Design. Sejong: MOLIT.
14 Prime Minister’s Secretariat (2003). White Book on Flood Damage Prevention Measures. Sejong: PMS.
15 Schoklitsch, A. (1934). Der Geschiebetrieb und Die Geschiebefracht. Wasserkraft Wasserwirtschaft. 4: 1-7.
16 Vanoni, V. A. (Ed.). (2006). Sedimentation Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers. Virginia: ASCE. 10.1061/9780784408230
17 Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Ansar, M., Damisse, E., and González-Castro, J. A. (2017). Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Flow Ratings at Prototype Spillways and Weirs. I: Data Generation and Validation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 143(1): 1-13. 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001112

Korean References Translated from the English

1 건설교통부·한국수자원공사 (2004). 댐의 수문학적 안정성 검토 및 치수능력증대방안 기본계획 수립 보고서. 세종: 국토교통부.
2 국무총리실 수해방지대책단 (2003). 수해방지대책 백서. 세종: 국무총리실.
3 국토교통부 (2016). 하천공사 설계실무요령. 세종: 국토교통부.
4 국토교통부 (2019). 하천설계기준해설. 세종: 국토교통부.
5 김대근, 박선중, 이영식, 황종훈 (2008). 수치모형실험을 이용한 여수로 설계 – 안동다목적댐. 한국수자원학회 학술발표회. 1604-1608.
6 김상호, 김지성 (2013). 충주댐 방류에 따른 댐 상하류 홍수위 영향 분석. 대한토목학회논문집. 33(2): 537-548. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.2.537
7 김주성 (2007). 댐 여수로부 수리 및 수치모형실험 비교 고찰. Water for Future. 40(4): 74-81.
8 부산국토관리청 (2009). 낙동강수계 하천기본계획(변경). 부산: 부산국토관리청.
9 전태명, 김형일, 박형섭, 백운일 (2006). 수리모형실험과 수치모의를 이용한 비상여수로 설계-임하댐. 한국수자원학회 학술발표회. 1726-1731.
10 한국수자원공사 (2021). 댐관리 규정. 대전: 한국수자원공사.

원문 보기
Figure 17. Longitudinal turbulent kinetic energy distribution on the smooth and triangular macroroughnesses: (A) Y/2; (B) Y/6.

Numerical Simulations of the Flow Field of a Submerged Hydraulic Jump over Triangular Macroroughnesses

Triangular Macroroughnesses 대한 잠긴 수압 점프의 유동장 수치 시뮬레이션

by Amir Ghaderi 1,2,Mehdi Dasineh 3,Francesco Aristodemo 2 andCostanza Aricò 4,*1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan 537138791, Iran2Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata, 87036 Rende, Italy3Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh 8311155181, Iran4Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.Academic Editor: Anis YounesWater2021, 13(5), 674; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050674

Abstract

The submerged hydraulic jump is a sudden change from the supercritical to subcritical flow, specified by strong turbulence, air entrainment and energy loss. Despite recent studies, hydraulic jump characteristics in smooth and rough beds, the turbulence, the mean velocity and the flow patterns in the cavity region of a submerged hydraulic jump in the rough beds, especially in the case of triangular macroroughnesses, are not completely understood. The objective of this paper was to numerically investigate via the FLOW-3D model the effects of triangular macroroughnesses on the characteristics of submerged jump, including the longitudinal profile of streamlines, flow patterns in the cavity region, horizontal velocity profiles, streamwise velocity distribution, thickness of the inner layer, bed shear stress coefficient, Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) and energy loss, in different macroroughness arrangements and various inlet Froude numbers (1.7 < Fr1 < 9.3). To verify the accuracy and reliability of the present numerical simulations, literature experimental data were considered.

Keywords: submerged hydraulic jump; triangular macroroughnesses; TKE; bed shear stress coefficient; velocity; FLOW-3D model

수중 유압 점프는 강한 난류, 공기 동반 및 에너지 손실로 지정된 초임계에서 아임계 흐름으로의 급격한 변화입니다. 최근 연구에도 불구하고, 특히 삼각형 거시적 거칠기의 경우, 평활 및 거친 베드에서의 수압 점프 특성, 거친 베드에서 잠긴 수압 점프의 공동 영역에서 난류, 평균 속도 및 유동 패턴이 완전히 이해되지 않았습니다.

이 논문의 목적은 유선의 종방향 프로파일, 캐비티 영역의 유동 패턴, 수평 속도 프로파일, 스트림 방향 속도 분포, 두께를 포함하여 서브머지드 점프의 특성에 대한 삼각형 거시 거칠기의 영향을 FLOW-3D 모델을 통해 수치적으로 조사하는 것이었습니다.

내부 층의 층 전단 응력 계수, 난류 운동 에너지(TKE) 및 에너지 손실, 다양한 거시 거칠기 배열 및 다양한 입구 Froude 수(1.7 < Fr1 < 9.3). 현재 수치 시뮬레이션의 정확성과 신뢰성을 검증하기 위해 문헌 실험 데이터를 고려했습니다.

 Introduction

격렬한 난류 혼합과 기포 동반이 있는 수압 점프는 초임계에서 아임계 흐름으로의 변화 과정으로 간주됩니다[1]. 자유 및 수중 유압 점프는 일반적으로 게이트, 배수로 및 둑과 같은 수력 구조 아래의 에너지 손실에 적합합니다. 매끄러운 베드에서 유압 점프의 특성은 널리 연구되었습니다[2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].

베드의 거칠기 요소가 매끄러운 베드와 비교하여 수압 점프의 특성에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 예측하기 위해 거시적 거칠기에 대한 자유 및 수중 수력 점프에 대해 여러 실험 및 수치 연구가 수행되었습니다. Ead와 Rajaratnam[10]은 사인파 거대 거칠기에 대한 수리학적 점프의 특성을 조사하고 무차원 분석을 통해 수면 프로파일과 배출을 정규화했습니다.

Tokyayet al. [11]은 두 사인 곡선 거대 거칠기에 대한 점프 길이 비율과 에너지 손실이 매끄러운 베드보다 각각 35% 더 작고 6% 더 높다는 것을 관찰했습니다. Abbaspur et al. [12]는 6개의 사인파형 거대 거칠기에 대한 수력학적 점프의 특성을 연구했습니다. 그 결과, 꼬리수심과 점프길이는 평상보다 낮았고 Froude 수는 점프길이에 큰 영향을 미쳤습니다.

Shafai-Bejestan과 Neisi[13]는 수압 점프에 대한 마름모꼴 거대 거칠기의 영향을 조사했습니다. 결과는 마름모꼴 거시 거칠기를 사용하면 매끄러운 침대와 비교하여 꼬리 수심과 점프 길이를 감소시키는 것으로 나타났습니다. Izadjoo와 Shafai-Bejestan[14]은 다양한 사다리꼴 거시 거칠기에 대한 수압 점프를 연구했습니다.

그들은 전단응력계수가 평활층보다 10배 이상 크고 점프길이가 50% 감소하는 것을 관찰하였습니다. Nikmehr과 Aminpour[15]는 Flow-3D 모델 버전 11.2[16]를 사용하여 사다리꼴 블록이 있는 거시적 거칠기에 대한 수력학적 점프의 특성을 조사했습니다. 결과는 거시 거칠기의 높이와 거리가 증가할수록 전단 응력 계수뿐만 아니라 베드 근처에서 속도가 감소하는 것으로 나타났습니다.

Ghaderi et al. [17]은 다양한 형태의 거시 거칠기(삼각형, 정사각형 및 반 타원형)에 대한 자유 및 수중 수력 점프 특성을 연구했습니다. 결과는 Froude 수의 증가에 따라 자유 및 수중 점프에서 전단 응력 계수, 에너지 손실, 수중 깊이, 미수 깊이 및 상대 점프 길이가 증가함을 나타냅니다.

자유 및 수중 점프에서 가장 높은 전단 응력과 에너지 손실은 삼각형의 거시 거칠기가 존재할 때 발생했습니다. Elsebaie와 Shabayek[18]은 5가지 형태의 거시적 거칠기(삼각형, 사다리꼴, 2개의 측면 경사 및 직사각형이 있는 정현파)에 대한 수력학적 점프의 특성을 연구했습니다. 결과는 모든 거시적 거칠기에 대한 에너지 손실이 매끄러운 베드에서보다 15배 이상이라는 것을 보여주었습니다.

Samadi-Boroujeni et al. [19]는 다양한 각도의 6개의 삼각형 거시 거칠기에 대한 수력 점프를 조사한 결과 삼각형 거시 거칠기가 평활 베드에 비해 점프 길이를 줄이고 에너지 손실과 베드 전단 응력 계수를 증가시키는 것으로 나타났습니다.

Ahmed et al. [20]은 매끄러운 베드와 삼각형 거시 거칠기에서 수중 수력 점프 특성을 조사했습니다. 결과는 부드러운 침대와 비교할 때 잠긴 깊이와 점프 길이가 감소했다고 밝혔습니다. 표 1은 다른 연구자들이 제시한 과거의 유압 점프에 대한 실험 및 수치 연구의 세부 사항을 나열합니다.

Table 1. Main characteristics of some past experimental and numerical studies on hydraulic jumps.

ReferenceShape Bed-Channel Type-
Jump Type		Channel Dimension (m)Roughness (mm)Fr1Investigated Flow
Properties
Ead and Rajaratnam [10]-Smooth and rough beds-Rectangular channel-Free jumpCL1 = 7.60
CW2 = 0.44
CH3 = 0.60		-Corrugated sheets (RH4 = 13 and 22)4–10-Upstream and tailwater depths-Jump length-Roller length-Velocity-Water surface profile
Tokyay et al. [11]-Smooth and rough beds-Rectangular channel-Free jumpCL = 10.50
CW = 0.253
CH = 0.432		-Two sinusoidal corrugated (RH = 10 and 13)5–12-Depth ratio-Jump length-Energy loss
Izadjoo and Shafai-Bejestan [14]-Smooth and rough beds-Two rectangular-channel-Free jumpCL = 1.2, 9
CW = 0.25, 0.50
CH = 0.40		Baffle with trapezoidal cross section
(RH: 13 and 26)		6–12-Upstream and tailwater depths-Jump length-Velocity-Bed shear stress coefficient
Abbaspour et al. [12]-Horizontal bed with slope 0.002-Rectangular channel—smooth and rough beds-Free jumpCL = 10
CW = 0.25
CH = 0.50		-Sinusoidal bed (RH = 15,20, 25 and 35)3.80–8.60-Water surface profile-Depth ratio-Jump length-Energy loss-Velocity profiles-Bed shear stress coefficient
Shafai-Bejestan and Neisi [13]-Smooth and rough beds-Rectangular channel-Free jumpCL = 7.50
CW = 0.35
CH = 0.50		Lozenge bed4.50–12-Sequent depth-Jump length
Elsebaie and Shabayek [18]-Smooth and rough beds-Rectangular channel-With side slopes of 45 degrees for two trapezoidal and triangular macroroughnesses and of 60 degrees for other trapezoidal macroroughnesses-Free jumpCL = 9
CW = 0.295
CH = 0.32		-Sinusoidal-Triangular-Trapezoidal with two side-Rectangular-(RH = 18 and corrugation wavelength = 65)50-Water surface profile-Sequent depth-Jump length-Bed shear stress coefficient
Samadi-Boroujeni et al. [19]-Rectangular channel-Smooth and rough beds-Free jumpCL = 12
CW = 0.40
CH = 0.40		-Six triangular corrugated (RH = 2.5)6.10–13.10-Water surface profile-Sequent depth-Jump length-Energy loss-Velocity profiles-Bed shear stress coefficient
Ahmed et al. [20]-Smooth and rough beds-Rectangular channel-Submerged jumpCL = 24.50
CW = 0.75
CH = 0.70		-Triangular corrugated sheet (RH = 40)1.68–9.29-Conjugated and tailwater depths-Submerged ratio-Deficit depth-Relative jump length-Jump length-Relative roller jump length-Jump efficiency-Bed shear stress coefficient
Nikmehr and Aminpour [15]-Horizontal bed with slope 0.002-Rectangular channel-Rough bed-Free jumpCL = 12
CW = 0.25
CH = 0.50		-Trapezoidal blocks (RH = 2, 3 and 4)5.01–13.70-Water surface profile-Sequent depth-Jump length-Roller length-Velocity
Ghaderi et al. [17]-Smooth and rough beds-Rectangular channel-Free and submerged jumpCL = 4.50
CW = 0.75
CH = 0.70		-Triangular, square and semi-oval macroroughnesses (RH = 40 and distance of roughness of I = 40, 80, 120, 160 and 200)1.70–9.30-Horizontal velocity distributions-Bed shear stress coefficient-Sequent depth ratio and submerged depth ratio-Jump length-Energy loss
Present studyRectangular channel
Smooth and rough beds
Submerged jump		CL = 4.50
CW = 0.75
CH = 0.70		-Triangular macroroughnesses (RH = 40 and distance of roughness of I = 40, 80, 120, 160 and 200)1.70–9.30-Longitudinal profile of streamlines-Flow patterns in the cavity region-Horizontal velocity profiles-Streamwise velocity distribution-Bed shear stress coefficient-TKE-Thickness of the inner layer-Energy loss

CL1: channel length, CW2: channel width, CH3: channel height, RH4: roughness height.

이전에 논의된 조사의 주요 부분은 실험실 접근 방식을 기반으로 하며 사인파, 마름모꼴, 사다리꼴, 정사각형, 직사각형 및 삼각형 매크로 거칠기가 공액 깊이, 잠긴 깊이, 점프 길이, 에너지 손실과 같은 일부 자유 및 수중 유압 점프 특성에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 조사합니다.

베드 및 전단 응력 계수. 더욱이, 저자[17]에 의해 다양한 형태의 거시적 거칠기에 대한 수력학적 점프에 대한 이전 발표된 논문을 참조하면, 삼각형의 거대조도는 가장 높은 층 전단 응력 계수 및 에너지 손실을 가지며 또한 가장 낮은 잠긴 깊이, tailwater를 갖는 것으로 관찰되었습니다.

다른 거친 모양, 즉 정사각형 및 반 타원형과 부드러운 침대에 비해 깊이와 점프 길이. 따라서 본 논문에서는 삼각형 매크로 거칠기를 사용하여(일정한 거칠기 높이가 T = 4cm이고 삼각형 거칠기의 거리가 I = 4, 8, 12, 16 및 20cm인 다른 T/I 비율에 대해), 특정 캐비티 영역의 유동 패턴, 난류 운동 에너지(TKE) 및 흐름 방향 속도 분포와 같은 연구가 필요합니다.

CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics) 방법은 자유 및 수중 유압 점프[21]와 같은 복잡한 흐름의 모델링 프로세스를 수행하는 중요한 도구로 등장하며 수중 유압 점프의 특성은 CFD 시뮬레이션을 사용하여 정확하게 예측할 수 있습니다 [22,23 ].

본 논문은 초기에 수중 유압 점프의 주요 특성, 수치 모델에 대한 입력 매개변수 및 Ahmed et al.의 참조 실험 조사를 제시합니다. [20], 검증 목적으로 보고되었습니다. 또한, 본 연구에서는 유선의 종방향 프로파일, 캐비티 영역의 유동 패턴, 수평 속도 프로파일, 내부 층의 두께, 베드 전단 응력 계수, TKE 및 에너지 손실과 같은 특성을 조사할 것입니다.

Figure 1. Definition sketch of a submerged hydraulic jump at triangular macroroughnesses.
Figure 1. Definition sketch of a submerged hydraulic jump at triangular macroroughnesses.

Table 2. Effective parameters in the numerical model.

Bed TypeQ
(l/s)		I
(cm)		T (cm)d (cm)y1
(cm)		y4
(cm)		Fr1= u1/(gy1)0.5SRe1= (u1y1)/υ
Smooth30, 45––51.62–3.839.64–32.101.7–9.30.26–0.5039,884–59,825
Triangular macroroughnesses30, 454, 8, 12, 16, 20451.62–3.846.82–30.081.7–9.30.21–0.4439,884–59,825
Figure 2. Longitudinal profile of the experimental flume (Ahmed et al. [20]).
Figure 2. Longitudinal profile of the experimental flume (Ahmed et al. [20]).

Table 3. Main flow variables for the numerical and physical models (Ahmed et al. [20]).

ModelsBed TypeQ (l/s)d (cm)y1 (cm)u1 (m/s)Fr1
Numerical and PhysicalSmooth4551.62–3.831.04–3.701.7–9.3
T/I = 0.54551.61–3.831.05–3.711.7–9.3
T/I = 0.254551.60–3.841.04–3.711.7–9.3
Figure 3. The boundary conditions governing the simulations.
Figure 3. The boundary conditions governing the simulations.
Figure 4. Sketch of mesh setup.
Figure 4. Sketch of mesh setup.

Table 4. Characteristics of the computational grids.

MeshNested Block Cell Size (cm)Containing Block Cell Size (cm)
10.551.10
20.651.30
30.851.70

Table 5. The numerical results of mesh convergence analysis.

ParametersAmounts
fs1 (-)7.15
fs2 (-)6.88
fs3 (-)6.19
K (-)5.61
E32 (%)10.02
E21 (%)3.77
GCI21 (%)3.03
GCI32 (%)3.57
GCI32/rp GCI210.98
Figure 5. Time changes of the flow discharge in the inlet and outlet boundaries conditions (A): Q = 0.03 m3/s (B): Q = 0.045 m3/s.
Figure 5. Time changes of the flow discharge in the inlet and outlet boundaries conditions (A): Q = 0.03 m3/s (B): Q = 0.045 m3/s.
Figure 6. The evolutionary process of a submerged hydraulic jump on the smooth bed—Q = 0.03 m3/s.
Figure 6. The evolutionary process of a submerged hydraulic jump on the smooth bed—Q = 0.03 m3/s.
Figure 7. Numerical versus experimental basic parameters of the submerged hydraulic jump. (A): y3/y1; and (B): y4/y1.
Figure 7. Numerical versus experimental basic parameters of the submerged hydraulic jump. (A): y3/y1; and (B): y4/y1.
Figure 8. Velocity vector field and flow pattern through the gate in a submerged hydraulic jump condition: (A) smooth bed; (B) triangular macroroughnesses.
Figure 8. Velocity vector field and flow pattern through the gate in a submerged hydraulic jump condition: (A) smooth bed; (B) triangular macroroughnesses.
Figure 9. Velocity vector distributions in the x–z plane (y = 0) within the cavity region.
Figure 9. Velocity vector distributions in the x–z plane (y = 0) within the cavity region.
Figure 10. Typical vertical distribution of the mean horizontal velocity in a submerged hydraulic jump [46].
Figure 10. Typical vertical distribution of the mean horizontal velocity in a submerged hydraulic jump [46].
Figure 11. Typical horizontal velocity profiles in a submerged hydraulic jump on smooth bed and triangular macroroughnesses.
Figure 11. Typical horizontal velocity profiles in a submerged hydraulic jump on smooth bed and triangular macroroughnesses.
Figure 12. Horizontal velocity distribution at different distances from the sluice gate for the different T/I for Fr1 = 6.1
Figure 12. Horizontal velocity distribution at different distances from the sluice gate for the different T/I for Fr1 = 6.1
Figure 13. Stream-wise velocity distribution for the triangular macroroughnesses with T/I = 0.5 and 0.25.
Figure 13. Stream-wise velocity distribution for the triangular macroroughnesses with T/I = 0.5 and 0.25.
Figure 14. Dimensionless horizontal velocity distribution in the submerged hydraulic jump for different Froude numbers in triangular macroroughnesses.
Figure 14. Dimensionless horizontal velocity distribution in the submerged hydraulic jump for different Froude numbers in triangular macroroughnesses.
Figure 15. Spatial variations of (umax/u1) and (δ⁄y1).
Figure 15. Spatial variations of (umax/u1) and (δ⁄y1).
Figure 16. The shear stress coefficient (ε) versus the inlet Froude number (Fr1).
Figure 16. The shear stress coefficient (ε) versus the inlet Froude number (Fr1).
Figure 17. Longitudinal turbulent kinetic energy distribution on the smooth and triangular macroroughnesses: (A) Y/2; (B) Y/6.
Figure 17. Longitudinal turbulent kinetic energy distribution on the smooth and triangular macroroughnesses: (A) Y/2; (B) Y/6.
Figure 18. The energy loss (EL/E3) of the submerged jump versus inlet Froude number (Fr1).
Figure 18. The energy loss (EL/E3) of the submerged jump versus inlet Froude number (Fr1).

