Modeling of contactless bubble–bubble interactions in microchannels with integrated inertial pumps

Modeling of contactless bubble–bubble interactions in microchannels with integrated inertial pumps

통합 관성 펌프를 사용하여 마이크로 채널에서 비접촉식 기포-기포 상호 작용 모델링

Physics of Fluids 33, 042002 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041924 B. Hayesa) G. L. Whitingb), and  R. MacCurdyc)

ABSTRACT

In this study, the nonlinear effect of contactless bubble–bubble interactions in inertial micropumps is characterized via reduced parameter one-dimensional and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (3D CFD) modeling. A one-dimensional pump model is developed to account for contactless bubble-bubble interactions, and the accuracy of the developed one-dimensional model is assessed via the commercial volume of fluid CFD software, FLOW-3D. The FLOW-3D CFD model is validated against experimental bubble dynamics images as well as experimental pump data. Precollapse and postcollapse bubble and flow dynamics for two resistors in a channel have been successfully explained by the modified one-dimensional model. The net pumping effect design space is characterized as a function of resistor placement and firing time delay. The one-dimensional model accurately predicts cumulative flow for simultaneous resistor firing with inner-channel resistor placements (0.2L < x < 0.8L where L is the channel length) as well as delayed resistor firing with inner-channel resistor placements when the time delay is greater than the time required for the vapor bubble to fill the channel cross section. In general, one-dimensional model accuracy suffers at near-reservoir resistor placements and short time delays which we propose is a result of 3D bubble-reservoir interactions and transverse bubble growth interactions, respectively, that are not captured by the one-dimensional model. We find that the one-dimensional model accuracy improves for smaller channel heights. We envision the developed one-dimensional model as a first-order rapid design tool for inertial pump-based microfluidic systems operating in the contactless bubble–bubble interaction nonlinear regime

이 연구에서 관성 마이크로 펌프에서 비접촉 기포-기포 상호 작용의 비선형 효과는 감소 된 매개 변수 1 차원 및 3 차원 전산 유체 역학 (3D CFD) 모델링을 통해 특성화됩니다. 비접촉식 기포-버블 상호 작용을 설명하기 위해 1 차원 펌프 모델이 개발되었으며, 개발 된 1 차원 모델의 정확도는 유체 CFD 소프트웨어 인 FLOW-3D의 상용 볼륨을 통해 평가됩니다.

FLOW-3D CFD 모델은 실험적인 거품 역학 이미지와 실험적인 펌프 데이터에 대해 검증되었습니다. 채널에 있는 두 저항기의 붕괴 전 및 붕괴 후 기포 및 유동 역학은 수정 된 1 차원 모델에 의해 성공적으로 설명되었습니다. 순 펌핑 효과 설계 공간은 저항 배치 및 발사 시간 지연의 기능으로 특징 지어집니다.

1 차원 모델은 내부 채널 저항 배치 (0.2L <x <0.8L, 여기서 L은 채널 길이)로 동시 저항 발생에 대한 누적 흐름과 시간 지연시 내부 채널 저항 배치로 지연된 저항 발생을 정확하게 예측합니다. 증기 방울이 채널 단면을 채우는 데 필요한 시간보다 큽니다.

일반적으로 1 차원 모델 정확도는 저수지 근처의 저항 배치와 1 차원 모델에 의해 포착되지 않는 3D 기포-저수지 상호 작용 및 가로 기포 성장 상호 작용의 결과 인 짧은 시간 지연에서 어려움을 겪습니다. 채널 높이가 작을수록 1 차원 모델 정확도가 향상됩니다. 우리는 개발 된 1 차원 모델을 비접촉 기포-기포 상호 작용 비선형 영역에서 작동하는 관성 펌프 기반 미세 유체 시스템을 위한 1 차 빠른 설계 도구로 생각합니다.