Conclusions

  • 본 논문에서는 유선의 종방향 프로파일, 공동 영역의 유동 패턴, 수평 속도 프로파일, 스트림 방향 속도 분포, 내부 층의 두께, 베드 전단 응력 계수, 난류 운동 에너지(TKE)를 포함하는 수중 유압 점프의 특성을 제시하고 논의했습니다. ) 및 삼각형 거시적 거칠기에 대한 에너지 손실. 이러한 특성은 FLOW-3D® 모델을 사용하여 수치적으로 조사되었습니다. 자유 표면을 시뮬레이션하기 위한 VOF(Volume of Fluid) 방법과 난류 RNG k-ε 모델이 구현됩니다. 본 모델을 검증하기 위해 평활층과 삼각형 거시 거칠기에 대해 수치 시뮬레이션과 실험 결과를 비교했습니다. 본 연구의 다음과 같은 결과를 도출할 수 있다.
  • 개발 및 개발 지역의 삼각형 거시 거칠기의 흐름 패턴은 수중 유압 점프 조건의 매끄러운 바닥과 비교하여 더 작은 영역에서 동일합니다. 삼각형의 거대 거칠기는 거대 거칠기 사이의 공동 영역에서 또 다른 시계 방향 와류의 형성으로 이어집니다.
  • T/I = 1, 0.5 및 0.33과 같은 거리에 대해 속도 벡터 분포는 캐비티 영역에서 시계 방향 소용돌이를 표시하며, 여기서 속도의 크기는 평균 유속보다 훨씬 작습니다. 삼각형 거대 거칠기(T/I = 0.25 및 0.2) 사이의 거리를 늘리면 캐비티 영역에 크기가 다른 두 개의 소용돌이가 형성됩니다.
  • 삼각형 거시조도 사이의 거리가 충분히 길면 흐름이 다음 조도에 도달할 때까지 속도 분포가 회복됩니다. 그러나 짧은 거리에서 흐름은 속도 분포의 적절한 회복 없이 다음 거칠기에 도달합니다. 따라서 거시 거칠기 사이의 거리가 감소함에 따라 마찰 계수의 증가율이 감소합니다.
  • 삼각형의 거시적 거칠기에서, 잠수 점프의 지정된 섹션에서 최대 속도는 자유 점프보다 높은 값으로 이어집니다. 또한, 수중 점프에서 두 가지 유형의 베드(부드러움 및 거친 베드)에 대해 깊이 및 와류 증가로 인해 베드로부터의 최대 속도 거리는 감소합니다. 잠수 점프에서 경계층 두께는 자유 점프보다 얇습니다.
  • 매끄러운 베드의 난류 영역은 게이트로부터의 거리에 따라 생성되고 자유 표면 롤러 영역 근처에서 발생하는 반면, 거시적 거칠기에서는 난류가 게이트 근처에서 시작되어 더 큰 강도와 제한된 스위프 영역으로 시작됩니다. 이는 반시계 방향 순환의 결과입니다. 거시 거칠기 사이의 공간에서 자유 표면 롤러 및 시계 방향 와류.
  • 삼각 거시 거칠기에서 침지 점프의 베드 전단 응력 계수와 에너지 손실은 유입구 Froude 수의 증가에 따라 증가하는 매끄러운 베드에서 발견된 것보다 더 큽니다. T/I = 0.50 및 0.20에서 최고 및 최저 베드 전단 응력 계수 및 에너지 손실이 평활 베드에 비해 거칠기 요소의 거리가 증가함에 따라 발생합니다.
  • 거의 거칠기 요소가 있는 삼각형 매크로 거칠기의 존재에 의해 주어지는 점프 길이와 잠긴 수심 및 꼬리 수심의 감소는 결과적으로 크기, 즉 길이 및 높이가 감소하는 정수조 설계에 사용될 수 있습니다.
  • 일반적으로 CFD 모델은 다양한 수력 조건 및 기하학적 배열을 고려하여 잠수 점프의 특성 예측을 시뮬레이션할 수 있습니다. 캐비티 영역의 흐름 패턴, 흐름 방향 및 수평 속도 분포, 베드 전단 응력 계수, TKE 및 유압 점프의 에너지 손실은 수치적 방법으로 시뮬레이션할 수 있습니다. 그러나 거시적 차원과 유동장 및 공동 유동의 변화에 ​​대한 다양한 배열에 대한 연구는 향후 과제로 남아 있다.

References

  1. White, F.M. Viscous Fluid Flow, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill University of Rhode Island: Montreal, QC, Canada, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  2. Launder, B.E.; Rodi, W. The turbulent wall jet. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 1979, 19, 81–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McCorquodale, J.A. Hydraulic jumps and internal flows. In Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics; Cheremisinoff, N.P., Ed.; Golf Publishing: Houston, TX, USA, 1986; pp. 120–173. [Google Scholar]
  4. Federico, I.; Marrone, S.; Colagrossi, A.; Aristodemo, F.; Antuono, M. Simulating 2D open-channel flows through an SPH model. Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 2012, 34, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, S.A. An analytical analysis of hydraulic jump in triangular channel: A proposed model. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 2013, 94, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mortazavi, M.; Le Chenadec, V.; Moin, P.; Mani, A. Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent hydraulic jump: Turbulence statistics and air entrainment. J. Fluid Mech. 2016, 797, 60–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Daneshfaraz, R.; Ghahramanzadeh, A.; Ghaderi, A.; Joudi, A.R.; Abraham, J. Investigation of the effect of edge shape on characteristics of flow under vertical gates. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 2016, 108, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Azimi, H.; Shabanlou, S.; Kardar, S. Characteristics of hydraulic jump in U-shaped channels. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2017, 42, 3751–3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Padova, D.; Mossa, M.; Sibilla, S. SPH numerical investigation of characteristics of hydraulic jumps. Environ. Fluid Mech. 2018, 18, 849–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ead, S.A.; Rajaratnam, N. Hydraulic jumps on corrugated beds. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2002, 128, 656–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tokyay, N.D. Effect of channel bed corrugations on hydraulic jumps. In Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2005, Anchorage, AK, USA, 15–19 May 2005; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  12. Abbaspour, A.; Dalir, A.H.; Farsadizadeh, D.; Sadraddini, A.A. Effect of sinusoidal corrugated bed on hydraulic jump characteristics. J. Hydro-Environ. Res. 2009, 3, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shafai-Bejestan, M.S.; Neisi, K. A new roughened bed hydraulic jump stilling basin. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 2009, 2, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Izadjoo, F.; Shafai-Bejestan, M. Corrugated bed hydraulic jump stilling basin. J. Appl. Sci. 2007, 7, 1164–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nikmehr, S.; Aminpour, Y. Numerical Simulation of Hydraulic Jump over Rough Beds. Period. Polytech. Civil Eng. 2017, 64, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Flow Science Inc. FLOW-3D V 11.2 User’s Manual; Flow Science Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghaderi, A.; Dasineh, M.; Aristodemo, F.; Ghahramanzadeh, A. Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps over different macroroughnesses. J. Hydroinform. 2020, 22, 1554–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elsebaie, I.H.; Shabayek, S. Formation of hydraulic jumps on corrugated beds. Int. J. Civil Environ. Eng. IJCEE–IJENS 2010, 10, 37–47. [Google Scholar]
  19. Samadi-Boroujeni, H.; Ghazali, M.; Gorbani, B.; Nafchi, R.F. Effect of triangular corrugated beds on the hydraulic jump characteristics. Can. J. Civil Eng. 2013, 40, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmed, H.M.A.; El Gendy, M.; Mirdan, A.M.H.; Ali, A.A.M.; Haleem, F.S.F.A. Effect of corrugated beds on characteristics of submerged hydraulic jump. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2014, 5, 1033–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Viti, N.; Valero, D.; Gualtieri, C. Numerical simulation of hydraulic jumps. Part 2: Recent results and future outlook. Water 2019, 11, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gumus, V.; Simsek, O.; Soydan, N.G.; Akoz, M.S.; Kirkgoz, M.S. Numerical modeling of submerged hydraulic jump from a sluice gate. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2016, 142, 04015037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jesudhas, V.; Roussinova, V.; Balachandar, R.; Barron, R. Submerged hydraulic jump study using DES. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2017, 143, 04016091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rajaratnam, N. The hydraulic jump as a wall jet. J. Hydraul. Div. 1965, 91, 107–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hager, W.H. Energy Dissipaters and Hydraulic Jump; Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 185–224. [Google Scholar]
  26. Long, D.; Steffler, P.M.; Rajaratnam, N. LDA study of flow structure in submerged Hydraulic jumps. J. Hydraul. Res. 1990, 28, 437–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chow, V.T. Open Channel Hydraulics; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilcox, D.C. Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 3rd ed.; DCW Industries, Inc.: La Canada, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hirt, C.W.; Nichols, B.D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 1981, 39, 201–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pourshahbaz, H.; Abbasi, S.; Pandey, M.; Pu, J.H.; Taghvaei, P.; Tofangdar, N. Morphology and hydrodynamics numerical simulation around groynes. ISH J. Hydraul. Eng. 2020, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choufu, L.; Abbasi, S.; Pourshahbaz, H.; Taghvaei, P.; Tfwala, S. Investigation of flow, erosion, and sedimentation pattern around varied groynes under different hydraulic and geometric conditions: A numerical study. Water 2019, 11, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhenwei, Z.; Haixia, L. Experimental investigation on the anisotropic tensorial eddy viscosity model for turbulence flow. Int. J. Heat Technol. 2016, 34, 186–190. [Google Scholar]
  33. Carvalho, R.; Lemos Ramo, C. Numerical computation of the flow in hydraulic jump stilling basins. J. Hydraul. Res. 2008, 46, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bayon, A.; Valero, D.; García-Bartual, R.; López-Jiménez, P.A. Performance assessment of Open FOAM and FLOW-3D in the numerical modeling of a low Reynolds number hydraulic jump. Environ. Model. Softw. 2016, 80, 322–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Daneshfaraz, R.; Ghaderi, A.; Akhtari, A.; Di Francesco, S. On the Effect of Block Roughness in Ogee Spillways with Flip Buckets. Fluids 2020, 5, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghaderi, A.; Abbasi, S. CFD simulation of local scouring around airfoil-shaped bridge piers with and without collar. Sādhanā 2019, 44, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ghaderi, A.; Daneshfaraz, R.; Dasineh, M.; Di Francesco, S. Energy Dissipation and Hydraulics of Flow over Trapezoidal–Triangular Labyrinth Weirs. Water 2020, 12, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ghaderi, A.; Abbasi, S.; Abraham, J.; Azamathulla, H.M. Efficiency of trapezoidal labyrinth shaped stepped spillways. Flow Meas. Instrum. 2020, 72, 101711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yakhot, V.; Orszag, S.A. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. basic theory. J. Sci. Comput. 1986, 1, 3–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Biscarini, C.; Di Francesco, S.; Ridolfi, E.; Manciola, P. On the simulation of floods in a narrow bending valley: The malpasset dam break case study. Water 2016, 8, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghaderi, A.; Daneshfaraz, R.; Abbasi, S.; Abraham, J. Numerical analysis of the hydraulic characteristics of modified labyrinth weirs. Int. J. Energy Water Resour. 2020, 4, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alfonsi, G. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for turbulence modeling. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2009, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Abbasi, S.; Fatemi, S.; Ghaderi, A.; Di Francesco, S. The Effect of Geometric Parameters of the Antivortex on a Triangular Labyrinth Side Weir. Water 2021, 13, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Celik, I.B.; Ghia, U.; Roache, P.J. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J. Fluids Eng. 2008, 130, 0780011–0780013. [Google Scholar]
  45. Khan, M.I.; Simons, R.R.; Grass, A.J. Influence of cavity flow regimes on turbulence diffusion coefficient. J. Vis. 2006, 9, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Javanappa, S.K.; Narasimhamurthy, V.D. DNS of plane Couette flow with surface roughness. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Appl. Math. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nasrabadi, M.; Omid, M.H.; Farhoudi, J. Submerged hydraulic jump with sediment-laden flow. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2012, 27, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pourabdollah, N.; Heidarpour, M.; Abedi Koupai, J. Characteristics of free and submerged hydraulic jumps in different stilling basins. In Water Management; Thomas Telford Ltd.: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rajaratnam, N. Turbulent Jets; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  50. Aristodemo, F.; Marrone, S.; Federico, I. SPH modeling of plane jets into water bodies through an inflow/outflow algorithm. Ocean Eng. 2015, 105, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shekari, Y.; Javan, M.; Eghbalzadeh, A. Three-dimensional numerical study of submerged hydraulic jumps. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2014, 39, 6969–6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khan, A.A.; Steffler, P.M. Physically based hydraulic jump model for depth-averaged computations. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1996, 122, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. De Dios, M.; Bombardelli, F.A.; García, C.M.; Liscia, S.O.; Lopardo, R.A.; Parravicini, J.A. Experimental characterization of three-dimensional flow vortical structures in submerged hydraulic jumps. J. Hydro-Environ. Res. 2017, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
PDF View
Fig. 1. Nysted Offshore Wind Farm

FLOW-3D 모형을 이용한 해상풍력기초 세굴현상 분석

박영진1, 김태원2*1 서일대학교 토목공학과, 2 (주)지티이

Analysis of Scour Phenomenon around Offshore Wind Foundation using Flow-3D Mode

Abstract

국내․외에서 다양한 형태의 석유 대체에너지는 온실효과 가스를 배출하지 않는 청정에너지로 개발되고 있으며, 특히 해상풍력은 풍력 자원이 풍부하고 육상보다 풍력 감소가 상대적으로 작아 다양하게 연구되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 해상 풍력기초의 세굴현상을 분석하기 위해서 Flow-3D 모형을 이용하여 모노 파일과 삼각대 파일 기초에 대하여 수치모의를 수행 하였다. 직경이 다른(D=5.0 m, d=1.69 m) 모노 파일 형식과 직경이 동일한(D=5.0 m) 모노파일에 대하여 세굴현상을 평가하 였다. 수치해석 결과, 동일한 직경을 가진 모노파일에서 하강류가 증가되었으며, 최대세굴심은 약 1.7배 이상 발생하였다. 삼각대 파일에 대하여 관측유속과 극치파랑 조건을 상류경계조건으로 각각 적용한 후 세굴현상을 평가하였다. 극치파랑조건 을 적용한 경우 최대 세굴심은 약 1.3배 정도 깊게 발생하였다. LES 모형을 적용하였을 경우 세굴심은 평형상태에 도달한 반면, RNG  모형은 해석영역 내 전반적으로 세굴현상이 발생하였으며, 세굴심은 평형상태에 도달하지 않았다. 해상풍 력기초에 대하여 세굴현상을 평가하기 위해서 수치모형 적용시 파랑조건 및 LES 난류모형을 적용하는 것이 타당할 것으로 판단된다.

Various types of alternative energy sources to petroleum are being developed both domestically and internationally as clean energy that does not emit greenhouse gases. In particular, offshore wind power has been studied because the wind resources are relatively limitless and the wind power is relatively smaller than onshore. In this study, to analyze the scour phenomenon around offshore wind foundations, mono pile and tripod pile foundations were simulated using a FLOW-3D model. The scour phenomenon was evaluated for mono piles: one is a pile with a 5 m diameter and d=1.69 m and the other is a pile with a 5 m diameter. Numerical analysis showed that in the latter, the falling-flow increased and the maximum scour depth occurred more than 1.7 times. For a tripod pile foundation, the measured velocity and the maximum wave condition were applied to the upstream boundary condition, respectively, and the scour phenomenon was evaluated. When the maximum wave condition was applied, the maximum scour depth occurred more than about 1.3 times. When the LES model was applied, the scour depth reached equilibrium, whereas the numerical results of the RNG model show that the scour phenomenon occurred in the entire boundary area and the scour depth did not reach equilibrium. To evaluate the scour phenomenon around offshore wind foundations, it is reasonable to apply the wave condition and the LES turbulence model to numerical model applications.

Keywords : Flow-3D, LES model, Mono pile, Offshore wind foundation, RNG k-e model, Scour phenomenon, Tripod pile

서론

지구환경문제에 대한 관심이 증가되고 있는 현실에 서, 풍력발전은 석유 대체에너지로서 뿐만 아니라, 이산 화탄소 등 온실효과 가스를 배출하지 않는 청청에너지의 발전방식으로 국내․외에서 개발이 증가되고 있다. 특 히, 해상풍력은 풍력 자원이 풍부하고, 육상보다 풍력 감 소가 상대적으로 작아 전기 출력량이 크기 때문에 신재 생에너지원 확보 차원에서 국내․외 해상풍력단지 사업 계획이 수립되어 추진되고 있는 실정이다. Fig. 1은 세계 최대 네델란드 해상풍력단지인 Nysted Offshore Wind Farm의 사진이다.

Fig. 1. Nysted Offshore Wind Farm
Fig. 1. Nysted Offshore Wind Farm

하천 내 교각 주변에서 세굴 현상은 발생하며 교각의 안정성 측면에서 세굴보호공을 설치한다. 해양에서 해상 풍력발전 기초를 설치할 경우 구조물로 인해 교란된 흐 름은 세굴을 유발시킨다. 따라서 해상풍력기초를 계획할 경우 안정성 측면에서 세굴현상을 검토할 필요가 있다. 특히 하천의 경우 교각 세굴보호공에 대하여 다양한 공 법들이 설계에 반영되고 있으나, 해양구조물 기초에 대 한 연구는 미흡한 상태이다.