REFERENCES

1.S. Hassan and X. Zhang, “ Design and fabrication of capillary-driven flow device for point-of-care diagnostics,” Biosensors 10, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10040039, Google ScholarCrossref
2.Q. Shizhi and H. Bau, “ Magneto-hydrodynamics based microfluidics,” Mech. Res. Commun. 36, 10 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.06.013, Google ScholarCrossref
3.N. Mishchuk, T. Heldal, T. Volden, J. Auerswald, and H. Knapp, “ Micropump based on electroosmosis of the second kind,” Electrophoresis 30, 3499 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200900271, Google ScholarCrossref
4.J. Snyder, J. Getpreecharsawas, D. Fang, T. Gaborski, C. Striemer, P. Fauchet, D. Borkholder, and J. McGrath, “ High-performance, low-voltage electroosmotic pumps with molecularly thin silicon nanomembranes,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 18425–18430 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308109110, Google ScholarCrossref
5.K. Vinayakumar, G. Nadiger, V. Shetty, S. Dinesh, M. Nayak, and K. Rajanna, “ Packaged peristaltic micropump for controlled drug delivery application,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 015102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4973513, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
6.D. Duffy, H. Gillis, J. Lin, N. Sheppard, and G. Kellogg, “ Microfabricated centrifugal microfluidic systems: Characterization and multiple enzymatic assays,” Anal. Chem. 71, 4669 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990682c, Google ScholarCrossref
7.V. Gnyawali, M. Saremi, M. Kolios, and S. Tsai, “ Stable microfluidic flow focusing using hydrostatics,” Biomicrofluidics 11, 034104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983147, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
8.J. Lake, K. Heyde, and W. Ruder, “ Low-cost feedback-controlled syringe pressure pumps for microfluidics applications,” PLoS One 12, e0175089 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175089, Google ScholarCrossref
9.M. I. Mohammed, S. Haswell, and I. Gibson, “ Lab-on-a-chip or chip-in-a-lab: Challenges of commercialization lost in translation,” Procedia Technology 20, 54–59 (2015), proceedings of The 1st International Design Technology Conference, DESTECH2015, Geelong. Google ScholarCrossref
10.E. Torniainen, A. Govyadinov, D. Markel, and P. Kornilovitch, “ Bubble-driven inertial micropump,” Phys. Fluids 24, 122003 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4769755, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
11.H. Hoefemann, S. Wadle, N. Bakhtina, V. Kondrashov, N. Wangler, and R. Zengerle, “ Sorting and lysis of single cells by bubblejet technology,” Sens. Actuators, B 168, 442–445 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.04.005, Google ScholarCrossref
12.B. Hayes, A. Hayes, M. Rolleston, A. Ferreira, and J. Kirsher, “ Pulsatory mixing of laminar flow using bubble-driven micro-pumps,” in Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (2018), Vol. 7. Google ScholarCrossref
13.E. Ory, H. Yuan, A. Prosperetti, S. Popinet, and S. Zaleski, “ Growth and collapse of a vapor bubble in a narrow tube,” Phys. Fluids 12, 1268 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.870381, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
14.Z. Yin and A. Prosperetti, “‘ Blinking bubble’ micropump with microfabricated heaters,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 15, 1683 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/15/9/010, Google ScholarCrossref
15.M. Einat and M. Grajower, “ Microboiling measurements of thermal-inkjet heaters,” J. Microelectromech. Syst. 19, 391 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2010.2040946, Google ScholarCrossref
16.A. Govyadinov, P. Kornilovitch, D. Markel, and E. Torniainen, “ Single-pulse dynamics and flow rates of inertial micropumps,” Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20, 73 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-016-1738-x, Google ScholarCrossref
17.E. Sourtiji and Y. Peles, “ A micro-synthetic jet in a microchannel using bubble growth and collapse,” Appl. Therm. Eng. 160, 114084 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114084, Google ScholarCrossref
18.B. Hayes, A. Govyadinov, and P. Kornilovitch, “ Microfluidic switchboards with integrated inertial pumps,” Microfluid. Nanofluid. 22, 15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-2032-2, Google ScholarCrossref
19.P. Kornilovitch, A. Govyadinov, D. Markel, and E. Torniainen, “ One-dimensional model of inertial pumping,” Phys. Rev. E 87, 023012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.023012, Google ScholarCrossref
20.H. Yuan and A. Prosperetti, “ The pumping effect of growing and collapsing bubbles in a tube,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 9, 402–413 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/9/4/318, Google ScholarCrossref
21.J. Zou, B. Li, and C. Ji, “ Interactions between two oscillating bubbles in a rigid tube,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 61, 105 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.10.021, Google ScholarCrossref
22.C. Hirt and B. Nichols, “ Volume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries,” J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201–225 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5, Google ScholarCrossref
23.C. Borgnakke and R. E. Sonntag, Fundamentals of Thermodynamics, 8th ed. ( Wiley, 1999). Google Scholar
24.O. E. Ruiz, “ CFD model of the thermal inkjet droplet ejection process,” in Proceeding of Heat Transfer Summer Conference (2007), Vol. 3. Google ScholarCrossref
25.T. Theofanous, L. Biasi, H. Isbin, and H. Fauske, “ A theoretical study on bubble growth in constant and time-dependent pressure fields,” Chem. Eng. Sci. 24, 885–897 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(69)85008-6, Google ScholarCrossref
26.S. Timoshenko and J. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. ( McGaw-Hill, Inc., 1970). Google Scholar