이에 본 연구에서는 수치모 형을 이용하여 해상풍력기초에 대한 세굴현상을 분석하 였다. 수치모형을 이용하여 세굴현상을 예측함에 있어서 본 연구와 연관된 연구동향으로는 양원준과 최성욱(2002) 은 FLOW-3D 모형을 이용하여 세굴영향 평가를 함에 있어서 난류모형을 비교․분석 하였다. 전반적으로 수리 모형실험 자료와 좀 더 잘 일치하는 난류모형은 LES 모 형으로 분석되었다[1]. 여창건 등(2010)은 세굴영향 평 가를 위해 FLOW-3D 모형을 이용할 경우 세굴에 미치 는 중요한 인자에 대하여 매개변수 민감도분석을 수행하 였다.

검토결과, 세굴에 민감한 변수는 유사의 입경, 세 굴조절계수, 안식각 등의 순서로 민감한 것으로 검토되 었다[2]. 오명학 등(2012)은 해상풍력발전기초 시설 주 변에서 FLOW-3D 모형을 이용하여 세굴영향 검토를 수 행하였다. 오명학 등이 검토한 지역은 본 연구 지역과 동 일한 지역이나 경계조건 및 세굴평가에서 가장 중요한 평균입경이 다르다. 세굴검토를 위해 수치모형에 입력한 경계조건은 대조기 창조 최강유속 1.0 m/s을 상류경계조 건으로, 평균입경은 0.0353 mm를 적용하였다. 이와 같은 조건에서 모노파일에서 발생하는 최대세굴심은 약 5.24 m로 분석되었다[3].

Stahlmann과 Schlurmann(2010)은 본 과업에서 적용할 해상풍력기초와 유사한 기초를 가진 구조물에 대하여 수리모형실험을 수행하였다. 연구대상 지역은 독일 해안가에 의한 해상풍력단지에 대하여 삼각 대 형식의 해상풍력기초에 대하여 1/40과 1/12 축척으로 각각 수리모형실험을 수행하였다. 1/40과 1/12 축척에 따라서 세굴분포양상 및 최대세굴심의 위치가 다르게 관 측되었다[4].

본 연구에서는 3차원 수치모형인 Flow-3D를 이용하 여 세굴현상을 평가함에 있어서, 파일 형상 변화, 경계조 건이 다른 경우 및 서로 다른 난류모형을 적용하였을 경 우에 대하여 수치해석이 국부세굴 현상에 미치는 영향을 검토하였다. 이와 같은 연구는 향후 수치모형을 이용하 여 해상풍력발전 기초에 대하여 세굴현상을 평가함에 있 어서 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Fig. 2. Shape of Pile
Fig. 2. Shape of Pile
Fig. 3. Boundary Area and Grid of Flow-3D
Fig. 3. Boundary Area and Grid of Flow-3D
Fig. 4. Scour around Monopile
Fig. 4. Scour around Monopile
Fig. 5. Velocity Development around Monopile
Fig. 5. Velocity Development around Monopile
Fig. 6. Flow Phenomenon and Scour around Tripod Pile Foundation
Fig. 6. Flow Phenomenon and Scour around Tripod Pile Foundation
Fig. 7. Scour according to Turbulence Models(RNG k-e & LES Model)
Fig. 7. Scour according to Turbulence Models(RNG k-e & LES Model)

결론

본 연구에서는 해상풍력기초 형식이 모노파일과 삼각 대 파일일 경우 세굴현상을 평가하기 위해서 3차원 수치 모형인 Flow-3D를 이용하였다. 직경이 서로 다른(D=5.0 m, d=1.69 m) 모노파일과 직경이 동일한(D=5.0 m) 모노파일에 대하여 LES 모형 을 적용하여 세굴현상을 평가하였다. 서로 다른 직경을 가진 모노파일 주변에서 최대 세굴심은 4.13 m, 동일한 직경을 가진 모노파일 주변에서는 7.13 m의 최대 세굴 심이 발생하였다. 또한 동일한 직경을 가진 파일에서 하 강류가 증가되어 최대세굴심이 증가된 것으로 분석되었 다. 수치해석 결과, 세굴에 대한 기초의 안정성 측면에서 서로 다른 직경을 가진 기초 형식이 유리한 것으로 분석 되었다. 수치모형을 이용하여 세굴현상을 평가함에 있어서 경 계조건 및 난류모형의 선정은 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 서로 다른 직경을 가진 삼각대 형식의 해상풍력기초에 대하여 상류경계조건으로 관측유속과 극치파랑조건을 각각 적용하였을 경우 세굴현상을 평가하였다. 극치파랑 조건을 적용하였을 경우가 최대세굴심이 약 1.3배 정도 깊게 발생하였다. 또한 극치파랑조건에서 RNG 과 LES 모형을 적용하여 세굴현상을 평가하였다. LES 모 형을 적용하였을 경우 파일 주변에서 세굴현상이 발생하 였으며, 세굴심은 일정시간이 경과된 후에는 증가되지 않는 평형상태에 도달하였다. 그러나 RNG 모형을 적용한 경우는 평형상태에 도달하지 않고 계속해서 세굴 이 진행되어 세굴심을 평가할 수 없었다. 현재 해양구조 물 기초에 대한 세굴현상 연구는 미흡한 상태로 하천에 서 교각 세굴현상을 검토하기 위해서 적용되는 경계조건 을 적용하기보다는 해상 조건인 파랑조건을 적용하여 검 토하는 것이 기초의 안정성 측면에서 유리할 것으로 판 단된다. 또한 정확한 세굴현상을 예측하기 위해서는 RNG 모형보다는 LES 모형을 적용하는 것이 타당 할 것으로 판단된다. 향후 해상풍력기초에 대한 세굴관측을 수행하여 수치 모의 결과와 비교․분석이 필요하며, 또한 다양한 파랑 조건에서 난류모형에 대한 비교․분석이 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

References

[1] W. J. Yang, S. U. Choi. “Three- Dimensional Numerical
Simulation of Local Scour around the Bridge Pier using
Large Eddy Simulation”, Journal of KWRA, vol. 22, no.
4-B, pp. 437-446, 2002.
[2] C. G. Yeo, J. E. Lee, S. O. Lee, J. W. Song. “Sensitivity
Analysis of Sediment Scour Model in Flow-3D”,
Proceedings of KWRA, pp. 1750-1754, 2010.
[3] M. H. Oh, O. S. Kwon, W. M. Jeong, K. S. Lee.
“FLOW-3D Analysis on Scouring around Offshore Wind
Foundation”, Journal of KAIS, vol. 13, no. 3, pp.
1346-1351, 2012.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.3.1346

[4] A. Stahlmann, T. Schlurmann, “Physical Modeling of
Scour around Tripod Foundation Structures for Offshore
Wind Energy Converters”, Proceedings of 32nd
Conference on Coastal Engineering, Shanghai, China,
no. 32, pp. 1-12, 2010.
[5] Flow Science. Flow-3D User’s Manual. Los Alamos,
NM, USA, 2016.
[6] KEPRI. 『Test Bed for 2.5GW Offshore Wind Farm at
Yellow Sea』 Interim Design Report(in Korea), 2014.
[7] Germanischer Lloyd. Guideline for the Certification of
Offshore Wind Turbines. Hamburg, Germany, 2005.
[8] B. M. Sumer, J. Fredsøe, The Mechanics of Scour in the
Marine Environment. World Scientific Publishing Co.
Pte. Ltd. 2002.
[9] S. J. Ahn, U. Y. Kim, J. K. Lee. “Experimental Study
for Scour Protection around Bridge Pier by Falling-Flow
Interruption”, Journal of KSCE, vol. 19, no. II-1, pp.
57-65, 1999.
[10] V. Yakhot, S. A. Orszag, S. Thangam, T. B. Gatski, C.
G. Speziale, “Development of turbulence models for
shear flows by a double expansion technique”, Physics
of Fluids, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1510-1520, 1992.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858424

PDF View
Flow on the inclined drop with bat-shaped elements: (a) Non-submerged flow

Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering

Rasoul Daneshfaraz*, Ehsan Aminvash**, Silvia Di Francesco***, Amir Najibi**, John Abraham****

토목공학의 수치해석법

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to provide a method to increase energy dissipation on an inclined drop. Therefore, three types of rough elements with cylindrical, triangular and batshaped geometries are used on the inclined slope in the relative critical depth range of 0.128 to 0.36 and the effect of the geometry of these elements is examined using Flow 3D software. The results showed demonstrate that the downstream relative depth obtained from the numerical analysis is in good agreement with the laboratory results. The application of rough elements on the inclined drop increased the downstream relative depth and also the relative energy dissipation. The application of rough elements on the sloping surface of the drop significantly reduced the downstream Froude number, so that the Froude number in all models ranging from 4.7~7.5 to 1.45~3.36 also decreased compared to the plain drop. Bat-shaped elements are structurally smaller in size, so the use of these elements, in addition to dissipating more energy, is also economically viable.

이 연구의 주요 목적은 경사진 낙하에서 에너지 소산을 증가시키는 방법을 제공하는 것입니다. 따라서 0.128 ~ 0.36의 상대 임계 깊이 범위에서 경사면에 원통형, 삼각형 및 박쥐 모양의 형상을 가진 세 가지 유형의 거친 요소가 사용되며 이러한 요소의 형상의 영향은 Flow 3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 조사됩니다. 결과는 수치 분석에서 얻은 하류 상대 깊이가 실험실 결과와 잘 일치함을 보여줍니다. 경 사진 낙하에 거친 요소를 적용하면 하류 상대 깊이와 상대 에너지 소산이 증가했습니다. 낙차 경사면에 거친 요소를 적용하면 하류의 Froude 수를 크게 감소시켜 4.7~7.5에서 1.45~3.36 범위의 모든 모델에서 Froude 수도 일반 낙차에 비해 감소했습니다. 박쥐 모양의 요소는 구조적으로 크기가 더 작기 때문에 더 많은 에너지를 분산시키는 것 외에도 이러한 요소를 사용하는 것이 경제적으로도 가능합니다.

Keywords: Downstream depth, Energy dissipation, Froude number, Inclined drop, Roughness elements

Introduction

급수 네트워크 시스템, 침식 수로, 수처리 시스템 및 경사가 큰 경우 흐름 에너지를 더 잘 제어하기 위해 경사 방울을 사용할 수 있습니다. 낙하 구조는 지반의 자연 경사를 설계 경사로 변환하여 에너지 소산, 유속 감소 및 수심 증가를 유발합니다. 따라서 흐름의 하류 에너지를 분산 시키기 위해 에너지 분산 구조를 사용할 수 있습니다. 난기류와 혼합된 물과 공기의 형성은 에너지 소비를 증가 시키는 효과적인 방법입니다. 흐름 경로에서 거칠기 요소를 사용하는 것은 에너지 소산을 위한 알려진 방법입니다. 이러한 요소는 흐름 경로에 배치됩니다. 그들은 종종 에너지 소산을 증가시키기 위해 다른 기하학적 구조와 배열을 가지고 있습니다. 이 연구의 목적은 직사각형 경사 방울에 대한 거칠기 요소의 영향을 조사하는 것입니다.

Fig. 1: Model made in Ardabil, Iran
Fig. 1: Model made in Ardabil, Iran
Fig. 2: Geometric and hydraulic parameters of an inclined drop equipped with roughness elements
Fig. 2: Geometric and hydraulic parameters of an inclined drop equipped with roughness elements
Fig. 3: Views of the incline with (a) Bat-shaped, (b) Cylindrical, (c) Triangular roughness elements
Fig. 3: Views of the incline with (a) Bat-shaped, (b) Cylindrical, (c) Triangular roughness elements
Fig. 4: Geometric profile of inclined drop and boundary conditions with the bat-shape roughness element
Fig. 4: Geometric profile of inclined drop and boundary conditions with the bat-shape roughness element
Fig. 5: Variation of the RMSE varying cell size
Fig. 5: Variation of the RMSE varying cell size
Fig. 6: Numerical and laboratory comparison of the downstream relative depth
Fig. 6: Numerical and laboratory comparison of the downstream relative depth
Fig. 7: Flow profile on inclined drop in discharge of 5 L/s: (a) Without roughness elements; (b) Bat-shaped roughness element; (c) Cylindrical roughness element; (d) Triangular roughness element
Fig. 7: Flow profile on inclined drop in discharge of 5 L/s: (a) Without roughness elements; (b) Bat-shaped roughness element; (c) Cylindrical roughness element; (d) Triangular roughness element
Fig. 8: Relative edge depth versus the relative critical depth
Fig. 8: Relative edge depth versus the relative critical depth
Flow on the inclined drop with bat-shaped elements: (a) Non-submerged flow
Flow on the inclined drop with bat-shaped elements: (a) Non-submerged flow
Fig. 9: Flow on the inclined drop with bat-shaped elements: (b) Submerged flow
Fig. 9: Flow on the inclined drop with bat-shaped elements: (b) Submerged flow
Fig. 10: Relative downstream depth versus the relative critical depth
Fig. 10: Relative downstream depth versus the relative critical depth
Fig. 11: Relative downstream depth versus the relative critical depth
Fig. 11: Relative downstream depth versus the relative critical depth

Conclusions

현재 연구에서 FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 한 높이, 한 각도, 밀도 15% 및 지그재그 배열에서 삼각형, 원통형 및 박쥐 모양의 형상을 가진 세 가지 유형의 거칠기 요소를 사용하여 경사 낙하 수리학적 매개변수에 대한 거칠기 요소 형상의 영향 평가되었다. VOF 방법을 사용하여 자유 표면 흐름을 시뮬레이션하고 초기에 3개의 난류 모델 RNG, k-ɛ 및 kω를 검증에 사용하고 이를 검토한 후 RNG 방법을 사용하여 다른 모델을 시뮬레이션했습니다. 1- 수치 결과에서 얻은 부드러운 경사 방울의 하류 상대 깊이는 실험실 데이터와 매우 좋은 상관 관계가 있으며 원통형 요소가 장착 된 경사 방울의 상대 에지 깊이 값이 가장 높았습니다. 2- 하류 상대깊이는 임계상대깊이가 증가함에 따라 상승하는 경향을 나타내어 박쥐형 요소를 구비한 경사낙하와 완만한 경사낙하가 각각 하류상대깊이가 가장 높고 가장 낮았다. 3- 하류 깊이의 증가로 인해 상대적 임계 깊이가 증가함에 따라 상대적 에너지 소산이 감소합니다. 한편, 가장 높은 에너지 소산은 박쥐 모양의 요소가 장착된 경사 낙하와 관련이 있으며 가장 낮은 에너지 소산은 부드러운 낙하와 관련이 있습니다. 삼각형, 원통형 및 박쥐 모양의 거친 요소가 장착된 드롭은 부드러운 드롭보다 각각 65%, 76% 및 85% 더 많은 흐름 에너지를 소산합니다. 4- 낙차의 경사면에 거친 요소를 적용하여 다운 스트림 Froude 수를 크게 줄여 4.7 ~ 7.5에서 1.45 ~ 3.36까지의 모든 모델에서 Froude 수가 부드러운 낙하에 비해 감소했습니다. 또한, 다른 원소보다 부피가 작은 박쥐 모양의 거칠기의 부피로 인해 이러한 유형의 거칠기를 사용하는 것이 경제적입니다.

References

References:
[1] Abbaspour, A., Shiravani, P., and Hosseinzadeh dalir, A.,
“Experimental study of the energy dissipation on the rough ramps”,
ISH journal of hydraulic engineering, 2019, p. 1-9.
[2] Abraham, J.P., Sparrow, E.M., Gorman, J.M., Zhao, Y., and
Minkowycz, W.J., “Application of an Intermittency model for
laminar, transitional, and turbulent internal flows”, Journal of
Fluids Engineering, vol. 141, 2019, paper no. 071204.
[3] Ahmad, Z., Petappa, N.M., and Westrich, B., “Energy
dissipation on block ramps with staggered boulders”, Journal of
hydraulic engineering, vol. 135(6), 2009, p. 522-526.
[4] Babaali, H.R., Shamsai, A., and Vosoughifar, H.R.,
“Computational modeling of the hydraulic jump in the stilling
basin with convergence walls using CFD codes”, Arabian Journal
for Science and Engineering, vol. 40(2), 2014, p. 381-395.
[5] Castillo, L.G., Carrillo, J.M., and Cacía, J.T., “Numerical
simulations and laboratory measurements in hydraulic jumps”,
International conference on hydroinformatics. (2014, August) New
York city.
[6] Daneshfaraz, R., Aminvash, E., Esmaeli, R., Sadeghfam, S.,
and Abraham, J., “Experimental and numerical investigation for
energy dissipation of supercritical flow in sudden contractions”,
Journal of groundwater science and engineering, vol. 8(4), 2020a,
p. 396-406.
[7] Daneshfaraz, R., Aminvash, E., Ghaderi, A., Kuriqi, A., and
Abraham, J., “Three-dimensional investigation of hydraulic
properties of vertical drop in the presence of step and grid
dissipators”, Symmetry, vol. 13 (5), 2021a, p. 895.
[8] Daneshfaraz, R., Aminvash, E., Ghaderi, A., Abraham, J., and
Bagherzadeh, M., “SVM performance for predicting the effect of
horizontal screen diameters on the hydraulic parameters of a
vertical drop”, Applied sciences, vol. 11 (9), 2021b, p. 4238.
[9] Daneshfaraz, R., Bagherzadeh, M., Esmaeeli, R., Norouzi, R.,
and Abraham, J. “Study of the performance of support vector
machine for predicting vertical drop hydraulic parameters in the
presence of dual horizontal screens”, Water supply, vol 21(1),
2021c, p. 217-231.
[10] Daneshfaraz, R., and Ghaderi, A., “Numerical investigation of
inverse curvature ogee spillways”, Civil engineering journal, vol.
3(11), 2017, p. 1146-1156.
[11] Daneshfaraz, R., Majedi Asl, M., and Bagherzadeh, M.,
“Experimental Investigation of the Energy Dissipation and the
Downstream Relative Depth of Pool in the Sloped Gabion Drop
and the Sloped simple Drop”, AUT Journal of Civil Engineering,
2020b (In persian).
[12] Daneshfaraz, R., Majedi Asl, M., Bazyar, A., Abraham, J.,
Norouzi, R., “The laboratory study of energy dissipation in inclined
drops equipped with a screen”, Journal of Applied Water
Engineering and Research, 2020c, p. 1-10.
[13] Daneshfaraz, R., Minaei, O., Abraham, J., Dadashi, S., and
Ghaderi, A., “3-D Numerical simulation of water flow over a
broad-crested weir with openings”, ISH Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering, 2019, p.1-9.
[14] Daneshfaraz, R., Sadeghfam, S., and Kashani, M., “Numerical
simulation of flow over stepped spillways”, Research in civil
engineering and environmental engineering, vol. 2(4), 2014, p.
190-198.
[15] Ghaderi, A., Abbasi, S., Abraham, J., and Azamathulla, H.M.,
“Efficiency of trapezoidal labyrinth shaped stepped spillways”,
Flow measurement and instrumentation, vol. 72, 2020a.
[16] Ghaderi, A., Daneshfaraz, R., Dasineh, M., and Di Francesco,
S., “Energy dissipation and hydraulics of flow over trapezoidaltriangular labyrinth weirs”, Water, vol. 12(7), 2020b, p. 1-18.
[17] Ghaderi, A., Daneshfaraz, R., Torabi, M., Abraham, and
Azamathulla, H.M. “Experimental investigation on effective
scouring parameters downstream from stepped spillways”, Water
supply, vol. 20(4), 2020c, p. 1-11.
[18] Ghare, A.D., Ingle, R.N., Porey, P.D., and Gokhale, S.S.
“Block ramp design for efficient energy dissipation”, Journal of
energy dissipation, vol. 136(1), 2010, p. 1-5.
[19] Gorman, J.M., Sparrow, E.M., Smith, C.J., Ghoash, A.,
Abraham, J.P., Daneshfaraz, R., Rezezadeh, J., “In-bend pressure
drop and post-bend heat transfer for a bend with partial blockage at
its inlet”, Numerical Heat Transfer A, vol, 73, 2018, p. 743-767.
[20] Jamil, M., and Khan, S.A., “Theorical study of hydraulic jump
in circular channel section”, ISH journal of hydraulic engineering,
vol. 16(1), 2010, p. 1-10.
[21] Katourani, S., and Kashefipour, S.M., “Effect of the geometric
characteristics of baffle on hydraulic flow condition in baffled
apron drop”, Irrigation sciences and engineering, vol. 37(2), 2012,
p. 51-59.
[22] Lai, Y.G., and Wu, K.A., “Three-dimensional flow and
sediment transport model for free surface open channel flow on
unstructured flexible meshes”, Fluids, vol. 4(1), 2019, p. 1-19.