Fig. 9 (a) Velocity field, keyhole profile, and breakage of the keyhole to form bubble and (b) 2D temperature and velocity field along the longitudinal section

A Numerical Study on the Keyhole Formation During Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process

Keyhole에 대한 수치적 연구 : 레이저 분말 중 형성 베드 퓨전 공정

Subin Shrestha1
J.B. Speed School of Engineering,University of Louisville,Louisville, KY 40292
e-mail: subin.shrestha@louisville.edu

Y. Kevin Chou
J.B. Speed School of Engineering,University of Louisville,Louisville, KY 40292
e-mail: kevin.chou@louisville.edu

LPBF (Laser Powder Bed fusion) 공정 중 용융 풀의 동적 현상은 복잡하고 공정 매개 변수에 민감합니다. 에너지 밀도 입력이 특정 임계 값을 초과하면 키홀이라고 하는 거대한 증기 함몰이 형성 될 수 있습니다.

이 연구는 수치 분석을 통해 LPBF 과정에서 키홀 거동 및 관련 기공 형성을 이해하는 데 중점을 둡니다. 이를 위해 이산 분말 입자가 있는 열 유동 모델이 개발되었습니다.

이산 요소 방법 (DEM)에서 얻은 분말 분포는 계산 영역에 통합되어 FLOW-3D를 사용하는 3D 프로세스 물리학 모델을 개발합니다.

전도 모드 중 용융 풀 형성과 용융의 키홀 모드가 식별되고 설명되었습니다. 높은 에너지 밀도는 증기 기둥의 형성으로 이어지고 결과적으로 레이저 스캔 트랙 아래에 구멍이 생깁니다.

또한 다양한 레이저 출력과 스캔 속도로 인한 Keyhole 모양을 조사합니다. 수치 결과는 동일한 에너지 밀도에서도 레이저 출력이 증가함에 따라 Keyhole크기가 증가 함을 나타냅니다. Keyhole은 더 높은 출력에서 ​​안정되어 레이저 스캔 중 Keyhole 발생을 줄일 수 있습니다.

The dynamic phenomenon of a melt pool during the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is complex and sensitive to process parameters. As the energy density input exceeds a certain threshold, a huge vapor depression may form, known as the keyhole. This study focuses on understanding the keyhole behavior and related pore formation during the LPBF process through numerical analysis. For this purpose, a thermo-fluid model with discrete powder particles is developed. The powder distribution, obtained from a discrete element method (DEM), is incorporated into the computational domain to develop a 3D process physics model using flow-3d. The melt pool formation during the conduction mode and the keyhole mode of melting has been discerned and explained. The high energy density leads to the formation of a vapor column and consequently pores under the laser scan track. Further, the keyhole shape resulted from different laser powers and scan speeds is investigated. The numerical results indicated that the keyhole size increases with the increase in the laser power even with the same energy density. The keyhole becomes stable at a higher power, which may reduce the occurrence of pores during laser scanning.

Keywords: additive manufacturing, keyhole, laser powder bed fusion, porosity

Fig. 1 (a) Powder added to the dispenser platform and (b) powder particles settled over build plate after the recoating process
Fig. 1 (a) Powder added to the dispenser platform and (b) powder particles settled over build plate after the recoating process
Fig. 2 3D computational domain used for single-track simulation
Fig. 2 3D computational domain used for single-track simulation
Fig. 3 Temperature-dependent material properties of Ti-6Al-4V
Fig. 3 Temperature-dependent material properties of Ti-6Al-4V
Fig. 4 Powder and substrate melting during laser application
Fig. 4 Powder and substrate melting during laser application
Fig. 5 Melt region formed after complete melting and solidification
Fig. 5 Melt region formed after complete melting and solidification
Fig. 6 Melt pool boundary comparison between the experiment [25] and the simulation
Fig. 6 Melt pool boundary comparison between the experiment [25] and the simulation
Fig. 7 Equilibrium points during the formation of vapor column [27]
Fig. 7 Equilibrium points during the formation of vapor column [27]
Fig. 8 Multiple reflection vectors from the keyhole wall
Fig. 8 Multiple reflection vectors from the keyhole wall
Fig. 9 (a) Velocity field, keyhole profile, and breakage of the keyhole to form bubble and (b) 2D temperature and velocity field along the longitudinal section
Fig. 9 (a) Velocity field, keyhole profile, and breakage of the keyhole to form bubble and (b) 2D temperature and velocity field along the longitudinal section
Fig. 10 Fluid flow in the transverse direction during keyhole melting
Fig. 10 Fluid flow in the transverse direction during keyhole melting
Fig. 11 Melt pool boundary compared with the experiment [21] for 195 W laser power and 400 mm/s scan speed
Fig. 11 Melt pool boundary compared with the experiment [21] for 195 W laser power and 400 mm/s scan speed
Fig. 12 Melt region formed after complete melting and solidification
Fig. 12 Melt region formed after complete melting and solidification
Fig. 13 2D images of the pores formed at the beginning of the single track and their 3D-rendered morphology
Fig. 13 2D images of the pores formed at the beginning of the single track and their 3D-rendered morphology
Fig. 14 Pore number and volume from a different level of power with LED = 0.4 J/mm [29]
Fig. 14 Pore number and volume from a different level of power with LED = 0.4 J/mm [29]
Fig. 15 Keyhole shape at different time steps from different parameters: (a) P = 100 W, v = 250 mm/s, (b) P = 200 W, v = 500 mm/s, (c) P = 300 W, v = 750 mm/s, and (d) P = 400 W, v = 1000 mm/s
Fig. 15 Keyhole shape at different time steps from different parameters: (a) P = 100 W, v = 250 mm/s, (b) P = 200 W, v = 500 mm/s, (c) P = 300 W, v = 750 mm/s, and (d) P = 400 W, v = 1000 mm/s
Fig. 16 Intensity dependence in the relationship between vapor column and evaporation pressure [27]
Fig. 16 Intensity dependence in the relationship between vapor column and evaporation pressure [27]
Fig. 17 Temperature distribution when laser has moved 0.8 mm with P = 300 W, v = 750 mm/s and P = 400 W, v = 1000 mm/s
Fig. 17 Temperature distribution when laser has moved 0.8 mm with P = 300 W, v = 750 mm/s and P = 400 W, v = 1000 mm/s
Fig. 18 Melt region with different level of power with LED of 0.4 J/mm
Fig. 18 Melt region with different level of power with LED of 0.4 J/mm