[23] Nayebzadeh, B., Lotfollahi yaghin, M.A., and Daneshfaraz,
R., “Numerical investigation of hydraulic characteristics of vertical
drops with screens and gradually wall expanding”, Amirkabir
journal of civil engineering, 2020 (In Persian).
[24] Nurouzi, R., Daneshfaraz, R., and Bazyar, A., “The study of
energy dissipation due to the use of vertical screen in the
downstream of inclined drop by adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy inference
system (ANFIS)”, AUT journal of civil engineering, 2019, (In
Persian).
[25] Ohtsu, I., and Yasuda, Y., “Hydraulic jump in sloping
channel”, Journal of hydraulic engineering, vol. 117(7), 1991, p.
905-921.
[26] Olsen, L., Abraham, J.P., Cheng, L.K., Gorman, J.M., and
Sparrow, E.M., “Summary of forced-convection fluid flow and
heat transfer for square cylinders of different aspect ratios ranging
from the cube to a two-dimensional cylinder”, Advances in Heat
Transfer, Vol. 51, 2019, p. 351-457.
[27] Pagliara, S., Das, R., and Palermo, M., “Energy dissipation on
submerged block ramps”, Journal of irrigation and drainage
engineering, vol. 134(4), 2008, p.527-532.
[28] Pagliara, S., and Palermo, M., “Effect of stilling basin
geometry on the dissipative process in the presence of block
ramps”, Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, vol.
138(11), 2012, p. 1027-1031.
[29] Simsek, O., Akoz, M.S, and Soydan, N.G., “Numerical
validation of open channel flow over a curvilinear broad-creasted
weir”, Progress in computational fluid dynamics an international
journal, vol. 16(6), 2016, p. 364-378.
[30] Sharif, N., and Rostami, A., “Experimental and numerical
study of the effect of flow sepration on dissipating energy in
compound bucket”, APCBEE procedia, vol. 9, 2014, p. 334-338.
[31] Sparrow, E.M., Tong, J.C.K., and Abraham, J.P., “Fluid flow
in a system with separate laminar and turbulent zones”, Numerical
Heat Transfer A, vol. 53(4), 2008, p. 341-353.
[32] Sparrow, E.M., Gorman, J.M., Abraham, J.P., and
Minkowycz, W.J., “Validation of turbulence models for numerical
simulation of fluid flow and convective heat transfers”, Advances
in Heat Transfer, vol. 49, 2017, p. 397-421.
[33] Wagner, W.E., “Hydraulic model studies of the check intake
structure-potholes East canal”, Bureau of reclamation hydraulic
laboratory report hyd, 1956, 411.

PDF View
Numerical simulation of energy dissipation in crescent-shaped contraction of the flow path

Numerical simulation of energy dissipation in crescent-shaped contraction of the flow path

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Iran.
2 M.sc student, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Iran.
3 M.sc student, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Iran

Abstract

One of the methods of controlling and reducing flow energy is the use of energy dissipating structures and the formation of hydraulic jumps. One of these types of structures is the constriction elements in the flow path, which leads to a decrease in the energy of the passing flow. In the present study, the effect of crescent-shaped contraction as an energy dissipating structure in the supercritical flow path has been investigated using FLOW-3D software. Examining the simulation results, the RNG turbulence model due to its higher accuracy and lower relative error and absolute error percentage than other models, among the RNG turbulence models, k-ε, k-ω and LES was selected. In this study, the amplitude of the Froude number after the gate as the most effective dimensionless parameter in energy dissipation varied from 2.8 to 7.5 and the values of stenosis on both sides are 5 and 7.5 cm. The results show that in all cases of using the crescent-shaped contractions, the energy consumption due to the contraction is 5 and 7.5 cm, respectively, based on the energy drop relative to the upstream of 24.62% and 29.84% and compared to the downstream 46.14% and 48.42% more than the classic free jump. Also, by examining the obtained results, it was observed that the crescent-shaped contractions have a better performance in terms of energy loss compared to the sudden contraction, obtained from the studies of previous researchers. Based on the simulation results, with increasing the upstream Froude number, the relative energy dissipation to the upstream and downstream crescent-shaped contraction increased so that the use of contraction elements reduces the downstream Froude number of the contracted section in the range of 1.6 to 3/2.

흐름 에너지를 제어하고 줄이는 방법 중 하나는 에너지 소산 구조를 사용하고 유압 점프를 형성하는 것입니다. 이러한 유형의 구조 중 하나는 흐름 경로의 수축 요소로, 통과하는 흐름의 에너지를 감소시킵니다. 현재 연구에서는 초 임계 유동 경로에서 에너지 소산 구조로서 초승달 모양의 수축 효과가 FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 조사되었습니다. 시뮬레이션 결과를 살펴보면 RNG 난류 모델 중 k-ε, k-ω, LES 중에서 다른 모델보다 정확도가 높고 상대 오차와 절대 오차 비율이 낮은 RNG 난류 모델을 선택했습니다. 이 연구에서 에너지 소산에서 가장 효과적인 무 차원 매개 변수 인 게이트 뒤의 Froude 수의 진폭은 2.8에서 7.5까지 다양했으며 양쪽의 협착 값은 5cm와 7.5cm입니다. 결과는 초승달 모양의 수축을 사용하는 모든 경우에서 수축으로 인한 에너지 소비는 각각 5cm와 7.5cm로 상류에 비해 에너지 강하가 24.62 % 및 29.84 %이고 하류와 비교됩니다. 고전적인 자유 점프보다 46.14 % 및 48.42 % 더 많습니다. 또한 얻어진 결과를 살펴보면 초승달 모양의 수축이 이전 연구자들의 연구에서 얻은 갑작스런 수축에 비해 에너지 손실 측면에서 더 나은 성능을 보이는 것으로 나타났습니다. 시뮬레이션 결과에 따르면 상류 Froude 수를 증가 시키면 상류 및 하류 초승달 모양의 수축에 대한 상대적 에너지 소산이 증가하여 수축 요소를 사용하면 수축 된 부분의 하류 Froude 수가 1.6 ~ 3/2 범위에서 감소합니다. .

Keywords

Figure 3. Flow velocity on seawall in A2-3 modeling.

Modeling of the Changes in Flow Velocity on Seawalls under Different Conditions Using FLOW-3D Software

Open Journal of Marine Science
Vol.06 No.02(2016), Article ID:65874,6 pages
10.4236/ojms.2016.62026

FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 다양한 조건에서 Seawalls의 흐름 속도 변경 모델링

Maryam Deilami-Tarifi1, Mehdi Behdarvandi-Askar2*, Vahid Chegini3, Sadegh Haghighi-Pour4
1Department of Coastal Engineering, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr, Iran

2Department of Marine Structures, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr, Iran
3Iran National Center for Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Department of Civil Engineering, Excellence in Education Center of Jihad University of Khuzestan, Ahvaz, Iran
Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

ABSTRACT

방파벽은 파도힘의 수준을 감소시키고 다른 구조물로부터 보호하기 위해 건설되는 보호 구조물 중 하나입니다. 이와 관련하여 이러한 구조에 대한 보다 정확한 조사는 다른 관점에서 매우 중요합니다. 이 연구는 다른 레이아웃과 경사면에서 장애물을 고려하여 방파제 크라운의 속도 변화를 조사합니다. FLOW-3D는 모델링을 위한 이 연구에서 사용되었습니다. 모델링의 결과는 장애물의 존재가 방파벽의 크라운의 유량을 줄이는 결정적인 역할을 한다는 것을 보여줍니다. 또한, 예상대로, 상류 방파의 경사계는 벽의 가장 낮은 속도가 D-상태 레이아웃과 45°의 경사에서 발생하므로 이 속도를 줄이는 데 매우 결정적입니다.

Keywords: 플로우 속도, 방파제 크라운, 모델링, Flow Velocity, Seawall Crown, Modeling, FLOW-3D

1. 소개

방파벽은 파도의 속도를 감소시키고 다른 구조물을 보호하기 위해 건설되는 보호 구조물 중 하나입니다. 등대는 일반적으로 방파벽에 의해 보호되는 구조 중 하나입니다. 따라서, 방파성상에 통과하는 물의 부피의 중요성 외에도, 이 구조물에 대한 크라운의 통과-흐름의 속도는 이러한 벽 뒤에 있는 구조물에 추진력과 충동을 만드는 속도 요인의 중요성 때문에 매우 중요하다. 기본적으로 업스트림 경사면에서 장애물을 생성하고 업스트림 경사의 속도는 이 속도의 양을 줄이는 데 매우 효과적일 수 있습니다. 그러나 특정 경사면에서 최적의 장애물 레이아웃에 도달하기 위해 모델링하여 이 문제를 정확하게 조사해야 합니다. 본 연구에서는, FLOW-3D의 3차원 모델이 언급된 문제점을 조사하는 데 사용된다 [1].

2. 연구 역사

여러 연구는 파도가 해양 구조물을 덮어 넘나는 데 초점을 맞추고 있습니다. 이러한 방법은 지속적으로 바다 파도로부터 해안을 보호하기 위해 구조물의 오버 토핑을 정확하게 예측했다. 2002년까지 거의 6,500건의 시험이 실시되었습니다. 일반 파도의 물리적 모델도 미국에서 수행되었습니다 [2] . 무작위 파도의 가장 완벽한 세트는 오웬에 의해 완료되었다 (1980). 오웬은 오버 토핑과 바다 벽의 높이와 오버 토핑의 정도 사이의 관계를 연구하기 위해 물리적 모델 테스트의 번호를 수행 [3] . 그는 오버 토핑의 정도는 파도 높이 및 파도 기간과 같은 환경 조건뿐만 아니라 구조 재료의 기하학 및 유형에 따라 달라지며 있음을 보여주었습니다. 이러한 요인의 조합을 조사해야 합니다. 폰 마이어와 듀발 (1992) 연구의 또 다른 시리즈를 수행 [4] .

3. 재료 및 방법

이 연구에서는 68개의 다양한 형상이 모델링용 소프트웨어에 제공되며 다음 표 1에간단히 소개됩니다. 이 68 개의 다른 기하학에는 4 개의 다른 슬로프, 4 개의 다른 레이아웃 및 4 개의 다른 장애물 높이및 장애물이없는 4 개의 상태및 다른 경사에서만 포함 [5] . 그런 다음, 이러한 서로 다른 형상 및 상태는 FLOW-3D 3차원 모델을 사용하여 동일한 조건에서 평가 및 분석됩니다.

표 1. 변수지정.

4. 숫자 모델

FLOW-3D 소프트웨어는 3차원 유동 필드 분석을 통해 유체 역학 분야에서 강력한 유압 시뮬레이터 응용 프로그램입니다. 모델에서 지배하는 방정식은 다른 유사한 모델과 마찬가지로 Navier-Stokes 방정식과 질량 방정식의 보존[6]입니다.

이 응용 프로그램의 채널을 모델링하려면 일반 조건(모든 시스템의 시뮬레이션 포함), 물리적 조건, 형상 및 모델 해결 네트워크, 출력 및 관련 옵션을 조정해야 합니다. 온도도는 시스템 단위, SI 및 온도에 대해 선택되었습니다.

물리적 인 측면에서, 소프트웨어는 현상을 지배하는 물리학의 원칙에 따라 관련 조건을 선택할 수 있습니다. 이 연구를 지배하는 물리적 조건은 중력과 점도와 난기류입니다. 이 소프트웨어의 난기류는 5 가지 모델에 의해 자극되고이 연구에 사용되는 모델은 재정상화 그룹 (RNG)이었습니다. 난기류의 이 모델에서, K-모델에서 실험적으로 계산된 상수값은 암시적으로 파생된다[7].

그 후 유체를 정의해야 합니다. 이 연구의 선택된 유체는 섭씨 20도물[ 8]이다.

다음 단계는 형상을 정의하고 시뮬레이션에서 중요한 네트워크를 해결하는 것입니다 [9]. FLOW3D를 사용하면 소프트웨어에서 사용할 수 있는 도구로 많은 유체 현상을 묘사할 수 있습니다. 채널 형상을 정의하면 네트워크를 해결해야 합니다. 소프트웨어의 정의된 해결 네트워크는 네트워크 크기, 셀 수 및 X, Y 및 Z 및 경계 조건의 세 가지 좌표에서 해당 치수를 포함한 일반(입방) 해결 네트워크의 형태입니다. 네트워크 셀 치수의 크기가 작을수록 시뮬레이션을 위한 프로그램의 기능과 정밀도가 높을수록[10]이됩니다.

5. 결과

다른 그림에서 관찰할 수 있으므로 다이어그램은 두 가지 유형으로, 먼저 그림 1-4를 포함하는 소프트웨어의 직접 출력과 다른 숫자 5-7을 변경 프로세스의 다이어그램으로 포함합니다. 그러나 그림 1-4에서는 경사면 중 하나에서 출력이 소프트웨어 출력에서 직접 가져온다는 점을 언급해야 합니다.

언급된 수치와 관련하여, 이러한 속도는 장애물없이 상태의 상류 경사면에서 최대인 반면 방파제의 상류 경사면에서 가장 높은 속도 비율이 발생한다는 것을 이해할 수 있다. 흥미로운 점은 가장 낮은 속도는 일반적으로 방파제 크라운에 존재한다는 것입니다.

그림 5-8에서 볼 수 있듯이, 상류 방파제의 모든 다른 경사 상태에서, 가장 높은 유량 속도는 10cm 높이와 가장 낮은 속도의 장애물과 관련이 있으며 50cm 높이의 장애물과 관련이 있다. 그 이유는 장애물과의 충돌로 인해 잠재적 에너지로 변환되는 유동 운동 에너지의 가치가 장애물의 높이를 증가시켜 증가하기 때문입니다. 따라서, 높이가

그림 1. A1 모델링의 방파제의 흐름 속도.

그림 2. A2-1 모델링의 방파제의 흐름 속도.

Figure 3. Flow velocity on seawall in A2-3 modeling.

그림 4. A3-1 모델링의 방파제의 흐름 속도.

그림 5. 방파제 유형 A(61° 경사)의 흐름 속도 의 변화.

그림 6. 방파제 형 B (56 ° 경사)의 흐름 속도의 변화.

그림 7. 방파제 유형 C(51° 경사)의 흐름 속도 의 변화.

그림 8. 방파제 유형 D(45° 경사)의 흐름 속도 변경입니다.

해당 유동 운동 에너지는 각 장애물에 대한 흐름의 충돌에서 잠재적 에너지의 해당 높이로 변환되며, 흐름 속도가 잠시 0이 되고 장애물을 건너면 속도가 증가한다. 장애물의 높이가 낮은 것이든, 순간적인 제로 속도 상태가 줄어들고 흐름은 더 높은 속도와 함께 계속 움직입니다.

6. 결론

Also, as it can be observed, the highest difference of velocity in all the figures is between the obstacles with 10
cm height and the obstacles with 50 cm height. Also, this amount of difference in velocity for difference between the obstacles with 10 cm and 20 cm heights is higher than that of the differences in the obstacles with 20
cm and 30 cm heights which can be related to the special conditions in flow hydraulic in that range of height.

또한, 관찰할 수 있으므로 모든 수치에서 속도의 가장 높은 차이는 높이 가 10cm의 장애물과 높이가 50cm인 장애물 사이에 있습니다. 또한, 10cm와 20cm 높이의 장애물 사이의 차이에 대한 속도차이는 20cm 및 30cm 높이의 장애물의 차이보다 높으며, 이는 그 높이 범위에서 유압의 특별한 조건과 관련이 있을 수 있다.

이 논문 인용

메리암 데일라미-타리피, 메디 베다르반디-아스카르, 바히드 체기니, 사데 그 하그하이-부어(2016) FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 다양한 조건하에서 해벽에 흐르는 속도의 변화를 모델링한다. 해양 과학의 오픈 저널,06,317-322. doi: 10.4236/ojms.2016.62026

참조

  1. 1. Owen, M.W. (1980) Design of Seawalls Allowing for Wave Overtopping. Rep. EX924, Hydraulics Research Wallingford, England.   [Citation Time(s):1]
  2. 2. van der Meer, J.W. and Janssen, J.P.F.M. (1995) Wave Run-Up and Wave Overtopping at Dikes. In: Kobayashi, N. and Demirbilek, Z., Eds., Wave Forces on Inclined and Vertical Wall Structures, ASCE, New York.   [Citation Time(s):1]
  3. 3. CIRIA/CUR (1995) Manual on the Use of Rock in Hydraulic Engineering. CUR/RWS Report 169, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.   [Citation Time(s):1]
  4. 4. Pullen, T., Allsop, N.W.H., Bruce, T., Kortenhaus, A., Schuttrumpf, H. and van der Meer, J.W. (2007) EurOtop— Wave Overtopping of Seadefences and Related Structures Assessment Manual.
    http://www.overtopping-manual.com/manual.html?   [Citation Time(s):1]
  5. 5. De Wall, J.P. and Van der Meer, J.W. (1992) Wave Run-Up and Overtopping at Coastal Structures. ASCE, Proceeding of 23rd ICCE, Venice, 1758-1771.   [Citation Time(s):1]
  6. 6. De Gerloni, M., Franco, L. and Passoni, G. (1991) The Safety of Breakwaters against Wave Overtopping. Proceedings of ICE Conference on Breakwaters and Coastal Structures, Thomas Telford, London.   [Citation Time(s):1]
  7. 7. Fenton, J.D. (1988) The Numerical Solution of Steady Water Wave Problems. Computers & Geosciences, 14.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(88)90066-0   [Citation Time(s):1]
  8. 8. Owen, M.W. (1982) Design of Seawalls Allowing for Wave Overtopping. Rep. EX924, Hydraulics Research Wallingford, England.   [Citation Time(s):1]
  9. 9. Allsop, W., Bruce, T., Pearson, J. and Besley, P. (2006) Wave Overtopping at Vertical and Steep Seawall.   [Citation Time(s):1]
  10. 10. TAW (1974) Technical Advisory Committee on Protection against Inundation, Wave Run-Up and Overtopping. Government Publishing Office, The Hague.   [Citation Time(s):1]
Full Text PDF View
Figure 5 - Modeling a simple lotus overflow symmetrically in FLOW-3D software

Flow-3D를 이용한 나팔형 여수로의 방류계수에 대한 와류방지 블레이드 45 도의 효과

Effect of Vortex Breaker Blades 45 Degree on Discharge Coefficient of Morning Glory Spillway Using Flow-3D

Authors

S. Noruzi1
and J. Ahadiyan2*
1– M.Sc. Student, Faculty of Water Sciences Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.
2*-Corresponding Author, Associate Professor, Faculty of Water Sciences Engineering, Shahid Chamran
University of Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

The discharge coefficient of morning glory spillway is decreased with eddies created by vortex at the inlet part of weir. However, a series of specific blades can reduce vortices which result in the spillway efficiency is increased. Hence, in this research numerical modeling of installed breaker blade on morning glory spillway was evaluated using Flow-3D model. To achieve these purposes, morning glory spillway was modeled without and with blades 3, 4 and 6 blades at 45 degree angle. To simulate the turbulence fluctuations, the modified k-e model (RNG k-e) was used and its results were compared to the experimental data. Results showed that by installing blades, the discharge coefficient increases up to 42 percent with 25 percent decreasing in the upstream water level. Moreover, among the three different arrangements of blades, the six-blade model was found to have more satisfactory results than other models. In comparison to control model, for H/D between 0 to 0.1 and 0.1 to 0.2 the discharge coefficient has been increased 40 and 57 percent for six-blade arrangement, respectively. 