References

[1] Bauereiß, A., Scharowsky, T., and Körner, C., 2014, “Defect Generation and
Propagation Mechanism During Additive Manufacturing by Selective Beam
Melting,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 214(11), pp. 2522–2528.
[2] Gong, H., Rafi, K., Gu, H., Starr, T., and Stucker, B., 2014, “Analysis of Defect
Generation in Ti–6Al–4V Parts Made Using Powder Bed Fusion Additive
Manufacturing Processes,” Add. Manuf., 1(2014), pp. 87–98.
[3] Wang, Y., Kamath, C., Voisin, T., and Li, Z., 2018, “A Processing Diagram for
High-Density Ti-6Al-4V by Selective Laser Melting,” Rapid Prototyping J., 24
(9), pp. 1469–1478.
[4] Khairallah, S. A., and Anderson, A., 2014, “Mesoscopic Simulation Model of
Selective Laser Melting of Stainless Steel Powder,” J. Mater. Process. Technol.,
214(11), pp. 2627–2636.
[5] Yadroitsev, I., Gusarov, A., Yadroitsava, I., and Smurov, I., 2010, “Single Track
Formation in Selective Laser Melting of Metal Powders,” J. Mater. Process.
Technol., 210(12), pp. 1624–1631.
[6] Xia, M., Gu, D., Yu, G., Dai, D., Chen, H., and Shi, Q., 2016, “Influence of Hatch
Spacing on Heat and Mass Transfer, Thermodynamics and Laser Processability
During Additive Manufacturing of Inconel 718 Alloy,” Int. J. Mach. Tools
Manuf., 109(2016), pp. 147–157.
[7] Lee, Y., and Zhang, W., 2016, “Modeling of Heat Transfer, Fluid Flow and
Solidification Microstructure of Nickel-Base Superalloy Fabricated by Laser
Powder bed Fusion,” Add. Manuf., 12(2016), pp. 178–188.
[8] Wu, Y.-C., San, C.-H., Chang, C.-H., Lin, H.-J., Marwan, R., Baba, S., and
Hwang, W.-S., 2018, “Numerical Modeling of Melt-Pool Behavior in Selective
Laser Melting with Random Powder Distribution and Experimental
Validation,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 254(2018), pp. 72–78.
[9] Khairallah, S. A., Anderson, A. T., Rubenchik, A., and King, W. E., 2016, “Laser
Powder-bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: Physics of Complex Melt Flow and
Formation Mechanisms of Pores, Spatter, and Denudation Zones,” Acta
Materialia, 108(2016), pp. 36–45.
[10] Tan, J., Tang, C., and Wong, C., 2018, “A Computational Study on Porosity
Evolution in Parts Produced by Selective Laser Melting,” Metall. Mater. Trans.
A, 49A(8), pp. 3663–3673.
[11] Leitz, K.-H., Singer, P., Plankensteiner, A., Tabernig, B., Kestler, H., and Sigl,
L. J. M. P. R., 2017, “Multi-Physical Simulation of Selective Laser Melting,”
Metal Powder Report, 72(5), pp. 331–338.
[12] Zhao, C., Fezzaa, K., Cunningham, R. W., Wen, H., Carlo, F., Chen, L., Rollett,
A. D., and Sun, T., 2017, “Real-time Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Process Using High-Speed X-ray Imaging and Diffraction,” Sci. Rep., 7(1),
p. 3602.
[13] Parab, N. D., Zhao, C., Cunningham, R., Escano, L. I., Fezzaa, K., Everhart, W.,
Rollett, A. D., Chen, L., and Sun, T., 2018, “Ultrafast X-ray Imaging of Laser–
Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes,” J. Synchrotron Radiat., 25(5),
pp. 1467–1477.
[14] Cunningham, R., Zhao, C., Parab, N., Kantzos, C., Pauza, J., Fezzaa, K., Sun, T.,
and Rollett, A. D., 2019, “Keyhole Threshold and Morphology in Laser Melting
Revealed by Ultrahigh-Speed X-Ray Imaging,” Science, 363(6429), pp. 849–852.
[15] Shrestha, S., Starr, T., and Chou, K., 2019, “A Study of Keyhole Porosity in
Selective Laser Melting: Single Track Scanning With Micro-CT Analysis,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 141(7), pp. 1–23.
[16] Ye, J., Rubenchik, A. M., Crumb, M. F., Guss, G., and Matthews, M. J., 2018,
“Laser Absorption and Scaling Behavior in Powder Bed Fusion Additive
Manufacturing of Metals,” Proceedings of the CLEO: Science and Innovations,
Optical Society of America, San Jose, CA, May 13–18, Optical Society of
America, p. JW2A.117.
[17] Mishra, B., and Rajamani, R. K., 1992, “The Discrete Element Method for the