모닝 글로리의 방류계수는 위어 입구 부분의 와류에 의해 생성된 소용돌이로 감소합니다. 그러나 일련의 특정 블레이드는 와류를 줄여 여수로 효율성을 높일 수 있습니다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 모닝 글로리 여수로에 설치된 브레이커 블레이드의 수치 모델링을 FLOW-3D 모델을 사용하여 평가했습니다. 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위해 모닝 글로리 여수로는 45도 각도로 블레이드 3, 4 및 6 블레이드 있는 모델과 없는 모델로 모델링되었습니다. 난류 변동을 시뮬레이션하기 위해 수정된 k-e 모델 (RNG k-e)을 사용하고 그 결과를 실험 데이터와 비교했습니다. 결과에 따르면 블레이드를 설치하면 상류 수위가 25 % 감소하면서 배출 계수가 42 %까지 증가합니다. 또한 3 개의 서로다른 블레이드 배열 중 6 개 블레이드 모델이 다른 모델보다 더 만족스러운 결과를 나타냈다. 기본 모델과 비교하여 H / D가 0 ~ 0.1 및 0.1 ~ 0.2 인 경우, 6개 블레이드 배열에서 방류계수가 각각 40 % 및 57 % 증가했습니다.

Keywords

Figure 1 - Dimensions of the vortex blade
Figure 1 – Dimensions of the vortex blade
Figure 3 - A (Physical model of lotus overflow without blade, b) Physical model of lotus overflow with eddy blades.
Figure 3 – A (Physical model of lotus overflow without blade, b) Physical model of lotus overflow with eddy blades.
Figure 5 - Modeling a simple lotus overflow symmetrically in FLOW-3D software
Figure 5 – Modeling a simple lotus overflow symmetrically in FLOW-3D software
Figure 7 - Comparison of Ashley flow chart with numerical model and laboratory
Figure 7 – Comparison of Ashley flow chart with numerical model and laboratory
Figure 8 - Comparison of flow coefficient diagram - immersion ratio of numerical model with laboratory: a (overflow without blade, b) overflow with three blades, c (overflow with four blades, d) overflow with six blades
Figure 8 – Comparison of flow coefficient diagram – immersion ratio of numerical model with laboratory: a (overflow without blade, b) overflow with three blades, c (overflow with four blades, d) overflow with six blades

Reference

1 -حیدری ارجلو، س.، موسوی جهرمی، س. ح. و ادیب، ا. 1386 .بررسی تاثیر شیب بر تعداد بهینه پلکانها در سرریزهای پلکانی، مجله علوم و مهندسی
.)123-136 :)2(33 ،كشاورزی علمی )آبیاری
2 -حاجیپور، گ. 1363 .بررسی آزمایشگاهی تأثیر تیغههای گردابشکن بر هیدرولیک جریان سرریز نیلوفری. پایاننامه كارشناسی ارشد رشته سازههای آبی،
دانشکده مهندسی علوم آب، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
3 -رنجبر ملکشاه، م.، 1363 .بررسی رفتار سرریز نیلوفری با پایین دست تاج پلکانی بوسیله مدلسازی رایانهای، پایاننامه كارشناسی ارشد مهندسی عمران،
دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه خواجه نصیر طوسی.
4 -رمضانی، س. كاویانپور، م ر. و ع. حسنی نژاد. 1362 .بررسی پارامترهای مؤثر بر آبگذری سرریزهای نیلوفری. هفتمین كنگره ملی مهندسی عمران،
دانشکده مهندسی شهید نیکبخت، زاهدان.
1 -سامانی، م. 1331 .طراحی سازههای هیدرولیکی. انتشارات شركت مهندسی مشاور دز آب اهواز
1 -قاسمزاده، ف. 1362 .شبیه سازی مسائل هیدرولیکی در 3D-FLOW .تهران، نوآور.
3 -كمانبدست، 1 ،.موسوی، س.ر. 1361 .مطالعه آزمایشگاهی تأثیر تعداد و زاویه گرداب شکن بر مشخصات جریان در سرریز نیلوفری مربعی، نشریه علوم
آب و خاک )غعلوم و فنون كشاورزی و منابع طبیعی(، سال بیستم، شماره 38 ،صفحه 182-131 .
8 -نظری پوركیانی، ع ا. 1363 .بررسی فشار و سرعت جریان در سرریز نیلوفری سد البرز با استفاده از نرمافزار 3D-FLOW .اولین كنفرانس سراسری
توسعه محوری مهندسی عمران، معماری، برق و مکانیک ایران.
6 -نوحانی، ا.، جمالی امام قیس، ر. 1364 .بررسی آزمایشگاهی تأثیرشکل تیغه های ضد گرداب برراندمان تخلیهی سرریزهای نیلوفری، نشریه آبیاری و
زهکشی ایران، جلد 6 ،شماره 1 ،صفحه 346-341 .
10-Akbari, A A., Nohani, E and A. Afrous. 2015. Numerical study of the effect of anti-vortex plates on the
inflow pattern in shaft spillways. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 5(S1):
3819-3826.
11-Anonymous, 1965. Design of Small Dams. Water Resources Technical publication, U.S Department of
the interior Bureau of Reclamation.
12-Bagheri, A., Shafai Bajestan, M., Mousavi Jahromi, H., Kashkuli, H. and H. Sedghi. 2010. Hydraulic
evaluation of the flow over polyhedral morning glory spillways. Word Applied Sciences Journal, 9(7):
712-717.
13- Fattor, C. A. and J. D. Bacchiega. 2003. Analysis of instabilities in the charge of regime in morning
glory spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 40(4): 114-123.
14- Khatsuria, R. M. 2005. Hydraulics of spillways and energy dissipaters. Marcel Dekker. Department of
Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia, Institute of Technology Atlanta, Newyork, USA.
15-Mousavi. S. R., Kamanbedast, A.A., and H. Fathian. 2013. Experimental investigation of the effect of
number of anti-vortex piers on submergence threshold in morning glory spillway with square inlet.
Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(24): 3534-3540.
16- Novak, P. 2007. Hydraulic Structures, Fourth edition published by Taylor and Francis. University of
New Castle upon, Tyne, UK, Landon and Network.
17-Tavana, M H., Mousavi Jahromi, H., Shafai Bajestan, M., Masjedi, A. R. and H. Sedghi. 2011.
Optimization of number and direction of vortex breakers in the morning glory spillway using physical
model. Economy, Environmental and Conservation Journal, 17(2): 435-440.
18-Vresteeg. H. K and W. Malalasekera. 1995. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics. Longman
Scientific and Technical. New York.
19-Yakhot. V and L. M. Smith. 1992. The renormalization group. The e-expansion and of turbulence
models. Journal of Computing, 7(1): 35-61.

PDF View
Fig.2- Richard Dam overflow in America

Studying the effect of shape changes in plan of labyrinth weir on increasing flow discharge coefficient using Flow-3D numerical model

FLOW-3D 수치 모델을 이용하여 미로 위어 평면도의 형상 변화가 유량 계수 증가에 미치는 영향 연구

E. Zamiri 1
, H. Karami 2*
and S. Farzin3
1- M.S. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
2
*

  • Corresponding Author, Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Semnan
    University, Semnan, Iran. (hkarami@semnan.ac.ir).
    3- Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

Keywords: : Flood control, Sidewall angle, Predicting discharge coefficient, Computational hydraulic,

Introduction

Weirs are hydraulic structures used to measure, regulate and control the water levels and are
fixed upon open channels and rivers width. Growing magnitude of probable maximum flood
events (PMF) has highlighted the demand for increasing discharge capacity. Application of
labyrinth weir has been suggested as a solution for increasing discharge capacity.
Tullis et al. (1995) evaluated the effective parameters in determining the capacity of a labyrinth
weir. They introduced total head, the effective crest length and the discharge coefficient as
parameters influencing the discharge capacity of a labyrinth weir. Khode et al. (2011)
experimentally studied the parameters of a flow-over labyrinth weir for different side wall angles
(α) from 8 to 30°. They found that discharge coefficient increases by growing side wall angle
values.
Crookston and Tullis (2012a) studied performance of different labyrinth weirs by making
differences between geometric shapes of weirs in plan. The results indicated that discharge
capacity of the arced labyrinth weirs is more than the discharge capacity of horseshoe weirs.
Seo et al. (2016) investigated the effect of weir shapes on discharge of weirs. It was shown that
the discharge of the labyrinth weir had an increase of approximately 71% in comparison with the
linear ogee weir.
In this research, labyrinth weir with sidewall angle equal to 6° was simulated through Flow3D model, using experimental results of previous researchers. After validation, the changes of
discharge coefficient of weir with angles of 45° and 85° and apex shapes of triangular and halfcircular shapes were analyzed.

Weirs는 수위를 측정, 조절 및 제어하는 ​​데 사용되는 수력 구조물이며 열린 수로 및 강 폭에 고정됩니다. 예상되는 최대 홍수 사건 (PMF)의 규모가 커짐에 따라 배출 용량 증가에 대한 요구가 강조되었습니다. 미로 위어 (labyrinth weir)의 적용은 배출 용량을 증가시키기 위한 해결책으로 제안 되었습니다.

Tullis et al. (1995)는 미로 위어의 용량을 결정하는데 효과적인 매개 변수를 평가했습니다. 그들은 미로 위어의 배출 용량에 영향을 미치는 매개 변수로 총 수두, 유효 문장 길이 및 배출 계수를 도입했습니다.

Khode et al. (2011)은 8 ~ 30 °의 다양한 측벽 각도 (α)에 대한 유동-오버 래비 린스 위어의 매개 변수를 실험적으로 연구했습니다.

그들은 측벽 각도 값이 증가함에 따라 방전 계수가 증가한다는 것을 발견했습니다. Crookston과 Tullis (2012a)는 평면에서 위어의 기하학적 모양을 차이를 만들어 서로 다른 미로 위어의 성능을 연구했습니다.

결과는 호형 미로 위어의 배출 용량이 말굽 위어의 배출 용량보다 더 많다는 것을 나타냅니다. Seo et al. (2016)은 위어의 배출에 대한 위어 모양의 영향을 조사했습니다. 미로 위어의 배출량은 선형 오지 위어에 비해 약 71 % 증가한 것으로 나타났습니다.

이 연구에서는 이전 연구자들의 실험 결과를 사용하여 Flow3D 모델을 통해 측벽 각도가 6 ° 인 미로 위어를 시뮬레이션했습니다. 검증 후 각 45 °, 85 °의 위어의 배출 계수 변화와 삼각형 및 반원 형태의 정점 형태를 분석 하였다.

Fig.1- Schematic of trapezoidal, triangular, and rectangular congressional overflow
Fig.1- Schematic of trapezoidal, triangular, and rectangular congressional overflow
Fig.2- Richard Dam overflow in America
Fig.2- Richard Dam overflow in America
Fig.3- Plan of geometric parameters of congressional overflow
Fig.3- Plan of geometric parameters of congressional overflow
Fig. 4- The boundary conditions of the congressional overflow model
Fig. 4- The boundary conditions of the congressional overflow model
Fig.5- View of a simulated congressional overflow
Fig.5- View of a simulated congressional overflow
Fig. 6- Comparison of discharge coefficients resulted from numerical and experimental models
Fig. 6- Comparison of discharge coefficients resulted from numerical and experimental models
Fig.7- The relationship between Cd and Q for different angles of the congressional overflow wall
Fig.7- The relationship between Cd and Q for different angles of the congressional overflow wall
Fig. 8- The relationship between Cd and HT/p for different angles of the congressional overflow wall
Fig. 8- The relationship between Cd and HT/p for different angles of the congressional overflow wall
Table 3- The correlation of Q and HT/p with Cd for different angles of the overflow wall
Table 3- The correlation of Q and HT/p with Cd for different angles of the overflow wall
Fig. 9- The congressional overflow with linear, semicircular and triangular spans
Fig. 9- The congressional overflow with linear, semicircular and triangular spans
Fig. 10- The relationship between Cd and Q for different forms of congressional overflow
Fig. 10- The relationship between Cd and Q for different forms of congressional overflow
Fig. 11- The relationship of Cd and HT/p under different forms of congressional overflow
Fig. 11- The relationship of Cd and HT/p under different forms of congressional overflow
Fig. 12- The relationship Cd other/Cd simple and HT/p in a congressional overflow
Fig. 12- The relationship Cd other/Cd simple and HT/p in a congressional overflow
Fig. 13- Comparison of discharge coefficients resulted from a numerical model and proposed relation
Fig. 13- Comparison of discharge coefficients resulted from a numerical model and proposed relation
Fig. 14- Comparison of Cd from the present study and other studies for 6 angle congressional overflow
Fig. 14- Comparison of Cd from the present study and other studies for 6 angle congressional overflow
Fig. 15- The relationship between the discharge coefficient and HT/p for 6 ◦ angle congressional overflow
Fig. 15- The relationship between the discharge coefficient and HT/p for 6 ◦ angle congressional overflow

Results

오버행의 넘침 흐름을 증가시키는 것이 중요하기 때문에 본 연구에서는 넘침 벽의 돌출부에 6, 45 및 85 도의 세 가지 값을 채점하고 넘침 개구부에 삼각형 및 반원 모양을 제안함으로써 , 오버 플로우의 오버 플로우 계수를 변경하여 3D 숫자 래치를 사용하십시오.

Irene Par Vahsh Bareh에서 얻은 결과는 다음과 같습니다.

1- 흐름을 따라 포병의 범람 벽 각도를 늘리면 방출 계수가 증가합니다. 벽 각도가 85도 및 45 도인 포병의 범람 계수는 벽 각도가 6 도인 범람 계수 평균의 2.28 및 1.24 배입니다.

2-구부러진 양고기를 먹은 상태에서 배수로 모양의 변화는 배출 계수를 증가시킨다. 삼각형과 비 삼각형 개구부가있는 오버플로의 배출 계수는 온대 개구부가있는 오버플로의 배출 계수에 비해 양고기가 50.29 및 4.16 % 증가했습니다.

3- 오버플로 양 (p / HT)의 부하와 함께 부하 부하의 무 차원 비율 값을 늘리면 혼잡 한 오버플로의 방전 계수가 감소합니다. 또한 p <HT / 0.5의 값에서 세 가지 형태의 오버플로 개구에 대한 배출 계수의 값은 서로 가깝고 오버플로 모양의 각 끝은 값에서 동일한 기능을 갖습니다. p / HT <0.5. 4-유량이 증가함에 따라 유량 계수가 감소합니다.

References

1- Azhdary Moghaddam, M. and Jafari Nodoushan, E., 2013. Optimization of Geometry of
trapezoidallabyrinth Spillway with using ANFIS Models and Genetic Algorithms (Ute Dam Case Study
in the United States of America). Journal of Civil Engineering. 24(2), pp. 129-138. (In Persian).
2- Canholi, J. F., Canholi, A. P. and Sobral, V., 2011. Hydraulic Design of a Labyrinth Weir in
Aclimação´s Lake. 12nd International Conference on Urban Drainage, Porto Alegre/Brazil.
3- Crookston, B. M. and Tullis, B. P., 2012a. Arced labyrinth weirs. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering. 138(6), pp.555-562.
4- Crookston, B. M. and Tullis, B. P., 2012b, Hydraulic design and analysis of labyrinth weirs. I:
Discharge relationships. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 139(5), pp.363-370.
5- Esmaeili Varaki, M. and Safarrazavi Zadeh, M., 2013. Study of Hydraulic Features of Flow Over
Labyrinth Weir with Semi-circular Plan form. Journal of Water and Soil. 27(1), pp. 224-234. (In
Persian).
6- Farzin, S., Karami, H. and Zamiri, E., 2016. Study of the Flow over Rubber Dam Using Computational
Hydrodynamics. Journal of Dam and Hydroelectric Powerplant. 3(9), pp.1-11. (In Persian).
7- Hirt, C. W. and Richardson, J. E., 1999. The modeling of shallow flows, Flow Science, Technical
Notes. 48, pp.1-14.
8- Hosseini, K., Tajnesaie, M. and Jafari Nodoush, E., 2015. Optimization of the Geometry of Triangular
Labyrinth Spillways, Using Fuzzy‐Neural System and Differential Evolution Algorithm. Journal of
Civil and Environmental Engineering. 45(1), PP.81-91. (In Persian).
9- Khode, B. V., Tembhurkar, A. R., Porey, P. D. and Ingle, R. N., 2011. Experimental studies on flow
over labyrinth weir. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 138(6), pp.548-552.
10- Nezami, F., Farsadizadeh, D., Hosseinzadeh Delir, A. and Salmasi, F., 2012. Experimental Study of
Discharge Coefficient of Trapezoidal Labyrinth Side-Weirs. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 23(1),
PP.247-257. (In Persian).
11- Nikpiek, P. and Kashefipour, S. M., 2014. Effect of the hydraulic conditions and structure geometry on
mathematical modelling of discharge coefficient for duckbill and oblique weirs. Journal of Irrigation
Science and Engineering. 39(1), pp.1-10. (In Persian).
12- Noori, B. M. and Aaref, N. T., 2017. Hydraulic Performance of Circular Crested Triangular Plan Form
Weirs. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. pp.1-10.
13- Noruzi, S. and Ahadiyan, J., 2016. Effect of Vortex Breaker Blades 45 Degree on Discharge
Coefficient of Morning Glory Spillway Using Flow-3D. Journal of Irrigation Science and
Engineering. 39(4), PP. 47-58. (In Persian).
14- Paxson, G. and Savage, B., 2006. Labyrinth spillways: comparison of two popular USA design
methods and consideration of non-standard approach conditions and geometries. Proceedings of the
international junior researcher and engineer workshop on hydraulic structures, Montemor-o-Novo,
Portugal, Division of Civil Engineering, 37.
15- Payri, R., Tormos, B., Gimeno, J. and Bracho, G., 2010. The potential of Large Eddy Simulation (LES)
code for the modeling of flow in diesel injectors. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 52(7),
pp.1151-1160.
16- Rezaee, M., Emadi, A. and Aqajani Mazandarani, Q., 2016. Experimental Study of Rectangular
Labyrinth Weir. Journal of Water and Soil. 29(6), pp. 1438-1446. (In Persian).
17- Seo, I. W., Do Kim, Y., Park, Y. S. and Song, C. G. 2016, Spillway discharges by modification of weir
shapes and overflow surroundings. Environmental Earth Sciences. 75(6), pp.1-13.
18- Suprapto, M., 2013. Increase spillway capacity using Labyrinth Weir. Procedia Engineering. 54, pp.
440-446.
19- Tullis, J. P., Amanian, N. and Waldron, D., 1995. Design of labyrinth spillways. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering. 121(3), pp.247-255.
20- Zamiri, E., Karami, H. and Farzin, S., 2016. Numerical Study of Labyrinth Weir Using RNG
Turbulence Model. 15th Iranian Hydraulic Conference, Imam Khomeini International University,
Qazvin, Iran. (In Persian).

PDF Download
The 3D computational domain model (50–18.6) slope change, and boundary condition for (50–30 slope change) model.

Numerical investigation of flow characteristics over stepped spillways

Güven, Aytaç
Mahmood, Ahmed Hussein
Water Supply (2021) 21 (3): 1344–1355.
https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.283Article history

Abstract

Spillways are constructed to evacuate flood discharge safely so that a flood wave does not overtop the dam body. There are different types of spillways, with the ogee type being the conventional one. A stepped spillway is an example of a nonconventional spillway. The turbulent flow over a stepped spillway was studied numerically by using the Flow-3D package. Different fluid flow characteristics such as longitudinal flow velocity, temperature distribution, density and chemical concentration can be well simulated by Flow-3D. In this study, the influence of slope changes on flow characteristics such as air entrainment, velocity distribution and dynamic pressures distribution over a stepped spillway was modelled by Flow-3D. The results from the numerical model were compared with an experimental study done by others in the literature. Two models of a stepped spillway with different discharge for each model were simulated. The turbulent flow in the experimental model was simulated by the Renormalized Group (RNG) turbulence scheme in the numerical model. A good agreement was achieved between the numerical results and the observed ones, which are exhibited in terms of graphics and statistical tables.

배수로는 홍수가 댐 몸체 위로 넘치지 않도록 안전하게 홍수를 피할 수 있도록 건설되었습니다. 다른 유형의 배수로가 있으며, ogee 유형이 기존 유형입니다. 계단식 배수로는 비 전통적인 배수로의 예입니다. 계단식 배수로 위의 난류는 Flow-3D 패키지를 사용하여 수치적으로 연구되었습니다.

세로 유속, 온도 분포, 밀도 및 화학 농도와 같은 다양한 유체 흐름 특성은 Flow-3D로 잘 시뮬레이션 할 수 있습니다. 이 연구에서는 계단식 배수로에 대한 공기 혼입, 속도 분포 및 동적 압력 분포와 같은 유동 특성에 대한 경사 변화의 영향을 Flow-3D로 모델링 했습니다.

수치 모델의 결과는 문헌에서 다른 사람들이 수행한 실험 연구와 비교되었습니다. 각 모델에 대해 서로 다른 배출이 있는 계단식 배수로의 두 모델이 시뮬레이션되었습니다. 실험 모델의 난류 흐름은 수치 모델의 Renormalized Group (RNG) 난류 계획에 의해 시뮬레이션되었습니다. 수치 결과와 관찰 된 결과 사이에 좋은 일치가 이루어졌으며, 이는 그래픽 및 통계 테이블로 표시됩니다.

HIGHLIGHTS

ListenReadSpeaker webReader: Listen

  • A numerical model was developed for stepped spillways.
  • The turbulent flow was simulated by the Renormalized Group (RNG) model.
  • Both numerical and experimental results showed that flow characteristics are greatly affected by abrupt slope change on the steps.

Keyword

CFD, numerical modelling, slope change, stepped spillway, turbulent flow

INTRODUCTION

댐 구조는 물 보호가 생활의 핵심이기 때문에 물을 저장하거나 물을 운반하는 전 세계에서 가장 중요한 프로젝트입니다. 그리고 여수로는 댐의 가장 중요한 부분 중 하나로 분류됩니다. 홍수로 인한 파괴 나 피해로부터 댐을 보호하기 위해 여수로가 건설됩니다.

수력 발전, 항해, 레크리에이션 및 어업의 중요성을 감안할 때 댐 건설 및 홍수 통제는 전 세계적으로 매우 중요한 문제로 간주 될 수 있습니다. 많은 유형의 배수로가 있지만 가장 일반적인 유형은 다음과 같습니다 : ogee 배수로, 자유 낙하 배수로, 사이펀 배수로, 슈트 배수로, 측면 채널 배수로, 터널 배수로, 샤프트 배수로 및 계단식 배수로.

그리고 모든 여수로는 입구 채널, 제어 구조, 배출 캐리어 및 출구 채널의 네 가지 필수 구성 요소로 구성됩니다. 특히 롤러 압축 콘크리트 (RCC) 댐 건설 기술과 더 쉽고 빠르며 저렴한 건설 기술로 분류 된 계단식 배수로 건설과 관련하여 최근 수십 년 동안 많은 계단식 배수로가 건설되었습니다 (Chanson 2002; Felder & Chanson 2011).

계단식 배수로 구조는 캐비테이션 위험을 감소시키는 에너지 소산 속도를 증가시킵니다 (Boes & Hager 2003b). 계단식 배수로는 다양한 조건에서 더 매력적으로 만드는 장점이 있습니다.

계단식 배수로의 흐름 거동은 일반적으로 낮잠, 천이 및 스키밍 흐름 체제의 세 가지 다른 영역으로 분류됩니다 (Chanson 2002). 유속이 낮을 때 nappe 흐름 체제가 발생하고 자유 낙하하는 낮잠의 시퀀스로 특징 지워지는 반면, 스키밍 흐름 체제에서는 물이 외부 계단 가장자리 위의 유사 바닥에서 일관된 흐름으로 계단 위로 흐릅니다.

또한 주요 흐름에서 3 차원 재순환 소용돌이가 발생한다는 것도 분명합니다 (예 : Chanson 2002; Gonzalez & Chanson 2008). 계단 가장자리 근처의 의사 바닥에서 흐름의 방향은 가상 바닥과 가상으로 정렬됩니다. Takahashi & Ohtsu (2012)에 따르면, 스키밍 흐름 체제에서 주어진 유속에 대해 흐름은 계단 가장자리 근처의 수평 계단면에 영향을 미치고 슈트 경사가 감소하면 충돌 영역의 면적이 증가합니다. 전이 흐름 체제는 나페 흐름과 스키밍 흐름 체제 사이에서 발생합니다. 계단식 배수로를 설계 할 때 스키밍 흐름 체계를 고려해야합니다 (예 : Chanson 1994, Matos 2000, Chanson 2002, Boes & Hager 2003a).

CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics), 즉 수력 공학의 수치 모델은 일반적으로 물리적 모델에 소요되는 총 비용과 시간을 줄여줍니다. 따라서 수치 모델은 실험 모델보다 빠르고 저렴한 것으로 분류되며 동시에 하나 이상의 목적으로 사용될 수도 있습니다. 사용 가능한 많은 CFD 소프트웨어 패키지가 있지만 가장 널리 사용되는 것은 FLOW-3D입니다. 이 연구에서는 Flow 3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 유량이 서로 다른 두 모델에 대해 계단식 배수로에서 공기 농도, 속도 분포 및 동적 압력 분포를 시뮬레이션합니다.

Roshan et al. (2010)은 서로 다른 수의 계단 및 배출을 가진 계단식 배수로의 두 가지 물리적 모델에 대한 흐름 체제 및 에너지 소산 조사를 연구했습니다. 실험 모델의 기울기는 각각 19.2 %, 12 단계와 23 단계의 수입니다. 결과는 23 단계 물리적 모델에서 관찰 된 흐름 영역이 12 단계 모델보다 더 수용 가능한 것으로 간주되었음을 보여줍니다. 그러나 12 단계 모델의 에너지 손실은 23 단계 모델보다 더 많았습니다. 그리고 실험은 스키밍 흐름 체제에서 23 단계 모델의 에너지 소산이 12 단계 모델보다 약 12 ​​% 더 적다는 것을 관찰했습니다.

Ghaderi et al. (2020a)는 계단 크기와 유속이 다른 정련 매개 변수의 영향을 조사하기 위해 계단식 배수로에 대한 실험 연구를 수행했습니다. 그 결과, 흐름 체계가 냅페 흐름 체계에서 발생하는 최소 scouring 깊이와 같은 scouring 구멍 치수에 영향을 미친다는 것을 보여주었습니다. 또한 테일 워터 깊이와 계단 크기는 최대 scouring깊이에 대한 실제 매개 변수입니다. 테일 워터의 깊이를 6.31cm에서 8.54 및 11.82cm로 늘림으로써 수세 깊이가 각각 18.56 % 및 11.42 % 증가했습니다. 또한 이 증가하는 테일 워터 깊이는 scouring 길이를 각각 31.43 % 및 16.55 % 감소 시킵니다. 또한 유속을 높이면 Froude 수가 증가하고 흐름의 운동량이 증가하면 scouring이 촉진됩니다. 또한 결과는 중간의 scouring이 횡단면의 측벽보다 적다는 것을 나타냅니다. 계단식 배수로 하류의 최대 scouring 깊이를 예측 한 후 실험 결과와 비교하기 위한 실험식이 제안 되었습니다. 그리고 비교 결과 제안 된 공식은 각각 3.86 %와 9.31 %의 상대 오차와 최대 오차 내에서 scouring 깊이를 예측할 수 있음을 보여주었습니다.

Ghaderi et al. (2020b)는 사다리꼴 미로 모양 (TLS) 단계의 수치 조사를 했습니다. 결과는 이러한 유형의 배수로가 확대 비율 LT / Wt (LT는 총 가장자리 길이, Wt는 배수로의 폭)를 증가시키기 때문에 더 나은 성능을 갖는 것으로 관찰되었습니다. 또한 사다리꼴 미로 모양의 계단식 배수로는 더 큰 마찰 계수와 더 낮은 잔류 수두를 가지고 있습니다. 마찰 계수는 다양한 배율에 대해 0.79에서 1.33까지 다르며 평평한 계단식 배수로의 경우 대략 0.66과 같습니다. 또한 TLS 계단식 배수로에서 잔류 수두의 비율 (Hres / dc)은 약 2.89이고 평평한 계단식 배수로의 경우 약 4.32와 같습니다.

Shahheydari et al. (2015)는 Flow-3D 소프트웨어, RNG k-ε 모델 및 VOF (Volume of Fluid) 방법을 사용하여 배출 계수 및 에너지 소산과 같은 자유 표면 흐름의 프로파일을 연구하여 스키밍 흐름 체제에서 계단식 배수로에 대한 흐름을 조사했습니다. 실험 결과와 비교했습니다. 결과는 에너지 소산 율과 방전 계수율의 관계가 역으로 실험 모델의 결과와 잘 일치 함을 보여 주었다.

Mohammad Rezapour Tabari & Tavakoli (2016)는 계단 높이 (h), 계단 길이 (L), 계단 수 (Ns) 및 단위 폭의 방전 (q)과 같은 다양한 매개 변수가 계단식 에너지 ​​소산에 미치는 영향을 조사했습니다. 방수로. 그들은 해석에 FLOW-3D 소프트웨어를 사용하여 계단식 배수로에서 에너지 손실과 임계 흐름 깊이 사이의 관계를 평가했습니다. 또한 유동 난류에 사용되는 방정식과 표준 k-ɛ 모델을 풀기 위해 유한 체적 방법을 적용했습니다. 결과에 따르면 스텝 수가 증가하고 유량 배출량이 증가하면 에너지 손실이 감소합니다. 얻은 결과를 다른 연구와 비교하고 경험적, 수학적 조사를 수행하여 결국 합격 가능한 결과를 얻었습니다.

METHODOLOGY

ListenReadSpeaker webReader: ListenFor all numerical models the basic principle is very similar: a set of partial differential equations (PDE) present the physical problems. The flow of fluids (gas and liquid) are governed by the conservation laws of mass, momentum and energy. For Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), the PDE system is substituted by a set of algebraic equations which can be worked out by using numerical methods (Versteeg & Malalasekera 2007). Flow-3D uses the finite volume approach to solve the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation, by applying the technique of Fractional Area/Volume Obstacle Representation (FAVOR) to define an obstacle (Flow Science Inc. 2012). Equations (1) and (2) are RANS and continuity equations with FAVOR variables that are applied for incompressible flows.

formula

(1)

formula

(2)where  is the velocity in xi direction, t is the time,  is the fractional area open to flow in the subscript directions,  is the volume fraction of fluid in each cell, p is the hydrostatic pressure,  is the density, is the gravitational force in subscript directions and  is the Reynolds stresses.

Turbulence modelling is one of three key elements in CFD (Gunal 1996). There are many types of turbulence models, but the most common are Zero-equation models, One-equation models, Two-equation models, Reynolds Stress/Flux models and Algebraic Stress/Flux models. In FLOW-3D software, five turbulence models are available. The formulation used in the FLOW-3D software differs slightly from other formulations that includes the influence of the fractional areas/volumes of the FAVORTM method and generalizes the turbulence production (or decay) associated with buoyancy forces. The latter generalization, for example, includes buoyancy effects associated with non-inertial accelerations.

The available turbulence models in Flow-3D software are the Prandtl Mixing Length Model, the One-Equation Turbulent Energy Model, the Two-Equation Standard  Model, the Two-Equation Renormalization-Group (RNG) Model and large Eddy Simulation Model (Flow Science Inc. 2012).In this research the RNG model was selected because this model is more commonly used than other models in dealing with particles; moreover, it is more accurate to work with air entrainment and other particles. In general, the RNG model is classified as a more widely-used application than the standard k-ɛ model. And in particular, the RNG model is more accurate in flows that have strong shear regions than the standard k-ɛ model and it is defined to describe low intensity turbulent flows. For the turbulent dissipation  it solves an additional transport equation:

formula

(3)where CDIS1, CDIS2, and CDIS3 are dimensionless parameters and the user can modify them. The diffusion of dissipation, Diff ɛ, is

formula

(4)where u, v and w are the x, y and z coordinates of the fluid velocity; ⁠, ⁠,  and ⁠, are FLOW-3D’s FAVORTM defined terms;  and  are turbulence due to shearing and buoyancy effects, respectively. R and  are related to the cylindrical coordinate system. The default values of RMTKE, CDIS1 and CNU differ, being 1.39, 1.42 and 0.085 respectively. And CDIS2 is calculated from turbulent production (⁠⁠) and turbulent kinetic energy (⁠⁠).The kinematic turbulent viscosity is the same in all turbulence transport models and is calculated from

formula

(5)where ⁠: is the turbulent kinematic viscosity.  is defined as the numerical challenge between the RNG and the two-equation k-ɛ models, found in the equation below. To avoid an unphysically large result for  in Equation (3), since this equation could produce a value for  very close to zero and also because the physical value of  may approach to zero in such cases, the value of  is calculated from the following equation:

formula

(6)where ⁠: the turbulent length scale.

VOF and FAVOR are classifications of volume-fraction methods. In these two methods, firstly the area should be subdivided into a control volume grid or a small element. Each flow parameter like velocity, temperature and pressure values within the element are computed for each element containing liquids. Generally, these values represent the volumetric average of values in the elements.Numerous methods have been used recently to solve free infinite boundaries in the various numerical simulations. VOF is an easy and powerful method created based on the concept of a fractional intensity of fluid. A significant number of studies have confirmed that this method is more flexible and efficient than others dealing with the configurations of a complex free boundary. By using VOF technology the Flow-3D free surface was modelled and first declared in Hirt & Nichols (1981). In the VOF method there are three ingredients: a planner to define the surface, an algorithm for tracking the surface as a net mediator moving over a computational grid, and application of the boundary conditions to the surface. Configurations of the fluids are defined in terms of VOF function, F (x, y, z, t) (Hirt & Nichols 1981). And this VOF function shows the volume of flow per unit volume

formula

(7)

formula

(8)

formula

(9)where  is the density of the fluid, is a turbulent diffusion term,  is a mass source,  is the fractional volume open to flow. The components of velocity (u, v, w) are in the direction of coordinates (x, y, z) or (r, ⁠).  in the x-direction is the fractional area open to flow,  and  are identical area fractions for flow in the y and z directions. The R coefficient is based on the selection of the coordinate system.

The FAVOR method is a different method and uses another volume fraction technique, which is only used to define the geometry, such as the volume of liquid in each cell used to determine the position of fluid surfaces. Another fractional volume can be used to define the solid surface. Then, this information is used to determine the boundary conditions of the wall that the flow should be adapted for.

Case study

ListenReadSpeaker webReader: Listen

In this study, the experimental results of Ostad Mirza (2016) was simulated. In a channel composed of two 4 m long modules, with a transparent sidewall of height 0.6 m and 0.5 m width. The upstream chute slope (i.e. pseudo-bottom angle) Ɵ1 = 50°, the downstream chute slope Ɵ2 = 30° or 18.6°, the step heights h = 0.06 m, the total number of steps along the 50° chute 41 steps, the total number of steps along the 30° chute 34 steps and the total number of steps along the 18.6° chute 20 steps.

The flume inflow tool contained a jetbox with a maximum opening set to 0.12 meters, designed for passing the maximum unit discharge of 0.48 m2/s. The measurements of the flow properties (i.e. air concentration and velocity) were computed perpendicular to the pseudo-bottom as shown in Figure 1 at the centre of twenty stream-wise cross-sections, along the stepped chute, (i.e. in five steps up on the slope change and fifteen steps down on the slope change, namely from step number −09 to +23 on 50°–30° slope change, or from −09 to +15 on 50°–18.6° slope change, respectively).

Sketch of the air concentration C and velocity V measured perpendicular to the pseudo-bottom used by Mirza (Ostad Mirza 2016).
Sketch of the air concentration C and velocity V measured perpendicular to the pseudo-bottom used by Mirza (Ostad Mirza 2016).

Sketch of the air concentration C and velocity V measured perpendicular to the pseudo-bottom used by Mirza (Ostad Mirza 2016).