Simulation of Ball Mills,” Appl. Math. Modell., 16(11), pp. 598–604.
[18] Yan, W., Qian, Y., Ge, W., Lin, S., Liu, W. K., Lin, F., and Wagner, G. J., 2018,
“Meso-Scale Modeling of Multiple-Layer Fabrication Process in Selective
Electron Beam Melting: Inter-Layer/Track Voids Formation,” Materials and
Design, 141(2018), pp. 210–219.
[19] Kloss, C., Goniva, C., Hager, A., Amberger, S., and Pirker, S., 2012, “Models,
Algorithms and Validation for Opensource DEM and CFD–DEM,” Prog.
Comput. Fluid Dynam. Int. J., 12(2–3), pp. 140–152.
[20] Escano, L. I., Parab, N. D., Xiong, L., Guo, Q., Zhao, C., Fezzaa, K., Everhart,
W., Sun, T., and Chen, L., 2018, “Revealing Particle-Scale Powder Spreading
Dynamics in Powder-Bed-Based Additive Manufacturing Process by
High-Speed X-Ray Imaging,” Sci. Rep., 8(1), p. 15079.
[21] Gong, H., Gu, H., Zeng, K., Dilip, J., Pal, D., Stucker, B., Christiansen, D., Beuth,
J., and Lewandowski, J. J., 2014, “Melt Pool Characterization for Selective Laser
Melting of Ti-6Al-4V Pre-Alloyed Powder,” Proceedings of the Solid Freeform
Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, Aug. 4–6, pp. 256–267.
[22] Mills, K. C., 2002, Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties for
Selected Commercial Alloys, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
[23] Shrestha, S., and Chou, K., 2017, “A Build Surface Study of Powder-Bed
Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing by 3D Thermo-Fluid Simulation and
White-Light Interferometry,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 121(2017), pp. 37–49.
[24] Cho, J.-H., and Na, S.-J., 2006, “Implementation of Real-Time Multiple
Reflection and Fresnel Absorption of Laser Beam in Keyhole,” J. Phys. D:
Appl. Phys., 39(24), p. 5372.
[25] Dilip, J., Zhang, S., Teng, C., Zeng, K., Robinson, C., Pal, D., and Stucker, B.,
2017, “Influence of Processing Parameters on the Evolution of Melt Pool,
Porosity, and Microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Parts Fabricated by Selective
Laser Melting,” Prog. Add. Manuf., 2(3), pp. 157–167.
[26] Bertoli, U. S., Wolfer, A. J., Matthews, M. J., Delplanque, J.-P. R., and Schoenung,
J. M., 2017, “On the Limitations of Volumetric Energy Density as a Design
Parameter for Selective Laser Melting,” Mater. Des., 113(2017), pp. 331–340.
[27] Kroos, J., Gratzke, U., and Simon, G., 1993, “Towards a Self-Consistent Model of
the Keyhole in Penetration Laser Beam Welding,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 26(3),
p. 474.
[28] Martin, A., Calta, N., Hammons, J., Khairallah, S., Nielsen, M., Shuttlesworth, R.,
Sinclair, N., Matthews, M., Jeffries, J., and Willey, T., 2019, “Ultrafast Dynamics
of Laser-Metal Interactions in Additive Manufacturing Alloys Captured by In Situ
X-Ray Imaging,” Mater. Today Adv., 1(2019), p. 100002.
[29] Shrestha, S., Starr, T., and Chou, K., 2018, “Individual and coupled contributions
of laser power and scanning speed towards process-induced porosity in selective
laser melting,” Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium,
Austin, TX, Aug. 13–15, pp. 1400–1409.
[30] Hann, D., Iammi, J., and Folkes, J., 2011, “A Simple Methodology for Predicting
Laser-Weld Properties From Material and Laser Parameters,” J. Phys. D: Appl.
Phys., 44(44), p. 445401.
[31] Trapp, J., Rubenchik, A. M., Guss, G., and Matthews, M. J., 2017, “In Situ
Absorptivity Measurements of Metallic Powders During Laser Powder-bed
Fusion Additive Manufacturing,” Appl. Mat. Today, 9(2017), pp. 341–349.

Phase change-heat transfer-thermodynamics-Solidification

Thermodynamic reactors… – on-a-chip

David Sinton – Mechanical and Industrial Engineering – University of Toronto

  • Phase change


  • Heat and pressure control phase change and nucleation
  • Example of formation of void at heated plate nucleation site

Solidification

  • Welding
  • Metal deposition
  • 3D printing – metal