Pressure sensors were arranged with the x/l values for different slope change as shown in Table 1, where x is the distance from the step edge, along the horizontal step face, and l is the length of the horizontal step face. The location of pressure sensors is shown in Table 1.Table 1

Location of pressure sensors on horizontal step faces

Θ(°)L(m)x/l (–)
50.0 0.050 0.35 0.64 – – – 
30.0 0.104 0.17 0.50 0.84 – – 
18.6 0.178 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.7 0.88 
Location of pressure sensors on horizontal step faces
Inlet boundary condition for Q = 0.235 m3/s and fluid elevation 4.21834 m.
Inlet boundary condition for Q = 0.235 m3/s and fluid elevation 4.21834 m.

Inlet boundary condition for Q = 0.235 m3/s and fluid elevation 4.21834 m.

Numerical model set-up

ListenReadSpeaker webReader: Listen

A 3D numerical model of hydraulic phenomena was simulated based on an experimental study by Ostad Mirza (2016). The water surcharge and flow pressure over the stepped spillway was computed for two models of a stepped spillway with different discharge for each model. In this study, the package was used to simulate the flow parameters such as air entrainment, velocity distribution and dynamic pressures. The solver uses the finite volume technique to discretize the computational domain. In every test run, one incompressible fluid flow with a free surface flow selected at 20̊ was used for this simulation model. Table 2 shows the variables used in test runs.Table 2

Variables used in test runs

Test no.Θ1 (°)Θ2 (°)h(m)d0q (m3s−1)dc/h (–)
1 50 18.6 0.06 0.045 0.1 2.6 
2 50 18.6 0.06 0.082 0.235 4.6 
3 50 30.0 0.06 0.045 0.1 2.6 
4 50 30.0 0.06 0.082 0.235 4.6 
Table 2 Variables used in test runs

For stepped spillway simulation, several parameters should be specified to get accurate simulations, which is the scope of this research. Viscosity and turbulent, gravity and non-inertial reference frame, air entrainment, density evaluation and drift-flux should be activated for these simulations. There are five different choices in the ‘viscosity and turbulent’ option, in the viscosity flow and Renormalized Group (RNG) model. Then a dynamical model is selected as the second option, the ‘gravity and non-inertial reference frame’. Only the z-component was inputted as a negative 9.81 m/s2 and this value represents gravitational acceleration but in the same option the x and y components will be zero. Air entrainment is selected. Finally, in the drift-flux model, the density of phase one is input as (water) 1,000 kg/m3 and the density of phase two (air) as 1.225 kg/m3. Minimum volume fraction of phase one is input equal to 0.1 and maximum volume fraction of phase two to 1 to allow air concentration to reach 90%, then the option allowing gas to escape at free surface is selected, to obtain closer simulation.

The flow domain is divided into small regions relatively by the mesh in Flow-3D numerical model. Cells are the smallest part of the mesh, in which flow characteristics such as air concentration, velocity and dynamic pressure are calculated. The accuracy of the results and simulation time depends directly on the mesh block size so the cell size is very important. Orthogonal mesh was used in cartesian coordinate systems. A smaller cell size provides more accuracy for results, so we reduced the number of cells whilst including enough accuracy. In this study, the size of cells in x, y and z directions was selected as 0.015 m after several trials.

Figure 3 shows the 3D computational domain model 50–18.6 slope change, that is 6.0 m length, 0.50 m width and 4.23 m height. The 3D model of the computational domain model 50–30 slope changes this to 6.0 m length, 0.50 m width and 5.068 m height and the size of meshes in x, y, and z directions are 0.015 m. For the 50–18.6 slope change model: both total number of active and passive cells = 4,009,952, total number of active cells = 3,352,307, include real cells (used for solving the flow equations) = 3,316,269, open real cells = 3,316,269, fully blocked real cells equal to zero, external boundary cells were 36,038, inter-block boundary cells = 0 (Flow-3D report). For 50–30 slope change model: both total number of active and passive cells = 4,760,002, total number of active cells equal to 4,272,109, including real cells (used for solving the flow equations) were 3,990,878, open real cells = 3,990,878 fully blocked real cells = zero, external boundary cells were 281,231, inter-block boundary cells = 0 (Flow-3D report).

The 3D computational domain model (50–18.6) slope change, and boundary condition for (50–30 slope change) model.
Figure3 The 3D computational domain model (50–18.6) slope change, and boundary condition for (50–30 slope change) model.

Figure 3VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

The 3D computational domain model (50–18.6) slope change, and boundary condition for (50–30 slope change) model.

When solving the Navier-Stokes equation and continuous equations, boundary conditions should be applied. The most important work of boundary conditions is to create flow conditions similar to physical status. The Flow-3D software has many types of boundary condition; each type can be used for the specific condition of the models. The boundary conditions in Flow-3D are symmetry, continuative, specific pressure, grid overlay, wave, wall, periodic, specific velocity, outflow, and volume flow rate.

There are two options to input finite flow rate in the Flow-3D software either for inlet discharge of the system or for the outlet discharge of the domain: specified velocity and volume flow rate. In this research, the X-minimum boundary condition, volume flow rate, has been chosen. For X-maximum boundary condition, outflow was selected because there is nothing to be calculated at the end of the flume. The volume flow rate and the elevation of surface water was set for Q = 0.1 and 0.235 m3/s respectively (Figure 2).

The bottom (Z-min) is prepared as a wall boundary condition and the top (Z-max) is computed as a pressure boundary condition, and for both (Y-min) and (Y-max) as symmetry.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

ListenReadSpeaker webReader: Listen

The air concentration distribution profiles in two models of stepped spillway were obtained at an acquisition time equal to 25 seconds in skimming flow for both upstream and downstream of a slope change 50°–18.6° and 50°–30° for different discharge as in Table 2, and as shown in Figure 4 for 50°–18.6° slope change and Figure 5 for 50°–30° slope change configuration for dc/h = 4.6. The simulation results of the air concentration are very close to the experimental results in all curves and fairly close to that predicted by the advection-diffusion model for the air bubbles suggested by Chanson (1997) on a constant sloping chute.

Figure 4 Experimental and simulated air concentration distribution for steps number −5, +1, +5, +8, +11 and +15 along the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 4.6. VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE Experimental and simulated air concentration distribution for steps number −5, +1, +5, +8, +11 and +15 along the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 4.6.
Figure 4 Experimental and simulated air concentration distribution for steps number −5, +1, +5, +8, +11 and +15 along the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 4.6. VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE Experimental and simulated air concentration distribution for steps number −5, +1, +5, +8, +11 and +15 along the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 4.6.

Figure 4VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Experimental and simulated air concentration distribution for steps number −5, +1, +5, +8, +11 and +15 along the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 4.6.

Figure5 Experimental and simulated air concentration distribution for steps number −5, +1, +5, +11, +19 and +22 along the 50°–30° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6.
Figure5 Experimental and simulated air concentration distribution for steps number −5, +1, +5, +11, +19 and +22 along the 50°–30° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6.

Figure 5VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Experimental and simulated air concentration distribution for steps number −5, +1, +5, +11, +19 and +22 along the 50°–30° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6.

Figure 6VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Figure 6 Experimental and simulated dimensionless velocity distribution for steps number −5, −1, +1, +5, +8, +11 and +15 along the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 2.6.
Figure 6 Experimental and simulated dimensionless velocity distribution for steps number −5, −1, +1, +5, +8, +11 and +15 along the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 2.6.

Experimental and simulated dimensionless velocity distribution for steps number −5, −1, +1, +5, +8, +11 and +15 along the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 2.6.

Figure 7 Experimental and simulated dimensionless velocity distribution for steps number −5, −1, +1, +5. +11, +15 and +22 along the 50°–30° slope change for dc/h = 2.6.
Figure 7 Experimental and simulated dimensionless velocity distribution for steps number −5, −1, +1, +5. +11, +15 and +22 along the 50°–30° slope change for dc/h = 2.6.

Figure 7VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Experimental and simulated dimensionless velocity distribution for steps number −5, −1, +1, +5. +11, +15 and +22 along the 50°–30° slope change for dc/h = 2.6.

But as is shown in all above mentioned figures it is clear that at the pseudo-bottom the CFD results of air concentration are less than experimental ones until the depth of water reaches a quarter of the total depth of water. Also the direction of the curves are parallel to each other when going up towards the surface water and are incorporated approximately near the surface water. For all curves, the cross-section is separate between upstream and downstream steps. Therefore the (-) sign for steps represents a step upstream of the slope change cross-section and the (+) sign represents a step downstream of the slope change cross-section.

The dimensionless velocity distribution (V/V90) profile was acquired at an acquisition time equal to 25 seconds in skimming flow of the upstream and downstream slope change for both 50°–18.6° and 50°–30° slope change. The simulation results are compared with the experimental ones showing that for all curves there is close similarity for each point between the observed and experimental results. The curves increase parallel to each other and they merge near at the surface water as shown in Figure 6 for slope change 50°–18.6° configuration and Figure 7 for slope change 50°–30° configuration. However, at step numbers +1 and +5 in Figure 7 there are few differences between the simulated and observed results, namely the simulation curves ascend regularly meaning the velocity increases regularly from the pseudo-bottom up to the surface water.

Figure 8 (50°–18.6° slope change) and Figure 9 (50°–30° slope change) compare the simulation results and the experimental results for the presented dimensionless dynamic pressure distribution for different points on the stepped spillway. The results show a good agreement with the experimental and numerical simulations in all curves. For some points, few discrepancies can be noted in pressure magnitudes between the simulated and the observed ones, but they are in the acceptable range. Although the experimental data do not completely agree with the simulated results, there is an overall agreement.

Figure 8 Comparison between simulated and experimental results for the dimensionless pressure for steps number −1, −2, −3 and +1, +2 +3 and +20 on the horizontal step faces of 50°–18.6° slope change configuration, for dc/h = 4.6, x is the distance from the step edge.
Figure 8 Comparison between simulated and experimental results for the dimensionless pressure for steps number −1, −2, −3 and +1, +2 +3 and +20 on the horizontal step faces of 50°–18.6° slope change configuration, for dc/h = 4.6, x is the distance from the step edge.

Figure 8VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Comparison between simulated and experimental results for the dimensionless pressure for steps number −1, −2, −3 and +1, +2 +3 and +20 on the horizontal step faces of 50°–18.6° slope change configuration, for dc/h = 4.6, x is the distance from the step edge.

Figure 9 Comparison between simulated and experimental results for the dimensionless pressure for steps number −1, −2, −3 and +1, +2 and +30, +31 on the horizontal step face of 50°–30° slope change configuration, for dc/h = 4.6, x is the distance from the step edge.
Figure 9 Comparison between simulated and experimental results for the dimensionless pressure for steps number −1, −2, −3 and +1, +2 and +30, +31 on the horizontal step face of 50°–30° slope change configuration, for dc/h = 4.6, x is the distance from the step edge.

Figure 9VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Comparison between simulated and experimental results for the dimensionless pressure for steps number −1, −2, −3 and +1, +2 and +30, +31 on the horizontal step face of 50°–30° slope change configuration, for dc/h = 4.6, x is the distance from the step edge.

The pressure profiles were acquired at an acquisition time equal to 70 seconds in skimming flow on 50°–18.6°, where p is the measured dynamic pressure, h is step height and ϒ is water specific weight. A negative sign for steps represents a step upstream of the slope change cross-section and a positive sign represents a step downstream of the slope change cross-section.

Figure 10 shows the experimental streamwise development of dimensionless pressure on the 50°–18.6° slope change for dc/h = 4.6, x/l = 0.35 on 50° sloping chute and x/l = 0.3 on 18.6° sloping chute compared with the numerical simulation. It is obvious from Figure 10 that the streamwise development of dimensionless pressure before slope change (steps number −1, −2 and −3) both of the experimental and simulated results are close to each other. However, it is clear that there is a little difference between the results of the streamwise development of dimensionless pressure at step numbers +1, +2 and +3. Moreover, from step number +3 to the end, the curves get close to each other.

Figure 10 Comparison between experimental and simulated results for the streamwise development of the dimensionless pressure on the 50°–18.6° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6, and x/l = 0.35 on 50° sloping chute and x/l = 0.3 on 18.6° sloping chute.
Figure 10 Comparison between experimental and simulated results for the streamwise development of the dimensionless pressure on the 50°–18.6° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6, and x/l = 0.35 on 50° sloping chute and x/l = 0.3 on 18.6° sloping chute.

Figure 10VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Comparison between experimental and simulated results for the streamwise development of the dimensionless pressure on the 50°–18.6° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6, and x/l = 0.35 on 50° sloping chute and x/l = 0.3 on 18.6° sloping chute.

Figure 11 compares the experimental and the numerical results for the streamwise development of the dimensionless pressure on the 50°–30° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6, and x/l = 0.35 on 50° sloping chute and x/l = 0.17 on 30° sloping chute. It is apparent that the outcomes of the experimental work are close to the numerical results, however, the results of the simulation are above the experimental ones before the slope change, but the results of the simulation descend below the experimental ones after the slope change till the end.

Figure 11 Comparison between experimental and simulated results for the streamwise development of the dimensionless pressure on the 50°–30° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6, and x/l = 0.35 on 50° sloping chute and x/l = 0.17 on 30° sloping chute.
Figure 11 Comparison between experimental and simulated results for the streamwise development of the dimensionless pressure on the 50°–30° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6, and x/l = 0.35 on 50° sloping chute and x/l = 0.17 on 30° sloping chute.

Figure 11VIEW LARGEDOWNLOAD SLIDE

Comparison between experimental and simulated results for the streamwise development of the dimensionless pressure on the 50°–30° slope change, for dc/h = 4.6, and x/l = 0.35 on 50° sloping chute and x/l = 0.17 on 30° sloping chute.

CONCLUSION

ListenReadSpeaker webReader: Listen

In this research, numerical modelling was attempted to investigate the effect of abrupt slope change on the flow properties (air entrainment, velocity distribution and dynamic pressure) over a stepped spillway with two different models and various flow rates in a skimming flow regime by using the CFD technique. The numerical model was verified and compared with the experimental results of Ostad Mirza (2016). The same domain of the numerical model was inputted as in experimental models to reduce errors as much as possible.

Flow-3D is a well modelled tool that deals with particles. In this research, the model deals well with air entrainment particles by observing their results with experimental results. And the reason for the small difference between the numerical and the experimental results is that the program deals with particles more accurately than the laboratory. In general, both numerical and experimental results showed that near to the slope change the flow bulking, air entrainment, velocity distribution and dynamic pressure are greatly affected by abrupt slope change on the steps. Although the extent of the slope change was relatively small, the influence of the slope change was major on flow characteristics.

The Renormalized Group (RNG) model was selected as a turbulence solver. For 3D modelling, orthogonal mesh was used as a computational domain and the mesh grid size used for X, Y, and Z direction was equal to 0.015 m. In CFD modelling, air concentration and velocity distribution were recorded for a period of 25 seconds, but dynamic pressure was recorded for a period of 70 seconds. The results showed that there is a good agreement between the numerical and the physical models. So, it can be concluded that the proposed CFD model is very suitable for use in simulating and analysing the design of hydraulic structures.

이 연구에서 수치 모델링은 두 가지 다른 모델과 다양한 유속을 사용하여 스키밍 흐름 영역에서 계단식 배수로에 대한 유동 특성 (공기 혼입, 속도 분포 및 동적 압력)에 대한 급격한 경사 변화의 영향을 조사하기 위해 시도되었습니다. CFD 기술. 수치 모델을 검증하여 Ostad Mirza (2016)의 실험 결과와 비교 하였다. 오차를 최대한 줄이기 위해 실험 모형과 동일한 수치 모형을 입력 하였다.

Flow-3D는 파티클을 다루는 잘 모델링 된 도구입니다. 이 연구에서 모델은 실험 결과를 통해 결과를 관찰하여 공기 혼입 입자를 잘 처리합니다. 그리고 수치와 실험 결과의 차이가 작은 이유는 프로그램이 실험실보다 입자를 더 정확하게 다루기 때문입니다. 일반적으로 수치 및 실험 결과는 경사에 가까워지면 유동 벌킹, 공기 혼입, 속도 분포 및 동적 압력이 계단의 급격한 경사 변화에 크게 영향을받는 것으로 나타났습니다. 사면 변화의 정도는 상대적으로 작았지만 사면 변화의 영향은 유동 특성에 큰 영향을 미쳤다.

Renormalized Group (RNG) 모델이 난류 솔버로 선택되었습니다. 3D 모델링의 경우 계산 영역으로 직교 메쉬가 사용되었으며 X, Y, Z 방향에 사용 된 메쉬 그리드 크기는 0.015m입니다. CFD 모델링에서 공기 농도와 속도 분포는 25 초 동안 기록되었지만 동적 압력은 70 초 동안 기록되었습니다. 결과는 수치 모델과 물리적 모델간에 좋은 일치가 있음을 보여줍니다. 따라서 제안 된 CFD 모델은 수력 구조물의 설계 시뮬레이션 및 해석에 매우 적합하다는 결론을 내릴 수 있습니다.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

ListenReadSpeaker webReader: Listen

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

REFERENCES

Boes R. M. Hager W. H. 2003a Hydraulic design of stepped spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129 (9), 671–679.
Google Scholar
Boes R. M. Hager W. H. 2003b Two-Phase flow characteristics of stepped spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129 (9), 661–670.
Google Scholar
Chanson H. 1994 Hydraulics of skimming flows over stepped channels and spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Research 32 (3), 445–460.
Google Scholar
Chanson H. 1997 Air Bubble Entrainment in Free Surface Turbulent Shear Flows. Academic Press, London.
Google Scholar
Chanson H. 2002 The Hydraulics of Stepped Chutes and Spillways. Balkema, Lisse, The Netherlands.
Google Scholar
Felder S. Chanson H. 2011 Energy dissipation down a stepped spillway with nonuniform step heights. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 137 (11), 1543–1548.
Google Scholar
Flow Science, Inc. 2012 FLOW-3D v10-1 User Manual. Flow Science, Inc., Santa Fe, CA.
Ghaderi A. Daneshfaraz R. Torabi M. Abraham J. Azamathulla H. M. 2020a Experimental investigation on effective scouring parameters downstream from stepped spillways. Water Supply 20 (5), 1988–1998.
Google Scholar
Ghaderi A. Abbasi S. Abraham J. Azamathulla H. M. 2020b Efficiency of trapezoidal labyrinth shaped stepped spillways. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 72, 101711.
Google Scholar
Gonzalez C. A. Chanson H. 2008 Turbulence and cavity recirculation in air-water skimming flows on a stepped spillway. Journal of Hydraulic Research 46 (1), 65–72.
Google Scholar
Gunal M. 1996 Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Hydraulic Jumps. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK.
Hirt C. W. Nichols B. D. 1981 Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 39 (1), 201–225.
Google Scholar
Matos J. 2000 Hydraulic design of stepped spillways over RCC dams. In: Intl Workshop on Hydraulics of Stepped Spillways (H.-E. Minor & W. Hager, eds). Balkema Publ, Zurich, pp. 187–194.
Google Scholar
Mohammad Rezapour Tabari M. Tavakoli S. 2016 Effects of stepped spillway geometry on flow pattern and energy dissipation. Arabian Journal for Science & Engineering (Springer Science & Business Media BV) 41 (4), 1215–1224.
Google Scholar
Ostad Mirza M. J. 2016 Experimental Study on the Influence of Abrupt Slope Changes on Flow Characteristics Over Stepped Spillways. Communications du Laboratoire de Constructions Hydrauliques, No. 64 (A. J. Schleiss, ed.). Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Roshan R. Azamathulla H. M. Marosi M. Sarkardeh H. Pahlavan H. Ab Ghani A. 2010 Hydraulics of stepped spillways with different numbers of steps. Dams and Reservoirs 20 (3), 131–136.
Google Scholar
Shahheydari H. Nodoshan E. J. Barati R. Moghadam M. A. 2015 Discharge coefficient and energy dissipation over stepped spillway under skimming flow regime. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 19 (4), 1174–1182.
Google Scholar
Takahashi M. Ohtsu I. 2012 Aerated flow characteristics of skimming flow over stepped chutes. Journal of Hydraulic Research 50 (4), 427–434.
Google Scholar
Versteeg H. K. Malalasekera W. 2007 An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Pearson Education, Harlow.
Google Scholar
© 2021 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Full Text View
Figure 47: The course of the level on the physical model [22]

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF FLOW IN SPILLWAY

Author Svoboda, Jiří
Contributors Jandora, Jan (advisor); Holomek, Petr (referee)

Abstract

이 학위 논문의 주제는 Boskovice 상수도의 안전 배수로에서 유량 수치 모델링 솔루션입니다. 디플로마 논문의 소개에서는 기본 오버플로를 일반적으로 설명하고 모양과 유형에 따라 구분합니다. 수역에 사용되는 안전 배수로도 있습니다. 그 다음에는 오버 플로우 계산에 대한 설명, 수학적 모델링 및 사용 된 난류 모델에 대한 설명이 이어집니다. 또한이 작업은 Boskovice 상수도에 대한 기술적 설명, AutoCAD 2020 소프트웨어의 안전 배수로, 경사 및 미끄러짐의 가상 3D 모델 생성, Blender 소프트웨어에서의 검사 및 수리를 다룹니다. 결론적으로 Flow-3D 소프트웨어의 흐름 수치 모델링 결과와 토목 공학부 유압 공학과에서 수행 된 유압 모델 연구와의 후속 비교가 제시됩니다.

The goal of the diploma thesis is the numerical modelling of flow in planned spillway of the Boskovice dam. In the introduction of this diploma thesis are described and divided basic spillways according to their types and profiles. There are also mentioned emergency spillways. Then the thesis introduces the description of calculation of overflow quantity, the description of mathematic modelling and used turbulent models. The next part is concerned with the technical description of the Boskovice dam, the creation of virtual 3D model of spillway and spillway chute in the AutoCAD 2020 software and concerned with the control and revision of model in the Blender software. In the end of the thesis are mentioned results of numeric modelling of flow gained from the Flow-3D software and the comparison of results with the research of hydraulic model implemented at Water structures institute of Faculty of Civil Engineering of BUT.

Keywords: Spillway, numerical model, 3D model, FLOW-3D, Boskovice dam, rockfill dam.

Introduction

상수도 (VD)는 인구에게 식수 공급, 홍수 방지, 발전 등과 같은 긍정적 인 효과만 있는 것이 아닙니다. 안타깝게도 물 작업, 특히 더 많은 양의 물이 남아있는 작업도 중요한 위협 요소가 될 수 있습니다. 수술 중에 자연의 힘이나 심지어 인적 요인의 실패로 인해 사고가 발생할 수 있습니다. 흐름의 수치 모델링을 위해 안전 배수로를 선택한 VD Boskovice의 경우,이 작업은 1 차 범주에 포함됩니다.

이론적 사고는 극도로 높은 경제적 피해를 입히고 환경에 피해를 줄 수 있으며 국가 규모에 사회적 영향을 미치고 큰 인명 손실을 초래할 수 있습니다. 가설적인 사고는 여러 가지 이유로 발생할 수 있습니다. 예를 들어, 홍수가 극심한 동안의 배수로에서 배수로의 마루가 넘쳐 댐의 공기 경사면이 표면 침식으로 이어지고 이후 배수로가 파열 될 수 있습니다.

이러한 사고를 방지하기 위해 VD에 안전 유출 구조물을 구축하고 있으며, 유출이 넘치지 않도록 관련 VD 범주에 해당하는 충분한 용량이 있어야 합니다. 안타깝게도 VD 운영의 역사에서 안전 배수로에 충분한 용량이 없었고 극심한 홍수 흐름 중에 댐이 유출되고 VD 댐이 파열되는 경우가 있습니다. 이러한 이유로 안전 배수로를 설계하는 것은 비용과 시간이 많이 드는 프로세스입니다.

설계 중에는 설계 홍수파 (NPV) 및 제어 홍수파 (KPV)를 안전하게 전달하기 위해 충분한 용량이 사용됩니다. 적절한 설계를 확인하기 위해 안전 배수로의 흐름 모델링이 사용되며, 여기서 물리적 모델이 일반적으로 사용되며 실험실에서 축소 된 규모로 생성됩니다. 수년 동안 컴퓨터 기술 사용 가능성이 증가함에 따라 다양한 소프트웨어에서 수치 모델링을 사용하여 CFD (유체 흐름 시뮬레이션)를 사용하여 안전 배수로의 흐름을 모델링하여 재정 비용을 크게 줄일 수 있었습니다.

<중략>………….

Figure 1: Basic type of sharp-edged overflow (Bazin's overflow) [1]
Figure 1: Basic type of sharp-edged overflow (Bazin’s overflow) [1]
Figure 3: Overflow with a wide crown [1]
Figure 3: Overflow with a wide crown [1]
Figure 4: Schematic longitudinal section of shaft overflow [14]
Figure 4: Schematic longitudinal section of shaft overflow [14]
Figure 5: Overflow over overflow of general cross-section [1]
Figure 5: Overflow over overflow of general cross-section [1]
Figure 6: Imperfect overflow [1]
Figure 6: Imperfect overflow [1]
Figure 7: Types of overflows according to floor plan [1]
Figure 7: Types of overflows according to floor plan [1]
Figure 8: Lateral contraction and lateral constriction coefficient of pillars [1]
Figure 8: Lateral contraction and lateral constriction coefficient of pillars [1]
Figure 9: Schematic comparison of a pressureless jet surface with a pressure and vacuum surface [22]
Figure 9: Schematic comparison of a pressureless jet surface with a pressure and vacuum surface [22]
Figure 14: Situation of external relations of VD Boskovice [17]
Figure 14: Situation of external relations of VD Boskovice [17]
Figure 15: Air slope of VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 15: Air slope of VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 16: Guide slope of VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 16: Guide slope of VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 17: Sampling tower of VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 17: Sampling tower of VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 18: Fountain front safety spillway [24]
Figure 18: Fountain front safety spillway [24]
Figure 19: Sliding of the security object VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 19: Sliding of the security object VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 20: Slip and divergent broth of the security object VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 20: Slip and divergent broth of the security object VD Boskovice [24]
Figure 21: Probable course of the theoretical PV10 000 in Bělá in the profile of the VD Boskovice dam [6]
Figure 21: Probable course of the theoretical PV10 000 in Bělá in the profile of the VD Boskovice dam [6]
Figure 22: Floor plan of the safety spillway and part of the VD Boskovice slip [12]
Figure 22: Floor plan of the safety spillway and part of the VD Boskovice slip [12]
Figure 23: Longitudinal section of BP and slope in the plane of symmetry [12]
Figure 23: Longitudinal section of BP and slope in the plane of symmetry [12]
Figure 24: Modified floor plan of the overflow and chute of VD Boskovice for the creation of a 3D model
Figure 24: Modified floor plan of the overflow and chute of VD Boskovice for the creation of a 3D model
Figure 25: Created overflow structure without modification
Figure 25: Created overflow structure without modification
Figure 26: Created overflow structure after treatment
Figure 26: Created overflow structure after treatment
Figure 27: Detail of the modified overflow shape
Figure 27: Detail of the modified overflow shape
Figure 33: 3D model with normals shown in blue
Figure 33: 3D model with normals shown in blue
Figure 37: Improperly selected mesh block size
Figure 37: Improperly selected mesh block size
Figure 45: Flow profile in Flow-3D without 3D model displayed
Figure 45: Flow profile in Flow-3D without 3D model displayed
Figure 47: The course of the level on the physical model [22]
Figure 47: The course of the level on the physical model [22]
Figure 51: Comparison of levels in PFm4a
Figure 51: Comparison of levels in PFm4a
Figure 52: Isoline of overflow pressures at flow Q = 173.49 m3/s
Figure 52: Isoline of overflow pressures at flow Q = 173.49 m3/s

결론

이 학위 논문에서는 Flow-3D 소프트웨어에서 Boskovice 상수도의 계획된 안전 오버플로 흐름을 시뮬레이션했습니다. 계획된 안전 범람의 범람 가장자리 길이는 21.99m입니다. 그러나 VD Boskovice의 재건 내에서 VD Boskovice [7]의 수력 학적 모델 연구 결과에 따라 안전 개체 VD Boskovice [7]의 결론에 따라 24.60m로 증가했습니다.

MBH 수준 (해발 432.30m)에서는 최고 유량 Q10 000 = 186.5 m3 / s로 제어 홍수 파 KPV10 000의 안전한 전송이 없지만 유량 Q = 167.0 m3 / s 만 있기 때문에 에스. 이 진술은 Flow-3D에서 난류 RNG k – ε 모델을 사용한 수치 적 흐름 모델링에 의해 확인되었으며 MBH에서 173.49 m3 / s의 유속을보고했습니다.

따라서 수력학적 모델 연구 [7]와 Flow3D의 수치 적 흐름 모델링 간의 차이는 약 3.7 % 였는데, 이는 물리적 모델의 형상 또는 생성 된 형상의 가능한 오류와 같은 다양한 요인으로 인한 것일 수 있습니다. 가상 3D 모델. 또한 실제 모델에서 측정하는 동안 발생할 수 있는 오류 (예 : 오버플로 높이 또는 흐름 값을 결정할 때의 장치 오류). 수치 모델의 경우 차이는 사용 된 셀 네트워크 셀 크기, 거칠기, 전류 폭기의 무시, 수치 적 방법에 의해 주어진 불확실성 또는 3D 모델의 단순화로 인한 것일 수 있습니다.

이러한 요소는 Flow-3D 소프트웨어에서 시뮬레이션 된 레벨의 과정에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 일부 영역에서는 유압 모델 연구 [7]의 현재 깊이와 센티미터 단위 만 다릅니다. 그러나 일부 영역에서는 이러한 차이가 수십 센티미터 정도, 예외적으로 1m 측벽에서 더 두드러지며 이는 Flow-3D 소프트웨어의 유동 시뮬레이션에서는 발생하지 않았습니다.

Flow-3D의 흐름에 의한 수치 모델링에 따르면, Q10 000 = 186.5 m3 / s의 피크 흐름을 가진 제어 홍수 파 KPV10 000은 해발 432.40 m의 탱크 레벨에서만 안전 오버플로를 통해 전송됩니다. 즉, MBH 레벨보다 10cm 높음. 이 계산은 오버플로 가장자리 21.99m의 너비에 대해 수행되었지만 이미 재구성 된 안전 오버플로 VD Boskovice의 너비는 24.60m입니다.

이전 평가에서 생성 된 항목에 수치 모델링 만 사용하는 것이 완전히 신뢰할 수있는 것은 아님이 분명합니다. 민감도 분석 및 물리적 모델에 대한 수리적 연구와의 후속 비교가 없는 가상 3D 모델. 그러나 향후 몇 년 동안 물리적 모델로 평가할 필요 없이 수치 적 흐름 모델링의 결과가 충분히 신뢰할 수 있다면 실험실에서 수행되는 더 많은 비용이 드는 수력학적 모델 연구를 점진적으로 대체 할 수 있습니다.

Reference

[1] JANDORA, Jan a Jan ŠULC. Hydraulika: Modul 01. Brno: AKADEMICKÉ
NAKLADATELSTVÍ CERM, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7204-512-9.
[2] BOOR, B., J. KUNŠTÁTSKÝ a C. PATOČKA. Hydraulika pro vodohospodářské
stavby. Praha: SNTL, 1968. ISBN 04-710-68.
[3] STARA, Vlastimil a Helena KOUTKOVÁ. 3. Vodohospodářská konference
s mezinárodní účastí: Součinitel přepadu přelivu s kruhově zaoblenou korunou
z fyzikálních experimentů. Brno, 2003. ISBN 80-86433-26-9.
[4] ŘÍHA, Jaromír. Hydrotechnické stavby II: Modul 01 Přehrady. Studijní opora. FAST
VUT v Brně 2006.
[5] JANDORA, Jan. Matematické modelování ve vodním hospodářství. VUT v Brně, 2008.
[6] KŘÍŽ, Tomáš. Manipulační řád pro vodní dílo Boskovice na toku Bělá v km 7,400. Brno,
2020.
[7] ŠULC, Jan a Michal ŽOUŽELA. Hydraulický modelový výzkum bezpečnostního objektu
VD Boskovice na ÚVS Stavební fakulty VUT v Brně. Výzkumná zpráva, LVV-ÚVSFAST VUT v Brně, 2013
[8] Autodesk® AutoCAD® 2020 [Počítačový software]. (2019). https://www.autodesk.cz/
[9] Blender v2.90 [Počítačový software]. (2020). https://www.blender.org/
[10] FLOW-3D® verze 11.0.4 [Počítačový software]. (2015). Santa Fe, NM: Flow Science,
Inc. https://www.flow3d.com
[11] Why FLOW-3D? Flow-3D [online]. [cit. 2020-11-03]. Dostupné z:
https://www.flow3d.com/products/flow-3d/why-flow-3d/
[12] Podklady poskytnuté Ing. Petrem Holomkem (Povodí Moravy, s. p.)
[13] CHANSON, H. a J.S. MONTES. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:
Overflow Characteristics of Circular Weirs: Effcets of Inflow Conditions. 3. Reston: The
American Society of Civil Engineers, 1998. ISBN 0733-9437.
[14] KRATOCHVÍL, Jiří, Miloš JANDA a Vlastimil STARA. Projektování přehrad:
Komplexní projekt HT. Brno: Vysoké učení technické v Brně, 1988.
[15] STUDNIČKA, Tomáš. Matematické modelování odlehčovacích komor na stokových
sítích. Brno, 2013. Disertační práce. Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta stavební.
Vedoucí práce Ing. Petr Prax, Ph.D.
[16] ŘÍHA, Jaromír. Hydraulika podzemních vod: Modul 01. Studijní opora. FAST VUT
v Brně 2006.

[17] ArcMap Desktop 10.5 Version: 10.5.0.6491, [Počítačový software]. (2016). Copyright ©
1995-2016 Esri
[18] VD Boskovice. Povodí Moravy [online]. Media Age Digital, s.r.o., 2010-2020. [cit. 2020-
09-08]. Dostupné z: http://www.pmo.cz/cz/o-podniku/vodni-dila/boskovice/.
[19] DESATOVÁ, Martina. Numerické modelování proudění v bezpečnostním přelivu
vybraného vodního díla. Brno, 2020. Diplomová práce. Vysoké učení technické v Brně,
Fakulta stavební, Ústav vodních staveb. Vedoucí práce doc. Ing. Jan Jandora, Ph.D.
[20] HOLINKA, Matouš. Numerické modelování proudění v bezpečnostním objektu vodního
díla. Brno, 2017. Diplomová práce. Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta stavební,
Ústav vodních staveb. Vedoucí práce doc. Ing. Jan Jandora, Ph.D.
[21] KŘIVOHLÁVEK, Roman. Numerické modelování proudění v bezpečnostním přelivu
vodního díla Letovice. Brno, 2018. Diplomová práce. Vysoké učení technické v Brně,
Fakulta stavební, Ústav vodních staveb. Vedoucí práce doc. Ing. Jan Jandora, Ph.D.
[22] ŠULC, Jan, Podklady k přednáškám předmětu CR053 Bezpečnostní objekty
hydrotechnických staveb. Brno, 2020.
[23] HOLEČEK, Miroslav. Hydraulika přelivu sypaných přehrad. Praha, 2006. České vysoké
učení technické v Praze, Fakulta stavební, Katedra hydrotechniky.
[24] Místní šetření dne 17. 12. 2020 za účasti Bc. Jiří Svoboda a Milan Coufal
(Povodí Moravy, s. p.).
[25] JANDORA, Jan, Podklady k přednáškám předmětu CR005 Matematické modelování ve
vodním hospodářství. Brno, 2020.
[26] KOZUBKOVÁ, Milada, Modelování proudění tekutin, FLUENT, CFX. Vysoká škola
Báňská Technická univerzita Ostrava, 2008.

Full Text PDF View
A photo of HeMOSU-1.

FLOW-3D를 이용한 해상 자켓구조물 주변의 세굴 수치모의 실험

Numerical Simulation Test of Scour around Offshore Jacket Structure using FLOW-3D

J Korean Soc Coast Ocean Eng. 2015;27(6):373-381Publication date (electronic) : 2015 December 31doi : https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2015.27.6.373Dong Hui Ko*, Shin Taek Jeong,**, Nam Sun Oh****Hae Poong Engineering Inc.**Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wonkwang University***Ocean·Plant Construction Engineering, Mokpo Maritime National University
고동휘*, 정신택,**, 오남선***

*(주)해풍기술**원광대학교 토목환경공학과***목포해양대학교 해양·플랜트건설공학과

Abstract

해상풍력 기기, 해상 플랫폼과 같은 구조물이 해상에서 빈번하게 설치되면서 세굴에 관한 영향도 중요시되고 있다. 이러한 세굴 영향을 검토하기 위해 세굴 수치모의 실험을 수행한다. 일반적으로 수치모의 조건은 일방향 흐름에 대해서만 검토가 이뤄지고 있으며 서해안과 같은 왕복성 조류 흐름에 대해서는 검토되지 않는다. 본 연구에서는 서해안에 설치된 HeMOSU-1호 해상 자켓구조물 주변에서 발생하는 세굴 현상을 FLOW-3D를 이용하여 수치모의하였다. 해석 조건으로는 일방향 흐름과 조석현상을 고려한 왕복성 흐름을 고려하였으며, 이를 현장 관측값과 비교하였다. 10,000초 동안의 수치모의 결과, 일방향의 흐름 조건에서는 1.32 m의 최대 세굴심이 발생하였으며, 양방향 흐름 조건에서는 1.44 m의 최대 세굴심이 발생하였다. 한편, 현장 관측값의 경우 약 1.5~2.0 m의 세굴심이 발생하여 양방향의 흐름에 대한 해석 결과와 근사한 값을 보였다.

Keywords : 세굴, 일방향 흐름, 왕복성 조류 흐름, 해상 자켓구조물, FLOW-3D, 최대 세굴심, scour,